School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Similar documents
Shelters Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

12-month Enrollment

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Raw Data Files Instructions

Educational Attainment

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Best Colleges Main Survey

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

University of Arizona

John F. Kennedy Middle School

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Hokulani Elementary School


Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

State of New Jersey

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Rural Education in Oregon

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

46 Children s Defense Fund

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

Bellehaven Elementary

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Kahului Elementary School

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

El Toro Elementary School

World s Best Workforce Plan

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

School Data Profile/Analysis

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Legacy of NAACP Salary equalization suits.

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Transportation Equity Analysis

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Testing Schedule. Explained

Executive Summary. Hamilton High School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

Updated: December Educational Attainment

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

African American Male Achievement Update

Clark Lane Middle School

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Proficiency Illusion

Trends & Issues Report

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

West Haven School District English Language Learners Program

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Transcription:

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter February 23, 27 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the Annual Education Report (AER) which provides key information on the 26-7 educational progress for the Zemmer Campus 8/9 Building. The AER addresses the complex reporting information required by federal and state laws. The school s report contains information about student assessment, accountability, and teacher quality. If you have any questions about the AER, please contact Mrs. Amy Maruca for assistance. The AER is available for you to review electronically by visiting the following web site http://www.lapeerschools.org/cms/one.aspx?portalid=397475&pageid= or you may review a copy in the main office at your child s school. For the 26-7 year, no new Priority or Focus schools were named; some Priority or Focus schools did exit their status because they met the exit criteria. New Reward schools were identified using school rankings and Beating the Odds information. A Focus school is one that has a large achievement gap between the highest and lowest achieving 3% of schools. A Priority school is one whose achievement and growth is in the lowest 5% of all schools in the state. A Reward school is one that has achieved one or more of the following distinctions: top 5% of schools on the Top-to-Bottom School Rankings, top 5% of schools making the greatest gains in achievement (improvement metric), or Beating the Odds by outperforming the school s predicted ranking and/or similar schools. Some schools are not identified with any of these labels. In these cases no label is given. Our school has not been given one of these labels.

In reviewing the data in the combined report, several celebrations and challenges have been identified based on the results of Building in relation to the state. The primary celebration would be the performance of 9 th graders on the PSAT 8/9 in both the fall and spring test; these students outperformed 9 th grade classes throughout the county in both Evidence-Based Reading and Writing and. On the M-STEP results, Zemmer 8 th graders improved on the previous year s performance in reading and math. The primary challenge is improving of student performance in 8 th grade math. To address these issues, our school improvement plan has been developed to provide training to staff through differentiating our instructional practices to meet student needs and supporting that training through learning coach goals with staff in the classroom. Additionally, we intend to improve our professional learning communities to focus on student learning, growth, and lesson design. Zemmer has undertaken several key initiatives to accelerate student achievement and close the achievement gap. Extended School Day Advancement Opportunities School Improvement Process Full day Professional Development and Data Days Professional Learning Communities Adolescent Accelerated Reading Initiative After School Intervention Support in Reading and Math Summer School Programs Online Advancement and Remediation I-Connect Reading Initiative I-Connect Academic Support Initiative Year-Round School Calendar State law requires that we also report additional information. 2

PROCESS FOR ASSIGNING PUPILS TO THE SCHOOL All students in grades 8-9 in Lapeer Community Schools attend Zemmer Campus. The only exception to this assignment is those students who choose to attend the Alternative Program based on their academic needs. THE STATUS OF THE 3-5 YEAR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Goal Statement: All students at Zemmer Campus will be proficient in reading. % of 8 th graders will increase 6 points on NWEA reading from fall to spring. % of 9 th graders will meet the college benchmark score on the PSAT in reading. Student Goal Statement: All students will demonstrate improved proficiency in mathematics. % of 8 th graders will increase 4 points on NWEA mathematics from fall to spring. % of 9 th graders will meet the college benchmark score on the PSAT in reading. Student Goal Statement: All students will demonstrate proficiency in writing. % of all students will demonstrate proficiency on a common writing assignment or final assessment in. SPECIALIZED SCHOOLS IN THE DISTRICT Specialized schools provide alternative educational opportunities for students on either a part-time or full-time basis. In addition to the regular K-2 program provided by Lapeer Community Schools, the district has students attending five specialized school programs: Special education for the most severely handicapped students, Community High School, Lapeer County Educational and Technical Center 3

