Unique Impact of Programs and Services on Fall 2016 Freshman Retention

Similar documents
Access Center Assessment Report

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

Evaluation of Teach For America:

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

LIM College New York, NY

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Educational Attainment

A Diverse Student Body

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Best Colleges Main Survey

Peru State College Peru, NE

Azusa Pacific University Azusa, CA

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR

Shelters Elementary School

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

46 Children s Defense Fund

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

Validation Requirements and Error Codes for Submitting Common Completion Metrics

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA

American Journal of Business Education October 2009 Volume 2, Number 7

University of Michigan - Flint Flint, MI

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Networks and the Diffusion of Cutting-Edge Teaching and Learning Knowledge in Sociology

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Swarthmore College Common Data Set

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Cooper Upper Elementary School

ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE. INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE (Excellence and Accountability)

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Sheila M. Smith is Assistant Professor, Department of Business Information Technology, College of Business, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.

Section 1 of 2. Demographics

EXPANSION PACKET Revision: 2015

Student attrition at a new generation university

American University, Washington, DC Webinar for U.S. High School Counselors with Students on F, J, & Diplomatic Visas

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Data Diskette & CD ROM

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

University of Arizona

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Communities in Schools of Virginia

Raw Data Files Instructions

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Quantitative analysis with statistics (and ponies) (Some slides, pony-based examples from Blase Ur)

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

12-month Enrollment

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

BARUCH RANKINGS: *Named Standout Institution by the

Transportation Equity Analysis

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

LaGuardia Community College Retention Committee Report June, 2006

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Predicting the Performance and Success of Construction Management Graduate Students using GRE Scores

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

Detailed course syllabus

Transcription:

Unique Impact of Programs and Services on Fall 2016 Freshman Retention Overview A multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated the unique contribution of first-year programs and services on retention outcomes after accounting for other factors that affect retention. Results provide staff, faculty, and leaders a better understanding of how freshman students benefit from their involvement in first year experiences by continuing into their sophomore year at the University of Arizona. Results indicate statistically significant support for the positive effect of participation in programs and services on freshman student retention. Data and Methodology The fall 2016 first-time full-time freshman domestic 1 student population was included in the analysis. Due to international students not having high school GPA, an important control when examining retention, they were excluded from the analysis. Furthermore, 14 domestic students who had missing high school GPA were also removed from the analysis. The remaining student population analyzed (N=5,525) experienced an 82.7% (n=4,569) retention rate. The analysis estimates the association between participation in programs and services and returning to sophomore year. Explanatory variables were selected based on well-documented relationships with first-year student retention in student success research and previous institutional assessments. Control variables are listed under Student Demographic Profile and independent variables categorized as, Academic Support, Student Engagement, and Health and Wellness (See Appendix A). Logistic regression is considered a strong statistical technique to predict the outcomes of binary variables, such as student retention (e.g. Retained vs. Did not retain). Assumptions testing was conducted with an evaluation of minimum number of observations before building the regression model. A stepwise method was then used to evaluate added explanatory variables through the Likelihood Ratio Test and Akaike s Information Criterion (AIC) to determine if variables improved model fit. This process continued until the resulting best-fitted regression model was achieved to predict student retention. Goodness-of-fit tests were also employed and demonstrate statistics supportive of an acceptable model fit. Results Results are presented using odds ratios (OR) and statistical significance levels (See Figure 1). A variable s odds ratio indicates the odds or likelihood of retention occurring given a particular program or service compared to retention occurring without that experience. Odds ratios are interpreted by magnitude in three main ways: OR < 1 Program or service indicates lower odds of retention occurring OR = 1 Program or service does not affect the odds of retention occurring OR > 1 Program or service indicates higher odds of retention occurring Figure 1: Odds Ratios of Program or Service Participation on Student Retention 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1.59* 6.68*** 5.03*** 3.23*** 1.52 1.73*** 1.23* 1.35** 1.71*** 2.11*** 1.56*** Note: *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001

