SIDNEY LANIER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Similar documents
Data Diskette & CD ROM

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Shelters Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Cooper Upper Elementary School

PEIMS Submission 3 list

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

12-month Enrollment

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

African American Male Achievement Update

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

University of Arizona

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools


Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

State of New Jersey

Best Colleges Main Survey

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Raw Data Files Instructions

Kahului Elementary School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Fashion Design Program Articulation

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

Bellehaven Elementary

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

TxEIS Secondary Grade Reporting Semester 2 & EOY Checklist for txgradebook

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CUMULATIVE RECORD CHANGE CHANGE DATE: JULY 8, 2014 REVISED 11/10/2014

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

Attendance/ Data Clerk Manual.

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Transportation Equity Analysis

For international students wishing to study Japanese language at the Japanese Language Education Center in Term 1 and/or Term 2, 2017

Hokulani Elementary School

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Financing Education In Minnesota

Clark Lane Middle School

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

LIM College New York, NY

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

6 Financial Aid Information

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

46 Children s Defense Fund

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Educational Attainment

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

African American Success Initiative

NCEO Technical Report 27

INTRODUCTION ( MCPS HS Course Bulletin)

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Transcription:

Notice regarding TELPAS: Counts were incorrectly reported in previous versions of 217-18 data packets. Counts were doubled when reported, but percentages were not affected. Data Packet for 217-18 Planning Evaluation & Assessment Office of Institutional Research http://mydata.dallasisd.org OIR@dallasisd.org School Number 17 SIDNEY LANIER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL August 1, 217 Statistics based on all students at campus, including those in vanguard or other choice program

217-18 Data Packet: Standard Issue 1 Table of Contents 2. Contents...Table of Contents. Notes...Notes and Data Descriptions STUDENTS AND STAFF. Summary... Summary of Student and Teacher Statistics 6. Enroll (1)...Enrollment Statistics by Ethnicity 7. Enroll (2)... Enrollment Statistics by Select Student Group 8. Attendance... Student Attendance Statistics 9. Teachers...Teacher Statistics STAAR 1. Reading (-8)... STAAR -8 Reading in English 1. Writing (-8)... STAAR -8 Writing in English 2. Math (-8)... STAAR -8 Mathematics in English 2. Science (-8)... STAAR -8 Science in English STAAR (SPANISH). Reading (-8)... STAAR -8 Reading in Spanish. Writing (-8)... STAAR -8 Writing in Spanish ENGLISH PROFICIENCY. TELPAS...Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System 2. IPT...IDEA Proficiency Test LOCAL ASSESSMENT. ACP...Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance 2 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_contents 217-18 Data Packet

2 Notes Notes, Definitions, and Data Descriptions 216-17 SCHOOL SUMMARY Student percentages are computed as the percentage of total student enrollment. Additional statistics are available in ENROLLMENT and TEACHER reports. Race/ethnic categories are based on the latest federal standards for ethnicity and race reporting, though some categories have been combined due to small group sizes. Students reporting their ethnicity as are not counted in any race category. Teacher demographics and location assignments are from the district's Public ation Information Management System (PEIMS) submission to the TEA. Teacher statistics include all teachers at the campus. ENROLLMENT Statistics are based on the school's enrollment at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period. New students were new to the district in 216-17. They are counted as new if not enrolled in a district campus before the last day of the 21-16 school year. The retention rate is the percentage of students in the same grade at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period for both 21-16 and 216-17. ATTENDANCE Statistics are based on student attendance through the end of the sixth six-weeks grading period (the end of the school year). Average daily membership is the total number of school days students were SCHEDULED or ENROLLED divided by the number of school days in the year. The average daily attendance number (N) is the total number of school days students were IN ATTENDANCE divided by the number of school days in the year. The average daily attendance percentage (%) is the average attendance rate. For each student, the number of days attended is divided by the number of days enrolled. This rate is then averaged across students. The number (N) of yearly transactions is the total number of transfer and withdrawal transactions in the school year. The percentage (%) is the number of transactions divided by average daily membership, which gives (on average) the percentage of the membership associated with a transaction. Continuously enrolled students are enrolled and in attendance for a minimum number of instructional days in at least one course at the school between the beginning of the school year and the first day of the main STAAR testing period. The minimum number varies depending on the school year's calendar. The stability rate is the number of continuously enrolled students divided by average daily membership. TEACHERS Teacher demographics and location assignments are from the district's Public ation Information Management System (PEIMS) submission to the TEA. Teacher absences counted towards the average do not include vacation days. Retention rate is the percentage of the prior year's teachers who continued at the school. The rate for a school year is computed with numerator # of teachers assigned to the school both that year and the prior year and denominator # of teachers assigned to the school for the prior year. Teachers from the prior year are not included in the statistic if they changed to non-teaching positions within the district. Teacher statistics include all teachers at the campus. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_notes 217-18 Data Packet

2 Notes Notes, Definitions, and Data Descriptions STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC READINESS (STAAR) Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested. Student group assignments are from the district's Public ation Information Management System (PEIMS) submission to the TEA. STAAR statistics for years prior to 216-17 include results from all STAAR tests (STAAR, STAAR A, and STAAR L) for comparability to statistics beginning 216-17, when STAAR A and STAAR L were discontinued. Performance standard labels have changed. Approached Level is comparable to Level 2: Satisfactory (21-16 standard). Met Level is equivalent to Level 2: Satisfactory (final standard). Mastered Level is equivalent to Level : Advanced. Statistics for a performance level (such as Percentage Approached Level ) include all scores at or above that level. Statistics by reporting category are averages for all students (across student groups and genders). Average percentage correct is computed as follows: For each student, divide number of items correctly answered by total number of items in test section, then average resulting percentages across all students. For short answers on EOC English tests, an average rating is presented; STAAR EOC short answers are rated on a scale of to. For written compositions on writing tests, average score points is presented. Additional details provided in report footnotes. in report is grade level of assessment, not student's grade level. For example, grade 7 students in Pre-AP math or science courses are assessed with the 8 Math or 8 Science assessment. These students' scores are reflected in the row for 8. Statistics for SSI grades and 8 are based on scores cumulative through students' second administrations. TELPAS Students are counted as having tested if any one of the four domains is rated. Because a TELPAS composite rating is not assigned to a student unless all four domains are rated, the number of TELPAS composite ratings may be smaller than the number tested. If a student's composite rating did not increase at least one level from 216 to 217, the TEA did not report the 216 composite rating. If a student is rated as advanced high in 217, the TEA does not differentiate between the advanced and advanced high levels from 216. DALLAS ISD ASSESSMENTS OF COURSE PERFORMANCE (ACP) Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested. ACPs are semester exams administered in grades K-12. Not all courses have ACPs. In secondary grades, ACP scores account for a portion of students' semester grades (1% at middle and 1% at high). Average course mark (no ACP) is computed from semester grades before factoring in ACP scores. In elementary grades, ACP results account for % of students' semester grades for core courses; course-grade statistics are not reported in packets for elementary grades. Raw scores on the ACPs (percentage of items correct) are scaled each year to maintain similar annual passing rates for the district. A scale score of at least 7% is required to pass an ACP. For grade levels with numeric grading, a course mark of at least 7% is required to pass a course. Statistics are computed separately for Semester 1 and Semester 2 tests; time of administration during the school year is not relevant. Results from tests written for different school years are not combined. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_notes 217-18 Data Packet

Summary 216-17 Group Summary Statistics STUDENT ENROLLMENT Enrollment PK 8 KN 61 1 7 2 82 7 121 111 ALL 7 Ethnicity/Race Black/ ican ican Indian/Alaska Native Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Multiple STUDENT AND TEACHER RACE/ETHNICITY Students Number Percent Number Percent 78 1.. 2. 6 81.9 1 2. 8 1. Teachers 1 2.8 * * * * 1 1. 19.2. Other* (teachers only). Not reported (students only). *For teachers, Other category includes ican Indican/Alaska Native and Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. SELECT STUDENT GROUP ENROLLMENT Group Number Percent At-Risk. omically disadvantaged 97 89.2 Limited English proficient (LEP) 28. education 6. Talented and Gifted (TAG) 1 18. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_summary 217-18 Data Packet

Enroll (1) Enrollment Statistics by Race/Ethnicity ican ican Indian Asian Multiple category Enrollment N % N % N % N % N % N % PK KN 1 2 PK- 21 216 217 21 216 217 21 216 217 21 216 217 21 216 217 21 216 217 21 216 217 21 216 217 7 8 8 1.6 1. 1.2...... 2 2 89. 87. 86.8 1. 2.1.... 77 11 1... 6 8. 1 1.. 6 1.9.. 9 89.1.. 61 7 11... 86.9. 1 1.6 8 8 1.8.. 9 8. 1 1.7. 77 1 1... 66 8.7 1 1.. 7 8 11... 61 87.1. 1 1. 87 12 1.8.. 7 86.2.. 6 8 12... 7 87.7.. 82 9 11... 71 86.6 2 2.. 7 1 17.8.. 7 78.1 2 2.7 1 1. 82 1 12.2.. 72 87.8.. 7 8 1.8.. 62 8.8.. 1 28 21.1 1.8 1.8 1 7.2 2.. 12 18 17.6.. 77 7. 6.9 1 1. 121 19 1.7. 2 1.7 9 78. 2 1.7 2. 1 128 111 27 2 22 2.1 18.8 19.8 1..8. 1 1.7.8. 97 99 81 72. 77. 7. 8 6. 2.. 1.7. 2.7 69 1 17.1 1.2 2. 8 79.6 1 2. 2. 7 81 1. 1.2 1.2 62 82.9 11 2. 1.2 7 78 1.. 2. 6 81.9 1 2. 8 1. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_enroll_eth 217-18 Data Packet 6

Enroll (2) Enrollment Statistics by Select Student Group Enrollment omically antaged N % LEP ation At RIsk TAG N % N % N % N % New (to District) N % Gender % Male % Female Retention Rate (%) 21 7 6 97.9 2 2.6 7 1.9 2 2.6. 6 97.9 8.9 1.1. PK 216 8 7 97.9 2. 6. 2 2.1. 7 97.9 7.9 2.1 2.1 217 8 8 1. 2 2.6 7 18. 2 2.6. 6 9.7 7.7 26.. 21 77 7 9.9 2 2. 7 9.1 2 2. 2 2.6 28 6. 1.9 8.1. KN 216 7 8. 27 9.1 8 1. 27 9.1. 9.1.9 9.1. 217 61 1 8.6.1 2..7. 12 19.7 2.6 7.. 21 8 9.8 1. 8 1.8 6.9. 1 1.7 6.6.. 1 216 77 7 9.8 9. 6 7.8 1. 6. 2 2.6.. 2.6 217 7 9 8. 1. 6 8.6 8.6 7 1. 9 12.9 2.9 7.1 1. 21 87 81 9.1 6..6 7 8. 6 6.9.6 8. 1.7 1.1 2 216 6 6 96.9 2 9.2 6 9.2 2. 6.2 1 1. 8. 61. 1. 217 82 7 91. 7.1 6.1 9 7.6 8 9.8.7.9.1. 21 7 69 9. 26.6.1 68. 6 8.2.1.8.2 1. 216 82 78 9.1 6.9 6.1 6 76.8 12 1.6 2 2..9 6.1. 217 7 68 91.9.6 7 9. 6 8.6 8 1.8 2 2.7 1.9 8.1. 21 1 126 9.7 9.8 8 6. 76 7.1 26. 11 8. 6.6..8 216 12 91 89.2 2 1. 2.9 2. 1. 1 9.8.1.9. 217 121 19 9.1 6 6. 6. 76 62.8 9 2.2 7.8 2.2 67.8. 21 1 12 89.6.6 7.2 76 6.7 26.1.7 1.8 8.2. 216 128 122 9. 9.1 2. 78 6.9 9. 2 1.6 2.2 7.8. 217 111 97 87. 8.2 2 1.8 6 7.7 8.2 7 6. 6.9 6.1. 21 69 67 9.1 2 9. 7.2 7. 8 1.8 98 16.1 7.6 2..8 PK- 216 7 21 9. 21 1. 6.1 11.8 9 16.9 69 12...6.7 217 7 97 89.2 28. 6.. 1 18. 76 1.6..7. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_enroll_oth 217-18 Data Packet 7

Attendance Student Attendance Statistics Average Daily Membership Average Daily Attendance ly Transactions Continuously Enrolled Stability Rate N District N % District N District % N % District % N District % District 21 78 1,28 7 9.7 12,67 9. 6 7.7 19.2 7 11,627 9. 87. KN 216 6 12,18 9.8 11,68 9. 8 1. 19. 1 1,88 9.9 89. 217 9 11,88 7 96.2 1,888 9.6 8. 19.6 7 1,2 9.9 89.9 21 7 1,98 96. 1,7 96.1 6 1. 18.1 12, 9.7 88.7 1 216 76 1,97 7 9.6 12,877 96.1.9 18.1 72 12,66 9.7 9.1 217 69 12,278 66 9.9 11,8 96.1.8 18. 66 11,169 96.1 91. 21 87 1,916 8 96. 1,22 96..6 16.6 82 12, 9.9 89. 2 216 6 1,2 62 97. 1,66 96.6 6.2 16.6 61 12,286 9.7 9.8 217 81 12,98 78 96. 12,76 96. 7 8.7 16.9 77 11,8 9. 91.6 21 7 1,27 7 96. 12,79 96.6 6.9 16.2 67 11,91 92.2 9. 216 81 1,28 78 96. 12,911 96.9 7 8.7 1. 78 12,216 96. 91.7 217 71 1,18 69 96.8 12,7 96.8 7 9.9 1.9 66 12,162 9.1 92. 21 1 12,7 129 96.9 12, 96.9 7.2 16.2 127 11,2 9.1 9. 216 1 12,688 1 96.9 12, 96.9.8 1.8 1 11,676 96.9 92. 217 122 12,87 118 97.2 12,67 96.8. 1. 119 11,9 97.9 92.9 21 1 12,122 1 97.2 11,77 96.9. 6.6 1 11,2 97.1 91.2 216 1 12,178 12 96.8 11,81 97. 1.8.7 126 11,217 97. 92.1 217 11 12,22 17 97.7 11,88 96.9 1.9 6.1 18 11,67 98. 9. 21 6 79,286 96. 76,17 96. 2.7 1.6 7,967 9.7 89. KN- 216 1 77,8 92 96. 7,68 96. 28. 1.2 88 7, 9.6 91. 217 11 7,8 9 96.8 72,2 96. 28. 1. 9 68,71 96. 91.8 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_attendance 217-18 Data Packet 8

Teachers Teacher Statistics Teachers: 2 DISTRIBUTIONS Ethnicity/Race ican Multiple Other Gender Female Male 21-1 21-16 216-17 Number 1 1 19 Number ATTENDANCE / RETENTION 8 Average Absences 6. 7.. Percentage 2.8 1..2.. Percentage 81. 19. Retention Rate 69.8 8. YEARS EXPERIENCE s Beginning () 1 2 1-1 - 6-1 11-2 More than 2 Number 2 1 12 16 7 1 7 Percentage.8 11.9 9. 7.1 7.1 2. 28.6 More than 28 66.7 8.1 16.7 2.8 16.7 NOTE: Statistics include all teachers at the campus. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_teacher 217-18 Data Packet 9

-8 (EN) Read (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 6.2 66.7 62. * * 6.2 7.. 6. 9.1 6 216. 6.7 6. * * 1.7 9.1 6.9 6. 8.1 217 * 62. 67.7 9. 28.6 * 7.1 *.8 77.8 6.1 9. 21 * 7.1 77.8 66.7 1. 66.7.1 6. 78. 71..9 87 216 1. 8. 8.2 8. * 91.7 7.6 82.9 87.2 8. 62.6 82 217 * 89. 82.8 86. 66.7 89. 7. 8. 87. 8.7 6. 8 21 1. 88.9 89.7 89. 66.7 86.7 8. 86. 9. 9. 7.6 1 216 * 79.2 88.9 8.2 * 88. 78.2 8. 89. 86.7 7.6 128 217 * 9.9 91.1 9. * 92.1 87. 92. 91. 91.7 71.7 19 21 92. 67.6 82. 77.7 1. 8.2 69.6 76.2 82.1 79. 6. 267-216 88.9 7.1 8.2 8.. 87. 7.9 78.2 8.1 81.6 6.9 2 217 81.8 8.7 8.9 8. 6.7 88. 8.7 * 8.2 87. 8.7 62.7 26 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 21 1 68 181 22 16 7 1 122 1 267 216 9 2 191 226 9 6 11 11 1 2 217 11 9 168 2 1 61 19 1 86 1 26 22, 22,29 2,8 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_per_app 217-18 Data Packet 1

-8 (EN) Read (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 7 1 1 * * 1 6 11 17 2,981 6 216 6 12 17 * * 1 9 9 18,11 217 * 1 1 * * 9 6 1,1 21 * 12 12 22 6 1 1 1 2,197 87 216 9 1 * 1 1 6 6 12 2,728 82 217 * 2 1 1 2 2 1 7 12,2 8 21 1 1 2 6 12 8 1 2, 1 216 * 11 17 * 6 17 9 8 17 2,29 128 217 * 2 7 9 * 8 6 9 2,269 19 21 1 22 2 11 9 1 29 26 8,182 267-216 1 1 2 6 8 1 2 2 7 8,16 2 217 2 7 27 8 7 21 * 17 19 6 8,66 26 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 21 1 68 181 22 16 7 1 122 1 267 216 9 2 191 226 9 6 11 11 1 2 217 11 9 168 2 1 61 19 1 86 1 26 22, 22,29 2,8 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_num_not_app 217-18 Data Packet 11

-8 (EN) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 1.. 27. * * 11..8 1.6. 26. 6 216 2. 2.7 2. * * 2.1 22.7 26.1 2. 29.2 217 * 2.. 29.7 1. * 1. * 2. 7. 2.6 2.9 21 * 2..2.. 22.2 12. 17.1.. 27. 87 216 1.. 9.1.6 *. 2. 1. 8.9. 28.6 82 217 * 2.1 8. 7.. 7.9 1.. 8.1 8.8 2. 8 21 87. 8.1 9.2.7. 28.9 28.6.9..8 29.2 1 216 *. 61.6 7. * 6..6.7 6. 6.2 6. 128 217 * 6.6 6. 6.6 *. 2.9. 69.6 6.2 8.2 19 21 8.6 2. 6. 6.2. 28.1 21..2 2.1 9. 27.7 267-216 88.9 8. 1. 7. 11.1.7.8 7..1.6 1. 2 217 6.6 9...2 26.7.8. * 7.7 6...6 26 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 21 1 68 181 22 16 7 1 122 1 267 216 9 2 191 226 9 6 11 11 1 2 217 11 9 168 2 1 61 19 1 86 1 26 22, 22,29 2,8 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_per_met 217-18 Data Packet 12

-8 (EN) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 7.7 2. 2. * *.8. 9.1 21.7 1.1 6 216. 8.6 7. * * 6.9. 8.7 6.7 1.2 217 * 12. 19. 1. 1. * 1. * 2. 1.8 18.6 2. 21 * 1.7 2. 18.2. 11.1 6. 9.8 28. 19. 12.2 87 216 66.7 22.2 2.6 22.1 * 8. 2.9 28.6 2. 26.8 1. 82 217 * 1. 22. 2. 16.7 26. 12.8 2. 22.2 22.6 16.9 8 21 87. 1.8 2.7 21.2. 1. 11.7 22.8 29.9 26.9 1.2 1 216 * 2. 2.2 2. * 16. 1. 1.1.7 26.6 16.6 128 217 * 6... * 1.6 22.2... 19. 19 21 76.9 11.8 22.7 2.1. 12. 8.9 2. 26.2 2.6 1.2 267-216 66.7 19.2 21. 2.. 1.6 7.8 17. 27.6 2.1 1.1 2 217. 22.. 28. 1. 29. 18. * 29.1.7.1 18.8 26 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE - 21 1 68 181 22 16 7 1 122 1 267 216 9 2 191 226 9 6 11 11 1 2 217 11 9 168 2 1 61 19 1 86 1 26 22, 22,29 2,8 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_per_mst 217-18 Data Packet 1

-8 (EN) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): READING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Understanding Across Genres (GR -) 1. Understanding/Analysis Across Genres (GR 6-8) 2. Understanding/Analysis of Literary Texts. Understanding/Analysis of Informational Texts 21 6.9 7. 62.1 216 62.6 8.8 1.9 217 6.7 61.6 7. 21 6.9 67.8 6.7 216 79.6 71. 68.1 217 7.9 7.6 66.8 21 7. 76. 71.9 216 7. 7. 7.6 217 76. 78. 79.1 21 67.8 7.1 66.6-216 7. 7. 68. 217 7.7 72. 7.8 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_read_obj 217-18 Data Packet 1

-8 (EN) Writing (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 67.9 7. 67.7 1.. 8.7 66.7 78. 72.9 7.9 8 216 1..6 66.7 66.2 * 69.2. 8.8 72. 67.1 7. 8 217 * 78.9 69.1 7.6. 6.7 8. 6. 78.8 7.1. 81 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 28 2 6 7 8 1 9 6 8 216 6 18 6 71 2 1 6 1 8 217 2 19 71 6 17 6 29 2 81 7,21 7,29 7, August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_per_app 217-18 Data Packet 1

-8 (EN) Writing (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 9 1 21 6 19 1 1 2,1 8 216 8 2 2 * 2 1 1 28,9 8 217 * 17 18 6 1 1 11 21, 81 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 28 2 6 7 8 1 9 6 8 216 6 18 6 71 2 1 6 1 8 217 2 19 71 6 17 6 29 2 81 7,21 7,29 7, August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_num_not_app 217-18 Data Packet 16

-8 (EN) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 2. 21.2 2.6. 12. 6. 7.7 9.1 2.7 19. 8 216 1.. 8. 9. * 6.2 22.2 8.2.1 2. 28.7 8 217 * 6.8 7..1 16.7 1.2 27.8 8. 6.2 6.9 26. 81 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 28 2 6 7 8 1 9 6 8 216 6 18 6 71 2 1 6 1 8 217 2 19 71 6 17 6 29 2 81 7,21 7,29 7, August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_per_met 217-18 Data Packet 17

-8 (EN) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 *..8.6. 12..2. 8.7.7.1 8 216 8. 11.1 2. 2. * 8. 16.7 2.6 29. 2.9 1.9 8 217 * 1. 18.2 16.9 16.7 11.8.6 17.2 19.2 18. 7. 81 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 28 2 6 7 8 1 9 6 8 216 6 18 6 71 2 1 6 1 8 217 2 19 71 6 17 6 29 2 81 7,21 7,29 7, August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_per_mst 217-18 Data Packet 18

-8 (EN) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): WRITING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Composition¹ GR : Personal Narrative GR 7: Expository 1. Composition¹ GR : Expository GR 7: Personal Narrative 2. Revision. Editing 21.6. 9.7 8.8 216.2 67.1 66. 217. 7. 69. ¹Average score points (range -8). A composition is rated tw ice on a scale of 1 to, and the ratings are summed to determine score points for the composition. Score point scale: =Nonscorable; 2=Very Limited; =betw een Very Limited and Basic; =Basic; =betw een Basic and Satisfactory; 6=Satisfactory; 7=betw een Satisfactory and Accomplished; 8=Accomplished NOTE: Beginning in 216, only one composition w as required. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_write_obj 217-18 Data Packet 19

-8 (EN) Math (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 61. 8.9 81. * 88. 7. 8.6 7.8 8.6 6.8 72 216 6. 7. 72.7 * 8.6 7.6 7.7 71.1 7.2 6. 82 217 * 62. 8.6 7. 28.6 8.8 8.6 * 66.7 81.8 7.7 7. 7 21 * 6.7 81. 76.8 12. 79.2 67.1 67.7 8. 76.7 6. 1 216 1. 61.1 68. 6.9 * 7.9 2.9 6.1 71. 69. 6. 1 217 * 7.7 7.7 76.9. 71. 68. 76.9 7.6 76. 68.1 121 21 1. 7.1 81. 78.8. 86.7 7.7 86. 77.9 81. 66. 1 216 * 79.2 9.9 88.7 * 92. 82.1 77. 96. 88. 79.6 128 217 * 86. 91. 9. * 9.7 8.9 87.8 92.8 9.9 8.6 11 21 92. 66.2 81.8 78.6 2. 8.7 71.1 78. 8.1 79. 6. 9-216 88.9 69.2 79. 77. 6. 8. 71.9 72.9 81.8 78.1 69. 1 217 72.7 77.6 81.9 8.8. 81.9 77. * 78.2 8.1 81. 72.7 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 21 1 68 2 29 17 12 192 18 181 9 216 9 2 26 277 11 19 192 1 176 1 217 11 9 27 271 1 127 176 1 11 19 6,96 6,99 7,278 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_per_app 217-18 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Math (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 9 12 * 1 6 8 1,62 72 216 18 21 * 7 16 9 1 22,78 82 217 * 12 18 7 * 1 8 18,81 7 21 * 11 19 26 7 11 2 2 11 1,897 1 216 7 2 29 * 6 2 1 16 1,6 1 217 * 2 2 16 2 9 2 29,16 121 21 7 18 2 6 2 8 17 2,98 1 216 * 9 1 * 1 12 1 2,12 128 217 * 7 9 * 2 9 1 2,8 11 21 1 2 6 6 1 2 8 6 7 1,7 9-216 1 16 1 6 7 17 6 2 68 11, 1 217 11 2 9 2 * 2 7 1,17 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 21 1 68 2 29 17 12 192 18 181 9 216 9 2 26 277 11 19 192 1 176 1 217 11 9 27 271 1 127 176 1 11 19 6,96 6,99 7,278 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_num_not_app 217-18 Data Packet 21

-8 (EN) Math () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 * 7.7 7. 2. *. 22. 8. 27.. 28.2 72 216 1. 8.6.2 * 2.8. 1. 7.8.9 2.6 82 217 * 2. 61. 2.9 1.. 2.8 *. 9.1. 9.9 7 21 * 2. 2. 2.. 2. 17.1 17.7 29.6 2.1 22. 1 216 1. 22.2 2. 28.2 * 21.7 9.8.9 26.8. 28.9 1 217 * 1.6.2...9..8 7.8. 9. 121 21 87. 18. 2. 6.. 6.7. 2.1. 1.. 1 216 * 2.8 6..7 * 2. 28.2 28. 7..6. 128 217 *. 61. 8.9 * 6.. 8. 6.8 61.8 2. 11 21 61. 19.1.6 1.2..8 2. 1.6.7 2.7 27. 9-216 66.7 19.2 6.6.7 9.1 1. 28.6 6.8.1.2 2. 1 217 72.7.8. 1. 26.7 7.2. *. 1.8 2.8. NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 21 1 68 2 29 17 12 21 18 181 9 216 9 2 26 277 11 19 192 1 176 1 217 11 9 27 271 1 127 176 1 11 19 6,96 6,99 7,278 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_per_met 217-18 Data Packet 22

-8 (EN) Math () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 *. 2. 21. * 2. 12.2.8 12.1 22.2 9. 72 216. 22.2 18.2 * 2. 17. 27. 1. 19. 12. 82 217 * 2. 2..9 1. 6.. * 6.7 27. 1.1 19.9 7 21 * 1.. 7.1..8 2.6 1.6 9.9 6. 1.1 1 216 66.7 11.1 16. 17.6 * 17. 7.8 18.6 17.9 18. 1.6 1 217 *. 2. 18. 16.7 16.1 11.8 2.6 1.9 19. 22.1 121 21 62.. 1. 8.. 11.1 6.6 1. 11.7 11.2 11.8 1 216 *. 7.1.2 * 8..1.7.. 1.9 128 217 * 9.1 2. 2.2 * 18. 1.1 2. 2.6 2. 19. 11 21 6.2.9 11.1 1.8. 9.8 6. 12. 11. 11. 1. 9-216..8 1.2 12.6. 1.6 9.9 1.8 11. 1.2 1.6 1 217. 1.2 2.9 2.6 2. 22. 17. * 28.2 21. 2.9 2. NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE - 21 1 68 2 29 17 12 21 18 181 9 216 9 2 26 277 11 19 192 1 176 1 217 11 9 27 271 1 127 176 1 11 19 6,96 6,99 7,278 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_per_mst 217-18 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Math () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): MATHEMATICS AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Numerical Representations and Relationships 2. Computations and Algebraic Relationships. Geometry and Measurement. Data Analysis and Personal Financial Literacy 21 66. 6. 62.8 6.7 216 7. 6.9 68. 6.6 217 68. 7.6 6. 66.2 21 7. 9. 9.. 216 71. 62.7 8. 61.2 217 7.6 6.9 7.9 68. 21 8.2 62. 6. 66.8 216 62.1 6.8 9.8 6.7 217 72.1 7. 72.8 7. 21 6.9 6.8 8. 61.2-216 67.2 6. 8. 6.6 217 71.8 69.2 6.9 68. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_math_obj 217-18 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Science (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 87. 9. 6.8 61.1 16.7 6.1. 67.9 6. 6.6 7.1 128 216 * 7.8 77.8 7.8 * 6. 6.1 77. 77. 77. 66.1 128 217 * 68.2 71.6 69. * 6.8 6.9 6.9 7.7 72.1 6.9 111 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 8 27 91 11 6 9 7 7 128 216 2 99 11 9 78 7 128 217 22 81 9 2 8 6 1 7 111 9, 9,626 9,79 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_per_app 217-18 Data Packet 2

-8 (EN) Science (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 1 11 2 1 17 27 9 128 216 * 7 22 29 * 17 28 12 17 29 26 128 217 * 7 2 29 * 1 28 1 17 1 28 111 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 8 27 91 11 6 9 7 7 128 216 2 99 11 9 78 7 128 217 22 81 9 2 8 6 1 7 111 9, 9,626 9,79 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_num_not_app 217-18 Data Packet 26

-8 (EN) Science () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 87. 1.8 16. 1.9. 1. 7.1 17. 2. 21.9 21.8 128 216 * 2. 27. 27. * 1. 1.1 22.6 2. 28.1 26.7 128 217 * 27..6 1.6 * 28.9 21. 9. 1..2. 111 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 8 27 91 11 6 9 7 7 128 216 2 99 11 9 78 7 128 217 22 81 9 2 8 6 1 7 111 9, 9,626 9,79 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_per_met 217-18 Data Packet 27

-8 (EN) Science () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 7..7 2.2 1.8....7..7 6. 128 216 *.2.1. *.1 2.6.8 6.7. 6.7 128 217 *..9. *. 1. 7..7 6. 12.8 111 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 8 27 91 11 6 9 7 7 128 216 2 99 11 9 78 7 128 217 22 81 9 2 8 6 1 7 111 9, 9,626 9,79 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_per_mst 217-18 Data Packet 28

-8 (EN) Science () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (English): SCIENCE AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Matter and Energy 2. Force, Motion, and Energy. Earth and Space. Organisms and Environments 21 6.7 6.8 8.9 6. 216 71.9 66.8 68. 67.8 217 62.9 9.6 7.9 68.6 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_e_sc_obj 217-18 Data Packet 29

-8 (SP) Read (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 8.2 8.6 82.6 8. 81. 9.9 8.2 66. 27 216 8.8 82. * 82. 82. 8. 86. 8.8 66. 7 217 71. 71. 69. 69. 6. 76. 71. 66. 1 21 76.1 76.1 * 77. 77. 71. 8. 76.1 6.2 6 216 68. 72.2 6.6 66.7.6 77.8 68. 61.2 19 217 6.9 61.8 6.9 6.9 66.7 6. 6.9 6.2 7 21 79. 79.2 * 79.1 79. 7.7 8. 79. 7.1 7-216 78.6 78.8 * 77.8 76.9 7.8 8.9 78.6 68. 6 217 67.6 66.2 66.7 66.7 6.2 68.9 67.6 71. 68 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 21 7 72 1 67 68 7 6 7 216 6 2 2 2 2 1 6 217 68 6 66 66 2 68 1,919 1,879 1,762 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_per_app 217-18 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Read (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 1 1,922 27 216 6 6 * 6 6 6 1,9 7 217 9 9 9 9 9 1,887 1 21 11 11 * 1 1 6 11 1,867 6 216 6 6 2 6 1,97 19 217 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,8 7 21 1 1 * 1 1 9 6 1,8 7-216 12 11 * 1 12 7 12,7 6 217 22 22 22 22 8 1 22,28 68 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 21 7 72 1 67 68 7 6 7 216 6 2 2 2 2 1 6 217 68 6 66 66 2 68 1,919 1,879 1,762 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_num_not_app 217-18 Data Packet 1

-8 (SP) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21. 2. 9.1 7. 7.... 27 216 6.9 6.7 * 61.8 61.8 6. 68.2 6.9 6.9 7 217 1.6 1.6 8. 8.. 2.9 1.6 9.2 1 21.. * 1.8 1.8. 28.. 29.8 6 216 2.1. 27. 8.9 22.2.6 2.1. 19 217.1..1.1 22.2 9..1 6. 7 21.6.7 *..8.1 6.1.6 2. 7-216 7.1 7.7 *..8.8 6. 7.1 8.2 6 217 2.6.1.9.9 9.1. 2.6.8 68 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES - 21 7 72 1 67 68 7 6 7 216 6 2 2 2 2 1 6 217 68 6 66 66 2 68 1,919 1,879 1,762 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_per_met 217-18 Data Packet 2

-8 (SP) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 22.2 2.1 21.7 2.8 18.8 27. 22.2 16.1 27 216.2 1.2 * 1.2 1.2...2 21. 7 217.2.2.8.8. 1.2.2 2. 1 21 1.2 1.2 * 1.9 1.9 1. 16. 1.2 11.6 6 216 1. 11.1..6 11.1 11.1 1. 16.6 19 217 1.8 11.8 1.8 1.8 11.1 1.7 1.8 17. 7 21 17.8 18.1 * 17.9 17.6 16.2 19. 17.8 1. 7-216 2.1.8 * 1.1 28.8 29.2. 2.1 17. 6 217 26. 27.7 2.8 2.8.8 22.2 26. 21.9 68 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE - 21 7 72 1 67 68 7 6 7 216 6 2 2 2 2 1 6 217 68 6 66 66 2 68 1,919 1,879 1,762 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_per_mst 217-18 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Read () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): READING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Understanding Across Genres 2. Understanding/Analysis of Literary Texts. Understanding/Analysis of Informational Texts 21 7.1 67.9 6.1 216 8. 7.1 7.9 217 78.1 6.8 68. 21 6.1 66.1 61. 216 6.2 62. 6.2 217 9.1 69. 6. 21 67.8 66.7 62. - 216 76.8 67. 68. 217 67.8 67.7 6. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_read_obj 217-18 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Writing (1) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING PERCENTAGE APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 68.1 68.1 * 68.9 68.9 72.7 6. 68.1 67.9 7 216. 6. *..... 71.7 18 217 67. 67.6 66.7 67. 7. 66.7 67. 7. NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 7 7 1 22 2 7 216 18 16 1 1 18 11 6 18 217 7 9 1,27,116,27 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_per_app 217-18 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Writing (2) State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING NUMBER NOT APPROACHED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 1 1 * 1 1 6 9 1 1,68 7 216 9 7 * 7 9 6 9 1,9 18 217 1 12 1 1 1 1 1,8 NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 7 7 1 22 2 7 216 18 16 1 1 18 11 6 18 217 7 9 1,27,116,27 6 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_num_not_app 217-18 Data Packet

-8 (SP) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING PERCENTAGE MET GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 29.8 29.8 * 28.9 28.9 22.7 6. 29.8.2 7 216 16.7 18.8 * 1. 16.7 9.1 16.7 16.7 9.1 18 217 2..2 1. 2. 2.. 2.. NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 7 7 1 22 2 7 216 18 16 1 1 18 11 6 18 217 7 9 1,27,116,27 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_per_met 217-18 Data Packet 7

-8 (SP) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING PERCENTAGE MASTERED GRADE LEVEL STANDARD 21 6. 6. * 6.7 6.7. 8. 6. 7.2 7 216.. *..... 21.9 18 217 17. 16.2 1. 17. 2. 16.7 17. 1. NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 21 7 7 1 22 2 7 216 18 16 1 1 18 11 6 18 217 7 9 1,27,116,27 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_per_mst 217-18 Data Packet 8

-8 (SP) Writing () State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness -8 (Spanish): WRITING AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY REPORTING CATEGORY 1. Composition Personal Narrative¹ 1. Composition Expository¹ 2. Revision. Editing 21..2 9.1 69.8 216.6 61.1 8.8 217. 9.7 68.9 ¹Average score points (range -8). A STAAR composition is rated tw ice on a scale of 1 to, and the ratings are summed to determine score points for the composition. Score point scale: =Nonscorable; 2=Very Limited; =betw een Very Limited and Basic; =Basic; =betw een Basic and Satisfactory; 6=Satisfactory; 7=betw een Satisfactory and Accomplished; 8=Accomplished NOTE: Beginning in 216, only one composition w as required. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_staar8_s_write_obj 217-18 Data Packet 9

TELPAS 2 Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System 216-17 Domain: Listening PERFORMANCE IN 217 Speaking Writing Reading Composite Number Rated Both s (N Rated) 217 Level N % N % N % N % N % N (%) Progressed 217 Level PROGRESSION FROM 216 TO 217 Beg 216 Level Int Adv Adv High Beginning 12 6. 2 6.6 9.9 27 81.8 21 6.6 Beginning KN Intermediate 1. 9.1 2 6.1 9.1 9 27. Intermediate () Advanced 9.1 6 18.2. 2 6.1 2 6.1 Advanced Advanced High 8 2.2 12.1 1. 1. 1. Advanced High Beginning 9.7 12.9 1 2. 1 2. 8 2.8 Beginning 7 1 Intermediate 1 8. 18 8.1 1 8. 11. 1 1.9 Intermediate 1 (1) Advanced 9 29. 16.1 9.7 16.1 7 22.6 2 (76.7%) Advanced 2 Advanced High 12.9 12.9 9.7 16.1 9.7 Advanced High Beginning. 8.1 8 21.6 9 2. 7 18.9 Beginning 7 2 Intermediate 9 2. 1 7.8 17.9 17.9 1. 6 Intermediate 9 6 (7) Advanced 22 9. 19 1. 11 29.7 1. 1 27. 2 (.6%) Advanced 2 Advanced High 6 16.2 1 2.7 1 2.7 6 16.2 1. Advanced High 1 Beginning 2 6.1 2 6.1 1.2 1.2 12.1 Beginning Intermediate 6 18.2 1. 11. 12.1 1.2 Intermediate 1 () Advanced 1 2. 12 6. 9 27. 1 9. 12 6. 22 (66.7%) Advanced 9 Advanced High 11. 9 27. 8 2.2 11. 12 6. Advanced High 1 11 Beginning..... Beginning Intermediate 21 7..6 22 9. 1 2.2 1 26.8 Intermediate 2 1 (6) Advanced 1. 22 9. 29 1.8 19.9 28. 18 (2.7%) Advanced 2 Advanced High 7.1 7.1 8.9 21 7. 1 2.2 Advanced High 1 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_telpas 217-18 Data Packet

TELPAS 2 Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System 216-17 Domain: Listening PERFORMANCE IN 217 Speaking Writing Reading Composite Number Rated Both s (N Rated) 217 Level N % N % N % N % N % N (%) Progressed 217 Level PROGRESSION FROM 216 TO 217 Beg 216 Level Int Adv Adv High Beginning... 1 2.6. Beginning Intermediate 2. 1 2.6 7.9 2. 2. 7 Intermediate 1 1 (8) Advanced 16 2.1 17.7 19. 9 2.7 1 26. (91.9%) Advanced 1 7 2 Advanced High 2 2.6 2 2.6 16 2.1 26 68. 26 68. Advanced High 21 Beginning 17 7. 29 12.7 2.2 2.1 17. Beginning 18 ALL Intermediate 6 27.6 76. 7.7 21.9 9 2.9 191 Intermediate 26 2 (228) Advanced 9 1.7 81. 71 1.1 2.2 69. 117 (61.%) Advanced 8 2 2 Advanced High 2.2 2 18. 1.9 7.7 6 26. Advanced High 9 Indicates students w ho progressed at least one level from 216 to 217. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_telpas 217-18 Data Packet 1

IPT IDEA Proficiency Test PERCENTAGE BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 Level Level Level Level 6 Number N % N % N % N % Tested N % N % PK * * * * * * KN 9 * * * * * * * * 2 2 7 ALL * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 86. * * 6 11.1 6 11.1 * * * * 6. August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_ipt 217-18 Data Packet 2

ACP Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance SEMESTER 1 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing SEMESTER 2 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Elementary School Exams KINDERGARTEN MATHEMATICS 8 87.1 88.6 9.8 8.6 KINDERGARTEN READING KINDERGARTEN MATHEMATICS KINDERGARTEN READING 2 9.7 9.8 1. 92.8 KINDERGARTEN READING SPANISH KINDERGARTEN READING SPANISH 87.7 9. 97. 9. GRADE 1 MATHEMATICS GRADE 1 MATHEMATICS 69 8.7 86. 88. 82.8 GRADE 1 MATHEMATICS SPANISH GRADE 1 MATHEMATICS SPANISH 1 * * * 89.2 GRADE 1 READING GRADE 1 READING 8 81.8 86. 92.1 9. GRADE 1 READING SPANISH 2 88.8 88.8 9.8 91. GRADE 2 MATHEMATICS 81 67.8 78. 8.9 69.1 97. 8.7 91.6 GRADE 2 READING GRADE 1 READING SPANISH GRADE 2 MATHEMATICS GRADE 2 READING 2 72. 81.7 87.1 81. 9.2 77. 89. GRADE 2 READING SPANISH GRADE 2 READING SPANISH 9 7. 7. 8.1 6.1 1. 79.9 9.2 August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_acp 217-18 Data Packet

ACP Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance SEMESTER 1 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing SEMESTER 2 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course GRADE MATHEMATICS 71 6.7 7.8 79.8 6.6 9.1 6.9 88. GRADE READING 2 6.9 71. 8..8 9.8 6. 8.8 GRADE READING SPANISH GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE READING GRADE READING SPANISH 9 61. 7.2 78.8 61. 89.7 9.9 88.7 GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS 88 7. 77.9 87.2 72.7 9. 8. 9. GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS SPANISH GRADE LANGUAGE ARTS SPANISH 7.8 7.8 86.8 72.7 1. 67.8 9.2 GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE MATHEMATICS 121 61. 76.6 8. 7.2 98. 6.7 9. GRADE READING GRADE READING 88 7. 82.2 87.1 8. 97.7 68.1 9. GRADE READING SPANISH 6.7 76. 86.8 78.8 1. 7.8 9.2 GRADE MATHEMATICS 11 6.9 7.9 81.9 72.7 9. 6. 9.2 GRADE READING GRADE READING SPANISH GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE READING 1 79. 8.2 8. 9.2 97.1 7.8 9.8 GRADE READING SPANISH GRADE READING SPANISH * * * * * 7.7 * August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_acp 217-18 Data Packet

ACP Dallas ISD Assessments of Course Performance SEMESTER 1 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing SEMESTER 2 TESTS Averages % Passing District % Passing Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course Number Tested % Items Correct Scale Score Course Mark Course Mark (no ACP) ACP Course ACP Course GRADE SCIENCE 19 79. 79. 87.1 78.9 99.1 67.9 9. GRADE SCIENCE SPANISH 1 * * * * * 69.6 * GRADE SCIENCE GRADE SCIENCE SPANISH August 1, 217 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Assessment (Office of Institutional Research) rpt_acp 217-18 Data Packet