How did the average state score?

Similar documents
FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

Trends in College Pricing

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Anatomy and Physiology. Astronomy. Boomilever. Bungee Drop

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuities

Brian Isetts University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Anthony W. Olson PharmD University of Minnesota, Twin Cities,

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

Career Services JobFlash! as of July 26, 2017

Canada and the American Curriculum:

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

NC Community College System: Overview

Financial Education and the Credit Behavior of Young Adults

EPA Approved Laboratories for UCMR 3

James H. Walther, Ed.D.

Findings from the 2005 College Student Survey (CSS): National Aggregates. Victor B. Saenz Douglas S. Barrera

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Hokulani Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

2014 State Residency Conference Frequently Asked Questions FAQ Categories

School Physical Activity Policy Assessment (S-PAPA)

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

King-Devick Reading Acceleration Program

STRONG STANDARDS: A Review of Changes to State Standards Since the Common Core

ATTRIBUTES OF EFFECTIVE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

National Child Passenger Safety Certification Training Program. Planning and Logistics Guide

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

93 percent of local providers will not be awarded competitive bidding contracts 2.

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

The Economic Impact of College Bowl Games

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Specification of the Verity Learning Companion and Self-Assessment Tool

Loudoun Scholarship Application

Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

136 Joint Commission Accredited Organizations (1273 sites*) with Primary Care Medical Home (PCMH) Certification (by state) as of 1/1/2015

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Discussion Papers. Assessing the New Federalism. State General Assistance Programs An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies

Further, Robert W. Lissitz, University of Maryland Huynh Huynh, University of South Carolina ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Daniel B. Boatright. Focus Areas. Overview

African American Male Achievement Update

Gena Bell Vargas, Ph.D., CTRS

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Grant/Scholarship General Criteria CRITERIA TO APPLY FOR AN AESF GRANT/SCHOLARSHIP

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Montana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education

Shelters Elementary School

Charity Cayton 3921A Granada Dr, Winterville, NC Phone: (336) ,

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

JANIE HODGE, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Special Education 225 Holtzendorff Clemson University

Why Science Standards are Important to a Strong Science Curriculum and How States Measure Up

Ready Common Core Ccls Answer Key

Jeffrey H. Diritto, M.S., CSCS, SCCC, USAW

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

IBM Training Custom Catalog

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

STATE-BY-STATE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

Virginia Principles & Practices of Real Estate for Salespersons

CROSS-BATTERY ASSESSMENT, SLD DETERMINATION, AND THE ASSESSMENT- INTERVENTION CONNECTION

RC-FM Staff. Objectives 4/22/2013. Geriatric Medicine: Update from the RC-FM. Eileen Anthony, Executive Director; ;

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

MJC ASSOCIATE DEGREE NURSING MULTICRITERIA SCREENING PROCESS ADVISING RECORD (MSPAR) - Assembly Bill (AB) 548 (extension of AB 1559)

Diploma of Building and Construction (Building)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Statistical Studies: Analyzing Data III.B Student Activity Sheet 7: Using Technology

State Parental Involvement Plan

NETWORK DEVELOPMENT GRANTEES

Houghton Mifflin Online Assessment System Walkthrough Guide

FTE General Instructions

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

John F. Kennedy Middle School

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Jon N. Kerr, PhD, CPA August 2017

Transcription:

About This Report This State Technology Report is a supplement to the 11th edition of Technology Counts, a joint project of Education Week and the Editorial Projects in Education Research Center. As in previous years, the EPE Research Center surveyed the states to assess the status of K-12 educational technology across the nation in the areas of access, use, and capacity. The report assigns grades to the states for their technology performance overall and in those three categories. The state report assembles key findings from the survey and other sources in a format that allows readers to examine a particular state s performance. For most indicators, national results are also provided as a benchmark against which the state can be measured. State grades are not comparable with those in last year s report because of changes in two access indicators. As its theme this year, Technology Counts 2008 explores the push to improve education in the STEM fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Because of this, the state report also tracks achievement data in mathematics and science from the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The full Technology Counts 2008 report can be accessed online at www.edweek.org/go/tc08. STATE TECHNOLOGY REPORT CARD 2008 How did the average state score? Access to technology A C Use of technology A- B- Capacity to use technology A C Overall grade A C+ Grading the States For Technology Counts 2008, the EPE Research Center awarded grades for technology leadership to the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Grading is based on 14 individual indicators spanning three core areas of state policy and practice: access to instructional technology, use of technology, and capacity to effectively use educational technology. Information on technology use and capacity was obtained from a 2007 nationwide survey of state technology officials conducted by the EPE Research Center. Indicators related to educational technology access were derived from a 2005-06 public school survey conducted by Market Data Retrieval, a research company that tracks the use of educational technology, and from background questionnaires administered as part of the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress. The EPE Research Center evaluated each indicator, assigning a certain number of points to each. States received credit for the use and capacity indicators only if they could document that the respective policy or practice was in place. Points were tallied within each of the three technology categories, producing scores on a 100-point scale. To generate an overall score, the Research Center computed the average of the three category scores and then converted that total score to a letter grade. Technology Counts Grading Breakdown This table reports the detailed scoring behind the grades for the three major areas of state policy examined in Technology Counts. Access to Technology U.S. Capacity to Use Technology Does state have policy? Percent of students with State includes technology in its Number of states with policy Access to computers (4 th grade) 100% 95% Teacher standards Yes 44 Access to computers (8 th grade) 97% 83% Administrator standards Yes 35 Number of students per Initial teacher-license requirements Yes 19 Instructional computer 3.2 3.8 Initial administrator-license requirements Yes 9 High-speed Internet-connected computer 3.0 3.7 Teacher-recertification requirements Yes 10 Administrator-recertification requirements Yes 6 Use of Technology Does state have policy? Number of states with policy Overall Technology Score points awarded Average state points awarded Student standards include technology Yes 48 Access to technology 96.3 75.3 State tests students on technology No 5 Use of technology 89.8 80.1 State has established a virtual school Yes 25 Capacity to use technology 100.0 75.5 State offers computer-based assessments Yes 27 Total score (average of three categories) 95.3 76.9 Grading Curve A (93-100), A- (90-92), B+ (87-89), B (83-86), B- (80-82), C+ (77-79), C (73-76), C- (70-72), D+ (67-69), D (63-66), D- (60-62), F (0-59) 2

