State Release of Spring 2017 MCAS Data An Update from the Assistant Superintendent for Learning & Teaching October 2017

Similar documents
SYNCRUDE HIGHER EDUCATION AWARDS PROGRAM (SHEAP)

Great Leaders in United States History. Rob Greenwood Hereford High Parkton, Maryland

ELE 3600 Course Syllabus

QuickGuide for SEAS CS Students (New Requirements Beginning Fall 2012)

FAQ: Elementary ELA Instructional Materials. Did WCSD elementary schools purchase reading textbooks during the last adoption cycle?

Contra Costa College: HBCU SPRING 2018 TOUR Application due November 30, 2017

BlueShift - QUT Business School Case Competition for high school students

QuickGuide for CC, GS, and Barnard CS Students

Building a K12 Science Flipgrid Community

Mathematics Course Waivers Trends and Best Practice

ANNUAL REPORT

Jefferson Academy Course Syllabus Pre-Calc/Trigonometry Fall 2017

Alexander von Humboldt - Deutsche Internationale Schule Montreal. German International Abitur and Qualification Period

PowerTeacher Gradebook to PowerTeacher Pro General Information

ONTARIO LEADERSHIP STRATEGY CONVERSATION STARTERS

Author: Maria Gilda Lyghounis. Topic: Olympic Games in ancient Greece and nowadays (Rio de Janeiro 2016) o Main Teacher.

AL YASMINA SCHOOL POST-16 HANDBOOK

Principles of Online Instructional Design RIDT 101 1DL

FIG Commission 2 Newsletter

PROPOSED TEACHER LEADERSHIP FRAMEWORK

HSC 4302: Methods & Materials in Health Education University of Florida, Department of Health Education & Behavior

Ethics and Scientific Integrity: University Policy, its Application and Recommendations

8 Legal Research Methods: Feeling Part of Current Research : The Teaching-Research Link and Professional Communication

STATISTICAL LITERACY and STATISTICAL COMPETENCE in the NEW CENTURY. David S. Moore Purdue University

CHS Women's Soccer 2017

NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum Grade 9 Module 1 Unit 1 Lesson 4

NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL

Police Organization and Administration CJA Credit Hours

Preparing Global Leaders Final Major Recommendations

(Survey Design) Instructorr. Semester. Time/ Day. Meeting Dates. Location. hours.. PROFESSIONAL. Wolakolkiciyapi. initiate. change.

Angelo State University College of Education

School of Business and Nonprofit Management Course Syllabus

A Level DR AFT. O f q u a l a c c r e d. it a ti o n. Specification DRAFT

PHGY 230: Human Anatomy & Physiology II

ENR 1100 SPRING SEMESTER 2017 CFAES SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES

ANNUAL PROGRAM REPORT

EDUC 621 Case Study Assignment Guidelines

Performance Dialogues

Mental health and behaviour in schools 10-minute Briefing

Department of Economics. PhD Programme in Economics 31 st 32 nd 33 rd cohorts. Guide A.Y

Students Placement Office, IIT Kanpur Student Placement Policy (Year )

Project SEARCH Application

Religion and the Spirit of Capitalism

Assessing Multilingual Children

St Matthew s Westminster

Year 3 children's understanding of fractions: are we making progress?

Double Degree Exchange Program 1A-2A at Ecole centrale de Lyon

CO-ED KIDDIE BASKETBALL CAMP

Greening Economies in the European Union s Eastern Neighbourhood (EaP GREEN)

Vegard Nygaard Bergh A study of young Norwegians in English Idiom Processing

North Shore Senior High School AP Spanish Literature and Culture Course Syllabus Mrs. Cuevas

"I'I':L: !-' j\x: 7i DATE PAGES

Tables of Orthogonal Polynomial Values Extended to N: 104

EMILY CARR SECONDARY SCHOOL

Aston University Malaysia Country Manager: Chunmun Kamal 4476) (This update: )

Kick-Off Event Trainee Program - Purchasing. Vienna, February 2 & 3,

1. Programme of the aces Academy 2012

Alumni of Color Website: Reshell Ray

Social Studies / Sciences. 9 Freshmen English Algebra 1 Integrated Science World Studies PE 1 Intro to Culinary Arts: Cooking 101

JAIl; feb 1978 nl.2&.price ;10

YEAR 4 (PART A) Textbook 4A schema

Specialist for companies facing transition

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

Short Report about the Laity-General Promoter s visit to some Fraternities of Germany (Teutonia) and France (Province of France)

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Proficiency Illusion

ASIA. 4D3N Discover Sri Lanka RM 1,

Testing Schedule. Explained

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

EPSCR o EPSCR. Institute t for Functional Nanomaterials RESEARCH IN PUERTO RICO RESEARCH IN PUERTO RICO

