Validated Achievement Level Descriptions for AP Language and Culture Exams

Similar documents
Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

Timeline. Recommendations

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

One Stop Shop For Educators

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Secondary English-Language Arts

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Language Center. Course Catalog

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Creating Travel Advice

21st Century Community Learning Center

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Wheelchair Rugby. The performance of skills and techniques in isolation/unopposed situations

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

EQuIP Review Feedback

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

November 2012 MUET (800)

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

Scoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12)

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

South Carolina English Language Arts

School Leadership Rubrics

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

K-12 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Making Sales Calls. Watertown High School, Watertown, Massachusetts. 1 hour, 4 5 days per week

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

College Entrance Testing:

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

This publication is also available for download at

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Spanish III Class Description

Language Acquisition Chart

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Essentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

All 11 th grade students attending public schools in Colorado will take the SAT. The SAT without essay is the default registration for all students.

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

4 Almost always mention the topic and the overall idea of simple. 3 Oftentimes mention the topic and the overall idea of simple

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

AP SPANISH LANGUAGE 2009 PRESENTATIONAL WRITING SCORING GUIDELINES SCORE DESCRIPTION TASK COMPLETION* TOPIC DEVELOPMENT* LANGUAGE USE*

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Curriculum MYP. Class: MYP1 Subject: French Teacher: Chiara Lanciano Phase: 1

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Undergraduate Programs INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE STUDIES. BA: Spanish Studies 33. BA: Language for International Trade 50

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

University of New Orleans

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

Sample Goals and Benchmarks

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

ONLINE COURSES. Flexibility to Meet Middle and High School Students at Their Point of Need

Idaho Public Schools

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

English IV Version: Beta

With guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

West Windsor-Plainsboro Regional School District French Grade 7

Evaluation Off Off On On

Virtual Seminar Courses: Issues from here to there

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Modern Languages. Introduction. Degrees Offered

Transcription:

Validated Achievement Level Descriptions for AP Language and Culture Exams AP French Language and Culture AP German Language and Culture AP Italian Language and Culture AP Spanish Language and Culture EFFECTIVE 2015 College Board, Advanced Placement Program, AP, SAT, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board. Visit the College Board on the web: collegeboard.org.

About the College Board The College Board is a mission-driven not-for-profit organization that connects students to college success and opportunity. Founded in 1900, the College Board was created to expand access to higher education. Today, the membership association is made up of more than 6,000 of the world s leading educational institutions and is dedicated to promoting excellence and equity in education. Each year, the College Board helps more than seven million students prepare for a successful transition to college through programs and services in college readiness and college success including the SAT and the Advanced Placement Program. The organization also serves the education community through research and advocacy on behalf of students, educators, and schools. For further information, visit www.collegeboard.org. Equity and Access Policy The College Board strongly encourages educators to make equitable access a guiding principle for their AP programs by giving all willing and academically prepared students the opportunity to participate in AP. We encourage the elimination of barriers that restrict access to AP for students from ethnic, racial, and socioeconomic groups that have been traditionally underrepresented. Schools should make every effort to ensure their AP classes reflect the diversity of their student population. The College Board also believes that all students should have access to academically challenging course work before they enroll in AP classes, which can prepare them for AP success. It is only through a commitment to equitable preparation and access that true equity and excellence can be achieved. ii

Contents Introduction iii AP French, German, Italian, and Spanish Language and Culture Achievement Level Descriptions Interpretive Mode 1 Interpersonal Mode 2 Presentational Mode 3 iii

Introduction Learning Objectives and Achievement Level Descriptions in the Curriculum Frameworks At the core of the AP French, German, Italian, and Spanish Language and Culture courses are the learning objectives identifying what students should know and be able to do across the three modes of communication: Interpretive, Interpersonal, and Presentational. In the curriculum frameworks for each of these courses, the degree to which student performance meets the learning objectives is articulated in achievement level descriptions, which clearly define how well students at each level are expected to perform. These achievement level descriptions are meant to provide detailed information to teachers as they teach their courses about the expectations for student performance at each AP score level. While references to levels 1 5 in the curriculum framework achievement level descriptions cannot precisely predict a student s ultimate AP Exam score, AP teachers can use this information to develop better insight into individual student performance in the classroom and adjust the curriculum and instruction throughout the course. Validated Achievement Level Descriptions for AP Language and Culture Exams The achievement level descriptions include descriptions of elements of student performance that may be assessed during the course, but that are not necessarily assessed on the exam. The intent of this document is to share the validated achievement level descriptions of student performance that pertain directly to the AP Exam in each of these languages. After the first administration of the exams, College Board psychometricians led a study in which panels of college and university subject area experts reviewed the achievement level descriptions. These faculty panels were charged with comparing the achievement level descriptions against exam items and sample student answers to determine how well the expectations described in the curriculum framework align with how students actually performed. The validation study panels provided feedback to the AP program and recommended minor adjustments to the achievement level descriptions for the exams based on their observations. The validated achievement level descriptions provided in this document accurately describe student performance in the three modes of communication at each score level on the AP French, German, Italian, and Spanish Language and Culture exams and are intended to be a helpful resource tool for educators and students. iv

