Georgia Presidential Election and Issues Poll 5/16/16. Fox 5 Atlanta

Similar documents
Opinion on Private Garbage Collection in Scarborough Mixed

Shelters Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Dana Chisnell, UsabilityWorks Ethan Newby, Newby Research (consultant on statistics) Sharon Laskowski, NIST Svetlana Lowry, NIST

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

A Diverse Student Body

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Cooper Upper Elementary School

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

APPENDIX 2: TOPLINE QUESTIONNAIRE

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Standards, Accountability and Flexibility: Americans Speak on No Child Left Behind Reauthorization. soeak

SUMMARY REPORT MONROE COUNTY, OH OFFICIAL RESULTS PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 6, 2012 RUN DATE:03/20/12 11:03 AM STATISTICS REPORT-EL45 PAGE 001

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Camas School levy passes! 69% approval! Crump! Truz! GOP homies tussle for Camas primary votes! Trump trumps with 42%, vs. 24% for Cruz!

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

Simple Random Sample (SRS) & Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: A Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: Systematic Sample Best Used When

46 Children s Defense Fund

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Humanitas A. San Fernando High School. Smaller Learning Community Plan. Azucena Hernandez, Redesign Team. Bob Stromoski, Redesign Team

Idaho Public Schools

Handouts and Resources

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Academic Choice and Information Search on the Web 2016

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

Networks and the Diffusion of Cutting-Edge Teaching and Learning Knowledge in Sociology


The First Annual Survey of the Community

Emergency Medical Technician Course Application

Application for Postgraduate Studies (Research)

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Junior State of America JSA. Handbook

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

STT 231 Test 1. Fill in the Letter of Your Choice to Each Question in the Scantron. Each question is worth 2 point.

Arden Middle Secondary Main Report

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Creating the Student Platform Fall 2008

Staff Briefing WHY IS IT IMPORTANT FOR STAFF TO PROMOTE THE NSS? WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO COMPLETE THE NSS? WHICH STUDENTS SHOULD I COMMUNICATE WITH?

Algebra 2- Semester 2 Review

Application for Fellowship Theme Year Sephardic Identities, Medieval and Early Modern. Instructions and Checklist

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Reading Comprehension Lesson Plan

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

John F. Kennedy Middle School

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Algebra Nation and Computer Science for MS Initiatives. Marla Davis, Ph.D. NBCT Office of Secondary Education

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Adver sing 2012 Graduate Survey

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Long Beach Unified School District

CONDUCTING SURVEYS. Everyone Is Doing It. Overview. What Is a Survey?

FACT: FACT: The National Coalition for Public Education. Debunking Myths About the DC Voucher Program

Outcome 1: Students analyze governmental institutions, political behavior, civic engagement, and their political and philosophical foundations.

Mathacle PSet Stats, Concepts in Statistics and Probability Level Number Name: Date:

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

MEDIA LAW AND ETHICS: COMM 3404 Learn to Think-Think to Learn Monday 6:00-8:45 p.m. Smith Lab 2150 Off: , Cell:

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

HiSET TESTING ACCOMMODATIONS REQUEST FORM Part I Applicant Information


ESIC Advt. No. 06/2017, dated WALK IN INTERVIEW ON

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Buffalo School Board Governance

African American Male Achievement Update

Financing Education In Minnesota

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Transcription:

Sponsor(s) Fox 5 Atlanta Target Population Georgia; likely presidential election voters Sampling Method Blended sample; mixed mode: Likely voters were selected at random from a list of registered voters. Only voters determined likely to vote in the 2016 presidential election were included in the sample. Landline: registered voters were contacted on the evening of May 15 th, 2016 using an interactive voice response system. Mobile: registered voters were contacted on the evening of May 15 th, 2016 on their mobile devices. Respondents answered an identical survey in visual form. Weighting One question served as a selection variable. Respondents were asked whether they intend to vote in the November election; only responses indicating definitely were included in the final data. The poll was weighted for age, race, gender, and political affiliation using propensity scores. Weighting benchmarks were determined using a combination of general election voter turnout, external analysis and internal projections. Total Number of Respondents 587 (weighted) Margin of Error ±4.0% (95% confidence)

