Student Success Pathway Outcomes

Similar documents
Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Access Center Assessment Report

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

State Budget Update February 2016

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

African American Male Achievement Update

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Educational Attainment

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Transportation Equity Analysis

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Idaho Public Schools

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Unequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools.

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

Shelters Elementary School

LaGuardia Community College Retention Committee Report June, 2006

Albany Technical College Overview Goals Student Success and Implementation Team Conclusion Next Steps...

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Strategic Planning Guide

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Review of Student Assessment Data

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Accuplacer Implementation Report Submitted by: Randy Brown, Ph.D. Director Office of Institutional Research Gavilan College May 2012

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

John F. Kennedy Middle School

McNeese State University University of Louisiana System. GRAD Act Annual Report FY

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

California State University EAP Updates 2016

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

Executive Council Comprehensive Program Review

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Bellehaven Elementary

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development Volume V, Issue 3 - Fall 2011

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

Best Colleges Main Survey

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

River Parishes Community College

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

NCEO Technical Report 27

Is Open Access Community College a Bad Idea?

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

The mission of the Grants Office is to secure external funding for college priorities via local, state, and federal funding sources.

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE. INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE (Excellence and Accountability)

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Statewide Academic Council Summary July 30, 2015; 10am-12pm , guest PIN

Transcription:

Governing Board Retreat

1 P age TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 2 Start Strong... 4 Key Performance Indicator: GUHSD Capture Rates... 4 Key Performance Indicator: Math Placement Rates... 5 Intervention: East County Education Alliance... 7 Keep Moving... 8 Key Performance Indicators: Persistence Rates... 8 Intervention: First Year Experience Programs... 10 Grossmont College Freshman Academy... 10 Cuyamaca College First Year Experience... 13 Key Performance Indicators: Persistence... 14 Intervention: Acceleration... 15 Complete... 17 Degrees & Certificates... 17 Appendix... 21

2 P age EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Developed by the GCCCD Student Success Committee in 2013, the Student Success Framework provided guidance and structure to the student achievement metrics detailed in the Key Performance Indicators Report. As shown in Figure 2, the Framework is based on a student pathways model for student achievement. Measurement and data definitions were developed collaboratively in the Institutional Research and Planning Committee throughout 2013-2014. This report is to provide the college community with useful information as it relates to students achievement and success as well as to incorporate accountability measures from the Student Success Scorecard. The data collected here is generated both by the California Community College Chancellor s Office (via MIS reporting) and the GCCCD Research Database. Lastly, this is an ongoing process and the future structure of this report will respond to the college s need for data that is aligned with major initiatives associated with Strategic Planning, Enrollment Management, Program Reviews, and other major projects on the campus. Figure 1: GCCCD Student Success Framework Streamlined Student-Centered Pathways Student Equity

3 P age Figure 2: GCCCD Student Success Framework KPI Data Elements GCCCD Student Success Framework ACCESS DEVELOPMENTAL COLLEGE-LEVEL COMPLETION Financial Assistance Pre-assessment Prep Assessment/Orientation/Advisement Long Term Education Plan Registration Before Term Begins Degree Completion Certificate Completion Transfer Outcome Job Placement (Focus on CTE) Licensure/Certification Pass Rates Start English/Math Sequence in First Year Persist in Developmental Sequence Complete Developmental Sequence within 2 Years Update Long Term Education Plan at End of First Year Enroll in Gatekeeper Courses Start English/Math within First Year Pass College Level English/Math Within One Year Continuously Enroll in First Three Primary Terms Complete 30 units of Degree Applicable Work Completion of GE Package within 6 Years Achieve Transfer Preparedness within 6 Years

4 P age START STRONG Key Performance Indicator: GUHSD Capture Rates The Grossmont Union High School capture rates are created by dividing the number recent GUHSD graduates who enrolled at GCCCD for the first time in the summer or fall term immediately following their high school graduation by the overall number of GUHSD graduates (obtained from the California Department of Education DataQuest site). For example, in Fall 2014, 1,530 recent GUHSD graduates enrolled at GCCCD for the first time. In 2013-2014, 4,354 students graduated from GUHSD. Therefore, the capture rate was 35.1% (1,530/4,354). The capture rate has increased by over five percent since Fall 2012. This has occurred despite the significant decrease (-9%) in the numbers of graduates in GUHSD since 2009-2010. Figure 3: GUHSD Capture Rates, 2010-2014 50% 40% 34.2% 35.1% 30% 30.4% 29.8% 29.0% 20% 10% 0% Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 GUHSD Grads: (n = 4,811) GUHSD Grads: (n = 4,865) GUHSD Grads: (n = 4,704) GUHSD Grads: (n = 4,698) GUHSD Grads: (n = 4,354)

5 P age Key Performance Indicator: Math Placement Rates Table 1: Math Placement Levels of First-Time GCCCD Students at Grossmont College, Fall 2011-2015 Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Five-Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Average MATH-088 9.7% 9.3% 9.2% 16.9% 10.3% 11.1% (n = 468) (n = 370) (n = 443) (n = 773) (n = 489) (n = 2,543) MATH-090/096 21.7% 20.5% 17.7% 12.6% 14.9% 17.4% (n = 1,051) (n = 813) (n = 851) (n = 574) (n = 710) (n = 3,999) MATH-103/110 17.4% 16.3% 18.2% 23.9% 15.0% 18.2% (n = 842) (n = 646) (n = 873) (n = 1,090) (n = 715) (n = 4,166) MATH-120 or above 12.1% 11.1% 12.3% 6.7% 13.0% 11.1% (n = 585) (n = 440) (n = 589) (n = 305) (n = 618) (n = 2,537) Did not take placement 39.1% 42.8% 42.6% 39.9% 46.8% 42.2% (n = 1,890) (n = 1,695) (n = 2,044) (n = 1,822) (n = 2,229) (n = 9,680) 1st Time Cohort (n = 4,836) (n = 3,964) (n = 4,800) (n = 4,564) (n = 4,761) (n = 22,925)

6 P age Figure 4: First-Time Students Who Attempt Math within Three Years 100% 80% 60% 61.4% 59.5% 60.6% 40% 20% 0% Fall 2010 Fall 2012 Two-Year Average (n = 5,193) (n = 3,964) (n = 9,157)

7 P age Intervention: East County Education Alliance The Alliance was formed to increase collaboration between the Grossmont Union High School District and the so that students are better informed about their college and career options after high school and have a smoother path to college. Major goals of the partnership focus on not only increasing the number of students who enroll at Cuyamaca or Grossmont College that graduate from a GUHSD high school, but also that these students are ready start college with a running start. In the first few years of the Alliance, faculty teams from English, ESL, and math in both districts are working to align curriculum so that the lessons students are taught in high school better matches the knowledge and skills they are expected to have at college. One of the outcomes of this work will be that students will be able to place directly into a college math or English courses based solely on their performance (i.e., grades) in their high school classes. That is, students will be able to bypass the placement tests altogether through alternative methods (which recent research has shown to be a better predictor of college success). Pilot math articulation agreements have been recently completed at several high schools and recent data seem very promising. Of the 115 students who took advantage of the articulation agreement from feeder high schools in Fall 2014, 78 percent (n = 90) had enrolled in a math course by the end of Fall 2015. This is much higher than the KPI data showing that only 60 percent of first time students attempt math within three years of matriculating. The overall success rates as well as the success rates by math level exceeded the success rates of those students who placed into the courses through the assessment test. In other words, students are just as successful in their math courses when simply using their math grades from high school for placement as those students who were placed by the assessment instrument (ACCUPLACER). Table 2: Course Success Rates by Math Level for Articulated Student Placements Fall 2014 Cohort Success Rate MATH-088 1 100% MATH-090/096 1 100% MATH-103/110 54 69% MATH-120 or above 34 85% Total 90 76% Perhaps more importantly, 40 percent of the cohort (n = 46) has successfully completed a transfer level math course within ONE year, which is identical to the KPI data showing that 40 percent of first-time students achieve this milestone with THREE years.

8 P age KEEP MOVING Key Performance Indicators: Persistence Rates The following charts and tables include only first-time students to GCCCD who were enrolled in the fall term. Figure 5: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates at Grossmont College, Fall 2009-2013 100% 80% 60% 51.7% 52.8% 57.7% 55.0% 52.2% 46.0% 40% 20% 0% Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Five-Year Average (n = 5,767) (n = 5,193) (n = 4,836) (n = 3,964) (n = 4,800) (n = 24,560)

9 P age Figure 6: First-Time Students Fall to Fall Persistence Rates at Cuyamaca College, Fall 2009-2013 100% 80% 60% 48.5% 51.8% 56.0% 55.4% 59.0% 53.7% 40% 20% 0% Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Five-Year Average (n = 2,344) (n = 2,371) (n = 1,690) (n = 1,635) (n = 1,916) (n = 9,956)

10 P age Intervention: First Year Experience Programs Grossmont College Freshman Academy The Freshman Academy at Grossmont College is a first year experience program for students who placed in below-transfer level English (ENGL-098 or ENGL-110) or basic skills Math (MATH-090). The program "links" curriculum together contextualized around a common theme or interest area to form learning communities and provides the students with dedicated counseling services to help improve study skills, understand college resources, and to plan their future schedules. Results from the Fall 2012 cohort show that first time students benefit from the program, performing better than comparable groups of students on course success and retention rates, persistence, unit completion, and completion of the basic skills English sequence. Figure 7: Freshman Academy Overall Course Success Rates for Freshman Academy Students 100% Comparison Group Freshman Academy 80% 71.7% 78.1% 60% 40% 20% 16.9% 15.1% 11.4% 6.8% 0% Successful Not Successful Withdrew

11 P age Latino students (n = 85) showed impressive gains in the program, with 72 percent successfully completing ENGL- 098 and enrolling in ENGL-110 within one year, nearly 25 percentage points higher than other first time Latino students that are recent high school graduates. They also persist at slightly higher rates (Figure 9) and complete more units on average in one academic year (Figure 10). Figure 8: Freshman Academy Basic Skills English Sequence Completion, Fall 2012 Cohort 100% Comparison Group Freshman Academy 80% 71.8% 75.7% 60% 47.0% 52.2% 40% 20% 0% Latino Overall

12 P age Figure 9: Freshman Academy Fall-Spring-Fall Persistence Rates, Fall 2012 Cohort 100% Comparison Group Freshman Academy 80% 65.7% 72.9% 69.8% 76.4% 60% 40% 20% 0% Latino Overall Figure 10: Freshman Academy Average Unit Completion Rates, Fall 2012 Cohort 30 Comparison Group Freshman Academy 20 19.6 20.1 13.4 14.3 10 0 Latino Overall

13 P age Cuyamaca College First Year Experience Implemented in fall 2011, the First-Year Experience program at Cuyamaca College is specifically designed to provide historically disadvantaged and non-traditional incoming college students with a uniquely structured holistic first-year college experience. On average, over two-thirds of the FYE program participants are Latino and over 50 percent of the 2014 cohort are first generation college students. By comparison, 37 percent of the first-time fall 2014 students at Cuyamaca were Latino and 28 percent were first generation college students. The figure below displays the average first semester course retention rates, course success rates, and fall-to-fall persistence rates of all first-time students and the outcomes of Latino students in the FYE program for fall 2011 through fall 2014. Latino students in the FYE program have higher average course retention rates, comparable course success rates, and higher fall-to-fall persistence rates than ALL students who first enrolled at the College during the same fall semester. Figure 11: Retention Rates, Success Rates, and Fall-to-Fall Persistence Rates of Latino FYE Students 100% 85% 94% All First-Time Students Latino (FYE) 80% 71% 69% 67% 60% 57% 40% 20% 0% Retention Rates Success Rates Persistence (Fall to Fall)

