Staff Climate Survey. Results and Analysis. Richardson Independent School District. March 24, 2014

Similar documents
John F. Kennedy Middle School

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

12-month Enrollment

Shelters Elementary School

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Transportation Equity Analysis

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

State Parental Involvement Plan

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Best Colleges Main Survey

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

University of Arizona

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Hokulani Elementary School

El Toro Elementary School

Constant Contact Survey Results

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Organization Profile

Gifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Raw Data Files Instructions

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

School Leadership Rubrics

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Arden Middle Secondary Main Report

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Kahului Elementary School

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Denver Public Schools

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Newlands Girls School

Clark Lane Middle School

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School


Cuero Independent School District

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

A Diverse Student Body

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Data Diskette & CD ROM

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

46 Children s Defense Fund

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Garfield High School

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

User Manual. Understanding ASQ and ASQ PLUS /ASQ PLUS Express and Planning Your Study

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention programs and strategies with the greatest evidence of success

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

African American Male Achievement Update

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Transcription:

Staff Climate Survey Results and Analysis Richardson Independent School District March 24, 2014

Agenda Purpose Background Technical Notes Executive Summary of Findings Findings Strengths and Challenges Recommendations and Next Steps 2

Purpose Richardson Independent School District conducted a survey in conjunction with Vision 2020 and the District Improvement Plan to solicit feedback from campus staff regarding school climate and district initiatives. The survey inquired about: Academic Preparation School Operations District Operations School Leadership Student Support Parent Engagement Faculty Relations and Support Safety and Behavior Richardson ISD staff whose position related to the following programs were also asked to provide feedback about the program(s). The survey results were communicated in respective audit reports and are not provided herein: Advanced Academic Studies Special Education Program Dyslexia Program 3

Background In 2012-2013, RISD contracted with K12Insight (an independent, technology-based research and communications firm) to develop a survey that engaged campus staff and solicited feedback regarding critical district issues. Following the 2012-2013 Staff Climate Survey administration, Human Resources made the following recommendations which were embedded in the District Improvement Plan: 1. Debrief, review, and revise the survey to improve future administrations 2. Establish baselines for future comparison 3. Disaggregate survey data as appropriate for administrator use in district and campus planning 4

Background Recommendation: Debrief, review, and revise the survey to improve future administrations In 2013-2014, Human Resources revised the survey in response to Goal 3 Action 2 of the District Improvement Plan to better understand staff perceptions. Revisions were carefully considered so that data from 2012-2013 could be used as a baseline for comparison to 2013-2014 data. Revisions included: rephrasing or restating questions for clarity eliminating the not known option where appropriate branching questions so that participants responded only to questions relevant to their position adding questions that align with District Improvement Plan actions (e.g. Explore enhancement of employee benefits such as additional child care options Goal 3 - Action 8 ) considering other recommended revisions by K12Insight Additionally, the survey was extended to include questions as part of the Special Education, Advanced Academic Studies, and Dyslexia program evaluations. 5

Background Recommendation: Establish baselines for future comparison The 2013-2014 District Improvement Plan established goals to demonstrate improvement of employee perception in areas that fell below the district average of 86% (strongly agree or agree) on the Campus Climate Survey. Goal 3 - Objective 2 Climate Dimension Perception School Leadership 85% to 86% Faculty Relations & Support 85% to 86% Parent Engagement 84% to 86% School Operations 83% to 86% 6

Background Recommendation: Establish baselines for future comparison The 2013-2014 District Improvement Plan established goals for improved employee perception of ample implementation and support/professional development of District initiatives. Goal 1 - Objective 4 Initiative Ample Implementation Ample Support SEM 57% to 67% 47% to 57% PBL 31% to 41% 31% to 41% DI 53% to 63% 50% to 60% 7

Background Recommendation: Establish baselines for future comparison The 2013-2014 District Improvement Plan established a goal for improved campus perception of ample implementation and support of technology initiatives. Goal 1 Objective 2 Initiative Ample Implementation Ample Support Technology Integration 44% to 54% 42% to 52% 8

Background Recommendation: Establish baselines for future comparison The 2013-2014 District Improvement Plan established a goal for improved campus perception of Central Instructional Support. Goal 1 Objective 4 Initiatives Central Instructional Support 70% to 80% Ample Implementation and Support 9

Background Recommendation: Disaggregate survey data as appropriate for administrator use in district and campus planning As in previous years, Human Resources will provide each campus and department with disaggregated data to assist in developing goals for continuous improvement within each organization. 10

Technical Notes The survey was open December 10-20, 2013. Teachers, staff, and administrators were emailed unique URL survey invitations in order to participate. Questions were branched by position types so that participants were asked questions that were relevant to their position. Likert-type scales used in the survey included: Agreement Scale Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree and Don t Know Quality Scale Excellent, Good, Fair and Poor Quantity Scale Ample, Some, and No Implementation or Support Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. The findings for each item in the report exclude participants who did not answer the item or chose Not Applicable. This survey did not use a randomized sample. Responses only reflect those who took the survey. The response rate is 89%. Given the total number of respondents is 3,407 from a total population of 3,822, and using a confidence level of 95%, the confidence interval is calculated to be +.55. Findings from this survey can be stated with a relatively high degree of certainty. To ensure content validity, survey questions were jointly developed in collaboration with Dr. Fernando Medina and Patti Kieker. 11

Executive Summary of Findings A number of positive findings were identified: A relatively high percentage of invited respondents (89%) participated in the survey. 93% of respondents rated their campus as Excellent or Very Good. Climate Dimensions All climate dimensions met or exceeded 89% positive responses with most dimensions above 90%. Student Support (94%) and Parent Engagement (96%) were the highest-rated climate dimensions. Academic Preparation 94% of respondents agreed that their campus supports the District s vision, mission, and goals Student Support Overwhelmingly, respondents indicated there is an adult to whom a student can go for help with either a personal or school problem (99% and 99%, respectively). Parent Engagement and Support 98% of respondents strongly agree or agree that parents are welcomed and encouraged to attend activities at school. District Operations 98% of respondents believe that Health Services (Nurse services, health education for students and community, vision and hearing screenings, scoliosis screenings, etc. ) are Excellent or Good. 12

Executive Summary of Findings District-Wide Technology Initiative Technology Integration and Differentiated Instruction were identified to have the highest level of implementation (96% and 98%, respectively). Elementary School-Wide Enrichment Initiative 99% of respondents indicate that Elementary School-Wide Enrichment is implemented (Ample and Some). 96% of respondents indicate having support/professional development for Elementary School-Wide Enrichment (Ample and Some). Secondary Project-Based Learning Initiative 92% respondents indicate that Secondary Project-Based Learning is implemented (Ample and Some). 13

Executive Summary of Findings Four climate dimensions ranked lower than other dimensions with average positive responses of 89%. School Operations School Leadership Faculty Relations Support Safety and Behavior School Operations 80% of respondents indicated they have the technology needed to effectively integrate technology. School Leadership 83% of respondents indicated the principal or other administrators provide useful feedback about instructional practices. 87% of respondents indicated teachers and staff at school are appreciated for good work. Faculty Relations and Support 83% and 81% of respondents reported that district and campus professional development sessions, respectively, have helped them better meet students learning needs. 86% of respondents reported that staff members are treated fairly. Safety and Behavior 81% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that discipline is enforced fairly and equitably at school. 76% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that alcohol and/or drug use is not a problem at this school. 14

Participation Rate Responding Group Number of Responses (N) Max Possible Responses (Nmax) Response Rate (%) Staff 3,407 3,822 89% 15

Campus Level Is your home campus at the elementary, junior high or high school level? 25% 16% 59% Elementary Junior High High School (N=3,405) 16

Staff Member Are you a professional or paraprofessional staff member? 17% 83% Professional Paraprofessional (N=3,405) 17

Dimensions of School Climate Dimension agreement rates ranged between 89% and 96% Academic Preparation School Operations District Operations School Leadership Student Support Parent Engagement Safety and Behavior Faculty Relations and Support 91% 89% 91% 89% 94% 96% 89% 89% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Positive Responses Note₁: Not Applicable responses have been excluded from calculations. Note₂: Positive responses are defined as Strongly Agree, Agree, Excellent, and Good. 18

Overall Perception of Education Quality Please tell us what rating you would give the quality of education provided by your school. 6% 39% 54% Excellent Good Fair Poor (N=3,377) Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 19

Academic Preparation How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Our Campus Improvement Plans support the district s vision, mission and goals. (N=3,385) 44% 50% High academic standards and expectations are set for all students at this school. (N=3,387) 46% 45% 7% Learning standards and expectations are clearly explained to students at this school. (N=3,379) 43% 48% Curriculum, instruction and assessments are aligned to support student learning at this school. (N=3,375) 41% 47% 7% Helping students meet challenging academic goals is a primary focus of this school. (N=3,381) 47% 44% 6% 2014 K12 Insight 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 20

Academic Preparation How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Students at this school are learning what they need to know for success in the next grade or after graduation. (N=3,380) 38% 49% 8% Staff at this school work together to ensure student success. (N=3,382) 48% 46% Staff at this school give timely and appropriate feedback on student work. (N=3,382) 41% 50% 5% Effective implementation of instructional technology is important to student success. (N=3,373) 42% 50% 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 21

Student Support How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? There is a teacher, counselor or other staff member to whom a student can go for help with a school problem. (N=3,381) There is a teacher, counselor or other staff member to whom a student can go for help with a personal problem. (N=3,381) 71% 71% 28% 28% Students are treated fairly at school. (N=3,383) 52% 40% 6% A majority of students are excited to go to this school. (N=3,375) 43% 47% 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 22

Student Support How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? The variety of activities and courses at this school keeps students engaged in learning. (N=3,382) 47% 46% 5% Students get the school support they need for college and career planning. (N=3,380) 45% 45% Staff members are generally positive about students at this school. (N=3,380) 46% 47% 6% Teachers and staff at school believe all students can learn. (N=3,376) 52% 42% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 23

School Leadership How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? The principal and other school administrators make decisions that are in the best interest of the students. (N=3,370) 50% 41% 6% I know what the principal expects of me as a staff member at this school. (N=3,375) 57% 37% The principal and other school administrators encourage staff to be involved in making decisions for the school. (N=3,374) 44% 40% 11% The principal and other school administrators have confidence in my teaching ability. (N=3,344) 52% 36% 8% The principal and other school administrators provide useful feedback about my instructional practices. (N=3,339) 42% 41% 8% 7% The principal and other school administrators appreciate teachers and staff for good work. (N=3,345) 51% 36% 7% 2014 K12 Insight 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 24

School Leadership: Issues & Concerns Have you had to discuss an issue or concern with your principal or other school administrator this year? 50% 50% Yes No (N=3,017) 25

School Leadership: Responsiveness to Issues and Concerns When I have had an issue or concern to discuss with my principal or other school administrator... he or she was available to talk with me. (N=1,499) 63% 32% he or she was courteous and listened to my concerns. (N=1,495) 65% 30% he or she responded to my concerns in a professional manner, whether or not he or she agreed with my views. (N=1,495) 64% 29% 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Note₁: This question was answered by all professionals and paraprofessionals who had an issue or concern to discuss with their principal and/or other school administrator this year. Note₂: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 26 2014 K12 Insight

Faculty Relations and Support How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? Collaboration is encouraged among teachers and staff at this school. (N=3,315) 54% 42% District professional development sessions have helped me better meet students learning needs. (N=3,189) 32% 51% 13% Campus professional development/professional learning community (PLC) sessions have helped me better meet students learning needs. (N=2,976) 31% 50% 14% Support is available to help me incorporate computers and other technology into my instructional practices. (N=3,162) 34% 53% 9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 27

Faculty Relations and Support How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? I feel respected and supported by the principal and other administrators at this school. (N=3,323) 51% 39% 7% I feel respected and supported by other staff members at this school. (N=3,356) 50% 45% I enjoy working at this school. (N=3,324) 55% 39% 5% Campus or District Specialists (Math, Reading, Bilingual, Science, Technology) provide me with support to meet student needs. (N=2,827) 41% 47% 9% Staff members at school are treated fairly. (N=3,320) 43% 43% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 28

Parent Engagement How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? I regularly communicate with parents about their child s academic performance. (N=2,700) 42% 54% I regularly communicate with parents about their child s behavior. (N=2,772) 42% 52% 6% My school offers opportunities for parents to be involved (parent engagement activities). (N=3,249) 48% 47% 5% Parent input about student learning needs is respected and valued at this school. (N=3,232) 48% 49% Parents are welcomed and encouraged to attend activities at school. (N=3,298) 61% 37% Parents have opportunities to volunteer at school. (N=3,256) 58% 39% Parents support me when addressing their child s academic performance. (N=2,778) 41% 53% 5% Parents support me when addressing their child s behavior. (N=2,829) 37% 56% 7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 29

Safety and Behavior How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? I feel safe at school. (N=3,376) 55% 41% Students are safe at school. (N=3,373) 55% 41% Discipline is enforced fairly and equitably at school. (N=3,372) 40% 41% 13% When bullying occurs at school, it is addressed. (N=3,355) 47% 42% 5% 5% Students respect teachers at this school. (N=3,357) 29% 54% 12% I have the support I need to maintain order and discipline at this school. (N=3,354) 41% 46% 8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 30

Safety and Behavior How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? I know what is expected of me in case of an emergency. (N=3,373) 57% 41% The emergency procedures at this school are clearly communicated to staff. (N=3,374) 57% 39% The emergency procedures at this school are effective. (N=3,371) 52% 42% Alcohol and/or drug use is not a problem at this school. (N=3,372) 44% 32% 14% 5% 6% This school is a safe place from gang activity. (N=3,370) 46% 41% 6% 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 31

School Operations How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? My instructional materials are in good condition. (N=2,940) 41% 53% 5% I have the materials I need (including textbooks, visual aids, etc.) to effectively teach my classes. (N=2,886) 38% 51% 9% I have the technology I need (software and hardware) to effectively integrate technology. (N=3,065) 33% 47% 15% Students have access to reliable computers and the internet at school for learning purposes. (N=3,236) 36% 49% 12% My school is kept clean. (N=3,358) 50% 45% My school is well-maintained (air conditioning, heating, lighting, grounds, etc.). (N=3,356) 42% 48% 8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 32

Customer Satisfaction with District Operations Please rate the quality of the following services and resource materials: Central Office Instructional Support (district specialists, curriculum and instruction staff, online curriculum, pacing guides, scope and sequence) (N=3,062) 37% 46% 13% Central Office Support (Payroll, Human Resources, Insurance Services, etc.) (N=3,316) 48% 45% 5% Technology Support Services (Help desk, hardware support, technicians) (N=3,336) 48% 41% 9% Health Services (Nurse services, health education for students and community, vision and hearing screenings, scoliosis screenings, etc.) (N=3,270) 57% 41% Custodial Support (Clean facilities) (N=3,365) 52% 39% 7% Grounds and Maintenance Support (well-maintained facilities) (N=3,348) 51% 43% 5% 2014 K12 Insight 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Excellent Good Fair Poor Note: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 33

