INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS The Best Place to Start PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT Interior Design Technology Program Review annually assesses the viability of credit and non-credit instructional programs and makes recommendations on program improvement and viability (see College Procedure 2030118: Program Review) The Office of Institutional Research (IR) provides the data; the Office of Institutional Effectiveness (IE) produces the report, which presents the data by program Deans/Directors submit, into an online database, strategies that address unmet Viability and Quality Indicators for all programs, as appropriate, and by site, if data are available by site The strategies appear in the following year s Program Review Report, which closes the loop by assessing the success of previous planning /Not is based on District, not site, performance Data by site are shown where possible - District: District performance, ASC: Administrative Services Center, Ft Bliss: Ft Bliss, MDP: Mission Del Paso, NW: Northwest, RG: Rio Grande, TM: Transmountain, VV: Valle Verde Standards after slashes denote critical thresholds, which, for information only, indicate especially unacceptable performance and if not met, are marked "Not -Critical" Citation of a year such as "15" or "2015" refers to the 2014-2015 academic year Note: The Workforce Demand data for the Career and Technical/Health Career programs appear at the end of the report OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF RESEARCH AND ACCOUNTABILITY Z:RS/2012 2013 REPORT/PROGREVRPT2012 2013 COVER 2 22 2013FORM EPCC does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, gender, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity
Area Effectiveness Assessment Report - Four Column El Paso Community College Technology Program Review Committee No Formal Review - Viability above 50% Action Required: Recommendation Last Viable Program Year: Current Year Critical 10000 Findings: Mandatory Accreditation: No (%) Viability Score: : 8750% : 100% (%) Quality Score : : 7778% : 8125% Committee Viability Review: No formal review The program met a sufficient percentage of its viability indicators Determination: Program Type: Career and Technical Education Program Committee Improvement Review: The program should address each unmet Viability and Quality Indicator through Area Effectiveness Suggestions: Plans Indicators Measures & Standard / N/A Results Technology - Viability State Mandate 1-1 No of Graduates No of graduates within latest 3-year period (Fall, Spring, Summer) for which State data are available, based on no of graduates for each program (Since the State counts awards, rather than persons, graduates with more than 1 award are counted more than once) (For information only, after the Current Score is printed the latest 3-yr total of awards known to the College, but not yet available from the State) Source: Annual Data Profile, Mainframe 15/<10 11/02/2012-29 For inf Only, EPCC Data: 36 11/10/2011-23 For inf Only, EPCC Data: 34 Technology - Viability State Mandate 2-2 Student Success Percent of students employed/transfer/enter military w/in 1 yr of grad, based on the no of graduates for each program for last 3 years for which State data are available and the number of those graduates who are 11/01/2012-931% 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 1 of 13
employed, have transferred to another institution or have entered the military within one-year of graduation (Additional documentation may be provided by Districtwide Coordinator) Source: Annual Data Profile and/or Automated Student and Adult Learner Follow-up System 90%/<50% 11/10/2011-957% Technology - Viability Instructional Support 1-1 Workforce Demand Whether the sum of new and replacement jobs in the field forecast for El Paso and Hudspeth Counties and the New Mexico counties of Dona Ana, Luna and Otero during the 5 years following the publication of the Program Review Report meets or exceeds the number of graduates during the 5 years preceding the publication of the report To ensure that the data include career paths addressed by the program, each program shall provide the IE Office with a list of jobs for which it prepares graduates (See EMSI Report in TracDat Document Repository) Sources: Mainframe/State Lonestar, EMSI Database 11/05/2012 -, for 62 graduates in last 5 years 11/10/2011 -, for 55 graduates in last 5 years Technology - Viability Instructional Support 2-2 Contact/credit Hours per FT Faculty Sufficient contact/credit hours, District-wide, disregarding lecturers, for FT faculty workload (per College policy), based on total no of contact/credit hours for all courses in the discipline for last 3 years (Fall, Spring) and total no of full-time faculty teaching during Fall and Spring of the last 3 years (Excluding CE courses) (Unduplicated) (Cred Tran & Cred Occ versions of 10/30/2012-11/10/2011-02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 2 of 13
