Assessment Instrument Table: Istation Early Reading (ISIP ER)

Similar documents
CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Using SAM Central With iread

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Test Blueprint. Grade 3 Reading English Standards of Learning

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

South Carolina English Language Arts

Stages of Literacy Ros Lugg

Technical Report #1. Summary of Decision Rules for Intensive, Strategic, and Benchmark Instructional

Shelters Elementary School

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

Essentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Literacy THE KEYS TO SUCCESS. Tips for Elementary School Parents (grades K-2)

Literacy Across Disciplines: An Investigation of Text Used in Content-Specific Classrooms

Richardson, J., The Next Step in Guided Writing, Ohio Literacy Conference, 2010

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Books Effective Literacy Y5-8 Learning Through Talk Y4-8 Switch onto Spelling Spelling Under Scrutiny

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Phonemic Awareness. Jennifer Gondek Instructional Specialist for Inclusive Education TST BOCES

Philosophy of Literacy Education. Becoming literate is a complex step by step process that begins at birth. The National

Reading Horizons. A Look At Linguistic Readers. Nicholas P. Criscuolo APRIL Volume 10, Issue Article 5

Dibels Next Benchmarks Kindergarten 2013

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Weave the Critical Literacy Strands and Build Student Confidence to Read! Part 2

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Kings Local. School District s. Literacy Framework

21st Century Community Learning Center

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

Common Core Standards Alignment Chart Grade 5

Tears. Measurement - Capacity Make A Rhyme. Draw and Write. Life Science *Sign in. Notebooks OBJ: To introduce capacity, *Pledge of

Dibels Math Early Release 2nd Grade Benchmarks

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

Publisher Citations. Program Description. Primary Supporting Y N Universal Access: Teacher s Editions Adjust on the Fly all grades:

Grade 2 Unit 2 Working Together

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

Tests For Geometry Houghton Mifflin Company

Large Kindergarten Centers Icons

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

READ 180 Next Generation Software Manual

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers

QUESTIONS and Answers from Chad Rice?

Jack Jilly can play. 1. Can Jack play? 2. Can Jilly play? 3. Jack can play. 4. Jilly can play. 5. Play, Jack, play! 6. Play, Jilly, play!

Georgia Department of Education

Understanding and Supporting Dyslexia Godstone Village School. January 2017

School Action Plan: Template Overview

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Effect of Word Complexity on L2 Vocabulary Learning

Introduction to the Revised Mathematics TEKS (2012) Module 1

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Plainfield Public School District Reading/3 rd Grade Curriculum Guide. Modifications/ Extensions (How will I differentiate?)

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR BASIC EDUCATION STANDARD I AND II

Kindergarten Lessons for Unit 7: On The Move Me on the Map By Joan Sweeney

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Evaluation of the. for Structured Language Training: A Multisensory Language Program for Delayed Readers

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Answer Key To Geometry Houghton Mifflin Company

1 st Grade Language Arts July 7, 2009 Page # 1

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

MARK 12 Reading II (Adaptive Remediation)

Tools and. Response to Intervention RTI: Monitoring Student Progress Identifying and Using Screeners,

MARK¹² Reading II (Adaptive Remediation)

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

The Bruins I.C.E. School

Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness

CDE: 1st Grade Reading, Writing, and Communicating Page 2 of 27

California Treasures Combination Classrooms. A How-to Guide with Weekly Lesson Planners

Rowan Digital Works. Rowan University. Angela Williams Rowan University, Theses and Dissertations

Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions

UTAH PARTICIPATION AND ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY

Using CBM for Progress Monitoring in Reading. Lynn S. Fuchs and Douglas Fuchs

Transcription:

Assessment Instrument Table: Istation Early Reading (ISIP ER) Element Description Assessment Instrument Information Instrument Name Name of specific instrument (more ISIP ER (Istation s Indicators of Progress for Early Reading), ISIP Español (Istation s Indicators of Progress for Spanish) than vendor name). Vendor Name of the company or organization that produces the instrument. Istation (also known as Imagination Station, Inc.) Purpose (Intended Use) Population Administration Content Area (s) The described purpose and appropriate uses of the instrument. Identify any information about inappropriate uses. Who (which students) could be assessed using the instrument. How frequently the instrument can be administered in a school year, and recommended or required administration windows. Content area or areas being assessed. ISIP ER is It is designed to: Identify children at risk for reading difficulties Provide automatic continuous progress monitoring of skills that are predictors of later reading success Provide immediate and automatic linkage of assessment data to student learning needs, which facilitates differentiated instruction ISIP ER is available for all students in grades Kindergarten through 3rd. (ISIP AR can assess students in grades 4th through 8th) ISIP ER is built to automatically assess students with a short adaptive test once a month. These scores can give the total picture with beginning, middle and end of year (BOY, MOY, and EOY) screener scores, and progress monitoring helps give more formative information. However, a teacher can set further tests for students who are receiving additional instruction in order to monitor them. The teacher can set the additional progress monitoring at intervals of their choosing, such as every two weeks or every week. ISIP Early Reading uses a CAT algorithm that tailors each assessment to the performance abilities of individual children while measuring progress in the five critical early reading skill domains: Page 1

Learning Objectives Specific learning objectives being assessed, at as detailed a level as is provided. This may be "topics" or categories or may be actual learning objective statements. Phonemic Awareness Alphabetic Knowledge and Skills Vocabulary Comprehension Fluency ISIP Early Reading measures progress in each critical component of reading instruction in a manner appropriate to the underlying domain. There are a total of 8 subtests that align to the 5 critical domains of reading, as shown in the table below. Domain Phonemic Awareness Phonics Subtest Phonemic Awareness Letter Knowledge Alphabetic Decoding Spelling Vocabulary Comprehension Fluency Vocabulary Listening Comprehension Reading Comprehension Text Fluency Phonemic Awareness - The Phonemic Awareness subtest is comprised of 2 types of items: Beginning Sound and Phonemic Blending. Beginning Sound - Beginning Sound assesses a student s ability to recognize the initial sound in an orally presented word. Page 2

Phonemic Blending - Phonemic Blending assesses a student s ability to blend up to six phonemes into a word. Letter Knowledge - Letter Knowledge represents the most basic level of phonics knowledge (i.e. whether students know the names and sounds represented by the letters of the alphabet). Letter knowledge is comprised of two types of items: recognition of letter names and recognition of letter-sound correspondences. It is important to note that only the most frequent letter-sound correspondences are included in this subtest. More complex elements such as variant spellings, diphthongs, vowel teams, and r- controlled vowels are embedded in the Alphabetic Decoding and Spelling subtests. Letter Recognition - Letter Recognition is a measure of alphabetic principle that assesses how many letters a student can correctly identify in a minute. Letter Sound - Letter Sound is a measure of alphabetic principle that assesses how many letter sounds a student can correctly identify in a minute. Alphabetic Decoding - Alphabetic Decoding measures the ability to blend letters into nonsense words in which letters represent their most common sounds. Nonsense words are used because students differ in their sight word recognition skills. Spelling - The objective of the Spelling subtest is to determine if children are developing fully-specified orthographic representations of words. Text Fluency - Text Fluency measures a child s ability to read fluently with comprehension. Vocabulary - The vocabulary subtest is designed to test a child s knowledge of "tier 2" vocabulary words, meaning words that are frequently encountered in text but are not typically used in daily conversation. There are two formats: Pictures and Synonyms. Comprehension - In this subtest, children are assessed on their ability to read and understand grade-level sentences and paragraphs. This is accomplished through matching sentences and pictures and sentence completion tasks. Page 3

