State of New Jersey FOUNDATION ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL 363 WEST STATE STREET

Similar documents
State of New Jersey

Shelters Elementary School

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Kahului Elementary School

African American Male Achievement Update

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Educational Attainment

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Idaho Public Schools

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Engage Educate Empower

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

Review of Student Assessment Data

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

INTRODUCTION ( MCPS HS Course Bulletin)

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Junior Scheduling Assembly. February 22, 2017

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Hokulani Elementary School

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Bellehaven Elementary

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

World s Best Workforce Plan

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Freshman Admission Application 2016

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Raw Data Files Instructions

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Evaluation of Teach For America:

MINUTE TO WIN IT: NAMING THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES


FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

El Toro Elementary School

Apps4VA at JMU. Student Projects Featuring VLDS Data. Dr. Chris Mayfield. Department of Computer Science James Madison University

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Best Colleges Main Survey

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Transportation Equity Analysis

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

LIM College New York, NY

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

12-month Enrollment

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Transcription:

Page 1 of 42 OVERVIEW 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 0 806017932 The New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) is pleased to present these annual reports of Performance. These reports are designed to inform parents, educators and communities about how well a school is performing and preparing its students for college and careers. In particular, the Performance Reports seek to: Focus attention on metrics that are indicative of college and career readiness. Benchmark a school's performance against other peer schools that are educating similar students, against statewide outcomes, and against state targets to illuminate and build upon a school's strengths and identify areas for improvement. Improve educational outcomes for students by providing both longitudinal and growth data so that progress can be measured as part of an individual school's efforts to engage in continuous improvement. While the New Jersey Performance Reports seek to bring more information to educators and stakeholders about the performance of schools, they do not seek to distill the performance of schools into a single metric, a single score, or a simplified conclusion. Instead, the intention is that educators and stakeholders will engage in deep, lengthy conversations about the full range of the data presented As educators know well, measuring school performance is both an art and a science. While the Performance Report brings attention to important student outcomes, NJDOE does not collect data about other essential elements of a school, such as the provision of opportunities to participate and excel in extracurricular activities; the development of noncognitive skills like time management and perseverance; the pervasiveness of a positive school culture or climate; or the attainment of other employability and technical skills, as many of these data are beyond both the capacity and resources of schools to measure and collect well. To learn more about New Jersey s school accountability system, please visit: <http://www.nj.gov/education/educators/>.

DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Enrollment by Grade Enrollment Count 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 80 81 49 16 56 58 60 55 64 60 20 75 63 68 50 56 91 51 83 63 53 87 76 61 52 87 82 201213 201314 201415 Total Enrollment Trends Note: "UG" represents the count of students who are 'on roll' in this school but who are educated in ungraded classrooms, meaning that the classrooms may contain students from multiple grade 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 This graph presents the count of students who were 'on roll' by grade in October of each school year. 0 201213 201314 201415 Total Enrollment 365 544 788 Enrollment by Gender This graph presents the count of students by gender who were 'on roll' in October of each school year. 450 201213 201314 201415 04 KG 12 03 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 Male Female Percent of Enrollment 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 Enrollment Trends by Program Participation This graph presents the percentages of students by program participation who were on roll in October of each school year. 100 80 60 40 20 0 12 6 10 DISABILITY ECONDIS LEP Current Year Enrollment by Program Participation 0 Count of of 201415 Students Enrollment Students with Disability 83 85 82 201213 201314 201415 Economically Disadvantaged Students English Language Learners 1 1 3 77 10 643 81.6 22 2.8 806017932 Enrollment by Ethnic/Racial Subgroup This graph presents the percentages of enrollment for each subgroup defined by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Two or More Races 0.3 Pacific Islander 0.3 Asian 1.1 Hispanic 38.5 White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races 201415 Language Diversity This table presents the percentage of students who primarily speak each language in their home. Percent English 99.0 Spanish 0.9 Arabic 0.1 White 1.1 Black 58.6 00 201213 201314 201415 Male 182 254 379 Female 183 290 409 Page 2 of 42

