Diversity in Osteopathic Medical School Applicants, Matriculants, and Enrollment

Similar documents
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Shelters Elementary School

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

12-month Enrollment

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

University of Arizona

Educational Attainment

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Legacy of NAACP Salary equalization suits.

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

PROGRAM REVIEW A PROCESS FOR SELF-EVALUATION AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT HOTEL/RESTAURANT/HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT. 1 P a g e

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Diversity Registered Student Organizations

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

Raw Data Files Instructions

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

46 Children s Defense Fund

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

The Unequal Distribution of Economic Education: A Report on the Race, Ethnicity, and Gender of Economics Majors at US Colleges and Universities

Dental schools continue to face major challenges

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Transforming Admissions. A Practical Guide to Fostering Student Diversity in Dental Schools

ISSUES IN DIVERSITY AT CHRISTIAN EVANGELICAL HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTES:

Transportation Equity Analysis

Pathways to Health Professions of the Future

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development


LIM College New York, NY

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

HHS FALL FACULTY MEETING COLLEGE UPDATE

Data Diskette & CD ROM

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

Networks and the Diffusion of Cutting-Edge Teaching and Learning Knowledge in Sociology

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Best Colleges Main Survey

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

HIGH SCHOOL PREP PROGRAM APPLICATION For students currently in 7th grade

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Quantitative Study with Prospective Students: Final Report. for. Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington, Illinois

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Kahului Elementary School

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

A Diverse Student Body

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

Transcription:

Diversity in Osteopathic Medical School,, and Enrollment Prepared by the Research Department American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine 2017

The tables and graphs below display trends in osteopathic medical school applicants, matriculants, and enrollment with regard to gender and race/ethnicity. Applicant and matriculant data were compiled from the information entered by applicants into the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine Application Service (AACOMAS) application along with information from the colleges of osteopathic medicine (COMs). Enrollment data were provided by the COMs in the Annual Osteopathic Medical School Questionnaire. Noteworthy findings on diversity in osteopathic medical school applicants, matriculants, first year enrollment, and total enrollment are below. Race and Ethnicity: The number and proportion of underrepresented minority* (URM) applicants and first year enrollees to COMs is increasing. Even though more URMs are applying to COMs, URM total enrollment remains relatively stagnant. In addition, the proportion of URM applicants to matriculants continues to remain lower than their non-underrepresented minority counterparts. Some key findings on race/ethnicity trends from 2009-10 to 2016-17 include: The percentage of URMs applying to an osteopathic medical school has increased by 3.9 percent (Table 1). The percentage of URMs matriculating to an osteopathic medical school has increased by 1.5 percent (Table 1). The proportion of URM applicants that matriculated to an osteopathic medical school decreased by 3.4 percent (Figure 7). ǂ The percentage of URMs enrolled in their first year of osteopathic medical school has increased by 2.0 percent (Table 3). The percentage of URMs enrolled in an osteopathic medical school has increased by 0.8 percent (Table 3). Gender: The percentage of females matriculating and enrolled in osteopathic medical schools has decreased since 2009-10. In addition, the proportion of female applicants to matriculants continues to remain lower than their male counterparts. Some important findings on gender trends from 2009-10 to 2016-17 include: The percentage of females applying to an osteopathic medical school has increased by 0.1 percent (Table 2). The percentage of females matriculating to an osteopathic medical school has decreased by 1.1 percent (Table 2). The percentage of females enrolled in their first year of osteopathic medical school has decreased by 1.0 percent (Table 4). The percentage of females enrolled in an osteopathic medical school has decreased by 3.0 percent (Table 4). Race/Ethnicity by Gender: and matriculants by race/ethnicity and gender reveal some interesting trends. A complete breakout of all race/ethnicity categories by gender may be found in Figures 5 and 5a. Some key findings on race/ethnicity by gender from 2009-10 to 2016-17 are as follows: The percentage of female URMs applying to an osteopathic medical school increased by 2.0 (Figure 2). The percentage of male URMs applying to an osteopathic medical school increased by 1.9 (Figure 2). The percentage of female URMs matriculating to an osteopathic medical school has increased by 0.9 percent (Figure 4). The percentage of male URMs matriculating to an osteopathic medical school has increased by 0.7 percent (Figure 4). The proportion of female URMs who applied and matriculated to an osteopathic medical school decreased by 4.1 percent (Figure 7). ǂ The proportion of male URMs who applied and matriculated to an osteopathic medical school decreased by 7.4 percent (Figure 7). ǂ *Underrepresented minorities (URM) include Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, Black/African American, Native American/Alaska Native, and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Non-underrepresented minorities include Asian Americans, Foreign, Whites, Undisclosed, and those reporting Multiple Races (except when Hispanic is selected). ǂ: The COMs do not report offers made to AACOMAS applicants. As a result, we can only report the number of matriculants. Note: The University of North Texas Health Sciences Center at Fort Worth/Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine and NYIT-COM's émigré program applicants and matriculants are not included in this analysis because the data are not part of the AACOMAS database. UNTHSC/TCOM receives its applications through the Texas Medical and Dental School Application Service. Note: Tables with data on gender by race/ethnicity do not include those reporting an undisclosed gender. Note: Undisclosed responses are included in the percent underrepresented minority denominator for tables on enrollment. For tables with applicant/matriculant data, undisclosed responses are not included. Future reporting of applicants/matriculants will include undisclosed in the denominator in order to standardize this measure. 1 - Intro

