Government of Karnataka Report On POST ENUMERATION SURVEY OF DISE DATA in Three Districts of Karnataka Percentage Deviation and Precision between DISE and PES data (Summary) Deviation, 0.18 Precision, 99.82 CENTRE FOR MULTI DISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ( CMDR) Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Nagar, Lakamanahalli, Dharwad - 04 Web:www.cmdr.co.in i
Research Team Dr.Sailabala Debi Dr.A.R.Kulkarni Mr.D.R.Revankar Teachnical Support Mr.B.P.Bagalkot Mr.Gururaj Haribhat Mr.Jayateerth Purohit Mr.Mukund Kallapur ii
POST ENUMERATION SURVEY OF DISE DATA in Three Districts of Karnataka Chapter No. CONTENTS Title Page No s Acknowledgement iv List of Abbreviations v List of Tables vi-x Executive Summary xi-xii I Introduction 1-6 II DISE & PES Comparative Tables : Deviation and Precision Levels 7-50 III Information on Feedback Schedule 51-58 IV Summary and Conclusions 59-61 APEENDIX Appendix I : Schedules 62-66 Appendix II : List Of Schools Surveyed 67-73 iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Education is considered to be one of the crucial inputs to human resource development. Education enhances the skill, efficiency, productivity and overall quality of life of the recipients of education. In view of this, it is made mandatory for the state to provide free and compulsory elementary education to all the children of 6-14 years by Universalizing the elementary education. The Govt of India and all the state govts have made sincere and concerted efforts in this direction through various programmes and policies since independence. SSA is one such innovative programme to provide Education for All. The government of Karnataka is considered as one of the pioneering states in respect of educational development and it is nearing to achieve the UEE. The State project Directorate of SSA among all other assignments is responsible of collection and compilation of base line data on education at the disaggregated level, particularly at the district level, known as DISE (District Information System for Education). It was decided to validate the DISE data by undertaking post enumeration survey in three selected districts of Karnataka. The districts selected for the purpose are Dakshina kannda, Chitradurga and Gulbarga. The present study is an attempt in this direction. It was an excellent and unique opportunity for us at the Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (CMDR), Dharwad to be entrusted with the most challenging and innovative assignment for undertaking the present study of PES of DISE data. I record my sincere and special thanks to Sri L.K.Atheeq, IAS, State Project Director, SSA, Karnataka for assigning the responsibility of the present study to CMDR. I would like to thank Mr Aradhya, SSA unit and Prof. Sitaramu, Mr.Muthy of EMIS, Govt of Karnataka for their constant help and co-operation throughout the study. The report is the outcome of the sincere efforts of Dr A.R.Kulkarni, Associate Fellow, CMDR, Sri Mr.D.R.Revankar, Research Assistant, CMDR. They deserve special thanks. I am grateful to Prof. P.R.Panchamukhi, Founder Director and Professor Emeritus, CMDR, for his constant guidance and inspiration for completion of the study. My thanks are due to Dr.V.B.Annigeri, Reader, CMDR, Dr.Nayanatara S.Nayak, Reader, CMDR, for their cooperation. I express my sincere thanks to the administrative and accounts staff of CMDR, computer unit of CMDR for their constant help and cooperation. My special thanks are due to Mr B.P. Bagalkot for taking great pain for typing, aligning etc. to bring out the report to its present shape. The help and cooperation of CMDR Library staffs deserve to be acknowledged. Our special and sincere thanks to the members of the head masters of the sample schools, BRC and CRC coordinators and other concerned officials of the three districts who extended their full cooperation for providing the relevant information during the survey. Last but not the least all the field investigators deserve special thanks for data collection work. Dharwad Prof. Sailabala Debi 02.7.2007 Director, CMDR iv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BRC CMDR CRC DCF DISE EMIS HPS LPS PES SC SSA ST VEC Block Resource Centre Centre for Multi Disciplinary Development Research Cluster Resource Centre Data collection format District Information System for Education Educational Management and Information System Higher Primary Schools Lower primary schools Post Enumeration Survey Scheduled Castes Sarva Sikshsha Abhiyan Scheduled Tribes Village Education Committee v
LIST OF TABLES Table No. Table Title Page No. Table : 1.1 Table: 2.1 Sampling size of EMIS Schools by District and levels of Educations Dakshina Kannada Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Category of Sample Schools 5 >>> 7 Table: 2.2 Location of sample schools >>> 8 Table: 2.3 Lowest class in the school >>> 9 Table: 2.4 Table: 2.5 Table: 2.6 Table: 2.7 Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Highest Class in the Schools Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: School Management Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Type of School Building Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Status of School Building >>> 10 >>> 10 >>> 11 >>> 12 Table: 2.8 No of class rooms in the school >>> 12 Table: 2.9 Teachers in position in sample schools >>> 13 Table: 2.10 Comparison of examination results between DISE and PES data >>> 14 Table: 2.11 Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Enrollment >>> 15 Table: 2.12 Enrolment of children in the school >>> 16 Table: 2.13 Enrolment of disability children >>> 17 Table: 2.14 Comparison of repeaters between DISE and PES >>> 18 Table: 2.15 Incentive for text books: comparison between DISE and PES data >>> 19 Table: 2.16 Attendance of children in the schools >>> 20 vi
