Body Mass Index Estimates for Knox County Schools Children: December 2017 Knox County Health Department Knox County Schools

Similar documents
Global School-based Student Health Survey. UNRWA Global School based Student Health Survey (GSHS)

Risk factors in an ageing population: Evidence from SAGE

EDEXCEL FUNCTIONAL SKILLS PILOT TEACHER S NOTES. Maths Level 2. Chapter 4. Working with measures

Wellness Committee Action Plan. Developed in compliance with the Child Nutrition and Women, Infant and Child (WIC) Reauthorization Act of 2004

Process Evaluations for a Multisite Nutrition Education Program

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

Abu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results

Health Literacy and Teach-Back: Patient-Centered Communication. Copyright 2011 NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital

Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

R ESEARCH A RTICLE ABSTRACT

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Aalya School. Parent Survey Results

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Updated: December Educational Attainment

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Outside-of-school time obesity prevention and treatment interventions in African American youth

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

Global Health Kitwe, Zambia Elective Curriculum

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

learning collegiate assessment]

Rwanda. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 10% Number Out of School 217,000

Leprosy case detection using schoolchildren

ScienceDirect. A Framework for Clustering Cardiac Patient s Records Using Unsupervised Learning Techniques

Financing Education In Minnesota

Madera Unified School District. Wellness Policy Update

State of New Jersey

Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) and Global School Health Policy and Practices Survey (SHPPS): GSHS

Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics: Research Papers

Australia s tertiary education sector

Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Q1: Why Is Data Analysis Important? Frequently Asked Questions and Answers on BRFSS Data Analysis and Methods. Q2: How Reliable Are BRFSS Data?

California Rules and Regulations Related to Low Incidence Handicaps

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Educational Attainment

SAGES 2017 ANNUAL MEETING SESSION DESIGN FORM - SAMPLE

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention programs and strategies with the greatest evidence of success

NCEO Technical Report 27

Rural Education in Oregon

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE (H SCI)

Please complete these two forms, sign them, and return them to us in the enclosed pre paid envelope.

A Model to Predict 24-Hour Urinary Creatinine Level Using Repeated Measurements

Evaluation of Teach For America:

NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE (AGLS)

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

The whole school approach and pastoral care

The Early Development Instrument (EDI) Report

HWS Colleges' Social Norms Surveys Online. Survey of Student-Athlete Norms

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Guinea. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 46% Number Out of School 842,000

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Jarron M. Saint Onge

Nutrition 10 Contemporary Nutrition WINTER 2016

Gridlocked: The impact of adapting survey grids for smartphones. Ashley Richards 1, Rebecca Powell 1, Joe Murphy 1, Shengchao Yu 2, Mai Nguyen 1

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

Principal vacancies and appointments

. Town of birth. Nationality. address)

Shelters Elementary School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

46 Children s Defense Fund

TABLE OF CONTENTS 6000 SERIES

UIC HEALTH SCIENCE COLLEGES

Board of Directors OFFICERS. John B. Smith, Jr., MD, Chairman Physician

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

DIRECT CERTIFICATION AND THE COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION (CEP) HOW DO THEY WORK?

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

University of Texas at Tyler Nutrition Course Syllabus Summer II 2017 ALHS

Women in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Is Their Match Rate, and What Specialties Do They Choose?

RHIANNON A. KROEGER Department of Sociology, Louisiana State University 126 Stubbs Hall, Baton Rouge, LA PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS

SUPPORTING AND EDUCATING TRAUMATIZED STUDENTS. CSSP Conference 2014 Barb Bieber

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENCY EDUCATION IN DEVELOPMENTAL-BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS

Probability estimates in a scenario tree

GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY APM REGARDING ACADEMIC APPOINTEES Limitation on Total Period of Service with Certain Academic Titles

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

Pima County, Arizona

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

Peninsula School. District Strategic Plan Dashboard. Slide 1.

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Anyone with questions is encouraged to contact Athletic Director, Bill Cairns; Phone him at or

Grade 8: Module 4: Unit 1: Lesson 11 Evaluating an Argument: The Joy of Hunting

2/3 9.8% 38% $0.78. The Status of Women in Missouri: 2016 ARE WOMEN 51% 22% A Comprehensive Report of Leading Indicators and Findings.

Action Work Plan for School Year Mercer County Schools Wellness Plan. County Sponsor: Amanda Aliff

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

African American Male Achievement Update

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Innovative Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

Proficiency Illusion

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

TIMSS Highlights from the Primary Grades

Transcription:

Body Mass Index Estimates for Knox County Schools Children: 2016-2017 December 2017 Knox County Health Department Knox County Schools

INTRODUCTION Childhood obesity continues to put children at risk for poor health outcomes in the future (National Center for Health Statistics, 2016). Left unchecked, obese children may become overweight adults at greater risk for sleep apnea, depression, type 2 diabetes, and other health conditions. This problem could lead to rapid increases in health care costs and loss of productivity in the workplace in the future. The current estimate for childhood obesity in the United States is approximately 17% and affects more than 12 million children (CDC, 2017, April 10). Less than 5 th percentile = underweight 5 th to 84 th percentile = normal weight 85 th to 94 th percentile = overweight 95 th percentile or more = obese Source: CDC, 2016, October 20 Childhood obesity is measured by comparing children s sex, age, height and weight to growth charts originally developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2000. Children at or above the 95 th percentile are obese, children between the 85 th and 94 th percentile are overweight, and children below the 5 th percentile are underweight (CDC, 2016, October 20). Since 2003, the Knox County Health Department (KCHD) and Knox County Schools (KCS) began measuring the weight and height of students in Knox County Schools using digital scales and stadiometers for BMI measurements. The sampling designs for KCS screenings have varied throughout the years. Since 2014, attempts to screen all Kindergarten, 2 nd, 4 th, 6 th, and 9 h grade students in Knox County Schools have been made. RESULTS In all, 16,410 KCS students in grades Kindergarten, 2 nd, 4 th, 6 th, and 9 th grades from all KCS elementary, middle and high schools were screened between August 17, 2016 and April 27, 2017. Responses varied from school to school based on the available screening resources, absenteeism, and other variables. The complete results of the 2016-2017 screening are displayed in Table 3 at the end of this report. Both proportion estimates (percentages) and estimated confidence intervals at p <.05 (labeled CI ) are presented in the table to allow for comparisons (Friis and Sellers, 2004). Table 1 compares the results of the number of students screened in the targeted grades with the total enrollment figures for 2016-2017. In all, 71.9% of the students in the targeted grades were screened. 2

Table 1: Number and percent of KCS students screened for weight and height among total KCS students enrolled by selected grades in the 2016-2017 school year # Measured # Enrolled % Measured Kindergarten 3,550 4,398 80.7% 2nd grade 3,683 4,530 81.3% 4th grade 3,962 4,782 82.9% 6th grade 3,327 4,487 74.1% 9th grade 1,883 4,617 40.8% Total 16,405 22,814 71.9% Missing ** 5 *Source: 2015 Personal Communication, John Beckett, September 15, 2017 **Data did not identify the respondent s grades. Figure 1: Percent overweight (85.0-94.9 BMI percentiles), obese (95.0 or greater BMI percentile) and both overweight and obese (85.0 or greater percentile) among KCS students: 2010-2011, 2012-2013, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, and 2016-2017* 40 35 30 35.7 overweight obese overweight and obese 33.8 33.1 33.0 29.6 34.1 30.2 25 20 15 18.7 17.9 16.9 15.9 16.9 17.4 16.3 15.6 15.3 14.3 18.0 16.0 16.0 14.2 10 5 0 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Sources: 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016. 2016.2017 Knox County BMI Screenings *Note: Comparisons between the school years should be undertaken with extreme caution due to the varying sample designs As seen in Figure 1, 16.0% of KCS students were obese (95.0 BMI percentile or greater) and 14.2% were overweight (85.0 to 94.9% BMI percentile). More than one out of four KCS students (30.2%) were either overweight or obese (85.0 BMI percentile or greater). There were more obese KCS schoolchildren in the previous school year of 2015-2016 with an estimate of 18.0% than in the 2016-2017 estimate of 16.0%. 3

Table 2: Percent of obese KCS students in Kindergarten, 2 nd, 4 th, 6 th and 9 th grades by age category and Healthy People 2020 objectives for childhood obesity, 2016-2017 2016-2017 % Healthy People 2020 % Exceeding % obese Healthy People 2020 2-5 years 12.3 NWS-10.1: 9.4 6.4 6-11 years 14.9 NWS-10.2: 15.7 Target met 12-19 years 19.2 NWS-10.3: 16.1 3.1 2-19 years 16.0 NWS-10.4: 14.5 1.5 Sources: Healthy People 2020, 2016-2017 Knox County Schools BMI Screening As seen in Table 2, KCS students aged 6 to 11 years have met the Healthy People 2020 for obesity levels within their age group. Healthy People 2020 is an extensive planning document set forth by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It contains public health goals for communities to meet by the year 2020 to help optimize the health of their citizens. For example, Healthy People 2020 MWS-10.4 specifies there should be no more than 14.5% children between the ages of 2 to 19 years obese. At 16.0%, Knox County has not yet met the objective for children aged 2-19 years; nor has it met the Healthy People 2020 objectives for children aged 2 to 5 years or aged 12 to 19 years. Figure 2: Percent of overweight (85.0-94.9 BMI percentile), obese (95.0 or greater BMI percentile) and both overweight and obese (85.0 BMI percentile) among KCS students in Kindergarten, 2 nd, 4 th, 6 th and 9 th grades by gender, 2016-2017 Overweight+Obese Overweight Obese Female 15.0 15.0 29.9 Male 13.5 16.9 30.4 Total 14.2 16.0 30.2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Source: 2016-2017 Knox County Schools BMI Screening At 16.9% obese, males were more at risk for obesity than females (15.0%) in the 2016-2017 school year (Figure 2 and Table 3). When BMI scores for overweight and obese levels were combined, male and female obesity scores were approximately the same with males at 30.4% and females at 29.9%. 4

Figure 3: Percent of overweight (85.0-94.9 BMI percentile) and obese (85.0 or greater BMI percentile) KCS students by kindergarten, 2 nd, 4 th, 6 th and 9 th grades, 2016-2017 9th Grade 16.2 18.8 35.0 6th Grade 17.7 19.6 37.3 4th Grade 16.1 17.8 33.9 2nd Grade 12.1 14.8 26.9 Kindergarten 9.9 10.4 20.3 overweight obese 0 10 20 30 40 Source: 2016-2017 Knox County Schools BMI Screening As seen in Figure 3, among the sampled grades, Kindergarten (20.3%) and second grade students (26.9%) were at less risk for being overweight or obese compared to students in higher grades. Implications for the Community Research indicates that obese children tend to be heavy as they become adults (Ludwig, 2007). As the years progress, obese children may be putting themselves at risk for a variety of weight-related maladies such as orthopedic problems, diabetes, sleep apnea, and possibly shorter life spans. Parents, counselors and others in the community should encourage children to eat high quality foods and play and exercise every day to help them control their weight. Other healthy behaviors such as participating in individual and team sports should be promoted (USDHHS, 2010, January). In addition, the community can work to create more sidewalks, greenways and parks for children to use. All of these approaches could help reduce this problem among children in Knox County. 5

References: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016, October 20). Defining childhood obesity: BMI for children and teens. [Online factsheet]. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. Accessed September 26, 2017 at http:www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/defining.html. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017, April 10). Childhood obesity facts. [Online factsheet]. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. Accessed September 26, 2017 at https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html. Friis, N. Sellers, T. (2004). Epidemiology for public health practice. Joes and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts. Ludwig, D. (2007). Childhood obesity-the shape of things to come. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 235-2327. US Department of Health and Human Services (2010, January). The Surgeon General s vision for a healthy and fit nation. Office of the Surgeon General, Public Health Office, Rockville, MD. US Department of Health and Human Services (2011). Healthy People 2020. Office of Disease Prevention and Health. Washington DC. Questions on this report or do you need further information? Please contact J. Mark Prather, Ph.D. Knox County Health Department 865-215-5185 or mark.prather@knoxcounty.org 6

Table 3: Results of the 2016-2017 KCS BMI screening by gender, age, type of school, and grade N Underweight Normal Weight Overweight Obese Overweight+Obese % (CI) % (CI) % (CI) % (CI) % (CI) Total 16,410 6.0 (5.7-6.4) 63.8 (63.0-64.5) 14.2 (13.7-14.7) 16.0 (15.5-16.6) 30.2 (29.5-30.9) Age Male 8,481 6.3 (5.8-6.8) 63.3 (62.3-64.4) 13.5 (12.8-14.2) 16.9 (16.2-17.7) 30.4 (29.5-31.4) Female 7,929 5.8 (5.3-6.3) 64.3 (63.2-65.3) 15.0 (14.2-15.8) 15.0 (14.2-15.8) 29.9 (28.9-31.0) Less than 5 years 3 * * * * * 5 years 468 9.8 (7.5-12.9) 67.1 (62.7-71.2) 10.7 (8.2-13.8) 12.4 (9.7-15.7) 23.1 (19.5-27.1) 6 years 2,693 8.5 (7.5-9.7) 70.8 (69.1-72.5) 10.3 (9.2-22.5) 10.4 (9.3-11.5) 20.7 (19.2-22.2) 7 years 947 8.3 (6.7-10.3) 71.1 (68.1-73.9) 9.0 (7.3-11.0) 11.6 (9.7-13.8) 20.6 (18.1-23.3) 8 years 2,761 5.6 (4.9-6.6) 66.6 (64.9-68.4) 12.4 (11.2-13.6) 15.3 (14.0-16.7) 27.7 (26.0-29.4) 9 years 1,179 4.2 (3.2-5.5) 63.0 (60.2-65.7) 15.6 (13.7-17.9) 17.1 (15.1-19.4) 32.8 (30.2-35.6) 10 years 2,757 4.9 (4.1-5.7) 61.5 (59.7-63.3) 15.7 (14.4-17.2) 17.9 (16.5-19.4) 33.7 (31.9-35.5) 11 years 996 7.4 (5.6-9.2) 58.0 (54.9-61.1) 16.9 (14.7-19.3) 17.7 (15.4-20.2) 35.5 (31.7-37.6) 12 years 2,304 5.8 (4.9-6.9) 57.2 (55.2-59.2) 17.6 (16.1-19.2) 19.4 (17.8-21.1) 37.0 (35.0-39.0) 13 years 397 * 56.7 (51.8-61.5) 10.3 (7.7-13.7) 12.1 (9.2-15.7) 22.4 (18.6-26.8) 14 years 226 * 58.4 (51.9-64.6) 18.1 (13.7-23.7) 21.2 (16.4-27.0) 39.4 (33.2-45.9) 15 years 1,325 3.8 (2.9-5.0) 62.6 (60.0-65.2) 15.6 (13.7-17.6) 18.0 (16.0-20.1) 33.5 (31.0-36.1) 16 years 334 * 60.5 (55.2-65.6) 17.4 (13.7-21.8) 18.9 (15.0-23.4) 36.2 (31.3-41.5) 17 years and older 20 * * * * * Type of School Elementary School 11,486 6.4 (6.0-6.9) 65.9 (65.1-66.8) 13.0 (12.4-13.6) 14.7 (14.0-15.3) 27.7 (26.9-28.5) Middle School 3,081 6.1 (5.3-7.0) 57.0 (55.3-58.8) 17.5 (16.2-18.9) 19.4 (18.0-20.8) 36.9 (35.2-38.6) High School 1,843 3.6 (2.8-4.0) 61.8 (59.5-63.9) 16.1 (14.5-17.8) 18.6 (16.9-20.4) 34.6 (34.3-36.8) Grade Kindergarten 3,550 8.9 (8.0-10.0) 70.8 (69.3-72.3) 9.9 (9.0-10.9) 10.4 (9.4-11.4) 20.3 (19.0-21.6) 2nd grade 3,683 5.8 (5.1-6.6) 67.3 (65.8-68.8) 12.1 (11.1-13.2) 14.8 (13.7-16.0) 26.9 (25.5-28.3) 4th grade 3,962 5.0 (4.2-5.6) 61.2 (59.7-62.7) 16.1 (15.0-17.3) 17.8 (15.5-19.0) 33.9 (32.4-35.4) 6th grade 3,327 6.0 (5.2-6.8) 56.7 (55.0-58.4) 17.7 (16.4-19.0) 19.6 (18.3-21.0) 37.3 (35.7-39.0) 9th grade 1,883 3.6 (2.8-4.5) 61.4 (59.2-63.6) 16.2 (14.6-17.9) 18.8 (17.1-20.6) 35.0 (32.9-37.2) Missing 5 *Not reported. Unreliable. 7