Bangor West Elementary School

Similar documents
Shelters Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

12-month Enrollment

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Educational Attainment

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Raw Data Files Instructions

Best Colleges Main Survey

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Hokulani Elementary School

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

El Toro Elementary School

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

University of Arizona

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Kahului Elementary School

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Data Diskette & CD ROM


NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

State of New Jersey

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Transportation Equity Analysis

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

Updated: December Educational Attainment

LIM College New York, NY

Trends & Issues Report

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Rural Education in Oregon

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Please complete these two forms, sign them, and return them to us in the enclosed pre paid envelope.

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

West Haven School District English Language Learners Program

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

Healthier US School Challenge : Smarter Lunchrooms

Application for Postgraduate Studies (Research)

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

46 Children s Defense Fund

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Application for Admission to Postgraduate Studies

District News. New Campus for Meridian Parent Partnership Program (MP3) Opening Fall 2017

Transcription:

Bangor West Elementary School 75 East Wilder Road Bay City, MI 48706-2361 Phone: (989) 684-3373 FAX: (989)686-8214 Michelle J. Goaley Debbie L. Craves Principal Secretary Dear Parents and Community Members: August 15 th, 2013 We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 2012-2013 educational progress for Bangor West Elementary School. The AER addresses the complex reporting information required by federal and state laws. The school s report contains information about student assessment, accountability and teacher quality. If you have any questions about the AER, please contact Michelle Goaley, principal, for assistance. The AER is available for you to review electronically by visiting the following web site www.bangorschools.org or you may review a copy from the principal s office at your child s school. The state has identified some schools with the status of Reward, Focus or Priority. A Reward school is one that is outperforming other schools in achievement, growth, or is performing better that other schools with a similar student population. A Focus school is one that has a large achievement gap in 30% of its student achievement scores. A Priority school is one whose achievement and growth is in the lowest 5% of all schools in the state. Our school has not been given one of these labels. The key challenges for our district overall are in the areas of math, science and writing. We have invested time in the past year modifying our math curriculum, implementing our reading intervention services, and adding new strategies and activities into our school improvement plan. Initiatives in the areas of math and writing instruction are being undertaken to close achievement gaps. We have also implemented standards-based report cards which reflect the Common Core State Standards. State law requires that we also report additional information: 1. Bangor West was built in 1955 and houses twelve general education classrooms, a special education resource classroom, an intervention classroom, and a multi-purpose room (lunchroom and gymnasium). The dome area of the building houses the upper elementary classrooms, a library area, a computer lab, an area for itinerant staff, and area for the Responsible Thinking Program, and areas for learning groups. 2. There are fourteen certified teachers on staff, a principal, an office secretary, a family services coordinator, and specialized teachers in the areas of health, music, physical education, and technology. We also have a library aide, part-time classroom aides in kindergarten and first grade, a part-time intervention aide staff of three aides that service second through fifth grades, maintenance staff, kitchen staff, playground and cafeteria aides, and a number of parent and community volunteers who can be seen daily assisting throughout the building in academic and non-academic functions. 3. Bangor West Elementary utilized the Michigan Curriculum Framework, Grade Level Content Expectations, and Common Core to establish the curriculum for each grade level. Implementation of curriculum is facilitated at the district level in coordination with the Bay-Arenac Intermediate School District. Information about the curriculum can be found on the Michigan Department of Education website, or by contacting the principal. 4. The MEAP test is given to all third, fourth and fifth grade students, unless an individualized educational plan indicates that the MI-Access or MEAP-Access is to be given as an alternative. At the third, fourth and fifth grade

level, all students are tested in English language arts and mathematics. At the fourth grade level, students are also tested in writing, while at the fifth grade the students are also tested in science. 5. At our fall parent-teacher conferences in 2012, 79% of parents were in attendance. At our spring 2013 conferences, 65% of parent were in attendance. At our fall parent-teacher conference in 2013, 71% of our parents were present. In addition to parent-teacher conferences, Bangor West Elementary School utilizes Skyward, a web-based communication tool, to provide parents with access to grades, calendars, progress and assignments on a daily basis. This has had an impact on the number of parents that choose to attend parentteacher conferences. 6. After school tutoring, summer enrichment, literacy support and math support were among the programs offered to struggling students. Most of those students experienced academic gains at a rate faster than the general population. 7. The Bangor West parent organization, Parents for Children, is a very active group and an integral part of our school community. Each year the group coordinates fund raisers, a book fair, bake sales, an annual Literacy Night, a Holiday Giving activity, and Elves Workshop Activity Day as well as meeting monthly to find ways to support and compliment the programs here at Bangor West. I am very pleased with the accomplishments of our students, staff, and parents. Sincerely, Michelle Goaley, Principal

Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Mathematics 3rd Grade All 2011-12 100% 36.3% 40.5% 60% < 10 60% 21.8% 18.2% Mathematics 3rd Grade All 2012-13 100% 40.9% 41.4% 46.3% < 10 44.4% 22.2%.5% Mathematics 3rd Grade African American Mathematics 3rd Grade African American 2011-12 < 10 14.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 18% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade Asian 2011-12 < 10 62.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade Asian 2012-13 < 10 65.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade Hispanic of Any Race Mathematics 3rd Grade Hispanic of Any Race 2011-12 < 10 23% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 25.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade White 2011-12 100% 42.3% 41.3% 62.7% < 10 62.7% 21.6% < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade White 2012-13 100% 47.4% 42.7% 49% < 10 46.9% 20.4% 30.6% Mathematics 3rd Grade Female 2011-12 100% 34.9% 43.7% 67.9% < 10 67.9% < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade Female 2012-13 100% 39.8% 40.7% 45.2% < 10 41.9% < 10 32.3% Mathematics 3rd Grade Male 2011-12 100% 37.6% 37% 51.9% < 10 51.9% < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade Male 2012-13 100% 42% 42.3% 47.8% < 10 47.8% < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade Economically Mathematics 3rd Grade Economically Mathematics 3rd Grade With Disabilities Page 1 of 2011-12 100% 23% 33.3% 60.9% < 10 60.9% < 10 < 10 2012-13 100% 26.8% 35% 41.9% < 10 38.7% < 10 32.3% 2011-12 < 10 18.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10

Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Mathematics 3rd Grade With Disabilities 2012-13 < 10 21.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade All 2011-12 100% 39.9%.5% 24% < 10 22% 34% 42% Mathematics 4th Grade All 2012-13 100% 46.1% 50% 65.4% < 10 59.6% < 10 19.2% Mathematics 4th Grade African American Mathematics 4th Grade African American Mathematics 4th Grade Hispanic of Any Race 2011-12 < 10 15.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 20% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2011-12 < 10 26.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade White 2011-12 100% 46.4% 34.6% 26.1% < 10 23.9% 34.8% 39.1% Mathematics 4th Grade White 2012-13 100% 53% 50.3% 66% < 10 60% < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade Female 2011-12 100% 38.5% 23.8% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 44% Mathematics 4th Grade Female 2012-13 100% 45.7% 47.1% 57.1% < 10 57.1% < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade Male 2011-12 100% 41.2% 37.2% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 40% Mathematics 4th Grade Male 2012-13 100% 46.4% 53.3% 75% < 10 62.5% < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade Economically Mathematics 4th Grade Economically Mathematics 4th Grade With Disabilities Mathematics 4th Grade With Disabilities 2011-12 100% 25.3% 27.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 100%.1% 43.5% 63.2% < 10 63.2% < 10 < 10 2011-12 < 10 18.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 23% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Page 2 of

Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Mathematics 5th Grade All 2011-12 100% 39.6% 33.3% 45.3% < 10 41.5% 35.8% 18.9% Mathematics 5th Grade All 2012-13 100% 45.7% 43.7% 40.4% < 10 36.5% 21.2% 38.5% Mathematics 5th Grade African American Mathematics 5th Grade African American 2011-12 < 10 17% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 20.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Asian 2011-12 < 10 71.4% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Mathematics 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race 2011-12 < 10 26.2% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade White 2011-12 100% 45.7%.1% 42.9% < 10 38.8% 38.8% < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade White 2012-13 100% 52.4% 44.4% 41.7% < 10 37.5% 22.9% 35.4% Mathematics 5th Grade Female 2011-12 100% 37.5% 36.7% 47.8% < 10 47.8% < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Female 2012-13 100% 43.9% 38% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 37% Mathematics 5th Grade Male 2011-12 100% 41.6% 30.1% 43.3% < 10 36.7% 36.7% < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Male 2012-13 100% 47.5% 48.8% 48% < 10 40% < 10 40% Mathematics 5th Grade Economically Mathematics 5th Grade Economically Mathematics 5th Grade With Disabilities 2011-12 100% 24.9% 30.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 100% 30.3% 41.3% 41.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 41.7% 2011-12 < 10 16% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Page 3 of

Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Mathematics 5th Grade With Disabilities 2012-13 < 10 19.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade All 2011-12 100% 62.4% 58.1% 67.3% < 10 61.8% 27.3% < 10 Reading 3rd Grade All 2012-13 100% 66.5% 73.5% 66.1% < 10 60.7% 25% < 10 Reading 3rd Grade African American Reading 3rd Grade African American 2011-12 < 10 38.4% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 44.8% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Asian 2011-12 < 10 73.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Asian 2012-13 < 10 79% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Hispanic of Any Race Reading 3rd Grade Hispanic of Any Race 2011-12 < 10 47.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 53.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade White 2011-12 100% 69.8% 59.7% 70.6% < 10 64.7% 25.5% < 10 Reading 3rd Grade White 2012-13 100% 73% 74.7% 68.6% < 10 62.7% 23.5% < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Female 2011-12 100% 65.9% 59.8% 64.3% < 10 57.1% < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Female 2012-13 100% 70.2% 73.9% 74.2% < 10 67.7% < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Male 2011-12 100% 59% 56.3% 70.4% < 10 66.7% < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Male 2012-13 100% 63% 73.1% 56% < 10 52% < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Economically Reading 3rd Grade Economically Page 4 of 2011-12 100% 49.5% 56.1% 69.6% < 10 60.9% < 10 < 10 2012-13 100% 53.8% 73.1% 69.7% < 10 60.6% < 10 < 10

Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Reading 3rd Grade With Disabilities Reading 3rd Grade With Disabilities 2011-12 < 10 34.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 37.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade All 2011-12 100% 67.7% 72.6% 74.5% < 10 64.7% 21.6% < 10 Reading 4th Grade All 2012-13 100% 68.1% 73% 82.4% < 10 82.4% < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade African American Reading 4th Grade African American Reading 4th Grade Hispanic of Any Race 2011-12 < 10 45.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 43% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2011-12 < 10 54.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade White 2011-12 100% 74.4% 73.1% 76.6% < 10 66% < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade White 2012-13 100% 75.1% 72.5% 82% < 10 82% < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade Female 2011-12 100% 71.7% 79.7% 81.5% < 10 74.1% < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade Female 2012-13 100% 71.1% 77.4% 81.5% < 10 81.5% < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade Male 2011-12 100% 63.7% 67.1% 66.7% < 10 54.2% < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade Male 2012-13 100% 65.1% 68% 83.3% < 10 83.3% < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade Economically Reading 4th Grade Economically Reading 4th Grade With Disabilities 2011-12 100% 55% 77.3% 87% < 10 73.9% < 10 < 10 2012-13 100% 55.1% 72.5% 88.9% < 10 88.9% < 10 < 10 2011-12 100% 35% 55% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Page 5 of

Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Reading 4th Grade With Disabilities 2012-13 < 10 38.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade All 2011-12 100% 68.8% 71.2% 83.6% < 10 74.5% < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade All 2012-13 100% 70.4% 77.6% 81.1% < 10 64.2% < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade African American Reading 5th Grade African American 2011-12 < 10 48.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 47.8% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Asian 2011-12 < 10 81.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Reading 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race 2011-12 < 10 57% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 58.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade White 2011-12 100% 74.8% 70.5% 84.3% < 10 74.5% < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade White 2012-13 100% 76.9% 78.1% 81.6% < 10 65.3% < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Female 2011-12 100% 71.7% 72% 83.3% < 10 70.8% < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Female 2012-13 100% 74.1% 79.7% 86.2% < 10 69% < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Male 2011-12 100% 65.9% 70.4% 83.9% < 10 77.4% < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Male 2012-13 100% 66.8% 75.6% 75% < 10 58.3% < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Economically Reading 5th Grade Economically 2011-12 100% 56.1% 67.7% 81.8% < 10 77.3% < 10 < 10 2012-13 100% 57.9% 79% 88% < 10 72% < 10 < 10 Page 6 of

Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Reading 5th Grade With Disabilities Reading 5th Grade With Disabilities 2011-12 < 10 34.2% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 36.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Science 5th Grade All 2011-12 100% 15.3% 12.3% 30.5% < 10 < 10 35.6% 33.9% Science 5th Grade All 2012-13 100% 13.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 33.3% 61.1% Science 5th Grade African American Science 5th Grade African American 2011-12 < 10 3.2% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 2.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Science 5th Grade Asian 2011-12 < 10 28.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Science 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race Science 5th Grade Hispanic of Any Race 2011-12 < 10 6.2% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 5.4% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Science 5th Grade White 2011-12 100% 18.9% 13.5% 33.3% < 10 < 10 37% 29.6% Science 5th Grade White 2012-13 100% 16% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 34% 60% Science 5th Grade Female 2011-12 100% 13.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 40% < 10 Science 5th Grade Female 2012-13 100% 11.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 41.4% 55.2% Science 5th Grade Male 2011-12 100% 17% 15.9% 32.4% < 10 < 10 32.4% 35.3% Science 5th Grade Male 2012-13 100% 14.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 68% Science 5th Grade Economically 2011-12 100% 7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 44% 44% Page 7 of

Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) Science 5th Grade Economically Science 5th Grade With Disabilities Science 5th Grade With Disabilities 2012-13 100% 5.8% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 44% 48% 2011-12 100% 5.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 4.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Page 8 of

Michigan Merit Examination (MME) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Advanced (Level 1) % (Level 2) % Partially (Level 3) % Not (Level 4) No Data to Display Page 9 of

Michigan Educational Assessment Program Access (MEAP - Access) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Exceeded % Met % Progressing Mathematics 3rd Grade All 2012-13 100% 63.7% 60% 100% < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade African American 2012-13 < 10 56.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade White 2012-13 < 10 68.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade Male 2012-13 100% 66.4% 60% 100% < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade Economically 2012-13 100% 62.4% 75% 100% < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade All 2011-12 100% 55.1% 83.3% 66.7% < 10 66.7% < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade All 2012-13 < 10 57.5% 80% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade White 2011-12 100% 61% 83.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade White 2012-13 < 10 63.6% 100% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade Female 2011-12 < 10 53.4% 100% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade Male 2011-12 < 10 58.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade Male 2012-13 < 10 57.9% 80% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 4th Grade Economically Mathematics 4th Grade Economically 2011-12 < 10 54.6% 80% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 55.5% 75% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade All 2011-12 100% 59.9% 75% 60% < 10 60% 40% Mathematics 5th Grade All 2012-13 < 10 58.5% 87.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade African American 2011-12 < 10 50.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade White 2011-12 100% 67.5% 66.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade White 2012-13 < 10 64% 87.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Page 10 of

Michigan Educational Assessment Program Access (MEAP - Access) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Exceeded % Met % Progressing Mathematics 5th Grade Female 2011-12 < 10 59.2% 75% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Female 2012-13 < 10 55.1% 80% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Male 2011-12 < 10 64% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Economically Mathematics 5th Grade Economically 2011-12 100% 59.3% 83.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2012-13 < 10 55.7% 85.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade All 2012-13 < 10 39.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade African American 2012-13 < 10 34.2% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade White 2012-13 < 10 42.8% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Male 2012-13 < 10 38.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Economically 2012-13 < 10 34.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade All 2011-12 100% 45.8% 37.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 100% Reading 4th Grade All 2012-13 < 10 46.3% 42.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade African American 2012-13 < 10 36.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade White 2011-12 < 10 50.6% 37.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade White 2012-13 < 10 51.4% 60% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade Female 2012-13 < 10 50.8% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade Male 2011-12 < 10 47.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade Male 2012-13 < 10 44% 50% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 4th Grade Economically Page 11 of 2011-12 < 10 44.5% 42.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10