1) If the 2016 election to determine the next President of the United States were held today and your choices were: Democrat Hillary Clinton; Republican Donald Trump; and a Libertarian or Independent candidate, for whom would you vote? a) Hillary Clinton b) Donald Trump c) Libertarian or Independent candidate d) Undecided Horse Clinton 240 40.9 Trump 259 44.1 Lib / Ind 60 10.2 Undecided 28 4.8 2) If Donald Trump were to select former House of Representatives Speaker and Georgia Representative Newt as his running mate, how would this affect your choice for President? a) I would be more likely to vote for Donald Trump. b) I would be less likely to vote for Donald Trump. c) This decision would not affect my choice. d) I am undecided. More likely 158 27.0 Less likely 117 19.9 No effect 278 47.3 Undecided 34 5.8

1) What is your opinion of the Obama administration s directive that students in public schools should be allowed to use the restroom and other public facilities according to how they identify their own gender, regardless of their gender as identified at birth? a) approve b) approve c) Neutral d) disapprove e) disapprove f) Undecided approve 124 21.2 approve 54 9.1 Neutral 58 9.9 disapprove 59 10.0 disapprove 276 47.1 Undecided 16 2.7 2) Which of the following statements best describes your opinion of the overall national discussion with regard to public restroom policies for transgendered individuals? a) I believe that individuals should be free to use whichever public facility with which they best identify. b) I believe that individuals should use the public facilities according to their gender as identified at birth. c) I do not consider this to be an issue requiring government action or public intervention. d) I am undecided or have no opinion. Identity 143 24.3 Birth 279 47.5 No policy 136 23.1 Undecided 30 5.1

3) What is your age? a) 18-29 b) 30-44 c) 45-64 d) 65+ Georgia Presidential Election and Issues Poll 18-29 70 12.0 30-44 152 25.9 45-64 247 42.1 65+ 117 20.0 4) What is your race/ethnicity? a) White b) African-American c) Hispanic or Latino d) Other White 387 65.9 African - American 177 30.1 Hispanic / Latino 12 2.0 Other 12 2.0 5) What is your gender? a) Male b) Female Male 264 44.9 Female 324 55.1

6) With which political party do you identify? a) Republican b) Democrat c) Independent Georgia Presidential Election and Issues Poll Republican 253 43.0 Democrat 217 37.0 Independent 117 20.0 7) Collection Mode a) Landline b) Mobile Landline 460 78.3 Mobile 127 21.7

Horse Clinton Trump Lib / Ind Undecided Horse % % % % Clinton 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Trump 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Lib / Ind 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Undecided 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% More likely 8.4% 47.6% 17.4% 16.1% Less likely 38.6% 4.3% 15.1% 14.0% No effect 46.3% 44.7% 64.9% 43.1% Undecided 6.7% 3.4% 2.7% 26.8% approve 39.1% 6.2% 8.2% 34.7% approve 12.3% 5.7% 10.6% 10.2% Neutral 15.7% 6.8% 4.0% 2.4% disapprove 10.7% 8.2% 17.8% 4.3% disapprove 17.3% 72.1% 57.9% 48.4% Undecided 5.0% 1.1% 1.5% 0.0% Identity 47.7% 4.7% 18.4% 17.2% Birth 28.1% 66.6% 38.2% 58.4% No policy 16.6% 25.0% 41.6% 22.0% Undecided 7.6% 3.7% 1.9% 2.4% 18-29 14.0% 11.4% 3.6% 18.0% 30-44 20.4% 24.5% 50.0% 34.7% 45-64 45.3% 41.3% 37.9% 30.9% 65+ 20.2% 22.8% 8.6% 16.4% White 41.0% 85.9% 81.2% 61.9% African - American 52.7% 11.6% 18.3% 32.9% Hispanic / Latino 4.1%.7% 0.0% 0.0% Other 2.2% 1.9%.5% 5.2% Male 40.3% 45.1% 66.8% 35.2% Female 59.7% 54.9% 33.2% 64.8% Republican 12.7% 70.3% 48.1% 39.4% Democrat 74.9% 5.5% 18.2% 43.7% Independent 12.4% 24.1% 33.7% 16.9% Landline 80.9% 80.1% 68.2% 61.5% Mobile 19.1% 19.9% 31.8% 38.5%