Table 1: AACOMAS and Race/Ethnicity % who Matriculated Non-URM URM Non-URM URM Non-URM URM Year # % # % # % # % % % 2016-17 17,616 85.0% 3,104 15.0% 6,201 91.5% 577 8.5% 35.2% 18.6% 2015-16 17,669 86.4% 2,778 13.6% 6,091 91.1% 592 8.9% 34.5% 21.3% 2014-15 15,656 87.2% 2,288 12.8% 5,933 91.8% 532 8.2% 37.9% 23.3% 2013-14 14,521 88.3% 1,933 11.7% 5,688 92.7% 447 7.3% 39.2% 23.1% 2012-13 13,263 88.7% 1,682 11.3% 5,108 93.5% 356 6.5% 38.5% 21.2% 2011-12 12,547 89.1% 1,540 10.9% 4,993 93.1% 370 6.9% 39.8% 24.0% 2010-11 11,747 89.4% 1,400 10.6% 4,705 93.5% 326 6.5% 40.1% 23.3% 2009-10 11,213 88.9% 1,404 11.1% 4,509 93.0% 337 7.0% 40.2% 24.0% Table 2: AACOMAS and Gender % who Matriculated Male Female Male Female Male Female Year # % # % # % # % % % 2016-17 10,640 51.5% 10,031 48.5% 3,661 54.1% 3,102 45.9% 34.4% 30.9% 2015-16 10,816 53.5% 9,415 46.5% 3,683 55.6% 2,937 44.4% 34.1% 31.2% 2014-15 9,564 53.9% 8,175 46.1% 3,636 56.8% 2,763 43.2% 38.0% 33.8% 2013-14 8,708 53.6% 7,545 46.4% 3,362 55.6% 2,690 44.4% 38.6% 35.7% 2012-13 7,936 53.6% 6,860 46.4% 3,020 55.8% 2,395 44.2% 38.1% 34.9% 2011-12 7,487 53.2% 6,597 46.8% 2,971 55.9% 2,346 44.1% 39.7% 35.6% 2010-11 6,869 52.3% 6,277 47.7% 2,718 54.0% 2,313 46.0% 39.6% 36.8% 2009-10 6,507 51.6% 6,101 48.4% 2,583 53.0% 2,289 47.0% 39.7% 37.5% 2 - Tables

