TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2017 Distinction Designation Summary - ELA/Reading WOODRIDGE EL ( ) - ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD Campus Type: Elementary

Similar documents
Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

African American Success Initiative

Closing the. Higher. Achievement. Education. Gap: Strategies. Ecosystems. from the Field

COURSE CATALOG & EDUCATIONAL PLANNING GUIDE SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT LAKE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL

New Hanover County Schools Announce the Results for the READY Assessments and Report the Highest Graduation Rate to Date

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Garland Independent School District Davis Elementary School Improvement Plan

Senior Parent Meeting What s next?

Heritage High School Home of the Coyotes. Class of 2017 Registration for Senior Classes

Harmony School of Advancement Harmony Public Schools Course Selection Guide

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

College Entrance Testing:

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

PreAP Geometry. Ms. Patricia Winkler

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

Educational Resources. National Council or Teachers of English NCTE and Conference of English Leadership CEL

TESTING. Who Must Take the TSI Assessment Exam? Who Does Not Have to Take the TSI Assessment Exam? When Must a Student Take the TSI Assessment Exam?

Praxis Study Guide For 5086

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

WELCOME JUNIORS SENIOR YEAR SCHEDULING

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

FY Matching Scholarship Grant Allocations by County Based on Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) Population 1

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Wsu Study Guide Download or Read Online ebook wsu study guide in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Cooper Upper Elementary School

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

A Lesson Study Project: Connecting Theory and Practice Through the Development of an Exemplar Video for Algebra I Teachers and Students

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

KANSAS SCHOOL FIRE DRILL LOG

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

CURRENT POSITION: Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas

SPEAK UP 200 SCHOOLS 2009 PARTICIPATION

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Austin Community College SYLLABUS

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Apps4VA at JMU. Student Projects Featuring VLDS Data. Dr. Chris Mayfield. Department of Computer Science James Madison University

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

Cheating Pearson Mylab

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

NEW NCAA Division I Initial-Eligibility Academic Requirements

3.7 General Education Homebound (GEH) Program

Measures of the Location of the Data

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

PEIMS Submission 3 list

Work Stations 101: Grades K-5 NCTM Regional Conference &

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

DENTAL HYGIENE. Fall 2018 Admissions Information. *** Deadline: May 17th, 2018 ***

learning collegiate assessment]

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

Oregon NASA Space Grant

Grade 5 + DIGITAL. EL Strategies. DOK 1-4 RTI Tiers 1-3. Flexible Supplemental K-8 ELA & Math Online & Print

MPA SKI BULLETIN (updated 11/9/17)

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

Math & Science Collaborative. Math & Science Collaborative Spring/Summer

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

December s Featured Business. In this issue. TAKE ACTION:

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

Dibels Next Benchmarks Kindergarten 2013

Roadmap to College: Highly Selective Schools

Embedding Diversity into Family Engagement Strategies

November 11, 2014 SCHOOL NAMING NEWS:

Cardiovascular Sonography/Adult Echocardiography (Diploma)

African American Male Achievement Update

Montana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education

Mastering Biology Test Answers

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

2008 TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS REPORT

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

TxEIS Secondary Grade Reporting Semester 2 & EOY Checklist for txgradebook

Transcription:

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - ELA/Reading Quartile Attendance Rate 96.8% Q3 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in ELA/Reading 26.0% Q3 Grade 3 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 39.0% Q3 Grade 4 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 30.0% Q4 Grade 4 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) 15.0% Q3 Grade 5 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 40.0% Q3 Grade 6 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English I Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English II Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: ELA AP/IB Examination Performance: ELA SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: ELA ACT Performance: ELA Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: ELA/Reading Total s for ELA/Reading 0 of 6 Distinction Campus Outcome: 0 of 6 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 0 of 6 = 0% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The attendance rate indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to ELA/reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 1 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Mathematics Quartile Attendance Rate 96.8% Q3 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in Mathematics 28.0% Q3 Grade 3 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 22.0% Q4 Grade 4 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 35.0% Q3 Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 37.0% Q3 Grade 6 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation EOC Algebra I Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: Mathematics AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: Mathematics Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Mathematics Total s for Mathematics 0 of 5 Distinction Campus Outcome: 0 of 5 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 0 of 5 = 0% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The attendance rate indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to ELA/reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 2 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Science Quartile Attendance Rate 96.8% Q3 Grade 5 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) 18.0% Q4 Grade 8 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC Biology Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: Science AP/IB Examination Performance: Science ACT Performance: Science Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Science Total s for Science 0 of 2 Distinction Campus Outcome: 0 of 2 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 0 of 2 = 0% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The attendance rate indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to ELA/reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 3 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Social Studies This campus is not eligible for this Distinction Designation. See the 2017 Accountability Manual for more information. NOT ELIGIBLE TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 4 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Top 25% in Student Progress Campus Name District Name Index 2 1 HORN EL (101912178) HOUSTON ISD 63 2 LINDA HERRINGTON EL (246909138) ROUND ROCK ISD 60 3 MIRELES EL (015915195) NORTHSIDE ISD 59 4 METZLER EL (101915123) KLEIN ISD 55 5 ROBISON EL (101907140) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 55 6 TUSCANY HEIGHTS (015910144) NORTH EAST ISD 55 7 FALL CREEK EL (101913124) HUMBLE ISD 53 8 ROWE LANE EL (227904115) PFLUGERVILLE ISD 53 9 BRUSHY CREEK EL (246909114) ROUND ROCK ISD 52 10 INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF TEXAS (057848007) INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF TEXAS 52 11 ATASCOCITA SPRINGS EL (101913126) HUMBLE ISD 51 12 CIBOLO GREEN (015910145) NORTH EAST ISD 51 13 HOFFMANN EL (015915188) NORTHSIDE ISD 51 14 OAK FOREST EL (101912211) HOUSTON ISD 51 15 TRAVIS EL (101912249) HOUSTON ISD 51 16 BARANOFF EL (227901182) AUSTIN ISD 50 17 FARNEY EL (101907135) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 50 18 KEITH EL (101907143) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 49 19 WALTER HALL EL (084910115) CLEAR CREEK ISD 49 20 BENIGNUS EL (101915124) KLEIN ISD 48 21 HUGGINS EL (079901110) LAMAR CISD 48 22 LA VERNIA INT (247903104) LA VERNIA ISD 48 23 RALPH PARR EL (084910128) CLEAR CREEK ISD 48 24 HARVARD EL (101912169) HOUSTON ISD 47 WOODRIDGE EL (015901104) ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 47 25 HAUDE EL (101915103) KLEIN ISD 46 26 SUMMERWOOD EL (101913120) HUMBLE ISD 46 27 AULT EL (101907133) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 45 28 CAMBRIDGE EL (015901101) ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 45 29 LAKESHORE EL (101913125) HUMBLE ISD 45 30 EAGLE SPRINGS EL (101913121) HUMBLE ISD 44 31 FAIRMONT ELEMENTARY (101908108) DEER PARK ISD 44 32 KUEHNLE EL (101915115) KLEIN ISD 44 33 LAKE POINTE EL (220918112) EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD 43 34 RIOJAS EL (227904118) PFLUGERVILLE ISD 43 35 BARBERS HILL EL SOUTH (036902105) BARBERS HILL ISD 42 36 DRIPPING SPRINGS EL (105904101) DRIPPING SPRINGS ISD 41 37 LLOYD R FERGUSON EL (084910117) CLEAR CREEK ISD 41 38 JESSE MCGOWEN EL (043907123) MCKINNEY ISD 40 39 WALNUT SPRINGS EL (105904102) DRIPPING SPRINGS ISD 39 40 PLEASANT HILL EL (246913114) LEANDER ISD 37 Top 25% in Student Progress Target = Index 2 of 52 Blank values for an Index 2 occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10. Where Index 2 scores are identical the campuses are listed alphabetically by campus name. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 5 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Top 25% in Closing Performance Gaps Campus Name District Name Index 3 1 HORN EL (101912178) HOUSTON ISD 67 2 LINDA HERRINGTON EL (246909138) ROUND ROCK ISD 61 3 MIRELES EL (015915195) NORTHSIDE ISD 59 4 OAK FOREST EL (101912211) HOUSTON ISD 59 5 METZLER EL (101915123) KLEIN ISD 57 6 ROWE LANE EL (227904115) PFLUGERVILLE ISD 57 7 KEITH EL (101907143) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 56 8 TUSCANY HEIGHTS (015910144) NORTH EAST ISD 56 9 BARANOFF EL (227901182) AUSTIN ISD 55 10 FARNEY EL (101907135) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 54 11 AULT EL (101907133) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 53 12 INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF TEXAS (057848007) INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF TEXAS 53 13 ROBISON EL (101907140) CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD 53 14 CIBOLO GREEN (015910145) NORTH EAST ISD 52 15 BENIGNUS EL (101915124) KLEIN ISD 50 16 BRUSHY CREEK EL (246909114) ROUND ROCK ISD 50 17 FAIRMONT ELEMENTARY (101908108) DEER PARK ISD 50 18 WALTER HALL EL (084910115) CLEAR CREEK ISD 50 19 BARBERS HILL EL SOUTH (036902105) BARBERS HILL ISD 49 20 ATASCOCITA SPRINGS EL (101913126) HUMBLE ISD 48 21 LAKE POINTE EL (220918112) EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD 48 22 HOFFMANN EL (015915188) NORTHSIDE ISD 47 23 HUGGINS EL (079901110) LAMAR CISD 47 24 LA VERNIA INT (247903104) LA VERNIA ISD 47 25 RIOJAS EL (227904118) PFLUGERVILLE ISD 47 26 HARVARD EL (101912169) HOUSTON ISD 46 27 LLOYD R FERGUSON EL (084910117) CLEAR CREEK ISD 46 28 TRAVIS EL (101912249) HOUSTON ISD 46 29 FALL CREEK EL (101913124) HUMBLE ISD 45 30 RALPH PARR EL (084910128) CLEAR CREEK ISD 45 31 EAGLE SPRINGS EL (101913121) HUMBLE ISD 44 32 JESSE MCGOWEN EL (043907123) MCKINNEY ISD 44 33 KUEHNLE EL (101915115) KLEIN ISD 44 34 WALNUT SPRINGS EL (105904102) DRIPPING SPRINGS ISD 43 35 DRIPPING SPRINGS EL (105904101) DRIPPING SPRINGS ISD 42 36 HAUDE EL (101915103) KLEIN ISD 42 37 LAKESHORE EL (101913125) HUMBLE ISD 42 38 SUMMERWOOD EL (101913120) HUMBLE ISD 40 WOODRIDGE EL (015901104) ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 36 39 CAMBRIDGE EL (015901101) ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 35 40 PLEASANT HILL EL (246913114) LEANDER ISD 33 Top 25% in Closing Performance Gaps Target = Index 3 of 54 Blank values for an Index 3 occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10. Where Index 3 scores are identical the campuses are listed alphabetically by campus name. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 6 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Postsecondary Readiness Quartile Index 4 - Percent at STAAR Meets Grade Level Standard 50.0% Q4 Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Plan Rate* College-Ready Graduates Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Any Subject AP/IB Examination Performance: Any Subject SAT/ACT Participation SAT/ACT Performance CTE-Coherent Sequence Graduates Total s for Postsecondary Readiness 0 of 1 Evaluation of campus outcomes: 0 of 1 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 0 of 1 = 0% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. *The four-year longitudinal graduation plan rate is determined by comparing the all students RHSP/DAP rate and the all students RHSP/DAP/FHSP-E/FHSP-DLA rate. The higher of the two rates is used for distinction designations. Refer to the Index 4 Data Table for details. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 7 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary Numerator Denominator Quartile 1 Minimum Attendance Rate 159,077.0 164,283.0 96.8 97.3 Q3 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in ELA/Reading 96 372 26 32 Q3 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in Mathematics 106 374 28 37 Q3 Grade 3 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 72 183 39 47 Q3 Grade 3 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 41 183 22 43 Q4 Grade 4 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 55 183 30 41 Q4 Grade 4 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 64 183 35 46 Q3 Grade 4 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) 27 182 15 20 Q3 Grade 5 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 82 203 40 47 Q3 Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 75 203 37 44 Q3 Grade 5 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) 36 202 18 36 Q4 Grade 6 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 6 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Social Studies Performance (Masters Grade Level) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation EOC Algebra I Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English I Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English II Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC Biology Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC U.S. History Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: ELA AP/IB Examination Participation: Mathematics AP/IB Examination Participation: Science AP/IB Examination Participation: Social Studies AP/IB Examination Performance: ELA AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics AP/IB Examination Performance: Science AP/IB Examination Performance: Social Studies AP/IB Examination Performance: Any Subject SAT/ACT Participation SAT/ACT Performance SAT Performance: ELA SAT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: ELA ACT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: Science Index 4 - Percent at STAAR Meets Grade Level Standard 283 567 50.0 61.5 Q4 Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Plan Rate* College-Ready Graduates Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: ELA/Reading Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Mathematics Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Science Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Social Studies Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Any Subject CTE-Coherent Sequence Graduates Quartile Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this indicator. *The four-year longitudinal graduation plan rate is determined by comparing the all students RHSP/DAP rate and the all students RHSP/DAP/FHSP-E/FHSP-DLArate. The higher of the two rates is used for distinction designations. Refer to the Index 4 Data Table for details. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 8 of 8 August 15, 2017