WILMER-HUTCHINS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Similar documents
Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Shelters Elementary School

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Cooper Upper Elementary School

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

PEIMS Submission 3 list

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

University of Arizona

12-month Enrollment

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

African American Male Achievement Update

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

State of New Jersey

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Hokulani Elementary School

Financing Education In Minnesota


BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Bellehaven Elementary

Best Colleges Main Survey

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Raw Data Files Instructions

Kahului Elementary School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

NCEO Technical Report 27

WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CUMULATIVE RECORD CHANGE CHANGE DATE: JULY 8, 2014 REVISED 11/10/2014

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Educational Attainment

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

A Pilot Study on Pearson s Interactive Science 2011 Program

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Fashion Design Program Articulation

TxEIS Secondary Grade Reporting Semester 2 & EOY Checklist for txgradebook

School Action Plan: Template Overview

Guidelines for the Iowa Tests

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

Attendance/ Data Clerk Manual.

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

For international students wishing to study Japanese language at the Japanese Language Education Center in Term 1 and/or Term 2, 2017

CIN-SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Transportation Equity Analysis

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

Clark Lane Middle School

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

LIM College New York, NY

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

6 Financial Aid Information

Bellevue University Admission Application

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Transcription:

Notice regarding TELPAS: Counts were incorrectly reported in previous versions of 17-18 data packets. Counts were doubled when reported, but percentages were not affected. Data Packet for 17-18 Planning Evaluation & Assessment Office of Institutional Research http://mydata.dallasisd.org OIR@dallasisd.org School Number 31 August 15, 17 WILMER-HUTCHINS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

17-18 Data Packet: Standard Issue 1 Table of Contents. Contents...Table of Contents 3. Notes...Notes and Data Descriptions STUDENTS AND STAFF 6. Summary... Summary of Student and Teacher Statistics 7. Enroll (1)...Enrollment Statistics by Ethnicity 8. Enroll ()... Enrollment Statistics by Select Student Group 9. Attendance... Student Attendance Statistics 1. Teachers...Teacher Statistics STAAR 11. Reading (3-8)... STAAR 3-8 Reading in English 16. Writing (3-8)... STAAR 3-8 Writing in English 1. Math (3-8)... STAAR 3-8 Mathematics in English 6. Science (3-8)... STAAR 3-8 Science in English STAAR (SPANISH) 31. Reading (3-8)... STAAR 3-8 Reading in Spanish 36. Writing (3-8)... STAAR 3-8 Writing in Spanish TERRANOVA/SUPERA 1. Compliance... SCE Compliance for At-Risk Students. Reading (TN)... TerraNova Reading Subtest. Language (TN).. TerraNova Language Subtest 6. Math (TN)...TerraNova Mathematics Subtest 8. Reading (SUP)... SUPERA Reading Subtest 5. Language (SUP) SUPERA Language Subtest ENGLISH PROFICIENCY 5. TELPAS...Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System 5. IPT...IDEA Proficiency Test LOCAL ASSESSMENT 55. ACP...Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_contents 17-18 Data Packet

3 Notes Notes, Definitions, and Data Descriptions 16-17 SCHOOL SUMMARY Student percentages are computed as the percentage of total student enrollment. Additional statistics are available in ENROLLMENT and TEACHER reports. Race/ethnic categories are based on the latest federal standards for ethnicity and race reporting, though some categories have been combined due to small group sizes. Students reporting their ethnicity as are not counted in any race category. Teacher demographics and location assignments are from the district's Public ation Information Management System (PEIMS) submission to the TEA. ENROLLMENT Statistics are based on the school's enrollment at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period. New students were new to the district in 16-17. They are counted as new if not enrolled in a district campus before the last day of the -16 school year. The retention rate is the percentage of students in the same grade at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period for both -16 and 16-17. ATTENDANCE Statistics are based on student attendance through the end of the sixth six-weeks grading period (the end of the school year). Average daily membership is the total number of school days students were SCHEDULED or ENROLLED divided by the number of school days in the year. The average daily attendance number (N) is the total number of school days students were IN ATTENDANCE divided by the number of school days in the year. The average daily attendance percentage (%) is the average attendance rate. For each student, the number of days attended is divided by the number of days enrolled. This rate is then averaged across students. The number (N) of yearly transactions is the total number of transfer and withdrawal transactions in the school year. The percentage (%) is the number of transactions divided by average daily membership, which gives (on average) the percentage of the membership associated with a transaction. Continuously enrolled students are enrolled and in attendance for a minimum number of instructional days in at least one course at the school between the beginning of the school year and the first day of the main STAAR testing period. The minimum number varies depending on the school year's calendar. The stability rate is the number of continuously enrolled students divided by average daily membership. TEACHERS Teacher demographics and location assignments are from the district's Public ation Information Management System (PEIMS) submission to the TEA. Teacher absences counted towards the average do not include vacation days. Retention rate is the percentage of the prior year's teachers who continued at the school. The rate for a school year is computed with numerator # of teachers assigned to the school both that year and the prior year and denominator # of teachers assigned to the school for the prior year. Teachers from the prior year are not included in the statistic if they changed to non-teaching positions within the district. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_notes 17-18 Data Packet 3

3 Notes Notes, Definitions, and Data Descriptions STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC READINESS (STAAR) Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested. Student group assignments are from the district's Public ation Information Management System (PEIMS) submission to the TEA. STAAR statistics for years prior to 16-17 include results from all STAAR tests (STAAR, STAAR A, and STAAR L) for comparability to statistics beginning 16-17, when STAAR A and STAAR L were discontinued. Performance standard labels have changed. Approached Level is comparable to Level : Satisfactory (-16 standard). Met Level is equivalent to Level : Satisfactory (final standard). Mastered Level is equivalent to Level 3: Advanced. Statistics for a performance level (such as Percentage Approached Level ) include all scores at or above that level. Statistics by reporting category are averages for all students (across student groups and genders). Average percentage correct is computed as follows: For each student, divide number of items correctly answered by total number of items in test section, then average resulting percentages across all students. For short answers on EOC English tests, an average rating is presented; STAAR EOC short answers are rated on a scale of to 3. For written compositions on writing tests, average score points is presented. Additional details provided in report footnotes. in report is grade level of assessment, not student's grade level. For example, grade 7 students in Pre-AP math or science courses are assessed with the 8 Math or 8 Science assessment. These students' scores are reflected in the row for 8. Statistics for SSI grades 5 and 8 are based on scores cumulative through students' second administrations. STATE COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (SCE) COMPLIANCE and TERRANOVA/SUPERA Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested. Student group assignments are based on demographic data in the Dallas ISD student database. The district changed norm-referenced tests in -16 to the TerraNova (English language) and SUPERA (Spanish language) assessments. Statistics in the SCE Compliance report are based on results from both TerraNova and SUPERA administrations. TELPAS Students are counted as having tested if any one of the four domains is rated. Because a TELPAS composite rating is not assigned to a student unless all four domains are rated, the number of TELPAS composite ratings may be smaller than the number tested. If a student's composite rating did not increase at least one level from 16 to 17, the TEA did not report the 16 composite rating. If a student is rated as advanced high in 17, the TEA does not differentiate between the advanced and advanced high levels from 16. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_notes 17-18 Data Packet