and two options utilizing the Year-Round calendar at both the K-5 and 6-8 grade levels. The Lapeer Intermediate School District offers programs for the most severe mentally, physically and emotionally impaired students. Most of these programs are housed at the Lapeer County Educational and Technical Center. Lapeer Community High School serves at-risk youths ages 4-8 in an alternative environment. The school provides a curriculum designed to develop employability and social skills as well as academic skills. A range of services address problems such as poor attendance, poor academic performance and behavioral issues. The Center for Innovation at the West Campus is a program that will offer series of project based learning classes, a Project Lead the Way science program for students in grades 6-2, college on campus courses, and other programs. Many students in grades 6-2 will opt to spend a portion of their day at the CFI campus in order to take advantage of these many educational options. The Lapeer County Educational and Technical Center provides vocational education and related services to high school students from all of the county high schools. in the 5 programs learn job specific skills to help them prepare for employment upon graduation. They also learn academic skills in an applied setting. Lapeer Community School s Year-Round Middle School is a program for students in grades 6-8 that operates on a balanced calendar. attend school the same number of days as traditional calendar students, but have a shorter summer break and more frequent week-long breaks during the school year. This program is housed at Rolland-Warner Campus 6/7 building during August. in grades 6-8 will begin their year on this campus and then students in grade 8 will relocate to the Zemmer 8/9 campus in September. Approximately 2 students participated in the Year-Round Middle School program this past school year. Turrill Year-Round Elementary School is a program for students in grades E5-5 that operates on a balanced calendar. attend school the same number of days as traditional calendar students, but have a shorter summer break and more frequent week -long breaks during the school year. During these week-long breaks, students can opt to attend intercession camps for a nominal fee. Turrill has over 45 students that take advantage of this option for their elementary school years. 4

Core Curriculum The core curriculum of Lapeer Community Schools is modeled after the Michigan Department of Education s (MDE) K-2 Curriculum and Standards. Our teachers have developed and continue to work on pacing guides, lesson plans and assessments to align with MDE grade or course level specific expectations. To access the core curriculum online, visit http://www.mich.gov/mde; click on Curriculum & Instruction on the menu, and then select Grade Level or High School Expectations. STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT RESULTS In addition to the state testing data that can be found in our district AER report or in the MiSchoolData report, Zemmer also has information from local assessments. 8 th Grade students took the NWEA-MAPS suite of tests at the beginning and the end of the school year. Our school uses the standard growth model provided by NWEA-MAPS as our model for meeting our growth goal. 8 th Grade MAPS 24-5 25-6 Avg. Score Avg. Growth Avg. Score Avg. Growth READING 29.34 3.44 29. 2.9 5

MATH 229 3.3 226.3 2.2 Our 8 th grade students also participated in the state-mandated MSTEP test suite. 9 th Grade- Our 9 th grades students took the PSAT 8/9. MSTEP 24-5 Proficiency 25-6 Proficiency MATH 4% 7% 4% 37% 32% 23% PSAT Evidence Based Reading and Writing Fall 26 Scores/ % meeting benchmark 456/73% 437/48% PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES During the 24-5 school year, Zemmer conducted two sets of parent- teacher conferences. One during the fall and one in the spring. The fall conferences took place over two evenings while the winter conferences took place on one night. 6

Year Fall Winter % Parents % Parents 24-5 4% 25% 25-6 43% 22% In closing, Building, is continuing to work and grow in meeting the needs of all of our students. We are continually looking for ways to not only meet the needs of our struggling students, but to help all students grow. Our overall goal is to continue striving to close our achievement gaps and to move all of our students towards proficiency and beyond. Our dedicated staff combined with quality curriculum and instruction is working to meet the needs of all of our students. With a continued focus on improving instruction and curriculum I look forward to see the long-term growth and success at Zemmer Campus. Sincerely, Amy Maruca Principal 7

