SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANTS TO STATES SPECIAL EDUCATION PRESCHOOL GRANTS. U. S. Department of Education. N. C. Department Of Public Instruction

Similar documents
Financing Education In Minnesota

IDEA FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART B, Additional Requirements, 2008

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

As used in this part, the term individualized education. Handouts Theme D: Individualized Education Programs. Section 300.

(2) GRANT FOR RESIDENTIAL AND REINTEGRATION SERVICES.

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

STANISLAUS COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY CASE #08-04 LA GRANGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

FTE General Instructions

California Rules and Regulations Related to Low Incidence Handicaps

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Ho-Chunk Nation Department of Education Pre K-12 Grant Program

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

Program budget Budget FY 2013

Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Guide to the New Hampshire Rules for the Education of Children with Disabilities

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Getting Lost While Trying to Follow the Money: Special Education Finance in Charter Schools

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

State Parental Involvement Plan

Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions

Glenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement

Educating Georgia s Future gadoe.org. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. gadoe.

MINNESOTA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Clinical Review Criteria Related to Speech Therapy 1

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications

Qs&As Providing Financial Aid to Former Everest College Students March 11, 2015

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

THE VISION OF THE BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES

Series IV - Financial Management and Marketing Fiscal Year

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

EDUCATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

John F. Kennedy Middle School

ESE SUPPORT & PROCEDURES ESE FTE PREPARATION ESE FUNDING & ALLOCATIONS

MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM

FY STATE AID ALLOCATIONS AND BUDGET POLICIES

SAMPLE AFFILIATION AGREEMENT

Milton Public Schools Special Education Programs & Supports

Trends & Issues Report

FY2017 TANF HSE/GED Program. Handbook. Oklahoma Department of Human Services and Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education

Madera Unified School District. Wellness Policy Update

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES FOR STUDENTS IN CHARTER SCHOOLS Frequently Asked Questions. (June 2014)

Adult Education and Literacy Letter Index AEL Letters 2016 AEL Letters 2015 AEL Letters 2014 AEL Letters 2013 AEL Letters 10/11/17

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

GENERAL BUSINESS CONSENT AGENDA FOR INSTRUCTION & PROGRAM, OPERATIONS, FISCAL MANAGEMENT, PERSONNEL AND GOVERNANCE May 17, 2017

Pierce County Schools. Pierce Truancy Reduction Protocol. Dr. Joy B. Williams Superintendent

NC Community College System: Overview

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

CHILDREN ARE SPECIAL A RESOURCE GUIDE FOR PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES. From one parent to another...

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Bullying Fact Sheet. [W]hen a school knows or should know of bullying conduct based on a student s

HiSET TESTING ACCOMMODATIONS REQUEST FORM Part I Applicant Information

Flora Macdonald Academy

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

I. General provisions. II. Rules for the distribution of funds of the Financial Aid Fund for students

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

Steve Miller UNC Wilmington w/assistance from Outlines by Eileen Goldgeier and Jen Palencia Shipp April 20, 2010

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

TABLE OF CONTENTS 6000 SERIES

Special Disciplinary Rules for Special Education and Section 504 Students

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) for. Non-Educational Community-Based Support Services Program

Kannapolis City Schools 100 DENVER STREET KANNAPOLIS, NC

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE

July 28, Tracy R. Justesen U.S. Department of Education 400 Maryland Ave, SW Room 5107 Potomac Center Plaza Washington, DC

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY CONTRACT TO CHARTER A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ISSUED TO: (A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY)

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

Schenectady County Is An Equal Opportunity Employer. Open Competitive Examination

CHAPTER XXIV JAMES MADISON MEMORIAL FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION

PROGRAM SERVICE CODE

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

Argosy University, Los Angeles MASTERS IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP - 20 Months School Performance Fact Sheet - Calendar Years 2014 & 2015

Transcription:

APRIL 2006 SPECIAL EDUCATION CLUSTER 84.027 84.173 State Project/Program: SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANTS TO STATES SPECIAL EDUCATION PRESCHOOL GRANTS CAPACITY BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENT (PRC 044) PRESCHOOL (PRC 049) EDUCATION OF THE HANDICAPPED (PRC 060) U. S. Department of Education Federal Authorization: 1. Capacity Building and Improvement Subgrant IDEA-Part B 2. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, Sections 611-617, and Part D, Section 674 as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1411-1417 and 1420. [CFDA 84.027] 3. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, Section 619, as amended. [CFDA 84.173] N. C. Department Of Public Instruction Agency Contact Person - Program Brenda Gilchrest, Consultant Division of Exceptional Children Bgilchre@dpi.state.nc.us (919) 807-3996 Kathy Baars, Consultant (PRC 049) Division of Exceptional Children Kbaars@dpi.state.nc.us (919) 807-3994 Address Confirmation Letters To Gene Bruton, Accountant I N.C. Department of Public Instruction Division of School Business Monitoring and Compliance Section Education Building 6334 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-6334 (919) 807-3726 Agency Contact Person - Financial Gene Bruton, Accountant I Monitoring and Compliance gbruton@dpi.state.nc.us (919) 807-3726 The auditor should not consider the Supplement to be safe harbor for identifying audit procedures to apply in a particular engagement, but the auditor should be prepared to justify departures from the suggested procedures. The auditor can consider the supplement a safe harbor for identification of compliance requirements to be tested if the auditor performs reasonable procedures to ensure that the requirements in the Supplement are current. The grantor agency may elect to review audit working papers to determine that audit tests are adequate.

I. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES In 1975, Congress passed PL 94-142, the Education of the Handicapped Act, which said that all students with disabilities are entitled to a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). The Education of the Handicapped Act has been reauthorized six times since it inception, in 1983, 1986, 1990, 1992, 1997 and most recently 2004. However, the responsibility of states to ensure FAPE by monitoring/auditing the provision of special education and related services in local education agencies has not changed. The Exceptional Children Division believes that monitoring contributes to the development of quality programs for students with disabilities in North Carolina, assures appropriate use of categorical funds, and assists school systems in documenting accountability. Most importantly, monitoring protects the rights of children, parents, and the school system. Since February 2000, the focus of monitoring activities conducted by the Exceptional Children Division has been through the Continuous Improvement Monitoring System. In the North Carolina monitoring system, LEAs include city, county school districts, charter schools and state-operated programs. The purposes of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, Part B) CFDA 84.027 are to: (1) ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education which emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs; (2) ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents or guardians are protected; (3) assist States, localities, educational service agencies and Federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and (4) assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities (Section 601(d) of P..L. 105-17, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997). The objectives of IDEA's Special Education--Preschool Grants Program, CFDA 84.173 also known as the "619 Program," are to provide grants to States, and through them to LEAs, to assist them in: (1) providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, ages three through five (and, at a State's discretion, providing a free appropriate public education to two-year-old children with disabilities who will reach age three during the school year); (2) planning and developing a statewide comprehensive delivery system for children with disabilities from birth through five years; and, (3) providing direct and support services to children with disabilities aged three through five. (20 USC 1419). II. PROGRAM PROCEDURES In North Carolina the funds generated off of 3-5 year olds are used to provide special education and related services to 3, 4 and pre-k 5 s, because children who are enrolled in kindergarten generate average daily membership money and preschool children do not. In North Carolina, Preschool Grant funds are not used for 2 year olds. The amount of funds that the State Education Agency (SEA), the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (DPI), distributes to each local educational agency (LEA) is based upon the following: IDEA Part B (611) (PRC 060) Base payments: Each LEA shall receive a base amount equal to a proportional share of 75% of the FY 1999-2000 IDEA Title VI-B grant. The LEA s portion is calculated based on the December 1998 head count.

