Overview Timeline and Process for Tenure and Promotion

Similar documents
Instructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Promotion and Tenure Policy

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

Approved Academic Titles

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers

Application for Fellowship Leave

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions

American College of Emergency Physicians National Emergency Medicine Medical Student Award Nomination Form. Due Date: February 14, 2012

Hamline University. College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Article 15 TENURE. A. Definition

Educational Leadership and Administration

August 22, Materials are due on the first workday after the deadline.

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY M. J. NEELEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION & TENURE AND FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES 9/16/85*

Pattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016

Department of Anatomy Bylaws

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Faculty Voice Task Force 5: Fixed Term Faculty. November 1, 2006

GRADUATE SCHOOL DOCTORAL DISSERTATION AWARD APPLICATION FORM

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

Student Organization Handbook

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE

COLLEGE OF SCIENCES & HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT CHAIR HANDBOOK

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS POLICY ON EXPANSION FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

The University of Tennessee at Martin. Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award

Pattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012

Academic Teaching Staff (ATS) Agreement Implementation Information Document May 25, 2017

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

FACULTY HANDBOOK AND POLICY MANUAL

School of Optometry Indiana University

ENGINEERING FACULTY HANDBOOK. College of Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, MI

New Graduate Program Proposal Review Process. Development of the Preliminary Proposal

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

Art Department Bylaws and Policies Approved 4/24/02

GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.

Sacramento State Degree Revocation Policy and Procedure

Hiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents

Graduate Student Grievance Procedures

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

HONORS OPTION GUIDELINES

School of Basic Biomedical Sciences College of Medicine. M.D./Ph.D PROGRAM ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

University of Toronto

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Florida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures

2012 Summer Fellowship in Translational Research & Bioethics International Institute of Bioethics & Patient Care Advancement

BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS PhD PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND DOCTORAL STUDENT MANUAL

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

PHL Grad Handbook Department of Philosophy Michigan State University Graduate Student Handbook

ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Discipline

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Subject: Regulation FPU Textbook Adoption and Affordability

Pittsburgh Theological Seminary Faculty Handbook Faculty Rules and Regulations

Circulation information for Community Patrons and TexShare borrowers

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

California State University College of Education. Policy Manual. Revised 10/1/04. Updated 08/13/07. Dr. Vanessa Sheared. Dean. Dr.

Office of the Provost

How to Take Accurate Meeting Minutes

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING GRADUATE MANUAL

GUIDELINES FOR HUMAN GENETICS

Program Change Proposal:

February 5, 2015 THE BEACON Volume XXXV Number 5

GRADUATE. Graduate Programs

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REGULATIONS PURPOSE

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

K-12 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Regulations for Saudi Universities Personnel Including Staff Members and the Like

CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

2. Sibling of a continuing student at the school requested. 3. Child of an employee of Anaheim Union High School District.

GUIDELINES AND POLICIES FOR THE PhD REASEARCH TRACK IN MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY

GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH

Policy JECAA STUDENT RESIDENCY Proof of Legal Custody and Residency Establishment of Residency

DEPARTMENT OF ART. Graduate Associate and Graduate Fellows Handbook

DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD, SPECIAL EDUCATION, and REHABILITATION COUNSELING. DOCTORAL PROGRAM Ph.D.

with Specific Procedures for UT Extension Searches

BY-LAWS of the Air Academy High School NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY

Transcription:

Overview Timeline and Process for Tenure and Promotion 2015-2016

Resources 1. GUIDELINES AND INFORMATION REGARDING THE TENURE, PERMANENT STATUS AND PROMOTION PROCESS FOR 2015-2016 (emailed to all faculty on 5/18/15)

Resources CONTENTS I. About Tenure, Promotion & Permanent Status II. Eligibility for Tenure and Permanent Status III. Procedures IV. Additional Information for Chairs and Directors V. Additional Information for College Committees and Deans VI. Tenure upon Appointment VII. Annual Review Process VIII. Using the Template

Resources 2. CAREER DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK

Resources CAREER DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK (continued) II. Tenure and/or Promotion A. Tenure Definition and Description B. Tenure and Promotion Timelines (with calendar) C. Criteria for Tenure and/or Promotion 1. First Criterion 2. Second Criterion 3. Third Criterion D. Tenure/Promotion Guidelines 1. For Library Faculty (with steps in the process) 2. For the Tenure and Promotion Committee i. Criterion Worksheets: One Two Three ii. Comparison of Librarian Rank Descriptions

Resources CAREER DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK (continued) II. Tenure and/or Promotion E. Promotion for Non-Tenure Track Faculty F. Sample Letters for Referee Request 1. Referee Letter for Promotion 2. Referee Letter for Tenure 3. Referee Letter for Tenure and Promotion G. Midterm Review for Tenure- Accruing Faculty H. Post-Tenure Reviews 1. Sustained Performance Evaluation for University and Associate University Library Faculty 2. Librarian Emeritus Status Guidelines

Resources 3. United Faculty of Florida Contract Article 19 (Tenure and Promotion)

Disclaimer Obviously, this presentation is not a substitute for an exhaustive review of the information provided in the above resources and in the event of inconsistencies, the above resources are authoritative.

Disclaimer In instances where the Career Development Handbook and the university-level documents are not in agreement regarding the specifics of the packet, the candidate and chair should rely on the university-level documents as authoritative. In instances where the Career Development Handbook expands on the above documents regarding the departmental or Library processes for reviewing the tenure and promotion application, the candidate and chair should rely on the Career Development Handbook.

Disclaimer Any questions or concerns should be directed to the department chair, Library Human Resources, or both.

Determination of Tenure Year Appointment Date Between Mandatory Review Year Packet Submission Year Nov 8 th 2008 - Nov 7 th 2009 2016 Fall 2015 Nov 8 th 2009 - Nov 7 th 2010 2017 Fall 2016 Nov 8 th 2010 - Nov 7 th 2011 2018 Fall 2017 Nov 8 th 2011 - Nov 7 th 2012 2019 Fall 2018 Nov 8 th 2012 Nov 7 th 2013 2020 Fall 2019 Nov 8 th 2013 Nov 7 th 2014 2021 Fall 2020 Nov 8 th 2014 Nov 7 th 2015 2022 Fall 2021

Tenure and Promotion Process Nomination Any faculty member wishing to submit a nomination for promotion must be considered.

Determination of Tenure Year Extension of probationary period maximum 2 years Parental leave (biological, adoptive or significant care responsibilities for child) Sick leave (self or family) Extraordinary circumstances When considering requesting an extension contact the Library HR Office for proper procedures

Determination of Tenure Year Extension of tenure probationary period 1. Faculty makes the request in writing to Chair Anytime but no later than March 1 prior to final year of probationary period for parent and family illness reasons 2. Chair forwards the request to the Dean with a recommendation that it be approved or disapproved 3. Dean forwards to the Provost with a recommendation 4. The Provost has final authority to approve the request

Tenure and Promotion Calendar April Pre-planning, including establishing departmental deadlines and discussing referees. Nominee provides list to Chair. Dean of University Libraries and Library Faculty Assembly establish the membership of the Tenure and Promotion Committee (terms begin October 1).

Tenure and Promotion Calendar May/June/July Nominees & Chairs attend workshop by Academic Affairs Library Human Resources Office (LHRO) sends the Deans and Chairs a list of tenure-accruing librarians with their tenure eligibility dates. LHRO sends all librarians link to the current version of the University Guidelines on the Tenure and Promotion Process. (sent 5/18/15)

Tenure and Promotion Calendar August Department Chair solicits letters of recommendation for nominee.

Tenure and Promotion Calendar September Nominee finalizes packet for review by Department Chair/Supervisor Department Chair confirms with the LHRO the voting eligibility of all tenure home members who may vote for tenure and/or promotion.

Tenure and Promotion Calendar By September 15 Nominee submits packet online for LHRO review through OPT Nominee submits electronic copy of additional materials for internal review only, to LHRO. HR reviews packet online. By September 20 Nominee certifies packet online [from this point forward any changes/corrections will be added to section 33]

October Tenure and Promotion Calendar Department Chair convenes eligible faculty, conducts tenure home vote and records result. Department Chair produces a transmittal letter and provides a copy for the nominee s review. The nominee may prepare a response to the transmittal letter for inclusion in the packet.

Tenure and Promotion Calendar By October15 Dean of University Libraries meets with the Tenure and Promotion Committee to give guidance and answer questions. Tenure and Promotion Committee Chair notifies LHRO of their meeting schedule and the plan for review.

Tenure and Promotion Calendar November Tenure and Promotion Committee meets to review the nominations and summarize nominees' strengths and weaknesses for the Dean of University Libraries. December By December 1 Tenure and Promotion Committee Chair submits the committee s assessments to the Dean of University Libraries. The Deans, including Associate Dean for LIC, meet to review nominations

Tenure and Promotion Calendar Early January The Dean of University Libraries produces a transmittal letter including a recommendation or non-recommendation. The nominee may prepare a response to the transmittal letter for inclusion in the packet Packets certified in OPT and submitted to the Office of Academic Affairs.

Tenure and Promotion Calendar May-June Promotion nominees receive notification regarding the final decision on promotions by the President and the President s recommendation regarding tenure. Tenure nominees receive notification regarding the final decisions on tenure by the Board of Trustees

Tenure and Promotion Calendar July 1 or later Tenure is effective. Promotion is effective. Associated pay increases go into effect on or after this date, as determined by the University.

Tenure and Promotion Process Letters of Evaluation Number of Outside Letters For faculty in the bargaining unit, no fewer than 5 and no more than 6 letters For faculty outside the bargaining unit, at least 5 letters Outside Letters means from individuals not employed either currently or in the past ten years by the University of Florida.

Tenure and Promotion Process Letters of Evaluation Number of Internal Letters For all faculty, there may be 3 to 5 UF evaluators (5 for promotion to University Librarian and Sr. Associate In).

Tenure and Promotion Process Letters of Evaluation The nominee in consultation with their mentor must submit to the Department Chair a list of seven possible evaluators. The Department Chair reviews the list with the nominee and makes additions and/or deletions. At least ½ of the selected evaluators must come from the candidate s list (3 if there are 5) and at least five individuals must agree to serve as evaluators.

Tenure and Promotion Process Letters of Evaluation The Chair sends the list of selected evaluators, with the reasons for choosing these particular evaluators, to the appropriate Dean for review. After review by the appropriate Dean, the Chair notifies the nominee of persons from whom letters of recommendation will be sought.

Tenure and Promotion Process Letters should normally be written by faculty of higher rank than the nominee from universities/institutions ranked similarly to UF. The bio sketch should cover their rank and, if unobvious, the comparability and/or relevance of the institution to UF.

Tenure and Promotion Process The nominee indicates online whether the right to review the letters will or will not be waived prior to letters of evaluation being sent. Those from whom letters of evaluation are solicited must be notified as to whether or not the nominee waives the right to review the letters. Waiver decisions for library faculty over the past 15 years: T&P Packets 69 Waived 45 Did not Waive 23

Tenure and Promotion Process All evaluation solicitations should include a copy of the nominee s vita and the Libraries written clarifications of the University criteria. External and Internal evaluation letters are included in Section 31 along with the bio-sketches which are uploaded online by LHRO.

Tenure and Promotion Process All solicited evaluations that are received must be included in the packet. The Department Chair will use the Libraries template letter to solicit letters of recommendation. A sample copy of an actual solicitation letter must be submitted to the LHRO to be included in the packet. The Department Chair submits the Letters of Evaluation to the LHRO for inclusion the nominee s packet in accordance with the Universities guidelines and in the same order as the evaluators are listed in the bio-sketches.

Packet Tenure and Promotion Process The nominee is responsible for working with the chair/supervisor to prepare the tenure and promotion packet. The chair/supervisor is responsible for providing guidance to the nominee. It is the responsibility of the nominee to see that the tenure and/or promotion materials are complete and accurate.

Packet Tenure and Promotion Process The nominee will be notified of any additions, deletions or changes to the supporting materials in the packet through the OPT system. The nominee then has five days within which to attach a brief and concise response if desired. Any additions or changes after certified in OPT system, are included in Section 33 (further information); the original submissions cannot be changed.

Tenure and Promotion Process Departmental Vote The Chair will hold a meeting of eligible voting faculty to discuss the nomination(s). All tenured faculty members in the nominee s tenure home unit are eligible to vote on a tenure nomination. Those faculty in the nominee s tenure home in ranks higher than the nominee s current rank are eligible to vote on a promotion nomination.

Tenure and Promotion Process Departmental Vote A chairperson, dean, or equivalent administrator who provides a written evaluation of the candidate as part of the tenure or promotion process may participate in the secret ballot of the department or equivalent unit.

Tenure and Promotion Process Departmental Vote Non-tenure accruing promotions: For faculty applying for promotion to Associate In, the dossier will be reviewed and voted upon by departmental faculty at the rank of Associate In or higher and/or Associate University Librarian or higher. For faculty applying for promotion to Senior Associate In, the dossier will be reviewed and voted upon only by departmental faculty at the rank of Senior Associate In and/or University Librarian.

Tenure and Promotion Process The vote, by secret ballot, is taken no sooner than 24 hours following the department meeting.

Tenure and Promotion Process The Chair adds to the packet a letter of transmittal which evaluates the nominee s qualifications for the promotion or conferral of tenure, indicates whether the nominee is endorsed or not, and indicates the results of the departmental vote. The chair s letter must explain the vote whenever 20% or more of the votes are recorded as negative, abstaining or absent. The chair s letter must explain how the list of evaluators was arrived at (i.e. which evaluators are from the candidates list and which are from the chair s list).

Tenure and Promotion Process Once this information has been added to the packet, the nominee will receive a copy of the letter, evaluation, and results of the tenure home vote. The packet will not move to the next step until the candidate either submits a response to the chair s letter, indicates in writing that they will not respond, or 10 calendar days have passed since their receipt of the chair s letter, whichever is first. Such response will become part of the packet.

Tenure and Promotion Process Library HR Office (LHRO) By September 15, the packet should be submitted online for LHRO review along with an electronic copy of the additional materials [including the CV] for internal review. The LHRO reviews for general errors or omissions. By September 20, the packet should be certified by the nominee online.

Tenure and Promotion Process College Tenure and Promotion Committee The members of the Tenure and Promotion Committee review the nomination packets. Members of the committee may request additional information at any stage in the fact-finding process.

Tenure and Promotion Process College Tenure and Promotion Committee After review and discussion of the nomination, the chair of the committee informs the Dean of University Libraries and the LHRO that their review has been completed. A fact-finding report, identifying the strengths and weakness of each candidate, is prepared for the Dean of University Libraries. The Dean may discuss the findings with members of the committee.

Tenure and Promotion Process Dean of University Libraries The Dean reviews the nomination. The Dean of University Libraries may request that the Legal Information Center Associate Dean and the Smathers Libraries Deans provide information and feedback on the nomination. The Dean of University Libraries decides whether or not to endorse the nomination.

Tenure and Promotion Process Dean of University Libraries The Dean s letter is uploaded online. The nominee is notified through the online system. The candidate may submit a written response to the Dean s letter within 10 days. Such response is uploaded in OPT. The packet is forwarded to Academic Personnel with the Dean s letter indicating endorsement or lack of endorsement for tenure and/or promotion.

Tenure and Promotion Process University s Academic Personnel Board or Designee The packet is reviewed by Academic Personnel, who coordinates the review by the Academic Personnel Board.

Tenure and Promotion Process University s Academic Personnel Board or Designee The Academic Personnel Board serves in a fact-finding and consultative role to the president on all nominations received from the deans and directors. The Academic Personnel Board will review the candidate nomination packets and report on the strengths and weaknesses of the records. If there are questions about a nomination packet, the Academic Personnel Board will contact the Dean who in turn will notify the appropriate dean, chair or director and the faculty member so they may respond.

Tenure and Promotion Process Review by the University President In tenure decisions, the President will submit a recommendation to the Board of Trustees for approval. The Dean of University Libraries will be notified of that recommendation and will keep the librarian informed. The President has the authority to make the final decision with respect to promotion nominations to the Associate University Librarian and University Librarian ranks. The Dean of University Libraries will be notified of such actions.

Tenure and Promotion Process Review of Tenure Nominations by the Board of Trustees The library faculty member shall be notified in writing by the appropriate administrative official immediately or as soon thereafter as possible, of the final action taken on the nomination for tenure. If the award of tenure was denied, a separate notice of nonrenewal must be sent to the faculty member by the academic unit responsible for the nomination.

Overview Overview of Timeline of Timeline and Process and Process for Tenure for and Tenure Promotion and Promotion Questions? 2013-2014