TIPS AND TOOLS FOR CONDUCTING CTE PROGRAM EVALUATIONS (OR: SHOW ME THE DATA!) Greg Shipp, CTE Coordinator Conroe ISD

Similar documents
ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS. Instructional Practices in Education and Training

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

PEIMS Submission 3 list

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Public School Choice DRAFT

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

Secondary English-Language Arts

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Upward Bound Program

egrant Management System Printed Copy of Application

Dual and Joint Degrees Values and Questions

School Data Profile/Analysis

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Evaluating Progress NGA Center for Best Practices STEM Summit

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Intellectual Property

State Budget Update February 2016

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

Academic Affairs Policy #1

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

MSW Application Packet

Career and Technical Education (CTE) Graduation Rates in Tennessee: A Comparative Study. A dissertation. presented to

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

UH STEM Pathways Project

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

3.7 General Education Homebound (GEH) Program

Program Integrity Regs: Clock Hour Programs. To Be or Not To Be a Clock Hour Program? NCASFAA Fall Conference. November 7-9, 2011.

Garland Independent School District Davis Elementary School Improvement Plan

Apply Texas. Tracking Student Progress

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Heritage High School Home of the Coyotes. Class of 2017 Registration for Senior Classes

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) for. Non-Educational Community-Based Support Services Program

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

KDE Comprehensive School. Improvement Plan. Harlan High School

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

AGENDA ITEM VI-E October 2005 Page 1 CHAPTER 13. FINANCIAL PLANNING

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Submission of a Doctoral Thesis as a Series of Publications

Pragmatic Use Case Writing

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

North East ISD Transition Services (NETS)

Distinguished Teacher Review

FY11 Professional Development Expenditures And Learner Pre-post Test Score Gains

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

State Parental Involvement Plan

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

Conroe Independent School District

Pharmacy Technician Program

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

SCT Banner Financial Aid Needs Analysis Training Workbook January 2005 Release 7

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

Residential Admissions Procedure Manual

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

NATIVE VILLAGE OF BARROW WORKFORCE DEVLEOPMENT DEPARTMENT HIGHER EDUCATION AND ADULT VOCATIONAL TRAINING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

Steve Miller UNC Wilmington w/assistance from Outlines by Eileen Goldgeier and Jen Palencia Shipp April 20, 2010

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

TxEIS Secondary Grade Reporting Semester 2 & EOY Checklist for txgradebook

Clock Hour Workshop. June 28, Clock Hours

Review of Student Assessment Data

The Teaching and Learning Center

PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

Welding Wisconsin Indianhead Technical College Technical Diploma Program Review and Improvement Plan

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Guide for Fieldwork Educators

Principal Survey FAQs

NC Global-Ready Schools

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

Transcription:

TIPS AND TOOLS FOR CONDUCTING CTE PROGRAM EVALUATIONS (OR: SHOW ME THE DATA!) Greg Shipp, CTE Coordinator Conroe ISD

Copyright Notice The materials are copyrighted and trademarked as the property of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of TEA, except under the following conditions: 1. Texas public school districts, charter schools, and Education Service Centers may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for the districts and schools educational use without obtaining permission from TEA. 2. Residents of the state of Texas may reproduce and use copies of the Materials and Related Materials for individual personal use only without obtaining written permission of TEA. 3. Any portion reproduced must be reproduced in its entirety and remain unedited, unaltered and unchanged in any way. 4. No monetary charge can be made for the reproduced materials or any document containing them; however, a reasonable charge to cover only the cost of reproduction and distribution may be charged. Private entities or persons located in Texas that are not Texas public school districts, Texas Education Service Centers, or Texas charter schools or any entity, whether public or private, educational or non-educational, located outside the state of Texas MUST obtain written approval from TEA and will be required to enter into a license agreement that may involve the payment of a licensing fee or a royalty. For information contact: Office of Copyrights, Trademarks, License Agreements, and Royalties, Texas Education Agency, 1701 N. Congress Ave., Austin, TX 78701-1494; phone 512-463-9270 or 512-463-9713; email: copyrights@tea.state.tx.us.

CTE Program Evaluation How will you justify current CTE Programs of Study or new Programs of Study?

Why Evaluate? Federal & State Requirements PBMAS Program Access Review (PAR) Measure Program Effectiveness Measure Student Achievement Funding Justification for POS and for Change

Annual Perkins Evaluation Program Effectiveness Report (PER) Full Compliance Review Submitted to Texas Education Agency Will be reviewed by TEA prior to any onsite CTE Compliance visit TEA will tell you that their onsite findings should match what you submitted on the PER

Program Effectiveness Report 5.The LEA has developed a comprehensive strategy for annual CTE program evaluations. 10.The LEA reviews its Perkins accountability results and uses CTE student performance data to drive goals, strategies, and continuous improvement. 11.The LEA assesses Performance-Based Monitoring (PBM) data reports and follow-up data as available to guide local application planning and improvement strategies.