programs share the same results) Source: Program Review Status Form completed by Dean of District Discipline Coordinator/CE Dean/Director /No Technology - Viability Instructional Support 3-3 Class Fill Rate Data by District/Site Percent of classes 75% full (optimum fill rate) on census date (Excluding CE students), based on no of students in each section for last 3 years (Fall, Spring, and Summer) on census date Optimum (set by VP's of instructional programs): No of students that can be adequately taught in a section of the course (For information only, District average fill rate appears in the row below the foregoing data: Total number of seats filled divided by the total number of seats available) Room capacity (set by Physical Plant): No of chairs/equipment in a room If the room capacity is below the optimum, the room capacity is used to score the indicator (For information only, the measure is also calculated to include concurrent students) Source: Master Class Schedule (Mainframe) District 80%/<50% See measure above TM 80%/<50% 11/05/2012 - D: 94% For inf only, If Standard were 75%:, If 70%: Dist Seat Count: 939% Class fill with concurrent, D: 94%, T: 94% 11/10/2011 - D: 96% For inf only, If Standard were 75%:, If 70%: Dist Seat Count: 962% Class fill with concurrent, D: 96%, T: 96% 11/05/2012-94% 10/08/2012-96% 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 3 of 13
Technology - Viability Instructional Support 4-4 Enrollment Trends Data by District/Site Seat count is increasing or is level, or, if decreasing, does not decrease more than 5 percent from the benchmark year (1st yr of the last 3 yrs, Fall, Spring, Summer) Seat counts for all the program-specific courses are added together to determine the seat count (For information only, appears the unduplicated number of students by academic year) (For information only, the measure is also calculated to include concurrent students) Source: Banner District />10% decrease See measure above TM />10% decrease 11/09/2012 - D: No, -22% Undupl 10: 58, 12: 48 Enrollment with concurrent, D: No, -22%, T: -22% Not - Critical 11/10/2011 - D:, 2% Undupl 09: 39, 11: 50 Enrollment with concurrent, D:, 2%, T:, 2% 11/09/2012 - No, -22% Not - Critical 10/23/2012 - T:, 2% Technology - Viability Instructional Support 5-5 Full-Time Faculty in Discipline At least 1 FT instructor whose primary teaching load is in the discipline (Sept 1- May 1 of latest academic year) (Cred Tran & Cred Occ versions of programs share the same results) Sources: Master Class 10/31/2012-02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 4 of 13
Schedule (Mainframe), Fac Employment Status (Mainframe) /No 11/10/2011 - Technology - Viability Instructional Support 6-6 Student Learning Outcomes for 2011-2012 Report For each 2-year cycle, has the program documented and implemented the recommendations for its active Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and completed its assessment process (which can include drafting new SLOs and selecting a method of assessment, conducting assessment, reviewing findings and making recommendations) for its active SLOs? Source: SLO Assessment Task Force; TracDat database (All fields must have data for applicable cycle?no blank fields) 11/07/2012-11/10/2011 - Technology - Quality Stakeholder Satisfaction/Progress 1-1 Student Satisfaction with Program Data by District/Site Percent of satisfaction, based on fall/spring percent of students satisfied with labs & technology for the last 3 years (Fall, Spring) (Each survey shall be scored 1 or 0 based on the combined average of the responses: Excellent: 1, Good: 1, Acceptable: 1, Weak: 0, Unacceptable = 0 Average of 1=Satisfaction) Source: Credit Student Faculty Evaluation District 80% 11/20/2012 - D: Lacks 3 yrs of data Not 11/10/2011 - Lacks 3 yrs of data Not 07/13/2012 - Maria Prospero Strategy/Results of : 08/14/2012 - Will request a copy of the forms filled out by students from the Institutional Research and review them with the students prior to graduation Emphasize the importance of 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 5 of 13
Strategy/Results of : completing these forms and submitting them back to the college See measure above TM 80% 11/20/2012 - Lacks 3 yrs of data Not 10/12/2012 - Lacks 3 yrs of data Not Technology - Quality Stakeholder Satisfaction/Progress 2-2 Student Evaluation of Faculty Data by District/Site Percent of satisfaction, based on fall/spring overall instructor performance averaged percent of student satisfaction with instructor overall performance for last 3 years, based on question: "Would you recommend instructor?" Source: Credit Student Faculty Evaluation District 80% 11/13/2012 - D: 93% 11/10/2011 - D: Lacks 3 yrs of data Not 07/13/2012 - Maria Prospero Strategy/Results of : 08/14/2012 - Replace current adjunct instructor with an instructor that has more experience in the function of interior and exterior space and has the capability of teaching students at different levels of design knowledge See measure above 11/13/2012-93% 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 6 of 13