LIST OF TABLES (Contd..) Table No. Table Title Page No. Table: 2.17 Chitradurga Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Category of Sample Schools >>> 21 Table: 2.18 Location of sample schools >>> 22 Table: 2.19 Lowest class in the school >>> 23 Table: 2.20 Table: 2.21 Table: 2.22 Table: 2.23 Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Highest Class in the Schools Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: School Management Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Type of School Building Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Status of School Building >>> 24 >>> 24 >>> 25 >>> 26 Table: 2.24 No of class rooms in the school >>> 27 Table: 2.25 Teachers in position in sample schools >>> 28 Table: 2.26 Comparison of examination results between DISE and PES data >>> 29 Table: 2.27 Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Enrollment >>> 30 Table: 2.28 Enrolment of children in the school >>> 31 Table: 2.29 Enrolment of disability children >>> 32 Table: 2.30 Comparison of repeaters between DISE and PES >>> 33 Table: 2.31 Incentive for text books: comparison between DISE and PES data >>> 34 Table: 2.32 Attendance of children in the schools >>> 35 vii
LIST OF TABLES (Contd..) Table No. Table Title Page No. Table: 2.33 Gulbarga Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Category of Sample Schools >>> 36 Table: 2.34 Location of sample schools >>> 37 Table: 2.35 Lowest class in the school >>> 38 Table: 2.36 Table: 2.37 Table: 2.38 Table: 2.39 Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Highest Class in the Schools Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: School Management Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Type of School Building Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Status of School Building >>> 39 >>> 39 >>> 40 >>> 41 Table: 2.40 No of class rooms in the school >>> 42 Table: 2.41 Teachers in position in sample schools >>> 43 Table: 2.42 Comparison of examination results between DISE and PES data >>> 44 Table: 2.43 Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Enrollment >>> 45 Table: 2.44 Enrolment of children in the school >>> 46 Table: 2.45 Enrolment of disability children >>> 47 Table: 2.46 Comparison of repeaters between DISE and PES >>> 48 Table: 2.47 Incentive for text books: comparison between DISE and PES data >>> 49 Table: 2.48 Attendance of children in the schools >>> 50 viii
LIST OF TABLES (Contd..) Table No. Table Title Page No. Table: 3.1 Table: 3.2 Table: 3.3 Table: 3.4 Attributes Pertaining to the Head Teacher (HT) and the Investigator Attributes Pertaining to the Head Teacher (HT) and the Investigator (%) Place of Training of Head Teacher in conection with DISE Implementation (No) Place of Training of Head Teacher in connection with DISE Implementation (%) >>> 51 >>> 52 >>> 53 >>> 53 Table: 3.5 Duration of Training of Head Teacher >>> 53 Table: 3.6 Duration of Training of Head Teacher (%) >>> 53 Table: 3.7 Resource Centres Conducting Training (No) >>> 54 Table: 3.8 Resource Centres Conducting Training (%) >>> 54 Table: 3.9 Explanation of the DCF Concept (No) >>> 54 Table: 3.10 Explanation of the DCF Concept (%) >>> 54 Table: 3.11 Removal of Doubts (Nos) >>> 55 Table: 3.12 Removal of Doubts (%) >>> 55 Table: 3.13 Table: 3.14 Provision of Data by the Teacher who Obtained Training (Nos) Provision of Data by the Teacher who Obtained Training (%) >>> 55 >>> 55 Table: 3.15 Schools Receiving School Summary Report (Nos) >>> 56 Table: 3.16 Schools Receiving School Summary Report (%) >>> 56 Table: 3.17 Schools Sharing School Summary Report with VEC >>> 56 Table: 3.18 Schools Sharing School Summary Report with VEC (%) >>> 57 Table: 3.19 School Summary Report Reflecting Real Situation in School >>> 57 ix
LIST OF TABLES (Concld.) Table No. Table Title Page No. Table: 3.20 School Summary Report Reflecting Real Situation in School (%) >>> 57 Table: 3.21 No of Visits by CRC Coordinator to the School >>> 57 Table: 3.22 Teachers Who Received In-service Training under DPEP >>> 58 Table: 4.1 Chart 4.1 Percentage deviation and precision between DISE and PES data (summary) Percentage Deviation and Precision between DISE and PES data (Summary) >>> 60 >>> 60 x
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E1.The present study attempted to validate the DISE data at primary and higher primary education in three districts of Karnataka through post enumeration survey (PES) of the DISE data. The selected districts are Gulbarga (special focused districts), Chitradurga (literacy rate below state literacy rate), and Dakshina Kannada (literacy Rate above state average). The levels of education covered under this study are primary and higher primary, both Govt. and private aided schools. District Information System for Education (DISE)-Special DCF (Data Collection Format) for Post Enumeration Survey (PES) and Instruction Manual for Special DCF were provided by the Directorate of SSA. E2. The study collected the data from three districts covering 5 % of the total primary and higher primary schools. The schools are proportionately distributed between rural and urban and in the areas of high concentration of SC/ ST and minority population. The total number schools considered for the selection of sample were 5140 of which 5054 are govt schools and 86 are aided schools. We have covered 46 schools from Dakshana Kannada, 86 schools from Chitradurga and 128 schools from Gulbarga districts. Thus a total of 260 schools which include 254 Govt schools, 6 Aided schools. E3. (i) It is found that there is no difference between DISE and PES data /information relating to almost all the indicators of education for the three sample districts. The overall deviation of DISE data from PES data taking into consideration all the items and sub items for all the three districts is less than 1 per cent (0.18%) giving a precision level of 99.82 percent for DISE data with respect to PES data. If one goes statistically it can be considered as 100 per cent accurate between DISE and PES as the precision value is 99.82 per cent. (ii) Across Districts, it is found that the deviation of DISE data from PES data in all the districts is less than 1 per cent but the deviation is the lowest in Dakshina Kannada district. This indicates that the collection and maintenance of data in DISE is very well xi