14 P age Key Performance Indicators: Math Progress Rates Taken from the Student Success Scorecard, the initial cohort of students for the remedial math progress rates is comprised of those first-time students whose first attempt in a math course was below college-level (MATH- 103/110). The cohort year is based on the academic year of the first attempt. Students with successful outcomes are those students who successfully completed college-level math (MATH-103/110) within SIX years of their first attempt. Figure 12: Remedial Math Progress Rate Five-Year Trends 50% 45.7% Remedial Math Progress Rates 40% 36.3% 37.2% 39.3% 39.1% 36.2% 36.9% 31.9% 36.1% 31.6% 32.9% 30% 29.0% 29.0% 28.4% 28.9% 30.0% 29.7% 30.7% 31.0% SD County High Cuyamaca SD County Average Statewide Average 24.8% SD County Low 20% 19.2% 19.9% 14.3% 15.5% 10% 2004-05 to 2009-10 (n = 595) 2005-06 to 2010-11 (n = 578) 2006-07 to 2011-12 (n = 571) 2007-08 to 2012-13 (n = 575) 2008-09 to 2013-14 (n = 643) Attempted 2-4 Levels Below Transfer Math Student Cohorts

15 P age Intervention: Acceleration Cuyamaca College first began offering its accelerated statistics pathway for students not pursuing math, science, or business majors in fall 2011. Beginning at two levels below transfer, MATH-096 prepares students to enter the transfer level statistics course (MATH-160) after one semester of instruction (see Appendix Figure 17 in the Appendix for a diagram of the different math pathways). Figure 13 compares the results of the accelerated statistics pathway with the traditional math pathway from fall 2011 through spring 2015. On average, 52 percent of students who entered the accelerated pathway completed a transfer level math course within two years of attempting MATH-096. During the same time period, of those students who attempted MATH-090 (i.e., math two levels below transfer), only 14 percent successfully completed a transfer-level math course within two years. In other words, students in the accelerated pathway were 3.8 times more likely to successfully complete a transfer-level math course within two years than those who started in the traditional math pathway. While the accelerated math pathway has not eliminated differing outcomes by race and ethnicity, it has slightly closed the gaps between white students and their fellow black and Latino students. For black students in the District, students in the accelerated math pathway were 4.76 times more likely (33% vs. 7%) to successfully complete a transfer level math course within two years than students in the traditional pathway. Latino students saw comparable gains as well: 4.28 times more likely (48% vs. 11%) to successfully complete transfer level math within two years. Figure 13: Successful Completion of Transfer Level Math within Two Years by Race/Ethnicity 100% 80% Traditional Accelerated 64.5% 60% 48.1% 52.3% 40% 33.3% 20% 7.0% 11.2% 17.0% 13.8% 0% Black Latino White Total

16 P age Cuyamaca College first began offering its accelerated English pathway for students in fall 2012. Beginning at two levels below transfer, ENGL-099 prepares students to enter transfer level English (ENGL-120) after one semester of instruction (see Figure 18 in the Appendix for a diagram of the English pathway). Figure 14 compares the results of the accelerated statistics pathway with the traditional English pathway from fall 2012 through spring 2015. On average, 50 percent of students who entered the accelerated pathway completed a transfer level English course within two years of attempting ENGL-099. During the same time period, of those students who attempted ENGL- 098 (i.e., English two levels below transfer), only 30 percent successfully completed the transfer-level English course within two years. In other words, students in the accelerated pathway were 1.66 times more likely to successfully complete ENGL-120 within two years than those who started in the traditional English pathway. While acceleration has not eliminated differing outcomes by race and ethnicity, gaps between white students and black/latino students have narrowed. Black students have seen nearly a doubling of English sequence completion (39% vs. 20%), whereas Latino students were 1.6 times more likely to complete the English sequence (43% vs. 27%) within two years. Figure 14: Successful Completion of Transfer Level English within Two Years by Race/Ethnicity 100% 80% Traditional Accelerated 60% 55.8% 50.0% 40% 38.9% 43.4% 35.5% 26.9% 30.0% 20% 20.3% 0% Black Latino White Total

17 P age COMPLETE Degrees & Certificates Table 3: Number of Awards by Type at Cuyamaca College, 2009-2015 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 A.A. Degree 162 155 181 182 212 191 A.A.-T Degree -- -- -- 34 82 103 A.S. Degree 215 285 307 403 393 351 A.S.-T Degree -- -- -- -- 18 77 Total Degrees 377 440 488 619 705 722 60+ Units -- -- -- -- -- -- 30.0-59.9 Units 59 79 111 122 90 86 18.0-29.9 Units 69 81 86 92 77 69 12.0-17.9 Units -- -- -- -- -- -- Total Certificates 128 160 197 214 167 155 Total Awards 505 600 685 833 872 877 Table 4: Number of Students Receiving Awards by Type at Cuyamaca College, 2009-2015 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Degree Only 258 301 315 353 432 461 Certificate Only 48 63 70 56 70 60 Both Degree & Certificate 59 73 77 103 70 61 Total Unduplicated Students 365 437 462 512 572 582

