Overview of 2016 State Accountability, TELPAS, Graduation Rate, SAT, ACT, Advanced Placement, and Dual Credit Dr. Curtis Null October 18, 2016
Special Thanks to the Team Dr. Chris Hines Deputy Superintendent of Operations Jim Kacur Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Education Dr. Debbie Phillips Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Education Shellie Winkler Director of Elementary Education Dayren Carlisle Coordinator of Bilingual and ESL Denise Cipolla Coordinator of Guidance and Counseling Debbie McNeely Coordinator for Advanced Academic Programs Dr. Julie English Director of Assessment and Evaluation Greg Shipp Coordinator of Career and Technical Education Veronica Martin Perkins College Readiness Specialist Isabel López Secretary for the Deputy Superintendent of Schools
Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4
Index 1: Student Achievement Index 1: Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students. Subjects: Combined over Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. Student Groups: All Students and all versions of the test Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II
Index 1: Student Achievement 100 90 85 80 75 70 60 Target Score 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 District State
Index 2: Student Progress Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners. By Subject Area: Reading and Mathematics for available grades. Credit based on weighted performance: One point credit given for each percentage of students at the Met growth expectations level. Two point credit given for each percentage of students at the Exceeded growth expectations level.
Index 2 - Student Progress 60 50 40 42 40 Target Score 22 30 20 10 0 District State
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and up to the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups. Credit based on weighted performance: One point for each percent of students at the Level II - Satisfactory performance standard. Two points for each percent of students at the Level III - Advanced performance standard. By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. Student Groups Socioeconomic: Economically Disadvantaged Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity: Up to two of the lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups on the campus or district (based on prior-year assessment results).
Index 3- Closing Performance Gaps 60 50 46 40 39 Target Score 28 30 20 10 0 District State
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance for students to receive a high school diploma that provides them with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school. Postsecondary Readiness calculates all the following for the All Student group and all students grouped by race/ethnicity, ELL status and special education status. STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level II on two or more tests (unless only one taken) Graduation Score Combined performance across the graduation and dropout rates for: Grade 9-12 Four or Five Year Graduation Rate whichever contributes the higher number of points to the Index. Graduation Plan Score Based on a cohort of students. Two percentages are calculated: The percentage of students graduating under the RHSP or the DAP The percentage of students graduating under either the RHSP/DAP or the FHSP-E or the DLA whichever contributes the higher number of points to the Index. Postsecondary Readiness Component College and Career Ready Graduates 1. Meet TSI Criteria in both ELA and math on the TSI, SAT or ACT; or 2. Complete and receive credit for at least TWO advanced/dual enrollment courses; or 3. Enroll in a CTE Coherent Sequence of courses as part of a four-year plan of study to take two or more CTE course for three or more credits
Index 4 Postsecondary Readiness 90 80 70 60 80 75 Target Score 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 District State
System Safeguards Apply Safeguards to Specific Performance Indexes: Reporting system will disaggregate performance by student group and subject area. Performance rates are calculated from the assessment results used to calculate performance rates in the performance index (Index 1). Target for the disaggregated results are: STAAR performance target corresponds to Index 1 (60%), STAAR participation target required by federal accountability (95%), Federal graduation rate targets and improvement calculations for 4-year rate (83%) and 5-year rate (88%), Federal limit on use of alternate assessments (1% and 2%).
System Safeguards 77 of 84 met = 92% Special Education Performance Reading, Math, Writing, Science, Social Studies ELL Performance Writing and Social Studies
45% District Distinctions 2016 Postsecondary Readiness Results Percent of Eligible Measures in Top Quartile 40% 39% 35% 30% 33% 31% 25% 21% 20% 17% 18% 15% 13% 10% 9% 7% 6% 6% 5% 0%
Campus Distinction Designations Possible Campus Distinction Designations Top 25% Student Progress Top 25% Closing Achievement Gaps Post-Secondary Readiness Academic - Reading/English Language Arts, Mathematics, Social Studies and Science Distinction Designation Targets Elementary, Intermediate and Jr. High school campuses in the top quartile on at least 50% of their eligible measures are qualified to receive a distinction designation for that subject area. High schools in the top quartile on at least 33% of their eligible measures are qualified to receive a distinction designation for that subject area.