Base payment adjustments for any fiscal year after the base year fiscal year are adjusted: 1. If a new LEA or Charter School is created, the LEA s base allocation shall be divided among the new LEA or Charter School and affected LEA based on the relative numbers of children with disabilities ages 3 through 21 contained in the most current December 1 st head count. 2. If one or more LEA is combined into a single new LEA, the base allocations of the merged LEAs shall be combined. 3. If the LEA s geographic boundaries or administrative responsibility for providing services to children with disabilities ages 3 through 21 is changed, the base allocations of affected LEAs shall be redistributed among affected LEA. It will then be based on the relative numbers of children with disabilities ages 3 through 21 contained in the most current December 1 st head count. Funds remaining after distribution of the base shall be allocated as follows: 1. Eighty-five percent (85%) of remaining funds shall be allotted to those agencies on the basis of ADM of children enrolled in public and private elementary and secondary schools within each agency s jurisdiction. 2. Fifteen percent (15%) of remaining funds shall be allotted to those agencies in accordance with their relative numbers of children living in poverty, as determined by the December 1 st free lunch count. Preschool Handicapped (PRC 049) Base payments: Each LEA shall receive a base amount equal to a proportional share of 75% of the FY 1997-98 IDEA Title VI-B Preschool grant. The LEA s portion is calculated based on the December 1996 child count. Base payment adjustments for any fiscal year after the base year fiscal year: 1. If a new LEA or Charter School is created, the LEA s base allocation shall be divided among the new LEA or Charter School and the affected LEA based on the relative numbers of children with disabilities ages 3 through 5 contained in the most current December 1 st child count. 2. If one or more LEAs are combined into a single new LEA, the base allocations of the merged LEAs shall be combined. 3. If two or more LEAs with geographical boundaries or administrative responsibilities for providing services to children ages 3 through 5 change, the base allocations of the affected LEAs shall be redistributed among affected LEAs. This redistribution is based on the relative numbers of children with disabilities ages 3 through 5 contained in the most current December 1 st Child Count. Funds remaining after distribution of the base shall be allocated as follows: 1. Eighty-five percent (85%) of remaining funds shall be allotted to those agencies on the basis of ADM of children enrolled in public and private elementary and secondary schools within each agency s jurisdiction. B-4 84.027-CL 3

2. Fifteen percent (15%) of remaining funds shall be allotted to those agencies in accordance with their relative numbers of children living in poverty, as determined by the December 1 st free lunch count. IDEA, Part B (611) CAPACITY BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENT (PRC 044) The amount of funding is determined by the LEA s/charter School s/state Operated Program s December 1, IDEA, Part B headcount. A funding factor is developed by dividing the total funds available by the total head count. The per-child factor is then multiplied by each LEA s/charter School s/state Operated Program s head count. The individual distribution is then adjusted to equal a minimum allocation of $1,000. Funds are distributed according to the cash request procedures discussed in the DPI Cross-Cutting Requirements, DPI-0. III. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS The NC Department of Public Instruction (DPI) mandates that all testing in the DPI Cross-Cutting Requirements be performed by the local auditor. Please refer to Cross-Cutting Requirements DPI-0. Other procedures that pertain to this program can be found in the US Department of Education Cross-Cutting Section and the Federal Compliance Supplement. A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed Compliance Requirement Funds may be used by a LEA or other operating agency only in accordance with the approved State plan and only for those services or activities in its project application. Audit Objective To determine that expenditures are allowable and are properly recorded. * Obtain a copy of the Budget Balance Reconciliation Report (305/705) from the finance officer and compare to local accounting records for conformity. Obtain a copy of the project plan from the local program coordinator and review expenditures to determine that expenditures are in accordance with the project plan. Review IDEA, Part B Grant, Narrative Section Use of Funds. Compare this section with actual budget to determine funds are used as indicated in approved grant. Review salary expenditures to determine that personnel paid from these funds do not exceed budgeted personnel in approved program budget. Compliance Requirement - A LEA may use Federal funds only for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities. Special education includes specially designed instruction, at no cost to the parent, to meet the unique needs of children with disabilities, including classroom instruction, instruction in hospitals and B-4 84.027-CL 4