Page 3 of 42 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 The Academic Achievement section measures the content knowledge that students have in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA/L), Mathematics and Biology as demonstrated in 20142015 Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) assessments and the EndofCourse Biology assessment. The below chart consist of three columns with measures. The first column wide Performance below includes the percentage of students who met or exceeded expectations in ELA/L or Math. The middle column Peer Percentile indicates how the school s outcomes compare to its group of peer schools. The last column Statewide Percentile indicates how the school s outcomes compare to schools across the state in ELA/L. Academic Achievement HS English Language Arts/Literacy Met or Exceeded Expectation HS Math Met or Exceeded Expectation wide Performance 43 90 59 32 Peer Percentile State Percentile ESEA Waiver English Language Arts/Literacy This table presents, for each subgroup in the school, the total number of valid test scores, the percentage of students who met or exceeded expectations, the assessment participation goal, and the participation rate. The participation goal is established as 95 by the United States Department of Education. Subgroups wide Valid Scores Meeting Standards Participation Goal Participation Rate Met Participation? 348 50 95 98.1 YES White African American Hispanic American Indian Asian Two or More Races Students with Disability English Learner Students 190 147 47.4 53.1 95 95 97.8 98.4 YES YES Economically Disadvantaged 280 49 95 97.9 YES Students YES* = Met Participation Rate (Participation Averaging applied) Data is presented for subgroups when the count is high enough under ESEA Waiver suppression rules.

Page 4 of 42 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 ESEA Waiver Math 806017932 This table presents, for each subgroup in the school, the total number of valid test scores, the percentage of students who met or exceeded expectations, the assessment participation goal, and the participation rate. The participation goal is established as 95 by the United States Department of Education. Subgroups wide Valid Scores Meeting Standards Participation Goal Participation Rate Met Participation? 349 34.1 95 98.3 YES White African American Hispanic American Indian Asian Two or More Races Students with Disability English Learner Students 191 147 26.7 42.8 95 95 97.8 98.8 YES YES Economically Disadvantaged 281 34.9 95 97.9 YES Students YES* = Met Participation Rate (Participation Averaging applied) Data is presented for subgroups when the count is high enough under ESEA Waiver suppression rules.

Page 5 of 42 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 This table presents the percentage of students who scored in the Advanced Proficient, Proficient and Partially Proficient categories of the New Jersey Biology Competency Test (NJBCT) in the latest school year. Partially Subgroups Advanced Proficient Proficient wide White African American Hispanic American Indian Asian Two or More Races Students with Disability English Language Learners Proficiency Outcomes Biology 7 39 54 0 40 60 Economically Disadvantaged 6 38 56 Students Data is presented for subgroups when the count is high enough under ESEA Waiver suppression rules. Proficiency Levels (in Percents) 100 2 2 80 60 40 20 0 Proficiency Trends Biology This graph presents the percentage of students who scored in the Advanced Proficient, Proficient, and Partially Proficient categories of the Biology Competency Test over the last four years. 35 63 47 51 201213 201314 201415 Advanced Proficient Partially Proficient Proficient 7 39 54

Page 6 of 42 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC Performance Level 806017932 The PARCC assesses how well students have learned gradelevel material in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA/L) and Math. The tests include questions that measure students fundamental skills and knowledge, and require them to think critically, solve problems and support or explain their answers. The PARCC reports students overall scale scores that range from 650 to 850. To determine whether students have met academic expectations for their grade level/course in ELA/L and Math, students overall scale scores are categorized into five Performance Levels. Students performing at levels 4 and 5 (met or exceeded expectations) have demonstrated readiness for the next grade level/course, and are on track for college and careers. Five Performance Levels Level 1: Did Not Yet Meet Expectations (Min. 650) Level 2: Partially Met Expectations Level 3: Approached Expectations Level 4: Met Expectations Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (Max. 850)

Page 7 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ELA Performance Distribution Grade 03 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 744 44 White 753 55 African American 725 26 Hispanic 727 26 American Indian 738 40 Asian 769 70 Two or More Races 751 53 Students with Disability 718 24 English Language Learners 709 11 Economically Disadvantaged Students 724 24

Page 8 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ELA Performance Distribution Grade 04 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 47 731 751 15 28 30 26 2 28 52 White 758 63 African American 21 726 733 19 14 52 14 0 14 30 Hispanic 25 734 737 12 40 8 36 4 40 35 American Indian 746 52 Asian 773 78 Two or More Races 760 62 Students with Disability 725 25 English Language Learners 717 15 Economically Disadvantaged Students 43 729 734 16 30 28 23 2 26 31

Page 9 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ELA Performance Distribution Grade 05 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 751 53 White 757 62 African American 734 31 Hispanic 737 35 American Indian 746 45 Asian 771 77 Two or More Races 758 61 Students with Disability 723 21 English Language Learners 717 15 Economically Disadvantaged Students 734 31

Page 10 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ELA Performance Distribution Grade 06 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 77 747 749 4 14 32 45 4 49 50 White 755 59 African American 41 748 732 0 10 39 51 0 51 29 Hispanic 33 746 736 6 18 27 39 9 48 34 American Indian 743 39 Asian 770 77 Two or More Races 753 57 Students with Disability 718 17 English Language Learners 711 11 Economically Disadvantaged Students 63 745 733 5 14 33 43 5 48 30