3 Notes Notes, Definitions, and Data Descriptions DALLAS ISD ASSESSMENTS OF COURSE PERFORMANCE (ACP) Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested. ACPs are semester exams administered in grades K-1. Not all courses have ACPs. In secondary grades, ACP scores account for a portion of students' semester grades (1% at middle and 15% at high). Average course mark (no ACP) is computed from semester grades before factoring in ACP scores. In elementary grades, ACP results account for 5% of students' semester grades for core courses; course-grade statistics are not reported in packets for elementary grades. Raw scores on the ACPs (percentage of items correct) are scaled each year to maintain similar annual passing rates for the district. A scale score of at least 7% is required to pass an ACP. For grade levels with numeric grading, a course mark of at least 7% is required to pass a course. Statistics are computed separately for Semester 1 and Semester tests; time of administration during the school year is not relevant. Results from tests written for different school years are not combined. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_notes 17-18 Data Packet 5

Summary 16-17 Group Summary Statistics STUDENT ENROLLMENT Enrollment PK 76 KN 13 1 1 16 3 181 16 5 179 ALL 1,16 Ethnicity/Race Black/ ican ican Indian/Alaska Native Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Multiple STUDENT AND TEACHER RACE/ETHNICITY Students Number Percent Number Percent 88 8.3 3.3 5.5 685 67. 8.8 7.7 Teachers 8 6.7 * * * *. 8 13.3. Other* (teachers only). Not reported (students only). *For teachers, Other category includes ican Indican/Alaska Native and Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. SELECT STUDENT GROUP ENROLLMENT Group Number Percent At-Risk 61 59. omically disadvantaged 89 83.6 Limited English proficient (LEP) 71 6. education 69 6.8 Talented and Gifted (TAG) 87 8.6 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_summary 17-18 Data Packet 6

Enroll (1) Enrollment Statistics by Race/Ethnicity ican ican Indian Asian Multiple category Enrollment N % N % N % N % N % N % PK KN 1 3 5 PK-5 16 17 16 17 16 17 16 17 16 17 16 17 16 17 16 17 7 81 76 8 16 15 17. 19.8 19.7...... 37 65 57 78.7 8. 75..3. 5.3... 1 3 3.3.. 9 66. 5 3.5. 13 7 35.6.. 78 59.1 3. 3.3 13 3... 97 73.5 1.5 1.8 17 5 6.5 1. 1. 11 67.1 5.9 1. 19 39 6... 1 69.8 5 3. 1.7 1 5 31.7.. 9 63. 5 3.5 1. 19 51 3. 1.7 1.3 93 6. 1.3. 177 51 8.8 1.1.3 116 65.5 3 1.7 1.6 16 5... 11 7. 7. 1.6 18 6 3.6. 1.5 11 6. 9.9. 13 31.3 1.7. 89 66. 1.5. 181 51 8. 1.1. 119 65.7 3 1.7 1.1 17 57 33.1. 1.6 1 6.5 7.1 3 1.7 175 5 3.9. 1.6 113 6.6 6 3. 1.6 16 9 33.6 1.7. 9 6. 1.. 18 16 179 5 57 56 36.5 3.8 31.3... 1 1..6.6 87 1 116 58.8 61. 6.8 7 5.7..8 1. 1..6 1,1 318 31. 3.3 6.6 63 63.5 37 3.7 5.5 1,1 36 3. 3.3 6.6 665 65.7. 8.8 1,16 88 8.3 3.3 5.5 685 67. 8.8 7.7 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_enroll_eth 17-18 Data Packet 7

Enroll () Enrollment Statistics by Select Student Group Enrollment omically antaged N % LEP ation At RIsk TAG N % N % N % N % New (to District) N % Gender % Male % Female Retention Rate (%) 7 7 1. 51.1.3 5 53.. 7 1. 6.8 53.. PK 16 81 81 1. 7 58. 1 1. 7 58.. 81 1. 59.3.7. 17 76 73 96.1 57.9.6 57.9. 75 98.7 5.6 7. 1.3 1 133 93.7 59 1.5 3.1 76 53.5 3.1 76 53.5 8.6 51.. KN 16 13 17 96. 61 6. 6.5 73 55.3 3. 76 57.6 7. 53..8 17 13 99 75. 68 51.5 3. 7 5.5 3. 5 3.1 7.7 5.3 1.5 17 167 98. 66 38.8 1 8. 8 7.1 6 15.3 3 13.5 55.3.7 1. 1 16 19 135 9.6 7 7. 1.3 81 5. 1 9. 3 15. 5.6 5.. 17 1 9 66. 66 6.5 1 9.9 7 9.3 9 6.3 5 17.6. 55.6 1. 19 18 99.3 61.9 5 3. 115 77. 1 1.1 13. 53.7 6.3. 16 177 17 98.3 75. 1 6.8 89 5.3 1. 11.3 57.1.9.5 17 16 13 8.5 77 8.1 8 5. 8 5. 11 6.9 7 16.9 9. 5.6.5 18 177 96. 69 37.5 11 6. 13 7.7 3 1.5 9 15.8 56.. 1.1 3 16 13 13 1. 58 3.3 5 3.7 1 7.6 18 13. 1 1. 7.8 5.. 17 181 159 87.8 77.5 19 1.5 86 7.5 1. 1 11.6 59.1.9.6 17 166 96.5 57 33.1 13 7.6 116 67. 19 11. 3 19.8 9. 5.6.6 16 175 166 9.9 7. 1 5.7 17 7.6 13.7 16 9.1 51. 8.6.6 17 16 19 88. 6.5 1 6.8 18 7. 18 1.3 15 1.3 5.7 7.3.1 18 16 98.6 56 37.8 1 9.5 1 81.1 18 1. 6 17.6 57..6. 5 16 16 158 96.3 57 3.8 17 1. 19 78.7 19 11.6 3 1. 51. 8.8.6 17 179 163 91.1 77 3. 1 6.7 11 78.8 3 1.8 1 7.8 5.5 7.5.6 1,1 98 97. 39 38.7 6 6.1 66 65. 11 1.9 55 5. 53. 6.8 1.1 PK-5 16 1,1 975 96.3 38 3.3 53 5. 66 63.8 11 1. 53 5. 51.1 8.9 1.7 17 1,16 89 83.6 71 6. 69 6.8 61 59. 87 8.6 1.9 51.5 8.5 1. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_enroll_oth 17-18 Data Packet 8

Attendance Student Attendance Statistics Average Daily Membership Average Daily Attendance ly Transactions Continuously Enrolled Stability Rate N District N % District N District % N % District % N District % District 13 13,83 18 95.6 1,675 95. 7 35.1 19. 18 11,67 8.5 87.5 KN 16 17 1,185 1 95.9 11,638 95.5 8.1 19.3 116 1,883 91. 89.3 17 18 11,388 13 95.7 1,888 95.6 31. 19.6 11 1, 87.5 89.9 166 13,98 159 95.7 13,37 96.1 8 8.9 18.1 1 1,5 85.5 88.7 1 16 15 13,397 15 96.8 1,877 96.1 6 17.3 18.1 135 1,66 9. 9.1 17 139 1,78 13 96.1 11,8 96.1 9.8 18. 16 11,169 9. 91. 151 13,916 1 95.9 13, 96. 8 31.9 16.6 1 1,53 8. 89.5 16 179 13,53 173 96.7 13,66 96.6 6 1.5 16.6 165 1,86 9.1 9.8 17 156 1,938 15 96.5 1,76 96. 8 18. 16.9 1 11,85 89.8 91.6 178 13,37 173 97.1 1,793 96.6 5 5.3 16. 157 11,91 88.1 9. 3 16 137 13,38 133 96.8 1,911 96.9 5 18. 15.3 1 1,16 9. 91.7 17 181 13,158 175 96.6 1,73 96.8 6 1.3 15.9 169 1,16 93. 9. 161 1,75 155 96. 1,33 96.9 55 3.1 16. 135 11,5 83.8 9. 16 177 1,688 173 97. 1,3 96.9 8 15.8 15.8 163 11,676 9. 9. 17 16 1,873 11 96.6 1,67 96.8 19 13. 15. 136 11,953 93. 9.9 15 1,1 11 97.1 11,77 96.9 3 15.9 6.6 11 11,5 83. 91. 5 16 17 1,178 16 96.5 11,815 97. 9 5.3 5.7 15 11,17 9. 9.1 17 175 1, 169 96.9 11,838 96.9 5.9 6.1 167 11,367 95. 93. 935 79,86 9 96.3 76,17 96. 66 8.5 15.6 787 7,967 8. 89.5 KN-5 16 91 77,38 91 96.7 7,68 96.5 1 15.1 15. 857 7,3 91.1 91. 17 95 7,855 89 96. 7,3 96.5 138 1.9 15.3 85 68,71 91.9 91.8 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_attendance 17-18 Data Packet 9

Teachers Teacher Statistics Teachers: 6 DISTRIBUTIONS Ethnicity/Race ican Multiple Other Gender Female Male 1-15 -16 16-17 Number 8 8 Number 5 15 ATTENDANCE / RETENTION Average Absences 6.7 5.6 6.9 Percentage 6.7. 13.3.. Percentage 75. 5. Retention Rate 7.3 66.7 77.6 YEARS EXPERIENCE s Beginning () 1 3 5 1-3 1-5 6-1 11 - More than Number 1 3 9 6 18 9 1 3 Percentage 3.3 5. 15. 1. 3.3 6.7 3. More than 3 8 6.7. 15. 16.7 5. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_teacher 17-18 Data Packet 1

3-8 (EN) Read (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): READING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 5. 3.1 58.5 9.5. 3. 3.9 5. 59.6 5.8 59.1 1 3 16 * 3.5 5.9 6. * 5. 39.7.7 6.8 5.7 58.1 9 17 * 6.9 8.8 8.5 3.1 6.5 6..9 6.1 9.3 59.5 16 1.3.1.6 1.3 1..1.1 39.1 3.8 1. 55.9 133 16 66.7.7 57.8 5.5 8.6 7.6 3.8.3 63.6 51.6 6.6 16 17 * 39.1 7.5 3.6. 3.5 7. 38.6 9.1 3.6 56. 11 71. 6.3 65.3 67.9 35.7 65.1 59.3 6.6 6.8 6.7 7.6 136 5 16 * 53. 5. 51.9 11.8. 39.8 53.6 5. 51.9 7.6 19 17 * 51.8 59.3 57.1 1. 5.9 8.9 5. 66.3 57.9 71.7 171 5.5 8.8 56.5 53. 18. 5..3 5. 55. 5. 63.5 389 3-5 16 53.8 3. 5. 9.8 1.8 6.3 36.8 7.1 53.7 5.1 63.9 39 17 8. 6. 5.9 5.6 13.8 7.1. 3.8 6.3 51.3 6.7 7 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5 168 193 37 33 7 53 165 389 16 13 15 177 95 7 67 39 187 16 39 17 1 151 55 385 9 1 56 33 19 7,3,59 3,8 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_read_per_app 17-18 Data Packet 11

3-8 (EN) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): READING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 33 6 9 7 7 19 59,981 1 3 16 * 7 3 5 * 1 38 6 5 51 3,11 9 17 * 6 67 1 3 8 5 7 3,1 16 6 33 36 61 9 11 6 36 78 3,197 133 16 3 7 5 5 11 5 1 61,78 16 17 * 8 3 57 6 19 53 35 7 6 3,33 11 6 36 9 15 9 19 8, 136 5 16 * 7 31 51 15 15 59 3 3 6,9 19 17 * 7 66 9 3 67 8 7,69 171 1 86 8 13 7 33 151 111 7 185 8,18 389 3-5 16 6 86 81 18 3 36 151 99 75 17 8,136 39 17 81 1 19 5 7 18 131 77 8 8,66 7 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5 168 193 37 33 7 53 165 389 16 13 15 177 95 7 67 39 187 16 39 17 1 151 55 385 9 1 56 33 19 7,3,59 3,8 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_read_num_not_app 17-18 Data Packet 1

3-8 (EN) Read (3) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): READING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD. 15.5 3.1.... 16. 9.8 1.7 6. 1 3 16 * 1.5 3.5 19. * 19. 11.1 19.1 19.1 19.1 9. 9 17 *. 3.3 3.1 15. 18.6 17.3 18. 3.5.7 3.9 16. 19.3 3.1.. 6.3 6.5 18.8.3 19.5 7.3 133 16 33.3 13. 8.1.9. 1.3 5.1 16.9 9.1. 8.6 16 17 * 19.6 6..8. 7.6 16. 1.1 6. 3.6 3. 11 1.3 17. 17.3 17.9. 1. 1. 17.1 16.7 16.9 9. 136 5 16 * 17. 16.1 15.1. 1. 3.1 15.9 15. 15.5 36.3 19 17 * 5. 5.9 5.3. 19.1 16.8.7 3.1 6.3 38. 171.5 17.3 3.3 19.9. 15.3 7.5 17. 1.8 19.3 7.7 389 3-5 16 15. 1.5.6 19.. 1.9 5.9 17.1 1. 18.9 31. 39 17 6..5 5.1. 6.9.7 16.8.6 3. 5.1 3.6 7 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5 168 193 37 33 7 53 165 389 16 13 15 177 95 7 67 39 187 16 39 17 1 151 55 385 9 1 56 33 19 7,3,59 3,8 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_read_per_met 17-18 Data Packet 13

3-8 (EN) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): READING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD. 5. 15.1 9.9.. 1.5 8. 1.6 9. 13.1 1 3 16 *.5 15.7 9.5 * 1.3 6.3 8.5 1.6 9.6 15. 9 17 * 8. 15.1 13.8 7.7 9.3 7.7 9.1. 1.. 16. 7. 7.7 8.7. 5.3 1.3 7. 6.3 6.8 1. 133 16 16.7 5.6 9. 8.6..8 1.3 5.6 1.9 7.9 13. 16 17 * 13. 18. 15.8. 13.8 9.6 1. 17. 15.5 16.9 11 1.3 9.. 7.1..3.9 9.8 1.9 6.6 1. 136 5 16 * 1.1 6.5 8.5.. 1. 1.1 6.7 8.5 16.6 19 17 * 7.1 11.1 8.. 7. 6.1 11. 9.6 1.5 19. 171.5 7.1 8.3 8.5..8 1. 8.5 6.1 7.5 13. 389 3-5 16 7.7 7. 1. 8.8. 7.5.5 8. 9.3 8.6 15.1 39 17. 9.3 1.1 1. 3. 9.3 7. 11. 15.5 13.1 18.8 7 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 3-5 168 193 37 33 7 53 165 389 16 13 15 177 95 7 67 39 187 16 39 17 1 151 55 385 9 1 56 33 19 7,3,59 3,8 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_read_per_mst 17-18 Data Packet 1

3-8 (EN) Read (5) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): READING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Understanding Across Genres (GR 3-5) 1. Understanding/Analysis Across Genres (GR 6-8). Understanding/Analysis of Literary Texts 3. Understanding/Analysis of Informational Texts 5. 51.1 53.6 3 16 51.8 5. 6.5 17 58.8 5.7 5.9 5.5 53. 6.5 16 61.7 5. 5. 17 59. 56.3 7.1 55.7 59.5 58. 5 16 55. 57.8 53.6 17 61.1 59.1 59.5 51.7 5.8 5.9 3-5 16 56.6 55. 51.3 17 59.8 56. 5.1 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_read_obj 17-18 Data Packet 15

3-8 (EN) Writing (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): WRITING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 1.3 1.1 6.9 3.6..1. 36.8 7.6. 57.9 131 16 66.7 38.9 5.3.8. 35. 8. 33.3 55.6.9 57.3 16 17 * 8.3 3.3 37.. 3.1.8 35.1. 37.6 5. 19 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 7 56 6 11 1 19 75 68 63 131 16 6 5 6 15 7 78 7 5 16 17 6 6 99 6 8 7 57 5 19 7,15 7,39 7,53 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_write_per_app 17-18 Data Packet 16

3-8 (EN) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): WRITING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 6 33 3 57 1 11 57 3 33 76 3,1 131 16 33 35 58 7 13 56 8 7 3,9 16 17 * 33 3 6 6 19 57 37 31 68 3,35 19 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 7 56 6 11 1 19 75 68 63 131 16 6 5 6 15 7 78 7 5 16 17 6 6 99 6 8 7 57 5 19 7,15 7,39 7,53 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_write_num_not_app 17-18 Data Packet 17

3-8 (EN) Writing (3) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): WRITING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD. 16.1 1.1 13.9. 5.3.7 13. 1.3 13.7 19.5 131 16 16.7 9.3 17. 1.3.. 6. 9.7 18.5 13.5 8.7 16 17 * 13. 1.7 19.. 1.7 9.7 17.5 19. 18.3 6. 19 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 7 56 6 11 1 19 75 68 63 131 16 6 5 6 15 7 78 7 5 16 17 6 6 99 6 8 7 57 5 19 7,15 7,39 7,53 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_write_per_met 17-18 Data Packet 18

3-8 (EN) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): WRITING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD. 1.8.7 3..... 1.6 3.1.1 131 16. 3.7 3.1 3.8....8 3.7 3. 1.9 16 17 * 6.5 5. 5.1.. 1. 3.5 7.7 5.5 7. 19 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 7 56 6 11 1 19 75 68 63 131 16 6 5 6 15 7 78 7 5 16 17 6 6 99 6 8 7 57 5 19 7,15 7,39 7,53 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_write_per_mst 17-18 Data Packet 19

3-8 (EN) Writing (5) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): WRITING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Composition¹ GR : Personal Narrative GR 7: Expository 1. Composition¹ GR : Expository GR 7: Personal Narrative. Revision 3. Editing 3.5 3.5 9. 5.8 16 3. 56.7 53.5 17 3. 5. 5.6 ¹Average score points (range -8). A composition is rated tw ice on a scale of 1 to, and the ratings are summed to determine score points for the composition. Score point scale: =Nonscorable; =Very Limited; 3=betw een Very Limited and Basic; =Basic; 5=betw een Basic and Satisfactory; 6=Satisfactory; 7=betw een Satisfactory and Accomplished; 8=Accomplished NOTE: Beginning in 16, only one composition w as required. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_write_obj 17-18 Data Packet

3-8 (EN) Math (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 7. 1.1 55. 53.3 16.7 5. 3.5 3.6 6. 51.8 63.8 168 3 16 * 5. 51.9 9.5 * 5.8 5.6 8.3 51.6 5. 65.3 1 17 * 38.8 5.5 6.3 7.7 5.5 5.3.9 58.7 9. 7. 18 1.3 38.6 55.3 9.6 1. 5.6 36.5 51.8 3. 7. 6. 171 16 1. 37.7 5.3 9.7 5. 6.3 36.6 38.9 61. 9. 63.5 17 17 * 7.8 58. 56.6. 5. 5.6 5. 6. 55. 68.1 1.9 37.7 61. 53.3 8.6 7. 7. 6.3 58.1 51. 66. 1 5 16 * 5. 66. 6.7 11.8 63. 53.8 59.5 6.3 59.9 79.6 16 17 * 5.7 7.9 66.5 3. 66.7 59.7 55.9 76.7 65.9 8.6 179 5.8 39. 57.1 5. 19. 57.1. 7.1 53.6 5.1 63.5 83 3-5 16 69.. 56.7 53. 1.3 51.7 5.5 8.7 58. 53.3 69.3 56 17 8. 6.7 6.7 56. 13.8 5.5 51.5 9.3 65.8 56.9 7.7 99 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5 166 87 396 36 163 33 59 83 16 13 151 8 393 8 17 33 3 56 17 1 15 38 5 9 13 38 68 31 99 36,965 36,959 37,78 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_math_per_app 17-18 Data Packet 1

3-8 (EN) Math () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): MATHEMATICS NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 3 33 5 6 1 8 65 53 8 81,65 168 3 16 * 38 56 * 6 9 3 31 61,78 1 17 * 3 57 86 1 7 6 31 91 3,851 18 6 35 6 7 9 7 73 5 9,897 171 16 33 53 7 6 36 78 55 3 87,63 17 17 * 38 56 6 9 56 35 8 63,16 1 33 3 56 1 15 6 6 7 3,958 1 5 16 * 9 3 53 15 1 6 3 31 65,1 16 17 * 6 3 5 7 6 56 1 61,38 179 13 11 13 19 9 7 198 137 1 1 13,57 83 3-5 16 8 13 183 83 187 119 9 13 11,353 56 17 8 19 196 5 97 159 136 79 15 1,175 99 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5 166 87 396 36 163 33 59 83 16 13 151 8 393 8 17 33 3 56 17 1 15 38 5 9 13 38 68 31 99 36,965 36,959 37,78 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_math_num_not_app 17-18 Data Packet

3-8 (EN) Math (3) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD. 1.5 5.7 19.. 1.3 1. 3. 1.9 19.6 8. 168 3 16 * 7.5 1.5 18. * 16.7 13.3.1 1.5 18. 3.6 1 17 *...5 7.7 18. 18.6 18.1 3. 3.9 39.9 18. 1. 1.7 1.. 5.3.3 16.9 6.8 11.7. 171 16. 11.3 1. 1.. 9. 6.5 1. 13. 1.8 8.9 17 17 * 19.6 3.1.5. 13.8 1.6 5.7 18.6.1 39. 1 1.3 13. 16.9 16.7.. 9.6 1.6 16.1 15.3 3.5 1 5 16 * 13.8. 17. 5.9 19.3 1.8.6 1.8 17.9 35.3 16 17 * 18. 3.9.5..5 16.5...3. 179. 13.3 17.8 15.9. 1.9 8.1 18.5 1.1 15.5 7. 83 3-5 16 7.7 11.3 18.3 15.5 3.6 1.5 9.9 19. 1.9 16. 3.3 56 17 5. 19.3 3.8 1.8 3. 17.8 15.9.9 5.1.8.5 99 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5 166 87 396 36 163 3 59 83 16 13 151 8 393 8 17 33 3 56 17 1 15 38 5 9 13 38 68 31 99 36,965 36,959 37,78 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_math_per_met 17-18 Data Packet 3

3-8 (EN) Math () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD. 3.6 8.9 5.8. 5..6 7. 5. 6.5 9. 168 3 16 *.5 7.6 6.3 *.1. 1.1 1.6 6.6 1.5 1 17 * 8. 9. 8.8 7.7 7.8 7. 8.6 1. 1. 19.9 18. 7..9 5.8. 5.3.6 8..3 5.3 1.1 171 16. 3.8 9.9 6.8. 6. 3.3 8.9 6.1 7.6 1.6 17 17 * 13. 11. 11.6. 1.7 3.9 1.3 8.6 11..1 1. 1.9 6. 5.. 8. 3.5.9 3.. 11.8 1 5 16 * 5. 6. 6.7. 8.8.6 9.5.6 6. 13.9 16 17 * 7.3 7.7 6.8. 5.1.3 8.6 5.8 7.3 19.3 179.. 6.6 5.6. 6.1.9 6.9 3.6 5. 1.3 83 3-5 16 7.7. 8.1 6.6. 5.8.1 9.9 3.6 6.8 13.6 56 17. 9.3 9.1 8.9 3. 5..9 1.1 8.7 9.. 99 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 3-5 166 87 396 36 163 3 59 83 16 13 151 8 393 8 17 33 3 56 17 1 15 38 5 9 13 38 68 31 99 36,965 36,959 37,78 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_math_per_mst 17-18 Data Packet

3-8 (EN) Math (5) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): MATHEMATICS AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Numerical Representations and Relationships. Computations and Algebraic Relationships 3. Geometry and Measurement. Data Analysis and Personal Financial Literacy 57.6 51.6 8. 55. 3 16 57.6 9.8 9.7 5. 17 5.6 53.1 8.5 51. 61.8 7.5 39.6 1. 16 63. 5.5 38. 5.3 17 61.3 8.6 9. 7.5 7.5 6. 7.5 7.7 5 16 57.1 51.6 55. 51.1 17 5. 56. 55.7 5.7 56.1 8.5.8 8. 3-5 16 59.5 5.7 7. 51.1 17 55.7 5.9 51.3 51. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_math_obj 17-18 Data Packet 5

3-8 (EN) Science (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): SCIENCE PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD.9 35.8 6.7.9 8.6.8 35.5 7. 3. 1.3 57.1 11 5 16 * 53.6 65. 58.7 31.3 59.1 9.5 7.3 6.7 6. 66.1 15 17 * 6.8 6.3 63.5. 55.6 6. 6. 67.1 65.5 65.9 17 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 5 7 53 6 98 1 9 93 78 3 11 16 5 56 6 1 16 91 65 6 15 17 5 5 11 159 1 7 135 89 85 17 9,53 9,66 9,759 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_sc_per_app 17-18 Data Packet 6

3-8 (EN) Science () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): SCIENCE NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 3 3 5 1 16 6 1 3 71 59 11 5 16 * 6 1 3 11 9 6 18 3 5 363 15 17 * 19 58 8 3 5 3 8 6 338 17 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 5 7 53 6 98 1 9 93 78 3 11 16 5 56 6 1 16 91 65 6 15 17 5 5 11 159 1 7 135 89 85 17 9,53 9,66 9,759 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_sc_num_not_app 17-18 Data Packet 7

3-8 (EN) Science (3) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): SCIENCE PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD. 9. 15. 1.. 13.8 6.5 1.1 7. 11.6 1.8 11 5 16 * 1. 1.7 19...7 8.8 1.5..8 6.7 15 17 *..1.6. 19. 17..7. 3.6 33. 17 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 5 7 53 6 98 1 9 93 78 3 11 16 5 56 6 1 16 91 65 6 15 17 5 5 11 159 1 7 135 89 85 17 9,53 9,66 9,759 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_sc_per_met 17-18 Data Packet 8

3-8 (EN) Science () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): SCIENCE PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD. 1.9 5..1. 3. 3. 3.8.3 3.3 6.3 11 5 16 * 3.6 6.7.8..5 1.1.6 5..8 6.7 15 17 * 9.3 8.9 7.5. 8.3 5.9 7.9 1.6 9. 1.8 17 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 5 7 53 6 98 1 9 93 78 3 11 16 5 56 6 1 16 91 65 6 15 17 5 5 11 159 1 7 135 89 85 17 9,53 9,66 9,759 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_sc_per_mst 17-18 Data Packet 9

3-8 (EN) Science (5) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): SCIENCE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Matter and Energy. Force, Motion, and Energy 3. Earth and Space. Organisms and Environments 58.5 58.3 51.8 53.7 5 16 63.8 6.9 59.7 6. 17 57.1 6.1 68. 61. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_e_sc_obj 17-18 Data Packet 3

3-8 (SP) Read (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): READING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 7.7 7. 71.9 71.9 53.8 8. 7.7 66. 58 3 16 5.6 51. 51. 51.. 6.9 5.6 66. 38 17 17.6 1. 17.6 17.6 11.8 3.5 17.6 66. 3 5.6 51. 5.6 5.6.9 58.3 5.6 6. 38 16 35. 31.1 * 36. 36. 1.1.8 35. 61. 8 17. 16.1 17.6. 11.8 7.8. 6. 35 91.7 9. 91.7 91.7 * 1. 91.7 83.5 1 5 16 69.7 75.9 69.7 69.7 6.5 77.8 7.6 79.1 3 17 55.6 57.1 55.6 55.6 5. * 55.6 87.3 9 66.7 65.7 67.3 67.3 51. 76.9 66.7 7.1 18 3-5 16 5. 9.5 * 5. 5.. 58.6 5.8 68. 1 17 3.1 17.6.1 3.1 17.5 8.9 3.1 71.3 78 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5 18 99 17 17 3 65 18 16 119 19 117 117 5 7 1 17 78 68 77 78 38 78 1,919 1,879 1,76 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_read_per_app 17-18 Data Packet 31

3-8 (SP) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): READING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 17 16 16 16 1 5 17 1,9 58 3 16 18 17 18 18 9 9 18 1,95 38 17 8 7 8 8 15 13 8 1,887 3 18 17 18 18 8 1 18 1,867 38 16 31 31 * 3 3 15 16 31 1,97 8 17 8 6 8 8 15 13 8 1,83 35 1 1 1 1 * 1 669 1 5 16 1 7 1 1 6 1 876 3 17 3 3 * 51 9 36 3 35 35 1 15 36,58 18 3-5 16 59 55 * 58 58 3 9 59,755 1 17 6 56 6 6 33 7 6,38 78 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5 18 99 17 17 3 65 18 16 119 19 117 117 5 7 1 17 78 68 77 78 38 78 1,919 1,879 1,76 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_read_num_not_app 17-18 Data Packet 3

3-8 (SP) Read (3) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): READING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 9.3 5.9 9.8 9.8 3.1 3. 9.3 3. 58 3 16 6.3.9.3.3 13.3 3.8 6.3 36.9 38 17 5.9. 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 39. 3 18. 1.3 18. 18. 7.1 5. 18. 9.8 38 16 7.1. * 7.7 7.7 1.1 31. 7.1 35.5 8 17 5.7 3. 5.9 5.7 5.9 5.6 5.7 36. 35 66.7 6. 66.7 66.7 * 77.8 66.7 39. 1 5 16 36. 1. 36. 36. 3.8 33.3 38. 3.3 3 17. 1.3.. 33.3 *. 9.1 9 9.6 5.3 9.9 9.9 18.6 36.9 9.6 3.5 18 3-5 16 9. 7.5 * 9.1 9.1 6. 3.9 3. 38. 1 17 7.7.9 7.8 7.7 1. 5.3 7.7.8 78 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5 18 99 17 17 3 65 18 16 119 19 117 117 5 7 1 17 78 68 77 78 38 78 1,919 1,879 1,76 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_read_per_met 17-18 Data Packet 33

3-8 (SP) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): READING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 19. 16.7 19.3 19.3 19. 18.8 19. 16.1 58 3 16 15.8 1.3 16. 16. 6.7 1.7 15.8 1. 38 17....... 5. 3 5.3.9 5.3 5.3 7.1. 5.3 11.6 38 16 1.5 8.9 * 1.8 1.8 1.5 13.8 1.5 16.6 8 17....... 17.3 35 5. 3. 5. 5. * 33.3 5. 13.9 1 5 16 6.1 6.9 6.1 6.1 6.3 5.6 5.9 13.6 3 17..... *..7 9 1.8 13.1 15. 15. 1. 15. 1.8 1. 18 3-5 16 11.8 1.1 * 1. 1. 8. 1.3 11.7 17.5 1 17....... 1.9 78 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 3-5 18 99 17 17 3 65 18 16 119 19 117 117 5 7 1 17 78 68 77 78 38 78 1,919 1,879 1,76 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_read_per_mst 17-18 Data Packet 3

3-8 (SP) Read (5) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): READING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Understanding Across Genres. Understanding/Analysis of Literary Texts 3. Understanding/Analysis of Informational Texts 6.7 61. 58.1 3 16 57.5 5. 57.1 17.6 35.9 37. 55. 57.3 51.8 16 55. 51.3 53.1 17 3.7 6.3 1.1 6. 75. 66.7 5 16 59. 63. 61.9 17 5. 5. 7.6 61. 61.3 56.8 3-5 16 57. 5.8 56.9 17 37.7.7.1 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_read_obj 17-18 Data Packet 35

3-8 (SP) Writing (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): WRITING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD.7..7.7 5. 1.7.7 67.9 38 16 5. 7.8 * 9. 9. 3. 63.3 5. 71.7 5 17 33.3 3.3 31. 33.3 17.6 7. 33.3 7.3 36 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 38 36 38 38 1 38 16 5 6 9 9 3 5 17 36 33 35 36 17 19 36 5,7 5,116 5,7 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_write_per_app 17-18 Data Packet 36

3-8 (SP) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): WRITING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 1 1 1 7 1 1 1,685 38 16 5 * 5 5 1 11 5 1,9 5 17 3 1 1 1,58 36 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 38 36 38 38 1 38 16 5 6 9 9 3 5 17 36 33 35 36 17 19 36 5,7 5,116 5,7 37 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_write_num_not_app 17-18 Data Packet

3-8 (SP) Writing (3) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): WRITING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 13. 13.9 13. 13. 35.7. 13. 3. 38 16 6. 1.7 * 6.5 6.5 1. 36.7 6. 9.1 5 17 5.6 6.1 5.7 5.6 5.9 5.3 5.6. 36 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 38 36 38 38 1 38 16 5 6 9 9 3 5 17 36 33 35 36 17 19 36 5,7 5,116 5,7 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_write_per_met 17-18 Data Packet 38

3-8 (SP) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): WRITING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD....... 7. 38 16 8..3 * 8. 8. 5. 1. 8. 1.9 5 17.8 3..9.8 5.9..8 1. 36 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 38 36 38 38 1 38 16 5 6 9 9 3 5 17 36 33 35 36 17 19 36 5,7 5,116 5,7 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_write_per_mst 17-18 Data Packet 39

3-8 (SP) Writing (5) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): WRITING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Composition Personal Narrative¹ 1. Composition Expository¹. Revision 3. Editing 3.6.9 5.3 6.5 16 3.7 57.3 55.7 17 3. 38.9 6.9 ¹Average score points (range -8). A STAAR composition is rated tw ice on a scale of 1 to, and the ratings are summed to determine score points for the composition. Score point scale: =Nonscorable; =Very Limited; 3=betw een Very Limited and Basic; =Basic; 5=betw een Basic and Satisfactory; 6=Satisfactory; 7=betw een Satisfactory and Accomplished; 8=Accomplished NOTE: Beginning in 16, only one composition w as required. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar38_s_write_obj 17-18 Data Packet

Compliance State Compensatory ation (SCE) Compliance for At-Risk Students PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE on the TERRANOVA/SUPERA TERRANOVA/SUPERA READING At Risk Not At Risk All District At Risk Not At Risk All K 1 16 87.5 8.5 86. 83. 13 K 16 5.3 7.7 56. 17 9.8 73.3 83.7 81.7 19 17 6.5 8.3 7.3 16 75.9 76.1 76. 75.9 15 1 16 3.5 1.8 35.6 17 77.8 6. 69.9 7.6 13 17.3 6.5 35.5 TERRANOVA/SUPERA MATHEMATICS District 59. 133 59.7 131 5. 19 5. 11 K- 16 36. 61.9 8.8 53. 17 16 51.1 63.1 57. 17 35.8 66.7 5.9 5.1 159 17 55.7 6.6 6.1 16 65. 7.7 68.6 7. 5 K- 16. 58. 9.8 17 67.1 67. 67.1 69.6 31 17.7 53.8 8.1 56.8 17 57.7 158 56. 5 57. 3 # Tested (GR K-) 16 3 9 5 383 # Tested (GR K-) 16 5 9 5 3791 17 9 31 35,6 17 1 3 35,36 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_sce_compliance 17-18 Data Packet 1

TN Read (1) TerraNova Reading PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 1 16 * 78.7 1. 8.6 * * 8.6 86.5 81.8 8.3 79. 7 17 * 65.6 8.6 73.5 * * 85.7 7. 7.3 7. 77.8 66 16 * 6.1 77. 69.7 * * 6.7 7.6 69. 69.7 66.5 76 17 * 51.1 73.1 63.6. * 5. 55.6 6.3 6.3 63.3 78 K- 16 * 55.3 6. 58.3 1.3 6.5 5.5 5.3 8. 58.7 61. 1 17 * 61.5 71. 67. * * 6.5 6.1 73. 68.8 6. 8 16 83.3 66. 7.6 68.8 1.7 58.3 56. 63. 76.5 69. 68.5 5 17 91.7 58.6 75. 67.9 15. 5. 6. 6. 7.3 67. 66.5 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 133 95 3 1 1 5 135 115 5 17 1 116 9 168 13 1 5 16 118,593 19,8 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_read_1_perge 17-18 Data Packet

TN Read () TerraNova Reading NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 1 16 * 1 8 * * 1 1,353 7 17 * 5 11 11 * * 8 9 17 1,995 66 16 * 8 7 13 * * 8 9 17 1,65 76 17 * 9 8 16 * 1 1 1 1,5 78 K- 16 * 8 9 16 1 8 9 17 1,35 1 17 * 3 5 * * 1 5 7 1,98 8 16 3 3 51 1 1 5 3 8 58 5,33 5 17 5 16 3 1 1,795 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 133 95 3 1 1 5 135 115 5 17 1 116 9 168 13 1 5 16 118,593 19,8 3 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_read nge8 17-18 Data Packet

TN Lang (1) TerraNova Language PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 1 16 * 61.7 75. 63.1 * * 53.8 6.9 66.7 65.7 7.6 7 17 * 65.6 77. 73.5 * * 85.7 67.7 7.3 71. 7.8 66 16 * 6. 6.7.6 * * 35.7. 7.6 5.3 5. 75 17 *..3 5.9. * 3.. 5..9 8.9 78 K- 16 *.6 5..7 8.6 5. 7.3 35.9 6. 5. 6.7 1 17 * 6. 37.1. * * 5. 1. 8.8 5. 6.9 8 16 58.3 5. 53. 9.8 5. 7.3 36.7 5.5 57. 51. 55.8 9 17 75. 5. 5. 5.. 3.. 5. 55.1 5.7 5.8 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 133 9 33 1 11 9 13 115 9 17 1 116 9 168 13 1 5 16 118,57 19,76 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_lang_1_perge 17-18 Data Packet

TN Lang () TerraNova Language NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 1 16 * 7 8 * * 6 1 1,583 7 17 * 6 5 * * 1 5 9 1,38 66 16 * 3 3 5 * * 1 3 7 733 75 17 * 5 * 1 3 3 6 71 78 K- 16 * 7 7 15 1 3 7 8 15 977 1 17 * 3 7 * * 5 3 8 985 8 16 1 17 1 8 1 17 15 3 3,93 9 17 1 1 11 17 13 1 3 3,5 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 133 9 33 1 11 9 13 115 9 17 1 116 9 168 13 1 5 16 118,57 19,76 5 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_lang nge8 17-18 Data Packet

TN Math (1) TerraNova Mathematics PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 1 16 * 57. 57.9 56.8 * 6.7 7. 58.3 57.1 57.7 59.5 13 17 * 6.9 8.9 6.9 * 5.3 7.8.3 51.5 8.1 59.7 19 16 * 3.1. 3.6 * 31. 3.5 38. 33.3 35.6 5. 19 17 * 37.8 31.5 3.5. 6..3 9..5 35.5 5. 11 K- 16 * 53. 57. 56.8 5. 56.8 51.1 51. 6.9 57. 56.9 17 17 * 55. 58.7 61.5 * 5.8 53.9 6. 58.8 59. 57.9 155 16 66.7 5.9 51.5 9.8 18.8 5.1 3. 9.1 51.1 5.1 56.1 51 17 83.3 6. 7.3 51.9 1. 1.8.3 5.5 5. 8. 57.3 5 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 133 95 3 16 6 5 51 17 1 117 9 3 1 15 198 7 5 37,758 35,8 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_math_1_perge 17-18 Data Packet 6

TN Math () TerraNova Mathematics NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 1 16 * 5 13 18 * 9 9 8 11 19,11 13 17 * 3 8 6 * 5 1 1 11 1,868 19 16 * 1 6 * 6 1,519 19 17 * 1 5 1 1 6 1,67 11 K- 16 * 6 15 1 6 6 1 8,167 17 17 * 11 15 3 * 7 7 18 9 7,111 155 16 1 3 6 1 17 17 6 1 7 5,8 51 17 15 7 3 1 13 3 1 5,586 5 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 133 95 3 16 6 5 51 17 1 117 9 3 1 15 198 7 5 37,758 35,8 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_e_math nge8 17-18 Data Packet 7

SUP Read (1) SUPERA Reading PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 1 16 88.3 88.3 * 88.1 88.1 8.6 91.9 88.3 87.5 6 17 93.7 95.9 * 93.5 93.5 96.7 9.9 93.7 85.8 63 16 8. 83.1 * 8. 8. 7.3 89.7 8. 87. 7 17 81.5 8.9 * 8.5 8.3 69. 89.7 81.5 87.7 65 K- 16 3.3 33.3 * 33.3 33.3 9. 38. 33.8. 68 17 * 33.3 3.8 * 3.9 3.9 17.5 8.7 3.9 6.9 79 16 68. 68. * 67. 67. 59.8 7.5 67.8 7.7 17 * 67. 66. 8.6 67.7 67.5 56.3 75.7 66.7 73. 7 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 197 193 193 9 11 17 1 6 159 7 198 197 96 111 7 17,3 16,5 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_s_read_1_perge 17-18 Data Packet 8

SUP Read () SUPERA Reading NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 1 16 36 36 * 35 35 13 3 36 3,369 6 17 33 * 1 1 1 1 3,98 63 16 7 7 * 8 19 7,597 7 17 1 * 1 1 18,83 65 K- 16 3 3 * 3 3 1 3 33 68 17 * 3 3 * 3 3 3 3 383 79 16 66 66 * 6 6 66 6,3 17 * 67 8 65 65 5 67 5,96 7 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 197 193 193 9 11 17 1 6 159 7 198 197 96 111 7 17,3 16,5 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_s_read nge8 17-18 Data Packet 9

SUP Lang (1) SUPERA Language PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE th PERCENTILE K 1 16 86.7 86.7 * 86. 86. 8.6 89. 86.7 85. 6 17 93.7 98. * 93.5 93.5 9. 97. 93.7 83.5 63 16 58.1 59. * 55.9 55.9.9 71.8 58.1 69. 7 17 7.7 3.9 * 7.6 6.8 6. 8.7 7.7 69.5 65 K- 16 37.3 36. * 36. 36. 38. 35.3 36.8 38.6 68 17 * 38.5.6 * 37. 37. 7.5 51.3 39.. 79 16 59.7 59.9 * 58.5 58.5 51.1 66. 59. 6. 17 * 58.3 59.1 1.3 58.1 57.9 5.1 6. 58.5 6.7 7 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 197 193 193 9 11 17 1 6 159 7 198 197 96 111 7 17,9 16,5 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_s_lang_1_perge 17-18 Data Packet 5

SUP Lang () SUPERA Reading NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 8th PERCENTILE K 1 16 3 3 * 8 15 3,3 6 17 16 * 1 8,63 63 16 1 1 * 11 11 5 9 1 1,1 7 17 5 3 * 1 5 97 65 K- 16 1 1 * 1 1 1 1 6 68 17 * 5 * 5 5 3 5 655 79 16 38 38 * 3 3 1 38,73 17 * 9 9 9 16 1 3 3,665 7 # Tested (GR K-) 16 1 197 193 193 9 11 17 1 6 159 7 198 197 96 111 7 17,9 16,5 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_nr_s_lang nge8 17-18 Data Packet 51

TELPAS Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System 16-17 Domain: Listening PERFORMANCE IN 17 Speaking Writing Reading Composite Number Rated Both s (N Rated) 17 Level N % N % N % N % N % N (%) Progressed 17 Level PROGRESSION FROM 16 TO 17 Beg 16 Level Int Adv Adv High Beginning 33 5. 35 53. 61 9. 61 9. 61 9. Beginning KN Intermediate 5 37.9 7.9 5 7.6 5 7.6 5 7.6 Intermediate (66) Advanced 8 1.1 6.1... Advanced Advanced High..... Advanced High Beginning 5 7.6 11 16.7 38 57.6 3 5.5 9 3.9 Beginning 5 1 Intermediate 19 8.8 1 31.8 19 8.8 3.3 1 31.8 61 Intermediate 15 5 (66) Advanced 5 37.9 3 3.8 9 13.6 1 18. 1 1. 31 (5.8%) Advanced 11 3 Advanced High 17 5.8 11 16.7. 6.1 3. Advanced High Beginning 11 1.5 1 18. 33 3. 8 37.8 3 31.1 Beginning 19 Intermediate 31.8 37 8.7 8.9 6 35.1 3.5 66 Intermediate 5 (76) Advanced 3 3.3 1 18. 18 3.7 1 18.9 1 16. 16 (.%) Advanced 3 6 Advanced High 11 1.5 11 1.5 3 3.9 6 8.1 9 1. Advanced High 1 6 Beginning 8 1. 1 15.6 3 9.9 7 35.1 19.7 Beginning 16 3 Intermediate 19.7 8.6 5 3.5 5 3.5 31. 7 Intermediate 7 17 (77) Advanced 5 3.5 18 3. 15 19.5 16.8 1 7.3 3 (1.7%) Advanced 1 9 Advanced High 5 3.5 5 3.5 1 18. 9 11.7 13 16.9 Advanced High 9 Beginning 7 11.1 8 1.7 1 15.9 16 5. 9 1.3 Beginning 6 Intermediate 18 8.6 9 6. 9 6. 9 6. 8. 57 Intermediate 7 19 (63) Advanced 5 39.7 19 3. 1. 1. 31.7 17 (9.8%) Advanced 15 Advanced High 13.6 7 11.1 1 15.9 6.3 6 9.5 Advanced High 6 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_telpas 17-18 Data Packet 5

TELPAS Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System 16-17 Domain: Listening PERFORMANCE IN 17 Speaking Writing Reading Composite Number Rated Both s (N Rated) 17 Level N % N % N % N % N % N (%) Progressed 17 Level PROGRESSION FROM 16 TO 17 Beg 16 Level Int Adv Adv High Beginning 1 1.3.6 1 1.3 6 7.9.6 Beginning 5 Intermediate 3 3.9.6 3 3.3 9 38. 18 3.7 73 Intermediate 13 (76) Advanced 8.9 6 3. 3.7 7 35.5 3.7 5 (61.6%) Advanced 17 13 Advanced High 5 65.8 6 6.5 18 3.7 1 18. 8.9 Advanced High 1 1 Beginning 65 15.3 8 19.3 166 39. 168 39.8 13 33.9 Beginning 68 ALL Intermediate 115 7.1 138 3.5 13 9. 13 31.8 16 9.9 39 Intermediate 37 79 () Advanced 18 3. 1.5 9 1. 83 19.7 11 3.9 139 (.%) Advanced 13 37 3 Advanced High 116 7. 1 3.6 5 1.6 37 8.8 5 1.3 Advanced High 6 Indicates students w ho progressed at least one level from 16 to 17. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_telpas 17-18 Data Packet 53

IPT IDEA Proficiency Test PERCENTAGE BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL Level 1 Level Level 3 Level Level 5 Level 6 Number N % N % N % N % Tested N % N % PK 6 1 38.5 9 3.6 6 3.1 * * KN 8 1 1 18 3 7 6 5 9 ALL 16 1.9 1.9 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 7 38.9 6 33.3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 36.7 3 61. 3.5 3 3.3 37 5.3 * * * * 7. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_ipt 17-18 Data Packet 5

ACP Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance SEMESTER 1 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing SEMESTER TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Elementary School Exams KINDERGARTEN MATHEMATICS 18 79.8 8. 8.8 85.6 KINDERGARTEN READING KINDERGARTEN MATHEMATICS KINDERGARTEN READING 6 8.3 88. 9.3 9.8 KINDERGARTEN READING SPANISH KINDERGARTEN READING SPANISH 66 83.1 87. 87.9 9.5 GRADE 1 MATHEMATICS GRADE 1 MATHEMATICS 13 78. 8.8 78. 8.8 GRADE 1 READING GRADE 1 READING 69 79.1 8.3 89.9 9. GRADE 1 READING SPANISH GRADE 1 READING SPANISH 65 8.1 8.1 78.5 91. GRADE MATHEMATICS 15 78.3 85.6 81.9 91.3 93.3 8.7 91.6 GRADE READING 7 73. 8. 8. 79.7 93. 77. 89. GRADE READING SPANISH GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE READING GRADE READING SPANISH 8 77.3 77.3 8.9 76.3 98.8 79.9 93. GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS 151 53. 68.9 79.1 7. 87. 6.9 88.5 August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_acp 17-18 Data Packet 55

ACP Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance SEMESTER 1 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing SEMESTER TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS SPANISH 6 6.3 66.5 81.9 3.6 1..3 79.5 GRADE 3 READING 136 51. 67.5 78.3 5.6 89.7 56. 85.8 GRADE 3 READING SPANISH GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS SPANISH GRADE 3 READING GRADE 3 READING SPANISH 37. 58.3 8. 1. 9.9 59.9 88.7 GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS 19 58.3 65. 79. 5. 9.7 58.3 9. GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS SPANISH GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS SPANISH 37 61. 61. 8. 37.8 1. 67.8 9. GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE MATHEMATICS 138 5.5 67.3 78.7 38. 85.5 6.7 9.3 GRADE MATHEMATICS SPANISH GRADE MATHEMATICS SPANISH 6. 7.7 7.8 66.7 1. 5. 66.3 GRADE READING 11 5. 69.6 78.9 51.8 88. 68.1 9.5 GRADE READING SPANISH 36 5.3 66.9 8.1 5. 1. 7.8 9. GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS GRADE READING GRADE READING SPANISH GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS 169 5. 68. 77.6 39.1 88.8 63.5 9. GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS SPANISH GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS SPANISH * * * * * 5.5 * August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_acp 17-18 Data Packet 56

ACP Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance SEMESTER 1 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing SEMESTER TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course GRADE 5 READING 16 6.6 73. 75. 63. 7.5 7.8 9.8 GRADE 5 READING SPANISH 67 58.5 7. 78.6 6.7 97. 75.7 93.7 GRADE 5 SCIENCE GRADE 5 READING GRADE 5 READING SPANISH GRADE 5 SCIENCE 156 73.3 73.3 8.6 63.5 9. 67.9 93.3 GRADE 5 SCIENCE SPANISH GRADE 5 SCIENCE SPANISH 17 59.7 61. 76.5 9. 88. 69.6 9. August 15, 17 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_acp 17-18 Data Packet 57