Integrating State Technology Standards National Perspective In just over half of states, technology standards exist as distinct, stand-alone documents. But in keeping with a trend toward integrating technology throughout the curriculum, 22 states embed technology expectations within the standards of other subjects. Six of those states have both stand-alone and embedded technology standards. In all,15 states embed technology standards across-the-board into English, math, science, and history. 50 45 40 35 30 Both (6) Embedded (16) Technology Standards for Students Both embedded and stand-alone: AR, DE, MA, SD, TN, WV Stand-alone: Embedded only: CA, CO, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, KS, ME, MN, MO, NM, PA, RI, SC, WY AL, AK, AZ, CT, ID, KY, LA, MD, MI, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WI No technology standards: DC, IA, MS 25 20 15 10 5 0 Stand alone (26) No Technology Standards (3) Technology Use and Capacity Policies National Perspective The EPE Research Center has examined state technology use and capacity policies. Ten key policies, listed on the first page of this state report, are summarized in this map. The states with the strongest use and capacity policies in the 2007-08 school year are Georgia (10 policies) and West Virginia (9 policies). At the other end of the spectrum, Montana and Nevada each have one policy, while the District of Columbia has adopted none of the policies. DC = 0 policies Number of Policies 7 to 10 (7) 4 to 6 (30) 0 to 3 (14) 3

Overall Grade on State Technology Leadership The nation earns a grade of C-plus for leadership in technology policy and practice, based on an analysis of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. earns the only A, while Georgia and South Dakota receive A-minus marks. DC = D- Most states demonstrated relatively uneven performance across the areas of access, use, and capacity. Overall grade A- to A (3) B- to B+ (13) C- to C+ (28) D- to D+ (7) Student Performance in STEM Subjects State Average State Rank National Average Achievement Levels 4th grade math Percent proficient on NAEP (2007) 32.6% 39 38.6% 8th grade math Percent proficient on NAEP (2007) 18.5% 47 31.0% 4th grade science Percent proficient on NAEP (2005) 23.7% 35 27.0% 8th grade science Percent proficient on NAEP (2005) 23.4% 31 27.3% Achievement Gains 4th grade math Scale score change on NAEP (2003-2007) +5.6 20 +5.1 8th grade math Scale score change on NAEP (2003-2007) -0.7 50 +4.1 4th grade science Scale score change on NAEP (2000-2005) +2.0 15 +4.3 8th grade science Scale score change on NAEP (2000-2005) +0.7 13-0.6 Poverty Gap (National School Lunch Program, noneligible vs. eligible) Math gap 8th grade NAEP scale score (2007) 19.2 9 26.0 Science gap 8th grade NAEP scale score (2005) 19.6 13 28.1 Math-gap change 8th grade NAEP (2003-2007), negative value = closing gap +0.7 40-2.4 Science-gap change 8th grade NAEP (2000-2005), negative value = closing gap -2.4 12-3.5 Achieving Excellence 4th grade math Percent advanced on 4th grade NAEP (2007) 3.0% 43 5.5% 8th grade math Percent advanced on 8th grade NAEP (2007) 2.2% 48 6.6% 4th grade science Percent advanced on 4th grade NAEP (2005) 1.1% 40 2.3% 8th grade science Percent advanced on 8th grade NAEP (2005) 1.8% 34 2.9% 4

