APPENDIX D. Common Metrics and Accountability Measures. Applicable to Requests for Applications of the Division of Workforce and Economic Development

Similar documents
State Budget Update February 2016

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Adult Education ACCE Presentation. Neil Kelly February 2, 2017

Braiding Funds. Registered Apprenticeship

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Program Elements Definitions and Structure

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

Upward Bound Program

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

District Consultation Council Meeting. April 24, :00 p.m. Anaheim Campus Room 105 AGENDA

Foreign Languages. Foreign Languages, General

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

Network Technology/Cisco and Linux Networking Education Report. 5, % $27.63/hr

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

21 st Century Apprenticeship Models

The mission of the Grants Office is to secure external funding for college priorities via local, state, and federal funding sources.

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

UPPER SECONDARY CURRICULUM OPTIONS AND LABOR MARKET PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A GRADUATES SURVEY IN GREECE

Improving recruitment, hiring, and retention practices for VA psychologists: An analysis of the benefits of Title 38

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

MINUTES. Kentucky Community and Technical College System Board of Regents. Workshop September 15, 2016

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Targetsim Toolbox. Business Board Simulations: Features, Value, Impact. Dr. Gudrun G. Vogt Targetsim Founder & Managing Partner

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Program Change Proposal:

An Analysis of the El Reno Area Labor Force

Physics/Astronomy/Physical Science. Program Review

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Internship Program. Employer and Student Handbook

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Final Report. to the Los Rios Community College District Board, the President of Cosumnes River College

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

Java Programming. Specialized Certificate

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

State Parental Involvement Plan

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Career and Technical Education (CTE) Graduation Rates in Tennessee: A Comparative Study. A dissertation. presented to

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Strategic Planning Guide

Evaluating Progress NGA Center for Best Practices STEM Summit

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Module Title: Managing and Leading Change. Lesson 4 THE SIX SIGMA

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

CAREER SERVICES Career Services 2020 is the new strategic direction of the Career Development Center at Middle Tennessee State University.

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

FIELD PLACEMENT PROGRAM: COURSE HANDBOOK

University Library Collection Development and Management Policy

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

New Features & Functionality in Q Release Version 3.1 January 2016

NC Community College System: Overview

ANNUAL SCHOOL REPORT SEDA COLLEGE SUITE 1, REDFERN ST., REDFERN, NSW 2016

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Chapter 1: MV/CESA4 Youth Apprenticeship & Wisconsin s General Program Design

CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY

ARTS ADMINISTRATION CAREER GUIDE. Fine Arts Career UTexas.edu/finearts/careers

SUPPORTING COMMUNITY COLLEGE DELIVERY OF APPRENTICESHIPS

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Services for Children and Young People

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Transcription:

APPENDIX D Background In 2004, Assembly Bill 1417 triggered the creation of a performance measurement system for the California Community Colleges. That legislation and ensuing budget action authorized the California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office (CCCCO) to design and implement a performance measurement system containing performance indicators for the system and its colleges. This comprehensive system is known as the Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, or ARCC. In 2012, the Student Success Task Force (SSTF) formed by Senate Bill 1143 recommended the implementation of a new accountability framework to provide stakeholders with clear and concise information on key student progress and success metrics in order to improve performance. The recommendation emphasized that a scorecard be built on the existing ARCC reporting system. Following adoption of the SSTF recommendations, the ARCC (2.0) Advisory Workgroup, which guided the development of the initial accountability system in 2005, was reconvened. The workgroup had representation by individuals from various community college organizations and stakeholder groups, as well as researchers with technical expertise in performance measures. This technical workgroup reviewed the existing framework and designed the new scorecard to be released across the system in 2013. ARCC 2.0 Framework The ARCC Advisory Workgroup recommends a four-tiered accountability framework, where each level targets a different audience or user. The first level provides a report of the state of the system, a high level overview for legislators and policy makers that summarizes a number of state level aggregations of data and annual performance. The scorecard itself is the second level and measures progress and completion at each college for various groups of student demographics, including those with different levels of college preparation. This will be the core of the framework and part of the report that focuses on the performance of each college and incorporates many of the recommendations from the SSTF, such as providing metrics pertaining to momentum points, the disaggregation of metrics by racial and ethnic groups and the inclusion of students taking less than 12 units. 1

