Community College Survey of. Student Engagement (CCSSE) Presented by the Office of Institutional Research

Similar documents
National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

National Survey of Student Engagement

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Raw Data Files Instructions

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Best Colleges Main Survey

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

12-month Enrollment

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Shelters Elementary School


NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

University of Arizona

Educational Attainment

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

A Diverse Student Body

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2010

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

46 Children s Defense Fund

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Transportation Equity Analysis

LIM College New York, NY

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Evaluation of Teach For America:

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Cooper Upper Elementary School

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

SCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count

Van Andel Education Institute Science Academy Professional Development Allegan June 2015

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

Cuero Independent School District

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Freshman Admission Application 2016

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

Intensive English Program Southwest College

Effective practices of peer mentors in an undergraduate writing intensive course

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Introduction to Questionnaire Design

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Robert S. Unnasch, Ph.D.

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Strategic Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures

Transcription:

Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) 2017 Presented by the Office of Institutional Research The Center for Community College Student Engagement The University of Texas at Austin

Presentation Overview CCSSE Overview Student Respondent Profile CCSSE Benchmarks Special Focus Questions Other Questions CCFSSE Comparisons 2

CCSSE Overview

Please note 2017 marked the first administration of the Center s refreshed CCSSE survey instrument. As a result, CCSSE 2017 utilizes a single-year cohort (2017 CCSSE participants only) in all of it s data analyses, including the computation of benchmark scores. Daytona State College classified as a large college. Criteria: 8,000 14,999 credit students Included in this classification: 63 colleges 4

CCSSE Administration April 2017 (Spring Term) Format: Paper/Pencil Administered to: College courses On-campus classes Sample of 58 sections surveyed Randomly selected by CCSSE Result: Overall completion rate of 48% 5

Student Respondent Profile at Daytona State College

Survey Respondents In CCSSE sampling procedures, students are sampled at the classroom level. 742 respondents submitted usable surveys 1 74% overall percent of target rate 2 1 Adjusted Survey Count includes only data used in the national CCSSE analysis. See CCSSE exclusion rules for details. 2 The percent of target rate is the ratio of the adjusted number of completed surveys (surveys that were filled out properly and did not fall into any of the exclusionary categories) to the target sample size. 7

Excluded Respondents The following respondents were excluded from reporting: Respondents not indicating enrollment status Respondents marking invalid data selections Respondents under the age of 18 Respondents indicating previous survey submission Oversample respondents were also excluded. 8

Student Respondent Profile: Enrollment Status 80% 70% 60% 50% 73% 71% 40% 30% 20% 10% 27% 29% 0% Part-Time Daytona State College CCSSE 2017 Cohort Full-Time Population data are those reported for the most recent IPEDS enrollment report. 9

Student Respondent Profile: Age 80% 70% 60% 63% 70% 50% 40% 30% 32% 28% 20% 10% 0% 18-24 25+ Daytona State College CCSSE 2017 Cohort Population data are those reported for the most recent IPEDS enrollment report. 10

Student Respondent Profile: Gender Identity 60% 50% 53% 53% 40% 40% 42% 30% 20% 10% 0% Man Daytona State College Population data are those reported for the most recent IPEDS enrollment report. IPEDS does not report Other and I prefer not to respond. CCSSE 2017 Cohort Woman 11

Student Respondent Profile: Racial/Ethnic Identification Two or more Races 8% 7% White 54% 60% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0% <1% Hispanic or Latino 13% 10% Black or African American 9% 7% Asian 3% 2% American Indian or Alaska Native 1% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% CCSSE 2017 Cohort Population data are those reported for the most recent IPEDS enrollment report. Daytona State College 12

Student Respondent Profile: First-Generation Status 33% First-Generation Not First-Generation 67% Student respondents that indicate that neither parent attended at least some college are considered first generation. 13

Student Respondent Profile: College-Sponsored Activities 1 Hours spent participating in a typical 7-day week 2% 1% 1% 3% 14% 80% None 1-5 hours 6-10 hours 11-20 hours 21-30 hours More than 30 hours 1 College-sponsored activities include organizations, campus publications, student government, intramural sports, etc. 14

Student Respondent Profile: Educational Attainment 1% 2% 5% 10% 15% None GED 8% High school diploma Vocational/Technical certificate Associate degree Bachelor's degree Master's degree or higher 61% 15