TM 80% 11/13/2012 - Lacks 3 yrs of data Not Technology - Quality Stakeholder Satisfaction/Progress 3-3 Graduate Satisfaction with Program Percent of satisfaction, based on percent of cumulative fall, spring, & summer graduates satisfied with class availability, courses helped in Occupational Area, Technology, and Curriculum, for previous 3 years (Combined average of all four responses) Source: Graduate Survey completed during graduation ceremony rehearsal or by other means in consultation with the discipline, using data for most recent year for 2010-2011 report, two most recent years for 2011-2012 report, and three most recent years for and subsequent reports 80% 11/07/2012-95% 11/06/2012 - Deferred pending review N/A Technology - Quality Stakeholder Satisfaction/Progress 4-4 Employer Satisfaction Percent of employer satisfaction with EPCC graduates, based on no of employers responding to a survey and the no of employers satisfied with EPCC graduates for last 3 years Where applicable, the employers shall be surveyed from a list provided by the Dean/District-wide Coordinator (Each survey shall be scored 1 or 0 based on the combined average of the eight responses: Excellent = 1, Good = 1, Acceptable = 1, Weak = 0, Unacceptable = 0 An average of 1 indicates satisfaction) 11/10/2011-100% 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 7 of 13
Source:Employer Survey 80% Technology - Quality Stakeholder Satisfaction/Progress 5-5 Advisory Committee Satisfaction with Program Percent of satisfaction, based on the overall, averaged percent of satisfaction of each program advisory committee for the last 3 years (Each survey shall be scored 1 or 0 based on the combined average of the eleven responses: Excellent = 1, Good = 1, Acceptable = 1, Weak = 0, Unacceptable = 0 An average of 1 indicates satisfaction) When multiple programs are under the same advisory committee, the same data shall be applied to all the programs Source: Advisory Committee Survey & Minutes 80% 11/14/2012-98% 11/10/2011-98% Technology - Quality Stakeholder Satisfaction/Progress 6-6 Student Licensure/Certification, As Applicable Percent of graduates/completers receiving licensure/certification, based on annual pass rate for the most recent year Source: THECB Statewide Annual Licensure Report 90% 11/12/2012 - N/A N/A 11/12/2012 - N/A N/A Technology - Quality Instructional Support 1-1 Full-Time Faculty Development For most recent year, percent of FT teaching Faculty at 2 prof development activities during the fall semester (1st day of fall Faculty Development week through the last day of final exams) and percent of FT teaching Faculty at 2 prof development 11/16/2012-100% 11/10/2011-100% 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 8 of 13
activities during the spring semester (1st day of spring Faculty Development week through the last day of final exams) If FT faculty teach in 2 or more programs, their attendance is credited to all the programs Source: Faculty Development Records 100% Technology - Quality Instructional Support 2-2 Part-Time Faculty Development For most recent year, percent of PT teaching Faculty at 1 prof development activity during the fall semester (1st day of fall Faculty Development week through the last day of final exams) and percent of PT teaching Faculty at 1 prof development activity during the spring semester (1st day of spring Faculty Development week through the last day of final exams) If PT faculty teach in 2 or more programs, their attendance is credited to all the programs Source: Faculty Development Records 75% 11/16/2012-67% Not 11/10/2011-67% Not 07/13/2012 - Maria Prospero Strategy/Results of : 08/14/2012 - Review the importance of the epcc workshops and personal growth to each instructor Keep log on workshops attended per instructor Technology - Quality Instructional Support 3-3 Sections taught by Full-Time Faculty Data by District/Site Percent of sections taught by FT Faculty for last 3 years (Fall, Spring) Sources: Master Class Schedule (Mainframe), Fac Employment Status (Mainframe) District 60% 11/01/2012 - D: 64% 11/10/2011 - D: 68% 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 9 of 13
See measure above TM 60% 11/01/2012-64% 10/18/2012-68% Technology - Quality Instructional Support 4-4 Course Syllabus Reviewed/revised within the last 3 years, based on no of course syllabi in the program and the revision date of each syllabus Source: Course Syllabus (Curriculum Office) 10/30/2012-11/10/2011 - Technology - Quality Instructional Support 5-5 Advisory Committee Meetings Held at least once annually, based on the meeting date(s) of each program advisory committee for the last 3 years When multiple programs are under the same advisory committee, the same data shall be applied to all the programs Sources: Advisory Committee Survey & Minutes, Program Review Status Form completed by Dean of District Discipline Coordinator/CE Dean/Director 10/30/2012-11/10/2011-02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 10 of 13
