ARIZONA COMMUNITY COLLEGES: 2012 OUTCOMES REPORT

Similar documents
Strategic Planning Guide

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Arizona County Community College Districts and Colleges of Qualifying Indian Tribes Year Ended June 30, 2013

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

Robert S. Unnasch, Ph.D.

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Network Technology/Cisco and Linux Networking Education Report. 5, % $27.63/hr

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

State Budget Update February 2016

Access Center Assessment Report

Raw Data Files Instructions

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

McNeese State University University of Louisiana System. GRAD Act Annual Report FY

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

The mission of the Grants Office is to secure external funding for college priorities via local, state, and federal funding sources.

Integrated Pell Grant Expansion and Bachelor s Completion Pay for Performance: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Harrison G. Holcomb William T.

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Validation Requirements and Error Codes for Submitting Common Completion Metrics

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

FY Matching Scholarship Grant Allocations by County Based on Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) Population 1

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Braiding Funds. Registered Apprenticeship

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

FTE General Instructions

EARNING. THE ACCT 2016 INVITATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: GETTING IN THE FAST LANE Ensuring Economic Security and Meeting the Workforce Needs of the Nation

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Educational Attainment

High School Equivalency Diploma Task Force Report & Recommendation

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Trends in College Pricing

Supplemental Focus Guide

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Argosy University, Los Angeles MASTERS IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP - 20 Months School Performance Fact Sheet - Calendar Years 2014 & 2015

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

An Analysis of the El Reno Area Labor Force

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

STEM SMART Workshop Las Vegas - Sept 19, 2012

Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development Volume V, Issue 3 - Fall 2011

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Is Open Access Community College a Bad Idea?

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

Career and Technical Education (CTE) Graduation Rates in Tennessee: A Comparative Study. A dissertation. presented to

ABILITY SORTING AND THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLEGE QUALITY TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM COMMUNITY COLLEGES

Digital Transformation in Education. Future-Ready Skills

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Marketing for Enrollment as Performance Based Funding Accelerates

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

South Dakota Board of Regents Intent to Plan for a Master of Engineering (M.Eng)

2/3 9.8% 38% $0.78. The Status of Women in Missouri: 2016 ARE WOMEN 51% 22% A Comprehensive Report of Leading Indicators and Findings.

ADULT BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cooper Upper Elementary School

BASIC EDUCATION IN GHANA IN THE POST-REFORM PERIOD

learning collegiate assessment]

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

Transcription:

ARIZONA COMMUNITY COLLEGES: 2012 OUTCOMES REPORT In 2011, Arizona s community colleges embarked upon a long-term Strategic Vision to significantly increase the number of Arizonans who achieve their postsecondary education and training goals, complete a degree or certificate, and/or transfer to a university. In order to measure progress toward the three major goals outlined in the Strategic Vision, the colleges have implemented a rigorous selfassessment and accountability process centered around the annual collection and distribution of data related to 30 key indicators. Statewide data pertaining to these 30 indicators can be found in the 2012 Strategic Vision Student Progress and Outcomes Report, and online at www.arizonacommunitycolleges.org/outcomes. The 2012 Summary Outcomes Report complements the 2012 Strategic Vision Student Progress and Outcomes Report, and for 5 core metrics illustrates how each of Arizona s 10 community college districts compares to the others. Statewide averages are noted in the text accompanying each metric, and an appendix provides comparison data for all 30 indicators. It is important to note that Arizona s community colleges differ significantly in terms of the populations served, education and training goals of learners, and institutional priorities (such as transfer or workforce preparation). Comparing student progress and outcomes across districts can be an extremely useful precursor to the sharing of best practices and successful program models across the state. However, each district must be assessed in light of its unique characteristics, goals, and priorities, and most importantly, by its ability to demonstrate incremental improvements in student access, retention, and completion over time. As 2012 was the first full year of Strategic Vision data collection, the outcomes presented in this document should be considered a baseline for comparison in future years, and will enable Arizona s community colleges to set reasonable benchmarks for attainment related to core metrics.

