Teays Valley Local Schools

Teays Valley Local Schools ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY PLANNING BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING: DECEMBER 19, 2016

Current Boundaries Current School Capacity Enrollment Utilization Intradistrict Transfer In Intradistrict Transfer Out Static SPED Students Proposed Static Out of District Students Enrollment Empty Seats Utilization Delta Elementary Schools AES 550 406 74% 37 28 25 11 406 144 74% 0 SBES 550 407 74% 35 29 0 12 407 143 74% 0 SES 750 719 96% 8 17 0 11 719 31 96% 0 WES 550 412 75% 17 31 7 21 412 138 75% 0 Middle Schools EMS 590 477 81% 9 6 0 21 477 113 81% 0 WMS 590 409 69% 6 9 0 14 409 181 69% 0 2

Comprehensive Process Develop Measurable Criteria Assemble Steering Committee Develop Options Collect Community Feedback Analyze Results Develop Recommendations 3

Project Timeline August 15 th Board Presentation, Began Collecting Steering Committee Applications September 2 nd Steering Committee application window closed September 7 th Steering Committee membership guidelines finalized September 12 th Steering Committee Meeting #1 October 3 rd Steering Committee Meeting #2 October 17 th Steering Committee Meeting #3 November 7 th Steering Committee Meeting #4 November 14 th & 15 th Community Meetings December 5 th Steering Committee Meeting #5 December 19 th, 2017 Final Board Presentation 4

Develop Measurable Guidelines These are parameters that will be used to determine the effectiveness of potential boundary options. Examples include: Balance utilization among all schools while allowing for future growth or other demographic changes. Minimize student transportation and travel time. Utilize geographical boundaries (major roads, subdivisions, rivers, etc.). Attempt to assign entire neighborhoods to the same schools. Maintain diverse student populations (Socio-economics, race / ethnicity). Consideration of vertical alignment (Pathways from elementary to middle school to high school). 5

Develop Measurable Guidelines There is no prioritization of guidelines. Some may be in direct contradiction of others. The intent is to provide a measurable way to compare options to each other. 6

Assemble Steering Committee A steering committee, composed of parents and other community members, is critical to a successful process. Steering Committee Member Roles and Responsibilities: Be objective and consider the needs of ALL TVLSD students. Attend all steering committee meetings Share information with your neighbors and help get the word out about the process. What is not going to happen? A small segment of the community will stack the committee to push an agenda. 7

Assemble Steering Committee Steering Committee Composition 30-40 parents and community members Geographically diverse Teachers and administrators may participate, but must adhere to roles and responsibilities. Steering Committee Selection Applications were submitted online Applicants from over-represented areas self selected to come to the appropriate number of members. 8

Steering Committee Composition Composition of the Committee should mirror the student enrollment 101 responses collected between August 16 th and September 6 th Geographical Distribution of Students (Based on Elementary Attendance Zone) Geographical Distribution of Applicants (Based on Elementary Attendance Zone) Walnut 22% Ashville 20% S. Bloomfield 13% Walnut 12% Ashville 13% S. Bloomfield 21% Scioto 37% Scioto 62% 9

Steering Committee Composition K-8 Grade Level Distribution Students Middle School 32% El ementary 68% Elementary Middle School 10

Steering Committee Composition (48 / 101 attended the first meeting) We want to have a manageable number under 40 Representation should mirror the district. At-large seats are intended for high school parents or those who do not have children in the system. Parents with students in more than one grade level may fill either slot. Consider balanced representations between neighborhoods with each Geographical Area geographical area. Elementary Parents East MS Parents West MS Parents At Large Members Total Percentage Ashville 5 2 1 8 21.6% Scioto 9 3 1 13 35.1% S. Bloomfield 5 1 1 1 8 21.6% Walnut 5 2 1 8 21.6% Total 24 5 4 4 37 11

Steering Committee Composition Steering Committee Members: Monique Brown Ronde Brushart Craig Butler Dawn Carothers Neil Cline Kendra Cook Erin Crego Anna Davis Jennifer Dennis Jennifer Driesbach Chris Fleming Nathan Frick Kelly Frizzell Julie Gill Chad Henderson Mark Hoffhines Traci Huston Stacie Jett Kristen Kachurak Jennifer Kirk Amanda Marshall John Maynard Megan McCarley Chistopher McComb Carey McFarland Kim Miller Bruce Moore Megan Reichert John Roberts Kelly Sells Kendra Sherman Aubrey Sturgell Jessica Templin Joseph Testa David Thompson Ryan Thompson Allison Wilcox 12