The third level is the ability to drill down further into the scorecard metrics through the existing online query tool, Datamart 2.0 and for CTE, the addition of the LaunchBoard. The fourth and most detailed level is the ability for researchers to download the datasets (Data-on-Demand) pertaining to each metric for their particular college. The details of the above accountability framework can be viewed at the following URL: http://extranet.cccco.edu/portals/1/executiveoffice/board/2012_agenda/november/4_4_scorec ard.pdf Measures The accountability for and measurement of grant activities administered through CCCCO s Workforce and Economic Development Division is based on the above ARCC 2.0 framework and augments that work because scope of the Division s grants span from middle schools through community college as well as post community college and into the workforce. Three categories of measures have been included: Quality of service (applies to key talent roles) Leading indicators of curriculum alignment to labor market needs Student momentum points Depending on the performance requirements of the funding stream from which the grant originated, certain measures within these three categories will become more relevant, but the overriding objective of moving the needle on student outcomes remains, rather than the prior practice of monitoring activities and outputs. With this unified framework of common metrics and accountability measures, funding and program decisions can be more data-driven and evidence-based given what works in moving students towards success. Quality of Service Measures Certain grants are designated as key talents grants for the system. Key talents facilitate and promote collaboration within a region, a sector, and/or their key constituents. These activities lead to quality of services as measured by: QS 0. QS 1. QS 2. QS 3. 360-degree evaluation The tool will be provided by the CCCCO. Parties surveyed will give consideration to the individual s performance in the following minimum areas: Leadership and responsiveness as a member of the Extended Operations Team of the CCCCO Division of Workforce and Economic Development. Strength of partnership with education and industry partners Strength of awareness and influence on state and regional policy related issues 2

QS 4. Strength of leadership and coordination in building of necessary supporting capacity, such as center, advisories, collaborative communities, and a hub. Leading Indicators of Curriculum Alignment to Labor Market Needs A number of efforts take a long time to manifest in ARCC 2.0 outcomes, therefore the use of leading indicators can serve as predictors of student progression in the interim. The following leading indicators have been identified to facilitate alignment of educational programming to labor market needs. Occurrences of the following: LI 1. Alignment of skillsets within a program (or set of courses) to a particular occupation and the needs of the labor market LI 2. Regionalization of stackable certificates aligned with a particular occupation ladder LI 3. Alignment of a certificate with state-, industry-, nationally-, and/or employer- recognized certification LI 4. Creation of a credit certificate from non-credit certificate LI 5. Curriculum articulation along a career or multi-career educational pathway LI 6. Updating the skills of faculty, teachers, counselors, and/or supporting staff to student to reflect labor market needs LI 7. Integration of small business creation and/or exporting modules into forcredit curriculum in other disciplines During 2013-14, Regional Consortia Chairs will report progress on Leading Indicators as part of their Final Report. In subsequent years, employer-led advisory bodies will evaluate the effectiveness of these efforts, on a scale of 1-5 where: 5 = exceeds expectation 4 = meets expectation 3 = almost meets expectation 2 = below expectation 1 = does not meet expectation Student Momentum Points The data related to each momentum point will be collected automatically or if necessary, added manually to the LaunchBoard. This information will provide visibility to the influence of the grant expenditures on the success of our students. Not all momentum points must be or need to be satisfied by each grantee. Grantees should refer to their work plans to determine which momentum points they are responsible for documenting. Momentum points have been clustered according to the student s educational pathways for the reader s convenience. 3

Note on definitions: CTE Pathways For the Common Metrics, CTE pathways refer to clusters of related programs. K-12 CTE Industry Sector Codes are the CBEDS codes specified in the CTE Pathways Matrix. Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes are the four-digit or six-digit Taxonomy of Program (TOP) codes specified in the CTE Pathways Matrix. Four-year University CTE Industry Sector Codes are the four-digit or six-digit Classification of Instructional Program (CIP) codes specified in the CTE Pathways Matrix. To view the CTE Pathways Matrix a master list of which programs are included in specific CTE pathways, which sector they belong to, and how they are aligned between K-12, community colleges, and four-year universities please visit http://doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu/launchboard.aspx. If a program is assigned to an incorrect code in the CTE Pathways Matrix, CTE deans should send an email to launchboard@cccco.edu to indicate their recommended designation. This recommendation will then be reviewed by the Chancellor s Office. CTE Students Students are considered to be on a K-12 CTE pathway if they take one course while in high school in a pathway identified in the CTE Pathways Matrix or if grantees submit information on that individual student (such as participants in a career awareness workshop). Students are considered to be in a community college CTE pathway if they take one or more courses while in community college in a pathway identified in the CTE Pathways Matrix or if grantees submit information on that individual learner (such as participants in contract education). Students are considered to be in a four-year university/college CTE pathway if they declare a major while in a four-year institution in a pathway identified in the CTE Pathways Matrix. A first-time student is a student who enrolled in a community college for the first time after high school (having not previously enrolled in a post-secondary educational institution). The cohort of students included in the Common Metrics reflects a broad definition of CTE participation, including students enroll in apprenticeship programs, students who take foundational CTE courses in addition to higher-level courses, and students who engage in short-term course-taking. This is a more comprehensive definition of CTE participation than is used in California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office reports such as the CTE Scorecard and the Salary Surfer, to ensure that information is gathered on students who do not complete programs as well as those who do, to drive program improvement. The LaunchBoard will include the ability to filter outcomes for multiple cohorts including: A CTE participant cohort (students who have taken one or more CTE courses) 4

The CTE Scorecard cohort (students taking 8 or more units of higher-level CTE courses within a specific sector) The CTE Outcomes Survey cohort (students taking 9 or more units in a broad range of CTE courses) A low-unit skills-builder cohort (students taking fewer than 9 units in a broad range of CTE courses) Custom cohorts uploaded by a college Middle School Cluster MP 1. Completed an individual career and skills awareness workshop in middle school that included a normed assessment process and was in a Doing What Matters priority or emerging sector Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, Middle School CDS Code (County, District, School), Term and/or Academic Year, K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally, Social Security Number. or LaunchBoard Additional Tracking Tool Transition from Middle School to High School MP 2. Completed a bridge program between middle school and high school and revised student career/education plan Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, Middle School CDS Code (County, District, School), High School CDS Code (County, District, School), Term and/or Academic Year, K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally, Social Security Number. or LaunchBoard Additional Tracking Tool MP 3. Completed a student orientation & assessment program while in middle school or high school Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, Middle School CDS Code (County, District, School), High School CDS Code (County, District, School), Term and/or Academic Year, K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally, Social Security Number and Community College IPEDS ID. or LaunchBoard Additional Tracking Tool 5

High School Cluster MP 4. Completed one course in high school within a CTE pathway (County, District, School), Term and/or Academic Year, California Basic Educational Data System Code (CBEDS), K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally, Social Security Number. MP 5. MP 6. MP 6A. MP 7. Completed two or more courses in high school within a CTE pathway (County, District, School), Term and/or Academic Year, California Basic Educational Data System Code (CBEDS), K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally, Social Security Number. Completed a CTE articulated course (County, District, School), Community College IPEDS ID, Term and/or Academic Year, California Basic Educational Data System Code (CBEDS), K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, Local High School Course Code, and optionally, Social Security Number. Successfully completed a CTE dual enrollment course or credit by exam, with receipt of transcripted credits (County, District, School), Community College IPEDS ID, Term and/or Academic Year, California Basic Educational Data System Code (CBEDS), K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally, Social Security Number. Completed a program in high school within a CTE pathway (County, District, School), Term and/or Academic Year, California Basic Educational Data System Code (CBEDS), K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally, Social Security Number. 6

Transition from High School to College Cluster MP 8. Completed a bridge program between high school and college in a CTE pathway (County, District, School), Community College IPEDS ID, Term and/or Academic Year, K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally, Social Security Number. or LaunchBoard Additional Tracking Tool MP 9. MP 10. MP 11. MP 12. Completed college orientation & assessment as a first-time community college student who entered a community college CTE pathway High School CDS Code (County, District, School), Community College IPEDS ID, Term and/or Academic Year, K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Transitioned from a high school CTE pathway to a similar community college CTE pathway High School CDS Code (County, District, School), Community College IPEDS ID, Term and/or Academic Year, K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Transferred from a high school CTE pathway to a similar CSU, UC or private/independent university CTE pathway High School CDS Code (County, District, School), University IPEDS ID, Term and/or Academic Year, K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, University CTE Industry Sector Code. Completed a counselor-approved college education plan, for first-time community college students who enter a CTE pathway 7