AP Validated Language and Culture Achievement Level Descriptions Interpretive Mode Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving a score of 1: a score of 2: a score of 3: a score of 4: a score of 5: Comprehension of Content identifies main ideas and details when the correct answer is stated directly (nearly verbatim) in the text, seldom responds accurately to basic information questions (who, what, when, where-type questions), and rarely responds to questions that require identifies a few main ideas and details on familiar topics, sometimes responds accurately to basic information questions (e.g. who, what, when, where-type questions), and rarely responds to questions that require identifies several main ideas and details on familiar topics, responds accurately to basic information questions (e.g. who, what, when, where-type questions), and responds to a limited number of questions that require identifies most main ideas and some significant details on a range of topics, responds accurately to basic information questions (e.g. who, what, why, when, where-type questions), and responds to some questions that require identifies main ideas and significant details on a range of topics, responds accurately to basic information questions (e.g. who, what, why, when, where-type questions), and differentiates facts from opinions by accurately answering questions that require Text Analysis identifies distinguishing features of the text (e.g., the type of resource, the purpose or intended audience of the text, and tone) only when the correct answer is stated directly (nearly verbatim) in the text. identifies a few of distinguishing features of the text (e.g. the type of resource, intended audience, purpose of the resource, and tone). identifies several of the distinguishing features of the text (e.g. the type of resource, intended audience and purpose of the resource, and tone). identifies most of the distinguishing features of the text (e.g. the type of resource, intended audience, purpose of the resource, and tone). identifies the significant distinguishing features of the text (e.g. the type of resource, intended audience, purpose, and tone). Vocabulary comprehends basic vocabulary limited to familiar thematic word groups, made up mostly of memorized phrases. comprehends a limited range of vocabulary from familiar thematic word groups, including memorized phrases and a few comprehends a variety of vocabulary from familiar thematic word groups, including some comprehends most vocabulary, including some culturally appropriate and idiomatic expressions related to familiar or studied topics. comprehends a wide range of vocabulary, including culturally appropriate and some idiomatic expressions related to familiar or studied topics and some unfamiliar topics. Context is seldom able to use context to deduce the meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary. is occasionally able to use context to deduce the meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary. is sometimes able to use context to deduce the meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary. is often able to use context to deduce the meaning of some unfamiliar vocabulary. is usually able to use context to deduce the meaning of unfamiliar words. Cultural Awareness & Comparison shows little or no awareness of cultural products and culture(s) and minimal understanding of basic content of familiar present in the resource. Is generally unable to identify identifies a few common cultural products and culture(s) and demonstrates limited understanding of basic content of familiar present in the resource. Identifies minimal geographic, historical, artistic, social, or political features of target culture communities. identifies the cultural products and practices of the target culture(s), and demonstrates an understanding of basic content of familiar in the resource. Identifies a few identifies the products and practices and some perspectives of the target culture(s) and demonstrates understanding of some content of familiar presented in the resource. Compares and contrasts some geographic, artistic, identifies the relationship among products, practices, and perspectives of the target culture(s) and demonstrates an understanding of most of the content of familiar presented in the resource. Compares and contrasts a variety of geographic, artistic, 5

AP Validated Language and Culture Achievement Level Descriptions Interpersonal Mode Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving a score of 1 a score of 2 a score of 3 a score of 4 a score of 5 Comprehensibility is barely understandable in paragraphing), with frequent or significant errors that is partially understandable in paragraphing), with errors that force interpretation and is generally understandable in paragraphing), with errors that may impede comprehensibility. is fully understandable in paragraphing), with several errors that do not impede comprehensibility. is fully understandable in paragraphing), with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not Vocabulary uses very basic, limited vocabulary. uses limited vocabulary. uses suffcient vocabulary including a few idiomatic expressions. usually uses appropriate vocabulary, including some uses varied and appropriate vocabulary, including Language Control demonstrates little or no control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses simple, often memorized sentences and phrases; demonstrates little or no control of time frames. demonstrates limited control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses simple sentences and phrases; demonstrates some accuracy in present time and little or no accuracy in other time frames. demonstrates some control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses simple and a few compound sentences; is mostly accurate in present time and demonstrates limited accuracy in other time frames. demonstrates general control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses simple, compound, and a few complex sentences; is mostly accurate in present time with some accuracy in other time frames. demonstrates control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses a variety of simple and compound sentences and some complex sentences; narrates and describes in the present, past, and future time frames with general accuracy. Register demonstrates little or no control of register. demonstrates minimal awareness of register, using mainly the familiar register. demonstrates an inconsistent use of appropriate register; shifts between formal and informal register occur. usually demonstrates use of appropriate register, except for some occasional shifts between formal and informal register. usually demonstrates use of appropriate register, with consistent use, despite a few occasional shifts between formal and informal register. Cultural Awareness & Comparison shows little or no awareness of cultural products and culture(s) and geographic, artistic, social, or political features of target culture communities as appropriate to the task. identifies a few common cultural products and culture(s) and a few geographic, artistic, social, or political features of target culture communities as appropriate to the task. identifies some products and culture(s) and may identify a few common perspectives of the target culture(s) with inaccuracies. Identifies some geographic, artistic, target culture communities as appropriate to the task. identifies and describes with some details the products and culture(s) and may identify some perspectives of the target culture(s) with some inaccuracies. Compares and contrasts some geographic, artistic, social, or political features of target culture communities as appropriate to the task. identifies the relationship among products, practices, and perspectives of the target culture(s) and compares them with his/her own culture. Compares and contrasts a variety of geographic, artistic, target culture communities as appropriate to the task. 6