Page 11 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ELA Performance Distribution Grade 07 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 54 753 750 6 15 19 48 13 61 53 White 757 61 African American 30 748 730 7 7 27 57 3 60 31 Hispanic 24 758 736 4 25 8 38 25 63 36 American Indian 746 49 Asian 777 80 Two or More Races 756 58 Students with Disability 713 18 English Language Learners 703 11 Economically Disadvantaged Students 46 754 733 7 11 20 50 13 63 33

Page 12 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ELA Performance Distribution Grade 08 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 73 762 750 5 5 23 47 19 66 53 White 757 61 African American 37 757 730 3 8 24 54 11 65 31 Hispanic 32 765 735 9 0 25 41 25 66 37 American Indian 741 49 Asian 778 80 Two or More Races 753 55 Students with Disability 713 16 English Language Learners 701 9 Economically Disadvantaged Students 57 764 732 5 5 23 44 23 67 34

Page 13 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ELA Performance Distribution Grade 09 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 48 743 739 8 13 44 31 4 35 41 White 746 47 African American 28 738 723 11 18 43 25 4 29 23 Hispanic 17 747 725 6 6 47 35 6 41 26 American Indian 732 33 Asian 765 68 Two or More Races 731 36 Students with Disability 706 9 English Language Learners 693 5 Economically Disadvantaged Students 37 744 724 11 11 41 32 5 38 24

Page 14 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ELA Performance Distribution Grade 10 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 46 749 735 11 15 24 33 17 50 38 White 741 43 African American 31 751 717 6 19 26 32 16 48 22 Hispanic 15 744 720 20 7 20 33 20 53 24 American Indian 725 27 Asian 763 62 Two or More Races 729 34 Students with Disability 698 8 English Language Learners 685 4 Economically Disadvantaged Students 32 744 718 13 13 31 31 13 44 23

Page 15 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ELA Performance Distribution Grade 11 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 47 750 741 2 15 32 43 9 51 42 White 745 46 African American 32 751 727 3 9 41 38 9 47 27 Hispanic 14 749 731 0 29 14 50 7 57 31 American Indian 745 38 Asian 765 64 Two or More Races 738 38 Students with Disability 712 16 English Language Learners 703 6 Economically Disadvantaged Students 33 751 730 0 18 36 36 9 45 30

Page 16 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC MATH Performance Distribution Grade 03 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 746 46 White 752 56 African American 728 25 Hispanic 733 28 American Indian 742 41 Asian 772 77 Two or More Races 751 54 Students with Disability 727 27 English Language Learners 724 17 Economically Disadvantaged Students 730 26

Page 17 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC MATH Performance Distribution Grade 04 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 47 736 744 4 26 40 30 0 30 42 White 749 50 African American 21 730 727 10 24 43 24 0 24 20 Hispanic 25 742 732 0 28 36 36 0 36 26 American Indian 740 40 Asian 769 75 Two or More Races 750 52 Students with Disability 724 21 English Language Learners 722 15 Economically Disadvantaged Students 43 735 730 5 26 44 26 0 26 23

Page 18 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC MATH Performance Distribution Grade 05 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 744 42 White 749 49 African American 728 21 Hispanic 733 26 American Indian 745 46 Asian 768 74 Two or More Races 749 50 Students with Disability 724 19 English Language Learners 724 17 Economically Disadvantaged Students 731 23

Page 19 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC MATH Performance Distribution Grade 06 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 77 737 743 9 18 38 34 1 35 42 White 749 50 African American 41 734 726 10 20 41 29 0 29 19 Hispanic 33 744 731 3 18 36 39 3 42 25 American Indian 740 35 Asian 768 75 Two or More Races 745 44 Students with Disability 718 15 English Language Learners 718 14 Economically Disadvantaged Students 63 738 729 8 19 38 33 2 35 23

Page 20 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC MATH Performance Distribution Grade 07 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 54 736 740 4 24 41 30 2 31 38 White 745 46 African American 30 729 725 7 33 37 23 0 23 17 Hispanic 24 745 730 0 13 46 38 4 42 23 American Indian 734 32 Asian 760 68 Two or More Races 742 43 Students with Disability 715 11 English Language Learners 717 11 Economically Disadvantaged Students 46 737 728 4 22 41 33 0 33 21

Page 21 of 42 201415 806017932 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC MATH Performance Distribution Grade 08 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 19 730 726 11 26 42 21 0 21 24 White 732 29 African American 715 14 Hispanic 721 19 American Indian 722 15 Asian 744 46 Two or More Races 724 24 Students with Disability 705 9 English Language Learners 706 10 Economically Disadvantaged Students 12 730 719 0 42 42 17 0 17 17

