School Accountability Report

Similar documents
A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Shelters Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Cooper Upper Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Clark Lane Middle School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

World s Best Workforce Plan

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Somerset Academy of Las Vegas Disciplinary Procedures

Hokulani Elementary School

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Sig Rogich Middle School Disciplinary Procedures

Transportation Equity Analysis

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Academic Advising and Career Exploration. PLTW State Conference 2015 Bayless School District

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Educational Attainment

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Kahului Elementary School

Section 6 DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES

State of New Jersey

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Executive Summary. Hamilton High School

Iva Meairs Elementary School

El Toro Elementary School

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Financing Education In Minnesota

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

COURSE SELECTION WORKSHEETS

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

YOUR FUTURE IN IB. Why is the International Baccalaureate a great choice for you? Mrs. Debbie Woolard IB Director Marietta High School

Pierce County Schools. Pierce Truancy Reduction Protocol. Dr. Joy B. Williams Superintendent

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

The Sarasota County Pre International Baccalaureate International Baccalaureate Programs at Riverview High School

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey


Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Discipline

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Georgia Department of Education

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

University of Arizona

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

Rural Education in Oregon

Raw Data Files Instructions

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

46 Children s Defense Fund

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

JUNIOR HIGH SPORTS MANUAL GRADES 7 & 8

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

Transcription:

Clifford J. Junior High School Clark County School District 4410 S. Juliano Rd. Bevelyn R. Smothers, Principal Las Vegas, NV 89147 Grade Levels: 6-8 Ph: 702-799-2540, Fax: 702-799-2563 Website: ljhs.edublogs.org 2013-2014 School Accountability Report For more information visit www.nevadareportcard.com Mission Statement The mission of Clifford J. Junior High School is to increase the academic achievement of all students by providing them a rigorous and relevant standards-based curriculum, while enhancing, promoting and demonstrating effective and positive relationships. Principal's Highlights The students and teachers of Jr. High School proudly maintain a high standard of excellence in the areas of academics, fine arts and athletics. 750 of our students participated in our award-winning band, choir and orchestra programs, and all received superior ratings. Our teachers successfully implemented the SpringBoard curriculum, which enhances rigor and student-engaged activities. Over 200 students participated in our English language arts and math CRT Boot Camps during the 2013-14 school year. Approximately one-third of all students were enrolled in accelerated English/reading and math classes during the 2013-14 school year. Our teachers held weekly Structured Teacher Planning Time (STPT) meetings, in order to develop rigorous lessons, based on Common Core State Standards. The percent of students keeping up in math increased from 44% to 46%. The percent of students keeping up in reading increased from 69% to 72%. The ELL subgroup doubled in proficiency from 11% in 2012 to 23% in 2013. Our Algebra I students had a 90% pass rate on the distict Semester I exam; 25% of the students attended Math Institute as an Early Bird class. Goals and Objectives Goal 1 Jr. High School will increase the percentage of students proficient in reading. Objective(s): Increase the percent of Grade 8 Students in ELA from 67% to 70% by 2014, as measured by the School Growth Summary Report. Increase the percent of IEP students catching-up in ELA from 8% to 10% by 2014 as measured by the School Growth Summary Report. Goal 2 Jr. High School will increase the percentage of students proficient in mathematics. Objective(s): Increase the percent of Grade 6 students catching-up in math from 9% to 20% by 2014, as measured by the School Growth Summary Report. Increase the percent of IEP students catching-up in math from 4% to 9% by 2014, as measured by the School Growth Summary Report. School Communication Efforts Junior High School utilized traditional and innovative resources to consistently communicate with our community. Open House, Family Nights, Parent Newsletters, the Parent Advisory Committee (PAC), Doughnuts with Dads, Muffins with Moms, and Student Planners are some examples. utilized the ParentLink interactive communication tool to provide parents with opportunities to regularly monitor their child's academic progress, citizenship, academic history, and attendance. also utilized the ParentLink autodialer feature to deliver special messages to parents with timely information about school events, PAC meeting dates, tutoring sessions, and standardized testing. Fifth grade parent orientation activities in the spring provided important information to ensure a smooth transition from elementary to middle school and Welcome Back Day activities in mid-august were designed to adequately prepare students for a successful school year. Finally, Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 1 of 7

's website provided current up-to-date information, as well as links to other educational resources. Student of the Month breakfasts and Awards Ceremonies were also implemented for families to celebrate students' successes. Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 2 of 7

