Topics Spring IRI Data ITBS data NPR analysis for data summary Various Score Reports ITBS Reminders & Updates Growth vs. Outcome Scatter Plot IRI SPRING DATA Aggregated to the State Level (RF vs. State) Level of Challenge (RF compared to State) Percent of Kindergarteners at Intensive in Fall 7 6 5 3 27 RF - Kinder (n=747) 18 State - Kinder (n=3,817) RF: Began with % of the State s Intensive Kindergarteners 1
Kindergarten Spring 8 Percentages 9 8 7 6 5 3 4 7 18 21 78 72 Intensive Strategic Benchmark RF - Kinder (n=2,355) State - Kinder (n=21,3) RF: Ended with 11% of the State s Total Kindergarteners Beginning of Year Challenges 1 st 5 Fall 7 Intensive 3 13 11 RF - 1st Grade (n=367) State - 1st Grade (n=2,269) RF : Began with 16% of the State s Intensive 1 st Graders 1 st Grade Spring 8 Percentages 9 8 7 6 5 3 81 74 15 3 6 Intensive Strategic Benchmark RF - 1st Grade (n=2,512) State - 1st Grade (n=21,514) RF: Ended with 12% of the State s Total 1 st Graders 2
Beginning of Year Challenges 2 nd 5 Level of Challenge (Fall 7 Intensive) 3 16 14 RF - 2nd Grade (n=43) State - 2nd Grade (n=2,915) RF : Began with 15% of the State s Intensive 2 nd Graders 2 nd Grade Spring 8 Percentages 8 7 6 66 69 5 3 14 13 18 RF - 2nd Grade (n=2,459) State - 2nd Grade (n=,938) Intensive Strategic Benchmark RF : Ended with 12% of the State s Total 2 nd Graders Beginning of Year Challenges 3 rd 5 Level of Challenge (Fall 7 Intensive) 3 21 18 RF - 3rd Grade (n=538) State - 3rd Grade (n=3,716) RF : Began with 14% of the State s Intensive 3 rd Graders 3
3 rd Grade Spring 8 Percentages 8 7 69 71 6 5 3 13 12 18 17 RF - 3rd Grade (n=2,319) State - 3rd Grade (n=,914) Intensive Strategic Benchmark RF: Ended with 11% of the State s Total 3 rd Graders ITBS Determining Proficiency The curve represents the distribution of the original sample. Mean (avg.) NPR = 5 th Percentile in the Original Sample As long as you keep comparing yourself to the same Norm Sample, you can see longitudinal l change by comparing to relative location in the original curve. 5 th NPR The th NPR is the Idaho RF cut-score for proficiency (i.e., and above are proficient). 4
Where to Find NPR Scores Use the Report Titled: List of Student Scores Where to Find NPR Scores Reading Profile Total, a composite score, is used for overall analysis. Subtests can be used to disaggregate and plan later. Use the Reading Total for Grades 1-3 th NPR or above = proficient 39 th NPR and below = not proficient 5
ITBS Data Summary Procedure Step 1: (for each teacher) Count the total number of students in a class. Count the number of students that have a Reading Profile Total NPR score of or above. Mrs. Smith has 27 students. 18 of her students had scores of NPR or better. That is 18/27 for one class. ITBS Data Summary Procedure Step 2: (for each grade) Add the total number of students in a grade. Add the total number of student scores and above in the same grade. Divide the number of proficient students by the total number of students tested. 3 rd Grade: Mrs. Smith has 27 students. 18 are proficient. Mr. Jones has 25 students. 19 are proficient. Ms. Juarez has 26 students. 21 are proficient. Mr. Jackson has 29 students. are proficient. 78 7 = 73% of 3 rd Grade is proficient. 18 27 19 25 21 26 + +29 78 7 Basic Formula SP 1 + SP 2 + SP 3 + SP 4 (total # proficient) = Percentage of Students TS 1 + TS 2 + TS 3 + TS in Grade Level that are 4 (total # tested) Proficient SP 1 = Students at Proficient 1st Class TS 1 = Total Students Tested 1st Class 3 rd Grade: Mrs. Smith has 27 students. 18 are proficient. Mr. Jones has 25 students. 19 are proficient. Ms. Juarez has 26 students. 21 are proficient. Mr. Jackson has 29 students. are proficient. 78 7 = 73% of 3 rd Grade is proficient. 18 27 19 25 21 26 + +29 78 7 6
ITBS Data Summary Procedure Step 3: (for the school) Record the percentages of students that are proficient at each grade level on the Data Summary Sheet for your school. These data can then be used for program evaluation and Action Planning when used alongside of the growth data. This process can be used for Grades 1-3. Other ITBS Resources School Summary Class Summary Primary Reading Profile for [Student Name] Two students accidentally filled in the bubbles. 7
Ms. Santana AM Ms. Pfost FYI For those interested The costs incurred in purchasing the ITBS for RF enable you to use the entire battery: Reading, Language, Math. If your school is so inclined, and you want to have a second data point beside ISAT for program evaluation in other subjects, your staff may choose to administer the entire battery (beyond what we require for RF) without any extra cost. The data would come back to you with the Reading scores. 8
Reminders and Updates irm Interactive Results Manager (Riverside s Online Data Management System) New item for barcode templates (enrollment date) es At Proficient - All Students ITBS Outcome Percentage 9 85 8 75 7 65 6 55 RF AVG RF Growth Low Growth / Growth 57% Goal 7% (Median: 56%) High Outcome High Growth / High Outcome M: 54, 78 A: 34, 6 C:, 68 D: 41, 68 F: 44, 64 H: 47, 62 B: 35, G: 45, 59 5 Low Growth / Low Outcome 45 35 E : 44, 47 J: 5, 7 Q: 57, 77 K: 51, 65 V: 65, 64 R, S, & T: I: 5, 62 58, 62 58, 62-58, 62 W: 66, 6 O: 55, 58 U: 61, 59 N: 55, 56 P: 56, 55 L: 52, 41 X: 67, 54 Y: 68, 42 AA:71, 75 BB: 72, 62 Z: 7, 52 CC: 78, 68 High Growth / Low Outcome 3 35 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 IRI Adequate Growth Percentages Among At-Risk Students EE: 89, 86 DD: 87, 76 Series1 Linear (Series1) RF Outcome Goal 7% RF AVG Outcome 61.7% (Median: 61.9%) 9
So what? Here are some questions to consider. How can our school coordinate what we know about our outcome and growth data to improve our services to students? Would our school be considered low growth or low outcome? Is our current Action Plan likely l to change this? Take a moment to discuss these and any other thoughts you might have with your school team about how these data and analyses might help in your school s improvement process.