Japanese (2008) Sample assessment instrument. Speaking

Similar documents
Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

One Stop Shop For Educators

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

The Use of Drama and Dramatic Activities in English Language Teaching

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Curriculum MYP. Class: MYP1 Subject: French Teacher: Chiara Lanciano Phase: 1

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Teachers Guide Chair Study

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Sign languages and the Common European Framework of References for Languages

Creating Travel Advice

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Language Center. Course Catalog

Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

EQuIP Review Feedback

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Danielle Dodge and Paula Barnick first

Kindergarten Lessons for Unit 7: On The Move Me on the Map By Joan Sweeney

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Language Acquisition Chart

Vicente Amado Antonio Nariño HH. Corazonistas and Tabora School

10 Tips For Using Your Ipad as An AAC Device. A practical guide for parents and professionals

Jazz Dance. Module Descriptor.

EXAMPLES OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCES AT CEF LEVELS A2 TO C2. (Taken from Cambridge ESOL s Main Suite exams)

EMC Publishing s C est à toi! Level 3, 2 nd edition Correlated to the Oregon World Language Content Standards

ESL Curriculum and Assessment

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Conversation Task: The Environment Concerns Us All

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Lower and Upper Secondary

OFFICE OF COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

Public Speaking Rubric

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Copyright Corwin 2015

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions

Pronunciation: Student self-assessment: Based on the Standards, Topics and Key Concepts and Structures listed here, students should ask themselves...

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - WRITING THIRD GRADE FIFTH GRADE

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Arabic. Victorian Certificate of Education Study Design. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority 2004

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Timeline. Recommendations

ENG 111 Achievement Requirements Fall Semester 2007 MWF 10:30-11: OLSC

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Transcription:

Japanese (2008) Sample assessment instrument Speaking October 2009

Purposes of assessment 1 The purposes of assessment are to: promote, assist and improve student learning inform programs of teaching and learning provide information for those people students, parents, teachers who need to know about the progress and achievements of individual students to help them achieve to the best of their abilities provide information for the issuing of certificates of achievement provide information to those people who need to know how well groups of students are achieving (school authorities, the State Minister for Education and Training and the Arts, the Federal Minister for Education). It is common practice to label assessment as being formative, diagnostic or summative, according to the major purpose of the assessment. The major purpose of formative assessment is to help students attain higher levels of performance. The major purpose of diagnostic assessment is to determine the nature of students learning, and then provide the appropriate feedback or intervention. The major purpose of summative assessment is to indicate the achievement status or standards achieved by students at a particular point in their schooling. It is geared towards reporting and certification. Syllabus requirements Teachers should ensure that assessment instruments are consistent with the requirements, techniques and conditions of the Japanese syllabus and the implementation year 2008. Assessment instruments 2 High-quality assessment instruments 3 : have construct validity (the instruments actually assess what they were designed to assess) have face validity (they appear to assess what you believe they are intended to assess) give students clear and definite instructions are written in language suited to the reading capabilities of the students for whom the instruments are intended are clearly presented through appropriate choice of layout, cues, visual design, format and choice of words are used under clear, definite and specified conditions that are appropriate for all the students whose achievements are being assessed have clear criteria for making judgments about achievements (these criteria are shared with students before they are assessed) are used under conditions that allow optimal participation for all are inclusive of students diverse backgrounds allow students to demonstrate the breadth and depth of their achievements only involve the reproduction of gender, socioeconomic, ethnic or other cultural factors if careful consideration has determined that such reproduction is necessary. 1 QSA 2008, P 12 Assessment Policy, p. 2. 2 Assessment instruments are the actual tools used by schools and the QSA to gather information about student achievement, for example, recorded observation of a game of volleyball, write-up of a field trip to the local water catchment and storage area, a test of number facts, the Senior External Examination in Chinese, the 2006 QCS Test, the 2008 Year 4 English comparable assessment task. 3 QSA 2008, P 12 Assessment Policy, pp. 2 3. 2 Japanese (2008)

Japanese (2008) Sample assessment instrument Speaking Compiled by the Queensland Studies Authority October 2009 About this assessment instrument This sample demonstrates: coverage of the general objectives relative to the stage of the four-semester course of study assessment of the dimensions of Conveying meaning in the macroskill of Speaking spontaneous and flexible language use for a particular purpose and audience. Sample assessment instrument Speaking 3