/3/27 M-STEP Grades 3- Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Proficient District Proficient School Proficient Advanced Proficient Partially Proficient Not Proficient All 24-5 47.6% 4.8% 4.8% 4.5% 36.3% 29.3% 3.% All 25-6 48.9% 37.% 37.% 6.7% 3.4% 35.2% 27.7% Indian or Alaska Native 24-5 34.8% < < < < < < Asian 24-5 7.4% < < < < < < Asian 25-6 73.6% < < < < < < Black or African 24-5 23.7% < < < < < < Black or African 25-6 24.4% < < < < < < Hispanic of Any Race 24-5 36.2% < < < < < < Hispanic of Any Race 25-6 35.2% 3.8% 3.8%.% 3.8% 46.2% 23.% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 25-6 49.4% < < < < < < Two or More Races 24-5 44.7% < < < < < < A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page of 27

/3/27 M-STEP Grades 3- Two or More Races 25-6 47.8% 4.7% 4.7% 8.3% 33.3% 25.% 33.3% White 24-5 53.8% 4.3% 4.3% 4.5% 36.8% 29.4% 29.4% White 25-6 55.2% 37.5% 37.5% 7.% 3.5% 34.9% 27.6% Female 24-5 54.2% 5.7% 5.7% 5.5% 45.2% 28.6% 2.7% Female 25-6 54.9% 45.% 45.% 9.8% 35.2% 34.7% 2.2% Male 24-5 4.2% 29.% 29.% 3.3% 25.7% 3.% 4.% Male 25-6 43.% 28.6% 28.6% 3.3% 25.3% 35.7% 35.7% 24-5 3.8% 29.% 29.%.6% 27.5% 3.% 4.9% 25-6 32.5% 3.9% 3.9% 2.8% 28.2% 35.9% 33.% English Language Learners 24-5 9.3% < < < < < < English Language Learners 25-6 7.3% < < < < < < With Disabilities 24-5 9.8% 2.3% 2.3%.% 2.3% 7.% 9.7% With Disabilities 25-6.6% 5.9% 5.9%.% 5.9% 23.5% 7.6% All 24-5 32.2% 4.% 4.% 3.8%.3% 36.8% 49.% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 27

/3/27 M-STEP Grades 3- All 25-6 32.7% 7.2% 7.2% 5.3%.9% 27.8% 55.% Indian or Alaska Native 24-5 9.8% < < < < < < Asian 24-5 65.5% < < < < < < Asian 25-6 67.6% < < < < < < Black or African 24-5 9.7% < < < < < < Black or African 25-6 9.9% < < < < < < Hispanic of Any Race 24-5 8.9% < < < < < < Hispanic of Any Race 25-6 8.6% 7.7% 7.7%.% 7.7% 3.8% 6.5% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 25-6 34.6% < < < < < < Two or More Races 24-5 28.5% < < < < < < Two or More Races 25-6 29.8% 25.% 25.%.% 25.% 33.3% 4.7% White 24-5 37.7% 4.% 4.% 4.%.% 37.9% 48.% White 25-6 38.3% 7.3% 7.3% 5.5%.8% 27.7% 55.% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 27

/3/27 M-STEP Grades 3- Female 24-5 32.6% 5.7% 5.7% 4.6%.% 4.3% 44.% Female 25-6 34.% 5.4% 5.4% 4.%.3% 32.3% 52.3% Male 24-5 3.8% 2.% 2.% 2.7% 9.3% 32.8% 55.2% Male 25-6 3.4% 9.% 9.% 6.6% 2.6% 23.% 57.9% 24-5 7.% 8.8% 8.8%.% 7.8% 3.6% 59.6% 25-6 6.7% 3.7% 3.7% 2.7%.% 26.4% 59.9% English Language Learners 24-5 2.2% < < < < < < English Language Learners 25-6.8% < < < < < < With Disabilities 24-5 5.%.%.%.%.% 4.8% 95.2% With Disabilities 25-6 5.3% 2.9% 2.9%.% 2.9% 2.9% 94.3% All 24-5 29.7% 3.6% 3.6%.3% 3.3% 45.4% 23.% All 25-6 29.3% 23.4% 23.4% 3.4% 9.9% 47.2% 29.4% Indian or Alaska Native 24-5 9.4% < < < < < < Asian 24-5 5.9% < < < < < < A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 4 of 27

/3/27 M-STEP Grades 3- Asian 25-6 53.8% < < < < < < Black or African 24-5 9.% < < < < < < Black or African 25-6 9.3% < < < < < < Hispanic of Any Race 24-5 8.% < < < < < < Hispanic of Any Race 25-6 8.% 23.% 23.%.% 23.% 38.5% 38.5% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 25-6 32.9% < < < < < < Two or More Races 24-5 26.7% < < < < < < Two or More Races 25-6 28.7% 33.3% 33.3% 8.3% 25.% 33.3% 33.3% White 24-5 35.2% 32.6% 32.6%.3% 3.3% 44.6% 22.8% White 25-6 34.3% 23.% 23.% 3.4% 9.7% 48.% 28.9% Female 24-5 25.2% 25.5% 25.5%.5% 25.% 5.5% 24.% Female 25-6 26.% 9.5% 9.5% 2.6% 6.9% 49.2% 3.3% Male 24-5 34.% 38.8% 38.8% 2.2% 36.6% 39.3% 2.9% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 5 of 27

/3/27 M-STEP Grades 3- Male 25-6 32.6% 27.4% 27.4% 4.3% 23.% 45.2% 27.4% 24-5 5.9% 24.% 24.%.% 24.% 42.7% 33.3% 25-6 5.8% 8.4% 8.4% 2.7% 5.7% 43.8% 37.8% English Language Learners 24-5 5.8% < < < < < < English Language Learners 25-6 7.2% < < < < < < With Disabilities 24-5 7.3% 2.3% 2.3%.% 2.3% 25.6% 72.% With Disabilities 25-6 7.6% 5.6% 5.6% 2.8% 2.8% 27.8% 66.7% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 6 of 27

/3/27 SAT Location Name School Year Subject Student Group Mean SAT Score Benchmark Met or Exceeded % Met or Exceeded Did Not Meet % Did Not Meet Number Assessed No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 7 of 27

/3/27 MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Proficient District Proficient School Proficient Surpassed Attained Emerging Science Science Science 7th Grade 7th Grade 7th Grade 7th Grade 7th Grade 7th Grade All 24-5 68.8% < < < < < All 24-5 5.8% < < < < < White 24-5 7.8% < < < < < White 24-5 57.6% < < < < < Male 24-5 66.6% < < < < < Male 24-5 54.8% < < < < < 7th Grade 24-5 69.8% < < < < < Science 7th Grade 24-5 52.4% < < < < < All 24-5 84.4% < < < < < All 25-6 88.2% < < < < < All 24-5 65.2% < < < < < All 25-6 64.5% < < < < < All 24-5 43.7% < < < < < A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 8 of 27

/3/27 MI-Access Functional Independence All 25-6 43.3% < < < < < White 24-5 86.2% < < < < < White 25-6 88.5% < < < < < White 24-5 67.% < < < < < White 25-6 68.3% < < < < < White 24-5 46.% < < < < < White 25-6 45.7% < < < < < Female 25-6 9.9% < < < < < Female 24-5 6.3% < < < < < Female 25-6 6.5% < < < < < Female 25-6 45.3% < < < < < Male 24-5 82.8% < < < < < Male 25-6 86.% < < < < < Male 24-5 67.8% < < < < < Male 25-6 66.3% < < < < < A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 9 of 27

/3/27 MI-Access Functional Independence Male 24-5 43.9% < < < < < Male 25-6 42.2% < < < < < 24-5 84.3% < < < < < 25-6 89.% < < < < < 24-5 67.% < < < < < 25-6 66.3% < < < < < 24-5 44.% < < < < < 25-6 43.9% < < < < < A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page of 27