Table 3: First Year and Total Enrollment Race/Ethnicity First-Year Enrollment Total Enrollment Non-URM URM Non-URM URM Year # % # % # % # % 2016-17 6,900 91.1% 675 8.9% 25,153 91.5% 2,332 8.5% 2015-16 6,570 91.0% 649 9.0% 23,770 91.9% 2,106 8.1% 2014-15 6,413 91.5% 599 8.5% 22,652 92.2% 1,912 7.8% 2013-14 6,099 91.9% 537 8.1% 21,345 92.5% 1,726 7.5% 2012-13 5,556 92.8% 430 7.2% 20,181 92.8% 1,560 7.2% 2011-12 5,366 92.7% 422 7.3% 19,148 92.7% 1,515 7.3% 2010-11 5,039 92.8% 389 7.2% 17,912 92.2% 1,515 7.8% 2009-10 4,868 93.1% 359 6.9% 16,755 92.3% 1,388 7.7% Table 4: First Year and Total Enrollment Gender First-Year Enrollment Total Enrollment Male Female Male Female Year # % # % # % # % 2016-17 4,104 54.2% 3,471 45.8% 15,206 55.3% 12,279 44.7% 2015-16 4,023 55.7% 3,196 44.3% 14,393 55.6% 11,483 44.4% 2014-15 3,995 57.0% 3,017 43.0% 13,661 55.6% 10,903 44.4% 2013-14 3,703 55.8% 2,933 44.2% 12,670 54.9% 10,401 45.1% 2012-13 3,325 55.5% 2,661 44.5% 11,818 54.4% 9,923 45.6% 2011-12 3,192 55.1% 2,596 44.9% 11,117 53.8% 9,546 46.2% 2010-11 2,918 53.8% 2,510 46.2% 10,259 52.8% 9,168 47.2% 2009-10 2,781 53.2% 2,446 46.8% 9,497 52.3% 8,646 47.7% 3 - Tables

Table 5: AACOMAS and Race and Ethnicity by Gender Note: Tables with data on gender by race/ethnicity do not include those reporting an undisclosed gender. % who Matriculated Academic Year Race/Ethnicity Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total 2016-17 Asian American 2,264 2,292 4,556 809 728 1,537 35.7% 31.8% 33.7% 2016-17 Black/African American 458 868 1,326 61 122 183 13.3% 14.1% 13.8% 2016-17 Foreign 185 181 366 42 43 85 22.7% 23.8% 23.2% 2016-17 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 7 13 20 1 2 3 14.3% 15.4% 15.0% 2016-17 Hispanic/Latino 814 884 1,698 193 188 381 23.7% 21.3% 22.4% 2016-17 Multiple Races 350 366 716 117 103 220 33.4% 28.1% 30.7% 2016-17 Native American/Alaska Native 30 24 54 5 4 9 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 2016-17 White 5,858 4,762 10,620 2,231 1,698 3,929 38.1% 35.7% 37.0% 2016-17 Undisclosed 674 641 1,315 202 214 416 30.0% 33.4% 31.6% 2016-17 Total 10,640 10,031 20,671 3,661 3,102 6,763 34.4% 30.9% 32.7% 2016-17 Non-URM 9,331 8,242 17,573 3,401 2,786 6,187 36.4% 33.8% 35.2% 2016-17 URM 1,309 1,789 3,098 260 316 576 19.9% 17.7% 18.6% 2015-16 Asian American 2,347 2,375 4,722 718 708 1,426 30.6% 29.8% 30.2% 2015-16 Black/African American 423 724 1,147 80 119 199 18.9% 16.4% 17.3% 2015-16 Foreign 194 183 377 50 46 96 25.8% 25.1% 25.5% 2015-16 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 7 4 11 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2015-16 Hispanic/Latino 789 800 1,589 212 174 386 26.9% 21.8% 24.3% 2015-16 Multiple Races 394 356 750 124 96 220 31.5% 27.0% 29.3% 2015-16 Native American/Alaska Native 19 11 30 4 3 7 21.1% 27.3% 23.3% 2015-16 White 6,361 4,669 11,030 2,404 1,693 4,097 37.8% 36.3% 37.1% 2015-16 Undisclosed 282 293 575 91 98 189 32.3% 33.4% 32.9% 2015-16 Total 10,816 9,415 20,231 3,683 2,937 6,620 34.1% 31.2% 32.7% 2015-16 Non-URM 9,578 7,876 17,454 3,387 2,641 6,028 35.4% 33.5% 34.5% 2015-16 URM 1,238 1,539 2,777 296 296 592 23.9% 19.2% 21.3% 4 - Tables