done by the concerned officials/units at the district level. There is no manipulation of data any where for any of the indicators as there is no deviation in data between the two surveys. The chart below presents the summary of deviation and precision between DISE and PES data for all the three sample districts. Daviation and Precision between DISE and PES data for all the sample districts Deviation 0.18% Precision 99.82% (iii) There is very negligible deviation per cent between DISE and PES data in respect of enrolment of disable children (1 percent deviation) and number of class room (2 per cent deviation) in Gulbarga district. The deviation at the rate of 2 % is found in case of number of class rooms and type of school buildings in Chitradurga district. In case of Dakshina Kannada district the deviation at the rate of 1 percent is found in case of free text books. However the important indicators like enrolment of all children, enrolment of Scheduled caste and Scheduled tribes, retention, attendance, number of teachers, etc do not show any deviation between DISE and PES data. E4. All above findings indicate that the collection and maintenance of data in DISE is very well done by the concerned officials/units at the district level. There is no manipulation of data any where for any of the indicators as there is no deviation in data between the two surveys. In this background one can infer that the data collection/generation and data preservation through computerization by the Government of Karnataka is found to be done most efficiently. This dimension of efficiency of government of Karnataka can be taken as example for all the states of the country in case of Post Enumeration survey under SSA. This type of systematic maintenance of data would help the policy makers to arrive at a proper policy xii
C h a p t e r I INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Role of EMIS in Primary and Higher Primary Education: In view of the goal of Education for All required to be achieved under severe resource constraints, the SSA has been introduced all over the country and Karnataka is one of the pioneering states in this connection. For achieving the goal of SSA, there is a felt need and increasing demand for better data and information of the education system as a whole in general and primary and higher primary education in particular. In recent years the knowledge revolution has brought out a significant and rapid change in use of technology, the context of education, community participation, new knowledge, skills, innovative methods of teaching -learning, the societal needs etc. In this background it is now pertinent to move in unison with the knowledge revolution keeping in view our broad objectives of education for all under SSA. The education system in our country is very much complex with multiple layers of administrative and decision making points. It is found to be always under funded and politically more sensitive. For formulating any policy for education the availability of correct and unambiguous data base assumes great significance. The data and information about education system are not available in one place and from one source. There are differences in similar data from two/three different sources which actually are not available easily. It was strongly felt by the policy makers, planners and decision makers to make the data easily accessible and available in a more user friendly manner. The introduction of EMIS (Educational Management and Information System) is an innovate step in this direction. EMIS is a system for the collection, integration, processing, maintenance and dissemination of data & information to support in decision making, policy analysis and formulation, planning, monitoring and management of data at all levels of an education system. It provides more accurate, reliable, relevant, unambiguous 1
and timely data/information base to support the overall education system in a comprehensive and integrated manner. The successful EMIS helps: To provide need-based data on education To describe education system more accurately To examine and monitor the attainment of set goals and objectives across the education system To ensure the effective and efficient allocation of resources To assess in delivering and achievement of quality of education system To evaluate the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the education system 1.2 Growth of Education Karnataka has 27 administrative districts and 32 educational districts and 202 educational blocks. The literacy rate of the state was 66.6% in 2001 census. The state has been making satisfactory progress on all the SSA objectives of Access, Equity and Quality. This is clearly evident form the state s continued commitment to investment in elementary education. In 1999 the total expenditure in education by the state was Rs 1542.06 crores and it increased to Rs2665.22 crores in the year 2005-06 showing an annual compound growth rate of 8 %. The provision of mid day meal up to class V and free text books to all the primary school children have significantly contributed to the enrolment and retention at primary level. The state has made concerted efforts o bring down number of out of school children from 187649 in 2003-04 to 7895 in 2005-06. The drop out rate has declined significantly. It has become as low as 9 percent at the primary level (I-V) while at the elementary level (I-VIII) it declined from 32.93 % in 2001-02 to 16.64 % in 2004-05. The retention rate is significantly high as it is 90.97 % at the elementary level which is much higher than the national average of 58.11 %. The access ratio has improved from 93.70 in 2001-02 to98.98 in 2004-05. During the same time it 2
has improved from 89.39 % to 99.19 % for upper primary level. The enrolment has improved from 8.44 million in 2002-03 to 8.83 million in 2005-06. All these data provided by SSA division which are collected under EMIS initiation. Despite the achievements there are disparities in enrolment, retention and performance between and within the districts across Karnataka. The government of Karnataka through SSA is trying hard to overcome all the above said shortcomings. The SSA is conducting regular surveys to monitor and identify the gaps in respect of all the indicators of education. It has also been observed that the EMIS data of SSA has some gaps which is a matter of concern. However SSA division has attempted to achieve the objective of access, equity and quality to a significant extent. The present study attempted to validate the DISE data at primary and higher primary education in three districts of Karnataka through post enumeration survey (PES) of the DISE data. 1.3 Objectives of the Study The broad objectives of the present study are: i) to examine the role of EMIS as laid down when introduced; ii) iii) iv) to verify and validate the data collected through EMIS earlier (DISE); to study the usefulness of EMIS data required for achieving the goal of Primary and Higher Primary education; to assess the successful working of EMIS units at the district level and school level; v) to verify the infrastructure availability (HW,SW, other such accessories, trained computer personnel etc) at the EMIS units at both district and school level; vi) to assess the competence and awareness of head teacher and the computer personnel about EMIS; 3