/3/27 MI-Access Supported Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Proficient District Proficient School Proficient Surpassed Attained Emerging All 24-5 8.9% < < < < < All 24-5 8.% < < < < < White 24-5 82.6% < < < < < White 24-5 82.8% < < < < < Female 24-5 8.3% < < < < < Female 24-5 8.5% < < < < < 24-5 8.% < < < < < 24-5 8.2% < < < < < A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page of 27

/3/27 MI-Access Participation Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Proficient District Proficient School Proficient Surpassed Attained Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 27

/3/27 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Proficient District Tested Total District Proficient* School Tested Total School Proficient** All 98.7% 69.6% 98.8% 67.6% 98.2% 6.8% All 98.6% 62.% 98.6% 57.5% 99.% 4.4% All Science 98.% 5.% 98.5% 53.% N/A N/A All 98.% 59.3% 98.2% 63.6% 99.2% 6.2% Bottom 3% N/A 25.% N/A.% N/A 8.3% Bottom 3% N/A 9.% N/A 2.% N/A 8.2% Bottom 3% Science N/A 9.8% N/A 8.3% N/A N/A Bottom 3% N/A 3.3% N/A.5% N/A 7.2% Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native 98.4% 63.4% <3 <3 N/A N/A 98.4% 55.9% <3 <3 N/A N/A Science 98.% 46.3% <3 <3 N/A N/A 97.3% 54.5% <3 <3 N/A N/A Asian 99.3% 84.3% <3 <3 <3 <3 Asian 99.4% 83.7% <3 <3 <3 <3 Asian Science 99.3% 65.5% <3 <3 N/A N/A Asian 99.3% 76.% <3 <3 <3 <3 Black or African Black or African Black or African Black or African Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race 97.7% 46.9% <3 <3 <3 <3 97.4% 37.3% <3 <3 <3 <3 Science 96.5% 23.9% <3 <3 N/A N/A 96.6% 33.6% <3 <3 <3 <3 98.8% 6.8% 98.8% 69.7% <3 <3 98.8% 5.% 98.8% 5.% <3 <3 Science 98.% 36.7% 97.6% 47.5% N/A N/A A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 27

/3/27 Accountability Details Subject Data Hispanic of Any Race Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races 98.% 47.7%.% 56.3% <3 <3 99.5% 72.4% <3 <3 <3 <3 99.7% 65.9% <3 <3 <3 <3 Science 99.7% 59.6% N/A N/A N/A N/A 99.6% 65.7% <3 <3 <3 <3 98.9% 67.8% 96.% 52.2% <3 <3 98.7% 59.2% 96.% 53.6% <3 <3 Science 98.5% 45.2% 96.7% <3 N/A N/A 98.5% 57.3% <3 <3 <3 <3 White 99.% 75.6% 98.9% 67.9% 98.% 6.4% White 98.9% 68.4% 98.7% 57.9% 98.9% 42.% White Science 98.6% 57.% 98.7% 53.6% N/A N/A White 98.5% 65.8% 98.2% 63.9% 99.2% 6.5% English Language Learners English Language Learners 98.3% 56.8% 98.3% 59.2% 97.9% 55.8% 98.2% 48.5% 98.% 5.% 98.4% 4.6% Science 97.5% 35.% 98.% 43.6% N/A N/A 97.5% 43.9% 98.% 5.6% 98.9% 54.8% 98.8% 49.5% <3 <3 <3 <3 99.% 48.4% <3 <3 <3 <3 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 4 of 27

/3/27 Accountability Details Subject Data English Language Learners English Language Learners With Disabilities With Disabilities With Disabilities With Disabilities Science 98.5% 22.% <3 <3 N/A N/A 98.2% 3.9% <3 <3 <3 <3 97.2% 4.% 98.2% 4.4% 94.7% 22.2% 97.% 36.5% 96.7% 35.7% 97.4% 29.7% Science 97.% 26.5% 98.7% 2.4% N/A N/A 96.6% 3.8% 94.2% 27.4% 97.4% 24.3% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 5 of 27

