Tomorrow s Engineers 2013/14 Evaluation Key Findings

Similar documents
Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

Effective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11)

Post-intervention multi-informant survey on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) on disability and inclusive education

Young Enterprise Tenner Challenge

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

Head of Maths Application Pack

What effect does science club have on pupil attitudes, engagement and attainment? Dr S.J. Nolan, The Perse School, June 2014

Science Clubs as a Vehicle to Enhance Science Teaching and Learning in Schools

Ferry Lane Primary School

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

FARLINGAYE HIGH SCHOOL

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

St Matthew s RC High School

Summary: Impact Statement

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

Assessing and Providing Evidence of Generic Skills 4 May 2016

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Teacher of Psychology and Health and Social Care

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents

Understanding student engagement and transition

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report

PART C: ENERGIZERS & TEAM-BUILDING ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT YOUTH-ADULT PARTNERSHIPS

Measuring Efficiency in English Schools, Techniques, Policy Implications and Practicalities

Simulation in Maritime Education and Training

Society of Women Engineers. SWE Spoke , Issue 4 November Winter Formal. Laurel Moses Fundraising Chair

Putnoe Primary School

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Newlands Girls School

(ALMOST?) BREAKING THE GLASS CEILING: OPEN MERIT ADMISSIONS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION IN PAKISTAN

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

SC 16 - Salt Lake City, Utah

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

Woodhouse Primary School Sports Spending

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

Department of Education and Skills. Memorandum

Jigsaw- Yellow- Red White- Grey- Orange- Brown- Gold- Blue- Green Pink

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Principal vacancies and appointments

Van Andel Education Institute Science Academy Professional Development Allegan June 2015

Developing Effective Teachers of Mathematics: Factors Contributing to Development in Mathematics Education for Primary School Teachers

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

THE ALTON SCHOOL GUIDE TO SPORT

Enhancing Students Understanding Statistics with TinkerPlots: Problem-Based Learning Approach

BENTLEY ST PAUL S C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL POLICY FOR I.C.T. Growing together in faith, love and trust, we will succeed. Date of Policy: 2013

About our academy. Joining our community

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

ANALYSIS: LABOUR MARKET SUCCESS OF VOCATIONAL AND HIGHER EDUCATION GRADUATES

HEAD OF GIRLS BOARDING

The views of Step Up to Social Work trainees: cohort 1 and cohort 2

Society of Women Engineers (SWE)

GREAT Britain: Film Brief

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

LEARN TO PROGRAM, SECOND EDITION (THE FACETS OF RUBY SERIES) BY CHRIS PINE

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Summary Report. ECVET Agent Exploration Study. Prepared by Meath Partnership February 2015

Leo de Beurs. Pukeoware School. Sabbatical Leave Term 2

Measurement. Time. Teaching for mastery in primary maths

THE USE OF WEB-BLOG TO IMPROVE THE GRADE X STUDENTS MOTIVATION IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXTS AT SMAN 3 MALANG

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report

Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

5 Early years providers

Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) and Global School Health Policy and Practices Survey (SHPPS): GSHS

Tutor Trust Secondary

Faculty and Student Perceptions of Providing Instructor Lecture Notes to Students: Match or Mismatch?

Process Evaluation Power of the Wind Pilot Project

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and

Online Versus Offline Perspectives on Gamified Learning

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

Tamil Nadu RURAL. School enrollment and out of school children. Young children in pre-school and school

HOW DO PUPILS ExPERIENCE SETTING IN PRIMARY MATHEMATICS?

Executive Summary. Lava Heights Academy. Ms. Joette Hayden, Principal 730 Spring Dr. Toquerville, UT 84774

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON THE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE STUDENTS OPINION ABOUT THE PERSPECTIVE OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND CAREER PROSPECTS

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

ERDINGTON ACADEMY PROSPECTUS 2016/17

Local authority National Indicator Map 2009

Speaking from experience: The views of the first cohort of trainees of Step Up to Social Work

Controlled vocabulary

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141 ( 2014 ) WCLTA Using Corpus Linguistics in the Development of Writing

Apprenticeships in. Teaching Support

NCEO Technical Report 27

Leisure and Tourism. Content

Using Proportions to Solve Percentage Problems I

What motivates mathematics teachers?

HEROIC IMAGINATION PROJECT. A new way of looking at heroism

School Experience Reflective Portfolio

IMPROVING STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION USING FISHBONE DIAGRAM (A

EDEXCEL FUNCTIONAL SKILLS PILOT. Maths Level 2. Chapter 7. Working with probability

CONSISTENCY OF TRAINING AND THE LEARNING EXPERIENCE

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Transcription:

Tomorrow s Engineers 2013/14 Evaluation Key Findings Prepared for EngineeringUK by Boxclever Consulting May 2015

