Box 5.1 The contribution of the NCR in India s GDP is almost twice its share of population.

5 Economic Scenario 5.1 BACKGROUND The size and nature of economic activities in NCR have changed over the years. Improvement of urban infrastructure especially in terms of connectivity after the completion of Phase II of Delhi Metro and its extensions to the CNCR and construction of expressways have had a profound effect on the nature of economic activities within NCR. Other proposed projects like the DMIC Corridor and Dedicated Freight Corridor are expected to have a further significant impact on the economic activities in NCR. 5.1.1 Gross Domestic Product During the period 2004-05 to 2009-10, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of India increased by 52 percent whereas the GDP of NCR increased by 67 percent Table 5.1. Table 5.1: Growth of GDP in NCR and India at Constant (2004-05) Prices (Rs. in Lakh) Year 2004-05 GDP (NCR) 1,90,99,210 2,09,15,449 2,37,68,255 2,61,41,707 2,88,72,616 3,19,34,743 GDP (India) 29,71,46,40 32,53,07,300 35,64,36,400 38,96,63,600 41,58,67,600 45,16,07,100 % share of NCR GDP 6.4 6.4 6.7 6.7 6.9 7.1 Source: CSO (National Account Statistics); Economic Survey of Delhi, 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in NCR contributed 7.1 percent to India s GDP in 2009-10, whereas its share in the population was 3.8 percent and its land area even lesser at 1 percent (Figure 5.1). Box 5.1 The contribution of the NCR in India s GDP is almost twice its share of population. Figure 5.1: Share of NCR s GDP to India s GDP 7.2% 7.0% 6.8% 6.6% 6.4% 6.2% 6.0% 2004-05 Source: CSO (National Account Statistics); Economic Survey of Delhi, 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in 5.1.2 Growth Rate of GDP During the period 2004-05 to 2009-10, NCR s GDP growth rate has consistently been higher than the all India growth rate except for the year 2007-08 when the growth rate of GDP of NCR and India were almost equal (Table 5.2 and Fig. 5.2).

42 Regional Plan 2021 Table 5.2: Rate of Growth of GDP in NCR and in India (in %) Year Rate of Growth of GDP (India) Rate of Growth of GDP (NCR) 2005-06 9.5 9.5 2006-07 9.6 13.6 2007-08 9.3 10.0 2008-09 6.7 10.4 2009-10 8.6 10.6 AAGR 8.7 11.2 Fig. 5.2: Growth Rate of GDP in NCR and in India Source: CSO (National Account Statistics); Economic Survey of Delhi, 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in Note: Analysis has been done from 2004-05 onwards because data for the previous periods uses a different base price. Annual Growth Rate of GDP 14.0 13.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 AGR of GDP (NCR) AGR of GDP (India) 5.1.3 Per Capita Income During the period 2004-05 to 2009-10, the per capita income of NCR went up from Rs. 38,758 to Rs. 59,264 whereas the all India figures for the same period were Rs. 24,143 and Rs. 33,901 respectively (Table 5.3). Box 5.2 The Per Capita Income of the NCR had consistently been higher than the India s Per Capita Income during the period 2004-05 to 2009-10. Table 5.3: Growth of Per Capita Income in NCR and India at constant (2004-05) prices (in Rs.) 2004-05 Per Capita Income of NCR 38,758 42,431 47,672 50,819 54,945 59,264 Per Capita Income of India 24,143 26,015 28,067 30,332 31,754 33,901 Source: CSO (National Account Statistics); Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in Table 5.4: Rate of Growth of Per Capita Income in NCR and in India (in %) Year Rate of Growth of Per Capita Income (India) Rate of Growth of Per Capita Income (NCR) 2005-06 7.8 9.5 2006-07 7.9 12.4 2007-08 8.1 6.6 2008-09 4.7 8.1 2009-10 6.8 7.9 AAGR 6.7 8.8 Fig. 5.3: Growth rate of Per Capita Income in NCR and in India Growth Rate (%) 13.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 AGR of Per Capita Income (NCR) AGR of Per Capita Income (India) Source: CSO (National Account Statistics); Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in Table 5.4 shows the temporal change in per capita income growth rates during the period of analysis. The rate of growth of per capita income of NCR had been higher than the rate of growth of per capita income of India except in the period 2007-08 when the rate of growth of per capita income of NCR was 6.6 percent and that of India was 8.1 percent. 5.2 SUB-REGION WISE ANALYSIS Among the various sub regions of NCR, Delhi had the highest share of GDP in NCR followed by Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan Sub-Regions in 2009-10 (Table 5.5).

Economic Scenario 43 Table 5.5: Sub Region-wise GDP at Constant (2004-05) Prices (Rs. in Lakh) Sub Region 2004-05 NCT Delhi 1,00,32,452 1,10,40,607 1,24,07,958 1,37,96,086 1,55,79,109 1,69,83,898 Haryana 49,68,182 56,06,600 62,14,479 68,65,661 74,49,249 86,67,303 Rajasthan 7,74,203 7,74,257 9,04,513 9,35,761 11,01,098 12,19,010 Uttar Pradesh 33,24,373 34,93,985 42,41,305 45,44,199 47,43,160 50,64,532 NCR 1,90,99,210 2,09,15,449 2,37,68,255 2,61,41,707 2,88,72,616 3,19,34,743 Source: Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economic and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in Fig. 5.4: Comparison of Share of GDP of Different Sub-Regions of NCR in 2004-05 and 2009-10 2004-05 2009-10 26% 27% 53% 17% 4% 53% 16% 4% Haryana Rajasthan' UP NCT Delhi Haryana Rajasthan UP NCT Delhi Source: Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economic and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in The share of Delhi and Rajasthan sub regions in the GDP of NCR had remained constant during the period 2004-05 and 2009-10, whereas there had been slight change in the share of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh sub regions. While the share of Haryana sub region in NCR s GDP had gone up by 1 percent, the share of Uttar Pradesh sub region had gone down by 1 percent over the same period (Fig. 5.4). Table 5.6: Rate of Growth of GDP of the Sub-Regions (in %) Sub Region AAGR NCT Delhi 10.0 12.4 11.2 12.9 9.0 11.5 Haryana 12.9 10.8 10.5 8.5 16.4 12.4 Rajasthan 0.01 16.8 3.5 17.7 10.7 9.6 Uttar Pradesh 5.1 21.4 7.1 4.4 6.8 8.7 NCR 9.5 13.6 10 10.5 10.6 11.2 Source: Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economic and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in During the period 2005-06 to 2009-10, Haryana sub region recorded the highest average annual growth rate of GDP in the NCR followed by NCT Delhi while Uttar Pradesh sub-region had the lowest annual average growth rate (Table 5.6 and Fig. 5.5). Fig 5.5: Rate of growth of GDP in Different Sub Regions of NCR during 2004-05 to 2009-10 percentage 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% NCT Delhi Haryana Sub-region Rajasthan Sub-region Uttar Pradesh Sub-region NCR Source: Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economic and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in

44 Regional Plan 2021 During the period 2005-06 to 2009-10, Haryana sub region recorded the highest average annual growth rate of GDP in the NCR followed by NCT Delhi while Uttar Pradesh sub-region had the lowest annual average growth rate (Table 5.7). Table 5.7: Sub-Region wise Per Capita Income at Constant (2004-05) Prices (in Rs.) Sub Region 2004-05 NCT Delhi 63,877 69,128 76,243 83,243 91,845 98,262 Haryana 44,895 54,487 59,179 63,788 67,633 74,457 Rajasthan 20,721 20,423 23,522 23,638 27,030 29,300 Uttar Pradesh 25,540 25,685 31,745 32,608 33,271 35,036 NCR 38,758 42,431 47,672 50,819 54,945 59,264 Source: Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economic and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in NCT Delhi consistently recorded the highest per capita income, whereas Rajasthan sub region reported the lowest per capita income in the NCR (Table 5.8). Table 5.8: Rate of Growth of Per Capita Income of NCR Sub-Regions (in %) Sub Region AAGR NCT Delhi 8.2 10.3 9.2 10.3 7.0 9.0 Haryana 21.4 8.6 7.8 6.0 10.1 11.0 Rajasthan -1.4 15.2 0.5 14.3 8.4 6.9 Uttar Pradesh 0.6 23.6 2.7 2.0 5.3 6.2 NCR 9.5 12.4 6.6 8.1 7.9 8.8 Source: Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economic and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in During the period 2005-06 to 2009-10, Haryana subregion had the highest average annual rate of growth of per capita income followed by NCT Delhi while Uttar Pradesh sub-region had the lowest average annual growth rate of per capita income (Fig. 5.6). Box 5.3 The Average Annual Rate of Growth of GDP in all sub regions had been higher than the Average Annual Rate of Growth of Per Capita Income during 2004-05 to 2009-10. Fig 5.6: Rate of Growth of Per Capital Income in Different Sub-Regions of NCR during 2004-05 to 2009-10 25.0% 20.0% percentage 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% NCT Delhi Haryana Sub-region Rajasthan Sub-region Uttar Pradesh Sub-region NCR Source: Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13; Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana; Directorate of Economic and Statistics, Rajasthan; updes.up.nic.in 5.2.1 NCT Delhi NCT Delhi shows a consistent increase in both GDP and per capita income during the period 2004-05 to 2009-10. But the rate of growth of both these indicators declined in 2009-10 from 12.9 percent to 9.0 percent in case of GDP and from 10.3 percent to 7.0 percent in case of per capita income (Table 5.9 and Fig. 5.7).

Economic Scenario 45 Table 5.9: GDP and Per Capita Income of NCT Delhi at Constant (2004-05) Prices NCT Delhi 2004-05 GDP (Rs. in Lakh ) 1,00,32,452 1,10,40,607 1,24,07,958 1,37,96,086 1,55,79,109 1,69,83,898 Per Capita income (in Rs.) 63,877 69,128 76,243 83,243 91,845 98,262 Source: Economic Survey of Delhi. 2012-13 Fig. 5.7: Rate of Growth of GDP and Per Capita Income of NCT Delhi Annual Growth Rate of GDP (in %) Rate of Growth of GDP in India and in NCT Delhi 13 11 9 7 5 NCT Delhi India Source: CSO (National Account Statistics), Survey of Delhi, 2012-13 5.2.2 Haryana Sub-Region Annual growth rate of Per Capita Income (in %) Rate of Growth of Per Capita Income in India and NCT Delhi 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 2005-062006-072007-082008-092009-10 NCT Delhi India The Haryana sub region had shown a consistent increase in both its GDP and per capita income from 2004-05 to 2009-10. Table 5.10 shows the absolute values of GDP and per capita income over the same time period. Table 5.10: GDP and Per Capita Income of Haryana Sub Region at Constant (2004-05) Prices Haryana Sub Region 2004-05 GDP (Rs. in Lakh ) 49,68,182 56,06,600 62,14,479 68,65,661 74,49,249 86,67,303 Per Capita income (in Rs.) 44,895 54,487 59,179 63,788 67,633 74,457 Source: Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana Rate of growth of Gross Sub Region Domestic Product (GSDP) increased from 12.9 percent to 16.4 percent in the period 2004-05 to 2009-10 with a fall in growth rate of GSDP in 2008-09 (Table 5.6). The rate of growth of per capita income was significantly higher in 2005-06 and consequently declined in the following years. It was 21.4 percent in 2005-06 and 10.1 percent in 2009-10 (Table 5.8). This might be due to the huge increase in per capita income of Gurgaon (by 103%) from 2004 to 2005. Fig. 5.8 shows the change in the rate of growth of GDP and per capita income of Haryana Sub-Region. Fig 5.8: Rate of Growth of GDP and Per Capita Income of Haryana Sub-Region during the period 2005-06 to 2009-10 Annual Rate of Growth of GDP (in %) 18 13 8 3 Rate of Growth of GDP in India and Haryana Sub Region Haryana Sub Region India Annual Growth Rate of Per Capita Income (in %) Rate of Growth of Per Capita Income in India and Haryana Sub Region 23 18 13 8 3 Haryana Sub Region Source: CSO (National Account Statistics); Department of Economics and Statistical Analysis, Haryana India

46 Regional Plan 2021 Gurgaon recorded the highest GDP in the year 2009-10 followed by Faridabad district. Mewat had the lowest GDP (Annexure 5/I). Again Gurgaon district had recorded the highest per capita income which was significantly higher than the per capita income of other districts of Haryana subregion during the period 2004-05 to 2009-10. All other districts except Gurgaon and Faridabad with per capita income of Rs.2,29,208 and Rs.1,06,896 respectively, had per capita income below Rs. 80,000 during 2009-10 (Annexure 5/II). Mewat s per capita income was even lower than the country s per capita income. Fig 5.9: Share of Different Districts in GSDP in 2004-05 and in 2009-10 in Haryana Sub-Region 2004-05 Faridabad Sonipat 2009-10 Sonipat Rohtak (includes Rohtak 9% 10% 6% Palwal) Rewari 5% 22% 8% Rewari 9% Panipat 13% Jhajjar 6% Gurgaon (includes Mewat) 34% Source: Department of Economics and Statistical Analysis, Haryana Panipat 11% Palwal 5% Mewat 4% Jhajjar 5% Faridabad 22% Gurgaon 31% Fig. 5.9 shows the share of GDP of different districts of Haryana sub region in 2004-05 and 2009-10. The share of GDP of Gurgaon (+Mewat) and Faridabad (+Palwal) districts showed an increase in 2009-10. While the share of Sonepat, Rohtak, Rewari, Panipat, Jhajjar fell by 1 percent each. 5.2.3 Rajasthan Sub Region Alwar district showed a consistent increase in GDP and per capita income during 2004-05 to 2009-10 but the rate of growth of GDP and per capita income had been quite irregular. It had recorded per capita income of Rs. 29,300 in the year 2009-10, which was lower than almost all districts of Haryana sub region (except Mewat) but higher than almost all districts of Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region except Gautam Budh Nagar (Fig. 5.10 and Table 5.11). Table 5.11: GDP and Per Capita Income of Rajasthan Sub Region at Constant (2004-05) Prices Rajasthan Sub Region 2004-05 GDP (Rs. in Lakh ) 7,74,203 7,74,257 9,04,513 9,35,761 11,01,098 12,19,010 Per Capita income (in Rs.) 20,721 20,423 23,522 23,638 27,030 29,300 Source: Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Rajasthan Annual Rate of Growth of GDP (in %) 15 10 5 0 Fig 5.10: Rate of Growth of GDP and Per Capita Income in the period 2005-06 to 2009-10 Rate of Growth of GDP in India and Rajasthan Sub Region 20 Rajasthan Sub Region India Annual Growth Rate of Per Capita Income (in %) 13 8 3-2 Source: Source: CSO (National Account Statistics); Department of Economics and Statistics, Rajasthan Box 5.4 Since 2004-05, the Per Capita Income of Gurgaon was higher than NCT Delhi and by 2009-10, Faridabad s per capita income had surpassed Delhi s per capita income. Rate of Growth of Per Capita Income in India and Rajasthan Sub Region Rajasthan Sub Region India