Demographics and Student Information Data are provided by the Nevada Department of Education from the state student information system. Gender, race/ethnicity, and special student populations are reported as of count day. # Am In/ AK Native Ethnicity Asian Hispanic Black White Pacific Islander Two or More Races Male Gender Female # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % State 451,730 4,782 1.06% 25,264 5.59% 183,212 40.56% 44,795 9.92% 162,544 35.98% 5,994 1.33% 25,139 5.57% 232,790 51.53% 218,940 48.47% Clark 314,636 1,470 0.47% 20,646 6.56% 139,705 44.40% 39,047 12.41% 90,040 28.62% 4,746 1.51% 18,982 6.03% 162,225 51.56% 152,411 48.44% 1,465 - - 268 18.29% 505 34.47% 183 12.49% 408 27.85% 16 1.09% 80 5.46% 765 52.22% 700 47.78% Data as of: Count Day Special Populations # IEP ELL FRL Migrant # % # % # % # % State 451,730 51,946 11.50% 67,836 15.02% 239,170 52.95% 77 0.02% Clark 314,636 35,073 11.15% 51,931 16.51% 178,690 56.79% 0 0.00% 1,465 147 10.03% 172 11.74% 785 53.58% 0 0.00% Data as of: Count Day IEP= Students with disablities ELL= Students who are English Language Learners FRL= Students qualifying for Free/Reduced Price Lunch Student Average Daily Attendance (ADA) Student Average Daily Attendance (ADA) is the percentage of the school enrollment in attendance on an "average school day" as of the 100th day of school. All Students Am In/ AK Native Asian Hispanic Black White Pacific Islander Two or More Races IEP ELL FRL State 94.90% 93.30% 97.00% 94.80% 93.60% 94.90% 94.80% 94.80% 93.40% 95.40% 94.40% Clark 94.80% 93.40% 97.00% 94.80% 93.50% 95.00% 94.90% 94.90% 93.30% 95.40% 94.50% 95.00% - 97.70% 94.70% 94.00% 94.00% 96.10% 94.40% 93.00% 96.60% 94.50% ADA Data as of: First 100 days of instruction IEP = Students with disabilities ELL = Students who are English Language Learners FRL = Students qualifying for Free/Reduced Price Lunch Transiency, Truancy, and Discipline Transiency Discipline Transiency Rate** # of Students Habitual Disciplinary Problems Habitual Truants State 26.70% 156 1,900 Clark 28.90% - 902 24.00% 0 - Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 3 of 7

Violence to Students Violence to Staff Weapons # of (Suspensions or Expulsions) Dist. Controlled Substances Possession/ Use Controlled Substances Possession/ Use of Alcohol State 5,588 274 440 86 1,248 271 Clark 3,781 178 264 25 537 73 50 0 1 0 2 0 Reported # of Bullying # of Cyber Bullying Determined to be so after an Investigation Suspension/ Expulsion Reported Determined to be so after an Investigation Suspension/ Expulsion State 3,754 3,189 725 544 532 208 Clark 2,286 2,284 391 476 476 180 10 10 5 26 26 15 Data as of: End of school year Discipline and Transiency incidents are reported at the school where the action occurred. **The purpose of some alternative programs is to enroll students for a short period of time until they can reenroll in a comprehensive school; therefore, transiency rates may be greater than 100% or N/A. Data reported as of the end of the school year. Retention K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % State 655 1.90% 1,027 2.80% 480 1.40% 296 0.90% 133 0.40% 71 0.20% 355 1.00% 510 1.50% 566 1.60% Clark 442 1.80% 824 3.20% 402 1.60% 250 1.00% 98 0.40% 46 0.20% 325 1.40% 453 1.90% 447 1.90% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - - - - - - Data as of: Count Day Because of the changes in law (NAC 387.659) in 2009-2010 that affected the way credit deficient students are identified, results prior to this date and post this date cannot be compared. Student/Teacher Ratio All Schools# Kindergarten++ 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade State 21:1 20:1 19:1 19:1 20:1 24:1 24:1 24:1 19:1 19:1 Clark 20:1 19:1 18:1 19:1 19:1 24:1 24:1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Data as of: December 1st "+" Teachers may serve multiple grade levels as needed. Student/Teacher Ratio is reported for the school as a whole. "++" Kindergarten ratios are based on the number of classes, not teachers. Average Class Size Average Class Size is listed for all classes where students rotate to different teachers for different subjects. English Mathematics Science Social Studies State 24 24 25 25 Clark 24 25 27 27 27 27 30 32 Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 4 of 7

