Table 1: Number of Students Taking Placement Tests by Subject, March-September

Similar documents
NCEO Technical Report 27

Accuplacer Implementation Report Submitted by: Randy Brown, Ph.D. Director Office of Institutional Research Gavilan College May 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

B.S/M.A in Mathematics

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

Mathematics. Mathematics

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Educational Attainment

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Idaho Public Schools

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

AB 167/216 Graduation. kids-alliance.org/programs/education. Alliance for Children s Rights

College Entrance Testing:

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Intermediate Algebra

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Proficiency Illusion

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Fall Semester Year 1: 15 hours

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Bachelor of Science. Undergraduate Program. Department of Physics

Principal vacancies and appointments

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

Montana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

Junior Scheduling Assembly. February 22, 2017

West Haven School District English Language Learners Program

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

ADULT BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Environmental Science BA

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. Eliminate Rule Instruction

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

EDINA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Registration Class of 2020

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

1. Conclusion: Supply and Demand Analysis by Primary Positions

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

TRANSFER ARTICULATION AGREEMENT between DOMINICAN COLLEGE and BERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE

GUIDE TO THE CUNY ASSESSMENT TESTS

School of Engineering Foothill College Transfer Guide

Course Offerings SUBJECT AND COURSE REQUIREMENTS

Master Plan for English Learners

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

INTRODUCTION ( MCPS HS Course Bulletin)

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

PROGRAM REVIEW CALCULUS TRACK MATH COURSES (MATH 170, 180, 190, 191, 210, 220, 270) May 1st, 2012

CHAPTER 5: COMPARABILITY OF WRITTEN QUESTIONNAIRE DATA AND INTERVIEW DATA

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

Mathematics subject curriculum

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM and the INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Status of Latino Education in Massachusetts: A Report

AP Calculus AB. Nevada Academic Standards that are assessable at the local level only.

Course Description Guide. Table of Contents

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

El Camino College Planning Model

TESTING. Who Must Take the TSI Assessment Exam? Who Does Not Have to Take the TSI Assessment Exam? When Must a Student Take the TSI Assessment Exam?

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

HISTORY 108: United States History: The American Indian Experience Course Syllabus, Spring 2016 Section 2384

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Best Colleges Main Survey

Financing Education In Minnesota

Report on Academic Recruitment, Hiring, and Attrition

Pathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

EGRHS Course Fair. Science & Math AP & IB Courses

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

Western Australia s General Practice Workforce Analysis Update

Access Center Assessment Report

ADVANCED PLACEMENT STUDENTS IN COLLEGE: AN INVESTIGATION OF COURSE GRADES AT 21 COLLEGES. Rick Morgan Len Ramist

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

Assessment and Evaluation for Student Performance Improvement. I. Evaluation of Instructional Programs for Performance Improvement

Call Center Assessment-Technical Support (CCA-Technical Support)

African American Male Achievement Update

Is Open Access Community College a Bad Idea?

Transcription:

El Camino College Assessment Test Results New Students from High School, Fall 2006 to Fall 2010 This report displays course placement rates for new high school graduate-aged students entering El Camino College (ECC) over 5 years. Because graduation date information is not complete and new students to El Camino College can be of any age, the direct from high school cohort is approximated as students aged 17 or 18 with a recent test score. The report includes results for these fall-enrolled students who represent about half of all examinees who enroll in fall. Assessment tests are offered in 5 subjects at ECC: Chemistry, Mathematics, Reading, Writing and English as a Second Language (ESL). The Math test consists of 3 different levels: Arithmetic, Elementary Algebra and College-Level Math. Students are diverted to different levels of the math test depending on early pre-test questions and on performance following a computer-adaptive model. The Chemistry Test (California Chemistry Diagnostic Test) is a paper and pencil test that is used to place students into the appropriate transfer-level chemistry course, provided they also meet a math prerequisite. The ESL assessment places students into listening/speaking, reading and writing courses. Table 1 highlights the number of students, regardless of age, taking each test between March 1 and the September census date of each year listed. Students repeating the same test are counted only once. These test counts typically mirror fluctuations in college enrollment. The number of tests transitioned from a low point in 2006 to climb to a 5-year high in 2010, due to dramatic enrollment growth at both the Torrance campus and Compton Center. Table 1 includes all tests administered at both ECC and Compton Center, but tested students enrolled (last row) represent only those enrolled at the main Torrance campus. Note that while individual test administrations rose, the number of unduplicated students tested (and students ultimately enrolling at ECC) declined, perhaps due to a reduction in related course sections. Fall 2010 showed a continued rise in the rate of transfer-level and college-prep placements. This may be due to the increase in CSU/UC-prepared students who were diverted to El Camino College by enrollment constraints at our California universities. Table 1: Number of Students Taking Placement Tests by Subject, March-September Test Subject Number of Students Taking Each Test or Level * 2006 2007 2008 2009** 2010 Arithmetic Math 4,671 5,629 6,326 6,593 6,883 Algebra Math 6,621 7,707 8,684 9,242 9,635 College-level Math Math 1,688 1,872 2,061 2,289 2,380 Reading Comprehension Reading 6,514 7,706 8,506 9,219 9,489 Sentence Skills Writing 6,516 7,703 8,491 9,196 9,481 Chemistry Chemistry 88 88 113 98 92 English as a Second Language ESL 586 374 575 259 547 Total Tests (duplicated) 26,686 31,079 36,764 38,905 40,517 Students Tested (unduplicated) 8,162 9,556 10,532 11,196 11,164 Tested Students Enrolled in Fall 5,084 5,349 6,536 5,389 4,851 * Repeats of the same test by the same student have been excluded. ** Slight changes in cut scores within the college-prep and basic skills math categories in Fall 2009 ECC Institutional Research 1 6/16/2011

Results The Reading, Writing and Mathematics tests place students in a variety of levels depending on test performance. For this study, placements are grouped into categories of similarly-leveled courses. These groups are 1) transfer-level courses that are equivalent to courses at a 4-year institution, 2) college-preparatory courses that immediately precede transfer-level courses, and 3) basic skills courses defined by El Camino College as basic skills courses (in most cases, more than one level below transfer). The specific ECC courses within each group and their levels below transfer level are listed in the appendix of this report. Placement results for the 5 years in this study are summarized in Table 2 by number and percentage in each subject and course group. Charts tracking the placement percentages of each begin on page 3. Table 2: Assessment Test Results by Test and Course Group* for New Freshmen 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Test (n=2,800) (n=2,879) (n=3,215) (n=2,970) (n=2,629) N % N % N % N % N % Reading** Transfer-level 979 36.5 1,085 39.5 1,215 40.0 1,281 45.9 1,220 49.2 College-prep 634 23.7 640 23.3 700 23.1 637 22.8 543 21.9 Basic Skills 1,066 39.8 1,024 37.2 1,121 36.9 871 31.2 719 29.0 Total 2,679 2,749 3,036 2,789 2,482 Writing** Transfer-level 942 35.1 896 32.5 975 32.1 1,061 38.0 987 39.8 College-prep 1,279 47.7 1,433 52.0 1,587 52.2 1,357 48.7 1,208 48.7 Basic Skills 459 17.1 425 15.4 476 15.7 371 13.3 287 11.6 Total 2,680 2,754 3,038 2,789 2,482 Math Transfer-level 235 8.9 213 7.9 272 8.9 269 9.8 253 10.1 College-prep 1,422 53.6 1,502 55.8 1,705 55.7 1,540 56.4 1,481 59.0 Basic Skills 997 37.6 976 36.3 1,084 35.4 923 33.8 777 30.9 Total 2,654 2,691 3,061 2,732 2,511 Note: The N figures at the top represent the total number of students aged 17 or 18 who took assessment tests between March 1 and the September census date in the year noted. * Specific courses under each Course Group are listed in the Appendix of this report. ** Transfer-level placements for Reading and Writing reflect only that portion of the test, and thus, general preparation in reading and writing only. To qualify for enrollment in English 1A, examinees must achieve a qualifying score on both the Reading and Writing portions of the assessment test (see page 4). ECC Institutional Research 2 6/16/2011

Reading Placements into reading courses were variable over the past 5 years. Placements into the transferable level (English 1A) have steadily increased in the past 2 years. Overall, 2010 placements increased by nearly 10% from 2006. The 5-year average percentage of 17-18 year old students placing at the transfer level for the period was 42%. College preparatory placements have remained level for 3 years following a 2-year increase. The placement rate into college-prep courses (English 84 or 7) is about 22%. The percentage of basic skills placements have decreased over the past 2 years after a recent plateau. This decrease corresponds with the increase of students placing into the transferable level. Beginning in Fall 2007, this category now consists of 2 basic skills courses (English 82 and English 80). About 3% of students place at the English 80 level, down from 5% in the first year. No adjustment was made to the English 82 placement cut score. The 5-year average placement rate into basic skills reading courses was about 35%. Reading Test Placements by Course Group New Students From High School Fall 2006 - Fall 2010 70.0 Percent Placing into Category 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 45.9 49.2 39.8 39.5 40.0 36.5 37.2 36.9 31.2 29.0 23.7 23.3 23.1 22.8 21.9 FA 06 FA 07 FA 08 FA 09 FA 10 Term Transfer Level College Prep Basic Skills Writing Transfer-level (English 1A) course placements increased within the last two years, following a recent 2-year decline of nearly 3 percentage points. Placements into college-prep (English A) have also stabilized after a 5-point climb over three years. The placement rate into the basic skills course (English B) declined by 2 percentage points, contributing to the gradual decline in basic skills placements. Over the past 5 years, basic skills placements declined about 6 points. ECC Institutional Research 3 6/16/2011

Five-year average placements into transfer-level, college-prep and basic skills writing courses were 35%, 50% and 15%, respectively. Writing Test Placements by Course Group New Students From High School Fall 2006 - Fall 2010 Percent Placing into Course Group 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 52.0 52.2 47.7 48.7 48.7 35.1 38.0 39.8 32.5 32.1 17.1 15.4 15.7 13.3 11.6 FA 06 FA 07 FA 08 FA 09 FA 10 Term Transfer Level College Prep Basic Skills English 1A To qualify for English 1A (transfer-level reading and writing), examinees must past both the Reading and the Writing portions of the assessment test. The two tables above reflected placement rates into the transfer-level course (English 1A) based only on one of these two criteria in order to show academic preparation by subject. The table below reflects actual course placement rates using both the reading and writing qualifying test scores. Placement rates fluctuated by as much as 4 percentage points over 5 years, with rates stabilizing over the past 2 year. The 5-year average was 28%. Placements into English 1A New Students from High School Percent in 1A 40.0 30.0 20.0 31.0 31.0 26.8 27.1 26.1 FA 06 FA 07 FA 08 FA 09 FA 10 Term ECC Institutional Research 4 6/16/2011

Mathematics Placements into the transfer level courses remained stable for the last 5 years, but increased slightly in 2010. Average rates are around 9% (see Appendix for a complete list of these courses.). Over the 5 years of the study, math experienced an overall increase in placements into the middle category, representing college-preparatory algebra and geometry with a corresponding decline in placements into basic skills courses (pre-algebra, arithmetic). College-prep placements climbed (and basic skills declined) over 5 points during the period. Average placement rates into collegeprep and basic skills math courses were 56% and 35%, respectively. Math Test Placements by Course Group New Students From High School Fall 2006 - Fall 2010 Percent Placing into Category 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 55.8 59.0 56.4 55.7 53.6 37.6 36.3 35.4 33.8 30.9 8.9 7.9 8.9 9.8 10.1 FA 06 FA 07 FA 08 FA 09 FA 10 Term Transfer Level College Prep Basic Skills Note: New cut scores affected some basic skills and college prep courses beginning in Fall 2009. Chemistry Test Results The Chemistry placement test is a written test offered only one time to students. In other words, students cannot retake this test as with other placement tests. The test measures students knowledge of basic chemistry, including laboratory skills and mathematics. Not all students are required to take this placement test. Only students interested in enrolling in Chemistry 1A (General Chemistry I) must take the Chemistry placement test, unless they successfully completed Chemistry 4 (Beginning Chemistry) in the past. Results for the Chemistry placement tests are outlined in Table 3. In general, more students place into the higher course, Chemistry 1A (61%-64%), although recent years show that placements are lower than in the high year of Fall 2007 (79%). Average percentage placement during this 5-year period for Chemistry 1A and Chemistry 4 were 65% and 35%, respectively. ECC Institutional Research 5 6/16/2011

Table 3: Assessment Test Results by Chemistry Course Chemistry Results El Camino College Entering Fall Cohort 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 (n=2,800) (n=2,879) (n=3,215) (n=2,970) (n=2,629) N % N % N % N % N % Chemistry 1A 7 53.8 19 79.2 23 63.9 21 63.6 20 60.6 Chemistry 4 6 46.2 5 20.8 13 36.1 12 36.4 13 39.4 Total 13 24 36 33 33 English as a Second Language Test Results The English as a Second Language (ESL) assessment consists of a computerized reading skills test, a questionnaire, an English writing sample, an oral interview, and an orientation to the College. A very small percentage of students aged 17-18 (<=3%) take the ESL test. The comprehensive ESL assessment places students into Listening/Speaking (Oral), Reading and Writing courses. These courses are listed by level in the Appendix. A 5-year trend of placement results is found in Table 4 below. In 2010, oral placements returned to a previous high of 93% with a low point found in 2007. In contrast, reading showed a 4-point increase in college-prep placements with a 5-year high of 85% in 2008. Writing placements declined over 5 years, especially following a high of 86% last year. In recent years, younger students placing into basic skills ESL courses range from 7%-14% for oral, 15%-26% for reading and 12-27% for writing. Table 4: Assessment Test Results by ESL Test Category and Course Group 2006 2007 2008 2009* 2010 ESL Section (n=2,800) (n=2,879) (n=3,215) (n=2,970) (n=2,629) N % N % N % N % N % Oral College-prep 58 93.5 72 85.7 73 89.0 58 92.1 68 93.2 Basic Skills 4 6.5 12 14.3 9 11.0 5 7.9 5 6.8 Total 62 84 82 63 73 Reading College-prep 48 77.4 67 80.7 72 84.7 52 81.3 69 81.2 Basic Skills 14 22.6 16 19.3 13 15.3 12 18.8 16 18.8 Total 62 83 85 64 85 Writing Transfer-level 1 1.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.5 4 5.0 College-prep 46 74.2 61 73.5 62 72.9 56 86.2 58 72.5 Basic Skills 15 24.2 22 26.5 23 27.1 8 12.3 18 22.5 Total 62 83 85 65 80 ECC Institutional Research 6 6/16/2011

Retesting Patterns Examinees are permitted to repeat each of the computer-adaptive placement tests once if they are not satisfied with their placement and have not enrolled into nor completed any Reading, Writing or Math courses. Permission to take the placement test more than twice is granted by exception of the Dean. Between 9% and 14% of examinees by subject elected to repeat a test in 2010 (at both locations). One percent or fewer received special permission to take a test more than twice. Table 5: Number of Students Re-taking Placement Tests by Subject Number of Students by Attempt Total Tests Test 1 2 3 or more (2010) N % N % N % N % Reading Comprehension 8,224 86.7 1,221 12.9 44 0.5 9,489 100.0 Sentence Skills 8,132 85.8 1,309 13.8 40 0.4 9,481 100.0 Arithmetic 6,234 90.6 638 9.3 11 0.2 6,883 100.0 Algebra 8,590 89.2 1,026 10.6 19 0.2 9,635 100.0 College-level Math 2,016 84.7 339 14.2 25 1.1 2,380 100.0 Because a small percentage of examinees retake a placement test more than twice, Table 6 focuses on improvement in test scores between only the first and second administration. For the five placement tests, the average test score increased by 6 to 8 points. Approximately 70% of students who took the Sentence Skills, Algebra and College Math placement tests twice improved their test scores. Not far behind, about two-thirds of Reading Comprehension and Arithmetic test takers increased their scores (67% and 62%, respectively). Although improving one s score is a goal when retaking a placement test, the ultimate goal is placing into a higher level. For Reading Comprehension and Sentence Skills respectively, 44% and 35% of examinees improved their placement by either 1 or 2 levels. Because the Math placement scores are intricately intertwined with each other, only an overall Math percentage of improvement is reported. For all Math subjects, 46% of examinees improved their placement by 1, 2 or 3 placement levels. Retaking the placement tests, therefore, improved over a third of students placements. Individual student preparation between tests is unknown at this time. Table 6: Average Placement Scores and Percentage of Students Who Improved on the Second Administration Test Average Score per Test % of Increased % of Improved 1 2 Scores Placements Reading Comprehension 63.9 70.4 67.3 44.4 Sentence Skills 76.4 83.1 69.6 35.4 Arithmetic 38.6 45.0 62.0 Algebra 53.9 61.4 70.3 46.1 College Math 51.0 59.0 70.4 ECC Institutional Research 7 6/16/2011

Conclusion The major finding from this study is that basic skills placement rates have lowered in Reading, Writing and Mathematics for the past 5 years. These changes are accompanied by increases in placements into transfer level courses in English and college-prep courses in Math. It is not clear why basic skills placements are declining so dramatically. A possible reason is the recent enrollment restrictions at public 4-year institutions in California which may be diverting more of our community s better-prepared students to ECC. Our own recent cuts in course offerings may also favor the more-prepared college-ready student. Another factor affecting basic skills placements may be the implementation of the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), which requires students to satisfy minimum standards in reading, writing and math. Beginning in 2006, students graduating from high school are required to achieve passing scores on the CAHSEE in order to receive a diploma (and thus qualify for financial aid in college 1 ). Therefore, fewer high school graduates are eligible for financial aid than in the past and may be deterred from considering this option. This study provided a general analysis of the El Camino College student coming directly from high school (or shortly thereafter). This group tends to perform the best on average than any other age group, so older students tend to be less well prepared for college, on average, compared to students with a recent high school experience. 1 Students may also pass the Ability to Benefit test to qualify for financial aid. ECC Institutional Research 8 6/16/2011

Appendix Courses by Group READING & WRITING Course Group Levels Below Transfer Transfer-level -- Collegepreparatory Basic Skills 1 2 3 Reading English 1A Reading & Composition English 84 (formerly Engl- 2R) Developmental Reading & Writing English 7 Speed & Power Reading English 82 (formerly Engl-R) Introduction to Reading Skills English 80 Basic Language Skills Writing English 1A Reading & Composition English A Writing the College Essay English B Introduction to the Composing Process MATHEMATICS Course Group Transfer-level Collegepreparatory Basic Skills Levels Below Course Transfer -- Math 190 Calculus -- Math 160 Business Calculus Math 180 Pre-Calculus Math 170 Trigonometry Math 150 Elem. Probability & Statistics Math 140 Finite Math -- Math 130 College Algebra Math 120 Nature of Math Math 115 Prob. & Stats for Elementary Teachers Math 110 & 111 Math for Elem. Teachers Computer Science 1, 5, 10 Math 80* Intermediate Algebra for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics 1 Math 73* Intermediate Algebra for General Education Math 60 Elementary Geometry 2 Math 40 or 41B/43* Elementary Algebra Math 41A Elementary Algebra, Part I Math 33* Extended Elementary Algebra, Part I 3 Math 25 Pre-Algebra Review Math 23 Pre-Algebra 4 Math 10A-10B/12 Basic Arithmetic Skills * Math 80 replaced Math 70 (Intermediate Algebra) in Fall 2009. It is a Calculus-track algebra course. * Math 73 was inaugurated in Fall 2009. It is a non-calculus track algebra course. * Math 33 and 43 (Extended Elementary Algebra, Parts I and II) replaced Math 41A and 41B (Elementary Algebra, Parts I and II) in Fall 2009. ECC Institutional Research 9 6/16/2011

ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE (ESL) Course Group Levels Below Transfer Transfer-level -- Collegepreparatory 1 Basic Skills 2 Oral (Listening/ Speaking) * ESL 51C (Advanced) ESL 51B (Intermediate) ESL 51A Intro to English Conversation Reading English 1AX - Reading & Composition for ESL ESL 52C (Advanced) ESL 52B (Intermediate) ESL 52A Intro to Reading and Vocab. Building Writing English 1AX - Reading & Composition for ESL English A-X Writing the College Essay ESL 53B (Intermediate) ESL 53A Elementary Grammar/Writing * Although Listening/Speaking courses indicate levels below transfer, they do not directly lead to a transfer-level course such as English 1A. ECC Institutional Research 10 6/16/2011