Michael J. Curtis, Alana D. Lopez, George M. Batsche, Devon Minch, & Dama Abshier. NASP Research Committee. University of South Florida

Similar documents
FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

Trends in College Pricing

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Anatomy and Physiology. Astronomy. Boomilever. Bungee Drop

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Brian Isetts University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Anthony W. Olson PharmD University of Minnesota, Twin Cities,

Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuities

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends


Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Educational Attainment

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Shelters Elementary School

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

CROSS-BATTERY ASSESSMENT, SLD DETERMINATION, AND THE ASSESSMENT- INTERVENTION CONNECTION

Career Services JobFlash! as of July 26, 2017

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Data Diskette & CD ROM

NC Community College System: Overview

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Findings from the 2005 College Student Survey (CSS): National Aggregates. Victor B. Saenz Douglas S. Barrera

Canada and the American Curriculum:

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Transportation Equity Analysis

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

University of Arizona

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Pathways to Health Professions of the Future

Plainview Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School 50 Kennedy Drive Plainview, NY Guidance Office: Fax:

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Raw Data Files Instructions

46 Children s Defense Fund

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

King-Devick Reading Acceleration Program

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

12-month Enrollment

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Jeffrey H. Diritto, M.S., CSCS, SCCC, USAW

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Members Attending: Doris Perkins Renee Moore Pamela Manners Marilyn McMillan Liz Michael Brian Pearse Dr. Angela Rutherford Kelly Fuller

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

Kimberly J. Hills Curriculum Vitae

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Bellevue University Admission Application

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

El Toro Elementary School

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Resume. Christine Ann Loucks Telephone: (208) (work)

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

University of Oregon College of Education School Psychology Program Internship Handbook

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

The Economic Impact of College Bowl Games

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Gena Bell Vargas, Ph.D., CTRS

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

James H. Walther, Ed.D.

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

EPA Approved Laboratories for UCMR 3

Mayo School of Health Sciences. Clinical Pastoral Education Internship. Rochester, Minnesota.

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

THIS KIT CONTAINS ALL THE INFORMATION YOU NEED

Transcription:

School Psychology, 2004-2005: National and Regional Demographic Characteristics, Professional Practices, Employment Conditions, & Continuing Professional Development Michael J. Curtis, Alana D. Lopez, George M. Batsche, Devon Minch, & Dama Abshier NASP Research Committee University of South Florida March, 2007

Historical Background Need for Data Legislators and Policy Makers Accrediting Bodies Funding Sources State Credentialing Agencies Training Programs Employers

Background (cont d) NASP Policy- National Study Every 5 Years to Describe Current Field and Track Changes over Time First three studies: 1989-1990: Graden & Curtis 1994-1995: Curtis, Hunley, Walker, & Baker 1999 2000: Curtis, Grier, Abshier, Sutton, & Hunley

Research Method Original Survey Instrument Development Pilot Testing by Practicing School Psychologists Leadership Review Expert Review Consistency of Core Over Time

Method (cont d) Current Survey Instrument (cont d) All Responses Based on 2004-2005 School Year 38 Items Items 1 18 Completed by All Respondents Items 19 38 Completed only by School Psychologists whose primary employment during 2004-2005 was full-time in school setting

Method (cont d) NASP Regular Members as Mailing List 20% Random Selection by State Incentives for Participation Ten Awards of 50 NASP Bucks Five Awards of One-Year NASP Membership* *Included in final mailing, but all respondents eligible

Method (cont d) Four mailings Complete Mailing: Letter, Survey, Return Envelope with Code Number Postcard Reminder Complete Mailing Complete Mailing* Confidentiality *Announcement of Free Membership Incentive

Method (cont d) NASP Generated List: 2,998 Names Corrected List: 2,948 Names Completed/Usable Surveys: 1,748 Response Rate = 59.3%

NASP Members & National Database VARIABLES 05 NASP Membership 2004-4-05 Database GENDER Female 73.5% 74.0% Male 26.5% 26.0% Percent Responding 63.7% 99.9% ETHNICITY Am. Indian /Alaska Nat. 0.9% 0.8% Asian-Am./Pacific Islander 1.4% 0.9% Black/African-Am. 3.1% 1.9% Hispanic 3.8% 3.0% White/Caucasian 88.5% 92.6% Other 2.4% 0.8% Percent Responding 73.8% 97.5% HIGHEST DEGREE Bachelors 1.2% 0.1% Master s 44.8% 32.6% Specialist 22.9% 34.9% Doctorate 28.0% 32.4% Percent Responding 80.4% 99.8% MEAN AGE in Years 50.9 46.2 Percent Responding 80.4% 99.8%

Demographic Characteristics Professional Roles Gender Ethnicity Age Preparation Credentialing

Context for Professional Practice Primary and Secondary Employment School District Setting Salary Length of Contract Ratio of Students to School Psychologist Percent Minority Students Served Supervision Continuing Professional Development

Professional Practices Initial Special Education Evaluations Special Education Reevaluations Total Percent Time in Spec. Education-Related Activities Consultation Counseling Student Groups In-service Programs

Demographic Characteristics

Professional Roles Practicing School Psychologist: 80.44% University Faculty: 6.04% Administrator: 5.39% State Department: 0.63% Other*: 7.60% *Behavioral Specialist, Educational Consultant, Counselor, Intervention Specialist

Gender Total Field Practitioners Female 74% 77% Male 26% 23%

Gender: Total Field 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1969-70 1980-81 1989-90 1999-2000 2004-2005 Male Female

Gender for University Faculty 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 80 60 49 51 40 18 1969-70* 1999-00 2004-2005 *As reported; does not equal 100% % Male % Female

Ethnicity for Total Field 1980-81 1989-90 1999-00 2004-05 African-Am 1.5% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% Caucasian 96% 93.9% 92.8% 92.6%* NatAm/AlasNat <1% 1.1% 0. 6% 0.8% Asian/Pacific Is. <1% 0.8% 0.6% 0.9% Hispanic 1.5% 1.5% 3.1% 3.0% Other <1% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% *Practitioners = 92.4%

Ethnicity for University Faculty Number Responding to Item = 104 Caucasian = 93.27% African American =.96% Hispanic = 5.77%

Percent Age: 40 or Younger and 50 or Older 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 <40 yrs =>50 yrs Total Field Practitioners Mean Age: Practitioners = 45.2 Total Field = 46.2

Highest Degree Earned Masters Specialist Doctorate Total Field 32.6% 34.9% 32.4% Practitioners 35.7% 39.9% 24.4%

Percent Preparation at Specialist Level* or Higher: Total Field 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 **80.5 69.7 1969-70 1980-81 1989-90 1999-00 2004-05 *60 Graduate Semester Hours **Practitioners = 79.7% Less than Specialist Specialist or Above

Percentages with State Credentials: Total Field 100 91.3 80 60 40 20 36.7 Certification Licensure 0 1989-90 1999-2000 2004-05

Licensure: Practitioners Only Doctoral Level License 13.92% Non-Doctoral License 16.70% *30.62% *Total Field = 36.7%

Context for Professional Practice Primary and Secondary Employment School District Setting Salary Length of Contract Ratio of Students to School Psychologist Percent Minority Students Served Supervision Continuing Professional Development

Primary Employment Setting Public Schools: 83.1% Private Schools: 5.2% Faith-Based Schools: 2.1% University: 6.5% Independent Practice: 4.1% Hospital/Medical: 1.3% State Department: 0.8% Other: 2.8% Note: >100% because multiple choices possible

Secondary Employment Settings Public Schools: 3.27% Private Schools: 0.75% Faith-Based Schools: 0.23% University: 7.78% Ind Practice: 8.59% State Dept: 0.29% Hospital: 0.40% Other: 1.95% Note: 22.5% engage in some form of secondary employment

Full-Time School-Based Practice The following data are based on responses to survey items 19 through 38 by 1,398 school psychologists who were employed full-time in a school setting (public, private or faith-based, preschool through high school)

School Setting Urban = 28.4% Suburban = 50.2% Rural = 28.8% Note: >100% because more than one choice possible

Contracts and Salary Contracts: 50.4% have contracts of 180 to 190 days 33.6% have contracts of 200 days or more Practitioners Mean Per Diem Salary = $312.57 180 days = $56,262 190 days = $59,387 200 days = $62,513 210 days = $65,639 220 days = $68,764 Mean Ed.S. Per Diem Salary = $287.03 Mean Ph.D. Per Diem Salary = $350.03

Ratio of Students: School Psychologist for District where Employed 60 50 40 30 20 1989-1990 1999-2000 2004-2005 10 0 < 1000 < 1500 > 2000 > 3000 Mean Ratio in 2004-2005 = 1482:1 (District) Mean # students responsible for serving = 1205:5

Services to Students Who are Members of Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups Nearly all school psychologists (98.24%) serve students who are members of racial/ethnic minority groups Almost one-half (47%) serve 25% or more minority students 28% serve 50% or more minority students Only 7.6% of school psychologists in sample are members of racial/ ethnic minority groups

Administrative Supervision Received Admin. Supervision: 48.96% Administrative Supervisor: Degree in School Psych = 33.27% Degree in Psychology = 8.90% Degree in Administration = 66.01% Masters/Specialist degree = 35.05% Doctoral degree = 24.73%

Clinical Supervision Received Clinical Supervision = 12.29% Clinical Supervisor: Degree in School Psychology = 54.6% Degree in Psychology = 37.6% Doctoral degree = 62.4% Masters/Specialist degree = 16.3%

Continuing Professional Development Respondents asked to indicate the top three CPD subject areas addressed in 2004-2005 3% endorsed more than three CPD areas 5% of the respondents endorsed less than three CPD areas

Rank Order Percent Identifying each CPD Subject Area N % Behavioral Interv 544 47.10% Stan Psychoed Assess 462 40.00% Acad Interv 381 32.99% Consult/Prob-solving 364 31.52% Social/Emot Interv 331 28.66% Response to Interv 304 26.32% Behavioral Assess 247 21.39% Acad Scr/Prog Mon 238 20.61% Social/Emot Assess 194 16.80% Crisis Interv 187 16.19% Other 173 14.98%

Professional Practices

Professional Practices Mean 504 Plans 5.9 Initial Evaluations 34.7 Reevaluations 34.3 Consultation Cases 42.2 Individual Counseling 9.9 Student in Groups 8.8 Student Groups 1.7 In-Service Programs 2.6 Total % of Time in Sped 80.4%

Change in Percent of Total Work Time in Special Education Activities 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 52.3 80.4 1989-1990 2004-2005

Race/Ethnicity Categories: African American Caucasian Hispanic Other (Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American/Alaska Native, and Other)

Race/Ethnicity: Demographic Characteristics No significant differences for: Gender Age Highest Degree Earned Years of Experience in School Psychology

Ethnicity: Employment Conditions No significant difference for: Ratio of Students to School Psychologist Significant differences for: % minority students served Hispanic (M= 65.9) > Other (M= 33.5) Hispanic (M= 65.9) > Caucasian (M= 31.1) African American (M= 60.8) > Caucasian (M= 31.1) School Setting Urban higher for Other Suburban lower for Other

Race/Ethnicity: Professional Practices No significant differences for: Initial Evaluations Reevaluations % of Total Time Related to Sp. Ed. In-Service Programs Consultation Cases Students Served via Individual Counseling Students Served via Groups

Regional Differences

U. S. Census Regions Northeast (NE): CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT Mid-Atlantic (MA): NJ, NY, PA South Atlantic (SA): DC, DE, FL, GA, MD, NC, SC, VA, WV East South Central (ESC): AL, KY, MS, TN East North Central (ENC): IL, IN, MI, OH, WI West South Central (WSC): AR, LA, OK, TX West North Central (WNC): IA, KS, MN, MO, ND, NE, SD Mountain (MTN): AZ, CO, ID, MT, NM, NV, UT, WY Pacific (PAC): AK, CA, HI, OR, WA

Total Sample by Census Region NE MA SA ESC ENC WSC WNC MTN PAC Region N 160 353 308 65 303 97 131 137 172 % 9.3 20.5 17.8 3.8 17.6 5.6 7.6 7.9 10.0 TOTAL 1,726* 100 *Respondents who reported state

Means for Demographic Characteristics by Region For Total Field Region Female (%) Male (%) Age Yrs Exp in School Psych NE 69% 31% 48 16 MA 72% 28% 44 14 SA 81% 19% 47 15 ESC 72% 28% 46 16 ENC 76% 24% 46 15 WSC 77% 23% 49 16 WNC 80% 20% 45 14 MTN 58% 42% 48 15 PAC 74% 26% 46 14

Ethnicity by Region for Total Field Region % AA % C % AI/AN % API % H % O NE 0.7 91.5 0.7 1.3 2.6 3.3 MA 3.2 91.9 0.6 0.6 3.5 0.3 SA 4.0 91.7 0.3 0.3 3.3 0.3 ESC 1.6 96.9 1.6 0 0 0 ENC 1.7 95.0 0.3 1.3 1.3 0.3 WSC 1.1 93.6 1.1 1.1 3.2 0 WNC 0 98.4 0.8 0.8 0 0 MTN 0 90.8 2.3 2.3 3.1 1.5 PAC 1.2 88.8 1.8 1.2 5.9 1.2. *AA=African American; C=Caucasian; AI/N American Indian/Alaskan Native; API= Asian/Pacific Islander; H=Hispanic; O=Other

Highest Degree Earned by Region for Total Field Region B (%) M (%) EdS (%) Doc (%) NE 0 24.2 45.2 30.6 MA 0 33.8 29.3 36.9 SA 0.3 16.6 52.6 30.5 ESC 0 16.9 52.6 30.5 ENC 0 43.2 30.4 26.4 WSC 0 34.0 17.5 48.5 WNC 0 29.8 45.8 24.4 MTN 0 24.1 35.8 40.1 PAC 0.1 32.7 35.0 32.3

Credentialing by Region for Total Field Region NCSP Doc Lic Psych Non-Doc Lic Sch Psy Doc Lic Sch Psy NE 49% 14% 14% 4% MA 35% 21% 4% 4% SA 59% 12% 15% 5% ESC 66% 26% 0% 12% ENC 55% 10% 14% 4% WSC 58% 26% 31% 17% WNC 51% 7% 7% 2% MTN 53% 19% 7% 6% PAC 39% 6% 13% 2%

The following data are for 1,390 school psychologists who reported working full- time in a school setting and who responded to Items 19 through 38 on the survey.

Full-Time School-Based Practicing School Psychologist Respondents by Region* N % Mid-Atlantic 290 20.86% East North Central 255 18.35% South Atlantic 245 17.63% Pacific 156 11.22% Northeast 131 9.42% Mountain 109 7.84% West North Central 98 7.05% West South Central 57 4.10% East South Central 49 3.53% Total 1390 *Respondents to Items 19 38 on Survey

Mean Contract Length and Salary for Full-Time School-Based Practice by Region Region Days in Contract Per Diem Salary Annual Salary (190 days) Annual Salary (200 days) MA 189 $353 $67,070 $70,600 PAC 195 $343 $65,170 $68,600 NE 186 $341 $64,790 $68,200 ENC 195 $315 $59,850 $63,000 MTN 193 $287 $54,530 $57,400 SA 208 $282 $53,580 $56,400 WNC 191 $268 $50,920 $53,600 ESC 203 $259 $49,210 $51,800 WSC 200 $252 $47,880 $50,400

Means for Professional Practices Related to Special Education by Region Region 504 Plans Initial Spec Ed Evals Spec Ed Re-Evals %Total Time Spec Ed NE 7 27 28 76 MA 7 30 28 80 SA 7 41 27 76 ESC 5 58 48 84 ENC 5 36 40 80 WSC 8 30 29 89 WNC 3 32 38 84 MTN 5 31 44 83 PAC 6 33 41 83

Means for Professional Practices Related to Direct & Indirect Services by Region Region Consultation Cases Individual Counseling Cases Students Served via Groups In-Service Programs NE 37 11 18 2 MA 35 10 9 2 SA 57 12 9 3 ESC 47 5 5 5 ENC 38 7 7 2 WSC 41 6 7 4 WNC 34 6 9 3 MTN 39 11 11 3 PAC 43 15 6 3

Mean Students to School Psychologist Ratio by Region Region District Ratio Ratio for Respondent ESC SA WSC PAC ENC MTN WNC MA NE 2257 2005 1864 1617 1528 1445 1417 1003 911 1908 1761 1092 1354 1325 1059 1178 740 738

Minority Students Served by Region SA MA WNC NE Region PAC WSC MTN ESC ENC % Minority Students in District 44 43 38 36 34 28 24 19 18 % Minority Students Served by Respondent 46 45 38 38 36 29 27 18 18

Percentages Receiving Supervision Percentages Receiving Supervision by Region by Region 6 48 48 PAC PAC 9 41 41 MTN MTN 7 48 48 WNC WNC 10 10 29 29 WSC WSC 9 45 45 ENC ENC 12 12 56 56 ESC ESC 9 48 48 SA SA 15 15 57 57 MA MA 34 34 54 54 NE NE Clinical Clinical Supervision Supervision Administrative Administrative Supervision Supervision Region Region

Limitations of the National Database Social desirability of responses Population validity NASP members Potential differences between responders and non- responders Data specific to 2004-2005 school year Retrospective survey data