This figure, as well as those that appear on the following pages, illustrate student progress and outcomes data for Arizona Western College (AWC), Central Arizona College (CAC), Cochise College, Coconino Community College (CCC), Eastern Arizona College (EAC), the ten colleges and two skills centers in the Maricopa County Community College District (MCCCD), Mohave Community College, Northland Pioneer College (NPC), Pima Community College, and Yavapai College. Over two years, 63 percent of student credit hours attempted in developmental courses by the Statewide 2009 New Student Cohort were successfully completed (with a grade of A, B, C, or Pass). In that same time period, 74 percent of student credit hours attempted in college-level courses by the Statewide 2009 New Student Cohort were successfully completed (with a grade of A, B, C, or Pass). Although national course success rates are not yet available, these indicators are aligned with those included in the American Association for Community Colleges Voluntary Framework of Accountability initiative, which will allow for comparisons with national norms in years to come. 1

After six years, 28 percent of developmental math learners in the Statewide 2005 New Student Cohort successfully completed a college-level course in math, and 47 percent of all developmental English or reading learners in the same cohort completed a college-level English course. While comparisons with national norms will not be possible until the Voluntary Framework of Accountability begins publishing national data for these and other indicators, a study conducted by scholars at Columbia University s Community College Research Center¹ showed that 20 percent of community college students referred to developmental math and 37 percent of community college students referred to developmental English/reading completed a college-level course in the corresponding subject area within three years. These national success after remediation rates are somewhat lower than Arizona s rates, but are likely comparable, as the national study was limited to three years, and as a significant percentage of Arizona s developmental learners who complete college-level courses do so in years three through six. ¹Bailey, T., Jeong, D. W., & Cho, S. W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29, 255-270. 2

For this measure, a specific group of students called the Credential-Seeking Cohort was tracked; this group is defined as fulland part-time learners who earned at least 12 credit hours by the end of their second year. Tracking this sub-cohort aligns Arizona s data collection and accountability strategies with those of national community college initiatives such as the Voluntary Framework of Accountability (VFA). Furthermore, analysis of retention outcomes within this sub-cohort provides a more accurate gauge of community college student success, as it takes into account learners diverse education and training goals. Statewide, 77 percent of learners in the Statewide 2009 Credential-Seeking Cohort (excluding those who successfully transferred and/or earned a degree or certificate) persisted at their district to the following fall. The statewide rate as well as retention rates at 7 out of 10 of Arizona s community college districts are somewhat higher than a comparative national rate (52 percent),² as the national number is not limited to credential-seekers. However, because the VFA is beginning to track and analyze retention among credential-seeking sub-cohorts, more accurate national comparisons should be available in future years. 3 ²NCHEMS. (2009). Retention rates First-time college freshmen returning their second year. Boulder, CO: Author.

For this measure, a specific group of students called the Credential-Seeking Cohort was tracked; this group is defined as fulland part-time learners who earned at least 12 credit hours by the end of their second year. Tracking this sub-cohort aligns Arizona s data collection and accountability strategies with those of national community college initiatives such as the Voluntary Framework of Accountability (VFA). Furthermore, analysis of graduation rates within this sub-cohort provides a more accurate gauge of community college student success, as it takes into account learners diverse education and training goals. After six years, 30 percent of the Statewide 2005 Credential-Seeking Cohort had completed a community college degree or certificate. Graduation rates vary significantly among Arizona s 10 community college districts and correspond, in large part, to the percentage of learners at each district who transfer to a four-year university and/or gain employment prior to earning a degree or certificate. The statewide rate as well as graduation rates at 8 out of 10 of Arizona s community college districts are somewhat higher than a comparative national rate (25 percent),³ as the national number is not limited to credential-seekers. However, because the VFA is beginning to track and analyze completion among credential-seeking sub-cohorts, more accurate national comparisons should be available in future years. ³U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: Author. 4

Arizona s tribal, public community colleges, and universities have agreed upon a common structure for the Arizona General Education Curriculum (AGEC) in order to ensure the comparability and seamless transfer of general education credits across institutions. The AGEC is comprised of 35-37 credit hours of coursework that, upon completion, will transfer to all tribal or public community colleges, as well as the three state universities, and meet lower division, general education requirements. Although most community college students take courses included in the AGEC, some transfer prior to completing the full curriculum. While these early transfers are still viewed as successful completers, research shows that students who have completed a common general education core (such as the AGEC) and/or a degree prior to transfer are better prepared for upper-division work and earn bachelor s degrees in less time and with fewer excess credits both of which lead to cost savings for students and states.⁴ In order to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the transfer process in Arizona, the state s community colleges are making a concerted effort to raise the proportion (currently 52 percent statewide) of in-state transfers who have earned an AGEC and/or degree prior to transfer. 5 ⁴Kisker, C. B., Wagoner, R. L., & Cohen, A. M. (2010). Implementing statewide transfer and articulation reform: An analysis of transfer associate degrees in four states. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Community Colleges.

