TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2017 Distinction Designation Summary - ELA/Reading CAMBRIDGE EL ( ) - ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD Campus Type: Elementary

Similar documents
Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

African American Success Initiative

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

New Hanover County Schools Announce the Results for the READY Assessments and Report the Highest Graduation Rate to Date

FY Matching Scholarship Grant Allocations by County Based on Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) Population 1

Closing the. Higher. Achievement. Education. Gap: Strategies. Ecosystems. from the Field

Garland Independent School District Davis Elementary School Improvement Plan

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

SPEAK UP 200 SCHOOLS 2009 PARTICIPATION

Educational Resources. National Council or Teachers of English NCTE and Conference of English Leadership CEL

KANSAS SCHOOL FIRE DRILL LOG

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Northern Vance High School Athletic Director. Dr. Michael Applewhite. Until Filled

COURSE CATALOG & EDUCATIONAL PLANNING GUIDE SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT LAKE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL

TESTING. Who Must Take the TSI Assessment Exam? Who Does Not Have to Take the TSI Assessment Exam? When Must a Student Take the TSI Assessment Exam?

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

WELCOME JUNIORS SENIOR YEAR SCHEDULING

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Heritage High School Home of the Coyotes. Class of 2017 Registration for Senior Classes

Senior Parent Meeting What s next?

12 Banquete ISD. 13 Robert Driscoll Elementary School. 14 Bishop CISD Badger Den. 15 The People's Baptist Church. 16 London Middle/High School

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

MPA SKI BULLETIN (updated 11/9/17)

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Harmony School of Advancement Harmony Public Schools Course Selection Guide

College Entrance Testing:

Cooper Upper Elementary School

MAGNET PROGRAM REVIEW. Authors : Anisa Rhea Ph.D., WCPSS Evaluation and Research Department Roger Regan Ph.D., WCPSS Magnet Programs ABSTRACT

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Praxis Study Guide For 5086

PreAP Geometry. Ms. Patricia Winkler

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Cardiovascular Sonography/Adult Echocardiography (Diploma)

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

THE CLASS OF Congratulations!

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development Volume V, Issue 3 - Fall 2011

NEW NCAA Division I Initial-Eligibility Academic Requirements

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

THE MEN BEHIND THE PULPIT (RICHMOND HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, YADKIN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION) - NCCF. November June 1901

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Wsu Study Guide Download or Read Online ebook wsu study guide in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Measures of the Location of the Data

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

u Articulation and Transfer Best Practices

Rural Education in Oregon

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

The Boston Zoning Variance Database

December s Featured Business. In this issue. TAKE ACTION:

DENTAL HYGIENE. Fall 2018 Admissions Information. *** Deadline: May 17th, 2018 ***

learning collegiate assessment]

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

Grade 5 + DIGITAL. EL Strategies. DOK 1-4 RTI Tiers 1-3. Flexible Supplemental K-8 ELA & Math Online & Print

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

PEIMS Submission 1 list

MEMORANDUM. Leo Zuniga, Associate Vice Chancellor Communications

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

Transportation Equity Analysis

2008 TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS REPORT

Roadmap to College: Highly Selective Schools

Catalog Supplement Pasco Yakima A Learning Site of Pasco

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

Mastering Biology Test Answers

Two-thirds of APS Schools Increase on State CCRPI Scores

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

Distinguished Teacher Review

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

Welcome to ACT Brain Boot Camp

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Transcription:

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - ELA/Reading Quartile Attendance Rate 96.5% Q4 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in ELA/Reading 32.0% Q1 Grade 3 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 39.0% Q3 Grade 4 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 34.0% Q3 Grade 4 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) 9.0% Q4 Grade 5 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 46.0% Q1 Grade 6 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English I Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English II Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: ELA AP/IB Examination Performance: ELA SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: ELA ACT Performance: ELA Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: ELA/Reading Total s for ELA/Reading 2 of 6 Distinction Campus Outcome: 2 of 6 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 2 of 6 = 33% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The attendance rate indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to ELA/reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 1 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Mathematics Quartile Attendance Rate 96.5% Q4 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in Mathematics 29.0% Q2 Grade 3 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 25.0% Q4 Grade 4 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 22.0% Q4 Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 33.0% Q3 Grade 6 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation EOC Algebra I Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: Mathematics AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: Mathematics Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Mathematics Total s for Mathematics 0 of 5 Distinction Campus Outcome: 0 of 5 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 0 of 5 = 0% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The attendance rate indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to ELA/reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 2 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Science Quartile Attendance Rate 96.5% Q4 Grade 5 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) 17.0% Q4 Grade 8 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC Biology Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: Science AP/IB Examination Performance: Science ACT Performance: Science Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Science Total s for Science 0 of 2 Distinction Campus Outcome: 0 of 2 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 0 of 2 = 0% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The attendance rate indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to ELA/reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 3 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Social Studies This campus is not eligible for this Distinction Designation. See the 2017 Accountability Manual for more information. NOT ELIGIBLE TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 4 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Top 25% in Student Progress Campus Name District Name Index 2 1 MIRELES EL (015915195) NORTHSIDE ISD 59 2 METZLER EL (101915123) KLEIN ISD 55 3 ROBISON EL (101907140) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 55 4 BRUSHY CREEK EL (246909114) ROUND ROCK ISD 52 5 KEELEY EL (057909144) GARLAND ISD 52 6 KOLTER EL (101912189) HOUSTON ISD 52 7 OAK FOREST EL (101912211) HOUSTON ISD 51 8 STEPHEN F AUSTIN EL (079901114) LAMAR CISD 51 9 TRAVIS EL (101912249) HOUSTON ISD 51 10 COWAN EL (227901183) AUSTIN ISD 50 11 BRENTWOOD EL (227901107) AUSTIN ISD 49 12 DEER PARK ELEMENTARY (101908105) DEER PARK ISD 49 13 I W AND ELEANOR HYDE EL (084910120) CLEAR CREEK ISD 49 14 SAVANNAH EL (061901119) DENTON ISD 49 15 LA VERNIA INT (247903104) LA VERNIA ISD 48 16 NELSON EL (061901121) DENTON ISD 48 17 PINEFOREST EL (101913111) HUMBLE ISD 48 18 RALPH PARR EL (084910128) CLEAR CREEK ISD 48 19 BEAR CREEK EL (220906106) GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVILLE ISD 47 20 HARVARD EL (101912169) HOUSTON ISD 47 21 STONEWALL JACKSON EL (057905162) DALLAS ISD 47 22 WOODRIDGE EL (015901104) ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 47 23 COMANCHE SPRINGS EL (220918110) EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD 46 24 HAUDE EL (101915103) KLEIN ISD 46 25 HUEBNER EL (015910135) NORTH EAST ISD 46 26 JACOB'S WELL EL (105905101) WIMBERLEY ISD 46 CAMBRIDGE EL (015901101) ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 45 27 WOODLAND HILLS EL (101913105) HUMBLE ISD 45 28 FAIRMONT ELEMENTARY (101908108) DEER PARK ISD 44 29 GARY AND BOBBYE JACK MINSHEW EL (043907121) MCKINNEY ISD 44 30 KUEHNLE EL (101915115) KLEIN ISD 44 31 PECAN GROVE EL (079907125) FORT BEND ISD 44 32 WALKER CREEK EL (220902121) BIRDVILLE ISD 44 33 KOLDA EL (178904158) CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 43 34 LAKE POINTE EL (220918112) EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD 43 35 RIOJAS EL (227904118) PFLUGERVILLE ISD 43 36 MAPLEBROOK EL (101913119) HUMBLE ISD 42 37 JESSE MCGOWEN EL (043907123) MCKINNEY ISD 40 38 PLEASANT HILL EL (246913114) LEANDER ISD 37 39 POND SPRINGS EL (246909117) ROUND ROCK ISD 37 40 JIM PLAIN EL (246913116) LEANDER ISD 34 Top 25% in Student Progress Target = Index 2 of 50 Blank values for an Index 2 occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10. Where Index 2 scores are identical the campuses are listed alphabetically by campus name. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 5 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Top 25% in Closing Performance Gaps Campus Name District Name Index 3 1 KEELEY EL (057909144) GARLAND ISD 59 2 MIRELES EL (015915195) NORTHSIDE ISD 59 3 OAK FOREST EL (101912211) HOUSTON ISD 59 4 METZLER EL (101915123) KLEIN ISD 57 5 DEER PARK ELEMENTARY (101908105) DEER PARK ISD 56 6 STEPHEN F AUSTIN EL (079901114) LAMAR CISD 56 7 GARY AND BOBBYE JACK MINSHEW EL (043907121) MCKINNEY ISD 53 8 I W AND ELEANOR HYDE EL (084910120) CLEAR CREEK ISD 53 9 KOLDA EL (178904158) CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 53 10 ROBISON EL (101907140) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 53 11 COWAN EL (227901183) AUSTIN ISD 52 12 BRUSHY CREEK EL (246909114) ROUND ROCK ISD 50 13 FAIRMONT ELEMENTARY (101908108) DEER PARK ISD 50 14 WOODLAND HILLS EL (101913105) HUMBLE ISD 50 15 NELSON EL (061901121) DENTON ISD 49 16 STONEWALL JACKSON EL (057905162) DALLAS ISD 49 17 WALKER CREEK EL (220902121) BIRDVILLE ISD 49 18 BEAR CREEK EL (220906106) GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVILLE ISD 48 19 KOLTER EL (101912189) HOUSTON ISD 48 20 LAKE POINTE EL (220918112) EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD 48 21 LA VERNIA INT (247903104) LA VERNIA ISD 47 22 RIOJAS EL (227904118) PFLUGERVILLE ISD 47 23 HARVARD EL (101912169) HOUSTON ISD 46 24 PECAN GROVE EL (079907125) FORT BEND ISD 46 25 PINEFOREST EL (101913111) HUMBLE ISD 46 26 TRAVIS EL (101912249) HOUSTON ISD 46 27 MAPLEBROOK EL (101913119) HUMBLE ISD 45 28 RALPH PARR EL (084910128) CLEAR CREEK ISD 45 29 BRENTWOOD EL (227901107) AUSTIN ISD 44 30 HUEBNER EL (015910135) NORTH EAST ISD 44 31 JESSE MCGOWEN EL (043907123) MCKINNEY ISD 44 32 KUEHNLE EL (101915115) KLEIN ISD 44 33 SAVANNAH EL (061901119) DENTON ISD 44 34 POND SPRINGS EL (246909117) ROUND ROCK ISD 43 35 HAUDE EL (101915103) KLEIN ISD 42 36 COMANCHE SPRINGS EL (220918110) EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD 40 37 JACOB'S WELL EL (105905101) WIMBERLEY ISD 39 38 JIM PLAIN EL (246913116) LEANDER ISD 39 39 WOODRIDGE EL (015901104) ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 36 CAMBRIDGE EL (015901101) ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 35 40 PLEASANT HILL EL (246913114) LEANDER ISD 33 Top 25% in Closing Performance Gaps Target = Index 3 of 53 Blank values for an Index 3 occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10. Where Index 3 scores are identical the campuses are listed alphabetically by campus name. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 6 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Postsecondary Readiness Quartile Index 4 - Percent at STAAR Meets Grade Level Standard 49.0% Q4 Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Plan Rate* College-Ready Graduates Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Any Subject AP/IB Examination Performance: Any Subject SAT/ACT Participation SAT/ACT Performance CTE-Coherent Sequence Graduates Total s for Postsecondary Readiness 0 of 1 Evaluation of campus outcomes: 0 of 1 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 0 of 1 = 0% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. *The four-year longitudinal graduation plan rate is determined by comparing the all students RHSP/DAP rate and the all students RHSP/DAP/FHSP-E/FHSP-DLA rate. The higher of the two rates is used for distinction designations. Refer to the Index 4 Data Table for details. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 7 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary Numerator Denominator Quartile 1 Minimum Attendance Rate 135,386.0 140,242.0 96.5 97.2 Q4 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in ELA/Reading 95 296 32 32 Q1 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in Mathematics 86 296 29 33 Q2 Grade 3 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 57 148 39 48 Q3 Grade 3 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 37 148 25 41 Q4 Grade 4 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 59 175 34 41 Q3 Grade 4 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 39 175 22 42 Q4 Grade 4 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) 16 175 9 21 Q4 Grade 5 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 61 132 46 45 Q1 Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 43 132 33 43 Q3 Grade 5 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) 23 132 17 35 Q4 Grade 6 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 6 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Social Studies Performance (Masters Grade Level) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation EOC Algebra I Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English I Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English II Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC Biology Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC U.S. History Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: ELA AP/IB Examination Participation: Mathematics AP/IB Examination Participation: Science AP/IB Examination Participation: Social Studies AP/IB Examination Performance: ELA AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics AP/IB Examination Performance: Science AP/IB Examination Performance: Social Studies AP/IB Examination Performance: Any Subject SAT/ACT Participation SAT/ACT Performance SAT Performance: ELA SAT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: ELA ACT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: Science Index 4 - Percent at STAAR Meets Grade Level Standard 219 450 49.0 61.5 Q4 Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Plan Rate* College-Ready Graduates Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: ELA/Reading Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Mathematics Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Science Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Social Studies Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Any Subject CTE-Coherent Sequence Graduates Quartile Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this indicator. *The four-year longitudinal graduation plan rate is determined by comparing the all students RHSP/DAP rate and the all students RHSP/DAP/FHSP-E/FHSP-DLArate. The higher of the two rates is used for distinction designations. Refer to the Index 4 Data Table for details. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 8 of 8 August 15, 2017