Page 22 of 42 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ALGEBRA I Performance Distribution 806017932 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 73 756 740 5 12 19 59 4 63 40 White 746 47 African American 43 746 722 7 19 23 51 0 51 20 Hispanic 27 769 725 4 4 15 70 7 78 21 American Indian 733 35 Asian 769 73 Two or More Races 734 35 Students with Disability 710 8 English Language Learners 710 7 Economically Disadvantaged Students 55 761 725 5 9 16 64 5 69 21

Page 23 of 42 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC GEOMETRY Performance Distribution 806017932 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 64 730 728 5 39 41 16 0 16 21 White 731 24 African American 716 7 Hispanic 23 736 718 0 35 39 26 0 26 8 American Indian 722 12 Asian 751 54 Two or More Races 724 20 Students with Disability 709 4 English Language Learners 710 6 Economically Disadvantaged Students 50 733 718 2 36 42 20 0 20 8

Page 24 of 42 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 PARCC ALGEBRA II Performance Distribution 806017932 This table presents the grade level outcomes, as measured by PARCC, in all five performance levels for all subgroups. PARCC consists of five performance levels: Level 1 Did not yet meet gradelevel expectations, Level 2 Partially met expectations, Level 3 Approached expectations, Level 4 Met expectations, and Level 5 Exceeded expectations. Subgroup Valid Scores Mean Scale Score State Mean Scale Score Level_1 Level_2 Level_3 Level_4 Level_5 Met/ State Exceeded Met/Exceeded Expectation Expectation wide 721 24 White 725 27 African American 701 8 Hispanic 706 10 American Indian 720 23 Asian 751 53 Two or More Races 716 21 Students with Disability 691 4 English Language Learners 694 6 Economically Disadvantaged Students 705 9

Page 25 of 42 NJASK Results Science Grade Level 04 This table presents the grade level proficiency results, as measured by NJASK, in Advanced Proficient, Proficient, and Partially Proficient categories for all appropriate subgroups. Advanced Partially Subgroups Proficient Proficient Proficient wide 26 68 6 White African American Hispanic American Indian Asian Two or More Races Students with Disability English Language Learners Economically Disadvantaged 26 67 7 Students Data is presented for subgroups when the count is high enough under ESEA Waiver suppression rules. 23 29 68 67 9 4 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 Proficiency Levels (in Percents) 100 80 60 40 20 0 806017932 NJASK Proficiency Trends Science Grade Level 04 This graph presents the grade level outcomes in the categories of Advanced Proficient, Proficient, and Partially Proficient over the last four years. Advanced Proficient Partially Proficient 26 68 6 201415 Proficient

Page 26 of 42 NJASK Results Science Grade Level 08 This table presents the grade level proficiency results, as measured by NJASK, in Advanced Proficient, Proficient, and Partially Proficient categories for all appropriate subgroups. Advanced Partially Subgroups Proficient Proficient Proficient wide 12 60 27 White African American Hispanic American Indian Asian Two or More Races Students with Disability English Language Learners Economically Disadvantaged 15 61 25 Students Data is presented for subgroups when the count is high enough under ESEA Waiver suppression rules. 11 15 53 67 36 18 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 Proficiency Levels (in Percents) 806017932 NJASK Proficiency Trends Science Grade Level 08 This graph presents the grade level outcomes in the categories of Advanced Proficient, Proficient, and Partially Proficient over the last four years. 100 80 60 40 20 0 27 57 16 16 58 26 14 65 21 12 60 27 201112 201213 201314 201415 Advanced Proficient Partially Proficient Proficient

Page 27 of 42 This graph presents the percentage of the enrolled students who were chronically absent for the past three years. Percent Students Chronically Absent () 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 5.2 Chronic Absenteeism Trend 7.9 5.8 201213 201314 201415 DATA_YEAR 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 Percent Absent 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 7 806017932 39 Absenteeism The chart below presents the percentage of students who were absent in each category of absence: 0 absences, 1 5 absences, 6 10 absences, 11 15 absences, and more than 15 absences. An absence is defined as being not present and includes the days missed regardless of whether they were determined to be excused or unexcused by the school. 30 13 11 Chronic Absenteeism for 201415 5.79 0 0 Absences 15 Absences 610 Absences 1115 Absences 15+ Absences Absences 0 Absences 15 Absences 610 Absences 1115 Absences 15+ Absences

Page 28 of 42 201415 806017932 COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS GRADE SPAN KG12 Students in high schools begin to demonstrate college readiness behaviors long before they actually graduate from high school. Among those behaviors are taking college entrance exams and challenging themselves with rigorous course work. The table below presents five such indicators: the percentage of students enrolled in the 12th grade who took the SAT or ACT, the percentage of 10th and 11th graders who took the PSAT, the percentage of students who scored above the SAT benchmark of 1550, the percentage of 11th and 12th graders who took at least one AP or IB test in English, math, social studies or science, and the percentage of those AP or IB tests that were scored a 3 or higher. The below chart consist of five columns with measures. The first column wide Performance represents the outcomes for these particular indicators in the school. The second column Peer Percentile indicates how the school's performance compares to its group of peer schools. The third column Statewide Percentile indicates how the school's performance compares to schools across the state. The fourth column Statewide Target provides the statewide targets for each of these indicators. The last column Met Target? indicates whether the Performance met or exceeded the statewide target. The Summary row presents the averages of the peer school percentiles, the average of statewide percentiles and the percentage of statewide targets met. College and Career Readiness Indicators wide Performance Peer Percentile Statewide Percentile Statewide Target Met Target? Percent of Students Participating in SAT or ACT Percent of Students Participating in PSAT or PLAN Percent of Students Scoring Above 1550 on SAT Percent of Students Taking at least one AP Test or IB Test in English, Math, Social Studies or Science Percent of AP Tests >= 3 or IB Test >= 4 in English, Math, Social Studies or Science Summary College Readiness Test Participation The first column of the table below presents the percentage of students enrolled in the 12th grade who took the SAT or ACT and the percentage of students enrolled in 10th and 11th grade who took the PSAT. The second column provides the average across the school's peer group for these two metrics. 201415 Percent of Students Participating in SAT Participating in ACT Participating in PSAT or PLAN Participating in Dual Enrollment 100.0 100.0 44.4 Peer Avg. 75.7 75.6 State Avg. 79.1 25.2 79.6 0.0 14.9 100 44 20 23 8 100 100 17 15 90 26 65 48 64 55 14 80 60 40 35 75 42 20 AP/IB Participation 'Unique' Students The table below presents the proportion of 'unique' students enrolled in at least 11th and 12th grade i.e, each student is counted once regardless of how many AP or IB courses he/she may take. The table also presents the proportion of how many 'unique' students took at least one AP or IB test to the school's enrollment in 11th and 12th grade. 201415 Percent of Students Taking One or More Course One or More Test 17.4 22.9 YES Peer Avg. 22.1 21.7 State Avg. 36.3 30.7 At least one AP or IB Test in English, Math, Social Studies or Science 22.9 19.1 25.3 Note: Students who are enrolled in AP/IB coursework or take AP/IB tests in grades other than 11th and 12th are included in the numerator of this calculation. NO NO NO NO

COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS Participation Rate 100 80 60 40 20 Participation Trends SAT Testing Participation Trends SAT Testing This graph presents the participation rate in the SAT over the last four years. 100 100 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 AP /IB Test Results This table presents the percentage of all AP/IB tests taken by students enrolled in the school that were scored AP >= 3 and scored IB >= 4. 201415 Peer Avg. State Avg. Percent of AP Tests >= 3 or IB Test >= 4 Percent of Scores in AP >= 3 or IB >= 4 in English, Math, Social Studies or Science 8.0 8.0 19.2 14.9 72.4 69.7 0 201314 201415 Year Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) Results This table presents the percentage of students who achieved a composite SAT score of 1550 or higher. The SAT benchmark score of 1550 (Critical Reading, Mathematics and Writing Score combined) indicates a 65 percent likelihood of achieving a B average or higher during the first year of college, which in turn has been found by the College Board's research to be indicative of a high likelihood of college success and completion. 201415 Percent of Students Scoring Above 1550 on SAT Peer Avg. Composite SAT Score State Avg. 19.6 9.3 43.8 This chart presents the average composite SAT score from the last academic year for students enrolled in this school as well as the average scores achieved in Critical Reading, Mathematics and Writing. The averages from this school s peer group are also presented. This chart presents the percentage of students who achieved a composite SAT score of 1550 or higher over the past four years. 100 above 1550 80 60 40 20 0 SAT Benchmark Trends 9.5 19.6 201314 201415 Year Composite SAT Score This chart presents the scores achieved in Critical Reading, Mathematics and Writing by the students at the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile and the 75th percentile of the school's distribution of SAT scores. 201415 Composite SAT Score Critical Reading Mathematics Writing 1,303 416 439 448 Peer Avg. 1,204 395 415 395 State Avg. 1,508 496 518 494 201415 75th Percentile 50th Percentile 25th Percentile Critical Reading 470 410 360 Mathematics 500 440 380 Writing 513 435 390 Page 29 of 42

Page 30 of 42 COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 AP/IB Courses Offered This table presents the count of students enrolled in each AP/IB course offered in this school in the first column. The second column presents the count of tests taken in each AP/IB course. The numbers may not match as some students do not take the test in the same year as they take the course and some students may take the course without taking the test or vice versa. AP/IB Course Name Students Enrolled Students Tested AP Calculus AB AP English Literature and Composition AP U.S. History 18 7 17 7 7

Page 31 of 42 COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 Visual and Performing Arts 806017932 The chart below contains the percentage of students who were enrolled in at least one Dance, Drama/Theater, Music or Visual Arts class in this school. The last row shows the percentage of students who were enrolled in any Visual and Performing Arts classes in the school. Percent of Students Enrolled State Dance N/R 2.1 Drama/Theater N/R 3.8 Music 65.3 17.8 Visual Arts N/R 31.7 Total: All Visual and Performing Arts N/R Data Not Reported 65.3 49.9.00 Participation in Career Readiness The chart below contains percentage of students who were participants in an approved Career and Technical Education Program in this school as well as across the. Percent of Students Enrolled State Participating in CTE N/R 18.3 Structured Learning Experience 0.0 7.0 N/R Data Not Reported

Page 32 of 42 201415 806017932 STUDENT GROWTH GRADE SPAN KG12 This section of the performance report presents data about student growth, utilizing the Student Growth Percentile Methodology (SGP). SGP creates a measure of how students progressed in grades 4 through 8 in Language Arts Literacy and in grades 4 through 7 in Math when compared to other students with a similar test score history. A short video explaining the methodology can be found here: http://www.state.nj.us/education/njsmart/performance/ The below chart consist of three columns with measures. The first column wide Performance presents the schoolwide median growth score in either English Language Arts/Literacy or Mathematics for all students in the school. The last column Met Target? indicates whether the school s performance met or exceeded the statewide target, which was set to 35. 00 Student Growth Indicators wide Performance Student Growth on Language Arts Student Growth on Math 74 61 Student Growth This table presents for all students with growth scores the interaction between their performance on PARCC and their growth scores. For example, in the top left cell the percentage of students who are both in Level 1 Did not yet meet expectations AND also demonstrating low growth is displayed. Language Arts Math (Expectations) Did Not Yet Meet Low 5 GROWTH Typical 2 High 0 (Expectations) Did Not Yet Meet Low 4 GROWTH Typical 1 High 0 Partially Met 4 6 5 Partially Met 8 11 4 Approached 4 8 16 Approached 5 12 19 Met Exceeded 2 9 31 Met 3 8 21 0 0 8 Exceeded 0 0 1 Low Growth is defined as an Student Growth Percentile score less than 35. Typical Growth is defined as an Student Growth Percentile score between 35 and 65. High Growth is defined as a Student Growth Percentile score higher than 65.

201415 806017932 GRADUATION AND POSTSECONDARY GRADE SPAN KG12 This section of the performance report presents data about graduation, dropout and postsecondary attendance. The graduation rate is calculated according to the ESEA Cohort methodology as required by the United States Department of Education. Dropout rates are calculated from studentlevel data submitted by districts for students officially classified as dropouts. The dropout rate is the count of students who dropout in an academic year divided by the school's total enrollment. The below chart consist of five columns with measures. The first column wide Performance represents the outcomes for these particular indicators in this school. The second column Peer Percentile indicates how the school s performance compares to its group of peer schools. The third column Statewide Percentile indicates how the school s performance compares to schools across the state.. The fourth column Statewide Target provides the statewide targets for each of these indicators. The Statewide Target for Graduation Rate was established pursuant to NJDOE s ESEA Accountability Workbook. The last column Met Target indicates whether the Performance met or exceeded the statewide target. The Summary row presents the averages of the peer school percentile, the average of statewide percentile and the percentage of statewide targets met. Graduation & Post Secondary Indicators wide Performance Peer Percentile Statewide Percentile Statewide Targets Met Target Overall Graduation Rate 85 65 20 78 YES Dropout Rate SUMMARY Graduation & PostSecondary Graduation Rate by Subgroup This table presents for all NCLBidentified subgroups the 4year Adjusted Graduation Rate. This rate calculates the percentage of students who are awarded a regular, high school diploma within four years of becoming a firsttime ninth grader. The rate is adjusted to account for students who transferin and for students who are verified as transfersout'. wide White African American Hispanic American Indian Asian Native Hawaiian Two or More Races Students with Disability English Language Learners Economically Disadvantaged Students 84 86 State Target 85 78 0 100 83 100 2 YES 60 100 Dropout Rate by Subgroup This table presents for all NCLBidentified subgroups the Dropout rate. This rate calculates the percentage of students who are classified as dropouts divided by the school's total enrollment and by each subgroup enrollment. White 0 0 0 0 State Target wide 0 2 African American Hispanic American Indian Asian Native Hawaiian Two or More Races Students with Disability English Language Learners Economically Disadvantaged Students Page 33 of 42

Page 34 of 42 GRADUATION AND POSTSECONDARY 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 Graduation Pathway Rates Extended Year Graduation Rate This chart presents the percentage of high school graduates who graduated by passing both sections of the HSPA, who were exempt from passing the HSPA, or who demonstrated proficiency through an alternative pathway such as through the Alternative High Assessment, achievement of the Just Proficient Mean or an appeal process. The chart below presents the 4year and 5year graduation rate for the prior school year s cohort in addition to the 4year graduation rate for last year s cohort. Class of 4year Rate 5year Rate EXEMPT 8.5 OTHER 2.1 2012 2013 2014 89 0 95 2015 85 HSPA 89.4 HSPA OTHER EXEMPT

Page 35 of 42 GRADUATION AND POSTSECONDARY 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 This chart presents the enrollment rates of this school s high school graduates, 16months after high school graduation. The data is from the National Student Clearinghouse which reports that it collects studentlevel enrollment data from 95 of Institutions of Higher Education nationwide. The last columns indicate, for the schoolwide total and each subgroup, the percentage of postsecondary enrollees that were enrolled in either a 2 year or a 4 year institution. Statewide Postsecondary Enrollment Rates Percent Enrolled Percent in 2 Year Percent in 4 Year 78.5 34.3 64.7 00 wide White African American Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian Two or More Races Students with Disability English Language Learners Economically Disadvantaged Students

Page 36 of 42 WITHIN SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT GAP 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 This section of the performance report presents data about the achievement gap that exists within a school as measured by the difference between the students scale scores at the 25th and 75th percentile in the school, the Interquartile Range (IQR). Taken together with an understanding of the overall and average achievement levels in the school, the IQR furthers an understanding of the range of student outcomes that exist in a school. A school gap smaller than the state gap indicates that the school s range of student outcomes is narrower than the state s while a school gap broader than the state gap indicates that the school s range of student outcomes is larger than the state s. Grade Level 04 Grade Level 04 PARCC Language Arts 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. 800 850 99th 786 752 732 715 663 773 750 728 650 PARCC MATH 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score 99th 75th 50th 25th 0th 25th vs 75th Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap State 37 45 25th vs 75th Gap 33 43 75th 50th 25th 0th 753 735 720 668 850 764 742 721 650 Scale Score Gap State

Page 37 of 42 201415 806017932 WITHIN SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT GAP GRADE SPAN KG12 Grade Level 06 Grade Level 06 PARCC Language Arts 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. 800 850 99th 785 763 747 730 693 770 749 726 650 PARCC MATH 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score 99th 75th 50th 25th 0th 25th vs 75th Gap Grade Level 07 Grade Level PARCC Language Arts 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. 99th 75th 50th 25th 0th 827 850 99th 788 771 754 734 673 Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap State 33 44 25th vs 75th Gap 37 42 776 751 724 650 75th 50th 25th 0th 755 739 718 685 850 763 742 721 650 PARCC MATH 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. 751 735 722 670 Scale Score Gap State Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score 25th vs 75th Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap State 37 52 25th vs 75th Gap 29 39 75th 50th 25th 0th 07 850 759 740 720 650 Scale Score Gap State

Page 38 of 42 201415 806017932 WITHIN SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT GAP GRADE SPAN KG12 Grade Level 08 Grade Level 08 PARCC Language Arts 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. 823 850 99th 771 779 758 735 674 Grade Level 09 777 751 723 650 PARCC English Language Arts/Literacy 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. 823 850 99th 812 762 740 726 676 PARCC MATH 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score 99th 75th 50th 25th 0th 25th vs 75th Gap 99th 75th 50th 25th 0th Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap State 44 54 25th vs 75th Gap 29 44 766 739 710 650 75th 50th 25th 0th 746 732 717 689 850 748 726 704 650 PARCC ALG1 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. 777 754 725 677 Scale Score Gap State Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score 25th vs 75th Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap State 36 56 25th vs 75th Gap 52 51 75th 50th 25th 0th 821 762 735 711 650 Scale Score Gap State

Page 39 of 42 WITHIN SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT GAP Grade Level 10 PARCC English Language Arts/Literacy 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 PARCC GEO 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score 99th 75th 50th 25th 0th 25th vs 75th Gap 818 850 99th 773 772 747 723 650 Grade Level 11 766 733 699 650 PARCC English Language Arts/Literacy 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. 99th 75th 50th 25th 0th 812 850 99th N/A 767 750 736 686 Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap State 49 67 25th vs 75th Gap 26 37 768 740 711 650 75th 50th 25th 0th 740 724 714 686 793 747 726 710 650 PARCC ALG2 25th ile vs 75thile This table presents the scale scores associated with students at the bottom (0th percentile), the 25th percentile, the 50th percentile, the 75th percentile and the top (99th percentile) of school's distribution. N/A N/A N/A N/A Scale Score Gap State Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score Percentile Scale Score State Scale Score 25th vs 75th Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap Scale Score Gap State 31 57 25th vs 75th Gap N/A 56 75th 50th 25th 0th 813 748 718 692 650 Scale Score Gap State

