NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Similar documents
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

12-month Enrollment

University of Arizona

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Raw Data Files Instructions

Best Colleges Main Survey

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning


Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

LIM College New York, NY

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Swarthmore College Common Data Set

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Shelters Elementary School

Peru State College Peru, NE

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Azusa Pacific University Azusa, CA

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Cooper Upper Elementary School

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

John F. Kennedy Middle School

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

University of Michigan - Flint Flint, MI

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

User Manual. Understanding ASQ and ASQ PLUS /ASQ PLUS Express and Planning Your Study

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Trends in College Pricing

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

BARUCH RANKINGS: *Named Standout Institution by the

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE. INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE (Excellence and Accountability)

Hokulani Elementary School

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Educational Attainment

A. General Information

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Kahului Elementary School

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Consumer Information Boot Camp

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

El Toro Elementary School

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

46 Children s Defense Fund

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Transportation Equity Analysis

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

Validation Requirements and Error Codes for Submitting Common Completion Metrics

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

HHS FALL FACULTY MEETING COLLEGE UPDATE

Communities in Schools of Virginia

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

WASHINGTON COLLEGE SAVINGS

6 Financial Aid Information

Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion

Engage Educate Empower

University of Wyoming Dashboard

Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

Transcription:

Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? What Is the Purpose of This Report? What Is in This Report? Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Avondale, AZ

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT COMPARISON GROUP 2

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT Bar Y scale chart titled with Percent. 1 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your American institution Indian 1. or Alaska Native. Item Group 2, 2, Comparison Asian. Group Median (N=2) 1. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 4. Group 3, Black or African American. Median (N=2). Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 8. Group 4, Hispanic/Latino. Median (N=2). Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 38. Group 5, Native Hawaiian or Median other (N=2) Pacific Islander. 12. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group.1. Group, White. Median (N=2).1. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group. Group 7, Two or more races. Median (N=2) 55. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 1. Group 8, Race/ethnicity unknown. Median (N=2) 2. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group. Group 9, Nonresident alien. Median (N=2) 7. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 1. Group 1, Women. Median (N=2) 1. 1, Your 1 Item 2, Comparison institution Group 1. Median (N=2) 57. Race/ethnicity Shape or gender 9 8 Percent 7 5 4 38 55 1 57 3 2 1 1 1 American Indian or Alaska Native 4 Asian 8 Black or African American 12 Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 1 2 7 White Two or more races Race/ethnicity unknown 1 1 Nonresident alien Women Race/ethnicity or gender Enrollment Horizontal Bar measure X scale titled Number chart with of students. 4 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Unduplicated institution 113. headcount - total. Item Group 2, 2, Comparison Total FTE enrollment. Group Median (N=2) 1275. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison institution Group 4184. Group 3, Full-time fall enrollment. Median (N=2) 479. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison institution Group 2459. Group 4, Part-time fall enrollment. Median (N=2) 27. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison institution Group 53. Median (N=2) 521. Shape Enrollment measure Level Horizontal of award X scale titled Bar Number chart with of awards. 4 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Associate's. Item 2, Comparison institution Group 525. Group 2, Certificates of at least Median 2 but (N=2) less than 445. 1,.1. 4 years. Item Group 2, 3, Comparison Certificates Group of at least Median 1 but (N=2) less than.1. 1, 352. 2 years. Item Group 2, 4, Comparison Certificates Group of less Median than 1 (N=2) year. 71. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 8. Median (N=2) 13. Shape Level of award Unduplicated headcount - total 11,3 12,75 Associate's 445 525 Total FTE enrollment 4,184 4,79 Certificates of at least 2 but less than 4 years Full-time fall enrollment 2,459 2,7 Certificates of at least 1 but less than 2 years 71 352 Part-time fall enrollment 5,21 5,3 Certificates of less than 1 year 8 13 2,5 5, 7,5 1, 12,5 15, Number of students 1 2 3 4 5 Number of awards 3

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT Academic Horizontal year X scale titled Bar Tuition chart with and 4 fees. groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your 21-11. Item 2, Comparison institution Group $1734. Group 2, 29-1. Median (N=25) $2157. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison institution Group $1734. Group 3, 28-9. Median (N=25) $1941. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison institution Group $1734. Group 4, 27-8. Median (N=25) $1729. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison institution Academic Group $159. Median (N=25) $1537. year Shape Comparison Group Median (N=25) Academic Horizontal year X scale titled Bar Net chart price. with 3 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your 29-1. Item 2, Comparison institution Group $7493. Group 2, 28-9. Median (N=2) $99. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $7811. Group 3, 27-8. Median (N=2) $7424. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $8458. Median (N=2) $958. Shape Academic year 21-11 $1,734 $2,157 29-1 $,99 $7,493 29-1 28-9 $1,734 $1,941 $1,734 $1,729 28-9 $7,424 $7,811 27-8 $1,59 $1,537 27-8 $,958 $8,458 $ $5 $1, $1,5 $2, $2,5 Tuition and fees Comparison Group Median (N=25) $ $2, $4, $, $8, $1, Net price Type Horizontal of aid X scale titled Bar Percent chart with of students. 8 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Any institution grant aid. Item 2, Comparison Group 4. Group 2, grants. Median (N=2) 51. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 49. Group 3, Pell grants. Median (N=2). Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 49. Group 4, State/local grants. Median (N=2). Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 4. Median Type Group 5, Institutional grants. (N=2). of aid Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 31. Group, Any loans. Median (N=2) 8. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 2. Group 7, loans. Median (N=2). Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 2. Group 8, Other loans. Median (N=2). Item 2, 1, Comparison Group.1. Median (N=2).1. Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Any grant Shape aid 51 4 Type Horizontal of aid X scale titled Bar Aid chart dollars. with 8 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Any institution grant aid $37. (N=2). Item Group 2, 2, Comparison grants Group (N=2). Median $43. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $4259. Group 3, Pell grants (N=2). Median $4288. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $4218. Group 4, State/local grants Median (N=2). $41. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $513. Group 5, Institutional grants Median (N=23). $189. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $1318. Group, Any loans (N=21). Median $128. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $334. Group 7, loans (N=21). Median $4815. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $327. Group 8, Other loans (N=3). Median $4815. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group No data. Median $4331. Shape Comparison Group Median ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Any grant Shape aid (N=2) Type of aid $3,937 $4,3 grants 49 grants (N=2) $4,259 $4,288 Pell grants 49 Pell grants (N=2) $4,218 $4,1 State/local grants 4 State/local grants (N=2) $513 $1,89 Institutional grants 8 31 Institutional grants (N=23) $1,318 $1,28 Any loans 2 Any loans (N=21) $3,34 $4,815 loans 2 loans (N=21) $3,27 $4,815 Other loans Other loans (N=3) $4,331 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 1 Percent of students $ $1, $2, $3, $4, $5, Aid dollars Comparison Group Median 4

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT Type Horizontal of aid X scale titled Bar Percent chart with of students. 3 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Any institution grant aid. Item 2, Comparison Group 41. Group 2, Pell grants. Median (N=2) 33. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 32. Group 3, loans. Median (N=2) 22. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 22. Median (N=2) 7. Shape Type of aid Type Horizontal of aid X scale titled Bar Aid chart dollars. with 3 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Any institution grant aid $317. (N=2). Item Group 2, 2, Comparison Pell grants Group (N=2). Median $3758. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $343. Group 3, loans (N=23). Median $3557. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $4559. Median $55. Shape Type of aid Comparison Group Median Any grant aid 33 41 Any grant aid (N=2) $3,17 $3,758 Pell grants 22 32 Pell grants (N=2) $3,43 $3,557 loans 7 22 loans (N=23) $4,559 $5,5 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 1 Percent of students $ $1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $, Aid dollars Comparison Group Median Measure Horizontal X scale titled Bar Percent. chart with 5 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Graduation institution rate, 14. overall (N=2). Item Group 2, 2, Comparison Transfer-out Group rate Median (N=25). 22. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 29. Group 3, Graduation rate cohort Median as 18. 1, 29. a percent of total entering students (N=25). Item Group 2, 4, Comparison Full-time retention Group Median rate (N=2). 1. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 59. Group 5, Part-time retention Median rate (N=2). 1. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 3. Median. Shape Comparison Group Median Measure Graduation rate, overall (N=2) Transfer-out rate (N=25) 14 18 22 29 Time Horizontal to program Bar chart completion X scale titled Graduation with 3 rate. groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Normal institution time. Item 2, Comparison Group 8. Group 2, 15% of normal time. Median (N=2) 9. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 19. Group 3, 2% of normal time. Median (N=2) 21. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 23. Median (N=2) 27. Shape Time to program completion 8 Normal time 9 Graduation rate cohort as a percent of total entering students (N=25) 1 29 15% of normal time 19 21 Full-time retention rate (N=2) Part-time retention rate (N=2) 3 59 1 2% of normal time 23 27 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 1 Percent Comparison Group Median 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 1 Graduation rate 5