% who Matriculated Academic Year Race/Ethnicity Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total 2014-15 Asian American 1,929 1,891 3,820 709 631 1,340 36.8% 33.4% 35.1% 2014-15 Black/African American 371 561 932 73 96 169 19.7% 17.1% 18.1% 2014-15 Foreign 148 147 295 42 35 77 28.4% 23.8% 26.1% 2014-15 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 15 7 22 7 1 8 46.7% 14.3% 36.4% 2014-15 Hispanic/Latino 684 608 1,292 189 152 341 27.6% 25.0% 26.4% 2014-15 Multiple Races 330 341 671 113 96 209 34.2% 28.2% 31.1% 2014-15 Native American/Alaska Native 23 16 39 6 7 13 26.1% 43.8% 33.3% 2014-15 White 5,744 4,305 10,049 2,365 1,622 3,987 41.2% 37.7% 39.7% 2014-15 Undisclosed 320 299 619 132 123 255 41.3% 41.1% 41.2% 2014-15 Total 9,564 8,175 17,739 3,636 2,763 6,399 38.0% 33.8% 36.1% 2014-15 Non-URM 8,471 6,983 15,454 3,361 2,507 5,868 39.7% 35.9% 38.0% 2014-15 URM 1,093 1,192 2,285 275 256 531 25.2% 21.5% 23.2% 2013-14 Asian American 1,780 1,702 3,482 660 598 1,258 37.1% 35.1% 36.1% 2013-14 Black/African American 301 544 845 62 101 163 20.6% 18.6% 19.3% 2013-14 Foreign 121 116 237 46 32 78 38.0% 27.6% 32.9% 2013-14 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 12 11 23 1 2 3 8.3% 18.2% 13.0% 2013-14 Hispanic/Latino 524 502 1,026 145 122 267 27.7% 24.3% 26.0% 2013-14 Multiple Races 303 266 569 97 85 182 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 2013-14 Native American/Alaska Native 21 17 38 5 7 12 23.8% 41.2% 31.6% 2013-14 White 5,334 4,106 9,440 2,219 1,650 3,869 41.6% 40.2% 41.0% 2013-14 Undisclosed 312 281 593 127 93 220 40.7% 33.1% 37.1% 2013-14 Total 8,708 7,545 16,253 3,362 2,690 6,052 38.6% 35.7% 37.2% 2013-14 Non-URM 7,850 6,471 14,321 3,149 2,458 5,607 40.1% 38.0% 39.2% 2013-14 URM 858 1,074 1,932 213 232 445 24.8% 21.6% 23.0% 5 - Tables

% who Matriculated Academic Year Race/Ethnicity Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total 2012-13 Asian American 1,587 1,542 3,129 577 485 1,062 36.4% 31.5% 33.9% 2012-13 Black/African American 285 442 727 61 71 132 21.4% 16.1% 18.2% 2012-13 Foreign 108 111 219 30 30 60 27.8% 27.0% 27.4% 2012-13 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 4 1 5 3 0 3 75.0% 0.0% 60.0% 2012-13 Hispanic/Latino 459 445 904 105 105 210 22.9% 23.6% 23.2% 2012-13 Multiple Races 256 240 496 66 83 149 25.8% 34.6% 30.0% 2012-13 Native American/Alaska Native 25 21 46 6 5 11 24.0% 23.8% 23.9% 2012-13 White 4,933 3,807 8,740 2,067 1,526 3,593 41.9% 40.1% 41.1% 2012-13 Undisclosed 279 251 530 105 90 195 37.6% 35.9% 36.8% 2012-13 Total 7,936 6,860 14,796 3,020 2,395 5,415 38.1% 34.9% 36.6% 2012-13 Non-URM 7,163 5,951 13,114 2,845 2,214 5,059 39.7% 37.2% 38.6% 2012-13 URM 773 909 1,682 175 181 356 22.6% 19.9% 21.2% 2011-12 Asian American 1,425 1,415 2,840 520 435 955 36.5% 30.7% 33.6% 2011-12 Black/African American 275 409 684 52 82 134 18.9% 20.0% 19.6% 2011-12 Foreign 124 97 221 28 25 53 22.6% 25.8% 24.0% 2011-12 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 10 6 16 2 1 3 20.0% 16.7% 18.8% 2011-12 Hispanic/Latino 400 400 800 128 95 223 32.0% 23.8% 27.9% 2011-12 Multiple Races 243 236 479 90 76 166 37.0% 32.2% 34.7% 2011-12 Native American/Alaska Native 24 16 40 7 3 10 29.2% 18.8% 25.0% 2011-12 White 4,627 3,685 8,312 2,034 1,517 3,551 44.0% 41.2% 42.7% 2011-12 Undisclosed 359 333 692 110 112 222 30.6% 33.6% 32.1% 2011-12 Total 7,487 6,597 14,084 2,971 2,346 5,317 39.7% 35.6% 37.8% 2011-12 Non-URM 6,778 5,766 12,544 2,782 2,165 4,947 41.0% 37.5% 39.4% 2011-12 URM 709 831 1,540 189 181 370 26.7% 21.8% 24.0% 6 - Tables