vii) viii) to examine the evidence of sharing/dissemination of data collected through EMIS; to suggest appropriate measures for improving the quality of EMIS data. 1.4 Collection of Primary Data The Project Directorate of SSA, Karnataka provided the list of total lower primary and Higher/upper primary schools in three selected districts of the state. The selected districts are Gulbarga (special focused districts), Chitradurga (literacy rate below state literacy rate), and Dakshina Kannada (literacy Rate above state average). The levels of education covered under this study are primary and higher primary both Govt. and private aided schools. District Information System for Education (DISE)-Special DCF (Data Collection Format) for Post Enumeration Survey (PES) and Instruction Manual for Special DCF were also provided by the Directorate of SSA. 1.5 Sample Size and Selection Procedure The study collected the data from three districts covering 5 % of the total primary and higher primary schools. The schools are proportionately distributed between rural and urban and in the areas of high concentration of SC/ ST and minority population. There are 5174 schools in three districts of which 34 schools were not categories under any category (e.g. rural, urban. Govt, aided, HPS and LPS etc). Hence the total number schools considered for the selection of sample was 5140 of which 5054 are govt schools and 86 are aided schools. We have covered a total of 260 schools which includes 254 Govt schools, 6 Aided schools. These schools are distributed proportionately between primary and higher primary as well as in rural and urban area schools. Due consideration was made for selecting ST/SC, Minority and girls schools while selecting the sample. The details of sampling breakup are presented in Table 1. 4
Type of School Table 1.1: Sampling Size of EMIS Schools by Districts and levels of Education No of Schools Sample Schools URBAN RURAL TOTAL URBAN RURAL TOTAL Govt. Aided Govt. Aided Govt. Aided Govt. Aided Govt. Aided Govt. Aided CHITRADURGA HPS 54 5 59 693 19 712 747 24 771 3 1 4 34 1 35 37 2 39 LPS 51 51 861 6 867 912 6 918 6 6 40 1 41 46 1 47 105 5 110 1554 25 1579 1659 30 1689 9 1 10 74 2 76 83 3 86 DAKSHINA KANNADA HPS 94 94 531 531 625 0 625 7 7 23 23 30 0 30 LPS 22 22 276 276 298 0 298 1 1 15 15 16 0 16 116 0 116 807 0 807 923 0 923 8 8 38 38 46 0 46 GULBARGA HPS 126 28 154 862 10 872 988 38 1026 9 2 11 59 59 68 2 70 LPS 136 1 137 1348 17 1365 1484 18 1502 4 4 53 1 54 57 1 58 262 29 291 2210 27 2237 2472 56 2528 13 2 15 112 1 113 125 3 128 TOTAL HPS 274 33 307 2086 29 2115 2360 62 2422 19 3 22 116 1 117 135 4 139 LPS 209 1 210 2485 23 2508 2694 24 2718 11 0 11 108 2 110 119 2 121 483 34 517 4571 52 4623 5054 86 5140 30 3 33 224 3 227 254 6 260 1.6 Field Operations and Supervision The field work of post enumeration survey of DISE was conducted and supervised by Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (CMDR), Dharwad with the help of its well trained staff. The field staff was given intensive two days training before the initiation of the field work. This helped in getting reliable data from the field. 1.7 Reference Period The reference period for the DISE data and the post enumeration survey (PES) are the same i.e. 30 th September 2006. But the post enumeration survey (PES) was conducted in the month of May 2007. 1.8 Scrutiny of special DCF for post enumeration survey While scrutinizing the special DCF for post enumeration survey, it was noticed that the data collection has been done by well trained professionals and all entries seem to 5
have been made correctly. We also found that the response error in the process of data collection was nil and it was largely due to the clear understanding of the issues relating the PES of DISE data by the field staff as well as the head teachers. The quality of data under PES was found to be of very. The special DCF was constructed in line with the objectives of the study which was helpful in maintaining the quality of the data under PES. The quality of the data under PES was maintained to a great extent due to the well versed field staff, computer staff of CMDR and the over all co-operation of the head teachers, BRC/CRC members and the officials of SSA unit. 1.9 Tabulation of Data After scrutiny of PES data tabulation was done at Centre for Multi-Disciplinary Development Research (CMDR) with the help of its well trained computer personnel by using the SPSS package. The tabulated data were sent to SSA division EMIS unit, Bangalore to get comparative data of DISE from SSA division. This process made the comparison more feasible. 1.10 Report writing and Analytical Tools The report is mainly concentrated to the comparison of PES and DISE data in respect of all the indicators of the schools surveyed. The report also includes attributes pertaining to the head teacher and the investigators about the training of the head teacher in connection with DISE implementation. Suggestions for improving the quality of DISE data have also been included. Simple deviation method was used to estimate the deviation between DISE and PES data. The overall deviation of data was calculated by using the following formula, i.e. [(d1+ d2+d3.+dx)/ (a+b+c+.+n)] x100 where d1,d2..dx stand for deviation of items of DISE data from PES (Post enumeration survey) data ignoring ± signs and a,b,c n denote the items of PES data. 6
C h a p t e r II DEVIATION BETWEEN DISE AND PES DATA 2.1 Dakshina Kannada District 2.1: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Category of Sample Schools LPS HPS District Deviatio PES DISE PES DISE Deviati PES DISE Dviatio n on n Dakshina Kannada 16 16 0 30 30 0 46 46 0 Dakshina Kannada LPS a) Number of schools as per DISE data 16 b) Number of schools as per PES data 16 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 HPS a) Number of schools as per DISE data 30 b) Number of schools as per PES data 30 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) number of schools as per DISE data 46 b) number of schools as per PES data 46 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 7