INTRODUCTION The overarching aim of the Tomorrow s Engineers programme is to increase the pipeline of future engineers by: improving awareness about engineering and what engineers do among pupils and their teachers enthusing young people about engineering and the career opportunities available encouraging young people to make the subject choices that keep open the routes into a career in engineering The impact of programme is evaluated and, where appropriate, compared with the all UK responses identified through EngineeringUK s annual Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor (EEBM). EVALUATION OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Tomorrow s Engineers programme 2013/14 quantitative evaluation were: To determine if, as a result of taking part in the Tomorrow s Engineers programme 2013/14, students have a positive perception of engineering to ascertain the level of desirability of engineering careers to identify if and how careers materials were distributed at the events to measure the attitudes to science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) more generally. The research was designed to evaluate the activities in terms of overall perception and knowledge of engineering and attitudes towards engineering as a career amongst both young people and teachers, so that we could ascertain: the perception of engineering that young people have following the activity the level of desirability amongst young people and recommendation amongst teachers of engineering careers how attitudes towards engineering amongst young people and teachers compare with those surveyed in the EEBM the relative performance of the different activities and delivery partners amongst young people and teachers so as to identify areas of best practice and where TE staff need to support individual delivery partners to help them improve TOMORROW S ENGINEERS 2013/14 EVALUATION - KEY FINDINGS Page 1

KEY FINDINGS The desirability of a career in engineering was higher for Key Stage 3 students who had experienced Tomorrow s Engineers than those asked in the Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor (EEBM) while engineering as a career was viewed by Key Stage 1/2 and 3 pupils in a positive light. Almost half (46%) of Tomorrow s Engineers Key Stage 3 pupils thought that a career in engineering was desirable compared with 41% of those asked as part of the Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor survey. More Key Stage 3 boys viewed a career in engineering as desirable compared with girls ( vs 39%), though with a smaller gap than in the EEBM (55% vs 26%). 10 9 8 7 5 Career in engineering is desirable 55% 41% 46% 39% 26% Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor Tomorrow's Engineers Q. How desirable do you believe a career in the following areas to be? Engineering: 4 and 5 very desirable. TE Base: KS3 pupils (5292), KS3 boys (2258), KS3 girls (2592); EEBM Base: KS3 pupils (400), KS3 boys (206) KS3 girls (194) More than two thirds (68%) of Key Stage 3 pupils felt that a job in engineering would be interesting and two thirds (66%) endorsed the statement that engineering is a worthwhile profession. 10 9 8 7 5 TE activity/activities made me feel that a job in engineering would be interesting 68% 75% 64% Q. These are some things which other people have said about the impact the activity, or series of activities, has had on them. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them? - It made me feel that a job in engineering would be interesting: Agree a little / agree a lot. Base: KS3 pupils (5292), KS3 boys (2258), KS3 girls (2592) TOMORROW S ENGINEERS 2013/14 EVALUATION - KEY FINDINGS Page 2

10 9 8 7 5 TE activity/activities made me feel that engineering is a worthwhile profession 66% 73% 63% Q. These are some things which other people have said about the impact the activity, or series of activities, has had on them. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them? - It made me feel that engineering is a worthwhile profession: Agree a little / agree a lot. Base: KS3 pupils (5292), KS3 boys (2258), KS3 girls (2592) Nearly two thirds (62%) of Key Stage 1/2 pupils would like to be an engineer, including 67% of boys and 57% of girls. 10 9 8 7 5 TE activity/activities made me feel that I would like to be an engineer 67% 62% 57% KS1/2 pupils KS1/2 boys KS1/2 girls Q. Do you agree or disagree that the activity, or series of activities, made you feel? - You would like to be an engineer: Agree. Base: KS1/2 pupils (759), KS1/2 boys (365), KS1/2 girls (381) Just under half of Key Stage 1/2 and Key Stage 3 pupils have a heightened knowledge of what engineers do, as a result of attending a Tomorrow s Engineers activity. Just under half of Key Stage 1/2 (49%) and Key Stage 3 pupils (47%), said they know what engineers do ( 4 or 5 ). This means that Key Stage 3 pupils engaged in Tomorrow s Engineers activities had a better knowledge of what engineers do than those asked as part of the Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor survey (47% vs. 25%). TOMORROW S ENGINEERS 2013/14 EVALUATION - KEY FINDINGS Page 3

Know about what people working in engineering do 10 9 8 7 5 49% 5 55% 48% 47% 44% 34% 25% 16% KS1/2 pupils KS1/2 boys KS1/2 girls KS2 Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor KS3 Tomorrow's Engineers Q. How much would you say you know about what people working in the following areas do Engineering: Know a little / agree a lot. TE Base: KS1/2 pupils (759), KS1/2 boys (365), KS1/2 girls (381), KS3 pupils (5292), KS3 boys (2258), KS3 girls (2592); EEBM Base: KS3 pupils (400), KS3 boys (206) KS3 girls (194) Jobs in engineering are described as interesting, exciting and enjoyable by Key Stage 1/2 and 3 pupils who have attended a Tomorrow s Engineers activity. More than 8 in 10 Key Stage 1/2 (81%) and 7 in 10 Key Stage 3 pupils (72%) described a job in engineering as interesting. Equally encouraging is the level of endorsement for engineering jobs being seen as exciting (72% Key Stage 1/2, 57% Key Stage 3) and enjoyable (69% Key Stage 1/2, 57% Key Stage 3). Less than 1 in 10 Key Stage 1/2 (4% Boring, 3% Dull) and Key Stage 3 (9% Boring, 8% Dull) pupils would describe a job in engineering as boring or dull. Encouragingly, more Key Stage 1/2 females endorsed a job in engineering as interesting than did males (85% vs. 77%). More Key Stage 3 females, however, viewed jobs in engineering as too complicated (27% vs. 13%), too difficult (16% vs. 7%) and boring (12% vs. 6%) compared to their male counterparts. Words chosen to describe a job in engineering KS1/2 pupils KS1/2 boys KS1/2 girls Base 759 365 381 Interesting 81% 77% 85% Exciting 72% 71% 73% Fun 72% 71% 72% Enjoyable 69% 68% 7 Great 61% 62% Dirty/messy 32% 29% Too complicated 13% 12% 13% Too difficult 6% 7% 6% Boring 4% 4% 3% Dull 3% 4% 2% Q. Which of these words would you use to describe a job in engineering? TOMORROW S ENGINEERS 2013/14 EVALUATION - KEY FINDINGS Page 4