Background Information Current Enrollment by School by Grade Ashville Elementary S. Bloomfield Elementary Scioto Elementary Walnut Elementary Grade Students Grade Students Grade Students Grade Students PS 23 PS 17 PS 33 PS 13 KG 45 KG 60 KG 93 KG 59 1 72 1 66 1 119 1 63 2 81 2 71 2 126 2 63 3 52 3 70 3 101 3 75 4 71 4 57 4 136 4 67 5 62 5 66 5 111 5 72 TOTAL 406 TOTAL 407 TOTAL 719 TOTAL 412 T.V. East Middle School Grade Students 6 148 7 165 8 164 TOTAL 477 T.V. West Middle School 1 Source: Teays Valley Local Schools, September 1, 2016 Grade Students 6 143 7 143 8 123 TOTAL 409 Teays Valley High School Grade Students 9 298 10 335 11 303 12 310 23 2 TOTAL 1248 School Grade PS KG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 23 TOTAL Ashville ES 23 45 72 81 52 71 62 - - - - - - - - 406 Scioto ES 33 93 119 126 101 136 111 - - - - - - - - 719 S. Bloomfield ES 17 60 66 71 70 57 66 - - - - - - - - 407 Walnut ES 13 59 63 63 75 67 72 - - - - - - - - 412 East MS - - - - - - - 148 165 164 - - - - - 477 West MS - - - - - - - 143 143 123 - - - - - 409 TVHS - - - - - - - - - - 298 335 303 310 2 1248 TOTAL 86 257 320 341 298 331 311 291 308 287 298 335 303 310 2 4078 Teays Valley School District Grade Students PS 86 KG 257 1 320 2 341 3 298 4 331 5 311 6 291 7 308 8 287 9 298 10 335 11 303 12 310 23 2 TOTAL 4078 13

Background Information Live/Attend Tables Teays V alley Local Schools 2016-2017 Elementary School (PK-5) Live/Attend Live Attend Ashville Scioto South Bloomfield Source: Teays Valley Local Schools, September 1, 2016 Walnut Live In Transfer Out % Transfer Out Ashville 340 0 15 13 368 28 8% Scioto 12 700 11-723 23 3% South Bloomfield 23 6 360 4 393 33 8% Walnut 20 2 9 374 405 31 8% Out of District 11 11 12 21 - - - Attend 406 719 407 412 Live and Attend 340 700 360 374 Transfer In 66 19 47 38 % Transfer In 16% 3% 12% 9% Teays V alley Local Schools 2016-2017 Middle School (6-8) Live/Attend Live Attend East MS West MS Live In Source: Teays Valley Local Schools, September 1, 2016 Transfer Out % Transfer O East MS 447 6 453 6 1% West MS 9 389 398 9 2% Out of District 21 14 - - - Attend 477 409 Live and Attend 447 389 Transfer In 30 20 % Transfer In 6% 5% 14

Background Information Projected Enrollment & Utilization 2016-2017 School Year 2021-2022 School Year 2025-2026 School Year Building Capacity Current Enrollment Utilization Projected Enrollment Enrollment Comparison to Current S.Y. Projected Utilization Projected Enrollment Enrollment Comparison to Current S.Y. Projected Utilization TVHS 1800 1248 69% 1264 +16 70% 1396 +148 78% East MS 590 477 81% 585 +108 99% 564 +87 96% West MS 590 409 69% 514 +105 87% 514 +105 87% Ashville Elementary 550 406 74% 416 +10 76% 478 +72 87% Scioto Elementary 750 719 96% 753 +34 100% 858 +139 114% S. Bloomfield Elementary 550 407 74% 434 +27 79% 496 +89 90% Walnut Elementary 550 412 75% 407-5 74% 458 +46 83% Total 5380 4078 76% 4373 +255 81% 4764 +686 89% < 70% 70% - 79% 80% - 89% 90% - 100% > 100% 15