MP 13. MP 14. During high school, participated in an internship, work-based learning, mentoring, or job shadowing program in a CTE pathway (County, District, School), Term and/or Academic Year, K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally Social Security Number. or LaunchBoard Additional Tracking Tool Percentage of community college students, who participated in a high school CTE pathway, whose first math or English course was below transfer-level High School CDS Code (County, District, School), Community College IPEDS ID, Term and/or Academic Year, California Basic Educational Data System Code (CBEDS), K-12 CTE Industry Sector Code, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, Basic Skills Courses Taken. Community College Cluster MP 15. Completed two courses in the same CTE Pathway o Data elements: Statewide Student ID (SSID), Local Student ID, Social Security Number, Last Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, MP 16. MP 17. Retention rate between Fall and Spring within a CTE pathway o Data elements: Statewide Student ID (SSID), Local Student ID, Social Security Number, Last Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, Completed a non-cccco-approved certificate within a CTE pathway Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, Credit or Noncredit status. 8

MP 18. Completed a CCCCO-approved certificate within a CTE pathway o Data elements: Statewide Student ID (SSID), Local Student ID, Social Security Number, Last Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, Credit or Noncredit status. General Education and Transfer Progress Cluster MP 19. Completed a work readiness soft skills training program (either stand-alone or embedded) within a CTE pathway Source: Campus Submitted file MP 20. MP 21. MP 22. Completed college level English and/or math, for students in a CTE pathway College- Level English and Math Courses Passed, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes. Completed the CSU-GE or IGETC transfer track/certificate for students in a CTE pathway Source: Campus Submitted file Completed requirements in a CTE pathway, but did not receive a certificate or a degree 9

MP 23. MP 24. MP 25. MP 26. Completed an associate degree in a CTE major o Data elements: Statewide Student ID (SSID), Local Student ID, Social Security Number, Last Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, Completed an associate degree in a major different from student s college CTE pathway College Goal, Transferred from community college to a four-year university in the same CTE pathway Community College IPEDS ID, University IPEDS ID, Term and/or Academic Year, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, University CTE Industry Sector Code. Transferred from community college to a four-year university in a major different from their CTE pathway Community College IPEDS ID, University IPEDS ID, Term and/or Academic Year, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, University CTE Industry Sector Code. Community College Transition to Workforce Cluster MP 27. Participated in a college internship or workplace learning program within a CTE pathway MP 28. Attained a job placement in the same or similar field of study as CTE pathway 10

Source: CTE Employment Outcomes Survey or Campus Submitted File MP 29. Acquired an industry-recognized, third-party credential o Data elements: Statewide Student ID (SSID), Local Student ID, Social Security Number, Last Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, Source: CTE Employment Outcomes Survey or Campus Submitted File Workforce Progress Cluster MP 30. Attained a wage gain in a career in the same or similar CTE pathway College Community CTE Industry Sector Code. Source: CTE Employment Outcomes Survey or Campus Submitted File MP 31. MP 32. MP 33. Attained wages equal to or greater than the median regional wage for that CTE pathway Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, Wages Reported through the Unemployment Insurance Database, Wages Reported through EMSI. Attained wages greater than the regional standard-of-living wage o Data elements: Statewide Student ID (SSID), Local Student ID, Social Security Number, Last Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, Wages Reported through Unemployment Insurance, Self Sufficiency Standards Designated by the Living Insight Center for Community Economic Development. Participated in incumbent worker training or contract education in a CTE pathway (for example training for layoff aversion, meeting heightened occupational credentialing requirement, transitioning employees whose occupations are being eliminated, or up-skilling existing employees) 11

o Data elements: Last Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender, Community College CTE Industry Sector Codes, and optionally Social Security Number. or LaunchBoard Additional Tracking Tool MP 34. Exception For grants providing direct services to an employer, a group of employers, or an industry sector or industry cluster (including Small Business and Global Trade), if there is no alignment with any of the Student Momentum Points and/or Leading Indicators listed above, perform an assessment of the purported beneficial impact of the grant on the relevant businesses, which may include a review of the grant's purported impacts on any of the following: increased profitability, increased labor productivity, reductions in worker injuries, employer cost savings resulting from improved business processes, improved customer satisfaction, increased employee retention, increased number of employees, increased revenue projections, increased sales, penetrated new markets, as well as information on new products or services developed. o Data elements: Determined by grantees in conjunction with their grant monitors. Momentum Point 34 outcomes will not be in the LaunchBoard. 12