Data as of: December 1st Summary of Standards-Based Test Performance Nevada uses criterion referenced tests (CRTs), Nevada Alternate Assessment (NAA) and the High School Proficiency Exam (HSPE) to measure student achievement relative to Nevada's academic standards. For grade specific assessment results and other assessment information, refer to the Nevada Report Card Website at www.nevadareportcard.com. ED = Percentage of students performing in the lowest range of achievement (Emergent/Developing) AS = Percentage of students performing in the Approaches Standards range of achievement MS = Percentage of students performing in the Meets Standards range of achievement ES = Percentage of students performing in the highest range of achievement (Exceeds Standards) K-8 Reading Writing Mathematics Science ED AS MS ES ED AS MS ES ED AS MS ES ED AS MS ES State 19% 19% 37% 25% 49% 18% 23% 10% 19% 25% 44% 13% 18% 22% 41% 20% Clark 20% 19% 36% 25% 52% 19% 20% 9% 20% 25% 42% 13% 19% 22% 40% 19% 16% 20% 37% 27% 80% 20% 0% 0% 17% 27% 48% 9% 19% 21% 44% 16% Data as of: December 1st Per-Pupil Expenditures 2012-2013 The Nevada Department of Education in consultation with In$ite adjusted the formula used to calculate per pupil expenditures beginning with the 2009-2010 Annual Reports of Accountability. Therefore, we have two appropriate comparisons sets; comparisons 2003-04 SY through 2008-09 SY and comparisons of 2009-10 SY and forward. Clark Total Cost Per Pupil = $8006 District Total Cost Per Pupil = $8274 Instruction Instruction Support Operations Leadership Total Expenditures $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % State $4,799.00 58.00% $968.00 11.70% $1,874.00 22.60% $633.00 7.60% $8,274.00 100.00% Clark $4,718.00 58.90% $894.00 11.20% $1,802.00 22.50% $591.00 7.40% $8,006.00 100.00% $3,851.00 62.80% $714.00 11.60% $1,163.00 19.00% $404.00 6.60% $6,132.00 100.00% Schools only showing up with $0 are new and data was not collected for prior year. NDE in consultation with In$ite adjusted formula used to calculate per pupil expenditures with the Annual Reports of Accountability, rendering comparisons between the year and past years data. Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 5 of 7

Personnel Information Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Highly qualified teachers hold a minimum of a bachelor's degree, are licensed to teach in the State of Nevada, and have demonstrated competence in their teaching area. Data were obtained from the Office of Teacher Licensure as of May 2014. English/ Reading/ Lang. Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies Foreign Languages Arts Elementary % % % % % % % State N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Clark N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Poverty Level Teacher Data as of: May 1st (2008-Current) (H) = High Poverty School - defined as being within the bottom quartile throughout the state of percentages of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch (L) = Low Poverty School - defined as being within the top quartile throughout the state of percentages of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch Teacher ADA and Licensure Information Average Daily Attendance Teachers Providing Instruction # Pursuant to NRS 391.125 # Pursuant to Waiver # w/ o Endorsement State 95.80% N/A N/A N/A Clark 95.90% N/A N/A N/A 95.90% N/A N/A N/A Teacher Data as of: May 1st (2008-Current) (H) = High Poverty School - defined as being within the bottom quartile throughout the state of percentages of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch (L) = Low Poverty School - defined as being within the top quartile throughout the state of percentages of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch School NSPF Results: 5 Star Rating MS Information on the ratings or rankings of schools in the Nevada School Performance Framework (NSPF) can be found via the Nevada School Performance Framework website at http://nspf.doe.nv.gov/ A 5-Star School is among the highest performing schools in Nevada in student proficiency and/or student growth on the State assessments. The school is acknowledged for its achievement with public recognition and has autonomy in school planning and decision-making. Performance Indicators Points Earned Points Eligible Growth Measure of Achievement 34 40 Status Measure of Achievement 24 30 Reduction in Achievement Gaps 18.67 20 Other Indicators 6 10 Total Index Score [Points Earned(82.67)/Points Eligible(100)] X 100 = 82.67 Note: District totals do not include state or district sponsored charter school data. Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 6 of 7

The development of this annual state accountability report is a joint effort among the Nevada Department of Education and Nevada school districts. This report is provided to the public as required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act and NRS 385.347. A comprehensive listing of all accountability data, including student test data, may be accessed on the Nevada Annual Reports of Accountability website at www.nevadareportcard.com. Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 7 of 7