2.2: Location of sample schools Rural Urban District DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation Dakshina Kannada 39 39 0 7 7 0 46 46 0 Dakshina Kannada Rural a) Number of schools as per DISE data 39 b) Number of schools as per PES data 39 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 Urban a) Number of schools as per DISE data 7 b) Number of schools as per PES data 7 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) number of schools as per DISE data 46 b) number of schools as per PES data 46 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 8
2.3: Lowest class in the school 1st standard Districts LPS HPS DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation Dakshin Kannada 16 16 0 30 30 0 46 46 0 Dakshina Kannada LPS a) Number of schools as per DISE data 16 b) Number of schools as per PES data 16 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 HPS a) Number of schools as per DISE data 30 b) Number of schools as per PES data 30 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) number of schools as per DISE data 46 b) number of schools as per PES data 46 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 9
2.4: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Highest Class in the Schools Highest Class 2nd, 3rd &4th 5th & 6th 7th & 8th DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation LPS 1 1 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 16 16 0 HPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 1 1 0 15 15 0 30 30 0 46 46 0 Dakshina Kannada a) Number of schools as per DISE data 46 b) Number of schools as per PES data 46 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 2.5: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: School Management Education Dept. District DISE PES Deviation Dakshin Kannada 46 46 0 Dakshina Kannada Education Dept. a) Number of schools as per DISE data 46 b) Number of schools as per PES data 46 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 10
2.6: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Type of School Building DISE PES Deviation District Pucca Partially pucca Pucca Partially pucca Pucca Partially pucca Dakshina Kannada 43 3 46 43 3 46 0 0 0 Dakshina Kannada Pucca a) Number of schools as per DISE data 43 b) Number of schools as per PES data 43 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 Partially Pucca a) Number of schools as per DISE data 3 b) Number of schools as per PES data 3 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) number of schools as per DISE data 46 b) number of schools as per PES data 46 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 11
2.7: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Status of School Building Government District DISE PES Deviation Dakshina Kannada 46 46 0 Dakshin kannada Government a) number of schools as per DISE data 46 b) number of schools as per PES data 46 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 2.8: No of class rooms in the school DISE PES Deviation District No. of Class Rooms No. of Class Rooms No. of Class Rooms District 2 3 4 5 6 >6 2 3 4 5 6 >6 1 2 3 4 5 6 >6 Dakshina Kannada 7 7 2 12 5 13 46 7 7 2 12 5 13 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dakshin kannada a) number of schools as per DISE data 46 b) number of schools as per PES data 46 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 12
2.9: Teachers in position in sample schools-dise 2.9: Teachers in position in sample schools-pes LPS LPS Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 0 0 9 21 0 0 9 21 HPS HPS Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 12 10 34 148 12 10 34 148 Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 12 10 43 169 12 10 43 169 LPS Teacher (excl. HT) Teacher (excl. HT) Male Male a) Number of teachers as per DISE data 9 a) Number of teachers as per DISE data 34 b) Number of teachers as per PES data 9 b) Number of teachers as per PES data 34 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 Teacher (excl. HT) Teacher (excl. HT) Female Female a) Number of teachers as per DISE data 21 a) Number of teachers as per DISE data 148 b) Number of teachers as per PES data 21 b) Number of teachers as per PES data 148 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 HPS Head Teacher a) Number of teachers as per DISE data 234 Male b) Number of teachers as per PES data 234 a) Number of head teachers as per DISE data 12 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 b) Number of head teachers as per PES data 12 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 Female a) Number of head teachers as per DISE data 10 b) Number of head teachers as per PES data 10 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 13
2.10: Comparison of examination results between DISE and PES data Appeared Passed DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation Dakshina Kannada 3669 3477 7146 3669 3477 7146 0 0 0 3658 3468 7126 3658 3468 7126 0 0 0 Appeared a) Number of boys as per DISE data 3669 b) Number of boys as per PES data 3669 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) Number of girls as per DISE data 3477 b) Number of girls as per PES data 3477 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) number of students as per DISE data 7146 b) number of students as per PES data 7146 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 Passed a) Number of boys as per DISE data 3658 b) Number of boys as per PES data 3658 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) Number of girls as per DISE data 3468 b) Number of girls as per PES data 3468 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) number of students as per DISE data 7126 b) number of students as per PES data 7126 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 14
2.11: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Enrollment Enrolment Enrolment Deviation District DISE PES boys boys boys 3622 3499 7121 3622 3499 7121 0 0 0 Dakshin kannada a) Number of boys as per DISE data 3622 b) Number of boys as per PES data 3622 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) Number of girls as per DISE data 3499 b) Number of girls as per PES data 3499 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) number of students as per DISE data 7121 b) number of students as per PES data 7121 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 15
2.12 : Enrolment of children in the school DISE PES Deviation District SC ST SC ST SC ST Dakshin kannada 444 463 907 221 220 441 444 462 906 220 221 441 0 1 1 1 1 2 SC a) Number of boys as per DISE data 444 b) Number of boys as per PES data 444 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) Number of girls as per DISE data 463 b) Number of girls as per PES data 462 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 1 a) number of students as per DISE data 907 b) number of students as per PES data 906 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 1 ST a) Number of boys as per DISE data 221 b) Number of boys as per PES data 220 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 1 a) Number of girls as per DISE data 220 b) Number of girls as per PES data 221 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 1 a) number of students as per DISE data 441 b) number of students as per PES data 441 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 2 16
2.13: Enrolment of disability children DISE PES Deviation Dakshina Kannada Primary 8 5 13 8 5 13 0 0 0 Primary with upper primary 36 27 63 36 27 63 0 0 0 44 32 76 44 32 76 0 0 0 Dakshin kannada a) Number of boys as per DISE data 44 b) Number of boys as per PES data 44 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) Number of girls as per DISE data 32 b) Number of girls as per PES data 32 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) number of students as per DISE data 76 b) number of students as per PES data 76 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 17
2.14: Comparison of repeaters between DISE and PES Category of schools DISE PES Deviation Dakshina Kannada Primary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Primary with upper primary 21 10 31 21 10 31 0 0 0 21 10 31 21 10 31 0 0 0 Dakshin kannada a) Number of boys as per DISE data 21 b) Number of boys as per PES data 21 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) Number of girls as per DISE data 10 b) Number of girls as per PES data 10 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 a) number of students as per DISE data 31 b) number of students as per PES data 31 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 0 18
2.15: Incentive for text books: comparison between DISE and PES data DISE PES Deviation Dakshina Kannada Primary 318 324 642 314 329 643 4 5 9 Primary with upper primary 3183 3130 6313 3245 3151 6396 62 21 83 3501 3454 6955 3559 3480 7039 66 26 92 a) Number of boys as per DISE data 3501 b) Number of boys as per PES data 3559 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 66 d) % deviation of DISE data from PES data 2 e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data 98 a) Number of girls as per DISE data 3454 b) Number of girls as per PES data 3480 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 26 d) % deviation of DISE data from PES data 1 e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data 99 a) number of students as per DISE data 6955 b) number of students as per PES data 7039 c) Deviations between DISE and PES ignoring ± signs 92 d) % deviation of DISE data from PES data 1 e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data 99 19
2.16: Attendance of children in the schools Dakshin Kannada Attendance- -DISE -PES Deviation 3586 3463 7049 3586 3463 7049 0 0 0 Attendance-SC SC-DISE SC-PES Deviation 442 460 902 442 460 902 0 0 0 Attendance-ST ST-DISE ST-PES Deviation 219 220 439 219 220 439 0 0 0 Dakshin kannada Attendance- a) Quantitative Value of items as per DISE data sample size 7049 b) Quantitative Value of items as per PES data sample size 7049 c) Quantitative value of deviations ignoring ± signs 0 Attendance-SC a) Quantitative Value of items as per DISE data sample size 902 b) Quantitative Value of items as per PES data sample size 902 c) Quantitative value of deviations ignoring ± signs 0 Attendance-ST a) Quantitative Value of items as per DISE data sample size 439 b) Quantitative Value of items as per PES data sample size 439 c) Quantitative value of deviations ignoring ± signs 0 20
2.2. Chitradurga District 2.17: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Category of Sample Schools LPS HPS District Deviatio PES DISE PES DISE Deviati PES DISE Dviatio n on n Chitradurga 48 48 0 38 38 0 86 86 0 Chitradurga LPS a) No. of schools as per DISE data 48 b) No. of schools as per PES data 48 HPS a) No. of schools as per DISE data 38 b) No. of schools as per PES data 38 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 86 b) No. of schools as per PES data 86 21
2.18: Location of sample schools Rural Urban District DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation Chitradurga 78 78 0 8 8 0 86 86 0 Chitradurga Rural a) No. of schools as per DISE data 78 b) No. of schools as per PES data 78 Urban a) No. of schools as per DISE data 8 b) No. of schools as per PES data 8 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 86 b) No. of schools as per PES data 86 22
2.19: Lowest class in the school 1st standard Districts LPS HPS DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation Chitradurga 48 48 0 38 38 0 86 86 0 Chitradurga LPS a) No. of schools as per DISE data 48 b) No. of schools as per PES data 48 HPS a) No. of schools as per DISE data 38 b) No. of schools as per PES data 38 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 86 b) No. of schools as per PES data 86 23
2.20: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Highest Class in the Schools Highest Class 2nd, 3rd &4th 5th & 6th 7th & 8th DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation LPS 7 9 2 41 39 2 0 0 0 48 48 0 HPS 0 0 0 2 2 0 36 36 0 38 38 0 7 9 2 43 41 2 36 36 0 86 86 0 Chitradurga a) No. of schools as per DISE data 86 b) No. of schools as per PES data 86 2.21: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: School Management Education Dept. Education Dept. Devia DISE PES Deviation DISE PES DISE PES Deviation District tion Chtradurga 83 83 0 3 3 0 86 86 0 Chitradurga a) No. of schools as per DISE data 86 b) No. of schools as per PES data 86 24
2.22: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Type of School Building District Pucca DISE PES Deviation Partially pucca Pucca Partially pucca Pucca Partially pucca Chitradurga 70 16 86 71 15 86 1 1 2 Chitradurga Pucca a) No. of schools as per DISE data 70 b) No. of schools as per PES data 71 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 1 d) % deviation of DISE data from PES data 1 e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data in % 99 Partially Pucca a) No. of schools as per DISE data 16 b) No. of schools as per PES data 15 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 1 d) % deviation of DISE data from PES data 7 e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data in % 93 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 86 b) No. of schools as per PES data 86 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 2 d) % deviation of DISE data from PES data 2 e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data in % 98 25