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Student Learning Objectives Overview for New Districts

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

AB 167/216 Graduation. kids-alliance.org/programs/education. Alliance for Children s Rights

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Shelters Elementary School

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Vertical Teaming. in a small school

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

Program Assessment and Alignment

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Review of Student Assessment Data

Program Information. The Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators' Association together with TEACHERS21

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

World s Best Workforce Plan

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Journalism Liberal Arts Mathematics Music Physical Education Physics Political Science

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

The New York City Department of Education. Grade 5 Mathematics Benchmark Assessment. Teacher Guide Spring 2013

Transcription:

State Release f Spring MCAS Data An Update frm the Assistant Superintendent fr Learning & Teaching Octber MCAS Results Released by DESE As yu may knw, the Massachusetts Department f Secndary and Elementary Educatin (DESE) released results tday fr last spring s state assessments. This includes Grades 3-8 Next-Generatin MCAS results fr bth English Language Arts and Mathematics, the Science and Technlgy/Engineering MCAS results fr Grades 5/8/10, as well as the high schl MCAS results fr English Language Arts and Mathematics. The MCAS assessment data are assembled in several different tables belw. In additin t the achievement levels in each cntent area, we have als created tables t review the median Student Grwth Percentiles, as that data als prvide us imprtant infrmatin. The Student Grwth Percentile () measures hw much a student s perfrmance has imprved frm ne year t the next relative t his r her academic peers (ther students statewide with similar achievement results in prir years). Belw are sme imprtant pints frm the DESE regarding the results fr the next-generatin MCAS... The results released this week include scres frm the next-generatin MCAS, an updated versin f the test that was given fr the first time in spring t students in grades 3-8 in English language arts and mathematics. Eventually, all MCAS tests will be next-generatin MCAS. The next-generatin MCAS was develped after the Bard f Elementary and Secndary Educatin vted in Nvember 2015 t create a next-generatin, cmputer-based, and Massachusetts-specific test. It is an updated versin f the nearly 20-year-ld MCAS assessment and fcuses n students' critical thinking abilities, ability t apply their knwledge and ability t make cnnectins between reading and writing. It gives a clearer signal f readiness fr the next grade level, and the majrity f students in grades 3-8 tk the next-generatin MCAS n a cmputer. The DESE expects that the mve t cmputer-based testing shuld be cmplete by spring 2019. The achievement scre levels fr the next-generatin MCAS are different frm thse f the legacy MCAS. Next-generatin MCAS scres fall int these fur categries: Expectatins, Expectatins, Partially Expectatins, and Nt Expectatins. Apprximately fifty percent f grades 3-8 students in the state are already scring in the r Expectatins categries n the new test. Sme students will find, hwever, that they scred Prficient n the legacy MCAS in 2016 but nly Partially Expectatins n the next-generatin MCAS in. Students, parents and educatrs shuld keep in mind that: In general, the new standards fr Expectatins are mre rigrus than the standards fr reaching the Prficient level n the legacy MCAS. Massachusetts educatrs set the new standards t help signal students readiness fr the next grade level and indicate when students might need additinal help t succeed. Ultimately, this will give students a better sense f what they need t d t be prepared fr cllege r ther pst-secndary training. Spring is a baseline year fr a new test in grades 3-8, and spring scres shuld nt be cmpared t previus years scres. 1