Campus Distinction Designations 45% 43% Percentage of Eligible Distinctions Earned 40% 38% 35% 33% 30% 25% 25% 20% 15% 13% 15% 13% 13% 14% 10% 8% 9% 5% 0%
Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System - TELPAS TELPAS is part of an ESSA accountability system for ELLs. States must show annual increases in the progress ELLs make in learning English and attaining proficiency. 4 language domains Listening Speaking Reading Writing 4 proficiency levels Beginning Intermediate Advanced Advanced High
Key Features of Each Proficiency Level Beginning Little or no English ability Intermediate Limited ability, simple language structures, high-frequency vocabulary, routine contexts Advanced Grade appropriate, with second language acquisition support Advanced High Grade appropriate, with minimal second language acquisition support
Year Grade Level/ Number of Students Conroe ISD TELPAS Composite Rating Spring 2016 Results Percent of students in each rating Beginning Intermediate Advanced Advanced High K / 850 51 34 11 4 1 st / 1001 17 37 30 16 2 nd / 991 11 34 38 18 3 rd / 905 7 22 44 27 4 th / 836 6 15 45 34 5 th / 703 5 13 40 41 6 th / 552 5 14 50 31 7 th / 459 5 9 44 41 8 th / 342 6 17 41 35 9 th / 289 10 22 49 19 10 th / 242 17 17 44 23 11 th / 151 2 16 42 40 12 th / 127 2 15 44 39
Conroe ISD TELPAS Comparison % of students who progressed from 1 or more proficiency levels 2014-2015 2015-2016 Kinder to 1 st Grade 61 54.2 1 st to 2 nd Grade 26 29.9 2 nd to 3 rd Grade 28 27.4 3 rd to 4 th Grade 20 23 4 th to 5 th Grade 20 32 5 th to 6 th Grade 15 17 6 th to 7 th Grade 13 19.4 7 th to 8 th Grade 19 20.5 8 th to 9 th Grade 8 16.7 9 th to 10 th Grade 13 16.9 10 to 11 th Grade 19 17 11 th to 12 th Grade 3 20.5
Conroe ISD STAAR Spanish Spring 2016 Results Grade Level Reading % Met Standard Level II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested Writing % Met Standard Level II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested Math % Met Standard Level II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested Science % Met Standard Level II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested 3 rd 56% / 227 46% / 127 4 th 57% / 138 58% / 142 60% / 119 5 th 66% / 65 37% / 59 46% / 56 STATE STAAR Spanish Spring 2016 Results Grade Level Reading % Met Standard Level II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested Writing % Met Standard Level II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested Math % Met Standard Level II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested Science % Met Standard Level II Satisfactory / # of Students Tested 3 rd 64% / 36, 396 63% / 17, 330 4 th 57% / 24, 270 66% / 25, 192 56% / 9,384 5 th 63% / 12, 991 47% / 4, 610 50% / 7, 287
STAAR Performance of Reclassified Students Spring 2016 Grades 3-8 STAAR Performance Satisfactory (Met Level II) of Monitor Year 1 Grade Reading Math Science Writing 3 rd 99% 98% 4 th 100% 95% 89% 5 th 96% 91% 92% 6 th 87% 91% 7 th 86% 65% 78% 8 th 93% 76% Grades 9-12 STAAR EOC Performance Satisfactory (Met Level II) Monitor Year 1 Algebra I Biology English I English II US History 82% 97% 62% 73% 100%
STAAR Performance of Reclassified Students Spring 2016 Grades 3-8 STAAR Performance Satisfactory (Met Level II) of Monitor Year 2 Grade Reading Math Writing 3 rd 97% 96% 4 th 99% 97% 92% 5 th 96% 96% 100% 6 th 91% 84% 7 th 92% 73% 81% 8 th 79% 85% Grades 9-12 STAAR EOC Performance Satisfactory (Met Level II) Monitor Year 2 Algebra I Biology English I English II US History 77% 85% 63% 58% 100%
Graduation Rate Trend 100% 95% 93.20% 92.30% 92.50% 94.20% 95.50% 95.10% 94.70% 95.70% 90% 85% 86.30% 89.30% 84.30% 85.90% 87.70% 88% 88.30% 89.00% 80% 75% 80.40% 78% 79.10% 80.60% 70% 65% 60% CISD Texas
Class of 2014 Texas Conroe ISD 0.80% 4.30% 1.00% 6.60% 2.90% 1.40% 88.30% Graduated Received GED Continued Dropped Out 94.70% Graduated Received GED Continued Dropped Out
Graduation Plans CISD 10-Year Trend: Percentage of Graduation Plans 100% 90% 26.19% 23.62% 23.50% 19.37% 17.64% 17.20% 14.39% 10.60% 10.69% 8.41% 2.56% 80% 70% 60% Minimum Program 50% 40% 69.18% 71.30% 71.94% 75.73% 80.76% 79.40% 81.61% 83.08% 82.00% Foundations Program 30% Recommended/ DAP 20% 10% 0% 4.63% 5.07% 4.56% 4.90% 1.60% 3.39% 4.01% 6.31% 7.31% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 89.03% 2014 Minimum Program Recommended High School Program Distinguished Achievement Program