% who Matriculated Academic Year Race/Ethnicity Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total 2010-11 Asian American 1,278 1,292 2,570 525 490 1,015 41.1% 37.9% 39.5% 2010-11 Black/African American 224 403 627 36 85 121 16.1% 21.1% 19.3% 2010-11 Foreign 101 74 175 20 12 32 19.8% 16.2% 18.3% 2010-11 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 5 6 11 1 0 1 20.0% 0.0% 9.1% 2010-11 Hispanic/Latino 370 352 722 99 94 193 26.8% 26.7% 26.7% 2010-11 Multiple Races 200 223 423 84 81 165 42.0% 36.3% 39.0% 2010-11 Native American/Alaska Native 27 13 40 6 5 11 22.2% 38.5% 27.5% 2010-11 White 4,285 3,547 7,832 1,901 1,505 3,406 44.4% 42.4% 43.5% 2010-11 Undisclosed 379 367 747 46 41 87 12.1% 11.2% 11.6% 2010-11 Total 6,869 6,277 13,147 2,718 2,313 5,031 39.6% 36.8% 38.3% 2010-11 Non-URM 6,243 5,503 11,747 2,576 2,129 4,705 41.3% 38.7% 40.1% 2010-11 URM 626 774 1,400 142 184 326 22.7% 23.8% 23.3% 2009-10 Asian American 1,184 1,241 2,425 442 397 839 37.3% 32.0% 34.6% 2009-10 Black/African American 204 421 626 41 83 124 20.1% 19.7% 19.8% 2009-10 Foreign 72 70 143 19 18 37 26.4% 25.7% 25.9% 2009-10 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 6 9 15 3 2 5 50.0% 22.2% 33.3% 2009-10 Hispanic/Latino 328 392 720 103 97 200 31.4% 24.7% 27.8% 2009-10 Multiple Races 169 176 345 44 65 109 26.0% 36.9% 31.6% 2009-10 Native American/Alaska Native 18 25 43 5 3 8 27.8% 12.0% 18.6% 2009-10 White 4,024 3,327 7,351 1,715 1,407 3,122 42.6% 42.3% 42.5% 2009-10 Undisclosed 502 440 949 205 197 402 40.8% 44.8% 42.4% 2009-10 Total 6,507 6,101 12,617 2,577 2,269 4,846 39.6% 37.2% 38.4% 2009-10 Non-URM 5,951 5,254 11,213 2,425 2,084 4,509 40.7% 39.7% 40.2% 2009-10 URM 556 847 1,404 152 185 337 27.3% 21.8% 24.0% 7 - Tables