institutions, instruction in adapted physical education, home instruction, speech pathology, and vocational education. Related services include transportation and such other supportive services as are required to assist a disabled child to benefit from special education, including speech pathology and audiology; orientation and mobility services; psychological services; physical and occupational therapy; recreation including therapeutic recreation; social work services; medical and counseling services, including rehabilitation counseling. In general, a LEA meets the excess cost requirement if it has spent at least the minimum average amount of funds spent on all children for the education of its children with disabilities before funds under IDEA Part B are used. This amount must be calculated to prove that the minimum average amount of funds spent on all children was expended. Audit Objective To determine that Special Education Federal funds are used only for the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities. Test expenditures and related records to determine if funds were used for special education costs and related services, as listed above. Review the sub-recipient s calculation of the minimum average amount of funds spent on all children and the amount of funds spent on children with disabilities. Verify that at least the minimum average amount of funds spent on all children was spent on children with disabilities before IDEA Part B funds were expended. B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles C. Cash Management E. Eligibility Compliance Requirement - Only students who have been evaluated and determined as having autism, or children who have been identified as mentally disabled, hearing impaired, speechlanguage impaired, visually impaired, behaviorally emotionally disabled, orthopedically impaired, other health impaired, specific learning disabled, deaf-blind, pregnant, developmentally delayed, traumatic brain-injured or multi-disabled, and because of these impairments are determined to need special education and related services, are eligible for participation in this program. (34 CFR 300.7 a,b,c, 300.530-543, 300.750-755) Audit Objective To determine that IDEA Part B, funds were used only for the education of children with disabilities. Review and evaluate procedures for providing an accurate count of eligible participants. B-4 84.027-CL 5

Review records on the number of disabled children served to determine if the number of disabled children reported by the LEA is adequately supported. Determine whether IDEA Part B, funds were used to pay for services to children who are ineligible to participate in the program. If IDEA Part B, funds were used for such children, ascertain the amount of those funds so used. Review procedures for determining participant eligibility and ascertain if they conform to the preceding criteria. Eligibility for Subrecipients The Department of Public Instruction program consultant determines if the eligibility requirements are met when the project and budget are approved. F. Equipment and Real Property Management G. Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking 1. Matching This compliance requirement does not apply at the local level. No testing is required. 2. Level of Effort Addressed in the Federal Compliance Supplement. Compliance Requirement - The LEA must submit Form OMB No. 51-R0003 listing the total expenditures for the first and second preceding years to determine that the LEA has met the Maintenance of Fiscal Effort requirements. This report is due September 30 each year. Audit Objective To determine that the Maintenance of Fiscal Effort form was completed accurately and that the sub-recipient s calculation of funds expended for both the first and second preceding years are correct. If the Second Preceding Fiscal Year amount is less than the First Preceding Fiscal Year, auditor will request copy of Letter of Justification from the Superintendent to the State Director for Exceptional Children located at DPI. Review the completed form and determine that amounts were reported accurately. If the First Preceding Fiscal Year amount is less than the Second Preceding Fiscal Year, the auditor is to review the Letter of Explanation from the LEA s Superintendent to the State Director of Programs for Exceptional Children (located at the DPI). This letter should specifically explain why the amount decreased. Review the sub-recipient s calculation of funds expended for both the first and second preceding years and verify that the amounts are correct. 3. Earmarking B-4 84.027-CL 6

This compliance requirement does not apply at the local level. No testing is required. H. Period of Availability of Federal Funds Addressed in the US Department of Education Cross-Cutting Section. Compliance Requirement - Expenditures may not be incurred before the project begins. Any expenditures prior to the beginning date are considered unallowable and must be refunded to DPI. Audit Objective To determine that no expenditures were incurred prior to the date the project began. Review transactions to verify that no expenditures were incurred prior to the approved application beginning date. I. Procurement and Suspension and Debarment L. Reporting Addressed in the US Department of Education Cross-Cutting Section, NC Department of Public Instruction Cross-Cutting Requirements and the Federal Compliance Supplement. M. Subrecipient Monitoring This compliance requirement does not apply at the local level. No testing is required. N. Special Tests and Provisions Addressed in the US Department of Education Cross-Cutting Section, in the Federal Compliance Supplement, and in the NC Department of Public Instruction Cross-Cutting Requirements. B-4 84.027-CL 7