Designing assessment instruments To ensure that appropriate opportunities to demonstrate the syllabus criteria and standards are provided, teachers should design assessment instruments that cover the dimensions and standard descriptors across a range of topics and text types. Designing assessment instruments Speaking The aspects to be addressed are: range cohesive devices register pronunciation meaning conversation non-verbal features. Sample assessment instrument The following sample assessment instrument provides opportunities for students to demonstrate: a link between learning and assessment information presented in the student response is not only relevant to the task but also reflects language and structures acquired during the course of study and, in particular, while studying the current topic or unit of work authentic language use spontaneous language ability the ability to initiate and sustain conversation a wide range of vocabulary and structures an ability to modify register to suit particular situations register should change as students move from the more formal parts of the task (the speech) to the less formal (the conversation). 4 Japanese (2008)

Scenario A group of Japanese students are coming to visit your school. You have been asked to present a welcome speech. The purpose for the and the intended audience are clearly identified. Task You should prepare a welcome speech that includes: a formal self-introduction a formal welcome to your school a brief discussion of what the students should expect during their stay including: any particular information about your school that the students may need to know in order to participate on a day-to-day basis relevant examples from your own experience to illustrate your points. There will be questions at the end of your talk, so be prepared to respond as best you can and to help the students as much as possible. The assessment task is clearly identified. The language used is clear and accessible to students. The amount of scaffolding provided will depend on the juncture of the course of study and the ability of the cohort. It might be appropriate to remove these dot points for a Year 12 cohort. A composite class could use one assessment task: the Year 11 task might have more scaffolding than the Year 12 task, depending on the ability of each particular cohort to create and respond spontaneously in a communicative context. Conditions You have one night to prepare your speech. You may have palm cards but only in point form. Your speech must be a minimum of 3 minutes in length. Your teacher will take on the role of a visiting student. Questions with the teacher will be outside the classroom and will be recorded. You will not be allowed to have any notes for the question section, which will be 3 minutes in length. The speech part of the task addresses a variety of descriptors but does not allow for the demonstration of unrehearsed language use. This question part of the task allows students to demonstrate flexibility, conversational routines, ability to initiate conversation and coherence. Sample assessment instrument Speaking 5

Task Specific Criteria and Standards for Conveying meaning (Speaking) Standard A Standard B Standard C Standard D Standard E a wide range of vocabulary and grammar is used effectively, with few errors a range of vocabulary and grammar is used effectively, although with some errors a range of familiar vocabulary and grammar is used, although errors are evident some familiar vocabulary and grammar is used, although frequent errors are made responses may be single words or short, well-rehearsed phrases, using familiar vocabulary a range of cohesive devices is used to express connected thoughts and ideas register is appropriate to the situation Selected cohesive devices are used to connect familiar thoughts and ideas register is usually appropriate to the situation basic cohesive devices are used to connect simple ideas some simple linking words Opportunities are used, but for student responses the meaning as a that may be matched to these whole descriptors is fragmented will be provided in both the speech and question sections of the assessment task. pronunciation, intonation, rhythm and stress are acceptable to a background speaker pronunciation, intonation, rhythm and stress are acceptable to a background speaker pronunciation may be affected by first language but is comprehensible by a background speaker pronunciation hinders pronunciation hinders ideas, information and meaning are communicated clearly and effectively, although some errors may occur in complex language conversation is initiated and sustained demonstrates flexibility, coherence, spontaneity and relevance to the context ideas, information and meaning are usually communicated clearly, although errors may occur in complex language conversation is generally sustained demonstrates flexibility when using familiar language responses are relevant to the context, although they may be hesitant where a variety of structures is used, the essential meaning is clear, although there may be frequent errors relies on prompts and cues responses are hesitant, repetitive and formulaic but relevant to the context there is sufficient accuracy to enable some details to be understood some simple meanings are conveyed Opportunities for student responses that may be matched to these descriptors will be provided in both the speech and relies question sections of heavily on prompts the assessment task. and cues responses are hesitant, repetitive and rehearsed appropriate pause fillers and nonverbal features are used where required some appropriate pause fillers and nonverbal features are used some nonverbal features are used some nonverbal features are used 6 Japanese (2008)