Student Respondent Profile: Goals Reasons for attending this College Obtain an associate degree 85% Self-improvement/personal enjoyment 66% Transfer to a 4-year college or university 64% Obtain/update job-related skills 60% Complete a certificate program 38% Change careers Note: Students could choose more than one reason. 36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 16

Student Respondent Profile: External Commitments More than 30 hours 18% 29% 21-30 hours 4% 21% 11-20 hours 5% 16% 6-10 hours 6% 9% 1-5 hours 5% 16% None 23% 49% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Working for Pay Caring for Dependents 17

CCSSE Benchmarks Overview

CCSSE Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice The five CCSSE benchmarks 1 are: Active and Collaborative Learning Student Effort Academic Challenge Student-Faculty Interaction Support for Learners 1 Benchmarks are groups of conceptually related items that address key areas of student engagement. CCSSE s five benchmarks denote areas that educational research has shown to be important in quality educational practice. 19

CCSSE Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice CCSSE Benchmark Scores for Daytona State College 60 50 40 30 20 10 51 52.1 52.6 46.7 47.9 0 Active and Collaborative Learning Student Effort Academic Challenge Student-Faculty Interaction Support for Learners Note: Benchmark scores are standardized so the mean is always 50 and the standard deviation is 25. 20

CCSSE Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 CCSSE Benchmark Scores for Daytona State College compared to Large Colleges and CCSSE 2017 Cohort 51 52.1 52.6 49.4 50 49.9 50 49.5 50 46.7 48.8 50 47.9 49 50 Active and Collaborative Learning Student Effort Academic Challenge Student-Faculty Interaction Support for Learners Daytona State College Large Colleges CCSSE 2017 Cohort Note: Benchmark scores are standardized so the mean is always 50 and the standard deviation is 25. 21

Active and Collaborative Learning CCSSE Benchmarks

CCSSE Benchmarks for Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. 60 50 51 49.4 50 40 30 20 10 0 Daytona State College Large Colleges CCSSE 2017 Cohort Note: Benchmark scores are standardized so the mean is always 50 and the standard deviation is 25. 23

Active and Collaborative Learning During the current academic year 1, how often have you: Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.) Participated in a community-based project (servicelearning activity) as a part of a regular course 9% 52% Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 8% Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments 28% Worked with other students on projects during class 50% Made a class presentation 34% Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 62% 1 2016/17 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Answered 'Often' or 'Very Often' 24

Promote Active, Engaged Learning Students learn and retain more information and persist and succeed at higher levels when they are actively involved in learning rather than passively receiving information. Student focus group participants say active instructional approaches that encourage engaged learning, such as small-group work and student-led activities, make them more enthusiastic about their classes and more likely to attend and participate. 25

Student Effort CCSSE Benchmarks

CCSSE Benchmarks for Student Effort Indicates to what extent students are applying themselves in the learning process and engaging in activities important to their learning and success. 60 50 52.1 49.9 50 40 30 20 10 0 Daytona State College Large Colleges CCSSE 2017 Cohort Note: Benchmark scores are standardized so the mean is always 50 and the standard deviation is 25. 27

Student Effort During the current academic year 1, how often have you: Come to class without completing readings or assignments 14% 39% 47% Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources 10% 20% 70% Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in 21% 30% 49% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 1 2016/17 Answered 'Often' or 'Very Often' Sometimes Answered 'Never' 28

Student Effort During the current academic year 1 : How many hours did you spend in a typical week preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, or other activities related to your program) 2% 15% 31% 19% 21 or more 11 to 20 6 to 10 1 to 5 None 1 2016/17 33% 29

Student Effort During the current academic year 1, how often have you: Used a computer lab 19% 32% 37% Used skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 15% 16% 57% Used peer or other tutoring services 13% 17% 59% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 1 2016/17 Answered '5 or more times' Answered '2 to 4 times' Answered 'Never' 30

Student Effort Class Attendance During the current school year, how often have you skipped class? 1% 4% 58% 37% Very Often Often Sometimes Never 31

Build and Encourage Relationships Personal connections are a critical factor in student success. Focus group participants report that relationships with other students, faculty, and staff members strengthened their resolve to return to class the next day, the next month, and the next year. 32

Build and Encourage Relationships Personal connections may boost attendance and retention. Initiative on Student Success focus group participants suggest that just knowing someone else s name can make a wary student feel more comfortable. Moreover, being called by name, which eliminates the option of hiding behind anonymity, is a powerful motivator. 33