AP Validated Language and Culture Achievement Level Descriptions Presentational Mode Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving a score of 1 a score of 2 a score of 3 a score of 4 a score of 5 Presentation Quality offers little or no treatment of the topic in oral and written presentations, consisting mostly of repetition of the prompt or information from the source materials; may not refer to any of the source materials provided. offers an inadequate treatment of the topic in oral and written presentations, consisting mostly of statements with no development; may use inaccurate examples or make inaccurate references to source materials provided, or may not refer to all source materials provided. offers an adequate treatment of the topic in oral and written presentations, including a few supporting details and references to all source materials provided. offers an effective treatment of the topic in oral and written presentations, including some supporting details and mostly relevant examples, and references to all source materials provided. offers a thorough and effective treatment of the topic in oral and written presentations, including supporting details and relevant examples, and references to all source materials provided. Organization & Level Of Discourse demonstrates little or no organization in spoken and written responses, lack of transitional and cohesive devices. demonstrates inadequate organization in spoken and written responses, and ineffective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices. demonstrates some organization in spoken and written responses, including a few basic transitional elements or cohesive devices. demonstrates organization in spoken and written responses, including some effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices. demonstrates effective organization in spoken and written responses, including effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices. Comprehensibility is barely understandable in paragraphing), with frequent or significant errors that is partially understandable in paragraphing), with errors that force interpretation and is generally understandable in paragraphing), with errors that may impede comprehensibility. is fully understandable in paragraphing), with several errors that do not impede comprehensibility. is fully understandable in paragraphing), with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not Vocabulary uses very basic, limited vocabulary. uses limited vocabulary. uses suffcient vocabulary including a few idiomatic expressions. usually uses appropriate vocabulary, including some uses varied and appropriate vocabulary, including Language Control demonstrates little or no control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses simple, often memorized sentences and phrases; demonstrates little or no control of time frames. demonstrates limited control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses simple sentences and phrases; demonstrates some accuracy in present time and little or no accuracy in other time frames. demonstrates some control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses simple and a few compound sentences; is mostly accurate in present time and demonstrates limited accuracy in other time frames. demonstrates general control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses simple, compound, and a few complex sentences; is most accurate in present time with some accuracy in other time frames. demonstrates control of grammar, syntax, and usage; uses a variety of simple and compound sentences and some complex sentences; narrates and describes in the present, past, and future time frames with general accuracy. 7

AP Validated Language and Culture Achievement Level Descriptions Presentational Mode Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving Student receiving a score of 1 a score of 2 a score of 3 a score of 4 a score of 5 Register demonstrates little or no control of register. demonstrates minimal awareness of register, uses mainly the familiar register. demonstrates an inconsistent use of appropriate register; shifts between formal and informal register occur. usually demonstrates appropriate use of register, except for some occasional shifts between formal and informal register. usually demonstrates appropriate use of register, with consistent use despite a few occasional shifts between the formal and informal register. Cultural Awareness & Comparison shows little or no awareness of cultural products and culture(s) and minimal understanding of basic content of familiar present in the source materials. Is unable to identify identifies a few common cultural products or culture(s); demonstrates limited understanding of some content of familiar presented in the source materials; and a few identifies some cultural products and practices of the target culture(s) and may identify a few common perspectives, but with inaccuracies; demonstrates some understanding of some content of familiar presented in the source materials. Identifies a few identifies and describes, with some details, the products and culture(s); may identify some perspectives of the target culture(s) with some inaccuracies; demonstrates an understanding of much of the content of familiar presented in the source materials. Compares and contrasts some geographic, artistic, social, or political features of target culture communities. identifies with some elaboration, the relationship among products, practices, and perspectives of the target culture(s) and demonstrates an understanding of most of the content of familiar presented in the source materials. Compares and contrasts a variety of geographic, artistic, social, or political features of target culture communities. 8