Highlights of House Bill 3 Transition Plan

Similar documents
FAQ: Elementary ELA Instructional Materials. Did WCSD elementary schools purchase reading textbooks during the last adoption cycle?

QuickGuide for SEAS CS Students (New Requirements Beginning Fall 2012)

SYNCRUDE HIGHER EDUCATION AWARDS PROGRAM (SHEAP)

ANNUAL REPORT

ELE 3600 Course Syllabus

QuickGuide for CC, GS, and Barnard CS Students

BlueShift - QUT Business School Case Competition for high school students

Alexander von Humboldt - Deutsche Internationale Schule Montreal. German International Abitur and Qualification Period

Great Leaders in United States History. Rob Greenwood Hereford High Parkton, Maryland

Mathematics Course Waivers Trends and Best Practice

Ethics and Scientific Integrity: University Policy, its Application and Recommendations

Principles of Online Instructional Design RIDT 101 1DL

PROPOSED TEACHER LEADERSHIP FRAMEWORK

Jefferson Academy Course Syllabus Pre-Calc/Trigonometry Fall 2017

Contra Costa College: HBCU SPRING 2018 TOUR Application due November 30, 2017

Preparing Global Leaders Final Major Recommendations

AL YASMINA SCHOOL POST-16 HANDBOOK

ONTARIO LEADERSHIP STRATEGY CONVERSATION STARTERS

HSC 4302: Methods & Materials in Health Education University of Florida, Department of Health Education & Behavior

Building a K12 Science Flipgrid Community

NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL

PowerTeacher Gradebook to PowerTeacher Pro General Information

CHS Women's Soccer 2017

St Matthew s Westminster

ANNUAL PROGRAM REPORT

8 Legal Research Methods: Feeling Part of Current Research : The Teaching-Research Link and Professional Communication

(Survey Design) Instructorr. Semester. Time/ Day. Meeting Dates. Location. hours.. PROFESSIONAL. Wolakolkiciyapi. initiate. change.

PHGY 230: Human Anatomy & Physiology II

Students Placement Office, IIT Kanpur Student Placement Policy (Year )

FIG Commission 2 Newsletter

Double Degree Exchange Program 1A-2A at Ecole centrale de Lyon

Project SEARCH Application

Police Organization and Administration CJA Credit Hours

Greening Economies in the European Union s Eastern Neighbourhood (EaP GREEN)

Angelo State University College of Education

Mental health and behaviour in schools 10-minute Briefing

School of Business and Nonprofit Management Course Syllabus

NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum Grade 9 Module 1 Unit 1 Lesson 4

EMILY CARR SECONDARY SCHOOL

ENR 1100 SPRING SEMESTER 2017 CFAES SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES

Author: Maria Gilda Lyghounis. Topic: Olympic Games in ancient Greece and nowadays (Rio de Janeiro 2016) o Main Teacher.

Religion and the Spirit of Capitalism

Department of Economics. PhD Programme in Economics 31 st 32 nd 33 rd cohorts. Guide A.Y

"I'I':L: !-' j\x: 7i DATE PAGES

Performance Dialogues

A Level DR AFT. O f q u a l a c c r e d. it a ti o n. Specification DRAFT

EDUC 621 Case Study Assignment Guidelines

STATISTICAL LITERACY and STATISTICAL COMPETENCE in the NEW CENTURY. David S. Moore Purdue University

Vegard Nygaard Bergh A study of young Norwegians in English Idiom Processing

Aston University Malaysia Country Manager: Chunmun Kamal 4476) (This update: )

Alumni of Color Website: Reshell Ray

Assessing Multilingual Children

CO-ED KIDDIE BASKETBALL CAMP

Year 3 children's understanding of fractions: are we making progress?

Social Studies / Sciences. 9 Freshmen English Algebra 1 Integrated Science World Studies PE 1 Intro to Culinary Arts: Cooking 101

YEAR 4 (PART A) Textbook 4A schema

Tables of Orthogonal Polynomial Values Extended to N: 104

EPSCR o EPSCR. Institute t for Functional Nanomaterials RESEARCH IN PUERTO RICO RESEARCH IN PUERTO RICO

Kick-Off Event Trainee Program - Purchasing. Vienna, February 2 & 3,

Specialist for companies facing transition

North Shore Senior High School AP Spanish Literature and Culture Course Syllabus Mrs. Cuevas

1. Programme of the aces Academy 2012

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

African American Male Achievement Update

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

Cuero Independent School District

SEBASTIAN WATZL: CURRICULUM VITAE

JAIl; feb 1978 nl.2&.price ;10

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

State Parental Involvement Plan

Short Report about the Laity-General Promoter s visit to some Fraternities of Germany (Teutonia) and France (Province of France)

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

ASIA. 4D3N Discover Sri Lanka RM 1,

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Garland Independent School District Davis Elementary School Improvement Plan

Journalism Liberal Arts Mathematics Music Physical Education Physics Political Science

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Shelters Elementary School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Senior Parent Meeting What s next?