Economic Scenario 47 5.2.4 Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region The temporal change in GSDP and the per capita income showed a consistent increase during the period 2004-05 to 2009-10 (Table 5.12). Table 5.12: GDP and Per Capita Income of Uttar Pradesh Sub Region at Constant (2004-05) Prices Uttar Pradesh Sub Region 2004-05 GDP (Rs. in Lakh ) 33,24,373 34,93,985 42,41,305 45,44,199 47,43,160 50,64,532 Per Capita income (in Rs.) 25,540 25,685 31,745 32,608 33,271 35,036 Source: updes.up.nic.in Annual Rate of Growth of GDP (in %) Fig. 5.11: Rate of Growth of GDP and Per Capita Income in the Period 2005-06 to 2009-10 Rate of Growth of Per Capita Income in India Rate of Growth of GDP in India and Uttar and Uttar Pradesh Sub Region Pradesh Sub Region 25 20 15 10 5 0 Uttar Pradesh Sub Region India Source: CSO (National Account Statistics); updes.up.nic.in Annual Growth Rate of Per Capita Income (in %) 25 20 15 10 5 0 Uttar Pradesh Sub Region The rate of growth of GSDP showed a sharp increase from 5.1 percent to 21.4 percent in 2006-07 and then again showed a decline in 2007-08 with marginal increase in the later period. The same trend was seen in the rate of growth of per capita income (from 0.6 percent in 2005-06 to 23.6 percent in 2006-07) and then declined (Fig. 5.11). The highest GDP in the UP sub region was recorded in Gautam Budh Nagar, which was 3.5 times that of Baghpat in 2009-10. In comparison to other districts, Ghaziabad (+Hapur) had displayed highest GDP till 2006-07, while GDP of Gautam Budh Nagar saw a spurt during the period 2006-07 and thereafter both Gautam Budh Nagar and Ghaziabad showed almost similar growth of GDP till 2008-09. The lowest GDP was that of Baghpat in 2004-05 and its rate of growth was also low (Annexure 5/III). Fig. 5.12: Share of GDP in 2004-05 and 2009-10 in Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region India Source: updes.up.nic.in Per capita income of Gautam Budh Nagar had been significantly higher than the per capita income of other districts of Uttar Pradesh sub region. In 2009-10, Gautambudh Nagar recorded the highest per capita income, almost double of any other district of the sub region, while Bulandshahar had lowest per capita income during the same period. All other districts except Gautambudh Nagar (with per capita income of Rs.71,960.92) had per capita income below Rs.30,000 (Annexure 5/IV) Box 5.5 Since 2004-05, there has been a difference between the Per Capita Income of Gautam Budh Nagar and Ghaziabad districts and the gap widened even further from 2006-07 onwards.

48 Regional Plan 2021 5.3 WORK FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE (WPR) As per 1991 Census, Alwar district of Rajasthan sub-region had the highest WPR of 40.4 in the NCR, followed by Gurgaon district of Haryana sub-region with WPR of 32.1, while Rewari district of Haryana sub region has the lowest WPR of 27.8. On the other hand, the highest male WPR was 51.7 in NCT Delhi followed by Meerut district (includes Baghpat) of Uttar Pradesh sub region and Panipat district (includes Sonepat) of Haryana sub region with 49.7 while Rewari district of Haryana sub-region had the lowest WPR of 42.7 (male). The highest and lowest WPR for female was 32 in Alwar district and 7.4 in NCT Delhi and Bulandshahr respectively (Annexure 5/V). In 2001 Census, Alwar District (Rajasthan) had the highest WPR of 48.7 in the NCR, followed by Rewari district (Haryana) with WPR of 43.6, while the least WPR of 28.5 was observed in Ghaziabad district of Uttar Pradesh. The highest WPR for male was 53.1 in Alwar and the lowest was 45.6 in Ghaziabad, whereas the highest and lowest WPR for female were 43.9 in Alwar and 8.6 in Ghaziabad. Though NCT Delhi had the second highest WPR for male (52.1), it also had the second lowest WPR for female (9.4) (Annexure 5/VI). As per 2011 Census, Alwar district of Rajasthan sub region recorded the highest WPR of 46.5 in NCR, followed by Rewari district of Haryana The female WPR of NCT Delhi sub region with 37.5 while Mewat district recorded the lowest WPR of was the lowest in NCR. The 26.6. On the other hand, the highest WPR for male was 53.0 in both difference between male and female WPR was highest in NCT NCT Delhi and Gurgaon (district of Haryana sub region) followed by Delhi over the last 3 decades. Alwar district with 51.3 while Mewat district of Haryana sub region recorded the lowest WPR for male (39.3). The highest and lowest WPR for female was 41.2 in Alwar and 10.6 in NCT Delhi respectively (Annexure 5/VII). 5.4 STRUCTURAL COMPOSITION OF WORK FORCE Box 5.6 Table 5.13: Structural Composition of Main Work Force in the NCR Year 1991 2001 Category of workers Main* Workers % Main Workers % Cultivators 17,90,347 23.2 22,45,185 21.0 Agricultural Labourers 8,21,188 10.6 4,64,110 4.3 Livestock, Forestry etc. 58,378 0.8 3,40,121 3.2 Mining and Quarrying 13,884 0.2 38,098 0.4 Sub-total (Primary Sector) 26,83,797 34.7 30,87,514 28.9 Manufacturing, Processing a) Household Industries 1,28,661 1.7 3,34,377 3.1 b) Other than household Industries 12,81,140 16.6 18,94,207 17.7 Construction 3,54,049 4.6 6,10,756 5.7 Sub-total (Secondary Sector) 17,63,850 22.8 28,39,340 26.6 Trade and Commerce 11,37,207 14.7 17,23,857 16.1 Transport, Storage and Communications 4,11,842 5.3 6,60,349 6.2 Other Services 17,34,993 22.4 23,75,809 22.2 Sub-total (Tertiary Sector) 32,84,042 42.5 47,60,015 44.5 Total Main Workers 77,31,689 1,06,86,869 Source: Census of India 1991 and 2001 *Note: Main Workers are those who engaged in any economically productive activity of 183 days or six months or more during the year (reference Census of India) (Detailed breakup of the structural composition of workforce for the 2011 census is expected in 2014 from Census of India) In NCR, the percentage of main workforce engaged in the primary sector showed a decline from 35 percent in 1991 to 29 percent in 2001, while the percentage of main workforce had increased for secondary and tertiary sector. For secondary sector it increased from 23 percent in 1991 to 27 percent in 2001 and for tertiary sector it increased from 42 percent in 1991 to 44 percent in 2001.

Economic Scenario 49 Fig 5.13: Comparison of Composition of Main Workers in NCR and India in 1991 & 2001 Source: Census of India 1991 and 2001 In 1991, the primary sector dominated the work force in India, while in the NCR the tertiary sector dominated the work force. This trend continued in 2001 as well. The share of primary sector declined both in India and in NCR but still it dominated the work force of India as a whole (Fig 5.13). 5.4.1 Sub Region-Wise Structural Composition of Work Force Table 5.14: Number of Main Workers employed in different sectors in NCR Sub Region 1991 2001 Total Total NCT Delhi 84,557 9,62,522 19,21,298 29,68,377 91,185 14,42,221 27,93,619 43,27,025 Haryana 9,84,714 3,27,750 5,73,284 18,85,748 10,90,134 6,10,032 7,94,707 24,94,873 Rajasthan 2,63,314 49,218 94,308 4,06,840 6,51,698 1,25,548 1,71,059 9,48,305 Uttar Pradesh 13,53,792 4,24,360 6,95,152 24,73,304 12,54,497 6,61,539 10,00,630 29,16,666 Source: Census of India, 1991 and 2001 NCT Delhi had the highest number of work force employed in the NCR while the lowest numbers of workers were employed in Rajasthan sub region both during 1991 and 2001 (Table 5.14 and Fig 5.14). Fig 5.14: Comparison of the Share of Main Workers in Different Sub-Regions of NCR in 1991 and 2001 Share of workers employed in different sub regions of NCR, 1991 Share of workers employed in different sub regions of NCR, 2001 32% 38% 27% 41% 25% 5% NCT Delhi Haryana Rajasthan UP Source: Census of India, 1991 & 2001 9% 23% NCT Delhi Haryana Rajasthan UP NCT Delhi had the maximum share of workers employed in the NCR. The share of workers employed in NCT Delhi went up from 38 percent to 41 percent and that of Rajasthan sub region had gone up from 5percent to 9 percent. The share of Haryana sub region and Uttar Pradesh sub region had gone down from 25 percent to 23 percent and 32 percent to 23 percent respectively. A. NCT Delhi According to Census data 1991 and 2001, the number of workers employed in all three sectors of NCT Delhi had gone up, but the share of workers employed in primary sector had gone down. The share of

50 Regional Plan 2021 workers employed in tertiary sector had remained constant while that employed in secondary sector had increased by 1 percent (Fig 5.15). Fig. 5.15: Comparison of Structural Composition of Main Workers in NCT Delhi NCT Delhi,1991 NCT Delhi, 2001 3% 2% 32% 33% 65% 65% Source: Census of India, 1991 & 2001 B. Haryana Sub-Region According to the Census data 1991 and 2001, although the number of workers employed in all three sectors of Haryana sub region had gone up, but the share of work force employed in primary sector had decreased and the share of work force employed in secondary and tertiary sector had increased (Fig. 5.16). Fig. 5.16: Comparison of Structural Composition of Main Workers in Haryana Sub-Region Haryana sub region, 1991 Haryana sub region, 2001 31% 52% 32% 44% 17% 24% Source: Census of India, 1991 & 2001 C. Rajasthan Sub-Region Majority of the population in this sub region was employed in primary sector which was more than five times than that of workers employed in secondary sector. The number of workers employed in all three sectors had gone up, but the share of workers employed in tertiary sector had gone down from 23 percent in 1991 to 18 percent in 2001 (Fig. 5.17). Fig. 5.17: Comparison of Structural Composition of Main Workers in Rajasthan Sub-Region Rajathan sub region, 1991 Rajasthan sub region 2001 12% 23% 65% 13% 18% 69% Source: Census of India, 1991 & 2001 D. Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region In the Uttar Pradesh sub region, the share of workers employed in primary sector decreased from 55 percent in 1991 to 43 percent in 2001. The number of workers employed in the secondary and tertiary sector increased. The share of secondary sector workers increased from 17 percent in 1991 to 23 percent in 2001 and that of tertiary sector workers increased from 28 percent in 1991 to 34 percent in 2001 (Fig. 5.18).

Economic Scenario 51 Fig. 5.18: Comparison of Structural Composition of Main Workers in Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region Uttar Pradesh sub region, 1991 Uttar Pradesh sub region, 2001 17% 28% 55% 34% 23% 43% Source: Census of India, 1991 & 2001 5.5 FINANCIAL INCLUSION The objective of financial inclusion is to extend financial services to the unserved population which is an important tool to unlock a region s growth potential. According to 2011 Census of India, 71.5 percent of households avail banking services in NCR, while the all India figure is 58.7 percent (Table 5.15). Table 5.15: Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services in NCR Area Total No. of Households Total No. of Households Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services Availing Banking Services India 24,66,92,667 14,48,14,788 58.7 NCR 86,72,889 62,04,024 71.5 Source: Census of India, 2011 Table 5.16: Sub-Region wise Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services Sub Region Total No. of Households Total No. of Households Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services Availing Banking Services NCT Delhi 33,40,538 25,95,302 77.7 Haryana 20,44,045 14,20,497 69.5 Rajasthan 6,28,913 3,74,196 59.5 Uttar Pradesh 26,59,393 18,14,029 68.2 Source: Census of India, 2011 Among the NCR sub region, NCT Delhi had the highest percentage of households availing banking facilities, followed by Haryana, while the least was shown by Rajasthan Sub-Region. 5.5.1 Sub Region-Wise Analysis A. NCT Delhi In NCT Delhi, 77.7 percent of households availed banking services. B. Haryana Sub-Region In Haryana sub region, 69.5 percent of Households Availed banking services (Table 5.17). Table 5.17: Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services in Different Districts of Haryana Sub-Region District Total No. of Households Total No. of Households Availing Banking Services Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services Faridabad 3,53,066 2,50,876 71.1 Gurgaon 3,20,642 2,50,865 78.2 Jhajjar 1,83,400 1,36,104 74.2 Mewat 1,57,020 64,127 40.8 Palwal 1,67,810 1,00,598 59.9 Panipat 2,20,388 1,39,754 63.4 Rewari 1,69,128 1,34,978 79.8 Rohtak 2,02,933 1,51,930 74.9 Sonepat 2,69,658 1,91,265 70.9 Source: Census of India, 2011

52 Regional Plan 2021 The percentage of households availing banking services in Rewari district was almost twice in comparison to Mewat district. The highest percentage of households availing banking services in Haryana sub region was in Rewari district followed by Gurgaon district (Fig. 5.19 and Fig. 5.20). Fig. 5.19: Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services in Different Districts of Haryana Sub-Region Fig. 5.20: Share of Different Districts Availing Banking Services in Haryana Sub-Region 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% Source: Census of India, 2011 The maximum number of households availing banking services was in Faridabad district which was 3.9 times more than that in Mewat district. The maximum percentage of households availing banking services was in Rewari. C. Rajasthan Sub-Region In Rajasthan Sub-Region, 59.5 percent households availed the banking services. D. Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region In the Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region, Gautam Budh Nagar district showed the highest percent (74.9%) of households availing banking facilities. On the other hand, Bulandshahr district showed the lowest percentage of households availing banking facilities (Table 5.18 and Fig. 5.21). Table 5.18: Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services in Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region District Panipat Sonipat Rohtak Jhajjar Rewari Gurgaon Mewat Faridabad Palwal Total No. of Households Total No. of Households Availing Banking Services Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services Meerut 5,68,745 3,88,224 68.3 Baghpat 2,07,090 1,48,047 71.5 Ghaziabad 8,29,843 5,70,969 68.8 Hapur 1,54,761 1,00,144 64.7 Gautambudh Nagar 3,16,278 2,37,030 74.9 Bulandshahr 5,82,676 3,69,615 63.4 Source: Census of India 2011 Figure 5.22 shows the share of households availing banking service in different districts of Uttar Pradesh sub region. Ghaziabad had the highest share of 32 percent, while Hapur showed the least share at 6 percent. Fig. 5.21: Percentage of Households Availing Banking Services in Different Districts of Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region Rewari 9% Fig. 5.22: Share of Different Districts Availing Banking Services in Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region Bulandshahr 20% Rohtak 11% Sonipat 13% Panipat 10% Palwal 7% Faridabad 18% Mewat 4% Jhajjar 10% Meerut 21% Gurgaon 18% Source: Census of India, 2011 Gautambudh Nagar 13% Hapur 6% Ghaziabad 32% Baghpat 8%