Base 5,292 2,258 2,592 Interesting 72% 76% 74% Creative 69% 72% 73% Well paid 59% 63% Enjoyable 57% 67% 54% Exciting 57% 69% 51% Rewarding 55% 62% 54% Respected 45% 49% 46% Fun 44% 53% Dynamic 33% 39% Too complicated 13% 27% Dirty/greasy/messy 18% 17% Too technical 17% 24% Too difficult 12% 7% 16% Boring 9% 6% 12% Dull 8% 6% Q. Which of these words would you use to describe a job in engineering? The majority of Key Stage 3 students rated the activities highly, with strong endorsement of knowledge of engineering roles, how to become an engineer and how engineers affect the world we live in. Through Tomorrow s Engineers activities, pupils learnt about how engineers affect the world they live in (76%) and the different jobs that engineers can do (71%). It was also encouraging that over half of pupils (56%) learnt about different ways to become an engineer. Phrase that best describes TE activity/activities Was better than a normal lesson/subject 85% Showed me how engineering affects the world we live in Liked the people who were running it Kept my attention I learnt a lot about the different jobs that engineers can do I learnt something new about science as a result of going on this activity Learnt a lot about different ways to become an engineer Was the right length Is an activity/series of activities I would recommend to a friend 76% 73% 71% 71% 64% 56% 54% 53% I did get to meet engineers 41% 5 7 8 910 Q. Which if any of these phrases best describes the activity, or series of activities, you have done? Base: KS3 pupils (5292), KS3 boys (2258), KS3 girls (2592) TOMORROW S ENGINEERS 2013/14 EVALUATION - KEY FINDINGS Page 5

Overall, both male and female pupils were very positive about the activities. Boys found them to be more enjoyable and also were more likely to view a career in engineering as desirable. For Key Stage 3 pupils, boys were a little more positive than girls in their overall rating (88% vs 84% - good or very good ). 10 9 8 7 5 Rated TE activity/activities good/very good 85% 88% 84% Q. How would you rate the activity or series of activities, you took part in? Good / very good. Base: KS3 pupils (5292), KS3 boys (2258), KS3 girls (2592) Key Stage 3 male pupils (89% vs 87% female - 4 or 5 enjoyable) also found the activities to be more enjoyable than females. The gap between Key Stage 3 gender groups finding the activities very enjoyable is narrower than we saw in 2013 (2013 male 44% female 32%, 2014 male 41% female 35%). 10 9 8 7 5 Found TE activity/activities quite enjoyable/very enjoyable 83% 89% 87% 36% 41% 35% 47% 48% 52% Quite enjoyable Very enjoyable Q. How enjoyable did you find the activity or series of activities? Quite enjoyable / very enjoyable. Base: KS3 pupils (5,292), KS3 boys (2,258), KS3 girls (2,592) TOMORROW S ENGINEERS 2013/14 EVALUATION - KEY FINDINGS Page 6

The variety of pupil selection methods used by Teachers ensured that Tomorrow s Engineers activities engaged a wide range of pupils. When selecting pupils to attend Tomorrow s Engineers activities, teachers used a wide range of methods. Most common was selection based on class or year group (69%) followed by a mix of ability (32%), suggesting that Tomorrow s Engineers activities are engaging a range of students whose enthusiasm for, and knowledge of, the subject varies considerably. How pupils were selected for TE activity/activities Class/year group 69% Mixed ability 32% Aptitude/interest in STEM subjects Other Gifted and talented pupils Pupils volunteered No particular criteria To encourage less able, those with special needs or pupils from disadvantaged background Reward for good behaviour 18% 12% 9% 8% 8% 4% 5 7 8 910 Q. How were the pupils selected for this activity or series of activities? Base: educators (1105) Tomorrow s Engineers has also engaged a wide range of Key Stage 3 pupils with 17% of schools engaged having a high proportion of students receiving free meals and 16% that have a high or very high proportion of pupils with English as a foreign language. TOMORROW S ENGINEERS 2013/14 EVALUATION - KEY FINDINGS Page 7