Heritage High School Home of the Coyotes. Class of 2017 Registration for Senior Classes

ED : Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Transcription:

Highlights f Huse Bill 3 Transitin Plan Assessment The new, mre rigrus State f Texas Assessments f Academic Readiness (STAAR) prgram will begin in the 2011 2012 schl year. A new test design fr the STAAR assessments will fcus n readiness fr success in subsequent grades r curses and, ultimately, fr cllege and career. At grades 3 8, STAAR will include assessments in the fllwing grades/subjects: mathematics and reading at grades 3 8, including Spanish versins at grades 3 5 writing at grades 4 and 7, including Spanish versin at grade 4 science at grade 5, including a Spanish versin at grade 5 science at grade 8 scial studies at grade 8 Fr high schl, STAAR assessments will be administered in Algebra I, gemetry, Algebra II, bilgy, chemistry, physics, English I, English II, English III, wrld gegraphy, wrld histry, and U.S. histry. The STAAR EOC assessment scres will accunt fr 15% f a student s final grade in the curse. The test design fr English I, II, and III will require students t write tw essays rather than the ne that TAKS required. In reading, greater emphasis will be given t critical analysis rather than literal understanding. The test design will als allw fr the reading and writing cmpnents t be calibrated, equated, and scaled separately s that the scres n the reading and writing cmpnents can be reprted separately. This will allw a student t retake nly the prtin f the English EOC assessment n which he r she did nt meet the minimum scre requirements. Because f the length f these tests and the desire t embed field-test items t eliminate stand-alne field testing, each f the English EOC assessments will be administered ver tw days. All ther EOC assessments will be administered n ne day nly during a scheduled assessment windw. STAAR grades 3-8 assessments will be administered n paper nly; STAAR EOC assessments will be ffered in bth nline and paper frmats. With the implementatin f STAAR in the 2011 2012 schl year, testing requirements fr graduatin will significantly increase. While TAKS represented fur hurdles fr students (requiring them t pass exit level tests in mathematics, English language arts, science, and scial studies), STAAR represents 12 hurdles fr students taking the recmmended high schl prgram. T graduate under STAAR, a student must achieve a cumulative scre that is at least equal t the prduct f the number f EOC assessments taken in each fundatin cntent area (English language arts, mathematics, science, and scial studies) and a scale scre that indicates satisfactry perfrmance. Perfrmance levels n certain STAAR EOC assessments are nw linked t a student s graduatin plan. Different levels f perfrmance are required n the EOC assessments in English III and Algebra II fr each f the three graduatin plans: minimum, recmmended, and distinguished. 1

STAAR perfrmance standards will be set s that they require a higher level f student perfrmance than is required n the current TAKS assessments. STAAR perfrmance standards fr STAAR EOC will be set in February 2012 and reprts will be available in June 2012 after the first May 2012 administratin. Perfrmance standards fr STAAR at grades 3 8 will be set in fall 2012, after the first spring administratin f STAAR. This standard-setting schedule will result in the fllwing: The Student Success Initiative (SSI) prmtin requirements will nt include use f the STAAR results in the 2011 2012 schl year nly, since passing standards will nt yet be established. Statute cntinues t require the use f ther academic infrmatin (teacher recmmendatins, student grades, etc.) in prmtin decisins. Reprting f STAAR grades 3-8 results will be delayed until fall 2012. Each general grade 3-8 and EOC STAAR assessment will have a satisfactry cut scre and an advanced cut scre. There will als be EOC minimum scres set belw but within a reasnable range f the satisfactry scres which will be used t determine whether a student s scre n a particular EOC assessment may cunt twards his r her cumulative scre in that cntent area. Perfrmance at the highest cut scre will be interpreted differently depending n the assessment. Fr example, this highest cut will indicate cllege readiness fr Algebra II and English III. It will indicate advanced curse readiness fr Algebra I, English I, and II, and it will indicate advanced perfrmance fr the remaining curses. It is anticipated that the satisfactry perfrmance standards fr STAAR will be phased in ver several years, but the highest perfrmance standard (including the cllege and career readiness standards fr Algebra II and English III) wuld nt be phased in, but applied as apprved when STAAR becmes peratinal. Perfrmance standards will be reviewed at least every three years, as required by state statute. As with the current mdified assessments, the STAAR Mdified assessments will cver the same cntent as the general STAAR assessments, but will be mdified in frmat and test design. Mdified assessments will be develped fr all cntent areas fr grades 3-8 that are part f the general STAAR prgram and fr nine f the twelve STAAR EOC assessments. Mdified assessments are nt being develped fr Algebra II, chemistry, r physics as these curses are nt required n the Minimum High Schl Prgram (MHSP) and all students taking STAAR Mdified assessments are n the MHSP because they are receiving mdified instructin. The new STAAR Mdified assessments will reflect the same increased rigr and fcus f the general assessments and nw will include mre rigrus item types. In additin, field-test items will be embedded in the mdified assessments. The STAAR Alternate assessments will be very similar in design t the current TAKS-Alt assessments. Students will cntinue t perfrm standardized assessment tasks linked t the grade-level TEKS that measure student prgress n skills aligned with the academic grade-level cntent standards. Hwever, STAAR Alternate will incrprate a vertical alignment in the prgram s assessment tasks, and the high schl assessments will mve frm grade-level assessments t curse-based assessments. The new STAAR Alternate assessments will reflect the same increased rigr and fcus f the general and mdified assessments. 2

