AdvancED Glossary. Advance Education, Inc.

Similar documents
STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

School Leadership Rubrics

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

PROJECT RELEASE: Towards achieving Self REgulated LEArning as a core in teachers' In-SErvice training in Cyprus

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

NC Global-Ready Schools

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

EQuIP Review Feedback

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Modified Systematic Approach to Answering Questions J A M I L A H A L S A I D A N, M S C.

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Supplemental Focus Guide

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

The 21st Century Principal

Introduction. 1. Evidence-informed teaching Prelude

EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster

What does Quality Look Like?

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL. How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Indiana Last Updated: October 2011

University of Toronto

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Advancing the Discipline of Leadership Studies. What is an Academic Discipline?

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

Job Description: PYP Co-ordinator

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Nevada Last Updated: October 2011

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

Harvesting the Wisdom of Coalitions

Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

MGMT 479 (Hybrid) Strategic Management

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Coaching Others for Top Performance 16 Hour Workshop

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

K-12 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Assessment and national report of Poland on the existing training provisions of professionals in the Healthcare Waste Management industry REPORT: III

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

Assessment and Evaluation

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

VIA ACTION. A Primer for I/O Psychologists. Robert B. Kaiser

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Transcription:

accreditation A voluntary method of quality assurance developed more than 100 years ago by American universities and secondary schools, and designed primarily to distinguish institutions adhering to a set of educational standards and policies Accreditation Progress Report A formal written detailed account of the institution s progress in addressing the Improvement Priorities from the Engagement Review Team accreditation status A designation provided by AdvancED that helps further define the institution s standing relative to the results of an institution s Engagement Review active engagement, actively engaged AdvancED Continuous Improvement System AdvancED Performance Standards best practices clearly communicated Learning that allows students to generate knowledge or make meaning via such behaviors as clarifying, asking questions, comparing, and applying new information A research-based, on-going process in which institutions engage for the purpose of increasing its overall effectiveness and making positive, measurable impact on all stakeholders, primarily students, by focusing on and implementing three essential elements: learn and share, examine and plan, and act and evaluate. Research-based statements that describe conditions necessary for institutions to support organizational effectiveness and improve student performance Classroom instructional and organizational strategies that have been demonstrated and accepted by the professional community to be effective in improving student learning and overall organizational effectiveness Information disseminated to stakeholders using a method and format(s) that is coherent and appropriate to specific stakeholder groups Diagnostic: Efficacy of Engagement eleot Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain - 1.5 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.6 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.10

climate The quality and character of a school or institution that is Climate and Culture Survey reflective of its norms, goals, values, relationships, practices, and structures. The climate of an institution is typically subjective whereas the culture of the school refers to the actual state or condition of the institution. coaching (program) A formal and informal structure for staff members to Standard: Resource Capacity Domain - 3.3 examine and reflect about instructional practices for the purpose of improving student learning and student results comprehensive system A process whereby the institution has established Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain - 1.10 strategies for data collection, analysis, and dissemination from multiple measures and/or sources that act to inform an institution s decisions community or community representatives People who have an affiliation with and interest in the institution s success, such as representatives from businesses, civic organizations, universities, etc. Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain - 1.8 Diagnostic contextually based research Information gathered from local data sources and analyzed to inform programmatic decisions at the local level Standards: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.12 culture domain Generally refers to the beliefs, perceptions, relationships, attitudes, and written and unwritten rules that shape and influence every aspect of how an institution operates Organizational superstructure for aligning AdvancED Performance Standards. Each domain is defined by a statement describing a broad concept related to an organization or institution. AdvancED defines three domains: Leadership Capacity, Learning Capacity, and Resource Capacity. Each domain is further defined by standards, which in turn, are defined by Performance Rubrics. Standards: Leadership Capacity Domain, 1.9 Diagnostic

educators Professional staff who are responsible for all aspects of the instructional program, including, but not limited to, content delivery, assessment and academic intervention Engagement Review (formerly External Review) Engagement Review Team (formerly External Review Team) A process that is conducted on-site by a team of qualified and trained educational professionals to 1) evaluate an institution s adherence to the AdvancED Performance Standards; 2) assess the efficacy and impact of its continuous improvement process; 3) assess the effectiveness of the institution s methods for quality assurance; 4) identify strengths deserving of commendations and provide required actions for improvement and; 5) make an accreditation recommendation for national or international approval by an independent commission A selected group of qualified and trained educational professionals who serve as informed experts to assess an institution s adherence to the AdvancED Performance Standards and provide recommendations for continuous improvement Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain -1.7 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.3, 2.5, 2.7, 2.10, 2.11 equitable/equity Access to resources and support based on individual need Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.1, 2.3 eleot formal program or structure Experiences provided by an institution that are consistently implemented, process-oriented and made known to appropriate stakeholder groups Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain - 1.8, 1.9 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain 2.4 Diagnostics - High Expectations, Healthy Culture