Matching Sentences and Pictures - Matching sentences and pictures assesses a student s knowledge of semantic and syntactic information where pictures can support their reading. Individual Metrics The scores provided at the individual (student) level. Sentence Completion - Sentence completion measures a student s ability to use word meanings and word order to understand a sentence. ISIP ER provides the following scores for each student: Ability Index - The ability score is an estimate of the student s reading ability. It shows how a student is doing compared to his or her previous performance and to other students at the same grade level. National Norms - National norms for ISIP Early Reading are provided for students in Pre-Kindergarten through Grade 3. These norms enable teachers and parents to know how their students' scores compare with a nationally representative sample of children in their particular grade. The norming samples were obtained as part of Istation's ongoing research in assessing reading ability. Instructional Tier Goals - Consistent with other reading assessments, Istation has defined a three-tier normative grouping based on indices associated with the 20th and 40th percentiles. Students with an index above the 40th percentile for their grade are placed into Tier 1. Students with an index below the 20th percentile are placed into Tier 3. These tiers are used to guide educators in determining the level of instruction for each student. That is, students classified as: Tier 1 (40th percentile and above) are on track and performing at grade level. Tier 2 (between 21st and 39th percentile) are at some risk, are performing moderately below grade level, and are in need of intervention. Tier 3 (20th percentile and below) are at risk, are performing seriously below grade level, and are in need of intensive intervention. Grade Level Equivalencies - Grade Level Equivalencies are scores based on the performance of students in the 2010 2011 norming group. The grade level equivalent (GE) represents the grade level and month of the typical score for students taking ISIP Early Reading. Growth - Growth within ISIP Early Reading can be defined as an increased change in the student s score and improvement in ability over time. District, school, and student growth can be viewed on various ISIP Early Page 4

Reading reports. Individual Comparison Points (cut scores) Aggregate Metrics Information provided regarding how good is good enough performance on the instrument at the individual student level. Comparison information should be available for every individual metric. This may be performance level ratings with specific cut scores. Scores provided at the group level. The group could be a grade level, school, district, or disaggregated groups (e.g. race/ethnicity, gender, IEP status, FRL status). Specify the group(s) and the score(s) provided. Lexile Reader Measures - Istation has partnered with MetaMetrics, developer of the widely adopted Lexile Framework for Reading to link student comprehension scores from ISIP to the Lexile scale. Students are given a Lexile reader measure every time they take the ISIP Early Reading comprehension subtest. The comprehension subtest is typically given to students in Grade 1 through Grade 3. Instructional Tier Goals - The objective of ISIP is to identify students potentially at risk of reading failure. Estimated ability level indices are used from each subtest to determine a student's overall estimated reading ability index. The student's overall reading ability index is used as the dividing line to determine students potentially at risk. Skill goals and criteria become progressively more difficult with each assessment period. Description of Instructional Tiers: Tier 1: Students performing at grade level Tier 2: Students performing moderately below grade level and in need of intervention Tier 3: Students performing seriously below grade level and in need of intensive intervention See end of document for Instructional Tier Comparison Point tables The following ISIP reports are district, area, or classroom level Reports: Executive Summary Report - The Executive Summary Report provides a brief overview of the current ISIP assessment. This report is only available to manager accounts and only provides information for the school or district level. Distribution Report - The Distribution Report shows the number of students performing by ranges of ability scores. This report can be viewed by overall ability and individual subtests. Ability indices, instructional tiers, and percentile ranks are listed in a table below the graph. This report can be used to observe the shape of the distribution and to identify groups of students in need of additional support. Page 5

Summary Report - The Summary Report shows the number and percentage of students at each of three instructional tiers: Tier 1 no risk (above the 40th percentile), Tier 2 some risk (between the 21-39th percentile), and Tier 3 at risk (20th percentile and below). This report may be used by district administrators, principals, or teachers to project year-end outcomes and to judge the effectiveness of instruction. The Summary Report can also be used by administrators to determine which principals and teachers face the greatest challenges. This information can aid in making important decisions about the best use of resources, including the need for professional development. Tier Movement Report - This report shows a comparison of the number and percentage of students who were categorized at each instructional tier of Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 through the current month. Assessments are given each month to monitor growth in critical skills. This report is used to evaluate student growth over the school year. Skill Growth Report - This report shows the progress made in each skill for all assessment periods to date. Progress is measured against performance goals. This report provides an excellent visual representation of the level of support needed. This report may be used by district administrators, principals, and teachers to evaluate instructional supports and determine if modifications to the instructional plan should be considered. If progress is below goal for several consecutive assessments, the instructional plan should be re-evaluated. Only when progress exceeds goal are the instructional supports considered sufficient. This report is used to monitor the classroom s progress in skill acquisition, determine the need for whole-group instruction, identify the level of student support needed, evaluate the effectiveness of instructional support, and discuss student performance in Parent/Teacher conferences. Skill Growth by Tier Report - The Skill Growth by Tier Report shows how students identified in each tier at the beginning of the year progress in each skill assessed as a group. Even if students change tier classification individually, their group designation for this report is based on their first assessment so that this report accurately reflects the progress of each tier group based on who was in that group at the beginning of the year. The values plotted on the graph are the average student performance for Tier 1, Tier Page 6

2, and Tier 3 students. This report is used to monitor the classroom s tier movement by skill and overall reading ability, monitor the classroom s progress in skill acquisition, identify the level of student support needed, and evaluate the effectiveness of instructional support. Priority Summary Report - The Priority Summary Report, available to manager level users only, summarizes the use of the Priority Report (see description below) by averaging the number of Priority Report alerts and how many days it has taken to acknowledge student alerts on the Priority Report. Aggregate Comparison Points (cut scores) Alignment Information provided regarding how good is good enough performance at the group level. Information provided about alignment of this instrument to other In addition, you can disaggregate the Summary, Skill Growth, and Tier Movement reports by the following groups: Gender Race Special Education Instructional Type Economically Disadvantaged English Proficiency Disability Gifted / Talented Homeless Migrant Ethnicity N/A ISIP ER is aligned to Common Core State Standards as well as Colorado Reading, Writing, and Communication Standards. In addition, various studies comparing it to WIDA Prime, DRA2, DIBELS, TPRI, and ITBS are provided at Page 7

instruments, http://www.istation.com/about/studies. standards, etc. Data Reports Description of data reports that are provided/available at the individual and aggregate level(s). The following table describes ISIP ER Reports and their intended audience: Report Title Description Target Users Executive Summary Distribution Summary Tier Movement The Executive Summary Report provides a brief overview of the current ISIP assessment. This report is available only to manager accounts and provides information only for the school or district level. The Distribution Report shows the number of students performing in ranges of ability. The ISIP Summary Report shows the number and percentage of students at each instructional tier for the current month. The Tier Movement Report shows a comparison of the number and percentage of students who were categorized at each instructional tier of Tier I, Tier II, Tier III through the current month. Teachers Teachers Page 8

Skill Growth The Skill Growth Reports show each skill assessed and the progress made by the students through the current month as measured against performance goals. Teachers Skill Growth by Tier Priority Priority Summary Priority Report Student Intervention History Student Summary Handout The Skill Growth by Tier Reports show each skill assessed and the progress made by the students through the current month as measured against performance goals within tier groups. The Priority Report alerts teachers of students needing additional support, and provides lessons based on demonstrated weaknesses. The Priority Summary Report, available to manager level users only, summarizes the use of the Priority Report by averaging how many days it has taken to acknowledge student alerts on the Priority Report. The Priority Report-Student Intervention History is a history of Priority Report alerts for a student, including those from current and prior school years. The Student Summary Handout provides student performance data from the most recently completed ISIP assessment. Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers Parents Technical Quality Information about the technical quality of the instrument. Reference to The latest Technical report for ISIP ER is available on the Istation website. Go to www.istation.com, click on About Us and choose Studies. Technical reports are downloadable from the Technical Reports tab. You can access the report directly at the following link: http://www.istation.com/content/downloads/studies/er_technical_report.pdf. Page 9