Michigan Educational Assessment Program Access (MEAP - Access) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Exceeded % Met % Progressing Reading 4th Grade Economically 2012-13 < 10 43.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade All 2011-12 100% 55% 50% 25% 25% < 10 75% Reading 5th Grade All 2012-13 < 10 59.8% 66.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade African American 2011-12 < 10 47.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade White 2011-12 < 10 61.1% 66.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade White 2012-13 < 10 63.4% 62.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Female 2011-12 < 10 57.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Male 2011-12 < 10 56.8% 75% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Male 2012-13 < 10 57.4% 66.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Economically 2011-12 100% 52.8% 57.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Page 12 of

MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) Mathematics 3rd Grade All 2012-13 < 10 77.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade All 2012-13 < 10 81.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade White 2012-13 < 10 80.8% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade White 2012-13 < 10 84.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 3rd Grade Female 2012-13 < 10 77.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 3rd Grade Female 2012-13 < 10 81.7% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade All 2011-12 < 10 69.9% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade All 2011-12 < 10 81% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Science 5th Grade All 2011-12 < 10 45.4% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade White 2011-12 < 10 73.3% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade White 2011-12 < 10 82.5% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Science 5th Grade White 2011-12 < 10 49.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Female 2011-12 < 10 66.1% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Science 5th Grade Female 2011-12 < 10 41.4% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Male 2011-12 < 10 72.2% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Reading 5th Grade Male 2011-12 < 10 80.4% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Mathematics 5th Grade Economically Reading 5th Grade Economically Science 5th Grade Economically 2011-12 < 10 71.2% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2011-12 < 10 81.6% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 2011-12 < 10 46.4% < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 Page 13 of

MI-Access Supported Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) No Data to Display Page 14 of

MI-Access Participation Subject Grade Testing Group School Year % Tested State % District % School % % Surpassed (Level 1) % Attained (Level 2) % Emerging (Level 3) No Data to Display Page 15 of

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* All Statewide Mathematics 98.7% 58.2% Bottom 30% Statewide Mathematics 11.2% American Indian Statewide Mathematics 98.5% 48.4% African American Statewide Mathematics 96.9% 32.7% Asian Statewide Mathematics 99.4% 81.5% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Mathematics 98.6% 45.9% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Mathematics 97.4% 64.9% Two or More Races Statewide Mathematics 99.2% 55.9% White Statewide Mathematics 99.2% 64.4% Economically Statewide Mathematics 98.2% 43.7% English Language Learners Statewide Mathematics 98.9% 36.9% With Disabilities Statewide Mathematics 97.8% 32.5% All District Mathematics 96.8% 61.3% Bottom 30% District Mathematics 11.4% American Indian District Mathematics African American District Mathematics 93.9% < 30 Asian District Mathematics < 30 < 30 Hispanic of Any Race District Mathematics 96.9% 59% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District Mathematics Two or More Races District Mathematics < 30 < 30 White District Mathematics 96.8% 61.7% Economically District Mathematics 95.7% 58.6% English Language Learners District Mathematics < 30 < 30 With Disabilities District Mathematics 91.7% 43.5% All School Mathematics 98.8% 79.4% Bottom 30% School Mathematics 33.3% African American School Mathematics < 30 < 30 Asian School Mathematics < 30 < 30 Hispanic of Any Race School Mathematics < 30 < 30 Two or More Races School Mathematics < 30 Page 16 of

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* White School Mathematics 98.7% 80.3% Economically School Mathematics 97.6% 77.7% English Language Learners School Mathematics < 30 With Disabilities School Mathematics < 30 < 30 All Statewide Reading 99% 83.1% Bottom 30% Statewide Reading 51.3% American Indian Statewide Reading 98.8% 79.7% African American Statewide Reading 97.3% 67.9% Asian Statewide Reading 100.3% 90.1% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Reading 99.2% 77% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Reading 97.4% 85.7% Two or More Races Statewide Reading 99.4% 83.6% White Statewide Reading 99.4% 86.9% Economically Statewide Reading 98.6% 74.8% English Language Learners Statewide Reading 100.5% 62.4% With Disabilities Statewide Reading 98.1% 51.8% All District Reading 97% 85.9% Bottom 30% District Reading 59.5% American Indian District Reading African American District Reading 93.9% < 30 Asian District Reading < 30 < 30 Hispanic of Any Race District Reading 96.9% 82% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District Reading Two or More Races District Reading < 30 < 30 White District Reading 97% 86.6% Economically District Reading 96% 83.3% English Language Learners District Reading < 30 < 30 With Disabilities District Reading 92.2% 58.8% All School Reading 98.8% 88.1% Bottom 30% School Reading 66.7% Page 17 of

