RtI Criteria for ELA:

Similar documents
Academic Intervention Services (Revised October 2013)

Dibels Next Benchmarks Kindergarten 2013

Data-Based Decision Making: Academic and Behavioral Applications

DELAWARE CHARTER SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Georgia Department of Education

Progress Monitoring & Response to Intervention in an Outcome Driven Model

GRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL School Improvement Plan

Dibels Math Early Release 2nd Grade Benchmarks

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

ADVANCES IN ASSESSMENT: THE USE OF CHANGE SENSITIVE MEASURES IN COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL-BASED MODELS OF SUPPORT

Port Jervis City School District Academic Intervention Services (AIS) Plan

Grade 5 + DIGITAL. EL Strategies. DOK 1-4 RTI Tiers 1-3. Flexible Supplemental K-8 ELA & Math Online & Print

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Kristin Moser. Sherry Woosley, Ph.D. University of Northern Iowa EBI

Lucy Caulkins Writing Rubrics

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Geographic Area - Englewood

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Thoughtful Commitment: How the Greece Teachers Association (GTA) Advances Social Justice, Student Centered Advocacy and Collaboration ADV400

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

Shelters Elementary School

SER CHANGES~ACCOMMODATIONS PAGES

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

Strategic Improvement Plan

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

WHO ARE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS? HOW CAN THEY HELP THOSE OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM? Christine Mitchell-Endsley, Ph.D. School Psychology

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Safe & Civil Schools Series Overview

Tarrant County Sheriff's Office 2016 Training Calendar

Pyramid. of Interventions

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Executive Programmes 2013

Portfolio-Based Language Assessment (PBLA) Presented by Rebecca Hiebert

Clarkstown Central School District. Response to Intervention & Academic Intervention Services District Plan

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESSING THE HANDOUTS AND THE POWERPOINT

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

Emmaus Lutheran School English Language Arts Curriculum

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Sight Word Assessment

Sec123. Volleyball. 52 Resident Registration begins Aug. 5 Non-resident Registration begins Aug. 14

Spinners at the School Carnival (Unequal Sections)

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

RtI Meeting 9/24/2012. # (Gabel)

Update on the Next Accreditation System Drs. Culley, Ling, and Wood. Anesthesiology April 30, 2014

Answer Key To Geometry Houghton Mifflin Company

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

Cooper Upper Elementary School

School Action Plan: Template Overview

UTAH PARTICIPATION AND ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY

Faculty Feedback User s Guide

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

Scott Foresman Science Grade 4

How To: Structure Classroom Data Collection for Individual Students

The State and District RtI Plans

1.11 I Know What Do You Know?

Sample Of Welcome Back Letter From Vacation

Mathematics Success Grade 7

Peninsula School. District Strategic Plan Dashboard. Slide 1.

Writing Functional Ot Goals In Snf

Grade 3: Module 2B: Unit 3: Lesson 10 Reviewing Conventions and Editing Peers Work

Gifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!

Scott Foresman Addison Wesley. envisionmath

Writing Functional Dysphagia Goals

Welcome to the University of Hertfordshire and the MSc Environmental Management programme, which includes the following pathways:

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

BUS Computer Concepts and Applications for Business Fall 2012

Fire safety in the home

African American Male Achievement Update

Missouri Mathematics Grade-Level Expectations

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

Longman English Interactive

Robert Bennis Elementary School

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

Grade 2: Using a Number Line to Order and Compare Numbers Place Value Horizontal Content Strand

We Are a Place People Can Call Their Medical Home

English Policy Statement and Syllabus Fall 2017 MW 10:00 12:00 TT 12:15 1:00 F 9:00 11:00

Curriculum Design Project with Virtual Manipulatives. Gwenanne Salkind. George Mason University EDCI 856. Dr. Patricia Moyer-Packenham

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

Recent advances in research and. Formulating Secondary-Level Reading Interventions

Glenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Grade 4: Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 4 Word Choice: Using Academic Vocabulary to Apply for a Colonial Trade Job

Transcription:

RtI Criteria for ELA: 2014-2015 *Multiple Criteria at each level should be considered when determining which Tier a child should be placed on. A child must meet 3 or more of the bulleted criteria to be considered for that Tier. **For RTI purposes the benchmarking and progress monitoring scores from the end of the previous year will be used as well as the November I-Ready scores. September I-Ready scores are to be used for identifying the baseline for individual student growth. ***NOTE: DIBELS Next Benchmarks are given in September, January, & May. The Benchmark Goals and Cut Points are to be used as follows when screening: Beginning of Year: September, October, November Middle of Year: December, January, February End of Year: March, April May RTI Teacher Team Grade Level Liaisons 2014-2015 Kindergarten: Jenn LaBella First Grade: Monica Crumrine Second Grade: Liz Waszkiewicz Third Grade: Monica Moshier Fourth Grade: Laura Baye-Broccoli Fifth Grade: Erin Eagan 1

Kindergarten: Below benchmark on DIBELS Next screening ( should be started and documented in classroom) Below average K screening 60%-89% on Scott Foresman Placement Test at beginning of year YELLOW on overall I-Ready Score in Sept. Well Below Benchmark on DIBELS Next screening Well Below Average K screening 59% or Below on Scott Foresman Placement Test at beginning of year or entrance RTI Teacher Team (formerly TST) (K Screening is considered as well as teacher after s have been implemented and documented for 6-8 weeks) RED on overall I-Ready score **ALL Tier 3 s will be made by RTI Data Analysis Team, with provided by classroom teacher and Tier 2 provider, with Tier 2 provided for AT LEAST 6 weeks AND student has not met target goals. and classroom teacher not being met with valid and reliable in place. RTI Data Analysis Team Referral for screening results shows need for further testing. Testing OUT (ALL TIERS): (Student must meet ALL bulleted criteria) of concern Meeting classroom expectations as noted by K check-listing results 2

