Key Actions: (List as many actions as needed in each box.)

Similar documents
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Comprehensive Progress Report

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

World s Best Workforce Plan

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

Gifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

NC Global-Ready Schools

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Robert Bennis Elementary School

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

1110 Main Street, East Hartford, CT Tel: (860) Fax: (860)

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Cooper Upper Elementary School

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Brandon Alternative School

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

State Parental Involvement Plan

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cuero Independent School District

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Jefferson County School District Testing Plan

School Leadership Rubrics

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

KDE Comprehensive School. Improvement Plan. Harlan High School

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

School Action Plan: Template Overview

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

BEST PRACTICES FOR PRINCIPAL SELECTION

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Hitchcock Independent School District. District Improvement Plan

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

Hokulani Elementary School

Oakland Terrace School For The Visual And Performing Arts

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

4 Subgroup scores. 1 Index scores and Trend SPS indictors

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

ESE SUPPORT & PROCEDURES ESE FTE PREPARATION ESE FUNDING & ALLOCATIONS

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Regions Of Georgia For 2nd Grade

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Reynolds School District Literacy Framework

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Geographic Area - Englewood

Georgia Department of Education

WORKSHOP NOTES Christine Torre

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

Evaluation of Teach For America:

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

CURRENT POSITION: Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

Port Jervis City School District Academic Intervention Services (AIS) Plan

Saskatchewan Ministry of Education

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Marvelous Motivational Math Centers

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

Transcription:

Strategic Plan Level ableton Elementary School: 2016-2017 Cobb County School District Strategic Plan Long Range Board Goal 1: Vary learning experiences to increase success in college and career pathways. District Focus Areas and Priorities 2016-2019 2016-17 Aligned Actions and easurements (Due June 30, 2017) Focus Focus Area: Vary learning experiences to increase success in college and career pathways. Focus Priorities: (Based on priorities identified by IE 2, AdvancEd-AdvEd, Superintendent-S, and Academic Division-AD) 1. Organize student performance data through CTLS for full accessible use by teachers and school leaders. (S) (AdvED) 2. Organize, examine, and adjust instruction based on student progress monitoring data. (AD) Key Actions: (List as many actions as needed in each box.) Utilize the data team process in all grade levels to identify areas of strength/weakness in math and reading and to plan differentiated instruction Implement CTLS and use the formative assessments to guide instruction in math and reading Implement Student Portfolios to document progress in math and reading Implement additional small group reading and math instruction for the lowest performing students K 5 easured by: (Formative and/or Summative) Owner(s): Needed: Results Of Key Actions: (Due June 15, 2017) Priority Status: N = Not et IP = In Progress = et N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Pre/Post assessment data (Data profile spreadsheets) Weekly PLC/Data Team Collaboration notes ilestones CLTS assessment data Student grades/report cards RI and I Student Goal-setting sheets Student Notebooks (work samples) RI and I DRA scores/dra monitoring scores GLOSS Data Profile spreadsheets ilestones ES Teachers Academic TTIS ES Administrators Students None Data Teams completed the process between 6-8 times per year. ath: Kindergarten grew by 59% First: grew by 50% Second: grew by 36%. Third: grew by 23% Fourth: grew by 38% Fifth: grew by 35%. DRA Growth: K: 41% OGL 1 st : 59% OGL 2 nd : 51%OGL 3 rd : 49%OGL 4 th : 52%OGL 5 th : 61% OGL IP

3. Develop and deliver flexible formative assessments in all core content areas for monitoring student progress and adjusting instruction to meet individual student learning needs. (S) Implement CTLS for math and reading Implement flexible/informal and formal assessments in all content areas for instructional adjustments CTLS flexible/formative assessment data Weekly PLC/Data Team Collaboration notes Small Group lesson plans RI/I and Ilestoness Grade Book/Report Cards Student Notebooks ES teachers Academic TTIS Administrators None 1 st through 5 th collaborative teams implemented CTLS for math and reading. Year one training provided throughout the year by TTIS. IP 4. Align critical professional learning by grade level/content area and ensure access for all teachers. (AD) eet weekly in grade level PLCs to collaboratively plan and adjust instruction based on student assessment results Design and implement professional learning to ensure school-wide initiatives are implemented with fidelity, common assessments are valid and reliable, and researchbased instructional strategies are consistent and pervasive Common Assessments Weekly PLC/Data Team Collaboration notes Data Profile Spreadsheets SFPL Plans Wednesday sessions Weekly PLC/Data Team Collaboration notes ES Teachers Academic Administrators SFSD Budget Title I Plan/Budget Teams met weekly to discuss assessments and instructional strategies. Teams met weekly with ACs for PL. New teacher class held monthly to include mentor teachers IP Implement a new teacher class and mentoring program to support beginning teachers, including support for second year teachers New Jaguars Training Camp Agendas entor/entee Observation notes 4 Quarterly grade level collaborative planning days given. eet quarterly as grade level teams to collaboratively plan integrated units for the upcoming quarter Grade Level Unit Plans