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* African American School Reading < 30 < 30 Asian School Reading < 30 < 30 Hispanic of Any Race School Reading < 30 < 30 Two or More Races School Reading < 30 White School Reading 98.7% 89.2% Economically School Reading 97.6% 86.3% English Language Learners School Reading < 30 With Disabilities School Reading < 30 66.7% All Statewide Science 97.9% 38.6% Bottom 30% Statewide Science 1% American Indian Statewide Science 97.5% 29.4% African American Statewide Science 94.8% 12.8% Asian Statewide Science 99.1% 57.4% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Science 97.9% 22.9% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Science 93.7% 49.2% Two or More Races Statewide Science 98.7% 35.7% White Statewide Science 98.7% 45% Economically Statewide Science 97% 22.9% English Language Learners Statewide Science 98% 7.6% With Disabilities Statewide Science 96.5% 15.1% All District Science 93.7% 32.4% Bottom 30% District Science 0% American Indian District Science African American District Science < 30 < 30 Asian District Science < 30 < 30 Hispanic of Any Race District Science < 30 < 30 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District Science Two or More Races District Science < 30 < 30 White District Science 93.8% 33.9% Economically District Science 91% 26.4% Page 18 of

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* English Language Learners District Science With Disabilities District Science 82.4% 13.6% All School Science 98.2% 16.7% Bottom 30% School Science < 30 African American School Science < 30 < 30 Hispanic of Any Race School Science < 30 < 30 White School Science 98% 18.2% Economically School Science < 30 < 30 With Disabilities School Science < 30 < 30 All Statewide Social Studies 96.7% 57.5% Bottom 30% Statewide Social Studies 8.8% American Indian Statewide Social Studies 95.9% 52.3% African American Statewide Social Studies 92.4% 27.9% Asian Statewide Social Studies 99% 73.6% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Social Studies 96.1% 43% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Social Studies 93.2% 59.7% Two or More Races Statewide Social Studies 97.6% 53.5% White Statewide Social Studies 98% 64.7% Economically Statewide Social Studies 95.1% 40.3% English Language Learners Statewide Social Studies 96.4% 19.6% With Disabilities Statewide Social Studies 91.9% 22.3% All District Social Studies 94.2% 61.1% Bottom 30% District Social Studies 3.9% American Indian District Social Studies African American District Social Studies < 30 < 30 Asian District Social Studies < 30 < 30 Hispanic of Any Race District Social Studies < 30 < 30 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District Social Studies Two or More Races District Social Studies < 30 < 30 White District Social Studies 94.1% 61.9% Page 19 of

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* Economically District Social Studies 91.1% 49.1% English Language Learners District Social Studies With Disabilities District Social Studies 83.1% 27.5% All Statewide Writing 98.2% 69.4% Bottom 30% Statewide Writing 21.9% American Indian Statewide Writing 97.7% 61.6% African American Statewide Writing 95.6% 48.8% Asian Statewide Writing 98.9% 82.9% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide Writing 98% 59.7% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide Writing 94.5% 74.4% Two or More Races Statewide Writing 98.9% 68.5% White Statewide Writing 98.9% 74.3% Economically Statewide Writing 97.3% 55.7% English Language Learners Statewide Writing 97.3% 42.1% With Disabilities Statewide Writing 96.6% 27.9% All District Writing 93.7% 63.6% Bottom 30% District Writing 0% American Indian District Writing African American District Writing < 30 < 30 Asian District Writing < 30 < 30 Hispanic of Any Race District Writing < 30 < 30 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander District Writing Two or More Races District Writing < 30 < 30 White District Writing 93.7% 63.9% Economically District Writing 91.2% 56.4% English Language Learners District Writing < 30 With Disabilities District Writing 84.7% 27.9% All School Writing 98.2% 69.8% Bottom 30% School Writing < 30 African American School Writing < 30 < 30 Page 20 of