Economic Scenario 53 Box 5.7 It is interesting to note that districts having low per capita income also have a lower percentage of households availing banking services. In Haryana sub region, Mewat district had the lowest per capita income and the least percentage of households availing banking services. In Uttar Pradesh sub region, Bulandshahr district had the lowest per capita income and also the lowest percentage of households availing banking services. 5.6 FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT According to RBI data, the RBI Office in Delhi which collates information pertaining to FDI has reported that Delhi (which includes New Delhi and part of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh) had been the second highest recipient of FDI inflows (21.9 percent) after Maharashtra (26.2 percent) in 2011-12. Since district wise data for FDI was not available, district-wise analysis could not be undertaken. 5.7 POLICY AND PROPOSALS The key rationale behind the formation of NCR was to promote balanced growth and harmonized development of the region and focus should be on making the metros and regional centres have their own influence region. i) Comparison of per capita income of different districts of NCR excluding Delhi reveals that Bulandshahr, Meerut and Ghaziabad in Uttar Pradesh sub region, followed by Mewat in Haryana sub region are among the districts having lower per capita income, while Gurgaon and Faridabad s per capita income is higher than Delhi. NCR Planning Board has been lending on an average of Rs 240 crore per year to participating states for physical infrastructure development. As analysed in chapter 19, funding has been largely in favour of Haryana sub region. In view of lower per capita income and low levels of work force in secondary sector, there is a case for increased funding in Bulandshahr and Mewat. Baghpat s contribution to NCR s GDP is the lowest and hence physical and social infrastructure needs a boost in this district. Baghpat has remained the only district in the NCR which has not received NCRPB s funding. ii) Employment in the secondary and tertiary sectors in NCR is constrained by the issues of skill development of the work force. Therefore, there is a need for new projects with focus on skill development and vocational training. iii) Connectivity within NCR has been the driving force for the change in both the size and nature of economic activities in NCR. RRTS project has the potential to improve the growth prospects and income in the entire region especially of the towns not part of CNCR. iv) The analysis of banking facilities in NCR clearly brings out that districts with low per capita income are also the districts where the banking facilities are either not available or not availed of. Provision of banking services such as soft loans and micro financing can help in improving the economic base of an area provided the potential beneficiaries are aware of these services. The banking sector therefore, should not only focus on expanding its network but also emphasise on creating awareness, regarding the spectrum of services available. Mewat in Haryana sub region and Bulandshahr in Uttar Pradesh sub region are two districts as a case in point where greater financial inclusion can bring out huge difference. It is pertinent to correlate that as per 2001 Census Bulandshahr district of Uttar Pradesh sub region had contributed the maximum in-migration to Delhi during the decade of 1991 to 2001. v) The three investment regions under the proposed DMIC project namely Manesar-Bawal Investment Region (MBIR), Khushkhera-Bhiwadi-Neemrana Investment Region (KBNIR) and Dadri-Noida- Ghaziabad Investment Region (DNGIR) and the DFC project have the potential to boost the manufacturing sector both in terms of output and employment. These projects emphasise on expanding the manufacturing and services base and develop the corridor stretches as Global Manufacturing and Trading Hubs.

54 Regional Plan 2021 ANNEXURE 5/I: District-wise GDP of Haryana Sub-Region at Constant (2004-05) Prices (Rs. in Lakh) District 2004-05 Faridabad 11,13,513 12,17,759 13,63,628 15,12,891 16,24,838 19,00,146 Gurgaon 16,69,844 18,08,640 20,21,670 22,74,935 24,24,178 26,99,055 Jhajjar 2,83,563 3,07,571 3,42,527 3,68,613 4,01,570 4,49,479 Mewat - 2,06,374 2,19,339 2,33,629 2,79,194 2,99,678 Palwal - - - - - 4,25,465 Panipat 6,56,410 7,21,705 7,90,528 8,83,342 10,08,213 9,92,975 Rewari 4,36,238 4,71,549 5,16,463 5,62,065 6,04,654 6,59,306 Rohtak 3,24,472 3,45,657 3,75,929 4,01,207 4,19,308 4,70,523 Sonepat 4,84,142 5,27,345 5,84,395 6,28,979 6,87,294 7,70,676 Haryana Sub Region 49,68,182 56,06,600 62,14,479 68,65,661 74,49,249 86,67,303 Source: Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana ANNEXURE 5/II: District-wise Per Capita Income of Haryana Sub-Region at Constant (2004-05) Prices (in Rs.) District 2004-05 Faridabad 41,590 49,408 54,359 58,882 61,787 1,06,896 Gurgaon 81,478 1,65,878 1,81,730 1,99,095 2,06,817 2,29,208 Jhajjar 26,820 28,525 31,238 32,824 35,032 38,665 Mewat - 17,715 17,764 18,529 21,706 27,327 Palwal - - - - - 41,658 Panipat 57,436 61,273 66,607 73,095 81,678 79,047 Rewari 46,259 50,036 52,634 55,463 58,120 63,075 Rohtak 28,959 29,624 32,219 33,665 34,429 38,167 Sonepat 31,723 33,441 36,879 38,747 41,496 46,071 Haryana Sub Region 44,895 54,487 59,179 63,788 67,633 74,457 Source: Department of Economic and Statistical Analysis, Haryana ANNEXURE 5/III: District-wise GDP of Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region at Constant (2004-05) Prices (Rs. in Lakh) District 2004-05 Meerut 7,17,606 8,15,989.4 8,57,391.6 9,17,413.9 9,38,593.6 10,12,545.6 Baghpat 2,90,727 2,85,506.9 3,06,756.1 3,28,782.4 3,47,214.8 3,84,261.6 Ghaziabad + Hapur 8,92,713.8 9,76,843.5 11,60,727.5 12,47,856.7 13,12,838.8 13,64,759 Gautambudhnagar 7,35,330.4 7,52,761.9 11,73,018.8 12,62,899.4 13,11,139.7 14,15,570.6 Bulandshahr 6,87,995.6 6,62,883.4 7,43,410.9 7,87,246.5 8,33,373.5 8,87,395 Uttar Pradesh Sub Region 33,24,372.8 34,93,985 42,41,304.9 45,44,199 47,43,160.4 50,64,531.9 Source: updes.up.nic.in ANNEXURE 5/IV: District-wise Per Capita Income of Uttar Pradesh Sub-Region at Constant (2004-05) Price (in Rs.) District 2004-05 Meerut 19,946.28 22,148.51 22,925.14 23,923.94 24,043.62 25,536.35 Baghpat 21,779.58 21,090.75 2,2471.8 23,776.14 24,937.65 27,348.2 Ghaziabad + Hapur 20,775.18 21,863.16 25,032.36 25,637.83 26,109.19 26,426.39 Gautambudh Nagar 45,148.22 44,420.84 67,374.48 67,961.93 68,516.28 71,960.92 Bulandshahr 20,051.06 18,903.35 20,922.42 21,737.87 22,750.01 23,909.02 Uttar Pradesh Sub Region 25,540.06 25,685.32 31,745.24 32,607.54 33,271.35 35,036.18 Source: updes.up.nic.in

Economic Scenario 55 ANNEXURE 5/V: Work Force Participation Rate, 1991 District Total Workers Work Force Participation Ratio Male Female Male Female Total NCT Delhi 26,66,385 314,076 51.7 7.4 31.6 Haryana Sub Region Faridabad (+Palwal) 3,88,524 59,634 48.1 8.9 30.3 Gurgaon (+Mewat) 2,84,976 82,467 46.5 15.5 32.1 Rewari 1,38,195 34,996 42.7 11.7 27.8 Rohtak (+ Jhajjar) 4,57,243 1,10,998 46.8 13.3 31.4 Panipat (+Sonepat) 2,22,788 29,362 49.6 7.6 30.3 Rajasthan Sub Region Alwar 5,83,448 3,43,668 47.8 32 40.4 Uttar Pradesh Sub Region Bulandshahr 7,28,085 97,534 47.4 7.4 29 Ghaziabad (+Hapur) 7,12,141 1,05,372 48.2 8.6 30.5 Meerut (+ Baghpat) 9,25,105 1,26,920 49.7 8 30.5 Source: Census of India, 1991 ANNEXURE 5/VI: Work Force Participation Rate, 2001 District Total Workers Work Force Participation Ratio Male Female Male Female Total NCT Delhi 39,60,101 5,85,133 52.1 9.4 32.8 Haryana Sub Region Faridabad (+Palwal) 5,76,478 2,09,284 48.3 20.9 35.8 Jhajjar 2,44,809 1,43,906 51.4 35.7 44.2 Gurgaon (+ Mewat) 4,15,177 2,14,481 46.8 27.7 37.9 Rewari 2,00,400 1,33,222 49.7 36.8 43.6 Rohtak 2,51,096 1,19,977 49.3 27.8 39.5 Sonepat 3,45,450 1,77,581 49.7 30.4 40.9 Rajasthan Sub Region Alwar 8,41,811 6,16,875 53.1 43.9 48.7 Uttar Pradesh Sub Region Baghpat 2,99,475 80,835 47.5 15.1 32.7 Bulandshahr 7,88,883 3,84,922 50.9 28.2 40.3 GautamBudha Nagar 3,03,938 59,876 46.6 10.9 30.3 Ghaziabad (+Hapur) 45.6 8.6 28.5 Meerut 7,46,084 1,49,772 46.6 10.7 29.9 Source: Census of India 2001 ANNEXURE 5/VII: Work Force Participation Rate, 2011 District Total Workers Work Force Participation Ratio Male Female Male Female Total NCT Delhi 47,62,026 8,25,023 53 10.6 33.2 Haryana Sub Region Faridabad 4,76,933 1,02,296 49.4 12.1 32 Gurgaon 4,32,456 1,12,260 53 16.1 36 Rewari 2,35,326 1,02,401 49.6 24 37.5 Rohtak 2,72,646 73,321 48 14.9 32.6 Sonepat 3,91,085 1,32,094 50.1 19.8 36.1 Panipat 3,28,667 83,651 50.8 15 34.2 Jhajjar 2,50,020 76,514 48.6 17.2 34.1 Mewat 2,24,642 65,322 39.3 12.6 26.6 Palwal 2,41,464 68,099 43.5 13.9 29.3 Rajasthan Sub Region Alwar 9,94,171 7,14,371 51.3 41.2 46.5 Uttar Pradesh Sub Region Baghpat 3,42,604 74,091 48.9 12.3 32 Bulandshahar 8,97,815 2,75,445 48.7 16.7 33.5 Gautam Buddha Nagar 4,43,384 1,25,725 49.8 16.6 34.5 Ghaziabad (+Hapur) 12,31,615 2,88,923 49.5 13.2 32.5 Meerut 8,98,810 1,91,729 49.2 11.9 31.7 Source: Census of India, 2001.