TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2017 Distinction Designation Summary - ELA/Reading KRAHN EL ( ) - KLEIN ISD Campus Type: Elementary

Similar documents
Evaluation of Teach For America:

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

African American Success Initiative

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Northern Vance High School Athletic Director. Dr. Michael Applewhite. Until Filled

SPEAK UP 200 SCHOOLS 2009 PARTICIPATION

Closing the. Higher. Achievement. Education. Gap: Strategies. Ecosystems. from the Field

FY Matching Scholarship Grant Allocations by County Based on Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) Population 1

COURSE CATALOG & EDUCATIONAL PLANNING GUIDE SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT LAKE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

KANSAS SCHOOL FIRE DRILL LOG

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Daily Common Core Ela Warm Ups

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

College Entrance Testing:

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Instrumentation, Control & Automation Staffing. Maintenance Benchmarking Study

Transportation Improvement Program

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

Memo. All Campus Principals. Margarita Hernandez/ mth Assistant to Tom Gunnell, COO Operations Division Documents.

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

WELCOME JUNIORS SENIOR YEAR SCHEDULING

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Rural Education in Oregon

THE MEN BEHIND THE PULPIT (RICHMOND HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, YADKIN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION) - NCCF. November June 1901


Heritage High School Home of the Coyotes. Class of 2017 Registration for Senior Classes

Educational Resources. National Council or Teachers of English NCTE and Conference of English Leadership CEL

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Educational Attainment

Senior Parent Meeting What s next?

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Grade 5 + DIGITAL. EL Strategies. DOK 1-4 RTI Tiers 1-3. Flexible Supplemental K-8 ELA & Math Online & Print

New Hanover County Schools Announce the Results for the READY Assessments and Report the Highest Graduation Rate to Date

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

District Planning Advisory Council

TESTING. Who Must Take the TSI Assessment Exam? Who Does Not Have to Take the TSI Assessment Exam? When Must a Student Take the TSI Assessment Exam?

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Praxis Study Guide For 5086

Student Learning Objectives Overview for New Districts

Cardiovascular Sonography/Adult Echocardiography (Diploma)

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Tutor Coaching Study Research Team

PreAP Geometry. Ms. Patricia Winkler

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

NEW NCAA Division I Initial-Eligibility Academic Requirements

u Articulation and Transfer Best Practices

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

12 Banquete ISD. 13 Robert Driscoll Elementary School. 14 Bishop CISD Badger Den. 15 The People's Baptist Church. 16 London Middle/High School

Garland Independent School District Davis Elementary School Improvement Plan

Apps4VA at JMU. Student Projects Featuring VLDS Data. Dr. Chris Mayfield. Department of Computer Science James Madison University

MAGNET PROGRAM REVIEW. Authors : Anisa Rhea Ph.D., WCPSS Evaluation and Research Department Roger Regan Ph.D., WCPSS Magnet Programs ABSTRACT

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cynthia Dawn Martelli, Ed.D.

Physicians Medical Center (Texas Health Center for Diagnostics & Surgery Plano) Community Health Needs Assessment

Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says

Palo Alto College. What We Have Done

Creating an Online Test. **This document was revised for the use of Plano ISD teachers and staff.

All Hands on Deck! Engaging Faculty Voices to Rise Above the Storm!

MPA SKI BULLETIN (updated 11/9/17)

Do Graduate Student Teacher Training Courses Affect Placement Rates?

Eileen Bau CIE/USA-DFW 2014

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

UW RICHLAND. uw-richland richland.uwc.edu

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

WINSTON CHURCHILL HIGH SCHOOL. 9 th Grade Registration Information

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

Elementary Campus Improvement Plan: School Based Improvement Committee Skaggs Elementary. Principal: Jamey J. Allen

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

PEIMS Submission 1 list

State: Original. Status: Planned July 2015-June. State: Original. Status: Planned. July 2015-June. State: Original. Status: Planned.

Catalog Supplement Pasco Yakima A Learning Site of Pasco

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Transcription:

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - ELA/Reading Quartile Attendance Rate 96.8% Q2 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in ELA/Reading 30.0% Q1 Grade 3 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 46.0% Q1 Grade 4 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 41.0% Q1 Grade 4 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) 20.0% Q1 Grade 5 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 39.0% Q1 Grade 6 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English I Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English II Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: ELA AP/IB Examination Performance: ELA SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: ELA ACT Performance: ELA Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: ELA/Reading Total s for ELA/Reading 5 of 6 Distinction Campus Outcome: 5 of 6 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 5 of 6 = 83% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The attendance rate indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to ELA/reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 1 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Mathematics Quartile Attendance Rate 96.8% Q2 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in Mathematics 52.0% Q1 Grade 3 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 39.0% Q1 Grade 4 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 61.0% Q1 Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 41.0% Q1 Grade 6 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation EOC Algebra I Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: Mathematics AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: Mathematics Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Mathematics Total s for Mathematics 4 of 5 Distinction Campus Outcome: 4 of 5 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 4 of 5 = 80% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The attendance rate indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to ELA/reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 2 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Science Quartile Attendance Rate 96.8% Q2 Grade 5 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) 24.0% Q1 Grade 8 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC Biology Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: Science AP/IB Examination Performance: Science ACT Performance: Science Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Science Total s for Science 1 of 2 Distinction Campus Outcome: 1 of 2 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 1 of 2 = 50% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. The attendance rate indicator is not subject specific; therefore, it applies to ELA/reading, mathematics, science, and social studies. Consequently, this indicator cannot be the sole measure used by a campus to attain a distinction. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 3 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Social Studies This campus is not eligible for this Distinction Designation. See the 2017 Accountability Manual for more information. NOT ELIGIBLE TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 4 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Top 25% in Student Progress Campus Name District Name Index 2 1 FAYE WEBB EL (178904157) CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 61 KRAHN EL (101915113) KLEIN ISD 57 2 COLIN POWELL EL (057910123) GRAND PRAIRIE ISD 55 3 ARMAND BAYOU EL (084910111) CLEAR CREEK ISD 52 4 ROSE HAGGAR EL (043910130) PLANO ISD 52 5 CIMARRON EL (101914107) KATY ISD 49 6 FALCON PASS EL (084910124) CLEAR CREEK ISD 49 7 JAMES H ROSS EL (084910104) CLEAR CREEK ISD 49 8 LAKEVIEW EL (061914107) LITTLE ELM ISD 49 9 PALMER EL (079907121) FORT BEND ISD 49 10 BOONE EL (227901170) AUSTIN ISD 48 11 CESAR CHAVEZ EL (061914104) LITTLE ELM ISD 48 12 CURTIS EL (123910105) BEAUMONT ISD 48 13 TOM LEA JR EL (071902178) EL PASO ISD 48 14 WANKE EL (015915148) NORTHSIDE ISD 48 15 GATTIS EL (246909121) ROUND ROCK ISD 47 16 LETA HORN SMITH (043911105) PRINCETON ISD 47 17 REDLAND OAKS EL (015910128) NORTH EAST ISD 47 18 CROSS OAKS EL (061901125) DENTON ISD 46 19 CURINGTON EL (130901101) BOERNE ISD 46 20 HOWARD NORMAN EL (246906107) HUTTO ISD 46 21 MCNAIR EL (061901106) DENTON ISD 46 22 LIECK EL (015915225) NORTHSIDE ISD 45 23 TIMBERS EL (101913110) HUMBLE ISD 45 24 WEDGEWOOD EL (084910119) CLEAR CREEK ISD 45 25 BAY EL (084910105) CLEAR CREEK ISD 44 26 BUDA EL (105906106) HAYS CISD 44 27 CARPENTER ELEMENTARY (101908101) DEER PARK ISD 44 28 ELM GROVE EL (101913107) HUMBLE ISD 44 29 INDIAN CREEK EL (061902113) LEWISVILLE ISD 44 30 BENNETT EL (152907107) FRENSHIP ISD 43 31 FOSTER EL (101913104) HUMBLE ISD 43 32 HIGH COUNTRY ELEMENTARY (220918106) EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD 42 33 HOUSTON EL (061901102) DENTON ISD 41 34 CHRISTINE CAMACHO EL (246913125) LEANDER ISD 40 35 CLARK EL (101911123) GOOSE CREEK CISD 40 36 DOUBLE FILE TRAIL EL (246909119) ROUND ROCK ISD 39 37 NICHOLS SAWMILL EL (170906107) MAGNOLIA ISD 39 38 BRANSOM EL (126902108) BURLESON ISD 37 39 CORINTH EL (061912103) LAKE DALLAS ISD 36 40 JOE K BRYANT EL (043902101) ANNA ISD 34 Top 25% in Student Progress Target = Index 2 of 48 Blank values for an Index 2 occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10. Where Index 2 scores are identical the campuses are listed alphabetically by campus name. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 5 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Top 25% in Closing Performance Gaps Campus Name District Name Index 3 1 COLIN POWELL EL (057910123) GRAND PRAIRIE ISD 60 2 FAYE WEBB EL (178904157) CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 55 3 TOM LEA JR EL (071902178) EL PASO ISD 55 KRAHN EL (101915113) KLEIN ISD 54 4 CURTIS EL (123910105) BEAUMONT ISD 51 5 REDLAND OAKS EL (015910128) NORTH EAST ISD 51 6 CROSS OAKS EL (061901125) DENTON ISD 50 7 ELM GROVE EL (101913107) HUMBLE ISD 48 8 MCNAIR EL (061901106) DENTON ISD 48 9 BOONE EL (227901170) AUSTIN ISD 47 10 CARPENTER ELEMENTARY (101908101) DEER PARK ISD 47 11 CIMARRON EL (101914107) KATY ISD 47 12 HOWARD NORMAN EL (246906107) HUTTO ISD 47 13 INDIAN CREEK EL (061902113) LEWISVILLE ISD 46 14 NICHOLS SAWMILL EL (170906107) MAGNOLIA ISD 46 15 BAY EL (084910105) CLEAR CREEK ISD 45 16 LAKEVIEW EL (061914107) LITTLE ELM ISD 45 17 LETA HORN SMITH (043911105) PRINCETON ISD 45 18 TIMBERS EL (101913110) HUMBLE ISD 45 19 ARMAND BAYOU EL (084910111) CLEAR CREEK ISD 44 20 LIECK EL (015915225) NORTHSIDE ISD 44 21 WANKE EL (015915148) NORTHSIDE ISD 44 22 CESAR CHAVEZ EL (061914104) LITTLE ELM ISD 43 23 CLARK EL (101911123) GOOSE CREEK CISD 43 24 FALCON PASS EL (084910124) CLEAR CREEK ISD 43 25 FOSTER EL (101913104) HUMBLE ISD 43 26 HOUSTON EL (061901102) DENTON ISD 43 27 WEDGEWOOD EL (084910119) CLEAR CREEK ISD 43 28 BENNETT EL (152907107) FRENSHIP ISD 42 29 CORINTH EL (061912103) LAKE DALLAS ISD 41 30 GATTIS EL (246909121) ROUND ROCK ISD 41 31 BRANSOM EL (126902108) BURLESON ISD 40 32 CHRISTINE CAMACHO EL (246913125) LEANDER ISD 40 33 HIGH COUNTRY ELEMENTARY (220918106) EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD 40 34 JOE K BRYANT EL (043902101) ANNA ISD 40 35 CURINGTON EL (130901101) BOERNE ISD 39 36 JAMES H ROSS EL (084910104) CLEAR CREEK ISD 39 37 PALMER EL (079907121) FORT BEND ISD 39 38 BUDA EL (105906106) HAYS CISD 38 39 DOUBLE FILE TRAIL EL (246909119) ROUND ROCK ISD 36 40 ROSE HAGGAR EL (043910130) PLANO ISD 36 Top 25% in Closing Performance Gaps Target = Index 3 of 47 Blank values for an Index 3 occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10. Where Index 3 scores are identical the campuses are listed alphabetically by campus name. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 6 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary - Postsecondary Readiness Quartile Index 4 - Percent at STAAR Meets Grade Level Standard 67.0% Q1 Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Plan Rate* College-Ready Graduates Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Any Subject AP/IB Examination Performance: Any Subject SAT/ACT Participation SAT/ACT Performance CTE-Coherent Sequence Graduates Total s for Postsecondary Readiness 1 of 1 Evaluation of campus outcomes: 1 of 1 eligible indicators in Q1 (Top Quartile) 1 of 1 = 100% Distinction Target: Elementary = 50% or higher Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. *The four-year longitudinal graduation plan rate is determined by comparing the all students RHSP/DAP rate and the all students RHSP/DAP/FHSP-E/FHSP-DLA rate. The higher of the two rates is used for distinction designations. Refer to the Index 4 Data Table for details. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 7 of 8 August 15, 2017

2017 Distinction Designation Summary Numerator Denominator Quartile 1 Minimum Attendance Rate 96,201.0 99,406.0 96.8 96.9 Q2 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in ELA/Reading 73 241 30 27 Q1 Greater Than Expected Student Growth in Mathematics 126 241 52 30 Q1 Grade 3 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 52 112 46 39 Q1 Grade 3 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 44 112 39 33 Q1 Grade 4 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 54 132 41 32 Q1 Grade 4 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 80 132 61 32 Q1 Grade 4 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) 26 132 20 12 Q1 Grade 5 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) 41 105 39 37 Q1 Grade 5 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) 43 105 41 39 Q1 Grade 5 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) 25 105 24 23 Q1 Grade 6 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 6 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 7 Writing Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Reading Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Mathematics Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Science Performance (Masters Grade Level) Grade 8 Social Studies Performance (Masters Grade Level) Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation EOC Algebra I Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English I Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC English II Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC Biology Performance (Masters Grade Level) EOC U.S. History Performance (Masters Grade Level) AP/IB Examination Participation: ELA AP/IB Examination Participation: Mathematics AP/IB Examination Participation: Science AP/IB Examination Participation: Social Studies AP/IB Examination Performance: ELA AP/IB Examination Performance: Mathematics AP/IB Examination Performance: Science AP/IB Examination Performance: Social Studies AP/IB Examination Performance: Any Subject SAT/ACT Participation SAT/ACT Performance SAT Performance: ELA SAT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: ELA ACT Performance: Mathematics ACT Performance: Science Index 4 - Percent at STAAR Meets Grade Level Standard 228 338 67.0 52.0 Q1 Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate Four-Year Longitudinal Graduation Plan Rate* College-Ready Graduates Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: ELA/Reading Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Mathematics Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Science Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Social Studies Advanced/Dual-Credit Course Completion Rate: Any Subject CTE-Coherent Sequence Graduates Quartile Blank values for an indicator score occur if the indicator is not applicable to that campus or does not meet the minimum size of 10 students. Blank values for a quartile occur if there are fewer than 20 campuses in the campus comparison group for each qualifying indicator. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this indicator. *The four-year longitudinal graduation plan rate is determined by comparing the all students RHSP/DAP rate and the all students RHSP/DAP/FHSP-E/FHSP-DLArate. The higher of the two rates is used for distinction designations. Refer to the Index 4 Data Table for details. TEA Academics Performance Reporting Page 8 of 8 August 15, 2017