The fact that apprximately 50 percent f students were Expectatins r abve in each f the next-generatin MCAS grades and subjects reflects the scring standards that 125 Massachusetts educatrs set this summer when they reviewed test questins and student respnses and cmpared them t what students need t knw t be successful in the next grade. The 50 percent is nt a grading curve; it is where the scres fell after educatrs set the standards. The educatrs valued bth readiness fr the next grade level and cnsistent acrss grades. A higher percentage f students are likely t scre Expectatins r abve in future years as students and schls becme mre familiar with the tests'. The cnsistency f the scring standards is ne benefit f creating the entire grades 3-8 nextgeneratin MCAS at nce. The legacy MCAS began in islated grades and was intrduced in ther grades in subsequent years, each time requiring a separate standard setting prcess fr that specific test. That meant that while, fr instance, the furth-grade scring standards were the same every year, they did nt necessarily reflect the same level f as the third- r fifth-grade scring standards. High schl students are still taking the legacy MCAS tests. The next-generatin tests will be intrduced at the high schl level in spring 2019. All Next-Generatin MCAS schls (Grade 3-8 schls) wh meet participatin and graduatin rate requirements will nt receive an accuntability level. Assessment results will serve as the new baseline fr target-setting in 2018 and beynd. Parents shuld receive their child's scres frm their schl district in late Octber r early Nvember. As all the data has just been made released, staff are cntinuing t review all the infrmatin that is nw available fr each schl, grade level, and cntent area. We are als, f curse, cntinuing t imprve the curriculum, instructin, and assessment in all cntent areas and grade levels in rder t better align with the next-generatin state assessments. In upcming weeks, the district, schl, and student results will be used t identify ur current strengths and weaknesses, review curriculum and instructinal alignment, and identify apprpriate interventins fr students where applicable. We will als utilize released assessment items including test questins, scring rubrics, and examples f scred student respnses t infrm ur practice. An verview presentatin f the district assessment data will be given fr the Schl Cmmittee later this fall, and each schl will als be ding its wn schl-level presentatin in rder t mre fully discuss and identify each schl s individual prgress. If yu have any questins, feel free t cntact yur schl Principal r the district administratin ffices. Belw als are several links t the DESE website fr further infrmatin abut Reading s results and the nextgeneratin MCAS. Reading Public Schls / DESE Assessment Prfile http://prfiles.de.mass.edu/mcas/achievement_level.aspx?linkid=32&rgcde=02460000&rgtypecde=5& Parents Guide t the Massachusetts Cmprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) http://www.de.mass.edu/dl/e-learning/mcas-parentguide/cntent/index.html#/?_k=e82zj7 Frequently Asked Questins (FAQs) abut next-generatin MCAS Results http://www.de.mass.edu/mcas/parents/results-faq.html 2

English Language Arts & Mathematics MCAS Fr Reading Memrial High Schl (with verall state data and als 2016/2015 results) High Schl English Language Arts and Mathematics MCAS (Percentage f Students at each achievement scre level) 2016 2015 Higher Adv Prf NI W Higher Adv Prf NI W Higher Adv Prf NI W RMHS ELA 97 59 38 3 0 99 64 35 1 0 98 69 29 1 1 RMHS Math 94 68 26 4 2 93 70 23 5 2 92 74 18 7 2 State HS ELA 91 47 44 6 3 92 47 45 6 3 91 49 42 6 3 State HS Math 79 53 26 14 8 78 54 24 15 8 78 53 25 13 8 Adv=Advanced / Prf=Prficient / NI=Needs Imprvement / W=Warning (Failing) High Schl Student Grwth Percentiles () 2016 2015 High Grwth Mderate Grwth Lw Grwth Mderate t High Grwth Median Mderate t High Grwth Median Mderate t High Grwth RMHS ELA 36 19 45 55 44 57 48 58 46 RMHS Math 34 22 45 56 46 62 55 64 54.5 Massachusetts measures grwth fr students by cmparing the change in their achievement n statewide assessments t that f their academic peers (all ther students in the state wh previusly had similar histrical assessment results). The state defines mderate (r expected) grwth t be between the 40-60 percentile, with lw grwth as belw the 40 th percentile and high abve the 60 th percentile. Median Science and Technlgy/Engineering MCAS Fr all Reading Public Schls (with verall state data and als 2016/2015 results) Science and Technlgy/Engineering MCAS (Percentage f Students, by schl, at each achievement scre level) 2016 2015 Higher Adv Prf NI W Higher Adv Prf NI W Higher Adv Prf NI W Barrws 69 27 42 30 1 47 8 39 47 6 61 15 46 32 7 Birch Meadw 44 21 23 44 13 57 18 39 36 6 60 15 45 36 4 Eatn 55 22 33 38 7 54 21 33 43 3 78 20 58 20 3 Killam 57 15 42 38 6 53 18 35 38 9 61 8 53 32 6 Wd End 71 31 40 24 6 72 19 53 26 2 72 20 52 25 3 Clidge 55 7 48 32 14 46 5 41 39 14 38 1 37 51 12 Parker 62 3 59 33 5 61 8 53 34 5 58 2 56 35 7 RMHS 89 39 50 11 1 92 40 52 8 0 86 37 49 13 1 State Gr 5 46 17 29 39 15 47 16 31 38 14 51 16 35 37 13 State Gr 8 40 3 37 40 20 41 6 35 40 19 42 3 39 40 18 State HS 74 32 42 21 5 73 29 44 21 5 71 27 44 23 5 Adv=Advanced / Prf=Prficient / NI=Needs Imprvement / W=Warning (Failing) 3