Discussion Results indicate statistically significant support for the positive effect of participation in programs and services on freshman student retention. In other words, students who participated in, Academic Support, Student Engagement, and Health and Wellness programs were significantly more likely to persist to their sophomore year. For example, students who attended THINK TANK s Writing Center at least three times were 35% more likely to return to sophomore year compared to non-participants, while holding constant other variables (p <.01). The First Cats program had the highest odds of retaining to sophomore year (OR 6.68, p <.001). Campus Recreation active users (30 or more visits) were 1.56 times more likely to retain compared to non-active users while accounting for all other factors (p <.001). A complete table of logistic regression results is included in Appendix B. Source: Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013) Applied Logisitc Regression (3 rd Eds). John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ. Footnote: 1. Domestic refers to students who live in the United States before enrolling into college. 2. SALT Center includes students enrolled in the program whether or not they used available programs and services. Questions should be directed to Assessment & Research by email AssessmentResearch@email.arizona.edu or phone 520-626-2784 2

Appendix A Descriptive Statistics of Variables Variables % N Student Demographic Profile Sex Male 43% 2,389 Ethnicity African American 4% 203 Asian American 6% 346 Hispanic 24% 1,330 Native American/American Indian 1% 58 Two or more races 6% 309 White 58% 3,229 Unknown/Other/Pacific Islander 1% 50 Living Situation Lives on-campus 77% 4,271 Generation Status First-Generation 28% 1,547 Residency (base = non-resident) AZ Resident 64% 3,510 Financial Aid Merit-based Aid Recipient 76% 4,182 Pell-grant Recipient 28% 1,542 Honor s College Enrolled in Honor s College 19% 1,034 Academic Preparedness High School GPA 3.48 (average) (Bear Down Camp, New Start, UAdvantage) 5% 285 Academic Support First Cats (AY 2016-17) 3% 141 SALT (AY 2016-17) 2 2% 118 THINK TANK Supplemental Instruction (3+ sessions) 27% 1,487 THINK TANK Content Tutoring (3+ visits) 26% 1,414 THINK TANK Writing Center (3+ visits) 18% 981 Wildcat Connections Participant (10+ opens) 66% 3,638 Student Engagement Sorority Programs 12% 678 Fraternity Programs 5% 227 Blue Chip First-Year Experience 6% 339 Health and Wellness Campus Recreation Active User (30+ visits) 28% 1,530 Note: Percentages are rounded 3

Appendix B Logistic Regression Results of FTFT Domestic Freshman Student Retention Variable Odds ratio Student Demographic Profile Sex (base=female) Male 1.08 Ethnicity (base = white) African American 1.47* Asian American 1.58** Hispanic 1.09 Native American/American Indian 1.31 Two or more races 1.22 Unknown/Other/Pacific Islander 1.32 Living Situation (base = off-campus) Lives on-campus 0.79* Generation Status (base = continuing-generation) First-Generation 0.78** Residency (base = non-resident) AZ Resident 1.70*** Financial Aid (base = did not receive aid type) Merit-based Aid Recipient 1.12 Pell-grant Recipient 0.76* Honor s College (base = not honor s enrolled) Enrolled in Honor s College 2.22*** Academic Preparedness High School GPA 1.54** Programs (base = did not participate) 1.59* (Bear Down Camp, New Start, UAdvantage) Academic Support Academic Support and Initiatives (base = did not participate) First Cats (AY 2016-17) 6.68*** SALT (AY 2016-17) 2 1.52 THINK TANK Supplemental Instruction (3+ sessions) 1.73*** THINK TANK Content Tutoring (3+ visits) 1.23* THINK TANK Writing Center (3+ visits) 1.35** Wildcat Connections Participant (10+ opens) 1.71*** Student Engagement Student Engagement Programs (base = did not participate) Sorority Programs (AY 2016-17) 5.03*** Fraternity Programs (AY 2016-17) 3.23*** Blue Chip First-Year Experience (AY 2016-17) 2.11*** Health and Wellness Campus Recreation (base = 0-29 visits) Active User (30+ visits) 1.56*** Constant 0.33* Note: *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 Model Likelihood Ratio χ 2 =601.01, df =25, p < 0.0000 Diagnostic Statistics: Hosmer & Lemeshow, χ 2 = 9.57, p = 0.2964; Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.173; ROC Curve = 0.7428 4

5