2.23: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Status of School Building Private Rented Government DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation Chitradurga 4 4 0 3 3 0 79 79 0 86 86 0 Chitradurga Private a) No. of schools as per DISE data 4 b) No. of schools as per PES data 4 Rented a) No. of schools as per DISE data 3 b) No. of schools as per PES data 3 Government a) No. of schools as per DISE data 79 b) No. of schools as per PES data 79 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 86 b) No. of schools as per PES data 86 26
2.24: No of class rooms in the school DISE PES Deviation No. of Class Rooms No. of Class Rooms No. of Class Rooms District 1 2 3 4 5 6 >6 1 2 3 4 5 6 >6 1 2 3 4 5 6 >6 Chitradurga 14 27 10 6 9 6 14 86 14 27 10 6 8 7 14 86 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 Chitradurga a) No. of schools as per DISE data 86 b) No. of schools as per PES data 86 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 2 d) % deviation of DISE data from PES data 2 e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data in % 98 27
LPS HPS 2.25: Teachers in position in sample schools-dise 2.25: Teachers in position in sample schools-pes LPS Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 63 31 63 31 HPS Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 30 8 100 104 30 8 100 104 Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 30 8 163 135 30 8 163 135 LPS Teacher (excl. HT) Male Teacher (excl. HT) a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 63 Male b) No. of teachers as per PES data 63 a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 100 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 100 Teacher (excl. HT) Female a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 31 Teacher (excl. HT) b) No. of teachers as per PES data 31 Female a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 104 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 104 HPS Head Teacher Male a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 30 a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 336 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 30 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 336 Female a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 8 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 8 28
2.26: Comparison of examination results between DISE and PES data Appeared Passed DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation Chitradurga 4521 4806 9327 4521 4806 9327 0 0 0 4516 4798 9314 4516 4798 9314 0 0 0 Appeared Passed a) No. of boys as per DISE data sample size 4521 b) No. of boys as per PES data sample size 4521 a) No. of boys as per DISE data sample size 4516 b) No. of boys as per PES data sample size 4516 a) No. of girls as per DISE data sample size 4806 b) No. of girls as per PES data sample size 4806 a) No. of girls as per DISE data sample size 4798 b) No. of girls as per PES data sample size 4798 a) No. of students as per DISE data sample size 9327 b) No. of students as per PES data sample size 9327 a) No. of students as per DISE data sample size 9314 b) No. of students as per PES data sample size 9314 29
2.27: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Enrollment Enrolment Enrolment Deviation District DISE PES boys boys boys Chitradurga 4531 4868 9399 4529 4874 9403 2 6 8 Chitradurga a) No. of boys as per DISE data sample size 4531 b) No. of boys as per PES data sample size 4529 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 2 a) No. of girls as per DISE data sample size 4868 b) No. of girls as per PES data sample size 4874 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 6 a) No. of students as per DISE data sample size 9399 b) No. of students as per PES data sample size 9403 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 8 30
2.28 : Enrolment of children in the school DISE PES Deviation SC ST SC ST SC ST District Chitradurga 1153 1217 2370 1115 1149 2264 1157 1216 2373 1113 1146 2259 4 1 5 2 3 5 SC ST a) No. of boys as per DISE data sample size 1153 b) No. of boys as per PES data sample size 1157 a) No. of boys as per DISE data sample size 1115 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 4 b) No. of boys as per PES data sample size 1113 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 2 a) No. of girls as per DISE data sample size 1217 b) No. of girls as per PES data sample size 1216 a) No. of girls as per DISE data sample size 1149 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 1 b) No. of girls as per PES data sample size 1146 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 3 a) No. of students as per DISE data sample size 2370 b) No. of students as per PES data sample size 2373 a) No. of students as per DISE data sample size 2264 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 3 b) No. of students as per PES data sample size 2259 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 5 31
2.29: Enrolment of disability children DISE PES Deviation Chitradurga Primary 20 20 40 20 20 40 0 0 0 Primary with upper primary 105 56 161 105 56 161 0 0 0 125 76 201 125 76 201 0 0 0 Chitradurga a) No. of boys as per DISE data sample size 125 b) No. of boys as per PES data sample size 125 a) No. of girls as per DISE data sample size 76 b) No. of girls as per PES data sample size 76 a) No. of students as per DISE data sample size 201 b) No. of students as per PES data sample size 201 32
2.30: Comparison of repeaters between DISE and PES Category of schools DISE PES Deviation Chitradurga Primary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Primary with upper primary 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Chitradurga a) No. of boys as per DISE data sample size 2 b) No. of boys as per PES data sample size 2 a) No. of girls as per DISE data sample size 0 b) No. of girls as per PES data sample size 0 a) No. of students as per DISE data sample size 2 b) No. of students as per PES data sample size 2 33