Technology - Quality Instructional Support 6-6 DACUM Completion within last 5 years, based on the completion date of each program DACUM Source: DACUM Audit (Curriculum Office) 10/30/2012-11/10/2011 - Technology - Quality Instructional Support 7-7 DACUM findings Incorporated, as appropriate, into curriculum, based on the most recent DACUM Audit for each program Source: DACUM Audit (Curriculum Office) 10/30/2012-11/11/2011 - Technology - Quality Instructional Support 8-8 Secondary Articulation Agreements, as appropriate Percent of ISD requests for articulation addressed through analysis of EPCC course objectives for last 3 years Source: Tech Prep Office 100% 10/30/2012-100% 11/11/2011-100% Technology - Quality Instructional Support 9-9 Post-Secondary Articulation Agreements, as appropriate Written evidence of attempted or revised articulation within the last 3 years Source: Program Review Status Form completed by 10/30/2012 - No Not 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 11 of 13
Dean of District Discipline Coordinator/CE Dean/Director 11/11/2011 - Technology - Quality Instructional Support 10-10 Program Accreditation, As Applicable Maintains/actively seeking voluntary accreditation, based on documentation of accreditation or application for accreditation for last 3 years Source: Program Review Status Form completed by Dean of District Discipline Coordinator/CE Dean/Director 11/06/2012 - No Not 11/04/2012 - N/A N/A Technology - Quality Instructional Support 11-11 Community Benefit/Service Percent of advisory members acknowledging that the program is meeting community needs for each of the last 3 years, based on a survey of advisory members indicating the percentage of respondents acknowledging that the program is meeting community needs When multiple programs are under the same advisory committee, the same data shall be applied to all the programs Source: Advisory Committee Survey & Minutes 85% 11/14/2012-100% 11/11/2011-100% Technology - Quality Instructional Support 12-12 Program Need Percent of employers acknowledging that the program is needed for each of the last 3 years, based on a survey of employers 11/12/2012-100% 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 12 of 13
indicating the percentage of respondents acknowledging that each program is needed Where applicable, the employers shall be surveyed from a list provided by the Dean/District-wide Coordinator; the list shall be the same as that used for Credit Occupational Student Learning Indicator No 4: Employer Satisfaction Source: Employer Survey 85% 11/11/2011-100% Technology - Quality Instructional Support 13-13 Competitive Advantage: Quality Percent of respondents acknowledging EPCC meets/exceeds quality of proprietary schools for each of the last 3 years, based on a survey of the business community indicating the percentage of respondents acknowledging that each program's quality meets or exceeds that of proprietary schools Where applicable, the employers shall be surveyed from a list provided by the Dean/District-wide Coordinator; the list shall be the same as that used for Credit Occupational Student Learning Indicator No 4: Employer Satisfaction (Combined average of responses on both the Advisory Committee Survey and the Employer Survey) Source: Advisory Committee Survey & Minutes, Employer Survey 85% 11/14/2012-100% 11/11/2011-100% 02/04/2013 11:34 AM Generated by TracDat a product of Nuventive Page 13 of 13
INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS PROGRAM REVIEW DATA FOR VIABILITY INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT INDICATOR 1 - WORKFORCE DEMAND Measure: Whether the sum of new and replacement jobs in the field forecast for El Paso and Hudspeth Counties and the New Mexico counties of Dona Ana, Luna and Otero during the 5 years following the publication of the Program Review Report meets or exceeds the number of graduates during the 5 years preceding the publication of the report To ensure that the data include career paths addressed by the program, each program shall provide the IE Office with a list of jobs for which it prepares graduates Sources: Mainframe/State Lonestar, EMSI Database The listings are from the EMSI database, which was created in 2001, in consultation with the Association of Community College Trustees (ACCT), to track occupational demand and wages nationally, by state and by region, drawing on some 25 databases, which include those of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics The number after each occupation title is the unique Bureau of Labor Statistics SOC (Standard Occupational Classification) number assigned to each job title Job titles were specified by the disciplines Numerical anomalies may be due to rounding Interior Design Technology SOC Code Occupation TOTAL NUMBER OF JOBS PER YEAR 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total New/Replacement Jobs Average Hourly Wage (2010) Education Required 17-3019 Drafters, All Other 28 28 28 28 28 3 1785 Postsecondary vocational award 27-1025 Interior Designers 203 208 212 216 220 41 1638 Associate's degree 27-1026 Merchandise Displayers and Window Trimmers 176 178 180 181 183 29 1022 Moderate-term on-the-job training 41-2031 Retail Salespersons 17895 18140 18376 18594 18853 2895 1017 Short-term on-the-job training 41-3099 Sales Representatives, Services, All Other 1505 1542 1575 1597 1622 258 177 Work experience in a related occupation OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT rptemsi 5-YearForProgRevRpt1213 11/2/2012 Page 1 of 1 EPCC does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, gender, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity