The Inspection of British Schools Overseas

Similar documents
THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

Newlands Girls School

St Philip Howard Catholic School

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

5 Early years providers

Eastbury Primary School

Putnoe Primary School

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Inspection report British International School

Consent for Further Education Colleges to Invest in Companies September 2011

Introduction 3. Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3. Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3

Qualification handbook

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

Qualification Guidance

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

Irtiqa a Programme: Guide for the inspection of schools in The Emirate of Abu Dhabi

University of Essex NOVEMBER Institutional audit

HONG KONG INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE

École Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN

Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

Teaching Excellence Framework

Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Liverpool Hope University ITE Partnership Handbook

CERTIFICATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN CONTINUING EDUCATION. Relevant QAA subject benchmarking group:

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS

Idsall External Examinations Policy

Charging and Remissions Policy. The Axholme Academy. October 2016

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education

POLICY ON THE ACCREDITATION OF PRIOR CERTIFICATED AND EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING

Anglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

Institutional review. University of Wales, Newport. November 2010

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales

1st4sport Level 3 Award in Education & Training

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Teacher Role Profile Khartoum, Sudan

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

An APEL Framework for the East of England

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

Bilingual Staffing Guidelines

ITEM: 6. MEETING: Trust Board 20 February 2008

General syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy

EDUCATION AND TRAINING (QCF) Qualification Specification

Master of Philosophy. 1 Rules. 2 Guidelines. 3 Definitions. 4 Academic standing

Guidelines and additional provisions for the PhD Programmes at VID Specialized University

BIRMINGHAM INDEPENDENT COLLEGE Examination Contingency Plan. Centre Number: 20635

Assessment Pack HABC Level 3 Award in Education and Training (QCF)

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Pearson BTEC Level 3 Award in Education and Training

OCR Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector Qualification Units

Programme Specification

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

The Referencing of the Irish National Framework of Qualifications to EQF

MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE

St Matthew s RC High School

APAC Accreditation Summary Assessment Report Department of Psychology, James Cook University

ANNUAL SCHOOL REPORT SEDA COLLEGE SUITE 1, REDFERN ST., REDFERN, NSW 2016

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Minutes of the one hundred and thirty-eighth meeting of the Accreditation Committee held on Tuesday 2 December 2014.

Fair Measures. Newcastle University Job Grading Structure SUMMARY

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

Information for Private Candidates

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Lismore Comprehensive School

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Casual and Temporary Teacher Programs

School Experience Reflective Portfolio

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading

Bachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM. Course curriculum National and Institutional Part

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

Training Evaluation and Impact Framework 2017/19

School Complaints Policy

K-12 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Transcription:

The Inspection of British Schools Overseas Background and Context Overseas schools describing themselves as British are not currently subject to any system of formal endorsement recognised by the British government. The Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF), together with the devolved governments for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, is therefore proposing to put in place arrangements for inspection against a common set of standards that British schools overseas can choose to adopt. The intention is to inform parents of pupils in British schools overseas how the standards of British international schools measure up against the standards that apply to independent schools in the United Kingdom. Inspectorates authorised by the DCSF and quality assured by Ofsted will be available to inspect British schools overseas and produce inspection reports which will be made available to parents and prospective parents. This will inform parents and prospective parents about the quality of provision within the inspected school and its compatibility with independent schools in the United Kingdom. An essential element of the inspection is considering the extent to which the British character of the school is evident in its ethos, curriculum, teaching, care for pupils and pupils achievements. By achieving UK inspection based accreditation, participating schools will be able to demonstrate that they provide a British based education that has similar characteristics to an education in an independent school in the UK. This document outlines the criteria for approving bodies for the inspection of British Schools overseas i.e. for the accredited inspectorates that will carry out the inspection work. Independent Schools Partnerships and Strategy Team Inspection of British Schools Overseas 1

Criteria for approving bodies for the inspection of British Schools overseas Introduction There are a number of different factors to take into account in deciding whether or not bodies should be approved to inspect British schools overseas. Inspectorates must demonstrate that they are technically proficient and objective, using well qualified, trained and experienced inspectors. They should have good quality assurance procedures. They must be independent from the schools they inspect, through their constitution, staff appointment arrangements, and any other relationships between schools and the inspection body other than payment of an inspection fee. The managing board should have significant expertise, independent of the organisation concerned, to ensure that an external perspective is brought to bear on the management of the inspection body, including a knowledge of the strengths of both British and international education and inspection. The arrangements have to command public confidence and be publicly accountable because the public needs to perceive the inspection body as competent and independent, with an objective and wide-ranging perspective on school inspection and performance, gleaned from a diverse body of comparator schools. The inspectorate must provide evidence that it has both capacity and the financial security to inspect a minimum number of schools each year and that it can sustain its planning over the cycle of inspections in the future. The revised criteria The following criteria reflect the responses we have received to the consultation and takes on board many of the additional comments and observations made. Technical proficiency, independence and objectivity In order to ensure that an inspection service is technically proficient, the following criteria will be used to assess an application for approval. An inspection service wishing to be approved to inspect British international schools should be able to demonstrate that it: is independent of each commissioning school or commissioning organisation; has relevant expertise and experience of independent school inspection in the UK and/or British curriculum schools overseas; has an inspector body with appropriate knowledge and understanding of international schools; has an inspector body with appropriate knowledge and understanding of independent schools in the UK and their curriculum approaches; has an inspector body that can demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the regulatory requirements for independent schools in the UK and the published standards for British schools overseas; will organise inspection teams that will be well matched against the particular needs of the inspected institutions; Inspection of British Schools Overseas 2