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Location Subject % Tested Total(Goal 95%) % for Accountability* Asian School Writing < 30 White School Writing 98.1% 74% Economically School Writing < 30 < 30 English Language Learners School Writing < 30 With Disabilities School Writing < 30 < 30 Page 21 of

Accountability Details Graduation Data Testing Group Location Accountability Scorecard Completion Rate (High Schools only) (Goal 80%) All Statewide 76.2% American Indian Statewide 66.4% African American Statewide 59.9% Asian Statewide 87.4% Hispanic of Any Race Statewide 64.3% Migrant Statewide 68.3% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Statewide 73.2% Two or More Races Statewide 73.5% White Statewide 81.5% Female Statewide 80.8% Male Statewide 72% Economically Statewide 64% English Language Learners Statewide 63.1% With Disabilities Statewide 53.5% Homeless Statewide 53.8% All District 82.6% White District 82.3% Economically District 76.1% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. Page 22 of

Accountability Details Attendance Data Testing Group Location Attendance Rate (Goal 90%) All Statewide 94% All District 95% All School 95% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. Page 23 of

Accountability Status District Data District Name Reading Status Reading Score Writing Status Writing Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score No Data to Display Page 24 of

Accountability Status School Data District Name School Name Title 1 Status Reading Status Reading Score Writing Status Writing Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score Bangor Township Schools Bangor West Central School Green 2 Green 2 Green 2 Green 2 Green 2 Yellow 32 Page 25 of

Teacher Quality - Qualification Other B.A. M.A. P.H.D. Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School 0 8 15 0 Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Teacher Quality - Class School Aggregate High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools Percentage of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Teacher Quality - Provisional Certification Percent Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School with Emergency Certification 0% Page 26 of

NAEP Grade 4 Math Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All 100 22 43 30 5 Male Female 50 50 21 22 42 45 29 6 4 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 43 56 35 11 47 41 17 41 1 8 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races 71 16 6 3 2 14 53 7 23 45 39 48 22 50 36 8 19 45 21 5 0 2 26 6 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 13 87 50 18 37 44 13 32 1 5 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 4 96 47 21 41 44 11 1 5 Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011 Mathematics Achievement. Page 27 of

NAEP Grade 8 Math Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All 100 29 40 25 6 Male Female 51 49 28 30 39 41 26 24 7 5 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 42 58 45 18 39 41 15 32 2 9 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races 74 16 4 3 1 2 22 66 26 13 43 26 41 25 29 7 18 6 0 5 32 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 12 88 70 25 23 41 5 27 1 6 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 2 98 57 29 27 40 7 25 10 6 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011 Mathematics Achievement. Page 28 of

NAEP Grade 4 Reading Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All 100 34 34 25 6 Male Female 50 50 38 33 36 24 26 6 7 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 45 55 51 21 32 36 15 33 2 10 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races 70 17 6 3 0 2 26 67 51 19 36 37 24 29 33 30 7 17 33 19 7 1 3 15 14 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 13 87 73 30 17 36 8 27 2 7 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 3 97 67 33 26 35 7 25 0 7 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2011 Reading Assessment. Page 29 of

NAEP Grade 8 Reading Percent of Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Percent Advanced All 100 23 45 29 3 Male Female 50 50 28 18 47 43 24 35 2 4 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 42 58 35 14 46 44 18 37 0 4 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races 74 16 4 3 1 1 18 46 25 19 46 43 50 27 33 10 25 39 3 0 1 14 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 12 88 67 19 27 46 6 0 3 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 2 98 52 22 40 45 8 30 0 3 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2011 Reading Assessment. Page 30 of

NAEP Participation Data Grade Subject Participation Rate for with Disabilities Standard Error Participation Rate for Limited English Standard Error 4 Math Reading 85 75 2.0 3.1 73 93 3.3 2.4 8 Math Reading 73 63 2.5 3.3 83 79 4.7 4.5 Page of