technical analysis if available electronically. Overall Reading Assessment Pre-K Kindergarten 1 st Grade 2 nd Grade 3 rd Grade Month Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 August <153 153-159 >159 <176 176-184 >184 <196 196-203 >203 <219 219-227 >227 <231 231-239 >239 September <156 156-161 >161 <176 176-184 >184 <197 197-204 >204 <219 219-228 >228 <233 233-241 >241 October <157 157-164 >164 <179 179-186 >186 <200 200-207 >207 <221 221-230 >230 <233 233-242 >242 November <158 158-166 >166 <182 182-190 >190 <201 201-210 >210 <222 222-231 >231 <235 235-244 >244 December <162 162-170 >170 <185 185-193 >193 <204 204-212 >212 <224 224-232 >232 <236 236-246 >246 January <162 162-171 >171 <187 187-195 >195 <207 207-216 >216 <227 227-235 >235 <236 236-246 >246 February <166 166-176 >176 <189 189-197 >197 <208 208-217 >217 <227 227-235 >235 <237 237-247 >247 March <167 167-178 >178 <191 191-198 >198 <211 211-220 >220 <228 228-236 >236 <238 238-248 >248 April <168 169-180 >180 <193 193-200 >200 <212 212-221 >221 <229 229-238 >238 <241 241-251 >251 May <172 172-182 >182 <195 195-202 >202 <217 217-225 >225 <232 232-240 >240 <241 241-251 >251 June <172 172-182 >182 <195 195-202 >202 <217 217-225 >225 <232 232-240 >240 <241 241-251 >251 July <172 172-182 >182 <195 195-202 >202 <217 217-225 >225 <232 232-240 >240 <241 241-251 >251 Page 10

Letter Knowledge Assessment Month Pre-K Kindergarten 1 st Grade Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 August <143 143-152 >152 <173 173-182 >182 <196 196-204 >204 September <145 145-153 >153 <173 173-182 >182 <196 196-204 >204 October <148 148-159 >159 <176 176-185 >185 <199 199-208 >208 November <151 151-161 >161 <177 177-186 >186 <199 199-208 >208 December <155 155-165 >165 <179 179-187 >187 <199 199-208 >208 January <155 155-167 >167 <179 179-188 >188 <199 199-208 >208 February <160 160-172 >172 <179 179-188 >188 <199 199-208 >208 March <161 161-175 >175 <180 180-189 >189 <199 199-208 >208 April <163 163-176 >176 <180 180-189 >189 <199 199-208 >208 May <167 167-179 >179 <183 183-192 >192 <199 199-208 >208 June <167 167-179 >179 <183 183-192 >192 <199 199-208 >208 July <167 167-179 >179 <183 183-192 >192 <199 199-208 >208 Page 11

Phonemic Awareness Assessment Month Kindergarten 1 st Grade Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 August <173 173-181 >181 <194 194-201 >201 September <173 173-181 >181 <194 194-201 >201 October <174 174-183 >183 <196 196-203 >203 November <176 176-186 >186 <196 196-203 >203 December <178 178-187 >187 <196 196-203 >203 January <179 179-188 >188 <196 196-203 >203 February <179 179-188 >188 <196 196-203 >203 March <180 180-188 >188 <196 196-203 >203 April <181 181-188 >188 <196 196-203 >203 May <183 183-191 >191 <196 196-203 >203 June <183 183-191 >191 <196 196-203 >203 July <183 183-191 >191 <196 196-203 >203 Alphabet Decoding Assessment Month Kindergarten 1 st Grade Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 August <178 178-185 >185 <196 196-203 >203 September <178 178-185 >185 <197 197-204 >204 October <179 179-185 >185 <199 199-207 >207 November <196 196-202 >202 <201 201-209 >209 December <196 196-202 >202 <203 203-211 >211 January <196 196-202 >202 <206 206-215 >215 February <197 197-203 >203 <207 207-216 >216 March <198 198-204 >204 <209 209-219 >219 Page 12

April <198 198-205 >205 <211 211-220 >220 May <200 200-206 >206 <214 214-223 >223 June <200 200-206 >206 <214 214-223 >223 July <200 200-206 >206 <214 214-223 >223 Assessment Month Comprehension 1 st Grade 2 nd Grade 3 rd Grade Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 August <187 187-200 >200 <218 218-230 >230 <232 232-240 >240 September <190 190-200 >200 <219 219-230 >230 <234 234-242 >242 October <192 192-203 >203 <219 219-232 >232 <234 234-242 >242 November <195 195-205 >205 <220 220-233 >233 <234 234-242 >242 December <197 197-208 >208 <222 222-235 >235 <234 234-243 >243 January <202 202-212 >212 <226 226-236 >236 <235 235-244 >244 February <204 204-213 >213 <226 226-236 >236 <235 235-244 >244 March <205 205-217 >217 <226 226-236 >236 <235 235-244 >244 April <208 208-219 >219 <227 227-238 >238 <235 235-246 >246 May <212 212-224 >224 <231 231-240 >240 <239 239-249 >249 June <212 212-224 >224 <231 231-240 >240 <239 239-249 >249 July <212 212-224 >224 <231 231-240 >240 <239 239-249 >249 Page 13