has appropriate systems for recruiting and training Inspectors; will work to a Code of Conduct consistent with that used by national and approved inspectorates in the UK; will provide inspectors with appropriate initial training and keep them up-to-date with educational developments and requirements in the UK; can demonstrate strong arrangements for assuring the quality of their inspections and reports; and can demonstrate effective liaison and working arrangements with other inspectorates and public bodies in the UK and overseas. Each inspection service should propose an inspection framework that describes to the DCSF s satisfaction: the structure and length of the inspection process from planning and notification through to report publication; the composition of the inspection team; the inspection schedules to be used, including a demonstration of how the published standards are to be met; the format of feedback to be provided; and the format of inspection reports and the arrangements for publication. Each Inspection service should explain how the inspections are to be managed including: the programme of inspections; the staffing and general organisation of inspections; the support systems; contingency arrangements; and ensuring that inspections and all associated activities are self-financing. Each Inspection service should explain how inspections are to be quality assured including: the operation of internal quality assurance procedures; the provision of support and guidance for inspectors; assuring the quality of written reports; and holding and maintaining records in accordance with English law, which would be available for scrutiny by the monitoring body where appropriate. Each inspection service applying for approval must be able to show that: it is not connected with the institutions it inspects in any way that might impair, or be seen to impair, objectivity. This would include engaging in advisory work both before and after inspection, and business or other links; inspectors are not connected with the institutions they inspect in any way that might impair, or be seen to impair, their objectivity. Factors that could lead to impaired Inspection of British Schools Overseas 3

objectivity include family ties, business or social links to the proprietor or any member of any organisation named as proprietor, and connections with staff or pupils. Inspectors should not have worked at an inspected school, nor given advice to it, for a period of at least 6 years; inspectors are not biased in any way in favour or against any particular institutions; inspectors make consistent and objective judgements; all lead inspectors have experience of inspecting a wide range of schools. Any other inspectors, not in a lead role, should have relevant experience and expertise and hold QTS or other equivalent qualifications; the inspection service is legally independent from the schools it serves and has independent expertise on its managing board that will ensure that it is aware of best practice and remains up to date with emerging regulatory changes in the UK; the managing board, or equivalent, that controls the inspection service has a minimum of two independent members who are experts in relevant fields and have no connections with inspected schools that could impair objectivity; no other Board members should have connections with inspected schools that could impair objectivity and there are arrangements in place to manage conflicts of interest along the lines of best corporate and charitable practice in the UK; the appointment terms of the Chief Inspector or equivalent allow him/her to exercise full professional independence and the appointment process ensures that the he/she has no prior association with the schools inspected that could impair his/her objectivity; the Chief Inspector or equivalent is required to notify the DCSF of any attempts by schools, associations or other school representatives, to influence the management of the inspection service; and the terms of appointment of all other inspectors will allow them to exercise professional independence and prevent them from inspecting schools that they have engaged with in an advisory capacity. Each inspection service will need to demonstrate that the composition of the pool of inspectors meets the standards below. Inspectors must: have at least five years teaching experience; have held at least one post of significant whole-school responsibility in a British curriculum school, either in the UK or overseas; have undergone a CRB or equivalent check within the last three years and appropriate appointment checks (references, medical declaration and check of qualifications). From November 2010, inspectors will be required to register with the Independent Safeguarding Authority in the UK; have undertaken appropriate training from the inspection service, which includes recent experience inspecting in the UK or in British curriculum schools overseas; Inspection of British Schools Overseas 4

be able to demonstrate an up to date knowledge of educational standards in British schools. This would include experience of teaching or inspecting in the UK within the last three years; and not have been a headteacher or deputy, proprietor or governor of a UK maintained school placed in special measures, or requiring significant improvement, or of an independent school which has been judged inadequate in substantial aspects of its provision (unless there are mitigating circumstances such as having been drafted in specifically to help to improve the school). Lead inspectors must satisfy all the criteria above and in addition: have held a senior post of responsibility in a British maintained or independent school in the UK for at least three years and/or worked successfully as an inspector for a national or approved inspectorate in the UK; have undertaken training to be a lead inspector overseas and been assessed as fit to lead inspection overseas by the relevant inspection service; have no conflicting interest in any of the schools they inspect, other than their personal salary from the inspection service. The Chief Inspector or equivalent of an inspection service must satisfy all the criteria above and in addition: demonstrate substantial knowledge of the service s remit; have substantial experience of inspection work, including at least five years experience as a lead inspector in the UK; be able to demonstrate integrity, impartiality and independence from the schools in the service s remit and have no connection with any member of the board of directors of the inspection service that could impair or be seen to impair that independence. Each Inspection service should demonstrate that they can deploy inspectors experienced and well qualified to cover: a range of different sized schools; early years, primary and secondary age range schools; day and boarding schools; a range of approaches to the British curriculum, including a diverse range of qualifications used for entry into British educational institutions (e.g. A Level/GCSE, igcse, IB, Highers, diplomas and vocational qualifications); schools serving different geographic areas, and pupils from different ethnic and cultural backgrounds. The inspection service will need to demonstrate that they have an internal review process to handle complaints fairly, objectively, within a specified timeframe, and involving members of the inspection service who were not involved in the original inspection. Each inspection service will be required to have a procedure for independent adjudication of complaints. Public and host government confidence Inspection of British Schools Overseas 5

The principal purpose of an inspection report for a British independent school is to report to parents, prospective parents, the school, the UK governments, host nation governments and the wider community, whether the standards expected of independent schools are met. Reports will be published on the internet and will be available from the schools and the inspectorate. UK approved inspectorates have a broad view and are able to call on appropriate expertise where necessary and have high quality internal control procedures in place to ensure that standards do not significantly vary geographically or across time. For this reason we would propose that a minimum number of inspections be set for each international inspectorate to carry out per year. Transitional arrangements The proposals so far apply to future inspection and accreditation of British Curriculum schools in an international context. However, we are aware that some schools will already have been inspected with reference to British regulatory standards by an approved inspectorate. In addition, some schools may have completed other accreditation procedures. We believe that it could be reasonable to take account of recent inspections that demonstrate similar rigour, reliability, and reporting requirements to those required for independent school inspections in the UK, for example when they have been undertaken by one of the newly accredited inspectorates over the past 3 years, using an inspection framework similar to the one deployed under the new arrangements. This would allow the British Council to include these schools on a provisional basis on its list of schools that have undergone inspection as British schools. Quality Assurance and Monitoring Inspectorates in the UK are subject to rigorous DCSF quality assurance procedures, which in England include the monitoring of inspections and reports by Ofsted. We propose that similar arrangements are put in place for inspectorates of British schools overseas. Ofsted will monitor a cross section of each of the inspectorates work when they are inspecting in British schools overseas, in order to ensure that inspectors are conducting the inspections fairly and in accordance with an agreed Framework and Code of Conduct, and reaching judgements which are consistent with those made by all other inspectorates operating in independent schools in the UK and overseas. Ofsted will monitor a sample of inspections and reports, based on an approach which is proportionate to risk. This will also include some monitoring visits as well as the scrutiny of a sample of records of evidence or inspectors workbooks. Inspected schools may also be contacted by telephone and this is intended to reduce the number of monitoring visits made to inspections. Ofsted will also take account of the inspectorates own arrangements for assuring the consistent quality of inspection and reporting procedures. Monitoring visits may take a view on the training, professional development, guidance and on-going support provided for inspectors. The selection of inspections, reports, evidence bases and visits for monitoring purposes will be undertaken according to the model of inspection used by the inspectorate concerned and in proportion to risk. However, HMCI may direct more extensive or additional monitoring where this is deemed appropriate, for example with a new inspectorate. Monitoring will cover all types of school inspection. The monitoring work will be undertaken by HMI who will focus on: Inspection of British Schools Overseas 6

whether inspections establish that schools meet the prescribed standards for accreditation as a British school, as agreed by the DCSF; the extent to which the inspectors judgements of the school s compliance with those standards are accurate; and whether the inspection meets the agreed Code of Conduct and complies with the criteria set out by the DCSF for the approval of inspectorates. Where they do not visit the school inspection, HMI may also scrutinise the evidence base from the inspection to establish whether there is sufficient evidence to justify the judgements made in the inspection report. The school s view of the inspection may be established by telephone or email. In monitoring a sample of school inspection reports, HMI will make judgements on whether: the reports are fit for purpose in establishing clearly and accurately that schools meet the prescribed standards for recognition as a British school, as agreed by the DCSF; and the overall quality of the report is appropriate for its intended readership and complies with the criteria set out by the DCSF for the approval of inspectorates. Any other monitoring activity by Ofsted will be agreed in advance with the Chief Inspector, or an appropriate nominee for each inspectorate. This could, for example, include an examination of the inspectorate s own quality assurance procedures and records, and may also include monitoring the training of inspectors for British schools abroad. Ofsted will provide both verbal and written evaluation of its monitoring work to the inspectors and inspectorates concerned. This feedback will be summarised in a report to the DCSF, if required. The costs associated with Ofsted monitoring activity will be met by the international inspectorate. Inspection of British Schools Overseas 7