Program Review Department Data Packet

Similar documents
Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Educational Attainment

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Transportation Equity Analysis

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

12-month Enrollment

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Shelters Elementary School

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Kahului Elementary School

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Data Diskette & CD ROM

THIS KIT CONTAINS ALL THE INFORMATION YOU NEED

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Hokulani Elementary School

Best Colleges Main Survey

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Access Center Assessment Report

Communities in Schools of Virginia

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Validation Requirements and Error Codes for Submitting Common Completion Metrics

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

A Diverse Student Body

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Aalya School. Parent Survey Results

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Abu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada

Raw Data Files Instructions

LIM College New York, NY

Freshman Admission Application 2016

Review of Student Assessment Data

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

University of Arizona

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE


NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Cooper Upper Elementary School

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Student-Athlete. Code of Conduct

History. 344 History. Program Student Learning Outcomes. Faculty and Offices. Degrees Awarded. A.A. Degree: History. College Requirements

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Adapt and Overcome: Helping Student Veterans Transition to Academic Life

Emergency Medical Technician Course Application

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Transcription:

Enrollment Patterns & Course Offerings Unique Headcount 105 100 109 113 111 Total Course Enrollments 231 190 212 300 404 # of Course Offerings 12 12 12 12 12 # of Section Offerings 12 12 12 12 14 Ave Enrollment per Section* 19.3 15.8 17.7 25.0 28.9 *Color Coding: Pink cells contain values at least 10% lower than the college average; blue cells at least 10% above the college average. Data Definitions: Unique Headcount is the count of individual students (no duplicates) enrolled in any courses within the Department Total Course Enrollments is the sum of all individual section enrollments within the Department. # of Course Offerings is the number of courses offered within the department for that. # of Section Offerings is the number of course sections offered within the department for that. Ave Enrollment per Section is the average number of students per section (Average Class Size). 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Total Course Enrollments # of Section Offerings Ave Enrollment per Section* 404 25.0 28.9 19.3 17.7 300 15.8 231 212 190 14 12 12 12 12 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 * Compare course enrollments to section offerings. What is the relationship between the two trends? * Consider the trend in average enrollments per section. How does that trend compare to the trend in section offerings? * How does your Department's average enrollment per section compare to the college average? Why might they be different? * Consider the levels & growth of course enrollments and unique headcount. What does the difference tell you about your students? * Do the trends suggest any goals or enrollment targets for the department? Page 1 of 8

Department Efficiency WSCH 549 511 516 613 975 FTES 18.3 17.0 17.2 20.4 32.5 FTE 1.8 1.79 1.73 1.73 1.9 Load* 305 285 299 355 513 *Color Coding: Cells shaded pink contain values 10% lower than the College average; cells shaded blue contain values 10% above the College average. Data Definitions: WSCH is the total Weekly Student Contact Hours resulting from all enrollment within the department. FTES is the total Full Time Equivalent Student value resulting from all enrollment within the department. FTE is the Full Time Equivalent faculty associated with the Department's course offerings for that. Load is the ratio of WSCH to FTE and a standard measure of department efficiency. Department Overview Load* FTES 550 32.5 35.0 500 513 30.0 450 400 18.3 17.0 17.2 20.4 25.0 20.0 350 355 15.0 300 250 305 285 299 10.0 5.0 200 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 0.0 * What are the overall trends for Dept FTES & Load? Are the trends moving in the same direction? * Were there any deviations or sudden changes in the trend over the period? What do you think might be the underlying causes? * How does your Dept load compare with the college average? Are the trends similar? Why might they be different? * Given these trends and your reflection on their causes, what do you think are reasonable one year and three year targets for FTES & Load? Page 2 of 8

Student Performance Profile Success Rate* 94.8% 93.7% 96.7% 91.3% 98.8% Retention Rate* 97.8% 95.3% 98.6% 99.3% 98.8% Ave Units Attempted this Academic Yea 1.3 1.27 1.59 1.67 2.01 Ave Units Earned this 1.27 1.16 1.49 1.49 1.71 Ave GPA 2.99 2.72 2.89 2.97 3.41 Ave Cumulative GPA 3.62 3.61 3.43 3.49 3.58 *Color Coding: Cells shaded pink contain values 10% lower than the College average; cells shaded blue contain values 10% above the College average. Data Definitions: Success Rate is the percentage of students receiving a passing grade (A, B, C or CR) relative to all students receiving a grade. Retention Rate is the percentage of students receiving any grade other than W relative to all students receiving a grade. Ave Units Attempted this is the average number of units associated with students enrollment for the after the add/drop deadlin Ave Units Earned this is the average number of course units awarded to the student at the end of the given. Ave GPA is the average current GPA of all students taking courses in the department for the given. Ave Cumulative GPA is the average cumulative GPA of all students taking courses in the department for the given. Student Performance Profile 110.0% 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% Success Rate* 97.8% 95.3% 94.8% 93.7% Retention Rate* 98.6% 99.3% 98.8% 96.7% 98.8% 91.3% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 * What are the overall trends in success rate and retention rate? Why might they be exhibiting those patterns? * Consider the levels & trends in student GPA and Unit Load? Could they explain any of the patterns in success and retention? * What do you think are the two or three underlying causes driving those trends and how might they be improved? * Are you generally satisfied with the departments current success & retention rates? How do they compare with the college average? Page 3 of 8

Student Enrollment Status Profile First Time Student 2 5 5 10 4 Continuing Student 96 87 96 96 99 Returning Student 7 8 8 7 8 Concurrent Enrollment 0 0 0 0 0 Percent First Time 2% 5% 5% 9% 4% Percent Continuing 91% 87% 88% 85% 89% Percent Returning 7% 8% 7% 6% 7% Percent Concurrent 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Data Definitions: First Time Student A student that has never attended this DISTRICT, but may have attended or may be currently attending another college. Returning Student is returning to this DISTRICT and has not attended another institution since the last here or is returning to this DISTRICT after attending another college. Continuing Students are those that attended the DISTRICT in immediately previous primary. Fall & Spring are primary s. Concurrent Enrollment is a student that is attending high school during the for which he/she is applying. 2005/06 2009/10 First Time Student Continuing Student First Time Student Continuing Student Returning Student Concurrent Enrollment Returning Student Concurrent Enrollment 7% 0% 2% 7% 0% 4% 91% 89% * How has the proportion first time, continuing & returning students in your department changed over the period? * How does the current picture compare with the college average and what does that tell you? Page 4 of 8

Student Goal Orientation Transfer (w/ or w/o Degree) 3 4 6 4 4 Degree or Certificate 1 0 0 0 2 Career Development 2 1 0 1 5 Educational Development 84 79 81 86 81 Undecided 0 0 2 3 2 Other Goal 15 16 17 18 13 Percent Transfer 3% 4% 6% 4% 4% Percent Degree or Certificate 1% 0% 0% 0% 2% Percent Career Development 2% 1% 0% 1% 5% Percent Education Development 80% 79% 74% 76% 73% Percent Undecided 0% 0% 2% 3% 2% Percent Other 14% 16% 16% 16% 12% Data Definitions: All counts & percentages reflect the student's primary educational goal as indicated on their first application. Note 1: Percentages do not sum to 100% because the Transfer category is not mutually exclusive with Degree Orientation. Note 2: Because of limited space only the first four categories are plotted below. Consider the patterns associated with the Undecided and Other categories when identifying and analyzing department trends. Sample of Student Goal Orientation 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Transfer (w/ or w/o Degree) Career Development Degreeor Certificate Educational Development 0% 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 * What are the most important trends occurring over the period? Do the data match your perceptions? * What do you think are the underlying causes driving these trends? * How do the department trends compare to the college? Why might the two show different trends? Page 5 of 8

Student Demographics Ethnicity African American 0 1 5 1 3 Asian or Pacific Islander 11 9 9 10 8 Caucasian 85 84 83 89 86 Hispanic 6 4 10 10 9 Native American 0 0 0 0 0 Other Ethnicity 3 2 2 3 5 Percent African American 0% 1% 5% 1% 3% Percent Asian or Pacific Islander 10% 9% 8% 9% 7% Percent Caucasian 81% 84% 76% 79% 77% Percent Hispanic 6% 4% 9% 9% 8% Percent Native American 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Percent Other Ethnicity 3% 2% 2% 3% 5% Data Definitions: Ethnicity category percentages may not sum to 100% due to nondisclosures. 2005/06 2009/10 African American Asian or Pacific Islander African American American Asian or Pacific Islander Caucasian Hispanic Caucasian Hispanic Native American Other Ethnicity Native American Other Ethnicity 6% 0%3% 0% 10% 8% 0% 5% 3% 7% 81% 77% * How has ethnicity profile of your department changed over the period? How do you interpret those changes? * What might be the underlying causes driving any changes? * How does the current picture compare with the college average and what does that tell you? Page 6 of 8

Student Demographics Gender & Age Female 61 59 69 71 69 Male 43 40 39 41 41 Less than 20 Yrs Old 0 0 0 0 0 Between 20 & 29 Yrs old 0 0 1 2 2 Between 30 & 49 Yrs Old 9 4 6 6 4 50 Years old & older 96 96 101 105 105 % Female 58% 59% 63% 63% 62% % Male 41% 40% 36% 36% 37% % Less than 20 yrs old 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% % Between 20 & 29 yrs old 0% 0% 1% 2% 2% % Between 30 and 49 yrs old 9% 4% 6% 5% 4% % 50 Years old & older 91% 96% 93% 93% 95% Data Definitions: Gender & Age category percentages may not sum to 100% due to nondisclosures. 2005/06 2009/10 Less than 20 Yrs Old Between 20 & 29 Yrs old Less than 20 Yrs Old Between 20 & 29 Yrs old Between 30 & 49 Yrs Old 50 Years old & older Between 30 & 49 Yrs Old 50 Years old & older 0% 9% 0% 2% 4% 91% 94% * Have there been any significant changes in the age profile of your students over the period? How do you interpret those changes? * What might be the underlying causes driving any changes? Do you expect the trend to continue? * How does the current picture for the department compare with the college? Page 7 of 8

Student Education Attainment Level Concurrent 0 0 0 0 0 No High School Degree 4 6 6 11 8 High School Degree or Equiv 55 45 57 54 52 Foreign Secondary Degree 2 3 4 3 3 Post Secondary Degree 42 44 40 43 46 % Concurrent Enrollment 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% % No High School Degree 4% 6% 6% 10% 7% % High School Degree or Equiv 52% 45% 52% 48% 47% % Foreign Secondary Degree 2% 3% 4% 3% 3% % Post Secondary Degree 40% 44% 37% 38% 41% Data Definitions: All counts & percentages reflect the student's primary educational goal as indicated on their first application. Note 1: Percentages do not sum to 100% because the Transfer category is not mutually exclusive with Degree Orientation. 2005/06 2009/10 Concurrent No High School Degree Concurrent No High School Degree HighSchool Degreeor Equiv Foreign SecondaryDegree HighSchool Degreeor Equiv Foreign SecondaryDegree Post Secondary Degree Post Secondary Degree 0%4% 0% 7% 41% 42% 53% 48% 2% 3% * Is the current education attainment profile of your students what you expected? * How has the education level of the students in your department been changing over this period? * What might be the underlying causes driving any changes? Do you expect the trend to continue? * How does the current picture for the department compare with the college? Page 8 of 8