More likely Less likely No effect Undecided Horse % % % % Clinton 12.7% 79.3% 40.0% 47.2% Trump 77.8% 9.6% 41.6% 25.9% Lib / Ind 6.6% 7.7% 14.0% 4.8% Undecided 2.9% 3.4% 4.4% 22.1% More likely 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Less likely 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% No effect 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Undecided 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% approve 3.8% 47.5% 20.7% 16.0% approve 11.8% 14.2% 6.2% 2.8% Neutral 8.6% 12.9% 10.0% 5.8% disapprove 10.6% 10.8% 9.0% 12.2% disapprove 61.7% 14.0% 52.7% 46.4% Undecided 3.5%.6% 1.3% 16.7% Identity 8.7% 50.4% 23.1% 16.0% Birth 64.4% 25.3% 47.6% 44.5% No policy 24.7% 21.3% 23.7% 17.4% Undecided 2.2% 2.9% 5.5% 22.0% 18-29 9.5% 10.8% 14.6% 6.4% 30-44 18.6% 15.9% 36.4% 9.9% 45-64 45.8% 52.1% 35.5% 44.3% 65+ 26.2% 21.3% 13.5% 39.5% White 84.0% 47.0% 65.3% 51.8% African - American 13.5% 46.0% 30.7% 47.8% Hispanic / Latino 1.3% 2.9% 2.2% 0.0% Other 1.2% 4.1% 1.8%.4% Male 48.9% 42.8% 46.3% 22.0% Female 51.1% 57.2% 53.7% 78.0% Republican 66.7% 12.0% 44.7% 25.5% Democrat 8.0% 69.8% 37.0% 59.6% Independent 25.3% 18.2% 18.3% 14.9% Landline 90.0% 98.4% 61.7% 90.1% Mobile 10.0% 1.6% 38.3% 9.9%

Horse approve approve Neutral disapprove disapprove Undecided % % % % % % Clinton 75.4% 55.0% 64.6% 43.7% 15.0% 76.7% Trump 12.8% 27.7% 30.1% 36.0% 67.5% 17.7% Lib / Ind 4.0% 11.9% 4.1% 18.2% 12.6% 5.6% Undecided 7.9% 5.4% 1.1% 2.1% 4.9% 0.0% More likely 4.8% 34.9% 23.4% 28.6% 35.3% 35.3% Less likely 44.6% 31.0% 25.7% 21.5% 5.9% 4.3% No effect 46.2% 32.3% 47.5% 42.8% 53.0% 24.0% Undecided 4.4% 1.8% 3.4% 7.1% 5.7% 36.5% approve 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% approve 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Neutral 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% disapprove 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% disapprove 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Undecided 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Identity 82.9% 34.6% 16.2% 12.1%.4% 21.3% Birth 7.2% 33.9% 8.1% 50.4% 76.5% 40.3% No policy 8.9% 25.0% 57.2% 28.7% 21.0% 19.8% Undecided 1.1% 6.4% 18.5% 8.9% 2.2% 18.7% 18-29 19.5% 19.4% 8.4% 12.0% 7.9% 11.8% 30-44 26.4% 28.0% 13.5% 20.5% 29.8% 14.0% 45-64 32.4% 31.5% 56.0% 43.7% 45.7% 32.6% 65+ 21.6% 21.1% 22.0% 23.8% 16.6% 41.7% White 50.2% 53.3% 45.2% 55.7% 83.2% 43.7% African - American 44.1% 42.9% 45.1% 44.0% 13.8% 54.5% Hispanic / Latino 2.9% 2.2% 6.2% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Other 2.9% 1.5% 3.5%.3% 1.8% 1.8% Male 42.9% 54.6% 35.5% 35.4% 48.6% 32.9% Female 57.1% 45.4% 64.5% 64.6% 51.4% 67.1% Republican 9.9% 32.4% 23.7% 23.4% 69.4% 21.5% Democrat 75.2% 45.2% 58.1% 50.0% 9.6% 63.1% Independent 14.9% 22.4% 18.3% 26.6% 21.0% 15.5% Landline 76.6% 76.0% 79.2% 75.9% 79.3% 88.2% Mobile 23.4% 24.0% 20.8% 24.1% 20.7% 11.8%

Identity Birth No policy Undecided Horse % % % % Clinton 80.4% 24.1% 29.4% 61.4% Trump 8.5% 61.8% 47.6% 32.6% Lib / Ind 7.7% 8.2% 18.4% 3.8% Undecided 3.4% 5.9% 4.6% 2.2% More likely 9.7% 36.5% 28.8% 11.5% Less likely 41.3% 10.6% 18.4% 11.4% No effect 45.1% 47.4% 48.5% 51.8% Undecided 3.8% 5.4% 4.4% 25.2% approve 72.3% 3.2% 8.1% 4.5% approve 13.0% 6.5% 9.9% 11.6% Neutral 6.6% 1.7% 24.6% 36.3% disapprove 5.0% 10.6% 12.4% 17.5% disapprove.7% 75.7% 42.7% 20.3% Undecided 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 9.8% Identity 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Birth 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% No policy 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Undecided 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 18-29 17.8% 11.4% 6.1% 16.5% 30-44 25.8% 25.4% 32.0% 3.5% 45-64 35.4% 45.4% 43.2% 37.9% 65+ 20.9% 17.8% 18.7% 42.0% White 48.1% 77.3% 69.9% 25.8% African - American 47.5% 19.7% 24.5% 70.2% Hispanic / Latino 1.6% 1.5% 3.7% 0.0% Other 2.8% 1.6% 1.8% 4.0% Male 46.0% 44.2% 50.2% 21.9% Female 54.0% 55.8% 49.8% 78.1% Republican 9.0% 66.2% 38.2% 10.0% Democrat 78.7% 16.8% 25.8% 77.8% Independent 12.3% 17.0% 35.9% 12.2% Landline 74.5% 81.1% 76.2% 79.9% Mobile 25.5% 18.9% 23.8% 20.1%

18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Horse % % % % Clinton 47.8% 32.2% 44.0% 41.4% Trump 42.0% 41.7% 43.2% 50.3% Lib / Ind 3.0% 19.7% 9.2% 4.4% Undecided 7.2% 6.4% 3.5% 3.9% More likely 21.4% 19.3% 29.3% 35.3% Less likely 17.9% 12.2% 24.6% 21.2% No effect 57.6% 66.3% 39.9% 32.1% Undecided 3.1% 2.2% 6.1% 11.5% approve 34.5% 21.6% 16.3% 22.9% approve 14.8% 9.8% 6.8% 9.6% Neutral 7.0% 5.2% 13.2% 10.9% disapprove 10.0% 7.9% 10.4% 11.9% disapprove 31.1% 54.0% 51.2% 39.0% Undecided 2.6% 1.4% 2.1% 5.5% Identity 36.1% 24.2% 20.4% 25.4% Birth 45.2% 46.6% 51.3% 42.3% No policy 11.8% 28.5% 23.8% 21.6% Undecided 7.0%.7% 4.6% 10.6% 18-29 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30-44 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 45-64 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 65+ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% White 45.1% 66.5% 68.6% 71.9% African - American 46.3% 30.5% 27.0% 26.5% Hispanic / Latino 5.1%.9% 2.4%.6% Other 3.5% 2.1% 2.1% 1.0% Male 47.1% 48.8% 45.8% 36.6% Female 52.9% 51.2% 54.2% 63.4% Republican 43.4% 41.8% 41.5% 47.5% Democrat 42.1% 29.5% 40.5% 36.4% Independent 14.6% 28.7% 18.0% 16.1% Landline 34.4% 48.1% 99.2% 100.0% Mobile 65.6% 51.9%.8% 0.0%

White African - American Hispanic / Latino Other Horse % % % % Clinton 25.4% 71.6% 85.4% 44.5% Trump 57.5% 17.0% 14.6% 40.5% Lib / Ind 12.6% 6.2% 0.0% 2.7% Undecided 4.5% 5.2% 0.0% 12.3% More likely 34.4% 12.1% 17.9% 15.7% Less likely 14.2% 30.4% 29.3% 40.1% No effect 46.9% 48.3% 52.8% 43.0% Undecided 4.6% 9.2% 0.0% 1.2% approve 16.1% 31.0% 31.0% 30.1% approve 7.4% 13.0% 10.4% 6.5% Neutral 6.8% 14.9% 31.6% 17.1% disapprove 8.5% 14.6% 0.0% 1.4% disapprove 59.4% 21.6% 26.9% 42.6% Undecided 1.8% 4.8% 0.0% 2.4% Identity 17.7% 38.3% 20.3% 33.1% Birth 55.8% 31.1% 35.8% 36.3% No policy 24.5% 18.8% 43.9% 20.6% Undecided 2.0% 11.8% 0.0% 10.0% 18-29 8.2% 18.4% 31.0% 20.7% 30-44 26.2% 26.3% 12.3% 26.7% 45-64 43.8% 37.7% 50.3% 43.0% 65+ 21.8% 17.6% 6.3% 9.7% White 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% African - American 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic / Latino 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Male 49.7% 34.8% 34.4% 48.9% Female 50.3% 65.2% 65.6% 51.1% Republican 59.1% 10.3% 26.9% 22.1% Democrat 16.9% 78.8% 59.5% 48.5% Independent 24.0% 10.9% 13.5% 29.4% Landline 81.6% 71.1% 75.6% 80.8% Mobile 18.4% 28.9% 24.4% 19.2%

Horse Male Female % % Clinton 36.7% 44.3% Trump 44.3% 43.9% Lib / Ind 15.2% 6.2% Undecided 3.8% 5.6% More likely 29.4% 25.0% Less likely 19.0% 20.6% No effect 48.8% 46.1% Undecided 2.8% 8.2% approve 20.2% 22.0% approve 11.1% 7.5% Neutral 7.9% 11.6% disapprove 7.9% 11.7% disapprove 51.0% 43.9% Undecided 2.0% 3.2% Identity 24.9% 23.8% Birth 46.8% 48.2% No policy 25.9% 20.9% Undecided 2.5% 7.2% 18-29 12.6% 11.5% 30-44 28.2% 24.1% 45-64 42.9% 41.4% 65+ 16.3% 23.0% White 73.0% 60.1% African - American 23.3% 35.6% Hispanic / Latino 1.5% 2.3% Other 2.2% 1.9% Male 100.0% 0.0% Female 0.0% 100.0% Republican 44.7% 41.6% Democrat 27.5% 44.8% Independent 27.8% 13.6% Landline 77.6% 78.9% Mobile 22.4% 21.1%

Republican Democrat Independent Horse % % % Clinton 12.1% 82.8% 25.4% Trump 72.1% 6.6% 53.3% Lib / Ind 11.4% 5.0% 17.2% Undecided 4.4% 5.7% 4.1% More likely 41.9% 5.8% 34.1% Less likely 5.5% 37.5% 18.1% No effect 49.2% 47.3% 43.4% Undecided 3.4% 9.3% 4.3% approve 4.9% 43.0% 15.8% approve 6.9% 11.1% 10.2% Neutral 5.5% 15.6% 9.1% disapprove 5.4% 13.5% 13.3% disapprove 76.0% 12.2% 49.4% Undecided 1.3% 4.5% 2.1% Identity 5.1% 51.6% 14.9% Birth 73.2% 21.6% 40.4% No policy 20.6% 16.1% 41.6% Undecided 1.2% 10.6% 3.1% 18-29 12.1% 13.6% 8.7% 30-44 25.2% 20.7% 37.2% 45-64 40.6% 46.0% 38.0% 65+ 22.1% 19.7% 16.1% White 90.5% 30.1% 79.3% African - American 7.2% 64.1% 16.4% Hispanic / Latino 1.2% 3.2% 1.3% Other 1.0% 2.7% 3.0% Male 46.7% 33.3% 62.5% Female 53.3% 66.7% 37.5% Republican 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Democrat 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Independent 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Landline 81.7% 77.5% 72.5% Mobile 18.3% 22.5% 27.5%

Horse Landline Mobile % % Clinton 42.2% 36.0% Trump 45.1% 40.5% Lib / Ind 8.9% 15.0% Undecided 3.8% 8.5% More likely 31.0% 12.4% Less likely 25.0% 1.5% No effect 37.3% 83.5% Undecided 6.7% 2.6% approve 20.7% 22.9% approve 8.9% 10.1% Neutral 10.1% 9.5% disapprove 9.7% 11.1% disapprove 47.7% 44.9% Undecided 3.0% 1.4% Identity 23.1% 28.6% Birth 49.2% 41.4% No policy 22.5% 25.3% Undecided 5.2% 4.7% 18-29 5.3% 36.3% 30-44 15.9% 62.1% 45-64 53.3% 1.6% 65+ 25.5% 0.0% White 68.7% 55.8% African - American 27.3% 40.2% Hispanic / Latino 1.9% 2.2% Other 2.1% 1.8% Male 44.5% 46.4% Female 55.5% 53.6% Republican 44.9% 36.3% Democrat 36.6% 38.4% Independent 18.5% 25.3% Landline 100.0% 0.0% Mobile 0.0% 100.0%