Teachers With Majors in Assigned Fields (2003-04) State Average State Rank National Average Math teachers Percent in grades 7-12 who majored in math 74% 7 61% Science teachers Percent in grades 7-12 who majored in science 72% 33 77% Note: Teachers with majors in math education or science education were not included in these figures. Filling STEM Teaching Positions a Challenge: A National Perspective About two-thirds of schools with vacancies in biology, physical sciences, or math reported difficulty filling those posts. By contrast, only 41 percent of schools experienced difficulty filling English/language arts positions. SOURCE: EPE Research Center analysis of data from the U.S. Department of Education s Schools and Staffing Survey 2003-04 Schools reporting difficulty filling vacant positions 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 41% English/ language arts 49% Computer science 65% 65% 67% Biology Physical sciences Math Technology Assistance for Classroom Teachers Teachers receive assistance in using technology from a variety of different individuals. In about one-quarter of schools, teachers receive most of their technology help from another full-time teacher. District-level coordinators offer the bulk of support in 21 percent of schools. Principals and school administrators are the main source of this assistance in only 6 percent of schools. Full time teacher District level coordinator Another person School level coordinator who has no other responsibilities Library media specialist Principal or another school administrator No one serves this function 6% 3% 13% 12% 15% 21% 26% Part time teacher 3% Contractor 1% SOURCE: EPE Research Center Analysis of the U.S. Department of Education s Schools and Staffing Survey 2003-04 Volunteer 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% Schools 5

Sources and Notes State Technology Indicators Most of the state policy indicators reported in Technology Counts are obtained through an original policy survey conducted annually by the Editorial Projects in Education Research Center. The Research Center sent surveys to the chief state technology officers in all 50 states and to the superintendent of the District of Columbia public schools. Respondents provided information on policy indicators related to educational technology and competencies of students and educators. Every state response was carefully verified using additional evidence provided by the state, such as documentation describing a state statute or administrative rule. For some indicators on access to technology, the EPE Research Center obtained information from Market Data Retrieval, or MDR, a research organization in Shelton, Conn., that tracks trends in educational technology, and from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics. Grading the States For Technology Counts 2008, the EPE Research Center graded state leadership in the areas of technology access, use, and capacity, based on data compiled for 14 individual indicators of state policy and practice. Each indicator was evaluated and assigned a certain number of points, with some indicators receiving greater weight than others. States were not awarded credit for an indicator unless they were able to document that the respective policy was in place. The Research Center tallied points within each of the three policy categories on a 100-point scale. These three subscores were averaged to produce an overall technology score, which was then converted to a letter grade. A detailed explanation of the grading methodology can be found in the full edition of Technology Counts 2008. Technology Access Percent of 4th grade students with access to computers: The percent of 4th grade students in public schools whose math teachers report that computers are available for use by their students. National Assessment of Educational Progress, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, 2007. Percent of 8th grade students with access to computers: Ibid. Students per instructional computer: The average number of students who share each computer available for student instruction. Market Data Retrieval, "2005-06 Public School Technology Survey. Students per high-speed Internetconnected computer: Ibid. Technology Use & Capacity Editorial Projects in Education Research Center annual state policy survey, 2007. Survey respondents were asked about state policies that promote technology use and capacity. STEM Student Performance: National Assessment of Educational Progress in Science 2005. National Assessment of Educational Progress in Mathematics 2007. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, 2005 and 2007. Teacher Quality in STEM Fields: U.S. Department of Education s Schools and Staffing Survey 2003-04. Council of Chief State School Officers, 2007. About Editorial Projects in Education Editorial Projects in Education (EPE) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization based in Bethesda, Md. Its primary mission is to help raise the level of awareness and understanding among professionals and the public of important issues in American education. EPE covers local, state, national, and international news and issues from preschool through the 12th grade. Editorial Projects in Education Inc. publishes Education Week, America s newspaper of record for precollegiate education; edweek.org; Digital Directions; teachermagazine.org; Teacher Professional Development Sourcebook; and the TopSchoolJobs.org recruitment marketplace. It also produces periodic special reports on issues ranging from technology to textbooks, as well as books of special interest to educators. The EPE Research Center conducts annual policy surveys, collects data, and performs analyses that appear in the Quality Counts, Technology Counts, and Diplomas Count annual reports. The center also produces independent research reports, contributes original data and analysis to special coverage in Education Week and edweek.org, and maintains the Education Counts and EdWeek Maps online data resources. 6

Editorial Projects in Education Research Center 6935 Arlington Road Bethesda, MD 20814 Technology Counts 2008: A Digital Decade Technology Counts 2008 This year s full report examines the role of technology in the push to improve STEM: science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Technology Counts grades the states in three critical areas of technology leadership: providing access to technology, use of technology, and capacity to use technology effectively. State Technology Reports Individualized reports featuring state-specific findings from the 2008 Technology Counts report are available for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Education Counts This online database contains hundreds of state-level indicators on K-12 education collected over the past decade for Education Week s annual Technology Counts, Diplomas Count, and Quality Counts reports. Use the Custom Table Builder feature to create graphs, tables, or maps for specific indicators. Technology Counts 2008 is available online at www.edweek.org/go/tc08