West Virginia. at a glance. A quick look at West Virginia s financial information for the citizens.

Similar documents
Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

46 Children s Defense Fund

San Francisco County Weekly Wages

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Shelters Elementary School

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Educational Attainment

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Rural Education in Oregon

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Financing Education In Minnesota

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Kahului Elementary School

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Estimating the Cost of Meeting Student Performance Standards in the St. Louis Public Schools

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

DIRECT CERTIFICATION AND THE COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION (CEP) HOW DO THEY WORK?

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Organization Profile

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

2/3 9.8% 38% $0.78. The Status of Women in Missouri: 2016 ARE WOMEN 51% 22% A Comprehensive Report of Leading Indicators and Findings.

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Trends in College Pricing

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

Transportation Equity Analysis

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

12-month Enrollment

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Data Diskette & CD ROM

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

Communities in Schools of Virginia

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

The Value of English Proficiency to the. By Amber Schwartz and Don Soifer December 2012

Chapter Six The Non-Monetary Benefits of Higher Education

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application


Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Texas Healthcare & Bioscience Institute

State Budget Update February 2016

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

The Racial Wealth Gap

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

Hokulani Elementary School

Transcription:

at a glance A quick look at s financial information for the citizens www.wvcheckbook.gov Inside you will find information on: WV Economic Snapshot...pages 2-6 WV Economy at a Glance State versus National Unemployment Rates Education Statistics Natural Resources Public Health Public Safety Transportation For more information please visit us at www.wvsao.gov

S N A P S H O T February 2018 WEST VIRGINIA February Summary Economic conditions in were somewhat improved in recent months as payroll employment rose and housing market indicators were mostly positive; however, the unemployment rate rose slightly. Labor Markets: Employers in added 400 jobs (0.1 percent), on net, to payrolls in December. The professional and business services industry added the most jobs in the month (800 jobs), followed by construction (600 jobs), and mining and logging (400 jobs). Conversely, the largest declines were reported in trade, transportation, and utilities (800 jobs) and government (400 jobs). Since December 2016, total payroll employment in grew 0.2 percent, which was the slowest growth rate in the Fifth District. The construction industry reported the largest year-over-year growth rate of 8.5 percent (2,600 jobs) while the educational and health services industry added the most jobs (3,000 jobs). On the downside, the largest job loss was reported in trade, transportation, and utilities, which cut 4,000 jobs since last December. Household Conditions: The unemployment rate in increased 0.2 percentage point to 5.5 percent in December. The number of unemployed increased 3.9 percent in the month while the labor force edged up 0.4 percent. The labor force participation rate edged up to 53.4 percent in December. In the third quarter of 2017, the share of mortgages in West Virginia with payments 90 or more days past due ticked up 0.1 percentage point to 1.5 percent. Delinquency rates for fixed and adjustable rate conventional loans also increased in the third quarter to 1.3 percent and 2.7 percent, respectively. Also in the third quarter, real personal income in rose 0.2 percent and increased 0.1 percent since the third quarter of 2016. Housing Markets: issued 197 new residential permits in December, up from 160 permits in November and up from 151 permits issued in December 2016. Among the state s metro areas, permitting activity picked up in the Charleston and Huntington MSAs in the month and on a year-over-year basis. Housing starts in totaled 2,700 in December, a 17.6 percent increase from the prior month and a 41.2 percent increase from December 2016. According to CoreLogic Information Solutions, home values in depreciated 0.2 percent in November but appreciated 3.5 percent on a year-over-year basis. At the metro-level, house prices only rose in Parkersburg in the month and in Charlestown and Morgantown on a year-over-year basis. A MONTHLY UPDATE OF THE FIFTH DISTRICT ECONOMY FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND A Closer Look at Unemployment Insurance Claims Initial Claims (December 2017): 6,396 claims Year-over-year Percent Change (December 2017): -14.1 percent Characteristics of the Insured Unemployed (December 2017) Sex: Male (68.8%), Female (31.2%), Not Reported (0.0%) Race: White (86.8%), Black (4.2%), Asian (0.3%), Native Alaskan or American (0.3%), Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (0.1%), Not Reported (8.2%) Hispanic or Latino: Hispanic or Latino (1.5%), Not Hispanic or Latino (86.2%), Not Reported (12.3%) 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0-20 -40 Initial Unemployment Claims Year-Over-Year Percent Change -60 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

S N A P S H O T February 2018 WEST VIRGINIA FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND Labor Market Conditions Payroll Employment (SA) Period Level (000s) MoM % Change YoY % Change Year-over-Year Percent Change in December 2017 - Total December 147,380.0 0.10 1.41 Fifth District - Total December 14,847.3-0.03 1.31 - Total December 748.1 0.05 0.17 Logging and Mining December 21.3 1.91 4.93 Construction December 33.1 1.85 8.52 Manufacturing December 46.0 0.00-0.86 Trade, Transportation, and Utilities December 128.2-0.62-3.03 Information (NSA) December 9.4-1.05-6.00 Financial Activities December 27.5 0.36 1.10 Payroll Employment Performance Professional and Business Services December 64.6 1.25 0.00 Other Services -0.6 Education and Health Services December 134.2-0.22 2.29 Government -0.8 Leisure and Hospitality December 75.6-0.13 1.34-8 -6-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 Other Services December 53.8 0.37-0.55 Total Employment Performance Government December 154.5-0.26-0.83 Year-over-Year Percent Change in December 2017 Metro Payroll Employment (NSA) Period Level (000s) YoY % Change Beckley MSA - Total December 44.1-1.56 Charleston MSA - Total December 120.3 0.92 Huntington MSA - Total December 139.8 0.22 Morgantown MSA - Total December 72.8 1.11 Parkersburg MSA - Total December 40.2-2.19 A MONTHLY UPDATE OF THE FIFTH DISTRICT ECONOMY - Total Logging and Mining Construction Manufacturing Trade, Transportation, and Utilities Information (NSA) Financial Activities Professional and Business Services Education and Health Services (SA) Fifth District (SA) (SA) Beckley MSA Charleston MSA Leisure and Hospitality -1.6-6.0-3.0-0.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.1 1.3 2.3 0.9 4.9 1.3 1.4 8.5 Huntington MSA 0.2 Morgantown MSA 1.1 Parkersburg MSA -2.2-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

S N A P S H O T February 2018 WEST VIRGINIA FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND Labor Market Conditions Unemployment Rate (SA) December 17 November 17 December 16 Through December 2017 4.1 4.1 4.7 Fifth District 4.2 4.1 4.6 5.5 5.3 5.8 Beckley MSA 6.3 6.2 6.3 Charleston MSA 5.8 5.5 5.3 Huntington MSA 5.7 5.6 5.8 Morgantown MSA 4.4 4.2 4.2 Parkersburg MSA 6.2 5.8 5.5 Civilian Labor Force (SA) Period Level (000s) MoM % Change YoY % Change December 160,597 0.04 0.54 Fifth District December 15,997-0.21 0.95 December 783 0.39 0.06 Unemployment Rate Beckley MSA December 44 0.45-1.55 Labor Force Charleston MSA December 97 0.73 1.14 Year-over-Year Percent Change through December 2017 Huntington MSA December 147 0.55 1.10 Morgantown MSA December 68 0.45 1.81 Parkersburg MSA December 38 1.05-1.03 A MONTHLY UPDATE OF THE FIFTH DISTRICT ECONOMY 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 3 2 Initial Unemployment Claims (NSA) Period Level MoM % Change YoY % Change December 1,309,894 17.36-7.06 Fifth District December 73,072 30.08-14.03 December 6,396 12.23-14.14 1 0-1 -2 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

S N A P S H O T February 2018 WEST VIRGINIA A MONTHLY UPDATE OF THE FIFTH DISTRICT ECONOMY FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND Household Conditions Real Personal Income Real Personal Income (SA) Period Level ($mil) QoQ % Change YoY % Change Year-over-Year Percent Change through Q3:17 6 Q3:17 14,581,663 0.29 1.12 Fifth District Q3:17 1,413,529 0.28 1.48 4 Q3:17 60,713 0.20 0.11 Non-Business Bankruptcies Period Level QoQ % Change YoY % Change Q4:17 176,728-6.76-0.91 Fifth District Q4:17 6,018-60.95-59.01 Q4:17 0 0.00 0.00 2 0-2 Mortgage Delinquencies (% 90+ Days Delinquent) Q3:17 Q2:17 Q3:16 All Mortgages 1.29 1.20 1.41 Conventional - Fixed Rate 0.98 0.92 1.05 Conventional - Adjustable Rate 2.17 2.12 2.57 Mortgage Delinquencies Percent 90+ Days Delinquent through Q3:17 All Mortgages 1.52 1.43 1.54 Conventional - Fixed Rate 1.27 1.19 1.23 Conventional - Adjustable Rate 2.70 2.34 3.00-4 -6 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

S N A P S H O T February 2018 WEST VIRGINIA Real Estate Conditions FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND New Housing Units Permits: New Private Housing Units (NSA) Period Level MoM % Change YoY % Change Year-over-Year Percent Change through December 2017 December 93,054-4.03 1.80 Fifth District December 10,056-25.17 3.14 December 197 23.13 30.46 Charleston MSA December 10 27.78 27.78 Huntington MSA December 22 100.00 120.00 Morgantown MSA December 0-100.00-100.00 Parkersburg MSA December 2-60.00-60.00 A MONTHLY UPDATE OF THE FIFTH DISTRICT ECONOMY 200 150 100 50 0 Total Private Housing Starts (SAAR) Period Level (000s) MoM % Change YoY % Change December 1,192-8.24-5.99 Fifth District December 140-28.35 11.83 December 2.7 17.60 41.24-50 -100-150 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 House Price Index (2000=100) Period Level MoM % Change YoY % Change House Price Index (CoreLogic) November 196 0.96 6.97 15 Year-over-Year Percent Change through November 2017 Fifth District November 196 0.28 4.10 10 November 164-0.22 3.46 Charleston MSA November 141-0.22 0.27 5 Huntington MSA November 149-0.22-1.71 Morgantown MSA November 187-0.22 7.27 0 Parkersburg MSA November 142 1.77-4.04-5 Median Home Sales Price - NAR (NSA) Period Level ($000s) QoQ % Change YoY % Change Charleston MSA Q3:17 138-0.14-2.61-10 -15-20 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Unemployment Rates versus National Unemployment Rates Data from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Last updated: Jan 24, 2018 http://lmi.workforcewv.org/datarelease/countydatarelease.pdf

HIGH SCHOOLS High School Graduation Gains Equal Economic Success If increased its overall graduation rate to 90 percent, the economic benefits from these 4,300 additional graduates would likely include as much as $42 million in increased annual earnings and $2.5 million in annual state and local tax revenues; 300 new jobs and a $52 million increase in the gross state product; and $63 million in increased home sales and $4.4 million in increased auto sales. 1 Progress Has Been Made, But Graduation Gaps Remain Despite Gains, Not All Students Are Graduating from High School at the Same Rates High School Graduation Rates by Race (Class of 2011) 2 All American White Black Hispanic Asian Students Indian WV 76% 77% 72% 71% 91% Nation (Avg.) 79% 85% 67% 71% 87% 64% Insufficient or no data and Even Fewer Are Graduating from College Four-Year College Graduation Rates 3 All White Black Hispanic Asian Students American Indian * 46% 48% 27% 36% 46% 38% Nation* 56% 60% 38% 48% 68% 39% Due to data limitations for two-year institutions, particularly as they relate to students who transfer from their first institution, two-year college graduation rates have been omitted. *Graduation within six years of entrance (Cohort from 2005 to 2011) Better Preparation Is Key for Success in College and a Career Literacy Is an Underlying Problem for Many Students School Year (SY) 2010 11 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Reading Scores for Eighth Graders 4 Nation 25% 43% 29% 3% WV White Black Low-Income 32% 44% 23% 1% 31% 44% 23% 1% 43% 37% 18% 1% 42% 42% 15% 1% Below Basic Basic Proficient (at grade level) Advanced Insufficient or no data was reported for other subgroups... and They Also Struggle in Other Subject Areas Percentage of ACT-Tested Graduates Ready for College-Level Course Work in 2012 5 English Math Reading Science All Four Subjects WV 70% 33% 53% 25% 19% Nation 67% 46% 52% 31% 25% Commitment Is Paying Off, But Struggling Schools Remain About 10% of all high schools still produce 40%+ of the nation s dropouts. In these dropout factories, 60% or fewer of freshmen are promoted to senior year on time. Nationally, students of color and Native students are nearly four times more likely than their white peers to be enrolled in a dropout factory. 6 Improving these schools must remain a national priority. High Schools Federally Reported High Schools 7 105 (SY 2009-10) Dropout Factories 8 2 (3 yr avg. 2008-10) 109 (SY 2010-11) 4 (Class of 2011) An additional 15 high schools in had a promoting power between 60 and 70 percent in SY 2010 11. 9 Nationally, the number of dropout factories decreased 12% (from 1,617 to 1,424). 10 The number of all high schools decreased less than 1% from SY 2009 10 to SY 2010 11. 11 States Are Strengthening Standards to Improve Preparedness, along with 45 states and the District of Columbia, has adopted a common, state-created set of world-class standards for college and career readiness in English language arts and math. The four remaining states have their own college- and career-ready standards. More Accurate Measures of Student Proficiency Are Needed s Eighth-Grade Proficiency as Measured by State Test vs. the Nation s Report Card (NAEP) for SY 2011 12 12 State Test NAEP 48% Reading 24% Nationwide, the average gaps between state- and NAEP-reported reading and math scores are 40 percentage points and 32 percentage points, respectively. States Are Working to Create New and Better Assessments Forty-two states participate in one of two consortia to develop Common Core State Standards aligned next-generation assessments, which are scheduled to be administered during SY 2014 15. participates in the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Excellent Teacher Training Is Critical to Increased Student Achievement To promote higher levels of student achievement, 27 states have committed to educating and preparing better teachers and administrators through teacher licensing, program accreditation, and effective data use policies. has not joined this coalition of states focusing on educator preparation and entry into the profession. 13 Connecting Technology to Schools and Students Having access to a broadband network connectivity is crucial to taking advantage of the world of technology and what it offers in the classroom. West Virginia does have a statewide broadband network for its schools. 14 The use of technology lends flexibility to schools and classrooms. does allow additional flexibility by permitting schools to use funding for instructional materials on digital resources. 15 The Next Frontier: Deepen and Personalize Learning Today s modern economy requires more than basic content knowledge. Leading states are building an engaging and personalized education process to achieve deeper learning outcomes of core content knowledge, creative and critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. To foster such learning, school districts like Colorado s Adams County School District 50, and even entire states, like New Hampshire and Oregon, permit students to advance their grade level based on mastery of content rather than on amount of time spent in the classroom. 1) Alliance, The Crisis and Economic Potential in America s Education System, 2011; 2) U.S. Dept. of Education, Four-Year Cohort Graduation Rates ; 3) National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, 2012; 4) NCES, Nation s Report Card: Reading 2011; 5) ACT, The Condition of College and Career Readiness: 2012; 6) Analysis of data from Everyone Graduates Center and NCES Common Core of Data; 7) NCES, Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe, 2005 2011, 2012; 8) Unpublished data from Everyone Graduates Center at Johns Hopkins University, 2013; 9) Ibid.; 10) Ibid.; 11) NCES, Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe, 2005 2011, 2012; 12) NCES, Nation s Report Card: Reading 2011; NCES, Nation s Report Card: Math 2011; Department of Education, 2013; 13) Council of Chief State School Officers, Our Responsibility, Our Promise, 2012; 14) State Educational Technology Directors Association State Education Policy Center, 2012; 15) Digital Learning Now!, 2012 Digital Learning Report Card, 2012 42% Math 21% www.all4ed.org Follow the Alliance at twitter.com/all4ed and share these stats using #all4ed. September 2013, Alliance for Excellent Education

Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service January 2018 PROFILE OF SNAP HOUSEHOLDS Congressional District 1 The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the cornerstone of the Nation s nutrition assistance safety net. Benefits are available to most people who meet the financial and nonfinancial requirements, and the program serves a broad spectrum of low income people. In Fiscal Year 2016, SNAP provided about $.50 billion dollars in food benefits to a monthly average of 357,531 people in. The program served 85.4 percent of those eligible for benefits in in 2015. SNAP also has an economic multiplier effect; every dollar in new SNAP benefits results in $1.80 in total economic activity. The American Community Survey provides a snapshot of SNAP participants in 2016 for each Congressional District. More detailed information for the Nation and each State is presented in Characteristics of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Households: Fiscal Year 2016, available at http://www.fns.usda.gov/ops/research-and-analysis. Congressional District 1 Characteristic Households Households not Receiving SNAP Receiving SNAP Total Total Households 36,169 203,872 240,041 With one or more people 60 years and over 32.0% 45.1% 43.1% With child(ren) under 18 years 42.6% 22.8% 25.8% With disabled individual(s) 56.3% 28.3% 32.5% Income and Poverty Status in the past 12 Months 1 Below poverty level 54.6% 9.5% 16.3% Median income (2016 dollars) $18,059 $52,399 $45,611 Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin of Householder White 92.8% 96.2% 95.7% Black or African American 4.2% 1.7% 2.0% American Indian and Alaska Native N/A N/A N/A Asian N/A N/A N/A Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A Some other race N/A N/A N/A Two or more races 2.6%.8% 1.1% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 1.6%.8%.9% Work Status Families 21,933 128,097 150,030 No workers in the past 12 months 27.5% 20.8% 21.8% 1 worker in the past 12 months 50.2% 31.8% 34.5% 2 or more workers in the past 12 months 22.2% 47.4% 43.7% Source: USDA FNS SNAP Program Data (downloaded October 2017), Reaching Those in Need: Estimates of State SNAP Participation Rates (forthcoming); U.S. Census Bureau 2016 American Community Survey (ACS), using 115 th Congressional District boundaries. 1 The ACS bases poverty status on annual household income; SNAP eligibility is based on monthly income. Due to this difference in reference periods, poverty status in the ACS may differ from poverty status at the time of SNAP certification. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service January 2018 PROFILE OF SNAP HOUSEHOLDS Congressional District 2 The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the cornerstone of the Nation s nutrition assistance safety net. Benefits are available to most people who meet the financial and nonfinancial requirements, and the program serves a broad spectrum of low income people. In Fiscal Year 2016, SNAP provided about $.50 billion dollars in food benefits to a monthly average of 357,531 people in. The program served 85.4 percent of those eligible for benefits in in 2015. SNAP also has an economic multiplier effect; every dollar in new SNAP benefits results in $1.80 in total economic activity. The American Community Survey provides a snapshot of SNAP participants in 2016 for each Congressional District. More detailed information for the Nation and each State is presented in Characteristics of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Households: Fiscal Year 2016, available at http://www.fns.usda.gov/ops/research-and-analysis. Congressional District 2 Characteristic Households Households not Receiving SNAP Receiving SNAP Total Total Households 37,169 207,995 245,164 With one or more people 60 years and over 32.2% 45.1% 43.1% With child(ren) under 18 years 43.6% 26.3% 28.9% With disabled individual(s) 50.4% 30.1% 33.2% Income and Poverty Status in the past 12 Months 1 Below poverty level 53.5% 8.3% 15.2% Median income (2016 dollars) $17,297 $55,254 $48,358 Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin of Householder White 89.5% 93.5% 92.9% Black or African American 7.5% 4.2% 4.7% American Indian and Alaska Native 1.6%.1%.3% Asian.2% 1.0%.8% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A Some other race.5%.3%.3% Two or more races.7%.9%.9% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 1.2% 1.0% 1.0% Work Status Families 23,552 137,005 160,557 No workers in the past 12 months 33.4% 19.3% 21.4% 1 worker in the past 12 months 42.7% 31.9% 33.5% 2 or more workers in the past 12 months 23.9% 48.7% 45.1% Source: USDA FNS SNAP Program Data (downloaded October 2017), Reaching Those in Need: Estimates of State SNAP Participation Rates (forthcoming); U.S. Census Bureau 2016 American Community Survey (ACS), using 115 th Congressional District boundaries. 1 The ACS bases poverty status on annual household income; SNAP eligibility is based on monthly income. Due to this difference in reference periods, poverty status in the ACS may differ from poverty status at the time of SNAP certification. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service January 2018 PROFILE OF SNAP HOUSEHOLDS Congressional District 3 The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the cornerstone of the Nation s nutrition assistance safety net. Benefits are available to most people who meet the financial and nonfinancial requirements, and the program serves a broad spectrum of low income people. In Fiscal Year 2016, SNAP provided about $.50 billion dollars in food benefits to a monthly average of 357,531 people in. The program served 85.4 percent of those eligible for benefits in in 2015. SNAP also has an economic multiplier effect; every dollar in new SNAP benefits results in $1.80 in total economic activity. The American Community Survey provides a snapshot of SNAP participants in 2016 for each Congressional District. More detailed information for the Nation and each State is presented in Characteristics of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Households: Fiscal Year 2016, available at http://www.fns.usda.gov/ops/research-and-analysis. Congressional District 3 Characteristic Households Households not Receiving SNAP Receiving SNAP Total Total Households 55,650 181,270 236,920 With one or more people 60 years and over 30.2% 51.2% 46.3% With child(ren) under 18 years 43.0% 23.8% 28.3% With disabled individual(s) 58.8% 38.9% 43.6% Income and Poverty Status in the past 12 Months 1 Below poverty level 57.3% 10.2% 21.3% Median income (2016 dollars) $14,893 $46,110 $37,728 Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin of Householder White 93.9% 94.9% 94.7% Black or African American 3.9% 3.3% 3.4% American Indian and Alaska Native N/A N/A N/A Asian.1%.6%.5% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A Some other race.7%.3%.4% Two or more races 1.3%.8%.9% Hispanic or Latino (of any race).5%.6%.5% Work Status Families 37,002 119,807 156,809 No workers in the past 12 months 38.2% 23.6% 27.1% 1 worker in the past 12 months 44.5% 35.1% 37.3% 2 or more workers in the past 12 months 17.3% 41.3% 35.6% Source: USDA FNS SNAP Program Data (downloaded October 2017), Reaching Those in Need: Estimates of State SNAP Participation Rates (forthcoming); U.S. Census Bureau 2016 American Community Survey (ACS), using 115 th Congressional District boundaries. 1 The ACS bases poverty status on annual household income; SNAP eligibility is based on monthly income. Due to this difference in reference periods, poverty status in the ACS may differ from poverty status at the time of SNAP certification. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Thank you for visiting at a glance. We will update this document as data becomes available to us. If you have question or concerns, please contact the State Auditor s Office 304.558.2251 or toll free 1.877.982.9148. www.wvsao.gov