Vocabulary Assessment Pre-K Kindergarten 1 st Grade 2 nd Grade 3 rd Grade Month Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier Tier Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier Tier 2 Tier 1 1 1 3 3 August <166 166-172 >172 <184 184-192 >192 <199 199-211 >211 <218 218-226 >226 <228 228-240 >240 September <169 169-174 >174 <184 184-192 >192 <199 199-211 >211 <218 218-227 >227 <231 231-240 >240 October <169 169-174 >174 <186 186-193 >193 <200 200-211 >211 <219 219-229 >229 <231 231-242 >242 November <169 169-175 >175 <188 188-195 >195 <200 200-213 >213 <219 219-229 >229 <232 232-243 >243 December <169 169-179 >179 <190 190-197 >197 <203 203-214 >214 <221 221-232 >232 <235 235-247 >247 January <169 169-179 >179 <191 191-198 >198 <207 207-217 >217 <224 224-234 >234 <236 236-248 >248 February <173 173-182 >182 <193 193-199 >199 <207 207-218 >218 <224 224-235 >235 <237 237-250 >250 March <173 173-183 >183 <194 194-201 >201 <209 209-220 >220 <225 225-235 >235 <239 239-251 >251 April <175 175-185 >185 <195 195-203 >203 <210 210-221 >221 <227 227-238 >238 <240 240-254 >254 May <175 175-185 >185 <197 197-206 >206 <214 214-224 >224 <229 229-240 >240 <243 243-257 >257 June <175 175-185 >185 <197 197-206 >206 <214 214-224 >224 <229 229-240 >240 <243 243-257 >257 July <175 175-185 >185 <197 197-206 >206 <214 214-224 >224 <229 229-240 >240 <243 243-257 >257 Spelling Assessment Month 1 st Grade 2 nd Grade 3 rd Grade Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 August <199 199-203 >203 <218 218-225 >225 <230 230-241 >241 September <199 199-204 >204 <218 218-225 >225 <230 230-241 >241 October <200 200-207 >207 <220 220-227 >227 <230 230-241 >241 November <202 202-210 >210 <220 220-229 >229 <230 230-241 >241 December <205 205-214 >214 <223 223-230 >230 <231 231-243 >243 January <208 208-216 >216 <224 224-233 >233 <233 233-244 >244 February <209 209-219 >219 <225 225-233 >233 <233 233-245 >245 Page 14

March <212 212-220 >220 <225 225-236 >236 <236 236-246 >246 April <214 214-223 >223 <227 227-237 >237 <236 236-247 >247 May <217 217-224 >224 <230 230-240 >240 <238 238-249 >249 June <217 217-224 >224 <230 230-240 >240 <238 238-249 >249 July <217 217-224 >224 <230 230-240 >240 <238 238-249 >249 Test Fluency Assessment Month 1 st Grade 2 nd Grade 3 rd Grade Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 August <0 0-18 >18 <35 35-59 >59 September <0 0-18 >18 <38 38-62 >62 October <12 12-38 >38 <39 39-67 >67 November <14 14-40 >40 <39 39-67 >67 December <21 21-46 >46 <39 39-67 >67 January <0 0-6 >6 <21 21-46 >46 <44 44-67 >67 February <0 0-6 >6 <21 21-46 >46 <44 44-67 >67 March <0 0-6 >6 <25 25-53 >53 <44 44-67 >67 April <0 0-11 >11 <28 28-53 >53 <49 49-74 >74 May <1 1-22 >22 <37 37-61 >61 <50 50-74 >74 June <1 1-22 >22 <37 37-61 >61 <50 50-74 >74 July <1 1-22 >22 <37 37-61 >61 <50 50-74 >74 Page 15