Background Information Planning Units School Info Current Enrollment Key ES MS PK-5 6-8 Total SES-00 Scioto West 44 32 76 SES-01 Scioto West 107 38 145 SES-02 Scioto West 4 5 9 SES-03 Scioto West 30 14 44 SES-04 Scioto West 125 43 168 SES-05 Scioto West 19 12 31 SES-06 Scioto West 2 0 2 SES-07 Scioto West 27 14 41 SES-08 Scioto West 10 3 13 SES-09 Scioto West 14 5 19 SES-10 Scioto West 6 3 9 SES-11 Scioto West 145 66 211 SES-12 Scioto West 78 34 112 SES-13 Scioto West 6 4 10 SES-14 Scioto West 40 17 57 WES-00 Walnut East 84 41 125 WES-01 Walnut East 14 8 22 WES-02 Walnut East 6 0 6 WES-03 Walnut East 17 17 34 WES-04 Walnut East 55 26 81 WES-05 Walnut East 45 22 67 WES-06 Walnut East 5 3 8 WES-07 Walnut East 15 13 28 WES-08 Walnut East 9 4 13 WES-09 Walnut East 14 17 31 WES-10 Walnut East 22 6 28 WES-11 Walnut East 42 10 52 WES-12 Walnut East 25 9 34 4 School Info Current Enrollment Key ES MS PK-5 6-8 Total AES-00 Ashville East 78 39 117 AES-01 Ashville East 82 21 103 AES-02 Ashville East 108 53 161 AES-03 Ashville East 59 22 81 SBES-00 S. Bloomfield East 84 31 115 SBES-01 S. Bloomfield East 2 0 2 SBES-02 S. Bloomfield East 43 16 59 SBES-03 S. Bloomfield East 39 22 61 SBES-04 S. Bloomfield East 9 4 13 SBES-05 S. Bloomfield West 12 7 19 SBES-06 S. Bloomfield West 15 8 23 SBES-07 S. Bloomfield East 2 0 2 SBES-08 S. Bloomfield East 5 5 10 SBES-09 S. Bloomfield West 22 14 36 SBES-10 S. Bloomfield West 15 7 22 SBES-11 S. Bloomfield East 9 10 19 SBES-12 S. Bloomfield East 14 8 22 SBES-13 S. Bloomfield West 24 9 33 SBES-14 S. Bloomfield West 50 19 69 Planning Units The purpose of these planning units are to assist in the boundary planning process. These, along with the other data in this packet, can be used to create preliminary ideas for the steering committee to consider. 16

Background Information Current Boundaries Elementary School Boundaries Middle School Boundaries Planning Units With Current Elementary School Boundaries Planning Units with Current Middle School Boundaries 5 6 17

Background Information Student Density Map Student Density: PK-8 The map above represents students per square mile. 7 18

Background Information Closest School Analysis 8 Closest School Analysis The map above shows how the boundaries would look if all elementary students attended the school that was geographically closest to them, as compared to the current boundaries. The corresponding table illustrates the enrollment at each school with utilization if this were the case. School Enrollment Capacity Utilization Ashville ES 582 550 106% Scioto ES 798 750 106% South Bloomfield ES 259 550 47% Walnut ES 305 550 55% 19

Background Information Development 1 7 2 6 3 5 4 Development Within the District Map Number Subdivision Elementary Boundary Additional # of Units Planning Unit Notes 1 Chestnut Commons Scioto 147 SES-03 Westport Homes, found in previous study, confirmed by Westport Homes 2 Walker Pointe Scioto 42 SES-01 Maronda Homes, found in previous study 3 Ashton Crossing Ashville 250 AES-01 62 acres, development has already begun- won't be ready for 1-2 years 4 Cromley Road/ Lockbourne-Eastern Rd Area Walnut - WES-06 Grant funding was received to expand sanitary sewer service to this area, suspected subdivision in near future once this is completed, some of the area is owned by Sturdy Builders 5 Bloomfield Hills S. Bloomfield - SBES-00 Pulte Homes, no plans to expand 6 Scioto Landing/River Bend S. Bloomfield - SBES-00 Owned by Moronda Homes, no plans to expand 7 Southern Point- area south of subdivision Scioto - SES-07 Pulte Homes 9 20

Background Information Student Yield by Subdivision Subdivision Units PK-8 Students Yield ASHBROOK ESTATES 39 5 0.13 ASHTON CROSSING 49 34 0.69 ASHTON VILLAGE 276 126 0.46 ASHTON WOODS 103 28 0.27 BISHOP 155 3 0.02 BLOOMFIELD HILLS 193 40 0.21 BOOR ADDITION 70 5 0.07 CANAL VIEW ESTATES 65 22 0.34 CHESTNUT ESTATES 126 58 0.46 CRITES-COOK 81 19 0.23 CROMLEY ADDITION 280 79 0.28 DOLBY ADDITION 48 6 0.13 EAST LAWN 82 7 0.09 FOXFIRE ESTATES 37 13 0.35 GENOA CROSSING 106 19 0.18 POWELL 119 28 0.24 RIVER BEND 85 25 0.29 SCIOTO LANDING 27 18 0.67 SOUTHERN POINT (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) 402 251 0.62 SUNNYSIDE ACRES 37 21 0.57 THE ESTATE LOTS AT SOUTHERN POINT 8 4 0.50 THE VILLAGE AT SOUTHERN POINT (CONDOMINIUMS) 355 108 0.30 WALKER POINTE 188 127 0.68 WALNUT HEIGHTS 47 10 0.21 WEST SCIOTO GREEN 73 35 0.48 WILLOW BROOK 40 3 0.08 TOTAL 3091 1094 0.35 21

Develop Preliminary Options Steering committee members utilized GIS and other background information to develop preliminary options. The committee developed strengths and challenges for each option as they compared to the guidelines. The committee created14 preliminary options. 22

Preliminary Options 23

Develop Options Steering committee members vetted through all preliminary options and decided upon the options to present to the community for feedback. 24

Community Meeting Options were presented to the community at large for feedback (not a vote). Process and options were presented. Community members completed an individual questionnaire to share initial reactions to the options. Community members then discussed options with other community members in a consensus building exercise. All feedback was collected and compiled into a results report. 25

Community Meeting Turnout Monday 11/14 115 signed the registration form. 92 individual surveys, 18 group surveys Tuesday 11/15 110 signed the registration forms 96 individual surveys, 15 group surveys Online responses collected from 11/14 11/29 339 responses 26

Analyze Results The steering committee reviewed feedback from the community and considered it along with the guidelines as they developed a recommendation. Results included: Level of support for each option Written comments related to each option Aggregated background information of respondents (school, neighborhood, etc.) An excel workbook containing raw results which was filterable was also provided. 27

Analyze Results Option 1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual 25 19 13 8 26 Group Individual Group 4 46 8 2 6 24 4 7 5 6 3 11 $ 0 1 2 4 6 Miles Online 125 32 22 32 121 28

Analyze Results Option 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual 11 17 14 15 33 Group Individual Group 1 9 3 3 26 3 3 2 19 6 26 7 1 14 2 1 $ 0 1 2 4 6 Miles Online 38 46 44 65 137 29

Analyze Results Option 3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual 3 12 13 27 35 Group Individual Group 3 1 1 6 19 7 6 38 8 8 27 2 $ 0 1 2 4 6 Miles Online 7 28 45 104 144 30

Analyze Results Option 4a 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% F rom SBES To WES Individual 11 19 22 19 19 Group Individual Group 4 2 3 9 1 22 7 6 31 2 5 4 26 1 1 $ 0 1 2 4 6 Miles Online 36 40 51 78 123 31

Analyze Results Option 4b 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual 17 16 15 23 19 Group Individual Group 7 1 8 5 3 18 4 5 33 3 5 28 4 2 $ 0 1 2 4 6 Miles Online 26 39 57 79 128 32

Analyze Results PK-2 Option 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 3-5 3-5 PK-2 Individual 14 8 10 12 45 Group 3 4 4 6 1 Individual Group 12 2 11 10 6 14 3 48 3 0 1 2 4 6 Miles $ Online 51 27 28 44 176 33

Analyze Results Option 6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual 30 14 15 7 26 Group Individual Group 1 14 1 5 12 2 3 14 4 3 19 2 4 3 35 2 2 $ 0 1 2 4 6 Miles Online 128 37 23 30 113 34

Analyze Results Preferred Option 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4a Option 4b Option 5 Option 6 Other or Combination No Consensus Monday Individual Monday Group Tuesday Individual Tuesday Group Online 35

Analyze Results Options Comparison: Individual Paper & Online Questionnaires 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Option 1 196 75 42 46 158 Option 2 58 89 77 106 184 Option 3 13 46 77 169 206 Option 4a 51 68 95 128 168 Option 4b 50 63 90 135 175 Option 5 77 46 48 70 269 Option 6 172 63 52 56 174 Very Supportive Supportive Neutral Unsupportive Very Unsupportive 36

Develop Recommendation After reviewing the feedback from the community meetings, the steering committee developed a recommendation for the Superintendent. The committee voted on their preferred option based on the community feedback. 22 committee members voted for Option 1 5 committee members voted for Option 5 2 committee members voted for Option 6 37

Recommendation: Option 1 38

Recommendation Most supported and least unsupported by community Moves 562 students Creates 100% feeders into middle school No subdivision splits Balances middle school utilization Allows for growth at Scioto 39

Project Website http://www.dejongrichter.com/tvlsd/ All content related to the process was posted on this page. There was an FAQ page for community members to ask questions about the process. There was a link on the district website. 40