/3/27 Accountability Details Graduation Data Student Group Statewide District School All 79.79% 82.63% N/A Indian or Alaska Native 7.88% N/A N/A Asian 9.77% N/A N/A Black or African 67.3% N/A N/A Hispanic of Any Race 72.7% N/A N/A Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 76.67% N/A N/A Two or More Races 74.74% N/A N/A White 83.48% 82.63% N/A Female 83.76% N/A N/A Male 76.% N/A N/A 67.48% 69.74% N/A English Language Learners 72.4% N/A N/A With Disabilities 57.2% 6.6% N/A Bottom 3% N/A N/A N/A * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 6 of 27

/3/27 Accountability Details Attendance Data Student Group Statewide District School All 94.32% 95.34% 95.46% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 7 of 27

/3/27 Accountability Status District Data District Name Status Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 8 of 27

/3/27 Accountability Status School Data School Name Status Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score Zemmer Campus 8/9 Green 2 Green 2 Green 2 Yellow 28 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 9 of 27

/3/27 Teacher Quality - Qualification Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School Other B.A. M.A. P.H.D. 2 34 Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Teacher Quality - Class School Aggregate High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools age of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers.% N/A N/A Teacher Quality - Provisional Certification age of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School with Emergency Certification.% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 27

/3/27 NAEP Grade 4 Math of below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced All 23 77 34 5 Male Female 5 49 22 23 78 77 36 32 6 4 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 47 53 # 36 64 9 7 49 9 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 72 5 6 4 # 3 5 53 38 85 47 62 89 39 2 58 5 &#35 3 9 &#8225 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 2 88 47 9 53 8 4 37 5 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 5 95 42 22 Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 25 Achievement. 58 78 6 35 5 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 27

/3/27 NAEP Grade 8 Math of below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced All 32 39 22 7 Male Female 5 49 3 34 39 39 23 2 7 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 45 55 # 48 9 39 4 2 3 2 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 69 2 4 3 # 2 23 66 38 43 29 44 8 26 5 5 39 7 # 4 32 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 89 77 27 9 4 3 24 # 7 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 3 97 54 32 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 25 Achievement. 33 39 22 2 7 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 22 of 27

/3/27 NAEP Grade 2 Math of below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced All 34 4 23 2 Male Female 5 49 32 35 4 42 26 22 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 35 64 54 22 37 44 9 32 2 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 76 4 5 3 26 68 58 26 42 27 33 32 3 5 9 35 2 7 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 9 9 78 3 9 43 3 25 2 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 2 98 33 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 25 Achievement. 4 24 2 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 23 of 27

/3/27 NAEP Grade 4 Reading of below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced All 37 63 29 5 Male Female 5 5 39 34 6 66 26 3 5 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 48 52 # 5 24 5 76 6 4 8 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 72 4 6 4 # 3 32 66 49 6 3 68 34 5 84 7 32 9 7 49 37 6 5 8 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 2 88 76 32 24 68 7 3 # 6 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 4 96 52 36 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 25 Reading Assessment. 48 64 6 29 2 5 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 24 of 27

/3/27 NAEP Grade 8 Reading of below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced All 24 44 29 3 Male Female 5 49 29 2 45 42 25 34 2 4 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 45 55 # 37 4 45 43 7 39 4 Race/Ethnicity White Black or Afican Hispanic Asian/Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Indian or Alaska Native Two or More Races 69 2 4 3 2 8 47 27 3 44 44 4 35 34 9 29 4 3 &#35 3 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 9 64 2 3 45 5 32 # 3 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 3 97 57 23 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 25 Reading Assessment. 37 44 6 3 # 3 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 25 of 27

/3/27 NAEP Grade 2 Reading of below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced All 26 5 27 5 Male Female 5 5 3 2 37 37 28 37 4 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 35 64 37 9 39 36 22 38 2 7 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 76 4 5 3 2 52 34 2 38 36 44 26 36 2 2 4 6 2 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 7 93 66 23 25 38 8 34 5 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 2 98 25 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 25 Reading Assessment. 37 33 5 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 26 of 27

/3/27 NAEP Participation Data Grade Subject Participation Rate for with Disabilities Standard Error Participation Rate for Limited English Proficient Standard Error 4 Math Reading 87 73.9 3.7 95 9 2. 2.5 8 Math Reading 84 76 3.6 3.3 84 83 5.2 4. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 27 of 27