governing authority The person or group of people with the highest level of control over an institution that generally has the responsibility for oversight and policy setting Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain - 1.4, 1.5 healthy dialogue healthy relationship(s) induction (program) innovative practices inquiry-based practices institution inventory An exchange of opinions or discussion in which members demonstrate trust, respect and understanding Connections and interactions between people that are respectful and trusting A formal and informal structure provided for new staff members to receive support, guidance, and institutional knowledge during their transition to their new position or place of employment New or revised interventions, actions, or strategies taken to improve the institution and/or student engagement and achievement A multi-step instructional process in which students define, explore and discover possible solutions to a problem where the focus is on the process rather than the outcome An educational unit including any public, private, proprietary, or not-for-profit, pre-k to 13, high school, middle school/junior high, elementary, early learning, special purpose, supplementary, charter, distance, postsecondary non-degree granting or international entity as well as education service agency, school system, and education corporation A diagnostic that captures how an individual perceives his/her experiences at an institution Diagnostic, Healthy Culture Standard: Resource Capacity Domain - 3.3 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.12 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.2 All AdvancED Diagnostics, Standards, etc. Teacher and Student Inventory Diagnostic

job embedded Professional learning that is integrated into the workday; Standard: Resource Capacity Domain - 3.1 connects the learning and the application of the learning learner engagement The willingness of a student to fully participate in the learning process or instructional activity Diagnostic- Impact of Instruction, Efficacy of Engagement, Implementation Capacity learning communities learning culture learning environment learning expectation(s) learning opportunities learning results Structures, formal and informal, that exist and function for the purpose of increasing educator effectiveness and learner results Generally refers to the beliefs, perceptions, relationships, attitudes, and written and unwritten rules that shape and influence the classroom environment; a learning culture should have high expectations that focuses on the educational needs of all students The context in which student learning occurs within a classroom setting or learning situation A competency or skill level students should demonstrate after instruction Planned or spontaneous circumstances that can deepen one's understanding or introduce new information or knowledge Information on student(s) attainment knowledge, skills and/or abilities Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.2 Standard: Resource Capacity Domain - 3.2 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain -2.1, 2.2, 2.3 Diagnostic - Efficacy of Engagement Effective Learning Environments Observation Tool (eleot) Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.1, 2.7 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.1 Standard: Resource Capacity Domain - 3.4 major content areas Generally regarded as the academic or non-elective courses, such as mathematics, language arts/reading/english, science, and social studies Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.7

modeling program A structure that provides an exemplary demonstration through the use of words and actions pertaining to the way in which a certain strategy is applied, discussion is led, classroom behavior is managed, problems are solved, etc. needs assessment A process used to 1) analyze current condition of a desired Standard: Resource Capacity Domain - 3.5 outcome; 2) compare to an agreed upon standard; and 3) identify gaps between the two next levels The subsequent course, grade, or program determined by an institution s structure or criteria Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.5 Diagnostic - Impact of Instruction Pedagogy, pedagogical performance rubric Personalized learning, personalized professional practice reliable sources research-based Generally refers to strategies of instruction, a style of instruction or the process of using one s beliefs about teaching to formulate his/her teaching style. For, a scoring guide consisting of four performance levels that contain evaluative criteria related to concepts contained within the standard statement Custom tailoring of information, instruction, or the curriculum to the individual student An accepted and understood skill, expectation, and body of knowledge that are used to make decisions and execute actions within an institution or learning environment Sources of information that are deemed honest and accurate by the institution through an accepted method of validation Practice that is based on the results or outcomes of current educational research Diagnostic-Implementation Capacity Standard: Resource Capacity Domain - 3.1 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.1 Standard: Resource Capacity Domain - 3.3 Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain - 1.10 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.6

resources Assets and capacity to fulfill the needs of and support for the learning environment; generally, resources are categorized as financial, human, and physical materials Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.9 Standard: Resource Capacity Domain -3.2, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 eleot School and System Quality Factors (SQF) stakeholders A set of research-based elements that provide educational institutions with conditions, processes, practices and actions to focus their improvement efforts Staff, students, parents, community members and others who have a vested interest in the institution School and System Quality Factors Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain - 1.1,1.2, 1.3, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.10 Diagnostics-Efficacy of Engagement, Healthy Culture, High Expectations, Clear Direction systematic, systematically systemic An organized method or process that is consistently implemented The impact a method or process has on all levels and facets of an institution Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain - 1.1, 1.3, 1.6, 1.7, 1.10 Standard: Learning Capacity Domain - 2.6, 2.12 Standard: Leadership Capacity Domain - 1.7

Terms that Measure Frequency, Quality and Quantity all Including more than 75 percent of (e.g., learners, educators, programs, policies) almost always Occurring more than 75 percent of the time consistency With regularity (i.e., at equal intervals) and uniformity (i.e., in a similar manner), usually 75 percent of the time or more excellent quality The highest standard or value fair quality A minimal standard or value few, few to none Less than 25 percent of a specific stakeholder group fully embedded Complete scope and/or intent of policy or practice in place good quality An acceptable standard or value Limited, little Having some restrictions or confinements; a small amount many Including approximately 50 to 75 percent of a specific stakeholder group most Approximately 75 percent or more of a specific stakeholder group; occurring approximately 75 percent of the time mostly embedded Almost complete scope and/or intent of policy or practice in place; about 75 percent or more completed not embedded Minimal or no scope and/or intent of policy or practice in place; less than 25 percent completed

often, frequently Occurring many times or constantly; occurring about 50 to 75 percent of the time partially embedded Incomplete scope and/or intent of policy or practice in place; about 25 to 50 percent completed poor quality Not an acceptable standard or value rarely, never, seldom Occurring infrequently; occurring less than 25 percent of the time regularly Occurring at predicted times or intervals some About 25 to 50 percent of a specific stakeholder group, documents, policies, etc. sometimes sporadically Occurring at various intervals but without consistency; occurring 25 to 50 percent of the time Occurring at irregular intervals; without a pattern or order or time