SCHOOL REPORT CARD District: CENTER 58 (048080) School: CENTER MIDDLE (2100)

Similar documents
Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Shelters Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Transportation Equity Analysis

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

12-month Enrollment

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Cooper Upper Elementary School

46 Children s Defense Fund

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

World s Best Workforce Plan

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Raw Data Files Instructions

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity


Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

African American Male Achievement Update

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

University of Arizona

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Best Colleges Main Survey

State of New Jersey

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Engage Educate Empower

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Hokulani Elementary School

Evaluation of Teach For America:

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Kahului Elementary School

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Educational Attainment

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Freshman Admission Application 2016

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Academic Advising and Career Exploration. PLTW State Conference 2015 Bayless School District

Legacy of NAACP Salary equalization suits.

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Clark Lane Middle School

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Conroe Independent School District

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Transcription:

Grade Span: 06-08 Title I School: Missouri School Improvement Program - Annual Performance Report (1) Preschool Enrollment CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE 0 1 0 0 0 (2) K-12 Enrollment CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE Total 542 519 525 531 567 Asian * * * * * Black 67.7% 67.8% 69.3% 67.2% 64.9% Hispanic 7.7% 6.7% 7.6% 8.7% 10.6% Indian 0.0% * 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 17.0% 17.9% 16.8% 17.1% 17.3% * - Indicates the percent has been suppressed due to a potential small sample size. 1

(3) Proportional Attendance CENTER MIDDLE 88.7% 87.1% 85.5% 86.0% 83.7% Asian 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 84.1% Black 88.4% 87.3% 85.7% 84.6% 80.2% Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 100.0% 100.0% Hispanic 87.7% 91.0% 91.8% 90.5% 92.6% Indian 100.0% 0.0% White 92.3% 84.1% 81.2% 89.9% 89.8% Multi-Race 77.9% 84.9% 83.6% 78.5% 87.8% Female 90.5% 88.0% 86.4% 87.2% 84.9% Male 87.0% 86.3% 84.6% 84.7% 82.4% Free or Reduced Lunch 86.7% 85.1% 83.3% 83.1% 80.7% Limited English Proficient 90.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.4% Special Education 86.9% 80.5% 73.3% 81.9% 78.6% (4) Students Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE Percent 78.4% 79.0% 77.1% 78.7% 74.4% Number 425 411 403 426 422 2

(5) Four- Year Graduation CENTER MIDDLE Asian Black Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Hispanic Indian White Multi-Race Female Male Free or Reduced Lunch Limited English Proficient Special Education * - Indicates the percent was 25 percent or below and has been suppressed from this report. Targets Graduation Target = 92% 3

(5) Five- Year Graduation CENTER MIDDLE Asian Black Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Hispanic Indian White Multi-Race Female Male Free or Reduced Lunch Limited English Proficient Special Education * - Indicates the percent was 25 percent or below and has been suppressed from this report. Targets Graduation Target = 92% (6) Dropout CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE TOTAL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Black 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hispanic 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Indian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 White 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4

(7) Where Our Graduates Go CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE Entering a 4yr. College/University 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Entering a 2yr. College 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Entering a Postsecondary (Technical) Institution 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (8) Placement s for Career- Technical Education Students CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE (9) Staffing Ratios CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE Students to classroom teachers 13 13 13 13 15 Students to administrators 181 173 175 152 162 (10) Years of Experience of Professional Staff CENTER 58-11.7 11.6 11.4 11.9 12.7 (11) Professional Staff with Advanced Degrees CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE 64.8 64.7 62.2 58.0 61.8 5

(12) Average Teacher Salaries CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE Average Regular Term Salary $50,108 $51,309 $50,347 $50,290 $52,353 Average Total Salary $52,005 $53,732 $52,527 $52,712 $54,532 (13) Average Administrator Salaries CENTER MIDDLE $81,807 $84,670 $84,928 $86,177 $88,602 (14) Missouri Assessment Program (MAP) Results Assessment results for 2015 and 2016 in the content areas of English language arts, and mathematics for grades 3-8 and End-of-Course (EOC) assessments in English II (E2) and Algebra I (A1) are not comparable to prior year data. The assessments have been aligned to the new standards. Link to Prior Year MAP data Content Area Grade Year Accountable Reportable LND Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Eng. Language Arts 2017 559 516 0.0 26.7 26.0 36.0 11.2 Eng. Language Arts 06 2015 176 176 0.0 27.3 26.1 32.4 14.2 Eng. Language Arts 06 2016 180 180 0.0 25.0 33.3 32.2 9.4 Eng. Language Arts 06 2017 203 203 0.0 24.1 30.5 36.5 8.9 Eng. Language Arts 07 2015 174 174 0.0 23.0 33.3 35.1 8.6 Eng. Language Arts 07 2016 191 191 0.0 36.1 22.5 34.0 7.3 Eng. Language Arts 07 2017 177 177 0.0 32.2 24.3 31.6 11.9 Eng. Language Arts 08 2015 180 180 0.0 12.2 35.6 41.1 11.1 Eng. Language Arts 08 2016 171 171 0.0 26.3 26.9 36.3 10.5 Eng. Language Arts 08 2017 180 180 0.0 26.1 24.4 38.3 11.1 Mathematics 2017 384 352 0.0 32.1 37.8 19.6 10.5 Mathematics 06 2015 175 175 0.0 37.7 30.3 21.7 10.3 6

Content Area Grade Year Accountable Reportable LND Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Mathematics 06 2016 181 181 0.0 24.9 43.1 21.5 10.5 Mathematics 06 2017 202 202 0.0 28.7 35.1 22.3 13.9 Mathematics 07 2015 158 158 0.0 37.3 51.3 9.5 1.9 Mathematics 07 2016 187 187 0.0 34.8 49.2 14.4 1.6 Mathematics 07 2017 172 172 0.0 38.4 41.3 15.7 4.7 Mathematics 08 2015 * * 0.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 Mathematics 08 2016 * * 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 Mathematics 08 2017 * * 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 Mathematics A1 2015 183 183 0.0 29.5 28.4 35.0 7.1 Mathematics A1 2016 160 160 0.0 17.5 28.1 50.6 3.8 Mathematics GE 2015 * * 0.0 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 Mathematics GE 2016 14 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 Mathematics GE 2017 * * 0.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 50.0 Science 2017 181 165 0.0 27.9 40.0 27.3 4.8 Science 08 2015 179 179 0.0 19.6 48.0 26.3 6.1 Science 08 2016 173 173 0.0 29.5 38.2 30.1 2.3 Science 08 2017 181 181 0.0 29.3 37.6 28.7 4.4 (15) ACT Results 7

(16) Disciplinary Actions CENTER MIDDLE Suspensions of 10 or More Consecutive Days (number rate) 28 5.2 24 4.6 27 5.1 21 4.0 44 7.8 Expulsions (number rate) 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.4 (17) ESEA - Annual Measurable Objective 2013 2014 2015 2016 English Language Arts Race/Ethnicity Amer. Indian or Alaska Native * * Asian/Pacific Islander * * * * * * * * Black (not Hispanic) 100.0% 37.00% N 100.0% 36.20% N 100.0% 43.00% N 100.0% 33.60% Hispanic 100.0% 45.90% N 100.0% 43.80% N 100.0% 55.90% N 100.0% 53.70% Multiracial * * 100.0% 37.00% N * * * * White (not Hispanic) 100.0% 76.70% Y 100.0% 64.00% Y 100.0% 66.70% Y 100.0% 75.30% Special Programs IEP Student 100.0% 13.70% N 100.0% 24.10% N 100.0% 28.80% N 100.0% 22.70% LEP Students * * * * * * * * Map Free and Reduced Lunch 100.0% 38.50% N 100.0% 34.60% N 100.0% 42.50% N 100.0% 37.50% Super Subgroup 100.0% 41.80% N 100.0% 38.20% N 100.0% 46.10% N 100.0% 40.05% Total Total 100.0% 46.20% N 100.0% 42.30% N 100.0% 49.60% N 100.0% 44.90% Mathematics 8

2017 * * 100.0% 37.90% 100.0% 50.90% 100.0% 56.30% 100.0% 75.30% 100.0% 15.20% * * 100.0% 41.60% 100.0% 42.08% 100.0% 47.30% 9

Race/Ethnicity 2013 2014 2015 2016 Amer. Indian or Alaska Native * * Asian/Pacific Islander * * * * * * * * Black (not Hispanic) 100.0% 35.20% N 100.0% 33.50% N 100.0% 24.20% N 100.0% 27.40% Hispanic 100.0% 37.10% N 100.0% 35.50% N 100.0% 35.30% N 100.0% 40.50% Multiracial * * 100.0% 46.20% N * * * * White (not Hispanic) 100.0% 68.30% Y 99.0% 65.10% Y 100.0% 53.60% N 100.0% 64.70% Special Programs IEP Student 100.0% 17.60% N 98.2% 22.60% N 100.0% 11.50% N 100.0% 13.30% LEP Students * * * * * * * * Map Free and Reduced Lunch 100.0% 37.20% N 100.0% 34.40% N 100.0% 26.60% N 100.0% 31.10% Super Subgroup 100.0% 39.50% N 99.8% 37.40% N 100.0% 28.20% N 100.0% 32.13% Total Total 100.0% 42.90% N 99.8% 40.90% N 100.0% 32.10% N 100.0% 36.90% Super Subgroup is an unduplicated count of students identified as IEP, LEP, FRL, Black(not Hispanic), Hispanic. Y = Met Target N = Did Not Meet Target * = A cell size of 30 accountable students was not met. Targets 2012 ELA = 56.2%, Super Subgroup = 44.21% 2013 ELA = 57.9%, Super Subgroup = 46.61% 2014 ELA = 59.6%, Super Subgroup = 49.02% 2015 ELA = 61.3%, Super Subgroup = 51.42% 2012 Math = 56.4%, Super Subgroup = 44.78% 2013 Math = 58.6%, Super Subgroup = 47.67% 2014 Math = 60.8%, Super Subgroup = 50.55% 2015 Math = 63.0%, Super Subgroup = 53.43% * = A cell size of 30 reportable students was not met. 10

2017 * * 100.0% 20.20% 100.0% 30.80% * * 100.0% 56.30% 100.0% 4.50% * * 100.0% 21.80% 100.0% 22.55% 100.0% 29.50% 11

(18) Students in Gifted Education Program CENTER 58 - CENTER MIDDLE Percent 6.9% 7.1% 5.7% 5.5% 5.1% Number 42 42 34 33 32 12