2016 SAT Performance 560 540 535 520 500 480 494 466 521 508 478 482 500 National Texas Conroe ISD 460 449 440 420 Critical Reading Math Writing
SAT Trend SAT Combined Critical Reading and Math Trend 1150 1100 1050 1084 1082 1084 1069 1069 1051 1061 1065 1075 1056 1017 1017 1013 1015 1011 1010 1010 1010 1006 1002 Conroe ISD 1000 950 999 993 988 987 981 973 976 972 956 State National 934 900 850
SAT Participation SAT Number of Students Tested Trend 2400 2200 2129 2109 2202 2129 2165 2000 1812 1959 1800 1652 1708 1600 1515 1400 1200 1000
National Merit Competition 35 National Merit Semifinalists 2007-2015 32 31 30 27 27 25 23 23 20 16 20 18 15 10 5 0
2016 ACT 2016 ACT Results 25 20 22.1 20.1 20.6 19.4 20.7 23.3 23.7 23.1 23.2 21.3 20.8 20.8 21 20.7 20.6 15 10 National Texas Conroe ISD 5 0 English Math Reading Science Composite
ACT Trend Act Composite Test Trend 24.2 24.1 24 23.8 23.7 23.6 23.4 23.2 23 22.9 23.3 23.2 23.2 23.4 22.9 23.3 23.5 23.2 22.8 22.6 22.4 22.2 14% increase in number of test takers
ACT Trend 25 ACT Subjet Test Trend 24.5 24 23.5 23 22.5 22 23 22.6 22.3 22.2 23.8 23.4 22.8 22.6 24.1 24.1 23.9 23.5 23.2 23.1 23 22.6 22.6 22.5 22.5 22.5 24.3 23.8 23.3 22.9 23.7 23 22.6 22 23.9 23.6 22.8 22.4 24 23.8 23.2 22.6 24.4 24.3 23.8 23.3 23.7 23.3 23.1 22.1 English Math Reading Science 21.5 21 20.5
ACT College Readiness ACT College Readiness Trend: Percent Meeting All Four Subjects 60 50 40 37 35 36 41 43 38 42 43 51 44 30 20 19 20 22 24 24 24 26 26 27 26 10 0 TX Meeting All Four CISD Meeting All Four
Advanced Placement Exams CISD Ten Year AP Trend: Students and Tests 10000 9000 9155 9386 8000 7588 8009 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 4046 1960 5167 5324 2410 2432 5538 2604 6094 2735 6525 3004 3324 3633 4121 4377 1000 0 Number of test Number of Students
2016 AP Mean Scores 2.9 2.8 2.87 2.85 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.51 2.4 2.3 CISD Texas National
Top Advanced Placement Exams Taken Subject Number of Tests Taken Human Geography 918 U.S. Government and Politics 822 World History 806 U.S. History 679 Psychology 565 English Language and Composition 557 Macroeconomics 526 English Literature and Composition 490 Physics 1 474 Biology 457 Statistics 422 Calculus AB 380 Environmental Science 348 Spanish Language 340
Dual Credit with Lone Star College English 1301 English 1302 English 2332 English 2333 History 1301 History 1302 Math 1314 Spring Only Govt. 2305 Speech 1315 Campus Totals F/S Total 786 760 335 252 493 440 73 128 15 1742/1540 3282
Lone Star College Fall Dual Credit Enrollment Trend 2000 1800 1807 1600 1400 1200 1000 950 842 842 957 959 800 729 600 400 200 0
Lone Star College Work Force Programs Program Welding Phlebotomy Computer Numeric Controls Operation and Programming Auto Technology Emergency Medical Technician Enrollment 13 27 5 5 15
CTE Certifications Earned Certification Number of certs. Certification Number of certs. MOS Office Word 2013 260 Pharmacy Tech 9 MOS Office Excel 2013 119 SolidWorks Associate 6 MOS Office One Note 4 Cosmetology Operator License 28 MOS Office Power Point 2013 35 CPR/First Aid/AED 75 MOS Office Outlook 2013 5 Early Childhood AAFCS National Certificate 3 MOS Office Access 2013 13 NCCER Level 1 Welding 6 MOS Office Word 2013 Expert Pt 1 35 OSHA 10 HR 221 MOS Office Word 2013 Expert Pt 2 25 Pre-PAC Education Fundamentals 4 MOS Office Excel 2013 Expert Pt1 19 ServeSafe Food Handlers 203 MOS Office Excel 2013 Expert Pt2 13 ServSafeManagers 1 AutoCAD Certified User 19 Tx Park & Wildlife Hunter Education 25 Autodesk Inventor Certified User 1 TSFA Floral 4 CCEI Child Care Education 10 TVMA Certified Veterinary Assistant Level 1 CGSP Certified Guest Services Professional 3 Total Certifications 1153 7
Plans After Graduation from High School: (Students can provide more than one response.) 4 Year College 53% 2 Year College 26% Voc/Tech School 1% Work full time 8% Work part time 7% Military 3% Other 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
4-Year Universities Class of 2015 College Attended Louisiana State University 10 University of Texas-San Antonio 74 University of Texas- Dallas 21 University of Texas-Austin 107 University of Texas-Arlington 11 University of Oklahoma 28 University of Houston 75 Texas Tech 57 Texas State University 50 Teas Christian University 12 Texas A&M 181 Stephen F. Austin University 22 Sam Houston State University 98 Baylor 53 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200