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT Staff Horizontal category X scale titled Bar Number chart with of staff. 4 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Instruction/ institution research/ 182. public service. Item Group 2, 2, Comparison Executive/ Group administrative/ Median (N=2) managerial. 182. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 27. Group 3, Other professional Median (support/service). (N=2) 21. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 28. Group 4, Non-professional. Median (N=2) 18. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 91. Median (N=2) 123. Shape Instruction/ research/ public service Staff category 182 182 Academic Horizontal rank X scale titled Bar Average chart with salary. 7 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your All ranks institution (N=2). Item 2, Comparison Group $73371. Group 2, Professor (N=5). Median $. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group No data. Group 3, Associate professor Median (N=3). $55211. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group No data. Group 4, Assistant professor Median (N=3). $5154. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group No data. Group 5, Instructor (N=17). Median $48171. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group No data. Group, Lecturer (N=). Median $71732. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group No data. Group 7, No academic rank Median (N=8). No data. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison institution Group $73371. Median $5379. Shape Comparison Group Median Professor (N=5) Academic rank All ranks (N=2) $55,211 $, $73,371 Executive/ administrative/ managerial 27 21 Associate professor (N=3) Assistant professor (N=3) $51,54 $48,171 Other professional (support/service) 18 28 Instructor (N=17) $71,732 Non-professional 91 123 Lecturer (N=) No academic rank (N=8) $53,79 $73,371 5 1 15 2 Number of staff $ $2, $4, $, $8, Average salary Comparison Group Median Revenue Horizontal source X scale titled Bar Percent. chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Tuition institution and fees. Item 2, Comparison Group 17. Group 2, State appropriations. Median (N=2) 12. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group. Group 3, Local appropriations. Median (N=2) 31. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 5. Group 4, Government grants Median and contracts. (N=2) 13. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 2. Group 5, Private gifts, grants, Median and contracts. (N=2) 2. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group 1. Group, Investment return. Median (N=2) 1. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group.1. Group 7, Other core revenues. Median (N=2).1. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group.1. Median (N=2) 7. Shape Tuition and fees Revenue source 12 17 Expense Horizontal function X scale titled Bar Dollars chart with per FTE. 7 groups with 2 items per group. Group 1, 1, Your Instruction. Item 2, Comparison institution Group $3727. Group 2, Research. Median (N=2) $4491. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $.1. Group 3, Public service. Median (N=2) $.1. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $238. Group 4, Academic support. Median (N=2) $1. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $75. Group 5, Institutional support. Median (N=2) $7. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $119. Group, Student services. Median (N=2) $1188. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $17. Group 7, Other core expenses. Median (N=2) $93. Item 2, 1, Comparison Group $1343. Median (N=2) $152. Shape Instruction Expense function $3,727 $4,491 State appropriations 31 Research $ $ Local appropriations 13 5 Public service $238 $1 Government grants and contracts 2 2 Academic support $75 $7 Private gifts, grants, and contracts 1 1 Institutional support $1,19 $1,188 Investment return Student services $1,7 $93 Other core revenues 7 Other core expenses $1,343 $1,52 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 1 Percent $ $1, $2, $3, $4, $5, Dollars per FTE

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT METHODOLOGICAL NOTES Overview Use of Median Values for Comparison Group Missing Statistics Use of Imputed Data Data Confidentiality Disaggregation of Data by Race/Ethnicity Postbaccalaureate Degree Categories Cohort Determination for Reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates Description of Statistics Used in the Figures 7

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT Additional Methodological Information