5. Increase percentage of students reading on grade level. (S) (Based on CCRPI 2014 Reading Scores) Implement additional small group reading instruction focusing on vocabulary strategies and skills for the lowest performing students K- 5 through (FOCUS 20) RI DRA, Developmental Reading Assessment Student Portfolios (goal/growth charts) Grade Book/Report Cards ES Teachers Academic Tutors Innovation (STEA) Coach 20 Day Plan/Budget Title I Plan/Budget Results of ELA EOG Levels 2-4 is as follows: 3 rd - 36% 4 th - 54% 5 th 45% N Use mentor/exemplar texts and magazines at grade level and higher Lexile levels during reading instruction Grade Book/Report Cards RI, DRAs Ensure a balanced literacy workshop model is being implemented consistently across building (guided reading, shared reading, independent reading) RI DRAs Running Records CTLS Assessment data ilestones Implement daily focus time for vocabulary acquisition RI DRAs CTLS assessment data

6. Increase percentage of student performance in math/algebra at every grade level. (S) (Based on CCRPI ES-S ath & HS Algebra Scores) Ensure ath Workshop model is implemented with fidelity, to include 90 minutes of instructional time (mini-lesson, Number Talks, work-time, guided math groups, and problem-solving) I GLOSS Grade Book/Report Cards ilestones CTLS assessment data Common Assessments Pre/Post (Student Profile Spreadsheets) Qtrly Problem Solving Assessment Data ES Teachers Academic STEA ath Lab Teacher Tutors 20 Day Plan/Budget Title I Plan/Budget Results of math EOG (Levels 2-4) 3 rd : 42% 4 th 53% 5 th -33% N Implement additional small group math instruction focusing on vocabulary strategies and skills for the lowest performing students K- 5 through I Common Assessments (Pre/Post) ilestones Utilize a STEA ath Lab teacher to enrich and extend math instruction Problem-solving rubric Common Assessments (Pre/Post) I Use online programs to develop math fluency Usage reports for Flocabulary 7. Increase number of students academically completing every grade.(s) 8. Other: STEA Integration (Priorities specific to school, division, or area. Can be multiple.) Implement daily focus time for grade level math vocabulary acquisition Provide tutoring for students below grade level in reading and math Continue RTI process and additional year conferences/notifications Incorporate STEA Protocols/Project-based learning throughout the curriculum Incorporate co-teaching and training opportunities for staff and students with the Innovation Specialist (i.e. maker s space & green room) I GLOSS Grade Book/Report Cards ilestones RI I DRAs RTI Data Weekly PLC/Data Team Collaboration notes Weekly PLC/Data Team Collaboration Notes Unit Plans ilestones ES Teachers Tutors Counselors ES Teachers Academic STEA ath Lab Teacher STEA Science Lab Teacher Innovation Specialist 20 Day Plan/budget STE Donation 3 students retained in grades k-2. No students retained in grades 3-5. ES earned CCSD STE certification and GADOE STEA certification. IP

8. Other: Dual Immersion (Priorities specific to school, division, or area. Can be multiple.) Implement a Dual Language Immersion program beginning in Kindergarten Collaborative Planning notes GKIDS DLI Teachers Academic District DLI program implemented in Kindergarten. Long Range Board Goal 2: Differentiate resources for students based on needs. District Focus Areas and Priorities 2016-2019 2016-17 Aligned Actions and easurements (Due June 30, 2017) Focus Focus Area: Differentiate resources for students based on needs. Focus Priorities: (Based on priorities identified by IE 2, AdvancEd-AdvED, Superintendent-S, and Academic Division-AD) Identify local school innovations through system flexibility to increase student achievement. (IE 2 ) Divisionally support local school innovations identified through system flexibility for increasing student achievement. (IE 2 ) Key Actions: (List as many actions as needed in each box.) Incorporate STEA activities/projectbased learning/performance tasks Utilize an Innovation Specialist to support teachers and students in STEA integration (technology, coding, computer science, career pathways) easured by: (Formative and/or Summative) ilestones Collaborative Team Planning Notes CCRPI Owner(s): ES Teachers STEA ath Lab Teacher STEA Science Lab Teacher Innovation Specialist Needed: STEA Donations Results Of Key Actions: (Due June 15, 2017) Innovation specialist collaborated with teams to incorporate STEA activities. Earned GADOE STEA certification. Priority Status: N = Not et IP = In Progress = et N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA

Provide targeted resources for students: 1. not reading on grade level (Lexile) 2. unsuccessful in ath/algebra (Based on 2014 CCRPI ath/algebra scores) 3. not on-track for graduation (S) Implement new Reading Adoption Curriculum in grades K-2 Increase Read 180 and System 44 usage/# of students served Provide tutoring for students below grade level in reading and math Use the Counselors, Academic, and Specialists to provide small group instruction to students not meeting expected grade level targets in math and reading Phonics & Skills Assessments GKIDS Report Cards Grade level data spreadsheets Lexile levels DRA RI RI and I DRA ilestones RI and I ath Pre/Post CTLS assessment data ES Teachers Tutors Academic Counselors 20 Day Plan/Budget RI Proficient and Advanced Levels k- 100% 1 st - 33% 2 nd - 37% 3 rd - 44% 4 th - 38% 5 th - 39% 50 students in grades 3-5 were served daily on System 44 and Read 180. See above EOG and DRA results. IP Collect and analyze RTI and Special Education support to determine level of readiness and appropriate learning environment RTI Data Collection and IEP goals and objectives Identify and provide resources to increase opportunities for advanced, on-level, and remedial students to earn initial credit, embedded credit, dual credit, recovered credit, distance learning, and certifications in areas of student interest. (AD) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA

Other: Social Emotional Learning (Priorities specific to school, division, or area. Can be multiple.) Implement Social Emotional Learning program, Responsive Schools Continue orning eetings Discipline Data Discipline Data SES Vertical PLC ES TeacherS School Counselors ES Admin Cell Tower Funds District Teachers consistently implemented morning meetings. IP Continue School-Wide Behavior System Discipline Data Character Ed Recognition Jaguar of onth Wall/Website Discipline Data Student Survey Other: Dual Immersion Classrooms (Priorities specific to school, division, or area. Can be multiple.) Implement a Dual Language Immersion program beginning in Kindergarten Collaborative Planning notes GKIDS DLI Teachers District DLI implemented.

Long Range Board Goal 3: Develop stakeholder involvement to promote student success. District Focus Areas and Priorities 2016-2019 2016-17 Aligned Actions and easurements (Due June 30, 2017) Focus Focus Area: Develop stakeholder involvement to promote student success. Focus Priorities: (Based on priorities identified by IE 2, AdvancEd-AdvEd, Superintendent-S, and Academic Division-AD) Seek and evaluate stakeholder input for critical processes. (AdvED) Key Actions: (List as many actions as needed in each box.) Increase parent participation on AdvancED surveys by advertising in a variety of methods; analyze results Increase number of parents involved in PTA; promote PTA events that provide monthly opportunities for families to learn and play together easured by: (Formative and/or Summative) AdvancED Survey PTA Board minutes PTA Events Owner(s): Parents ES Teachers Students Needed: Reminders to increase participation through call-outs, memos, email blasts Results of Key Actions: (Due June 15, 2017) Parent participatio n increased on PTA, surveys, and number of parents on school council. Priority Status: N = Not et IP = In Progress = et Increase number of parents on School Council eeting inutes Other: (Priorities specific to school, division, or area. Can be multiple.)

Long Range Board Goal 4: Recruit, hire, support and retain employees for the highest level of excellence. District Focus Areas and Priorities 2016-2019 2016-17 Aligned Actions and easurements (Due June 30, 2017) Focus Focus Area: Recruit, hire Focus Priorities: (Based on priorities identified by IE 2, AdvancEd-AdvED, Superintendent-S, and Academic Division-AD) Seek and hire teachers who meet the qualifications for a highly effective teacher. (IE 2 ) Key Actions: (List as many actions as needed in each box.) Attend local job fairs Continue with interview protocols (admin, panel) Assist current teachers obtain additional certification and to attend district/state/national Professional Learning easured by: (Formative and/or Summative) standards & rubric Owner(s): Admin Needed: Support from HR and TalentEd Results of Key Actions: (Due June 15, 2017) 2 teachers with overall summative of level 2 resigned. All others scored Level 3 or 4. Priority Status: N = Not et IP = In Progress = et Support and retain Seek and hire school administrators who meet the qualifications for a highly effective school leader and who are best suited for the school s environment. (IE 2 ) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Support local school teachers and leaders to improve retention rate. (IE 2 ) (S) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA NA

employees for highest levels of excellence. Ensure that teachers are highly trained in the standards, learning engagement strategies, formative assessments, and student progress monitoring. (AD) Hold weekly professional learning to address standards, research-based Best Practices, and school initiatives Conduct educational book studies on a variety of topics eeting Agendas and minutes Vertical Team Agendas and minutes Admin ES Teachers Academic All key actions implemented. Establish a new teacher class to support novice teachers and follow up sessions for 2 nd year teachers entor meetings Incorporate quarterly collaborative planning days with support personnel Unit Plans Highlight best practices at monthly staff meetings Staff meeting Agendas Provide opportunities for teachers to attend professional learning outside of the district Fully implement and evaluate state system of teacher and leaders evaluation ( and LKES). Use results of and LKES to improve professional performance (IE 2 ) Other: (Specific to school, division, or area. Can be more than one.) Key Trend Data N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Observe lessons and provide feedback Conduct conferences Walk-throughs Observations Admin ES Teachers Academic Admin completed 100% of all and LKES. NA Indicator 2012 2013 2014 2015 2014 District ean Elem. iddle High 4-Year Graduation Rate (Data Source: CCRPI) 5-Year Graduation Rate (D.S: CCRPI) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 78.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 78.8%

Lexile Levels 5 th grade (D.S.: CCRPI) Lexile Levels 8 th grade (D.S.: CCRPI) Lexile Levels 11 th grade (D.S: CCRPI) On-Track for Graduation Career Ready Advanced Academics Stakeholder Satisfaction (Annual AdvancED Survey) 65.4 61.2 62.2 56.2 75% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 85.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 56.4% N/A N/A 75.5 92.1 90% 88% 78% N/A 100 100 100 93.6% 99.2% 55% N/A 9.5 5.2 5.2 15% 40% 50% 96.6 93.8 4.31 4.37 89% 76% 73% CCRPI Score 86.2 62.4 68.4 54 75.7 80 77.7 Iowa Reading Grade 3 55.4 58.6 42.6 35.2 56.6% N/A N/A Iowa Reading Grade 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 54.6% N/A Elementary School Level Calculation Guide Indicator Description Numerator Denominator Details and Data Sources Lexile Levels Elementary Schools Percent of students in grades 3, 4, 5 achieving a Lexile measure greater than or equal to the following on the EOG: Grade 3: 650, Grade 4: 750, Grade 5: 850 Students scoring a Lexile measure 650 (3rd) 750 (4th) 850 (5th) Students with a valid Lexile score on the EOG Data for this element is extracted from the EOG data file and include students with valid scores.

On-Track for Graduation Percent of students in grade 5 passing at least four courses in core content areas (ELA, ath, Science, Social Studies, and World Language) Unduplicated count of 5th grade students passing courses in four core content areas (ELA, ath, Science, Social Studies, and World Language) Enrollment in grade 5 Data extracted from Synergy Gradebook Career Ready Advanced Academics Stakeholder Satisfaction (AdvancED Survey) Iowa Reading Grade 3 CCRPI Percent of students completing a Career Portfolio in grade 5 Percent of students enrolled in Gifted Resource (Target) classes for ELA, Reading, ath, Science and Social Studies Aggregate of all positive responses to all items included on the AdvancEd surveys (parents, students, staff) Percentage of students in grade 3, scoring on-grade level in reading State accountability system whereby Georgia schools earn up to 100 points, based on required performance measurements Number of students completing a Career Portfolio in grade 5 Unduplicated count of students in grades 1-5 enrolled in Target Number of positive ("Strongly Agree" and "Agree") responses on the AdvancEd surveys Number of 3 rd grade students scoring on-grading in reading Enrollment in grade 5 Total Enrollment of grades 1-5 Total number of responses excluding "No Answer" or "No Basis to Judge" Number of 3 rd grade students with a valid test score in reading Local School State recommended target is 4% School Improvement Survey Report, Page 2 - Provided by the Office of Accountability Riverside Data anager NA NA Georgia DOE