Page 40 of 42 SCHOOL CLIMATE 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 Length of Day This table presents the amount of time a school is in session for a typical student on a normal school day. Instructional Time This table presents the amount of time that a typical student is engaged in instructional activities under the supervision of a certified teacher. 00 201415 201415 8 Hrs. 18 Mins. Full Time 6 Hrs. 54 Mins. Shared Time 0 Hrs. 0 Mins. Student Suspension Rate This table presents the percentage of students who were suspended one or more times during the school year. 201415 15.7 Student Expulsions This table presents the number of students who were expelled from the school and district during the school year. 201415 0 Student to Staff Ratio This table presents the count of students per faculty member or administrator in the school. All staff are counted in fulltime equivalents. 201415 Faculty Administrators 13 315

Page 41 of 42 SCHOOL PEER GROUP 201415 GRADE SPAN KG12 806017932 This table presents the list of peer schools in alphabetical order by county name that was created specifically for this school (highlighted in yellow). Peer schools are drawn from across the state and represent schools that have similar grade configurations and that are educating students of similar demographic characteristics, as measured by enrollment in Free/Reduced Lunch Programs, Limited English Proficiency or Special Education Programs. COUNTY NAME DISTRICT NAME SCHOOL NAME GRADESPAN ECONOMICALLY ENGLISH SPECIAL CDS CODE DISADVANTAGED LANGUAGE EDUCATION LEARNER ATLANTIC ATLANTIC CITY ATLANTIC CITY HIGH SCHOOL 010110010 0912 77.9 7.2 16.5 CAMDEN CAMDEN CITY WOODROW WILSON HIGH SCHOOL 070680040 0912 85.8 20.5 26.3 CAPE MAY WILDWOOD CITY WILDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL 095790050 0912 76.2 5.9 31 FOUNDATION ACADEMY CHARTER 806017932 KG12 81.6 2.8 9.8 SCHOOL MARION P. THOMAS CS MARION P. THOMAS CHARTER 807210940 PK12 78.9 0 13.8 SCHOOL NORTH STAR ACAD. CS OF NORTH STAR ACADEMY CHARTER 807320960 KG12 83.9 0 8.8 NEWARK SCHOOLS OF NEWARK PATERSON CS FOR SCI/TECH PATERSON CHARTER SCHOOL FOR 807503970 KG12 79.5 1.9 9.5 SCIENCE/TECHNOLOGY CUMBERLAND BRIDGETON CITY BRIDGETON HIGH SCHOOL 110540020 0912 86 8 12.4 ESSEX EAST ORANGE CICELY L. TYSON COMMUNITY 131210150 0612 73 0.3 14 MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL ESSEX EAST ORANGE EAST ORANGE STEM ACADEMY 131210030 0612 77.4 0.9 2.6 HIGH SCHOOL ESSEX NEWARK CITY CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL 133570030 0912 83.2 8.6 27.3 ESSEX NEWARK CITY MALCOLM X SHABAZZ HIGH 133570050 0912 78.4 0.2 25.2 SCHOOL ESSEX NEWARK CITY UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL 133570057 0712 77.7 0.5 8.6 HUDSON HARRISON TOWN HARRISON HIGH SCHOOL 172060050 0912 86 6.6 13.2 HUDSON HOBOKEN CITY HOBOKEN JUNIOR SENIOR HIGH 172210005 0712 83.1 0.9 11.8 SCHOOL HUDSON JERSEY CITY HENRY SNYDER HIGH SCHOOL 172390050 0912 77.8 0.4 30.3 HUDSON JERSEY CITY LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL 172390070 0912 77.4 0.5 23.6 MIDDLESEX NEW BRUNSWICK CITY NEW BRUNSWICK HIGH SCHOOL 233530050 PK12 86.3 12 14.5 MONMOUTH KEANSBURG BORO KEANSBURG HIGH SCHOOL 252400010 0912 74.1 1.1 18.4 OCEAN LAKEWOOD TWP LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL 292520050 0912 85.8 7.3 13.2 PASSAIC PASSAIC CO MANCHESTER PASSAIC COUNTYMANCHESTER 313980010 0912 78.5 3 15.4 REG REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL