Snapshot Data School of Education

Similar documents
08-09 DATA REVIEW AND ACTION PLANS Candidate Reports

Title II, Part A. Charter Systems and Schools

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION. Administrative Officers. About the College. Mission. Highlights. Academic Programs. Sam Houston State University 1

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Internship Department. Sigma + Internship. Supervisor Internship Guide

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

1. Conclusion: Supply and Demand Analysis by Primary Positions

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

New Mexico s Definition of a Highly Qualified Teacher August, 2005

Department of Education School of Education & Human Services Master of Education Policy Manual

Department of Communication Promotion and Tenure Criteria Guidelines. Teaching

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

Requirements for the Degree: Bachelor of Science in Education in Early Childhood Special Education (P-5)

STEM Professionals to Professional Educators Dr. Jennifer Gresko (Faculty Chair of Teacher Education) Principle Investigator

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1

Standards for Professional Practice

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Dr Marios Panteli (EdD) Deputy Primary Headteacher, Teacher Trainer and External Collaborator with the PIC

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS A $10.00 fee will be assessed for all computer education classes.

School Leadership Rubrics

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

Program Elements Definitions and Structure

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Upward Bound Program

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Program Change Proposal:

The following faculty openings are managed by our traditional hiring process:

Idaho Public Schools

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

ANNUAL SCHOOL REPORT SEDA COLLEGE SUITE 1, REDFERN ST., REDFERN, NSW 2016

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

Teacher Preparation at Fort Hays State University: Traditional and Innovative

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología

GACE Computer Science Assessment Test at a Glance

Dr. Charles Barnum Elementary School Improvement Plan

Helping Graduate Students Join an Online Learning Community

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Options for Elementary Band and Strings Program Delivery

Your Child s Transition from Preschool to Kindergarten. Kindergarten Transition Orientation January 2011

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Aurora College Annual Report

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS AT UNC

Year 11 Banana Schedule 2017

TREATMENT OF SMC COURSEWORK FOR STUDENTS WITHOUT AN ASSOCIATE OF ARTS

UNI University Wide Internship

Math 4 Units Algebra I, Applied Algebra I or Algebra I Pt 1 and Algebra I Pt 2

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

K-12 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Co-op Placement Packet

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Guiding Subject Liaison Librarians in Understanding and Acting on User Survey Results

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

PROFESSIONAL INTEGRATION

Queens University of Charlotte

AC : BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS: INTEGRATING THE UNDERGRADUATE INTO THE FACULTY LABORATORY

The Dropout Crisis is a National Issue

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

DegreeWorks Training Guide


EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Bloomsburg University Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania. Department of Teaching and Learning

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Programme Specification

Course Selection for Premedical Students (revised June 2015, with College Curriculum updates)

Frequently Asked Questions Archdiocesan Collaborative Schools (ACS)

Student Success and Academics

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Organising ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education) survey in Finland

Chemistry 495: Internship in Chemistry Department of Chemistry 08/18/17. Syllabus

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

The Site Visit: How to Prepare for It & What to Expect. STARTALK Conference Atlanta, GA May 3, 2012

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

FACULTY OF ARTS & EDUCATION

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for Foundation Year

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS

SCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count

Sancta Maria Catholic Primary School

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Transcription:

Enrollment Numbers (Reported October 2017) EARLY CHILDHOOD SECONDARY EDUCATION Block I 26 PES II 19 (5 biology, 0 chemistry, 4 English, 6 history, & 4 math) Block II 41 PES IV 15 (3 biology, 0 chemistry, 4 English, 6 history, & 2 math) Block III 28 Spring 2017 PES Grads 14 Block IV 39 Spring 2017 ECE Grads 37 & 1 Completer (Certification only, Post-Baccalaureate) Averages Early Childhood GRADUATE GRADUATING F10 3.26 3.38 Sp12 Sp11 3.07 3.30 F12 F11 3.12 3.38 Sp13 Sp12 3.26 3.44 F13 F12 3.24 3.48 Sp14 Sp13 3.18 3.52 F14 F13 3.37 3.54 Sp15 Sp14 3.21 3.47 F15 F14 3.18 3.42 Sp16 Sp15 3.32 3.50 F16 F15 3.30 3.51 Sp17 Sp16 3.36 --- F17 F16 3.44 --- Sp18 Sp17 3.39 --- F18 Secondary GRADUATE GRADUATING FINAL OVERALL CONTENT F10 3.39 3.46 Sp12 3.37 Sp11 n/a n/a n/a n/a F11 3.33 3.43 Sp13 3.29 Sp12 n/a n/a n/a n/a F12 3.25 3.36 Sp14 3.33 Sp13 n/a n/a n/a n/a F13 3.29 3.37 Sp15 3.31 Sp14 n/a n/a n/a n/a F14 3.24 3.42 Sp16 3.38 Sp15 n/a n/a n/a n/a F15 3.25 3.43 Sp17 3.41 Sp16 n/a n/a n/a n/a F16 3.35 --- Sp18 --- Sp17 n/a n/a n/a n/a GACE Test Passing Rates ECE graduates ACADEMIC CONTENT #TEST PASS TEST I TEST II STATE PASS YEAR AREA #PASSED TAKERS RATE % PASS % PASS % RATE % 2009-2010 Early Childhood 79 80 98.7 --- --- 93 2010-2011 Early Childhood 68 71 95.7 --- --- 91 2011-2012 Early Childhood 58 59 98.0 --- --- 92 2012-2013 Early Childhood 57 59 96.6 --- --- 96 ECE-Old GACE 38 41 92.7 92.7 100 99 2013-2014 ECE-New GACE 17 17 100 100 100 99 Professional: 82.4 Professional: 52.9 Induction: 17.6 Induction: 47.1 2014-2015 ECE-Old GACE 1 1 100 100 100 98/99 ECE-New GACE 64 66 97 97 97 99/96 1

Professional: 74.4 Induction: 22.1 Professional: 75.6 Induction: 22.1 2015-2016 ECE-Old GACE 1 1 100 100 100 100/100 ECE-New GACE 49 49 100 100 100 Professional: 74 Professional: 69 Induction: 22.1 Induction: 22.1 2016-2017* ECE-New GACE 61 61 100 100 100 Professional: 88.5 Professional: 72.1 unavailable *unofficial Induction: 11.5 Induction: 27.9 Old & new GACE minimum passing score: 220 New GACE only: Induction level: Scores of 220-249 Professional level: Score of 250+ GACE Test Passing Rates - Secondary graduates GACE test passing rates for secondary education students are not disaggregated to protect the anonymity of individual test takers. GACE Students Earning Professional Level at Graduation (Passing both Test I & II at professional level) ECE PES* 25 of 37 9 of 14 68% 64% *All content areas combined for anonymity. Reported Job Placement Rates Early Childhood Education Grads (ECE) Placement Rate Secondary Grads (PES) Placement Rate Updated (since last report) Graduation Term Spring 2009 71% n/a Spring 2010 86% n/a Spring 2011 82% n/a Fall 2011 70% n/a Spring 2012 67% 69%* * First Secondary Grads Fall 2012 61% n/a Spring 2013 58% 67% Fall 2013 52% n/a Spring 2014 84% 88% Fall 2014 57% n/a Spring 2015 51% 56% Fall 2015 75% n/a Spring 2016 86% 85% Fall 2016 92% n/a Spring 2017 76% 71% 2

Employer Survey Results 2009-2010 Survey = 100% 2010-2011 Survey = 100% 2011-2012 Survey = 100% (n=4) o 100% (4/4) of the employers were satisfied on 23 of the elements of the survey. 25% (1/4) of the respondents believed that the teacher did not hold high expectations for all students, did not demonstrate a caring environment, and did not establish respectful and productive relationships with families and communities to support student learning. 2012-2013 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. 2013-2014 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. 2014-2015 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. 2015-2016 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. 2016-2017 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. Alumni Satisfaction Results Of the two 2011-2012 Alumni who took and submitted the First-Year Alumni Survey, 100% rated the level of their preparation by the program at the end of their first year of teaching positively. Only one 2012 Alumni took and submitted the Second-Year Alumni Survey and s/he rated the level of his/her preparation by the program at the end of their first year of teaching positively. 2012-2013 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. 2013-2014 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. 2014-2015 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. 2015-2016 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. 2016-2017 Survey results are unavailable. The GaPSC is creating new surveys. Early Childhood Education (ECE) Graduate Completers Survey Results Spring 2017 36 respondents 81.7% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Content and Curriculum survey o Graduates were most confident in being prepared to demonstrate broad, current, and specialized knowledge in their field (84%) and in their ability to interpret and construct school, district, and programmatic curricula that reflect state and national content area standards (84%). o Graduates were least confident that their field placement helped them gain the expertise in content and curriculum. (78%). 3

o There was an 12.3% decrease in the number of students who positively agreed with the statements in this category versus the students who positively agreed in the Fall 2016 survey (94%, down 10% from Spring 2016). 82% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Knowledge of Students, Teaching and Learning survey o Graduates were most confident in their ability to work with students identified as needing special education services (84%). o Graduates were less confident in feeling prepared to demonstrate an understanding of how students develop and learn (78%). o Overall, there was an 11% decrease in the number of students who positively agreed with the statements in this category versus the students who positively agreed in the Fall 2016 survey (93%, up 8% from Spring 2016). 83.5% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Learning Environments survey o Graduates were most confident in their ability to create learning environments that focus on engaging all students in learning, collaboratively and individually (86%). o The average in all other markers in this category (graduates being able to manage time, space, activities, technology, and other resources to provide active and equitable engagement of diverse students and adults in productive tasks; graduates ability to implement effective classroom management strategies in all school spaces; graduates knowledge about human motivation and behavior to develop strategies for organizing and supporting learning; graduates ability to use knowledge of students unique cultures, experiences, and communities to sustain culturally responsive classrooms and schools; and, graduates feeling their field placement helped them gain the expertise in learning environments) was 83%. o There was an 8.5% decrease in the number of students who positively agreed with the statements in this category versus the students who positively agreed in the Fall 2016 survey (92%, up 7% from Spring 2016). 82.8% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Classroom, Program, and School-wide Assessment survey o Graduates were most confident in their ability to use assessment data to communicate knowledgeably and responsibly to students, parents, community, and school personnel (84%). o Graduates were less confident in their ability to choose, develop, and use assessment o methods appropriate for instructional programmatic decisions (81%). Overall, there was a 1.2% decrease in the number of students who positively agreed with the statements in this category versus the students who positively agreed in the Fall 2016 and Spring 2016 surveys (both 84%). 83% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Planning and Instruction survey o There was no difference in the results of individual markers within this category. (83%). Markers within the category: I believe I am prepared to plan and carry out instruction and programs based on knowledge of state and district performance standards, curriculum, students, learning environments, and assessment data;**i plan to keep up with and use methods consistent with current theory, research, and practice;**i plan to reflect on my practice and make necessary adjustments to enhance learning;**i plan to integrate technology and other multimedia resources appropriately to maximize student learning opportunities for all students. 4

o However, there was a significant decrease (10%) in the number of students who positively agreed with the statements in this category versus the students who positively agreed in the Fall 2016 survey (93%), as well as being lower than Spring 2016 (84%). 92% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Professionalism survey o The average for most all markers in this category (being able to work collaboratively with colleagues and other professionals; understanding and believing they can implement laws related to rights and responsibilities of students, educators, and families; being prepared to follow established codes of conduct, including school and district policies; being prepared to treat students equitably; and, planning to seek opportunities to learn based on reflection, input from others, and career goals) was 95%. o Graduates were less confident in being prepared to participate in mentoring of future educators (85%). o There was no change in the number of students who positively agreed with the statements in this category versus the students who positively agreed in the Fall 2016 survey (a 7% increase from Spring 2016). It is noted that 67.6% of ECE graduates for Spring 2017 obtained the ESOL endorsement (down 21.4% from Fall 2016). 5

Secondary (PES) Education Graduate Completers Survey Results Spring 2017 10 respondents 95% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Content and Curriculum survey o Graduates were most confident in being prepared to demonstrate broad, current, and specialized knowledge in their field(s); their plans to stay current in their field(s) of expertise as an engaged learner; and, that their field placement helped them gain the expertise in content and curriculum (100%). o Graduates were least positive in being prepared to understand and use content and pedagogical knowledge that is appropriate for diverse learners; in their ability to interpret and construct school, district, and programmatic curricula that reflect state and national content area standards; and, in their plans to relate their field to other areas of the school and to everyday life (90%). o There was a 5% increase in the number of students who positively agreed with the 2016 survey (90%). 99% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Knowledge of Students, Teaching and Learning survey o Seven of eight markers in this category scored the most positive responses (100% each). This is up from five in Spring 2016. o Graduates were least confident in their plans to use the best professional practices to meet the needs of diverse learners (90%). o There was an 5% increase in the number of students who positively agreed with the 2016 survey (94%). 100% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Learning Environments survey o All six markers in this category scored the most positive responses (100% each). o There was a 2% increase in the number of students who positively agreed with the 2016 survey (98%). 100% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Classroom, Program, and School-wide Assessment survey o Graduates were fully confident in all markers of (four of four) in this category (100% each). o There was no change in the number of students who positively agreed with the 2016 survey (100%). 98% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Planning and Instruction survey o Graduates were fully confident in four of the five markers in this category (100% each). o Graduates were least confident that their field placement helped them gain the expertise in planning and instruction (90%). 6

o There was a 2% decrease in the number of students who positively agreed with the 2016 survey (100%). 96.6% responded positively (strongly agree/agree) to the Professionalism survey o Seven of nine markers in this category scored the most positive responses (100% each). o Graduates were least confident in being prepared to participate in mentoring of future educators (80%). o There was an 1.4% decrease in the number of students who positively agreed with the 2016 survey (98%). It is noted that two PES graduates for Spring 2017 obtained the ESOL endorsement. This is an increase of one from Spring 2016 as this endorsement is newly offered to secondary education students. 7