Fr eligible English language learners (ELLs) in grades 3-8 and high schl, plans are being made fr the develpment f cmputer-based linguistically accmmdated versins f STAAR, currently referred t as STAAR L. Spanish versins f STAAR will be implemented fr eligible ELLs in grades 3-5. TELPAS will be adjusted as needed t ensure a strng link between academic language prficiency as defined by TELPAS and academic achievement as defined by STAAR. TEA is evaluating all testing accmmdatins t determine which nes will cntinue in the STAAR prgram and which accmmdatins will be added r discntinued. With the STAAR prgram, TEA is cnsidering the eliminatin f the separate accmmdated frm and instead building in sme specific accmmdatins t the general STAAR assessments fr these students. Als, TEA is explring the pssibility f standardized ral administratins fr the STAAR prgram using an nline testing frmat. Perfrmance standards, test scre interpretatins, and the uses f STAAR assessment data will be supprted by validity evidence that will be btained by crrelating the STAAR assessments with ther tests r measures f student perfrmance. T prvide external validity evidence based n test cntent, an analysis will be cnducted t cmpare the assessment cntent standards n the STAAR assessments with ther natinally and internatinally administered assessments. STAAR significantly increases the number f testing days at the high schl level because f the increase in the number f assessments students will be taking. Currently n TAKS there is a ttal f 25 testing days, including exit level retest administratins. With three testing pprtunities each year (fall, winter, and spring), STAAR EOC will require up t 45 testing days when it is fully implemented. Students are allwed by statute t retest fr any reasn. TEA is cnsidering adpting plicies t limit the time a student spends taking a STAAR assessment n a given day. This cnsideratin is based n advice frm advisry cmmittees t align Texas testing plicies with ther state and natinal assessments and better prepare students fr timed tests such as SAT, ACT, and AP. Because f the number f high stakes EOC assessments that will be administered at the same time and the prvisin in statute t allw students t retest an EOC assessment fr any reasn, there will be much greater security challenges assciated with the STAAR prgram. Beginning in 2011-2012, TEA will annually use statistical analyses t identify irregular patterns f test answers that may indicate cheating t augment ther detectin methds already in use, such as multiple mark analysis. The use f statistical methds will take place within a larger investigative prcess that includes the cllectin f additinal evidence, such as lcally maintained seating charts, reprts f testing irregularities, and recrds f test security and administratin training fr campuses. Districts are required t prvide remediatin t any student wh fails a STAAR assessment, whether in grades 3 8 r high schl. This requirement has significant implicatins fr districts, especially at the high schl level. Students wh pass a curse but fail the assessment fr that curse may require additinal instructin in that curse even after they are n lnger enrlled. Delivering remediatin/instructin t students in these instances will present districts with bth scheduling and staffing challenges. Students, parents, and teachers will be able t access results thrugh a data prtal, a secure system that will prvide the ability t view reprts, track student prgress, prvide assessment data t institutins f higher educatin, and prvide infrmatin t the general public. 3

