2014-2015 Report Card for South Point Local School District DISTRICT GRADE Coming in 2018 Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? Performance Index 76.5%...... Indicators Met 81.3%...... 2015 Modified Achievement Measure C B COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Progress This is your district s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? Value-Added Overall... Gifted... Students with Disabilities... Lowest 20% in Achievement... A A C B COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Graduation Rate This grade answers the question How many ninth graders graduate in four years or five years? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Annual Measurable Objectives 84.7%...... 2015 AMO Download File B Graduation Rates 89.5% of students graduated in 4 years... 91.7% of students graduated in 5 years... B B K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from your district ready for college or a career? There are many ways to show that graduates are prepared. COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 K-3 Literacy Improvement 92.0%... A... Page 1 of 27
Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 GRADE C Performance Index The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts for improving performance. 120 Performance Index Trend Performance Index 20 0 40 60 80 100 76.5% 91.8 of a possible 120.0 A = 90.0-10 B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D = 50.0-69.9% F = 0.0-49.9% Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested 7.9 18.8 Pct of Students 0.0 9.7 30.3 x x x 1.3 1.2 1.1 = = = 33.2 x 1.0 = 18.8 x 0.6 = 7.9 x 0.3 = 0.1 x 0.0 = 0.1 9.7 33.2 Points for this Level 30.3 Points Received 0.0 11.6 33.3 33.2 11.3 2.4 0.0 91.8 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested 100 80 60 40 20 0 96.2 94.4 95.8 93.6 91.8 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Untested Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced Page 2 of 27
GRADE B Indicators Met Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. At least 80 percent of students must pass to get credit for the indicator. Indicators Met % 81.3% 26 out of 32 40 60 A = B = C = D = F = 90.0-10 80.0-89.9% 70.0-79.9% 50.0-69.9% 0.0-49.9% 20 0 80 100 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Ohio Graduation Test Mathematics 66.9% Mathematics 59.7% Mathematics 89.1% 3rd Grade 84.5% 6th Grade 70.5% 91.1% Mathematics 64.4% Social Studies 46.0% OGT, 10th Graders Science 82.2% 4th Grade 84.3% Mathematics 67.3% Social Studies 85.1% 7th Grade Social Studies 82.5% 78.2% Writing 93.0% Mathematics 68.2% Mathematics 66.7% Mathematics 86.3% 5th Grade 85.0% 8th Grade 81.7% 89.2% Science 67.6% Science 71.8% OGT, 11th Graders Science 83.3% Social Studies 87.3% Writing 88.2% Page 3 of 27
Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade 3rd Grade 3rd Grade 88% 84% 76% 72% 68% 64% 84.5% 80.5% 78.5% 66.9% 64.8% 66.3% Mathematics 100% 95% 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 District Similar Districts State Average Mathematics 4th Grade 4th Grade 88% 84.3% 84% 76% 72% 68% 64% 60% 71.9% 69.8% 64.4% 65.1% 63.3% 82.5% 72.6% 72.0% Mathematics Social Studies District Similar Districts State Average 100% 95% 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 60% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mathematics Social Studies 5th Grade 5th Grade 88% 85.0% 84% 76% 72% 68% 64% 60% 70.6% 69.5% 68.2% 67.6% 64.9% 65.7% 60.8% 60.3% Mathematics Science District Similar Districts State Average 100% 95% 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mathematics Science Page 4 of 27
6th Grade 6th Grade 72% 70.5% 70.4% 70.3% 68% 65.9% 65.4% 64% 60% 59.7% 56% 57.5% 55.9% 52% 48% 46.0% 44% Mathematics Social Studies District Similar Districts State Average 100% 90% 70% 60% 50% 40% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mathematics Social Studies 7th Grade 7th Grade 78% 76% 74% 72% 70% 68% 66% 64% 78.2% 69.5% 68.6% 67.3% 64.7% 65.3% Mathematics 100% 95% 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 District Similar Districts State Average Mathematics 8th Grade 8th Grade 84% 81.7% 76% 71.8% 72% 68.7% 68.3% 68% 66.7% 64% 63.6% 62.3% 60% 56% 53.7% 53.7% 52% Mathematics Science District Similar Districts State Average 100% 95% 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 60% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mathematics Science Page 5 of 27
10th Grade OGT 96% 93.0% 92% 91.1% 86.4% 84.9% 89.1% 88% 87.2% 85.7% 85.1% 81.5% 83.9% 84% 83.4% 82.2% 82.2% 76.5% 76% 74.8% 72% Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science District Similar Districts State Average 100% 95% 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 60% 10th Grade OGT 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 92.2% 94% 91.7% 92.7% 92.1% 92% 90.1% 90% 89.2% 89.5% 88.2% 88.7% 88.4% 88% 87.3% 87.0% 86.3% 86% 84.7% 84% 83.3% 82% Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science District Similar Districts State Average 100% 96% 92% 88% 84% 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science Page 6 of 27
Gifted Students The Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities for and performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers several questions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services? How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are being met for gifted students. INDICATOR Not Met The Gifted Indicator is derived from three components: Gifted Value Added grade, the Performance Index for gifted students, and a Gifted Inputs score. Value Added Grade: Enrollment: Value Added Met? Performance Index: Performance Index Met?: Not Met A 1,536 1 Gifted Value Added Districts must earn a Gifted Value Added grade of C or better to meet the Gifted Value Added component. A grade of "NR" results in Not Met if the district has an ADM of 600 or more. Gifted Performance Index 114.3 Overview Districts with at least 10 unique students in the Gifted Performance Index calculation must score 115.0 or better to meet the Gifted Performance Index component. Gifted Inputs 20 0 40 60 80 100 95.3% 114.3 of a possible 120.0 A = 90.0-10 B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D =50.0-69.9% F = 0.0-49.9% Performance Index The Performance Index calculation for gifted students. Only tests taken by students identified as gifted in that subject (e.g. gifted in Math and taking the Math test), or taken by students identified with Super Cognitive abilities regardless of test subject are included. Achievement Level Pct of Students Points for this Level Points Received Advanced Plus 0.0 x 1.3 = 0.0 Advanced 46.3 x 1.2 = 55.6 Accelerated 50.4 x 1.1 = 55.4 Proficient 3.3 x 1.0 = 3.3 Basic 0.0 x 0.6 = 0.0 Limited 0.0 x 0.3 = 0.0 Untested 0.0 x 0.0 = 0.0 114.3 Total Points: Gifted Inputs Met?: 26.0 Not Met Points are earned based on identification and services provided to gifted students. Districts must earn at least 40 points out of a possible 100 to meet the Gifted Inputs component. 3.3 INDICATOR Not Met Gifted Indicator Final Result The Gifted Indicator is Met if none of the three components are Not Met. Gifted Inputs alone cannot determine the Gifted Indicator, however; if both the Value Added and Performance Index components are NC, then the Gifted Indicator is also NC. 50.4 46.3 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested Page 7 of 27
Gifted Indicator The Gifted Inputs calculation assigns points based on the percentage of students identified and served in eight categories (factors). The points earned for each category are totaled to determine the final Met/Not Met determination for the Gifted Input component., Math, Science, Social Studies, and Superior Cognitive Abilities K-3 4-8 9-12 98.3% 1.7% 91.6% 3.4% 5.0% 85.6% 14.4% Visual/Performing Arts and Creative Thinking K-3 4-8 9-12 10 10 10 Disadvantaged Students Minority Students 95.9% 3.3% 0.9% 94.5% 0.8% 4.7% Receiving Gifted Services Identified as Gifted, but not receiving services Not Identified as Gifted Page 8 of 27
Identification and Services These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 7.0% 2.4% 2.0% 1.6% 2.3% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 3.9% 1.4% 0.8% 0.5% Math Superior Cognitive 1.2% 0.8% 0.4% Identified Receiving Services Identified Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 7.4% 12.0% 1 8.0% 9.6% 11.4% 4.0% 6.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 2.9% 3.2% 1.3% 1.1% Math Superior Cognitive 4.0% 2.0% 0.9% Math Superior Cognitive Identified Receiving Services Identified Page 9 of 27
Identified and Receiving Services These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 7 6 60.4% 60 40 5 20 4 3 2 20.2% -20 1-40 Math Superior Cognitive -60 Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 10 60 8 87.0% 40 6 20 4 43.5% -20 2-40 Math Superior Cognitive -60 Math Superior Cognitive Page 10 of 27
Screening Acceleration This chart shows the percentage of students screened for gifted abilities this school year. 10% 9.0% Number of Subject Accelerated Students: 8% 0 6% 4% 2% Number of Whole-Grade Accelerated Students: 0 0% 0.1% Math Social Studies Science Superior Cognitive Page 11 of 27
Progress This is your district s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. It answers the question Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 GRADE A GRADE A GRADE B GRADE C GRADE Coming in 2018 GRADE NR Overall This measures the progress for all students in math and reading, grades 4-8. Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability. Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20% statewide in reading and math achievement. Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. High School A High School measure of progress will be reported in the 2014-15 school year. High Mobility For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, this measures the progress of a subset of students that have been in the district for at least two years. This measure will not be included in the Progress component grade. Test Grade All Grades 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade High School Progress Details This table shows the Progress scores by test grade and subject, and includes up to three years of data as available. Progress Score English Language Arts Mathematics All Tests Although Progress scores are not assigned letter grades at this level of detail, the grading scale applied at the Overall (All Students, All Tests) level is: 9.54 1.12 7.35 3.33-0.07 2.21 5.02 2.53 5.00 0.47-0.97-0.25 3.93-3.76 0.45 8.51 4.47 8.85 5.93-0.22 3.90 A = 2.00 and up B = 1.00 to 1.99 C = -1.00 to 0.99 D = -2.00 to -1.01 F = below -2.00 Page 12 of 27
Progress vs. Performance Index This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's Performance Index results (horizontal axis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the student subgroup. A B Grade C Overall Students w/ Disabilities Lowest 20% Gifted D F 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Performance Index Page 13 of 27
Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 GRADE B Annual Measurable Objectives Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels. Math Graduation Rate AMO Points 40 60 82.5 68.8 93.3 20 0 80 100 81.9 68.4 81.7 67.9 89.5 85 84.7% A = 90.0-10 B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D = 60.0-69.9% F = 0.0-59.9% 81.4 77.4 35.7 66.7 61.8 39.8 87.8 84.8 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Multiracial White Econ Disadvantage All Students African American Students w/ Disabilities White All Students Multiracial African American Econ Disadvantage Students w/ Disabilities Students w/ Disabilities White All Students Econ Disadvantage The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2015 AMO for is 71.3%, for Math is 65.0%, and for Graduation Rate is 80.5%. Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs. Page 14 of 27
Graduation Rate This grade represents the percentage of students whom entered the 9th grade and graduated 4 and 5 years later. COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2014 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2011 and graduated by 2014. 4-Year Rate 5-Year Rate GRADE B 89.5% A = 93.0-10 B = 89.0-92.9% C = 84.0-88.9% D = 79.0-83.9% F = 0.0-78.9% 20 0 40 60 80 100 100 80 60 89.5 89.7 82.2 100 80 60 91.7 91.2 84.5 5-Year Graduation Rate The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2013 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2010 and graduated by 2014. GRADE B 91.7% A = 95.0-10 B = 90.0-94.9% C = 85.0-89.9% D = 80.0-84.9% F = 0.0-79.9% 20 0 40 60 80 100 40 20 0 District State Average Similar Districts 40 20 0 District State Average Similar Districts Page 15 of 27
Graduation Rate Trend 96% 92% 91.7% 90.9% 89.5% 88% 85.9% 84% 83.0% 76% 75.7% 77.8% 75.9% 72% 72.4% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 4-Year 5-Year Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year. Page 16 of 27
K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question - Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 GRADE In Your District... Details of Measure A K-3 Literacy Improvement < 10 NC kindergarten students were not on-track last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 1st grade. Not On-Track at Point A Kindergarten Diagnostic, School Year 2013-2014 < 10 to Improving to On-Track at Point B 1st Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 < 10 20 0 40 60 80 100 < 10 NC first grade students were not on-track last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 2nd grade. 1st Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2013-2014 2nd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2013-2014 < 10 to < 10 to 2nd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 3rd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 < 10 < 10 92.0% 69 out of 75 A = 82.6-10 B = 64.9-82.5% C = 47.2-64.8% D = 29.5-47.1% F = 0.0-29.4% < 10 NC < 10 second grade students were not ontrack last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 3rd grade. third grade students were not on-track this year. 3rd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 < 10 to 3rd Grade OAA, School Year 2014-2015 Deduction for 3rd graders who did not pass OAA and were not on a Improvement and Monitoring Plan < 10 NC Totals 75 69 of those students reached proficiency NC on the 3rd grade OAA. Page 17 of 27
Percentage On-Track in Diagnostic Third Grade Guarantee Kindergarten Diagnostic First Grade Diagnostic Second Grade Diagnostic 68.1% 98.4% 96.2% 31.9% 1.6% 3.8% On- Track Not On-Track Ohio's Third Grade Guarantee ensures that students are successful in reading before moving on to fourth grade. Schools must provide supports for struggling readers in early grades. If a child appears to be falling behind in reading, the school will immediately start a Improvement and Monitoring Plan. The program ensures that every struggling reader gets the support he or she needs to learn and achieve. Students have multiple opportunities to meet promotion requirements including meeting a minimum promotion score on the third grade state reading tests given in the fall and spring. Students have an additional opportunity to take the state assessment in the summer, as well as a district-determined alternative assessment. Third Grade Diagnostic 99.2% 0.8% The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the Third Grade How many third Guarantee graders applies met the to Third your Grade child. 92.4% Coming Guarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade? Soon 0% 20% 40% 60% 100% This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each grade level reading diagnostic in 2014-2015. How many third graders scored proficient on the state test? 84.5% Coming Soon Page 18 of 27
Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from your district ready for college or a career? There are many ways to show that graduates are prepared. COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 How Prepared was Your 2014 Graduating Class? Outcomes after High School Graduation ACT: Participation ACT: Remediation Free SAT: Participation 10.5% 50.4% Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Prepared for Success component provides information on how schools prepare students for different pathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on how those students do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma is an important indicator of how well schools are preparing students. SAT: Remediation Free The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment and remediation of high school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and universities. Honors Diploma Industry-Recognized Credential 3.0% Additional data on outcomes after high school are coming soon. These will include college graduation, demographics of college enrollees, workforce and military enlistment. Advanced Placement: Participation 9.8% AP: Exam Score of 3 or Better Dual Enrollment Credit 3.0% International Baccalaureate IB: Exam Score of 4 or Better 0% 20% 40% 60% 100% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year graduation rate, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2011. Page 19 of 27
Superintendent: Mark A. Christian Address: 302 High St South Point OH 45680 Directory information current as of the 2014-2015 Report Card publication date Phone: (740) 377-4315 County: Career Tech Planning District: Lawrence Lawrence County JVSD CTPD Your District's Students Average Daily Enrollment: 1,579 Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Excluded from Accountability Calculations: -- Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficiency Migrant Enrollment by Subgroup Enrollment # Enrollment % NC 11 95 15 93 1,365 197 1,034 NC NC 0.7% 6.0% 1.0% 5.9% 86.5% 12.5% 65.5% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group State and federal law require an annual assessment of Limited English Proficient (LEP) students to measure their English language proficiency. The Ohio Test of English Language Acquisition (OTELA) is the assessment used in Ohio to gauge LEP students' growth in learning English. For information about your district's OTELA results, see the Department of Education's web site at http://education.ohio.gov. 100% 60% 40% 20% 0% American Indian or Alaska... 6.0% 5.9% 0.7% 1.0% 86.5% 12.5% Asian or Pacific Islander 65.5% Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Migrant Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Enrollments of less than 10 students are not shown. Page 20 of 27
Attendance Chronic Absenteeism Rate: 11.2% Attendance Rate All Students 95.2% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native NC Asian or Pacific Islander 93.5% Black, Non-Hispanic 95.5% Hispanic 95.1% Multiracial 95.3% White, Non-Hispanic 95.2% Students with Disabilities 94.6% Economic Disadvantage 94.5% Limited English Proficiency NC Migrant NC Male 95.2% Female 95.2% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group 100% 60% 40% 20% 0% 95.2% 93.5% 95.5%95.1%95.3%95.2%94.6%94.5% All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 10. Page 21 of 27
Mobility Rates by Subgroup District Mobility % All Students 16.3% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native NC Asian or Pacific Islander 8.3% Black, Non-Hispanic 16.4% Hispanic 22.2% Multiracial 9.1% White, Non-Hispanic 16.7% Students with Disabilities 18.0% Economically Disadvantaged 18.0% Limited English Proficiency NC Migrant NC 24% 20% 16% 12% 8% 4% 0% 16.3% 8.3% 16.4% 22.2% 9.1% 18.0% 18.0% 16.7% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Migrant Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they moved into or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year within the district. Page 22 of 27
Wellness and Physical Education The extent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards Compliance with the federal requirement for implementing a local wellness policy Elected to administer BMI screening Participation in Physical Activity Pilot Program Moderate Success School Choice Options: Place of Enrollment for Students Residing in the District The School Choice Options data is a set of nine counts describing the place of enrollment for students residing in the school district, captured as a snapshot of a single day in the school year. Web links provide further information about certain options. Districts and STEM Schools Community Schools Non-Public Schools* choice options coming soon 0 students enrolled in the district 0 students enrolled in an online where they lived community school 0 students enrolled in another public district through Open Enrollment 0 students enrolled in another public district by means other than Open Enrollment 0 students enrolled in a sitebased community school 0 students enrolled in a Dropout Prevention and Recovery Program (online or site-based) 0 students participated in the EdChoice Scholarship or Cleveland Scholarship Program 0 students participated in the EdChoice Expansion Program 0 students participated in the Ohio Autism Scholarship or Jon Peterson Special Needs Scholarship Program Fine Arts Courses Offered No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. No Fine Arts Courses are offered by this district. *ODE does not collect and cannot report information on district residents who are nonvoucher students attending a non-public school. Page 23 of 27
Financial Data These measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroom instruction? How much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do these measures compare to other districts and schools? Comparison Group: Enrollment between 1000 and 2499 Classroom Spending Data Spending per Pupil Data District State What percent of funds are spent on classroom instruction? 65.7% How does this district rank in comparison to other districts of similar size? 166 out of 276 A rank of 1 indicates the highest percent spent on classroom instruction. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Operating Spending per Pupil $8,830 $9,228 Classroom Instruction $5,806 $6,211 Non-Classroom Spending $3,024 $3,016 District District Comparison Group State 34.3% 33.3% 32.7% State 65.7% 66.7% 67.3% $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction South Point Local IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with the lowest operating expenditures per pupil South Point Local IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with the highest academic performance index scores. Note: District financial data do not include data associated with community schools that are sponsored by the school district. Page 24 of 27
Spending and Performance This measure answers the question what is the relationship of average spending per student to performance, and how does that compare to similar districts and schools? Similar Districts Comparison Group All Districts 120.0 120.0 120.0 110.0 110.0 110.0 Performance Index 100.0 90.0 Performance Index 100.0 90.0 Performance Index 100.0 90.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 60.0 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 $20,000 $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 60.0 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 $20,000 $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 60.0 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 $20,000 $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 Spending per Pupil Spending per Pupil Spending per Pupil Page 25 of 27
Source of Revenue Source of Funds District State Total Local State Federal Other Non-Tax Total $3,403,188 18.2% $12,777,931 68.4% $2,021,190 10.8% $467,351 2.5% $18,669,660 10 $8,465,909,321 39.4% $9,920,347,064 46.1% $1,617,676,379 7.5% $1,492,334,587 6.9% $21,496,267,351 10 District State 46% 68% 11% 3% 7% 18% 8% 39% Local Federal State Other Non-Tax Local State Federal Other Non-Tax Page 26 of 27
Superintendent: Address: Mark A. Christian 302 High St South Point OH 45680 Phone: County: (740) 377-4315 Lawrence School Achievement Performance Index Indicators Met Your District's Schools Overall Gifted Progress Lowest 20% Achieve Students with Disabilitie s Gap Closing Annual Measurable Objectives Graduation Rate 4-Year Graduation Rate 5-Year Graduation Rate K-3 Literacy Burlington Elementary School C C A C A C B NR NR NR South Point Elementary School C D A A C NR B NR NR B South Point High School B D NR NR NR NR A B B NR South Point Middle School C C A A C C F NR NR NR K-3 Literacy Page 27 of 27