MARTHA TURNER REILLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Similar documents
Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Shelters Elementary School

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Cooper Upper Elementary School

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

PEIMS Submission 3 list

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

University of Arizona

12-month Enrollment

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

African American Male Achievement Update

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

State of New Jersey

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Hokulani Elementary School

Financing Education In Minnesota

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools


EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Bellehaven Elementary

Best Colleges Main Survey

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Raw Data Files Instructions

Kahului Elementary School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

NCEO Technical Report 27

WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CUMULATIVE RECORD CHANGE CHANGE DATE: JULY 8, 2014 REVISED 11/10/2014

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Educational Attainment

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

A Pilot Study on Pearson s Interactive Science 2011 Program

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Fashion Design Program Articulation

TxEIS Secondary Grade Reporting Semester 2 & EOY Checklist for txgradebook

Guidelines for the Iowa Tests

School Action Plan: Template Overview

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

Attendance/ Data Clerk Manual.

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

For international students wishing to study Japanese language at the Japanese Language Education Center in Term 1 and/or Term 2, 2017

CIN-SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Transportation Equity Analysis

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

Clark Lane Middle School

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

LIM College New York, NY

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

6 Financial Aid Information

Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Bellevue University Admission Application

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Transcription:

Notice regarding TELPAS: Counts were incorrectly reported in previous versions of 27-8 data packets. Counts were doubled when reported, but percentages were not affected. Data Packet for 27-8 Planning Evaluation & Assessment Office of Institutional Research http://mydata.dallasisd.org OIR@dallasisd.org School Number 98 August, 27 MARTHA TURNER REILLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

27-8 Data Packet: Standard Issue Table of Contents 2. Contents...Table of Contents. Notes...Notes and Data Descriptions STUDENTS AND STAFF 6. Summary... Summary of Student and Teacher Statistics 7. Enroll ()...Enrollment Statistics by Ethnicity 8. Enroll (2)... Enrollment Statistics by Select Student Group 9. Attendance... Student Attendance Statistics. Teachers...Teacher Statistics STAAR. Reading (-8)... STAAR -8 Reading in English 6. Writing (-8)... STAAR -8 Writing in English 2. Math (-8)... STAAR -8 Mathematics in English 26. Science (-8)... STAAR -8 Science in English STAAR (SPANISH). Reading (-8)... STAAR -8 Reading in Spanish 6. Writing (-8)... STAAR -8 Writing in Spanish TERRANOVA/SUPERA. Compliance... SCE Compliance for At-Risk Students 2. Reading (TN)... TerraNova Reading Subtest. Language (TN).. TerraNova Language Subtest 6. Math (TN)...TerraNova Mathematics Subtest 8. Reading (SUP)... SUPERA Reading Subtest. Language (SUP) SUPERA Language Subtest ENGLISH PROFICIENCY 2. TELPAS...Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System. IPT...IDEA Proficiency Test LOCAL ASSESSMENT. ACP...Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance 2 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_contents 27-8 Data Packet

Notes Notes, Definitions, and Data Descriptions 26-7 SCHOOL SUMMARY Student percentages are computed as the percentage of total student enrollment. Additional statistics are available in ENROLLMENT and TEACHER reports. Race/ethnic categories are based on the latest federal standards for ethnicity and race reporting, though some categories have been combined due to small group sizes. Students reporting their ethnicity as are not counted in any race category. Teacher demographics and location assignments are from the district's Public ation Information Management System (PEIMS) submission to the TEA. ENROLLMENT Statistics are based on the school's enrollment at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period. New students were new to the district in 26-7. They are counted as new if not enrolled in a district campus before the last day of the -6 school year. The retention rate is the percentage of students in the same grade at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period for both -6 and 26-7. ATTENDANCE Statistics are based on student attendance through the end of the sixth six-weeks grading period (the end of the school year). Average daily membership is the total number of school days students were SCHEDULED or ENROLLED divided by the number of school days in the year. The average daily attendance number (N) is the total number of school days students were IN ATTENDANCE divided by the number of school days in the year. The average daily attendance percentage (%) is the average attendance rate. For each student, the number of days attended is divided by the number of days enrolled. This rate is then averaged across students. The number (N) of yearly transactions is the total number of transfer and withdrawal transactions in the school year. The percentage (%) is the number of transactions divided by average daily membership, which gives (on average) the percentage of the membership associated with a transaction. Continuously enrolled students are enrolled and in attendance for a minimum number of instructional days in at least one course at the school between the beginning of the school year and the first day of the main STAAR testing period. The minimum number varies depending on the school year's calendar. The stability rate is the number of continuously enrolled students divided by average daily membership. TEACHERS Teacher demographics and location assignments are from the district's Public ation Information Management System (PEIMS) submission to the TEA. Teacher absences counted towards the average do not include vacation days. Retention rate is the percentage of the prior year's teachers who continued at the school. The rate for a school year is computed with numerator # of teachers assigned to the school both that year and the prior year and denominator # of teachers assigned to the school for the prior year. Teachers from the prior year are not included in the statistic if they changed to non-teaching positions within the district. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_notes 27-8 Data Packet

Notes Notes, Definitions, and Data Descriptions STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC READINESS (STAAR) Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested. Student group assignments are from the district's Public ation Information Management System (PEIMS) submission to the TEA. STAAR statistics for years prior to 26-7 include results from all STAAR tests (STAAR, STAAR A, and STAAR L) for comparability to statistics beginning 26-7, when STAAR A and STAAR L were discontinued. Performance standard labels have changed. Approached Level is comparable to Level 2: Satisfactory (-6 standard). Met Level is equivalent to Level 2: Satisfactory (final standard). Mastered Level is equivalent to Level : Advanced. Statistics for a performance level (such as Percentage Approached Level ) include all scores at or above that level. Statistics by reporting category are averages for all students (across student groups and genders). Average percentage correct is computed as follows: For each student, divide number of items correctly answered by total number of items in test section, then average resulting percentages across all students. For short answers on EOC English tests, an average rating is presented; STAAR EOC short answers are rated on a scale of to. For written compositions on writing tests, average score points is presented. Additional details provided in report footnotes. in report is grade level of assessment, not student's grade level. For example, grade 7 students in Pre-AP math or science courses are assessed with the 8 Math or 8 Science assessment. These students' scores are reflected in the row for 8. Statistics for SSI grades and 8 are based on scores cumulative through students' second administrations. STATE COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (SCE) COMPLIANCE and TERRANOVA/SUPERA Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested. Student group assignments are based on demographic data in the Dallas ISD student database. The district changed norm-referenced tests in -6 to the TerraNova (English language) and SUPERA (Spanish language) assessments. Statistics in the SCE Compliance report are based on results from both TerraNova and SUPERA administrations. TELPAS Students are counted as having tested if any one of the four domains is rated. Because a TELPAS composite rating is not assigned to a student unless all four domains are rated, the number of TELPAS composite ratings may be smaller than the number tested. If a student's composite rating did not increase at least one level from 26 to 27, the TEA did not report the 26 composite rating. If a student is rated as advanced high in 27, the TEA does not differentiate between the advanced and advanced high levels from 26. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_notes 27-8 Data Packet

Notes Notes, Definitions, and Data Descriptions DALLAS ISD ASSESSMENTS OF COURSE PERFORMANCE (ACP) Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested. ACPs are semester exams administered in grades K-2. Not all courses have ACPs. In secondary grades, ACP scores account for a portion of students' semester grades (% at middle and % at high). Average course mark (no ACP) is computed from semester grades before factoring in ACP scores. In elementary grades, ACP results account for % of students' semester grades for core courses; course-grade statistics are not reported in packets for elementary grades. Raw scores on the ACPs (percentage of items correct) are scaled each year to maintain similar annual passing rates for the district. A scale score of at least 7% is required to pass an ACP. For grade levels with numeric grading, a course mark of at least 7% is required to pass a course. Statistics are computed separately for Semester and Semester 2 tests; time of administration during the school year is not relevant. Results from tests written for different school years are not combined. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_notes 27-8 Data Packet

Summary 26-7 Group Summary Statistics STUDENT ENROLLMENT Enrollment PK 6 KN 82 88 2 88 77 78 62 ALL Ethnicity/Race Black/ ican ican Indian/Alaska Native Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Multiple STUDENT AND TEACHER RACE/ETHNICITY Students Number Percent Number Percent 62... 8.6 2.9 2. Teachers.9 * * * * 6..6 8. Other* (teachers only) 2.8 Not reported (students only). *For teachers, Other category includes ican Indican/Alaska Native and Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. SELECT STUDENT GROUP ENROLLMENT Group Number Percent At-Risk 6. omically disadvantaged 9 8. Limited English proficient (LEP) 27. education 8. Talented and Gifted (TAG) 2 9.6 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_summary 27-8 Data Packet 6

Enroll () Enrollment Statistics by Race/Ethnicity ican ican Indian Asian Multiple category Enrollment N % N % N % N % N % N % PK KN 2 PK- 26 27 26 27 26 27 26 27 26 27 26 27 26 27 26 27 67 6 7..7 7.7...... 8 6 9 86.6 86.8 9.8. 7..... 2 2.7.. 77 7. 9.8. 87... 6 7.7 9.. 82 2.2.. 6 68.. 6. 82..2. 62 7.6 6 7. 2 2.... 7 7. 9 9. 2 2. 88.8.. 6 72.7 9.2 2 2. 92... 76 82.6 2.. 76 7... 6 7.7 6.6 2 2.6 88 7 9... 6 7.9.7. 7 8.7.. 6 8. 2 2.7. 6 6... 82 82.. 2 2. 77 7 9... 68 88... 7 7... 6 8.7 2 2.9. 7 7... 6 87... 78 6... 66 8.6 6 7.7. 7 7 62 7 6.8. 8....... 6 9 7 87.8 8. 9.9 2 2.7..... 62 9...2 62 82.2 6 6. 6. 6 9.6.2.2 79.9 7..8 62... 8.6 2.9 2. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_enroll_eth 27-8 Data Packet 7

Enroll (2) Enrollment Statistics by Select Student Group Enrollment omically antaged N % LEP ation At RIsk TAG N % N % N % N % New (to District) N % Gender % Male % Female Retention Rate (%) 67 7 8. 67.2. 67.2. 66 98. 7.8 2.2. PK 26 2 98. 2 6.. 2 6.. 2 98. 9..9.9 27 6 6 9.8 8 8. 6 9.2 9 6.. 6 98..8 6.2. 2 79 77. 2.2.9 7 6. 7 6.9 2. 7.8 2.2.9 KN 26 87 8 66.7.7 7 8. 7. 8 9.2 9 2.8.2 9.8.6 27 82 62 7.6 2 9. 7 8..2 6 7. 7. 6..9 2. 82 78 9. 6.9 8 9.8. 7 8. 2.6.9 6. 7. 26 8 8.... 9 9.. 62. 8.. 27 88 6 7.9 8.9 6 6.8 6 2. 2.6 8 9..9 9..7 92 8 88. 7.6 9 9.8 68 7.9 9 9.8.9..6 9.8 2 26 76 68 89.. 8. 6 7. 8. 8. 7. 2.6 2.6 27 88 7 8. 7 2. 9.2 6 2. 9.2 2.6 6.8.2 2. 7 7 9. 9 2. 2 2.7 9 6. 2 6. 7 9.. 6.7. 26 82 82... 7 7.. 9 9.. 7.. 27 77 68 88..9 7 9. 8. 8. 8... 6. 7 68 97. 8.6.7 7..7 6 8.6 8.6.. 26 7 6 9. 6. 6 8.6 62.9 8. 8. 7. 2.9. 27 78 7 89.7 7 6. 7 9. 6 7.8 8. 7 9. 7.7 2..8 7 69 9.2 6 62.2 8.8 6 7.7 8.8 6.8 2.7 7.. 26 7 66 9. 7. 7. 72.9.7 8..7.. 27 62 6 96.8.2.8 6. 9. 9. 6. 8.7.8 62 2 89..9 6 6. 6 6. 9.6 8 28..8 8.2.2 PK- 26 6 7 8. 28. 9 8.8 9. 9.9 2 22.. 8.9. 27 9 8. 27. 8. 6. 2 9.6 26.9 2.8 7.2.9 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_enroll_oth 27-8 Data Packet 8

Attendance Student Attendance Statistics Average Daily Membership Average Daily Attendance ly Transactions Continuously Enrolled Stability Rate N District N % District N District % N % District % N District % District,28 97 9. 2,67 9. 2 9.7 9.2 86,627 8.8 87. KN 26 88 2,8 8 96.,68 9. 9. 9. 8,88 92. 89. 27 8,88 77 96.,888 9.6.7 9.6 77,2 9.6 89.9 8,98 78 96.2,7 96. 2 2.8 8. 69 2, 8.8 88.7 26 2,97 99 97.2 2,877 96. 9 8.9 8. 9 2,66 9.6 9. 27 88 2,278 8 96.7,8 96.. 8. 8,69 96. 9. 92,96 89 96.,22 96. 7 8. 6.6 8 2, 86.6 89. 2 26 77,2 7 96.7,66 96.6 8. 6.6 7 2,286 9.7 9.8 27 8 2,98 8 96.7 2,76 96. 6. 6.9 77,8 9.2 9.6 7,27 72 97. 2,79 96.6 7. 6.2 68,9 9.7 9. 26 2,28 98 96.6 2,9 96.9 2.8. 92 2,26 9.6 9.7 27 78,8 7 96. 2,7 96.8 9.2.9 7 2,62 9. 92. 72 2,7 7 97. 2, 96.9 2 6.7 6.2 6,2 88.9 9. 26 7 2,688 69 97. 2, 96.9 7 9.9.8 69,676 97.2 92. 27 77 2,87 7 97. 2,67 96.8 9.. 7,9 9.9 92.9 76 2,22 7 96.,77 96.9 6 7.9 6.6 68,2 89.8 9.2 26 68 2,78 66 96.9,8 97...7 62,27 9.6 92. 27 6 2,22 6 97.,88 96.9 6 9.6 6. 9,67 9. 9. 97 79,286 79 96. 76,7 96. 89 7.9.6 7,967 87. 89. KN- 26 7 77,8 9 96.8 7,68 96. 7 9..2 67 7, 92. 9. 27 72 7,8 7 96.7 72,2 96. 6.8. 2 68,7 9.6 9.8 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_attendance 27-8 Data Packet 9

Teachers Teacher Statistics Teachers: 6 DISTRIBUTIONS Ethnicity/Race ican Multiple Other Gender Female Male 2- -6 26-7 Number 6 Number ATTENDANCE / RETENTION Average Absences.8 6.9 7. Percentage.9..6 8. 2.8 Percentage 9.7 8. Retention Rate 78. 68.6 7. YEARS EXPERIENCE s Beginning () 2 - - 6 - - 2 More than 2 Number 6 2 2 2 6 7 7 Percentage 8. 8. 6.7 8..6.6. More than 2 8.. 8. 9. 9. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_teacher 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (EN) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD *. 9.9 96. 88.9 9. *. 89. 9. 9. 26 88.9 * 8. 7. 7. 77.8 76. 6.. 82. 8. 27 * 8.7 9. 9. * * 66.7. 87. 92. 9. 9 * 7. 7. 7. * 7. 7. 67.9 8. 7..9 9 26 7. 87.9 8. *. 7. 8.8 9. 8. 62.6 27. * 7.9 7. * 9.9 6.2 76. 7. 7.6 6. * * 87. 86.8 * 8.7 8. 8. 9. 87. 7.6 8 26 * 2.9 82. 8.7 * 9. 72.7 76. 79.2 77.6 7.6 9 27 * 86.8 87. * 9. 8.2 8. 86. 8. 7.7 8 * 78.9 8. 82.9. 8. 8. * 82.9 87.9 8. 6. - 26 9.9 7.9 8.9 82..7 89.7 7. 7. 9. 8. 6.9 27. 7.6 8.6 8. 9. 87. 7.8 8.2 8.9 8. 62.7 8 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 9 7 8 82 8 26 9 6 2 9 7 77 6 27 7 7 8 6 66 76 62 8 22, 22,29 2,8 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_per_app 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (EN) Read (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 2 * 2 2 2,98 26 * 9 2 6 9 9, 27 * 2 * *, 9 * * 6 9 9,97 9 26 2 * 6 2,728 27 * 7 9 * 7 6,2 * * * 6 6 2, 8 26 * 7 6 * 2 9 6 2,29 9 27 * 7 6 * 6 6 9 2,269 8 * 7 9 6 6 * 7 2 8,82-26 8 6 2 9 9 2 6 26 8,6 27 6 8 6 6 2 22 8,66 8 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 9 7 8 82 8 26 9 6 2 9 7 77 6 27 7 7 8 6 66 76 62 8 22, 22,29 2,8 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_num_not_app 27-8 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 2.9 6.6.6. 8.9 * 7.8 7. 6. 26. 26 77.8 *.2.7 2.. 2..6 62. 8. 29.2 27 * 28.6 8.6. * * 22.2. 62..8 2.9 9 * 28.6 2.. * 7.6. 9. 2.9.8 27. 9 26 28.6 7.6. *.6..8 6.7.2 28.6 27. * 7.9. * 27. 2. 2..8 8.8 2. * *..7 * 2. 7.. 66.7.8 29.2 8 26 *. 8.7. * 7.6. 6..2.9 6. 9 27 * 62. 66.7 * 77. 6.2 8. 6.6 6. 8.2 8 *.6. 6.8. 9. 8.8 * 6..7 8.6 27.7-26 8.8 26. 9.. 7. 6.2 28..6.6 7.9. 27..2..7. 6.. 2.6 8...6 8 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 9 7 8 82 8 26 9 6 2 9 7 77 6 27 7 7 8 6 66 76 62 8 22, 22,29 2,8 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_per_met 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (EN) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 28.6. 28.6.. *.7 26..9. 26 66.7 * 2. 27.8.. 8. 26.9 7. 2..2 27 * 28.6.. * *. 26.7 7.. 2. 9 *. 22. 2. * 2.8 2..7 28.6 8. 2.2 9 26 28.6 8.2.7 *.. 9.2 2. 9.. 27 66.7 * 27.6. * 8.2... 6.6 6.9 * * 2. 2. * 2.8.6 6.7. 22.9.2 8 26 *. 2.6 2.8 * 28.6 8.2 6. 2. 2. 6.6 9 27 * 28. 29.2 * 8.7.6 27.8 27. 27.6 9. 8 *. 26. 22.. 2.6 6. * 22. 29. 2..2-26. 2. 22.6 22.. 7.9.8 2.8 28.6 2.. 27 7.. 29.7.6.. 2.2.6 2..9 8.8 8 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE - 9 7 8 82 8 26 9 6 2 9 7 77 6 27 7 7 8 6 66 76 62 8 22, 22,29 2,8 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_per_mst 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (EN) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY. Understanding Across Genres (GR -). Understanding/Analysis Across Genres (GR 6-8) 2. Understanding/Analysis of Literary Texts. Understanding/Analysis of Informational Texts 7.6 76.9 78.2 26 7.7 7. 6.8 27 82.6 7.6 7. 6. 7. 6. 26 78. 68.7 66. 27 7.7 7.2 6.2 67. 72. 72. 26 69.6 7.8 6.9 27 72.8 7. 7. 67.9 7. 7. - 26 7. 7.7 6.2 27 76. 7.8 7. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_obj 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (EN) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 7. 8. 8. * 7. 7. 7. 9. 79.6 7.9 9 26 * 7. 8.8 7. * 88.9 6.7 7. 86.7 78.6 7. 2 27. * 79. 76.7 * 8.8 68. 8. 87. 82.9. NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 7 2 2 28 2 9 26 7 9 7 27 2 27 6 29 9 2 6 7,2 7,29 7, August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_per_app 27-8 Data Packet 6

-8 (EN) Writing (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 2 8 9 * 6 8 8 2, 9 26 * 2 6 9 * 6 7 2 9,9 2 27 * 6 7 * 2 6 2 7, NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 7 2 2 28 2 9 26 7 9 7 27 2 27 6 29 9 2 6 7,2 7,29 7, August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_num_not_app 27-8 Data Packet 7

-8 (EN) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 2.9 27.. *. 6.7 2. 2.9.6 9. 9 26 * 2.9. 2.9 *.6 29.. 6.. 28.7 2 27. * 2. 2. * 27..8. 7. 9. 26. NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 7 2 2 28 2 9 26 7 9 7 27 2 27 6 29 9 2 6 7,2 7,29 7, August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_per_met 27-8 Data Packet 8

-8 (EN) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD *... *... 9... 9 26 * 28.6 2.2 22.9 * 22.2.8 8.. 2.8.9 2 27. *.. *.. 8. 8.8 2.2 7. NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 7 2 2 28 2 9 26 7 9 7 27 2 27 6 29 9 2 6 7,2 7,29 7, August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_per_mst 27-8 Data Packet 9

-8 (EN) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY. Composition¹ GR : Personal Narrative GR 7: Expository. Composition¹ GR : Expository GR 7: Personal Narrative 2. Revision. Editing.7. 67. 6.6 26. 69. 69.6 27. 66.8 68.8 ¹Average score points (range -8). A composition is rated tw ice on a scale of to, and the ratings are summed to determine score points for the composition. Score point scale: =Nonscorable; 2=Very Limited; =betw een Very Limited and Basic; =Basic; =betw een Basic and Satisfactory; 6=Satisfactory; 7=betw een Satisfactory and Accomplished; 8=Accomplished NOTE: Beginning in 26, only one composition w as required. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_obj 27-8 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Math () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD *. 87.7 89.7 * 87.2 8.7 * 9.9 8. 89. 6.8 7 26 7. * 9. 6.8 2. 2.7.6 2.8 7. 6.2 6. 98 27 * 8.7 77. 76.9 * 7. 66.7 76. 8. 78.9 7. 76 * 8.7 89.7 9. * 87. 89.8 9.2 88.2 89.7 6. 68 26 7. 9. 9.8 * 9. 88. 92. 9. 92.6 6. 68 27. * 66.7 67.7 28.6 68. 62. 6. 7.8 69.2 68. 78 * * 7. 67.2 2.9 68.2 62. 67.6 7. 69. 66. 72 26 * 8.7 89. 9.7 * 92. 88. 8.9 9.6 89.7 79.6 68 27 * 98.2 98. *. 97. 92.. 9. 8.6 6. 8.2 82. 8.. 8. 78.6 * 8. 8. 82.8 6. 2-26 76.9 7.7 78.8 77.7 29. 76. 7. 7.2 8.7 78.6 69. 2 27. 7.6 79.7 79. 7. 77. 7.8 76.9 8. 79.9 72.7 2 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 6 9 87 8 2 67 2 26 9 98 22 7 67 2 2 27 7 7 87 8 2 7 97 2 6,96 6,99 7,278 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_per_app 27-8 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Math (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 8 6 * 7 * 2 6 8,62 7 26 * 8 26 2 2 8,78 98 27 * * 2 8 8 6,8 76 * 6 * 7,897 68 26 2 * 2 2,6 68 27 * 22 2 2 6 8 2,6 78 * * 9 2 2 2 22,98 72 26 * 6 * 6 2 7 2,2 68 27 * * 2,8 6 6 2 * 7 2 7,7 2-26 2 2 7, 2 27 8 7 6 27 7 27 6,7 2 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 6 9 87 8 2 67 2 26 9 98 22 7 67 2 2 27 7 7 87 8 2 7 97 2 6,96 6,99 7,278 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_num_not_app 27-8 Data Packet 22

-8 (EN) Math () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 7... *.9.6 *. 8.9. 28.2 7 26 7. * 8. 8.. 2.7.9 2. 26.7 2. 2.6 98 27 * 2.9 8..6 *. 28.9 8.2 7. 8.7 9.9 76 *...8 * 2..9 2.9. 8. 22. 68 26 7. 8..7 * 2.8 8.8 6..2 8.8 28.9 68 27 8. * 2.2 2.. 29.8 2. 28.9. 29. 9. 78 * * 2.8...8 26.8 2...9. 72 26 * 28.6.6 8. *..2.2 8.6 7.. 68 27 * 6. 6. * 69.7 62. 6.8 9. 6. 2. 6 8. 6.8.6.7. 9.8.8 * 2.7..9 27. 2-26 76.9 7. 8. 8.6.8. 2.... 2. 2 27 8.7.2.9 2.2 2..8 6.9.6 8..8. 2 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 6 9 87 8 2 2 26 9 98 22 7 67 2 2 27 7 7 87 8 2 7 97 2 6,96 6,99 7,278 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_per_met 27-8 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Math () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 2.9 9.2 2. * 7.7 6. * 2..6. 9. 7 26. * 8.6 6.2. 7. 6.9...2 2. 98 27 * 2.9 22.7 2. * 7. 7.8.7.7 26. 9.9 76 *. 2.9 2.6 * 2. 2. 2. 2.6 22.. 68 26. 28. 26.2 * 27.8 2.. 2.7 27.9.6 68 27 66.7 * 2..8..9 2..6 2.2 7.9 22. 78 * *..8..9 2. 8. 2..9.8 72 26 *. 2.6 2. * 22. 9.2 9. 2.6 2.6.9 68 27 * 27. 26. *...2 8.2 28. 9. 6 6.7 2. 6. 7.2. 6.. * 7..2 6.. 2-26.8. 9.2 7.. 7.6. 2. 7. 8.8.6 2 27 7..2 2. 8.9 7. 2.8 9. 2. 26.8 2.8 2. 2 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE - 6 9 87 8 2 2 26 9 98 22 7 67 2 2 27 7 7 87 8 2 7 97 2 6,96 6,99 7,278 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_per_mst 27-8 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Math () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY. Numerical Representations and Relationships 2. Computations and Algebraic Relationships. Geometry and Measurement. Data Analysis and Personal Financial Literacy 7.2 6. 68. 68.9 26 66.2. 6.7.8 27 7.7 7. 6.8 67. 8.2 68. 9.9 7.2 26 88. 7. 6. 7. 27 72.2.7. 6. 6.8.9 62. 8. 26 7. 67.9 67.6 7.8 27 76. 7.2 76. 7.8 7.2 62.8 6.6 66.7-26 7.6 62. 62. 6. 27 72.9 66. 6. 68. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_obj 27-8 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Science () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * * 6. 6.7 2.9. 8.2. 7. 6. 7. 7 26 * 6.7 7. 7.9 * 79. 7. 7. 7. 7.6 66. 67 27 * 89. 88. * 87.9 87. 86.8 86. 86.7 6.9 6 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 2 6 6 7 7 7 26 6 7 8 9 7 67 27 2 8 22 6 9, 9,626 9,79 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_per_app 27-8 Data Packet 26

-8 (EN) Science (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * * 22 2 2 2 7 9 26 9 7 26 * * 8 9 9 26 67 27 * 6 6 * 8 28 6 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 2 6 6 7 7 7 26 6 7 8 9 7 67 27 2 8 22 6 9, 9,626 9,79 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_num_not_app 27-8 Data Packet 27

-8 (EN) Science () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * * 2.6 2.7. 2.9 6.. 29. 2. 2.8 7 26 *... *. 28.. 29.7 29.9 26.7 67 27 * 6. 8. * 6.6 7. 6.. 8.. 6 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 2 6 6 7 7 7 26 6 7 8 9 7 67 27 2 8 22 6 9, 9,626 9,79 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_per_met 27-8 Data Packet 28

-8 (EN) Science () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * *.8...7.6 8...2 6. 7 26 *... * 2.6 2.... 6.7 67 27 * 2.8 22. * 2.2 2. 2.7 8.2 2.7 2.8 6 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 2 6 6 7 7 7 26 6 7 8 9 7 67 27 2 8 22 6 9, 9,626 9,79 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_per_mst 27-8 Data Packet 29

-8 (EN) Science () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY. Matter and Energy 2. Force, Motion, and Energy. Earth and Space. Organisms and Environments 66.2 6.8 6. 6. 26 6.2 68. 6.9 7.7 27 7.9 7.6 78.8 72.8 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_obj 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 68.8 7. * 7. 7. 8. 8.8 68.8 66. 2 26 * 66. 62.2 * 6.2 66..6 76.2 6.6 66. 8 27 67.6 6.7 * 66.7 69. 7.9 77.8 67.6 66. 7 * 72.2 7. 7.7 7.7. 8.6 7.7 6.2 9 26 7. 7. * 7. 7. 76.9 6. 7. 6.2 27 27 67.6 68.6 * 66.7 67.6. 88.2 67.6 6.2 7 8. 82.6 * 82.6 8. 7. 88.2 8. 8. 2 26 * 88.9 88.9 89. 89. 66.7. 89. 79. 9 27 * * * * * * 87. 2 * 7. 76.8 * 76. 7.7 7. 76.6 7.7 7. 7-26 * 7.7 7. * 7.7 72. 6. 79.2 7. 68. 9 27 68. 68. * 67.6 69. 6. 82.9 68. 7. 76 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 7 69 72 7 28 7 7 26 2 92 9 92 9 6 8 9 27 76 72 7 7 76,99,879,762 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_per_app 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Read (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 8 * 8 9 7,922 2 26 * 6 7 * 6 6 2 7,9 8 27 2 2 * 2 8 2,887 7 * 2,867 9 26 8 8 * 8 8 8,97 27 27 2 * 2 2 2 2,8 7 * 2 2 669 2 26 * 2 2 2 2 2 2 876 9 27 * * * * * * 2 2 * 9 6 * 7 8 8 9,8 7-26 * 26 27 * 26 26 7 27,7 9 27 2 2 * 2 2 8 6 2,28 76 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 7 69 72 7 28 7 7 26 2 92 9 92 9 6 8 9 27 76 72 7 7 76,99,879,762 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_num_not_app 27-8 Data Packet 2

-8 (SP) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 7.. *. 8.7 6.7 29. 7.. 2 26 * 8..6 * 9. 8. 2.9 2. 7. 6.9 8 27 29.7 28.6 *.6.6 2. 8.9 29.7 9.2 7 *. 7..6.6..8.6 29.8 9 26.6.6 *.6.6.8 7..6. 27 27 27. 28.6 * 27.8 27...2 27. 6. 7. 2.2 * 7.8. 2.9 2.9. 9. 2 26 * 6..6 7.9 7.9. 6. 7.9. 9 27 * * * * * * 9. 2 *.. *.. 2.9 8.. 2. 7-26 * 7.8.6 * 7.8 7. 7. 6. 6.8 8.2 9 27 27.6 27.8 * 28. 28. 7.. 27.6.8 76 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 7 69 72 7 28 7 7 26 2 92 9 92 9 6 8 9 27 76 72 7 7 76,99,879,762 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_per_met 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 2. 26.7 * 26.7 2.8..8 2. 6. 2 26 *.9. *.2.9. 9..6 2. 8 27 2.6 2. * 22.2 22.2 2. 22.2 2.6 2. 7 *. 2.......6 9 26.. *.. 2. 2.9. 6.6 27 27 8. 8.6 * 8. 8.. 7.6 8. 7. 7 6.7 7. * 7. 6.7. 2. 6.7.9 2 26 *...6.6 6.7 8..6.6 9 27 * * * * * * 22.7 2 * 8.9 2. * 9. 8.9 2. 7. 8.7. 7-26 * 2.9 22.2 * 2.9 2.7.2. 2. 7. 9 27..9 *.9.7 9.8 2.. 2.9 76 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE - 7 69 72 7 28 7 7 26 2 92 9 92 9 6 8 9 27 76 72 7 7 76,99,879,762 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_per_mst 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY. Understanding Across Genres 2. Understanding/Analysis of Literary Texts. Understanding/Analysis of Informational Texts 6. 6. 62. 26 7..9 6.2 27 82.2. 6. 66. 66. 9. 26 66. 68.9 7. 27 2.7 6. 6. 6. 72. 9.8 26 67.9 7. 76. 27 * * * 6.9 6.9 6.7-26 68.6 62.6 68.8 27 67. 6. 6.9 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_obj 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 78.9 82. 8. 8. 8. 78.6 8. 67.9 2 26 88.9 88.9 * 88.9 88.9. 78.6 88.9 7.7 27 27 6.9 6.7 * 6.9 6.9. 88.2 6.9 7. 7 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 9 7 2 2 6 2 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 7 6 7 2 7 7,27,6,27 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_per_app 27-8 Data Packet 6

-8 (SP) Writing (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD *,68 2 26 *,9 27 27 2 * 2,8 7 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 9 7 2 2 6 2 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 7 6 7 2 7 7,27,6,27 7 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_num_not_app 27-8 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD * 2.6 8.8.. 6.7 7...2 2 26 6. 6. * 6. 6. 69.2 7. 6. 9. 27 27.2 2.9 *..2. 8.8.2. 7 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 9 7 2 2 6 2 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 7 6 7 2 7 7,27,6,27 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_per_met 27-8 Data Packet 8

-8 (SP) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD *..9... 7.. 7.2 2 26 7. 7. * 7. 7..8 2.9 7. 2.9 27 27.8 8.6 *..8. 7.6.8. 7 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 9 7 2 2 6 2 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 7 6 7 2 7 7,27,6,27 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_per_mst 27-8 Data Packet 9

-8 (SP) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY. Composition Personal Narrative¹. Composition Expository¹ 2. Revision. Editing.2. 8.9 8. 26.9 77.2 77.2 27. 6. 62.8 ¹Average score points (range -8). A STAAR composition is rated tw ice on a scale of to, and the ratings are summed to determine score points for the composition. Score point scale: =Nonscorable; 2=Very Limited; =betw een Very Limited and Basic; =Basic; =betw een Basic and Satisfactory; 6=Satisfactory; 7=betw een Satisfactory and Accomplished; 8=Accomplished NOTE: Beginning in 26, only one composition w as required. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_obj 27-8 Data Packet

Compliance State Compensatory ation (SCE) Compliance for At-Risk Students PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE on the TERRANOVA/SUPERA TERRANOVA/SUPERA READING At Risk Not At Risk All District At Risk Not At Risk All K 26 89. 87. 88. 8.2 87 K 26 8.9 68. 8. 27 9. 8. 8.7 8.7 77 27 6.7 7. 67.9 26 72. 66. 69. 7.9 26 2. 8.. 27 82.2 6. 7. 7.6 8 27.6 67. 6.2 TERRANOVA/SUPERA MATHEMATICS District 9. 88 9.7 78 2..2 8 2 K-2 26 7. 66.7 2.7. 7 2 26. 69.2. 27 6. 7.7 66.7. 8 27 6. 8.6 7. 26 69.2 72.9 7. 7. 262 K-2 26.9 6.6.2 27 76.9 7.8 7. 69.6 2 27 7.6 7.6 66. 6.8 7 7.7 8 6. 262 7.2 2 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 29 262 82 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 2 262 792 27 7 26 2,622 27 8 26 2,6 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_sce_compliance 27-8 Data Packet

TN Read () TerraNova Reading PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 26.. 7. 8.6 * * * 7. 9. 8.7 79. 2 27 9. 88.9 79.2 82.9 * * * 8.9 88.2 8. 77.8 8 26 77.8 6.2 7..2. * 2.. 66.7 7.6 66. 9 27. 6. 7. 6. * * 7. 2.9 69.2 6. 6. 2 K-2 26 * 6.2 82.6 6.9 * * * 66.7 68. 67. 6. 27 * 8. 79. 7.6 * * 7. 7. 78.9 7. 6. 7 26 82.6 6. 67.9 6.... 6. 7.9 68.8 68. 27 9. 67.6 7.8 72. 7. 77.8 7. 7.2 77. 7. 66. # Tested (GR K-2) 26 2 6 78 7 2 6 79 27 22 72 9 7 9 2 7 62 2,9 9,8 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_read perge 27-8 Data Packet 2

TN Read (2) TerraNova Reading NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 26 6 6 * * * 2 7 2, 2 27 6 8 * * * 8 22,99 8 26 2 9 8 * 9,6 9 27 6 7 * *,2 2 K-2 26 * 7 * * * 8 2, 27 * 2 9 * * 2 8 7,298 7 26 9 2 2 2 2 2, 27 9 2 29 26 2,79 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 2 6 78 7 2 6 79 27 22 72 9 7 9 2 7 62 2,9 9,8 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_read_2_nge8 27-8 Data Packet

TN Lang () TerraNova Language PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 26 88.9 6.. 7.7 * * * 7. 6.7 6.9 72.6 2 27 6. 66.7 8. 7. * * * 6. 8.8 62. 7.8 8 26 66.7.8 67.6. 22.2 *.. 7.8 8.6.2 8 27. 8. 7.. * * 28.6.7 6. 2. 8.9 2 K-2 26 * 6.2 7.9 62.2 * * *. 76. 6. 6.7 27 *.7 69..9 * * 6. 6.7 68. 6.8 6.9 7 26 7.9. 6.9 8. 29. 22.2 6.8.7 67. 6..8 27 8.8 7. 9.7.2 2.9.6 7.6 7. 62.9 6..8 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 2 6 77 7 9 9 6 79 27 22 72 9 7 9 2 7 62 2,7 9,76 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_lang perge 27-8 Data Packet

TN Lang (2) TerraNova Language NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 26 2 2 * * * 8 9,8 2 27 * * * 8 2,8 8 26 2 7 * 6 9 7 8 27 * * 2 72 2 K-2 26 * 2 9 * * * 977 27 * 2 8 * * 7 7 98 7 26 7 8 8 2 8 2,29 27 8 2 2 6 2 28, # Tested (GR K-2) 26 2 6 77 7 9 9 6 79 27 22 72 9 7 9 2 7 62 2,7 9,76 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_lang_2_nge8 27-8 Data Packet

TN Math () TerraNova Mathematics PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 26 9. 7..8.8 * 6.7 8.9. 6. 8. 9. 88 27 6.6 6. 67. 6. *.2 6.7 6.9 7.6 67.9 9.7 78 26 88.9 2. 8. 6.8..2 2..9 6.. 2.2 27. 6.2 9..8 *.8.6.6 6. 6.2. 8 2 K-2 26 * 8. 7... 2.. 8.6 6.. 6.9 7 27 * 7. 66.7 67.2 *.9 6. 78.7 8.8 7. 7.9 8 26 8..7.. 26...9 7.7 6.8.2 6. 262 27 8. 6. 6.2 62.6 66.7.7 7.6 67.7 6. 66. 7. 2 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 2 6 9 2 9 22 2 2 262 27 2 76 87 9 6 8 27 7 2 7,78,282 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_math perge 27-8 Data Packet 6

TN Math (2) TerraNova Mathematics NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 26 7 * 7 7 7 8 2, 88 27 8 9 * 9,868 78 26 7 6 8,9 27 6 9 * 7 7,67 8 2 K-2 26 * 2 6 7 2 2 6 9 2,67 7 27 * * 9 2, 8 26 9 6 2 2 2,8 262 27 2 2 27 2 9 2,86 2 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 2 6 9 2 9 22 2 2 262 27 2 76 87 9 6 8 27 7 2 7,78,282 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_math_2_nge8 27-8 Data Packet 7

SUP Read () SUPERA Reading PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 26 * 9.9 9.8 * 9. 9. 9.8 8.7 9. 87. 27 * * 8.2 9.9 * 92. 92. 66.7. 86.2 8.8 29 26 8. 87.2 8. 8. 8. 9. 8.7 87.2 2 27 * 88. 86. * 86.8 86.8 8.8 9. 86.7 87.7 2 K-2 26 2.. *.. 2. 2.9 2.. 27.9 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.9..9 6.9 26 * 7. 7. * 7. 7. 72. 76. 7.7 72.7 8 27 * * 76.7 77.2 * 78. 78. 69.8 8.6 76.9 7.2 8 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 6 2 68 8 27 92 2 96 96 8 7, 6,2 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_s_read perge 27-8 Data Packet 8

SUP Read (2) SUPERA Reading NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 26 * 22 * 2 2 2 2,69 27 * * * 6 9,98 29 26 6 6 6 6 6 6 2,97 2 27 * 2 * 2 2 6 8 2,8 2 K-2 26 * 27 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 26 * 9 * 7 7 22 8 6, 8 27 * * 27 * 28 28 2 9,96 8 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 6 2 68 8 27 92 2 96 96 8 7, 6,2 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_s_read_2_nge8 27-8 Data Packet 9

SUP Lang () SUPERA Language PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 26 * 8. 8. * 8. 8. 8. 8.7 8. 8. 27 * * 8.2 86. * 88. 88. 7. 9. 86.2 8. 29 26 7.7 7.8 7.7 7.7 7. 7. 7. 69. 2 27 * 69. 67.6 * 6.8 6.8. 9. 7. 69. 2 K-2 26 2.. *.. 29..7 2. 8.6 27.2 2. 2. 2..6..2 2. 26 * 6. 6. * 6.6 6. 6.7 68. 66. 6.2 8 27 * * 6. 6. * 6. 6. 9. 8.8 6.7 6.7 8 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 6 2 68 8 27 92 2 96 96 8 7,29 6,2 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_s_lang perge 27-8 Data Packet

SUP Lang (2) SUPERA Reading NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 26 * 9 * 7 7 9 2 2, 27 * * * 2 2 2,6 29 26 8 8 8 8 8, 2 27 * * 2 2 2 2 97 2 K-2 26 * 62 27 2 6 26 * 28 2 * 26 26 29,7 8 27 * * 9 * 8 8 6,66 8 # Tested (GR K-2) 26 6 2 68 8 27 92 2 96 96 8 7,29 6,2 August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_s_lang_2_nge8 27-8 Data Packet

TELPAS 2 Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System 26-7 Domain: Listening PERFORMANCE IN 27 Speaking Writing Reading Composite Number Rated Both s (N Rated) 27 Level N % N % N % N % N % N (%) Progressed 27 Level PROGRESSION FROM 26 TO 27 Beg 26 Level Int Adv Adv High Beginning 6. 6. 2 78. 9 6. 9 6. Beginning KN Intermediate 2. 8 2. 6 8.8 6 9. 7 22.6 Intermediate (2) Advanced. 6 8.8. 6. 2.9 Advanced Advanced High 2 6. 2 6...2.2 Advanced High Beginning 2.7 9. 79. 28 6. 7 9. Beginning Intermediate.2 2.6 7..6 7 9. 7 Intermediate () Advanced 2.6.2 6. 2. 9 2.9 (2.9%) Advanced Advanced High 2.6.9... Advanced High Beginning.8 9 2. 7.9 7 8.9 6 6.2 Beginning 2 Intermediate. 27. 7.8 8 2.6 7.8 Intermediate 2 (7) Advanced. 7.8 6 6.2 7.8. 27 (8.8%) Advanced Advanced High..8. 8 2.6.8 Advanced High 2 Beginning. 2. 2.. 2. Beginning Intermediate 2. 7 2. 2 6. 6. 7 2. 9 Intermediate 8 8 () Advanced 26 6. 2. 27. 2. 7. 26 (66.7%) Advanced Advanced High 9 22. 9 22.. 8 2. 7 7. Advanced High 7 Beginning 2. 2. 6. 8. 2. Beginning Intermediate 8 7. 29.8 7 7. 6. 2.6 Intermediate 2 (7) Advanced 2. 7 6.2 2.6 9. 9. (.%) Advanced 2 7 Advanced High 29.8.9 2.9 8 7. 2.7 Advanced High August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_telpas 27-8 Data Packet 2

TELPAS 2 Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System 26-7 Domain: Listening PERFORMANCE IN 27 Speaking Writing Reading Composite Number Rated Both s (N Rated) 27 Level N % N % N % N % N % N (%) Progressed 27 Level PROGRESSION FROM 26 TO 27 Beg 26 Level Int Adv Adv High Beginning..... Beginning Intermediate. 2. 2 6. 2 6.. 2 Intermediate () Advanced 9. 2. 7.. 9 27. 26 (8.%) Advanced Advanced High 9.9 2 7.8 2. 2 6.6 2 69.7 Advanced High 2 Beginning 2 9.9. 8.6 62 26.8 9.6 Beginning ALL Intermediate 8. 6 27.6 66 28.6 22.9 7.9 6 Intermediate 26 22 (22) Advanced 92 9.7 67 28.9 6 2.2 7. 69. 97 (62.2%) Advanced 27 27 Advanced High 7.9 7.2 29 2.6 6 9.9 9.6 Advanced High 2 Indicates students w ho progressed at least one level from 26 to 27. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_telpas 27-8 Data Packet

IPT IDEA Proficiency Test PERCENTAGE BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL Level Level 2 Level Level Level Level 6 Number N % N % N % N % Tested N % N % PK * * * * * * * * KN 28 7 2. 9 2. 7 2. * * * * * * 76.9 * * 2 * * * * 2 * * * * ALL 9 7 2.2 * * 2 7.8.7.7 26 27. * * 8 8. 28 29. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_ipt 27-8 Data Packet

ACP Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance SEMESTER TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing SEMESTER 2 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Elementary School Exams KINDERGARTEN MATHEMATICS 8 8.7 87. 9. 8.6 KINDERGARTEN READING KINDERGARTEN MATHEMATICS KINDERGARTEN READING 87. 9. 96. 92.8 KINDERGARTEN READING SPANISH KINDERGARTEN READING SPANISH 29 8. 88. 9. 9. GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE MATHEMATICS 8 8. 86.8 89. 82.8 GRADE READING GRADE READING 8. 8.9 92. 9. GRADE READING SPANISH GRADE READING SPANISH 87.9 87.9. 9. GRADE 2 MATHEMATICS 8 78. 8. 8. 87. 9. 8.7 9.6 GRADE 2 READING 9 77.2 8.8 8. 87.8 9.9 77. 89. GRADE 2 READING SPANISH GRADE 2 MATHEMATICS GRADE 2 READING GRADE 2 READING SPANISH 8. 8. 88.7 82.9. 79.9 9.2 GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE MATHEMATICS 7 6. 76.7 82.6 68.9 98.6 6.9 88. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_acp 27-8 Data Packet

ACP Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance SEMESTER TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing SEMESTER 2 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course GRADE READING 7 7. 82.7 8.9 9.9 97. 6. 8.8 GRADE READING SPANISH 7 6. 7.9 78.6. 89.2 9.9 88.7 GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS GRADE READING GRADE READING SPANISH GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS 6 7. 78.8 8. 8. 9. 8. 9. GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS SPANISH GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS SPANISH 76. 76. 8.2 7.6. 67.8 9.2 GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE MATHEMATICS 7 6. 7.6 8. 7. 98.6 6.7 9. GRADE READING GRADE READING 6 7. 8.6 82. 88.9 97.2 68. 9. GRADE READING SPANISH GRADE READING SPANISH 62.6 7. 8.2 7.. 7.8 9.2 GRADE MATHEMATICS 62 68.7 79. 79.2 82. 9.9 6. 9.2 GRADE READING 62 7.7 8.7 82. 9. 96.8 7.8 9.8 GRADE SCIENCE GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE READING GRADE SCIENCE 62 8.2 8.2 79.6 88.7 9.9 67.9 9. August, 27 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_acp 27-8 Data Packet 6