FIRST GRADE: Below grade level expectation in Reading A-Z (see chart below) Beginning of Year (Sept.- Middle of Year (Dec.-Feb.) End of Year (March-May) Nov.) A & B C&D E, F, G 60-89% on Scott Foresman Placement Test at beginning of year Between 18-21 on Sound/Symbol portion of beginning of year 1 st Grade Screening Between 18-21 on Letter Identification portion of beginning of year 1 st Grade Screening Between 15-25 words read correctly out of 35 Tricky Words portion of beginning of year 1 st Grade Screening (THIS MAY NEED ADJUSTING FOR 2014-2015 SCHOOL YEAR AS THESE WORDS WERE INTRODUCED TOO LATE IN THE 13/14 YEAR.) 65% or below on 3 or more of the ELA module assessments or content area Below 17 on Sound/Symbol portion of beginning of year 1 st Grade Screening Below 17 on Letter Identification portion of beginning of year 1 st Grade Screening Below 25 words read correctly out of 35 Tricky Words portion of 1 st Grade Screening (THIS MAY NEED ADJUSTING FOR 2014-2015 SCHOOL YEAR AS THESE WORDS WERE INTRODUCED TOO LATE IN THE 13/14 YEAR.) Below Grade Level Expectation in Reading A-Z (see chart below): Beginning of Year (Sept.- Middle of Year (Dec.-Feb.) End of Year (March-May) Nov.) aa or below C or below below F 59% or below on Scott Foresman Placement Test at beginning of school year 3

**ALL Tier 3 s will be made via RTI Data Analysis Team, following by classroom teacher and Tier 2 Provider, when Tier 2 and classroom teacher not being met with valid and reliable implemented RTI Data Analysis Team referral for screening results shows need for further testing Testing OUT (ALL TIERS): (Student must meet ALL bulleted criteria) of concern (can include Reading A-Z comprehension/vocabulary assessments). On or Above Grade Level on Reading A-Z Benchmarking Beginning of Year (Sept.- Middle of Year (Dec.-Feb.) End of Year (March-May) Nov.) C or above F or Above H or Above Meeting classroom expectations as determined by grade level team 4

SECOND GRADE: 60%-89% on Scott Foresman Placement Test at beginning of Year or entrance 64% or below on 3 or more of the ELA module assessments or content area In bottom 15% of beginning of year Tricky Word Assessment 59% or below on Scott Foresman Placement Test at beginning of school year **ALL Tier 3 s will be made by RTI Data Analysis Team, with by classroom teacher and Tier 2 Provider, when Tier 2 Tier 2 Goals, set by RTI Data Analysis Team (formerly Teacher Support Team) and classroom teacher, not being met with valid and reliable in place RTI Data Analysis Team referral for screening results shows need for further testing. Testing OUT (ALL TIERS): (Student must meet ALL bulleted criteria) Must earn 85% or better on 3 or more of the ELA assessments in target area of concern Meeting classroom expectations as designed by grade level team 5

THIRD GRADE: 64% or Below on 1 st Scott Foresman Benchmark (5 week test) 64% or below on 3 or more of the ELA module assessments or content area 64% or below on 2 or more of the Scott Foresman Benchmark tests **ALL Tier 3 s will be made via RTI Data Analysis Team, with from classroom teacher and Tier 2 Provider, when Tier 2 Well Below Benchmark on DIBELS Next DAZE assessment and classroom teacher not being met with valid and reliable RTI Teacher Team referral for screening results shows need for further testing. Testing OUT (ALL TIERS): (Student must meet ALL bulleted criteria) of concern (can include Scott Foresman Benchmarks) Meeting classroom expectations as designed by grade level 6

FOURTH GRADE: 64% or Below on 1 st Scott Foresman Benchmark (5 week test) NYS test scores fall within a score of 291-298 64% or below on 3 or more of the ELA module assessments or content area 64% or below on 2 or more of the Scott Foresman Benchmark tests NYS test scores fall within a score of 260-290 **ALL Tier 3 s will be made by RTI Data Analysis Team, with from classroom teacher and Tier 2 Provider, when Tier 2 Well Below Benchmark on DIBELS Next DAZE assessment and classroom teacher are not being met RTI Data Analysis Team referral for screening results shows need for further testing. NYS test scores fall within a score of 259 and Below Testing OUT (ALL TIERS): (Student must meet at least four bulleted criteria) of concern (can include Scott Foresman Benchmarks) Meeting classroom expectations as designed by grade level 7

NYS test scores fall within a score of 299 and Above. FIFTH GRADE: Below Benchmark on DIBELS Next DAZE assessment 64% or below on content area comprehension assessments NYS test scores fall within a score of 287-295 64% or below on 3 or more of the ELA module assessments or content area NYS test scores fall within a score of 260-286 **ALL Tier 3 s will be made by RTI Data Analysis Team, with from classroom teacher and Tier 2 Provider, when Tier 2 Well Below Benchmark on DIBELS Next Screening Well Below Benchmark on DIBELS Next DAZE assessment and classroom teacher not being met RTI Data Analysis Team referral for screening results shows need for further testing. NYS test score of 259 and Below. Testing OUT (ALL TIERS): (Student must meet at least four bulleted criteria) of concern (can include Scott Foresman Benchmarks) Meeting classroom expectations as designed by grade level team 8

NYS test scores fall within a score of 296 and Above. 9