APPENDIX: ACCESS INDICATORS 2012 STRATEGIC VISION STUDENT PROGRESS AND OUTCOMES DATA (BY DISTRICT) ACCESS INDICATORS STATEWIDE NATIONAL AWC CAC Cochise CCC EAC MCCCD Mohave NPC Pima Yavapai 1. 2010-11 full-time student equivalent (FTSE) enrollment 145,470-5,828 5,129 9,788 2,399 4,476 84,544 3,975 2,219 22,907 4,205 2a. Enrollment of underserved populations (underserved minorities) 34% 42%⁵ 62% 42% 48% 36% 32% 33% 20% 38% 40% 6% 2b. Enrollment of underserved populations (age 24+) 42% 40%⁵ 37% 52% 49% 42% 53% 41% 52% 70% 34% 56% 2c. Enrollment of underserved populations (Pell recipients) 32% 42%⁵ 56% 34% 34% 24% 24% 31% 49% 32% 34% 28% 3. Percent of 2010-11 student credit hours earned via alternative delivery methods and/or at alternative times or places 59% - 12% 69% 89% 50% 31% 63% 62% 66% 49% 56% 4. Community college-going rate 46% 26%⁶ 50% 37% 32% 9% 24% 31% 36% 15% 45% 28% 5. Overall college-going rate 51%⁷ 68%⁶ - - - - - - - - - - 6. Success after developmental math rate 28% VFA 34% 29% 16% 37% 54% 27% 18% 17% 27% 37% 7. Success after developmental English/reading rate 47% VFA 45% 55% 34% 41% 74% 48% 32% 28% 46% 44% 8. Cost of attendance as a percentage of Arizona (or county) median household income 15% - 21% 15% 9% 19% 18% 15% 22% 19% 7% 11% ⁵U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Author. ⁶U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). College enrollment and work activity of 2010 high school graduates. Washington, DC: Author. ⁷Postsecondary Education Opportunity. (2011). Arizona College-Going Rate - 2008. Oskaloosa, IA: The Mortenson Seminar on Public Policy Analysis and Opportunity for Postsecondary Education. 6

APPENDIX: RETENTION INDICATORS 2012 STRATEGIC VISION STUDENT PROGRESS AND OUTCOMES DATA (BY DISTRICT, CONT.) RETENTION INDICATORS STATEWIDE NATIONAL AWC CAC Cochise CCC EAC MCCCD Mohave NPC Pima Yavapai 9. College-level course success rate 74% VFA 65% 75% 82% 91% 89% 73% 78% 80% 74% 78% 10. Developmental course success rate 63% VFA 59% 50% 71% 76% 69% 66% 58% 65% 61% 71% 11. Percent of first college-level math and English credit hours successfully completed 69% 68% - 79%⁸ 58% 51% 78% 82% 86% 69% 67% 81% 67% 71% 12a. Percent of full-time learners completing 42 credits by the end of the 2nd academic year 45% VFA 58% 41% 37% 42% 43% 45% 25% 38% 47% 43% 12b. Percent of part-time learners completing 24 credits by the end of the 2nd academic year 51% VFA 67% 53% 40% 52% 53% 51% 45% 40% 53% 53% 13. Fall-to-next-term retention rate 93% VFA 96% 88% 92% 92% 89% 93% 88% 80% 95% 95% 14. Fall-to-fall retention rate 77% 52%⁹ 83% 69% 69% 65% 45% 80% 38% 43% 83% 79% ⁸National Community College Benchmark Project. (2011). Report of national aggregate data. Overland Park, KS: Author. ⁹NCHEMS. (2009). Retention rates - First-time college freshmen returning their second year. Boulder, CO: Author. 7

APPENDIX: COMPLETION INDICATORS 2012 STRATEGIC VISION STUDENT PROGRESS AND OUTCOMES DATA (BY DISTRICT, CONT.) COMPLETION INDICATORS STATEWIDE NATIONAL AWC CAC Cochise CCC EAC MCCCD Mohave NPC Pima Yavapai 15. Percent of learners achieving their stated education or training goals This indicator is in development. It will be incorporated into the Strategic Vision once enough time has passed to link intention to completion data. 16. Number of degrees and certificates awarded in 2010-11 34,944-1,255 974 2,686 282 981 21,396 972 424 5,157 817 17. Graduation (degree/certificate completion) rate 30% 25%¹⁰ 30% 33% 26% 10% 40% 30% 34% 18% 31% 29% 18. Percent of learners who complete an AGEC within 6 years 16% - 20% 6% 10% 10% 17% 15% 6% 4% 23% 23% 19. Number of in-state university transfers in 2010-11 9,777-354 216 225 220 153 6,793 148 98 1,775 262 20. Percent of 2010-11 transfers with an AGEC and/or degree at time of transfer 52% - 66% 75% 62% 46% 61% 51% 45% 53% 53% 57% 21. In-state university transfer rate (2004-05 cohort) 28% - 25% 35% 16% 29% 20% 29% 13% 13% 28% 25% 22. Overall transfer rate (2005-06 cohort) 28% 25%¹¹ 24% 26% 24% 35% 27% 28% N/A 16% 29% 33% ¹⁰U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Author. ¹¹Center for the Study of Community Colleges. (2002). National transfer rates are up! Results of the 2001 Transfer Assembly Project. Los Angeles: Author. 8

APPENDIX: COMPLETION INDICATORS 2012 STRATEGIC VISION STUDENT PROGRESS AND OUTCOMES DATA (BY DISTRICT, CONT.) COMPLETION INDICATORS (CONT.) STATEWIDE NATIONAL AWC CAC Cochise CCC EAC MCCCD Mohave NPC Pima Yavapai 23. Percent of learners achieving a successful community college outcome 77% VFA 96% 74% 64% 73% 72% 77% 74% 66% 84% 74% 24. Percent of 2007-08 transfers to Arizona public universities who earn a bachelor's degree in 4 years 70% - 67% 64% 71% 63% 56% 72% 61% 61% 70% 65% 25. Percent of all 2007-08 transfers who earn a bachelor's degree in 4 years 36% 53%¹² 28% 47% 27% 44% 57% 35% N/A 47% 66% 47% 26. Percent of occupational program completers passing a licensure exam within 1 year 27. Percent of occupational program completers either employed with a livable wage or enrolled in further education This indicator will be incorporated into the Strategic Vision once the VFA has finalized its corresponding metric, and as soon as all community college districts are able to obtain accurate licensure data. This indicator will be incorporated into the Strategic Vision once the VFA has finalized its corresponding metric, and when adjustments have been made to account for a lower median household income in Arizona. 28. Percent of ABE/GED learners who enter employment 53% 61%¹³ 74% 72% 94% 54% N/A 44% 38% 68% 51% 58% 29. Percent of ABE/GED completers enrolled in postsecondary education or training 82% 44%¹³ 91% 87% 99% 50% N/A 73% 88% 81% 87% 66% 30a. Percent of adults in Arizona (or county)with some college and/or an associate degree 30b. Percent of adults in Arizona (or county) with a bachelor's degree 34% 28%¹⁴ 31% - 34% 37% 38% 32% 35% - 42% 33% 36% 30% - 36% 34% 39% 26% 28%¹⁴ 9% - 13% 18% 21% 31% 13% - 15% 29% 12% 10% - 14% 30% 24% ¹²Melguizo, T., & Dowd, A. C. (2009). Baccalaureate success of transfers and rising 4-year college juniors. Teachers College Record, 111 (1), 55-89. ¹³U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education. (2011). Adult Education and Family Literacy Act of 1998: Annual report to Congress 2006-07. Washington, DC: Author. ¹⁴U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2010). Educational attainment: 2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Washington, DC: Author. 9