Valley Community School - Los Banos

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Engage Educate Empower

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Val Verde Unified School District

Shelters Elementary School

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Kahului Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Hokulani Elementary School

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Instructional Materials Survey For Compliance With Education Code Sections 1240 (i) And Elementary School Level

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Data Diskette & CD ROM

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

African American Male Achievement Update

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

12-month Enrollment

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS SURVEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVEL RLA/ELD WORKSHEET

Deer Valley High School WASC MID CYCLE REPORT

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

University of Arizona

46 Children s Defense Fund

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

CDS Code

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

World s Best Workforce Plan

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Transportation Equity Analysis

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

California State University EAP Updates 2016

Educational Attainment

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1


Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Geographic Area - Englewood

Transcription:

Valley Community School - Los Banos California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2016-17 School Year By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. Mrs. Lori Gattuso, Principal Principal, Valley Community School - Los Banos About Our School About Our School Welcome to Valley Community School Los Banos where we STRIVE for every student to be successful in their academic and personal careers. Valley Community School provides a safe and encouraging atmosphere where staff, students, family and community members work together to create a learning environment where all participants develop a desire for personal growth and life-long learning. Our students acquire the skills, knowledge and attitudes to reach their full potential as citizens who can successfully meet the challenges of a changing global society. For more information about our school program, call (209) 827-5600. Contact Valley Community School - Los Banos 715 West H St. Los Banos, CA 93635-8540 Phone: 209-827-5620 E-mail: lgattuso@mcoe.org

About This School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) District Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) District Name Merced County Office of Education School Name Valley Community School - Los Banos Phone Number (209) 381-6600 Street 715 West H St. Superintendent Steve Tietjen City, State, Zip Los Banos, Ca, 93635-8540 E-mail Address stietjen@mcoe.org Phone Number 209-827-5620 Web Site http://www.mcoe.org Principal Mrs. Lori Gattuso, Principal E-mail Address lgattuso@mcoe.org Web Site http://www.mcoe.org County-District-School (CDS) Code 24102492430163 School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) Valley Community School was established to serve students in need of an alternative method for learning in order to be successful in school. At Valley Community School - Los Banos, we nurture and support students to ensure they are on track to becoming productive members of the community and complete their high school education. We do this by providing quality learning opportunities in a small, personalized, learning environment. While our primary goal is to return students to their school district of residence, many students choose to remain with us to complete their graduation requirements and graduate from our school. Our mission at Valley Community School is: INSPIRING STUDENT SUCCESS. Page 2 of 17

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Grade Level Number of Students Grade 9 2 Grade 10 22 Grade 11 30 Grade 12 21 Total Enrollment 75 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2016-17) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 2.7 % American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0 % Asian 0.0 % Filipino 0.0 % Hispanic or Latino 89.3 % Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 2.7 % White 2.7 % Two or More Races 2.7 % Other -0.1 % Student Group (Other) Percent of Total Enrollment Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 90.7 % English Learners 28.0 % Students with Disabilities 10.7 % Foster Youth 0.0 % Page 3 of 17

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2017-18 With Full Credential 10 5 4 30 Without Full Credential 0 0 0 0 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0 0 0 0 12 10 8 6 Teachers with Full Credential Teachers without Full Credential Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 4 2 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Last updated: 1/9/2018 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 0 0 0 1.0 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0 0.5 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0 0.0-0.5-1.0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Page 4 of 17

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2017-18) Year and month in which the data were collected: May 2017 Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Percent Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts Middle School: Literature and Language Arts - Holt, Rhinehart and Winston High School: Write Sources - Write Sources English Language Development: Edge Yes 0.0 % Mathematics Middle School: Mathematics Courses I, II and Algebra - McDougal Littell Middle School: Go Math levels for 6th, 7th, and 8th grades - Houghton Mifflin Harcourt High School: Algebra I - McDougal Littell High School: Foundations in Algebra (Algebra Readiness) - MIND Institute High School: Integrated Mathematics I and II Common Core - Pearson Yes 0.0 % Science Middle School: Focus on Life Science - Glencoe/McGraw Hill Yes 0.0 % Middle School: Focus on Physical Science - Glencoe/McGraw Hill High School: Physical Science - Globe Fearon High School: Life Science - Globe Fearon History-Social Science Middle School: Ancient Civilization, W orld Explorer and American Journey - Holt, Rhinehart and Winston Yes 0.0 % High School: World History - Pearson High School: U.S. History - Weiser Educational AGS High School: Our Economic System - Triumph and AMSCO High School: Civics for Today - Triumph and AMSCO Foreign Language N/A 0.0 % Health N/A 0.0 % Visual and Performing Arts DRAW Series - North Light Books, an imprint of F&W Publications, Inc. Yes 0.0 % Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades 9-12) Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. N/A N/A 0.0 % Last updated: 1/8/2018 Page 5 of 17

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements The facility is a safe, clean environment conducive to student learning. The sidewalk area near the lunch tables is lifting up and is creating trip hazards. School Facility Repair Status Year and month of the most recent FIT report: December 2017 System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences Rating Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Overall Facility Rate Year and month of the most recent FIT report: December 2017 Overall Rating Page 6 of 17

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAAs items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All Students CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All Students Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards School District State Subject 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 4% 8% 8% 48% 48% Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 0% 2% 2% 36% 37% Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 7 of 17

CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 31 24 77.42% -- Male 22 17 77.27% -- Female -- -- -- Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino 30 24 80.00% -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Two or More Races -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 28 21 75.00% -- English Learners -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 8 of 17

CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 31 24 77.42% -- Male 22 17 77.27% -- Female -- -- -- Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino 30 24 80.00% -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Two or More Races -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 28 21 75.00% -- English Learners -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 9 of 17

CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students Grades Five, Eight and Ten Grades Five, Eight and Ten Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced School District State Subject 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 7.0% 6.0% 14.0% 26.0% 56% 54% Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note:The 2016-17 data are not available. The California Department of Education is developing a new science assessment based on the Next Generation Science Standards for California Public Schools (CA NGSS). The new California Science Test (CAST) was piloted in spring 2017. The CST and CMA for Science will no longer be administered. Career Technical Education Programs (School Year 2016-17) Currently at Los Banos Valley, we offer Construction, Solar Technology and Health Careers. Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2016-17) Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2016-17) Measure CTE Program Participation Number of Pupils Participating in CTE 126 Percent of Pupils Completing a CTE Program and Earning a High School Diploma 0.0% Percent of CTE Courses Sequenced or Articulated Between the School and Institutions of Postsecondary Education 0.0% Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission Last updated: 1/9/2018 UC/CSU Course Measure Percent 2016-17 Pupils Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 0.0% 2015-16 Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 0.0% Page 10 of 17

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical education California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) Percentage of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Grade Level Four of Six Fitness Standards Five of Six Fitness Standards Six of Six Fitness Standards Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 11 of 17

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) Parents are a critical component of the our school culture and are welcomed to participate as a member of our School Site Council (SSC), our English Language Advisory Committee (ELAC) and to provide input into our Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP). For more information on how to be involved in your child's school, call (209) 827-5600. State Priority: Pupil Engagement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5): High school dropout rates; and High school graduation rates Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) School District State Indicator 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Dropout Rate 41.7% 21.1% 14.3% 48.2% 39.8% 36.7% 11.5% 10.7% 9.7% Graduation Rate 41.7% 68.4% 77.6% 31.3% 42.7% 47.6% 81.0% 82.3% 83.8% Dropout/Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Chart 80 70 Dropout Rate Graduation Rate 60 50 40 30 20 10 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Page 12 of 17

Completion of High School Graduation Requirements - Graduating Class of 2016 (One-Year Rate) (One-Year Rate) Student Group School District State All Students 95.7% 59.8% 87.1% Black or African American 0.0% 53.9% 79.2% American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0% 100.0% 80.2% Asian 0.0% 16.7% 94.4% Filipino 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% Hispanic or Latino 100.0% 63.2% 84.6% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0% 50.0% 86.6% White 100.0% 55.9% 91.0% Two or More Races 0.0% 50.0% 90.6% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 93.2% 54.2% 85.5% English Learners 84.6% 47.9% 55.4% Students with Disabilities 0.0% 9.5% 63.9% Foster Youth 50.0% 100.0% 68.2% Page 13 of 17

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions School District State Rate 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Suspensions 39.0% 42.3% 34.8% 16.5% 14.9% 13.2% 3.8% 3.7% 3.7% Expulsions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% Suspensions Expulsions 45 40 School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions 0.12 0.10 School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions 35 30 0.08 25 0.06 20 15 0.04 10 0.02 5 0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 0.00 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 School Safety Plan (School Year 2017-18) Our School Safety Plan is reviewed and updated yearly by a committee that includes community members, school staff and parents. If you would like to be part of our School Safety Plan Committee, call (209) 827-5600. Page 14 of 17

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Indicator School District Program Improvement Status Not in PI In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2005-2006 Year in Program Improvement Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 2 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 50.0% Page 15 of 17

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Subject Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ English 23.0 2 7 0 9.0 10 0 0 17.0 5 1 0 Mathematics 21.0 2 4 0 13.0 6 0 0 15.0 6 0 0 Science 22.0 1 4 0 12.0 6 0 0 18.0 4 1 0 Social Science 22.0 2 5 0 12.0 11 0 0 16.0 5 1 0 * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2016-17) Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor Academic Counselor 0.8 150.0 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) Library Media Teacher (Librarian) Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) N/A N/A N/A Psychologist 0.1 N/A Social Worker N/A Nurse 0.2 N/A Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist N/A Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 1.0 N/A Other 1.0 N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. *One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary School Site $26732.0 $26710.0 $22.0 $70714.0 District N/A N/A $36050.0 $71326.0 Percent Difference School Site and District N/A N/A -199.8% -0.9% State N/A N/A $6574.0 $69964.0 Percent Difference School Site and State N/A N/A -198.7% 200.0% Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Last updated: 1/8/2018 Page 16 of 17

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) Valley Los Banos provides two Bilingual Instructional Aides that help students needing additional academic support. The school counselor is available to meet with students regarding their academic progress. We also provide students with a Student Advocate that can provide emotional and social support as needed. Professional Development Certificated staff are provided three full days of professional development focusing on instructional strategies and the school's restorative justice program, STRIVE. In addition, certificated staff are provided a 2-hour professional development session twice a month focusing on Common Core State Standards, instructional strategies and restorative justice practices. Certificated staff are provided three full days of professional development focusing on instructional strategies and improving the school culture. In addition, certificated staff are provided a 2-hour professional development session weekly focusing on a wide range of classroom instructional strategies. Page 17 of 17