Academic Challenge CCSSE Benchmarks

CCSSE Benchmarks for Academic Challenge The nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance. 60 50 52.6 49.5 50 40 30 20 10 0 Daytona State College Large Colleges CCSSE 2017 Cohort Note: Benchmark scores are standardized so the mean is always 50 and the standard deviation is 25. 35

Academic Challenge During the current academic year 1, how much has your coursework emphasized: Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill 68% Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations 61% Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods 56% Forming a new idea or understanding from various pieces of information 72% Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory 73% 1 2016/17 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Answered 'Very much' or 'Quite a bit' 36

Academic Challenge How much does this College emphasize: Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying 4% 18% 36% Very much Quite a bit Some Very little 42% 37

Academic Challenge During the current academic year 1, how often have you: Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor s standards or expectations 10% 23% 31% Very often Often Sometimes Never 37% 1 2016/17 38

Academic Challenge During the current academic year 1 : How many papers or reports of any length have you written 27% 30% 31% 12% How many assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or packets of course readings have you read 29% 31% 37% 3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 1 2016/17 11 or more 5 to 10 1 to 4 None 39

Academic Challenge During the current academic year 1 : To what extent have your exams challenged you to do your best work Extremely Easy Moderately Easy 2% 1% Slightly Easy 7% Neither 24% Slightly Challenging 34% Moderately Challenging 22% Extremely Challenging 11% 1 2016/17 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 40

Raise Expectations Instructors should set high standards and communicate them clearly, deliberately, and consistently. Students work hard to meet instructors expectations: 60% of students often or very often work harder than they thought they could to meet an instructor s standards or expectations. 41

Raise Expectations But expectations may not be as high as they need to be: Time Spent Preparing for Class 34% Five or less hours More than five hours 66% 42

Student-Faculty Interaction CCSSE Benchmarks

CCSSE Benchmarks for Student-Faculty Interaction Daytona State College compared to Large Colleges and CCSSE 2017 Cohort 60 50 46.7 48.8 50 40 30 20 10 0 Daytona State College Large Colleges CCSSE 2017 Cohort Note: Benchmark scores are standardized so the mean is always 50 and the standard deviation is 25. 44

Student-Faculty Interaction During the current school year, how often have you: Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework 10% Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance 61% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class 19% Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor 28% Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor 48% Used e-mail to communicate with an instructor 58% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Answered 'Often' or 'Very Often' 45

Student-Faculty Interaction Student Perceptions of Feedback During the current school year 1, how often have you received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance? 8% 28% 31% Very Often Often Sometimes Never 1 2016/17 34% 46

Ensure that Students Know Where They Stand Feedback on academic performance greatly affects student retention. Some community college students may need help understanding where they stand and how to use feedback productively. In focus groups, students frequently report that they were unaware of their poor academic standing in a particular course until it was too late to salvage their grade. 47

Support for Learners CCSSE Benchmarks

CCSSE Benchmarks for Support for Learners Daytona State College compared to Large Colleges and CCSSE 2017 Cohort 60 50 47.9 49 50 40 30 20 10 0 Daytona State College Large Colleges CCSSE 2017 Cohort Note: Benchmark scores are standardized so the mean is always 50 and the standard deviation is 25. 49

Support for Learners How much does this College emphasize: Providing the financial support you need to afford your education 50% Providing the support you need to thrive socially 29% Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) 23% Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds 51% Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this College 77% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Answered 'Very much' or 'Quite a bit' 50

Support for Learners During the current academic year 1, how often have you: 73% Used career counseling services 3% 9% 15% Used academic advising/planning services 12% 16% 23% 49% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Never 1 time 2 to 4 times 5 or more times 1 2016/17 51

Integrate Student Support into Learning Experiences Students are most likely to succeed when expectations are high and they receive the support they need to rise to those expectations. 52

Integrate Student Support into Learning Experiences Community colleges offer a wide variety of support services, but students cannot use services if they are unaware of them. In addition, students don t take advantage of services when they don t know how to access them, find them to be inconvenient, or feel stigmatized by using them. 53

2017 Special Focus Academic Advising and Planning

Special Focus: Academic Advising and Planning Since your first academic term 1 at this College, have you met (in person or online) with an academic advisor before registering for classes each term? 14% Yes, before every academic term 33% 54% Yes, before some academic terms, but not all No 1 Spring 2017 55

Special Focus: Academic Advising and Planning Prior to registering for classes before this academic term 1 at this College, were you required to meet (in person or online) with an academic advisor? 49% 51% Yes No 1 Spring 2017 56