English Language Arts Next-Generatin MCAS Achievement Levels: Expectatins Expectatins Partially Expectatins Nt Expectatins English Language Arts / MCAS (Percentage f students, by schl and grade level, at each achievement level) Nt meeting Partially r Expectatins State Grade 3 10 42 39 8 47 Grade 4 10 42 41 7 48 Grade 5 10 42 43 6 49 Barrws Grade 3 0 31 57 11 68 Grade 4 4 26 53 17 70 Grade 5 1 37 55 6 61 Birch Meadw Grade 3 2 30 59 10 69 Grade 4 4 39 44 13 57 Grade 5 7 45 42 6 48 Eatn Grade 3 8 39 47 5 52 Grade 4 5 36 51 5 56 Grade 5 6 46 36 13 49 Killam Grade 3 4 49 44 3 47 Grade 4 1 39 45 15 60 Grade 5 0 44 53 3 56 Wd End Grade 3 9 26 57 9 66 Grade 4 7 27 46 20 66 Grade 5 4 34 57 4 61 State Grade 6 10 39 43 7 50 Grade 7 11 39 44 6 50 Grade 8 11 39 41 8 49 Clidge Grade 6 6 30 55 10 65 Grade 7 3 15 63 19 82 Grade 8 6 28 48 18 66 Parker Grade 6 3 30 53 14 67 Grade 7 3 27 58 12 70 Grade 8 6 34 54 6 60 (See next page fr Math results) 4

Mathematics Next-Generatin MCAS Achievement Levels: Expectatins Expectatins Partially Expectatins Nt Expectatins Mathematics / MCAS (Percentage f students, by schl and grade level, at each achievement level) Nt meeting Partially r Expectatins State Grade 3 13 38 42 7 49 Grade 4 13 39 43 6 49 Grade 5 10 44 39 7 46 Barrws Grade 3 10 28 52 10 62 Grade 4 4 21 57 19 76 Grade 5 3 34 55 7 62 Birch Meadw Grade 3 2 19 65 14 79 Grade 4 7 26 63 4 67 Grade 5 10 45 35 10 45 Eatn Grade 3 14 26 52 9 61 Grade 4 13 27 51 10 61 Grade 5 6 46 36 13 49 Killam Grade 3 10 43 43 4 47 Grade 4 3 40 44 13 57 Grade 5 4 56 31 10 41 Wd End Grade 3 9 20 52 20 72 Grade 4 10 22 61 7 68 Grade 5 4 34 51 10 61 State Grade 6 11 39 42 7 49 Grade 7 12 42 38 9 47 Grade 8 11 42 39 9 48 Clidge Grade 6 7 24 64 5 69 Grade 7 2 20 64 14 78 Grade 8 8 28 38 26 64 Parker Grade 6 3 40 54 4 58 Grade 7 2 24 62 13 75 Grade 8 4 38 46 12 58 (See next page fr infrmatin) 5

Student Grwth Percentiles () Massachusetts measures grwth fr individual students by cmparing the change in their achievement n statewide assessments t that f their academic peers (all ther students in the state wh previusly had similar histrical assessment results). The state defines mderate (r expected) grwth t be between the 40-60 percentile, with lw grwth as belw the 40 th percentile and high grwth as abve the 60 th percentile. English Language Arts / Mathematics Student Grwth Percentiles (Median ) Schl/Grade English Language Arts MCAS 2016 PARCC / 2015 PARCC Mathematics MCAS 2016 PARCC / 2015 PARCC 2016 2015 2016 2015 Barrws Grade 3 Grade 4 54.0 60.5 54.0 69.0 51.5 83.0 Grade 5 34.0 31.0 62.0 38.0 30.0 46.0 Birch Grade 3 Grade 4 47.0 58.5 62.0 59.0 54.0 76.0 Grade 5 37.0 53.0 49.0 44.0 49.0 62.0 Eatn Grade 3 Grade 4 62.0 41.0 60.0 65.5 58.0 69.0 Grade 5 53.0 65.5 68.5 57.0 59.0 90.0 Killam Grade 3 Grade 4 46.0 55.0 44.5 55.5 50.0 47.0 Grade 5 48.0 64.0 53.5 52.0 54.0 48.0 Wd End Grade 3 Grade 4 57.0 56.0 50.5 57.0 31.0 64.0 Grade 5 53.0 47.0 67.0 77.0 78.0 93.0 Clidge Grade 6 50.0 53.0 62.0 48.0 68.0 60.0 Grade 7 72.0 62.0 70.5 58.0 72.5 68.0 Grade 8 61.5 68.0 58.5 65.5 69.0 53.5 Algebra I 70.0 84.0 Parker Grade 6 60.5 67.0 65.0 48.0 72.0 73.0 Grade 7 48.5 56.0 69.0 55.5 57.0 54.0 Grade 8 31.0 45.0 48.0 35.0 29.0 33.0 Algebra I 65.0 81.5 Schl Accuntability Level RMHS Level 2 Clidge Parker Barrws Birch Meadw Eatn Killam Wd End 6