District Communication What are your preferred methods of receiving information about Richardson ISD? Method of Communication Count (N) Percentage (%) RISD Notes (RISD's emailed employee-only newsletter) 2,085 62% School Times Now (RISD's emailed community newsletter) 1,489 44% Public Website (www.risd.org) 1,469 43% Blackboard Connect (Automated telephone notification system) SMS Messaging (Text messages to your mobile phone or device) RISD Edline Intranet (Formerly RPortal, accessible by employees only) 1,234 37% 1,173 35% 1,074 32% Facebook 297 9% Twitter 107 3% I want to suggest a communications tool not currently used by the district. 19 1% Note: The sum of percentages may exceed 100% because participants could select more than one response option. 2014 K12 Insight 34

Recommendations for Retention RISD consistently explores ways to attract and retain high-performing employees. Please identify the benefits that are most likely to impact attracting and retaining employees in RISD. Benefits Count (N) Percentage (%) Increased salary or compensation 3,226 96% RISD matching contributions to 403(b) 1,865 55% Centrally located district fitness/gym facility 361 11% Bereavement leave for the death of an immediate family member 340 10% Note: The sum of percentages may exceed 100% because participants could select more than one response option. 2014 K12 Insight 35

Recommendations for Retention RISD consistently explores ways to attract and retain high-performing teachers. Please identify the benefits that are most likely to impact attracting and retaining teachers in RISD. Benefits Count (N) Percentage (%) Additional teacher compensation for employment in a school with a high population of economically disadvantaged children Additional teacher compensation for employment in critical need areas (e.g. Math, CTE) 2,051 76% 1,270 47% Childcare opportunity for child(ren) ages 0-2 728 27% Additional childcare opportunities for child(ren) ages 3-4 (currently located at Canyon Creek and Lake Highlands Elementary Schools) 476 18% Note₁: This question was answered only by teaching professionals. Note₂: The sum of percentages may exceed 100% because participants could select more than one response option. 2014 K12 Insight 36

District-Wide Program Initiatives Please indicate your school s level of implementation for each initiative. Please indicate the level of support/professional development you have received for each initiative at your school. College and Career Readiness Best Practices & 21st Century Skills (N=2,695) 63% 36% College and Career Readiness Best Practices & 21st Century Skills (N=2,655) 53% 41% 6% Differentiated Instruction (N=2,736) 66% 33% Differentiated Instruction (N=2,694) 63% 36% Professional Learning Communities (N=2,688) 65% 31% Professional Learning Communities (N=2,653) 59% 36% 5% Technology Integration (N=2,745) 55% 43% Technology Integration (N=2,712) 53% 44% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2014 K12 Insight Ample Implementation No Implementation Some Implementation Note₁: These questions were answered only by teaching professionals. Note₂: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown Ample (Sufficient) Support Some Support No Support 37

School-Wide Enrichment Initiatives Please indicate your school s level of implementation for the following initiative: 17% Please indicate the level of support/professional development you have received for each initiative at your school. 4% 32% 64% 2014 K12 Insight 83% Ample Implementation Ample (Sufficient) Support Some Implementation Some Support No Implementation No Support (N=1,583) (N=1,562) Note: These questions were answered only by teaching professionals at the elementary level. 38

Project-Based Learning Initiative Please indicate your school s level of implementation for the following initiative: 8% Please indicate the level of support/professional development you have received for each initiative at your school. 13% 39% 37% 53% 50% Ample Implementation Some Implementation No Implementation Ample (Sufficient) Support Some Support No Support 2014 K12 Insight (N=1,086) (N=1,062) Note: These questions were answered only by teaching professionals at the secondary level. 39

Online Curriculum How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? The online curriculum is well organized. (N=2,249) 30% 49% 9% 9% I am able to access the online curriculum with ease from home. (N=2,244) 36% 46% 7% 10% I am able to access the online curriculum with ease at school. (N=2,246) 40% 48% 8% The online curriculum is a valuable tool that helps me plan for instruction. (N=2,245) 38% 42% 9% 9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know Note₁: Online Curriculum Data reflects only teacher responses. Note₂: Data labels for percentages less than 5% are not shown. 40

Teaching Experience How many years of RISD teaching experience do you have? Number of Years Count (N) Percentage (%) Less than 1 year 410 12% 1 to 2 years 358 11% 3 to 5 years 508 15% 6 to 10 years 835 25% 11 to 15 years 436 13% 16 to 20 years 272 8% More than 20 years 268 8% Not Applicable 247 7% 41

Teaching Experience Other Districts Have you taught in another school district? 53% 47% Yes No (N=3,307) 42

Total Years Teaching Experience How many total years of teaching experience do you have, including your teaching experience in RISD? Number of Years Count (N) Percentage (%) Less than 1 year 16 1% 1 to 2 years 117 8% 3 to 5 years 230 15% 6 to 10 years 338 22% 11 to 15 years 274 18% 16 to 20 years 229 15% More than 20 years 313 20% Not Applicable 13 1% Note: This question was answered by all participants who had taught in another school district. 2014 K12 Insight 43

Gender What is your gender? 16% 84% Female Male (N=3,307) 44

Race/Ethnic Group Please select the race or ethnic group with which you identify. 100% 80% 72% 60% 40% 20% 0% 1% 2% American Indian or Alaska Native Asian 11% 13% Black or African American Hispanic or Latino 0% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White 2% I identify with a different race or ethnic group Note: The sum of percentages may exceed 100% because participants could select more than one response option. 2014 K12 Insight (N=3,356) 45

Strengths Most all survey-related District Improvement Plan goals were exceeded. DIP Action Plans 2012-2013 Goal 2013-2014 Increase positive responses School Leadership 85% 86% 89% Faculty Relations & Support 85% 86% 89% Parent Engagement 84% 86% 96% School Operations 83% 86% 89% Maintain participation 78% - 89% Increase - ample implementation School-Wide Enrichment Model 57% 67% 83% Differentiated Instruction 53% 63% 66% Technology Integration 44% 54% 55% Increase - ample support School-Wide Enrichment Model 47% 57% 64% Differentiated Instruction 50% 60% 63% Technology Integration 42% 52% 53% Increase - ample implementation & Support Central Instructional Support 70% 80% 83% 46

Strengths Employee survey engagement remains high and exceeds prior participation. The perception of overall Quality of Education (Excellent or Good) increased from 88% to 93%. Campus perception of Central Instructional Support increased from 70% to 83%. Campus perception of Parent Engagement Increased from 84% to 96%. The increased level of district-wide initiative implementation reflects that teachers are focusing on students by providing academic preparation, support, and enrichment experiences. The level of district-wide initiative support reflects that administration is focusing on teachers by providing professional learning opportunities. 47

Challenges Surveying all staff members every year. Project-Based Learning did not meet DIP goals. DIP Action Plans 2012-2013 Goal 2013-2014 Increase - ample implementation Project-Based Learning 31% 41% 39% Increase - ample support Project-Based Learning 31% 41% 37% Providing technology that meets all teacher s needs, preferences, and changes in technology. Assisting campus staff with discipline strategies. Branching questions appropriately to better understand the concerns regarding the online curriculum questions. 48

Next steps and recommendations - Disaggregate data for campus administrators and central staff and develop action plans at the department or campus level. - Set new district and campus goals to address concerns where improvement is needed. - Use survey data in the staff evaluation process. - Use survey data to make budget recommendations. - Revise survey questions to better understand employee perceptions. 49

K12 Insight is a technology-based research and communications firm that helps school district leadership better engage in conversations with parents, teachers, staff, students and the general public on critical district issues. K12 Insight's approach results in greater transparency and collaborative decision-making. Watch our Candid Conversations video, at http://bit.ly/12m6z4x, to learn more about how we work. 50