Special Focus: Academic Advising and Planning During this academic term 1 at this College, how many times have you met (in person or online) with an academic advisor? 25% 24% More than twice Twice Once None 27% 24% 1 Spring 2017 57

Special Focus: Academic Advising and Planning During this academic term 1 at this College, if you have met (in person or online) with an academic advisor more than once, did you meet with the same academic advisor each time? 17% 24% Yes No 18% I have only met with an academic advisor once this academic term at this College I have not met with an academic advisor once this academic term at this College 1 Spring 2017 41% 58

Special Focus: Academic Advising and Planning During your most recent meeting (in person or online) with an academic advisor during this academic term 1 at this College, he or she discussed when your next advising session should be. 19% 17% Yes No I have not met with an academic advisor during this academic term at this College 65% 1 Spring 2017 59

Other Questions

Other Questions Memorization vs. Deep Learning During the current academic year 1, how much of your coursework at this College emphasized the following mental activities? Memorization Deep Learning Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Forming a new idea or understanding from various pieces of information 68% 73% 72% Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods 56% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 1 2016/17 Percentage of students responding quite a bit or very much 61

Other Questions Which of the following have you done while attending this College? Honors course 7% 93% Developmental/remedial math course (also referred to as Basic Skills, College Prep, etc.) 25% 75% Developmental/remedial writing course (also referred to as Basic Skills, College Prep, etc.) Developmental/remedial reading course (also referred to as Basic Skills, College Prep, etc.) An English course taught specifically for students whose first language is not English (ESL, ESOL) Internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment 11% 10% 4% 20% 89% 90% 97% 80% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Have done Not done 62

Other Questions How much has your experience at this College contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? Thinking critically and analytically Learning effectively on your own 72% 71% Working effectively with others Writing clearly and effectively Solving numerical problems Speaking clearly and effectively Developing career goals 64% 63% 59% 57% 54% Gaining information about career opportunities Acquiring job- or work-related knowledge and skills 44% 43% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Answered 'Very much' or 'Quite a bit' 63

Other Questions Barriers to Returning to College How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class or from this College? Lack of finances 50% Working full-time 39% Caring for dependents 26% Academically unprepared 19% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Very Likely or Likely 64

Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE) 2017 Presented by the Office of Institutional Research The Center for Community College Student Engagement The University of Texas at Austin

CCFSSE Overview Faculty survey about their teaching practices, the ways they spend their professional time both in and out of class, and their perceptions regarding students educational experiences.

Active and Collaborative Learning How often do students in your selected course section do the following? Answered Often or Very Often Participated in a community-based project (servicelearning activity) as a part of a regular course) 12% 9% Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare assignments 28% 39% Worked with other students on projects during class 50% 63% Made a class presentation 29% 34% Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 62% 81% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Source: 2017 CCFSSE data Faculty Student 67

Student Effort How often do students in your selected course section do the following? Answered Often or Very Often Students who skipped class 5% 16% Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations 59% 60% Come to class without completing readings or assignments 14% 39% Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources 51% 70% Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in 24% 49% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Source: 2017 CCFSSE data Faculty Student 68

Academic Challenge How much does the coursework in your selected course section do the following? Answered Quite a bit or Very much Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill 71% 68% Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations 61% 73% Making judgements about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods 56% 69% Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory 80% 73% Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods so the students can repeat them in pretty much the same form 42% 68% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Source: 2017 CCFSSE data Faculty Student 69

Student-Faculty Interaction How often do students in your selected course section do the following? Answered Often or Very Often Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework 12% 10% Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance 61% 91% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class 19% 34% Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor 28% 44% Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor 48% 77% Used e-mail to communicate with an instructor 58% 78% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Source: 2017 CCFSSE data Faculty Student 70

Support for Learners Faculty frequency of referrals vs. Student frequency of use Services for active military and veterans 3% 10% Services for students with disabilities 3% 10% Library resources and services 27% 32% Transfer advising/planning 3% 8% Student organizations 6% 10% Computer labs 32% 36% Financial aid advising 13% 17% Child care 1% 2% Skills labs (writing, math, etc.) 15% 46% Peer or other tutoring 13% 47% Job placement assistance 1% 5% Career counseling 3% 10% Academic advising/planning 16% 26% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Source: 2017 CCFSSE data Faculty answered 'Often' Student answered '5 or more times' 71

Closing Remarks and Questions