18 P age Table 5: Number of Awards by Type at Grossmont College, 2009-2015 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Degrees A.A. Degree 663 587 580 639 780 769 A.A.-T Degree -- -- 14 35 140 196 A.S. Degree 469 575 526 582 629 635 A.S.-T Degree -- -- -- -- 184 278 Total Degrees 1,132 1,162 1,120 1,256 1,733 1,878 Certificates 60+ Units 2 1 2 -- -- -- 30.0-59.9 Units 248 368 575 751 985 1,033 18.0-29.9 Units 120 117 143 122 157 145 12.0-17.9 Units -- -- -- -- -- 94 Total Certificates 370 486 720 873 1,142 1,272 Total Awards 1,502 1,648 1,840 2,129 2,875 3,150 Table 6: Number of Students Receiving Awards by Type at Grossmont College, 2009-2015 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Degree Only 787 707 463 442 464 417 Certificate Only 99 87 110 106 145 147 Both Degree & Certificate 240 340 528 643 835 882 Total Unduplicated Students 1,126 1,134 1,101 1,191 1,444 1,446 Since fall 2010, the unduplicated student fall headcount of Latino students has increased by 14 percent and 24 percent at Cuyamaca College and Grossmont College respectively. Mirroring this trend, the number of Latino students receiving a degree or certificate during the last five years has steadily increased, albeit at much higher rates than the growth in enrollments: at Cuyamaca, the number of Latino students who have received an award

19 P age has more than doubled since 2009-2010. Similarly, the number of Latino students who have received an award at Grossmont College has increased by 87 percent. For both colleges, the growth in the number of Latino students receiving awards has outpaced the growth in Latino enrollments. In fall 2009, about 23 percent of Cuyamaca students and 21 percent of Grossmont students were Latino; but only 20 and 16 percent of students receiving awards in 2010-11 were Latino at Cuyamaca College and Grossmont College respectively. Assuming at least a two-year lag in enrollment and student achievement, the proportion test for 2010-11, shows considerable disproportionate impact at both colleges (Cuyamaca College: 0.85; Grossmont College: 0.75); however, by 2014-15 the proportion of Latino students earning an award either exceeded or neared the proportion of Latino students that were enrolled two years prior. For example, at Cuyamaca College 32 percent of students who received an award in 2014-15 were Latino; in fall 2012, about 29 percent of the overall student body were comprised of Latino students (proportion = 1.11). At Grossmont College, about 27 percent of students who received an award in 2014-15 were Latino, whereas Latino students represented about 24 percent of the students enrolled in fall 2012 (proportion = 0.91). Figure 15: Unduplicated Students Receiving Awards at Cuyamaca College, 2009-2015 300 271 277 250 200 181 219 213 246 177 +36% 150 149 111 124 +113% 100 83 86 50 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 White Latino

20 P age Figure 16: Unduplicated Students Receiving Awards at Grossmont College, 2009-2015 800 700 661 663 600 563 581 +26% 527 524 500 400 351 386 300 258 +87% 200 207 176 211 100 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 White Latino

21 P age APPENDIX Figure 17: Math Pathways, Cuyamaca College Accelerated Traditional Two Levels Below MATH-096 MATH-090 MATH-090 One Level Below MATH-103 MATH-110 Transfer Level MATH-160 MATH-120 MATH-125 MATH-160 MATH-120 MATH-125 MATH-160 MATH-170 MATH-175 MATH-176 MATH-178

22 P age Figure 18: Accelerated English Pathway, Cuyamaca College Accelerated Traditional Two Levels Below ENGL-099 ENGL-098 One Level Below ENGL-109/110 Transfer Level ENGL-120 ENGL-120