2.31: Incentive for text books: comparison between DISE and PES data DISE PES Deviation Chitradurga Primary 770 916 1686 770 916 1686 0 0 0 Primary with upper primary 3192 3395 6587 3192 3395 6587 0 0 0 3962 4311 8273 3962 4311 8273 0 0 0 a) No. of boys as per DISE data sample size 3962 b) No. of boys as per PES data sample size 3962 a) No. of girls as per DISE data sample size 4311 b) No. of girls as per PES data sample size 4311 a) No. of students as per DISE data sample size 8273 b) No. of students as per PES data sample size 8273 34
2.32: Attendance of children in the schools Chitradurga Attendance- DISE PES Deviation 4468 4791 9259 4468 4791 9259 0 0 0 Attendance-SC DISE PES Deviation 1133 1202 2335 1133 1202 2335 0 0 0 Attendance-ST DISE PES Deviation 1078 1166 2244 1078 1166 2244 0 0 0 Chitradurga Attendance- a) No. of students as per DISE data sample size 9259 b) No. of students as per PES data sample size 9259 Attendance-SC a) No. of SC students as per DISE data sample size 2335 b) No. of SC students as per PES data sample size 2335 Attendance-ST a) No. of ST students as per DISE data sample size 2244 b) No. of ST students as per PES data sample size 2244 35
2.3 Gulbarga District 2.33: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Category of Sample Schools LPS HPS District PES DISE Deviation PES DISE Deviation PES DISE Dviation Gulbarga 58 58 0 70 70 0 128 128 0 Gulbarga LPS a) No. of schools as per DISE data 58 b) No. of schools as per PES data 58 HPS a) No. of schools as per DISE data 70 b) No. of schools as per PES data 70 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 128 b) No. of schools as per PES data 128 36
2.34: Location of sample schools Rural Urban District PES DISE Deviation PES DISE Deviation PES DISE Deviation Gulbarga 112 112 0 16 16 0 128 128 0 Gulbarga Rural a) No. of schools as per DISE data 112 b) No. of schools as per PES data 112 Urban a) No. of schools as per DISE data 16 b) No. of schools as per PES data 16 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 128 b) No. of schools as per PES data 128 37
2.35: Lowest class in the school 1st standard Districts LPS HPS DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation Gulbarga 58 58 0 70 70 0 128 128 0 Gulbarga LPS a) No. of schools as per DISE data 58 b) No. of schools as per PES data 58 HPS a) No. of schools as per DISE data 70 b) No. of schools as per PES data 70 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 128 b) No. of schools as per PES data 128 38
2.36: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Highest Class in the Schools Highest Class 1st 2nd, 3rd &4th 5th & 6th 7th & 8th DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation DISE PES Deviation LPS 1 1 0 14 14 0 43 43 0 0 0 0 58 58 0 HPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 62 62 0 70 70 0 1 1 0 14 14 0 51 51 0 62 62 0 128 128 0 Gulbarga a) No. of schools as per DISE data 128 b) No. of schools as per PES data 128 2.37: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: School Management Education Dept. Private Aided Deviat DISE PES DISE PES Devia District ion tion Gulbarga 122 122 0 6 6 0 Education Dept. a) No. of schools as per DISE data 122 b) No. of schools as per PES data 122 Private Aided a) No. of schools as per DISE data 6 b) No. of schools as per PES data 6 39
2.38: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Type of School Building District Pucca Partially pucca DISE PES Deviation Kuccha Pucca Partially pucca Kuccha Pucca Partially pucca Gulbarga 118 9 1 128 118 9 1 128 0 0 0 0 Pucca a) No. of schools as per DISE data 118 b) No. of schools as per PES data 118 Kuccha Partially Pucca a) No. of schools as per DISE data 9 b) No. of schools as per PES data 9 Kutcha a) No. of schools as per DISE data 1 b) No. of schools as per PES data 1 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 128 b) No. of schools as per PES data 128 40
2.39: Comparison of PES Data with DISE Data: Status of School Building Private Rented Government Deviation DISE PES DISE PES DISE PES DISE PES Gulbarga 8 8 4 4 116 116 0 0 Private a) No. of schools as per DISE data 8 b) No. of schools as per PES data 8 Rented a) No. of schools as per DISE data 4 b) No. of schools as per PES data 4 Government a) No. of schools as per DISE data 116 b) No. of schools as per PES data 116 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 128 b) No. of schools as per PES data 128 41
2.40: No of class rooms in the school DISE PES Deviation No. of Class Rooms No. of Class Rooms No. of Class Rooms District 1 2 3 4 5 6 >6 1 2 3 4 5 6 >6 1 2 3 4 5 6 >6 Gulbarga 12 26 20 15 11 8 36 128 12 25 21 15 11 8 36 128 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 a) No. of schools as per DISE data 128 b) No. of schools as per PES data 128 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 2 d) % deviation of DISE data from PES data 2 e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data in % 98 42
2.41: Teachers in position in sample schools-dise 2.: 41Teachers in position in sample schools-pes LPS LPS Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 0 0 79 60 0 0 79 60 HPS HPS Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 54 15 271 241 54 15 273 241 Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Head Teacher Teacher (excl. HT) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 54 15 350 301 54 15 352 301 LPS Teacher (excl. HT) Male Teacher (excl. HT) a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 79 Male b) No. of teachers as per PES data 79 a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 271 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 273 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 2 d) % deviation of DISE data from PES data 1 Teacher (excl. HT) e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data in 99 Female Teacher (excl. HT) a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 60 Female b) No. of teachers as per PES data 60 a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 241 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 241 HPS e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data in 100 Head Teacher Male a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 720 a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 54 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 722 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 54 c) Deviations between DISE & PES data ignoring ± signs 2 e) Precision level of DISE data with relation to PES data in 100 Female a) No. of teachers as per DISE data 15 b) No. of teachers as per PES data 15 43