Program Effectiveness Report 13.The LEA uses the local application and plan as a tool for evaluating and reporting data to assess program effectiveness. 26.The LEA uses multiple strategies, including its accountability data, to assure equal access and full participation of special populations in CTE programs. 28.The LEA evaluates data for special populations to assure that programs and services are working successfully to improve student performance.

Program Effectiveness Report 37. CTE programs are evaluated annually to determine that the size, scope, quality, and effectiveness are sufficient to meet the needs of students and be in compliance with state and federal assessment requirements. (Program Access Review)

Program Effectiveness Report 67. The LEA uses completion/graduation rates to assess academic attainment of CTE students. 68. The LEA provides opportunities, as appropriate, for student attainment of advanced end-of-program industry certifications and licensures. 69. The LEA uses follow-up data to assess CTE student participation (including placement and completion) in postsecondary education and/or work.

Program Effectiveness Report 70. The LEA complements Perkins accountability data with PBM, Program Access, and other quantitative and qualitative data to assess student performance and make informed decisions 71. The LEA evaluates demographic data from year to year, with a focus on eliminating achievement gaps.

Program Effectiveness Report 72. The LEA has implemented quality-control procedures for ascertaining the validity, reliability, and completeness of data reported to TEA. 73. The LEA reviews labor market data and workforce trends to implement programs that provide students with technical knowledge and skills essential for high-skill, high-wage, or highdemand careers. 74. The LEA uses its accountability data to implement continuous improvement activities, including promoting programs that lead to nontraditional fields.

Program Effectiveness Report 74.The LEA annually evaluates its student performance data and provides ongoing, systematic, objective evaluation of CTE programs.

Types of Evaluations Standard Program Evaluation Advisory Committee Evaluation PBMAS Data External Evaluations Facilities Review Inventory! (Beginning/Ending) Other Evaluation Sources Student Surveys/Guidance software Labor Market Information Scholarships/Awards/Income from Projects

Other Types of Evaluations Classroom Observations PDAS Student Surveys Teacher Surveys Employer Surveys Advisory Committee

MEASURE PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS How do we measure program effectiveness?

Measure Program Effectiveness AEIS Data STAAR Graduation Rate Dropout Rate Attendance Rate Nontraditional Participation Rate Student Certifications/Licenses Submitted in PER PEIMS Data Contact Hours (V1,V2, V3, etc.) Coherent Sequence Students

Verify The Data! PEIMS Review CTE Code 2 or 3 Four Year Plan Review CTE Contact Hour Review Fall/Summer 5 Year State Funding Review Enrollment Increase? Corresponding Funding Increase Unexplained Increase or Decrease Schedule Change/Block or Traditional?

Verify The Data! Review STAAR test documents to ensure appropriate CTE Code: 2 or 3 Review CTE Codes for students prior to Fall Snap Shot Submission PBMAS Data based on Code 2 or 3

Look for Trends in the Data CTE LEP STAAR CTE Sp. Ed STAAR CTE Annual Dropout rate CTE RHSP/DAP Diploma Rate CTE Graduation Rate Non Traditional Course Completion Male/Female

Look for Trends in the Data STAAR-identify the trend by Academic area Identify the CTE students who failed Identify the SE/Objectives by student Look at trend by teacher Academic and CTE Look at attendance (absences) and discipline (DAEP, ISS, OSS, etc)

Look for Trends in the Data Over representation/under representation Barriers to enrollment? Application process Who is admitted? Who is denied? Trend in the data? Teacher Approval Teacher Interview Scoring rubric that assures non discrimination Look for trends in district, campus and individual CTE programs

Look for Trends in the Data Enrollment numbers in current CTE POS or individual courses Low enrollment over time Dual Credit & ATC by POS Interest exceeding capacity over time Student interest in new POS over time License and Certification by POS Does the interest in a new program align with current workforce need? CTE Decision Making Flow Chart

Look for Trends in the Data Put a dollar amount on pre enrollment Estimate additional $$$$ for late arrival/early release by placing these students in Career Prep or Practicum with work based instructional arrangement If the Campus/District Plan is what drives success, then CTE should be included! Choose critical items, based on data and evaluation to include in the CIP/DIP

Data vs. Evaluation Forms Data allows you to identify program trends for growth & areas of concern Data allows you to identify specific student needs Data provides a path for implementing changes in programs of study Data provides the justification for equipment and software upgrades Data is dynamic and always changing

Data vs. Evaluation Forms Forms are static Forms may be completed and then filed with little or no follow up action Forms meet the minimum compliance standardsthat is all! If your programs are static, they are in decline!

Why Evaluate? Justification for CTE Programs! The need to be data driven in making decisions and recommendations Required by law Highlights strengths and weaknesses Helps build business/community partnerships

Where Do I Find CTE Resources? TEA Performance Based Monitoring http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/pmi/ctemon/ Perkins Program Effectiveness Report http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=3367

Questions? For assistance, contact your Region Education Service Center CTE Specialist: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=4881 Greg Shipp, Administrative Coordinator for Career & Technical Education Conroe ISD gshipp@conroeisd.net 936.709.7821