As Texas transitins its assessment prgram frm TAKS t STAAR, different measures f student prgress will likely be implemented. Texas will implement a multi-step prcess t identify the student prgress measures that will be used fr the STAAR assessment prgram. The verall field-test burden f STAAR n students and schl districts has been significantly reduced frm that f TAKS thrugh the embedding f field-test items whenever pssible beginning with peratinal assessments in 2012. In 2011, 2012, and 2013, selected test items representative f selected grades and subjects assessed n STAAR will be released. The first full release f primary test frms f STAAR will ccur in 2014. Accuntability A new accuntability system based n the STAAR grades 3 8 and STAAR EOC assessments will be develped during the 2011 2012 schl year and implemented in 2012-2013. Accuntability ratings will nt be released in 2011-2012 while student perfrmance standards are set n the STAAR and the new accuntability system is develped. Reprting in 2011-2012 will be mdified based n the availability f student perfrmance data. The new accuntability rating system will include the fllwing indicatrs and ther features. Student perfrmance n the STAAR grades 3 8 and EOC assessments, measured against bth student passing standards and cllege-readiness standards. Student prgress is als factred in, allwing mre students t be identified as meeting r prgressing tward meeting these standards. Accuntability standards defined by the cmmissiner f educatin fr the current year and prjected fr the next tw years. Standard fr the cllege-ready perfrmance indicatr increases s that by 2019-2020 Texas ranks in the tp ten amng states natinally n tw measures the percent cllege-ready and the percent graduating under the recmmended r advanced high schl prgram, with n gaps by race, ethnicity, r sciecnmic status. Drput rates (including district cmpletin rates) fr grades 9 thrugh 12 and high schl graduatin rates. Student grup perfrmance based n race/ethnicity and sciecnmic status is evaluated. Required Imprvement ver the prir year is a required feature. Average perfrmance f the last three years is a required feature. Perfrmance n 85 percent f the measures meeting the standard is an ptinal feature. Accuntability rating labels assign districts and campuses t ne f tw rating categries: Unacceptable and Acceptable. 4

Distinctin designatins will recgnize high perfrmance by students in academics and n brader indicatrs f excellence beynd results based n state assessments. Recgnized and Exemplary ratings are distinctin designatins fr meeting higher cllege- and careerready perfrmance standards, rather than higher perfrmance n the same indicatrs used fr accuntability ratings. Campus distinctin designatins will be awarded fr campuses in the tp 25 percent in annual imprvement, campuses in the tp 25 percent f thse demnstrating ability t clse perfrmance gaps, and fr academic perfrmance in ELA, mathematics, science, and scial studies. Campus distinctin designatins will als be awarded in fur new areas: fine arts, physical educatin, 21 st Century Wrkfrce develpment prgram, and secnd language acquisitin prgram. The intent f the accuntability develpment prcess is t design a new accuntability system rather than mdify the current system. The new system may lk very different frm the current state accuntability system. Fllwing are sme f the design ptins that will be explred fr the new system. Lngitudinal EOC perfrmance measure that tracks a chrt r class f high schl students as they prgress tward meeting the EOC graduatin requirement. Perfrmance Index that cmbines perfrmance acrss assessment perfrmance levels and subjects as well as grades, languages, and tests (regular and alternative). Accuntability develpment in 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 will include several crdinated effrts t simultaneusly develp the new state accuntability rating system, new federal AYP system, new state distinctin designatins, a new Perfrmance-Based Mnitring Analysis System (PBMAS), new state accuntability reprts, and pssibly new alternative educatin accuntability prcedures. Develpment f the new federal Adequate Yearly Prgress (AYP) system fr 2012 and beynd will take place during the 2011-2012 schl year as the new state accuntability system is develped. The primary cnsideratin that will guide develpment f the new AYP system will be alignment with the state accuntability system t the greatest extent pssible. TEA will mnitr the ESEA reauthrizatin prcess clsely but develpment f the new AYP system will begin and may be cmpleted under the requirements f the current ESEA. Phase-in f the new accuntability system will begin with the 2013 and 2014 accuntability ratings. Final decisins fr 2013 ratings will be released in spring 2013. Districts and campuses will nt receive advanced ntice f perfrmance under the new accuntability system. The 2013 ratings will be based n percent f students meeting the satisfactry student perfrmance standard. Cllege-ready perfrmance will be reprted in 2012-2013. The 2014 ratings will be based n cllege-ready perfrmance n STAAR as well as satisfactry perfrmance. Distinctin designatins fr which perfrmance n the cllege-ready indicatr is an eligibility requirement will be intrduced with the 2014 ratings. Campus and district ratings and distinctin designatins will be issued by August 8 beginning with the 2013 ratings. Ntificatin t districts and campuses previusly rated Unacceptable f a subsequent unacceptable rating will dne as early as pssible in 2013 and by June 15 beginning in 2014. 5