Table 5a: AACOMAS and Percent Race and Ethnicity by Gender Note: Tables with data on gender by race/ethnicity do not include those reporting an undisclosed gender. Academic Year Race/Ethnicity Male Female Total Male Female Total 2016-17 Asian American 11.0% 11.1% 22.0% 12.0% 10.8% 22.7% 2016-17 Black/African American 2.2% 4.2% 6.4% 0.9% 1.8% 2.7% 2016-17 Foreign 0.9% 0.9% 1.8% 0.6% 0.6% 1.3% 2016-17 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2016-17 Hispanic/Latino 3.9% 4.3% 8.2% 2.9% 2.8% 5.6% 2016-17 Multiple Races 1.7% 1.8% 3.5% 1.7% 1.5% 3.3% 2016-17 Native American/Alaska Native 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 2016-17 White 28.3% 23.0% 51.4% 33.0% 25.1% 58.1% 2016-17 Undisclosed 3.3% 3.1% 6.4% 3.0% 3.2% 6.2% 2016-17 Total 51.5% 48.5% 100.0% 54.1% 45.9% 100.0% 2016-17 Non-URM 45.1% 39.9% 85.0% 50.3% 41.2% 91.5% 2016-17 URM 6.3% 8.7% 15.0% 3.8% 4.7% 8.5% 2015-16 Asian American 11.6% 11.7% 23.3% 10.8% 10.7% 21.5% 2015-16 Black/African American 2.1% 3.6% 5.7% 1.2% 1.8% 3.0% 2015-16 Foreign 1.0% 0.9% 1.9% 0.8% 0.7% 1.5% 2015-16 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2015-16 Hispanic/Latino 3.9% 4.0% 7.9% 3.2% 2.6% 5.8% 2015-16 Multiple Races 1.9% 1.8% 3.7% 1.9% 1.5% 3.3% 2015-16 Native American/Alaska Native 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 2015-16 White 31.4% 23.1% 54.5% 36.3% 25.6% 61.9% 2015-16 Undisclosed 1.4% 1.4% 2.8% 1.4% 1.5% 2.9% 2015-16 Total 53.5% 46.5% 100.0% 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% 2015-16 Non-URM 47.3% 38.9% 86.3% 51.2% 39.9% 91.1% 2015-16 URM 6.1% 7.6% 13.7% 4.5% 4.5% 8.9% 8 - Tables

Academic Year Race/Ethnicity Male Female Total Male Female Total 2014-15 Asian American 10.9% 10.7% 21.5% 11.1% 9.9% 20.9% 2014-15 Black/African American 2.1% 3.2% 5.3% 1.1% 1.5% 2.6% 2014-15 Foreign 0.8% 0.8% 1.7% 0.7% 0.5% 1.2% 2014-15 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 2014-15 Hispanic/Latino 3.9% 3.4% 7.3% 3.0% 2.4% 5.3% 2014-15 Multiple Races 1.9% 1.9% 3.8% 1.8% 1.5% 3.3% 2014-15 Native American/Alaska Native 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 2014-15 White 32.4% 24.3% 56.6% 37.0% 25.3% 62.3% 2014-15 Undisclosed 1.8% 1.7% 3.5% 2.1% 1.9% 4.0% 2014-15 Total 53.9% 46.1% 100.0% 56.8% 43.2% 100.0% 2014-15 Non-URM 47.8% 39.4% 87.1% 52.5% 39.2% 91.7% 2014-15 URM 6.2% 6.7% 12.9% 4.3% 4.0% 8.3% 2013-14 Asian American 11.0% 10.5% 21.4% 10.9% 9.9% 20.8% 2013-14 Black/African American 1.9% 3.3% 5.2% 1.0% 1.7% 2.7% 2013-14 Foreign 0.7% 0.7% 1.5% 0.8% 0.5% 1.3% 2013-14 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2013-14 Hispanic/Latino 3.2% 3.1% 6.3% 2.4% 2.0% 4.4% 2013-14 Multiple Races 1.9% 1.6% 3.5% 1.6% 1.4% 3.0% 2013-14 Native American/Alaska Native 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 2013-14 White 32.8% 25.3% 58.1% 36.7% 27.3% 63.9% 2013-14 Undisclosed 1.9% 1.7% 3.6% 2.1% 1.5% 3.6% 2013-14 Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% 2013-14 Non-URM 48.3% 39.8% 88.1% 52.0% 40.6% 92.6% 2013-14 URM 5.3% 6.6% 11.9% 3.5% 3.8% 7.4% 9 - Tables

Academic Year Race/Ethnicity Male Female Total Male Female Total 2012-13 Asian American 10.7% 10.4% 21.1% 10.7% 9.0% 19.6% 2012-13 Black/African American 1.9% 3.0% 4.9% 1.1% 1.3% 2.4% 2012-13 Foreign 0.7% 0.8% 1.5% 0.6% 0.6% 1.1% 2012-13 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 2012-13 Hispanic/Latino 3.1% 3.0% 6.1% 1.9% 1.9% 3.9% 2012-13 Multiple Races 1.7% 1.6% 3.4% 1.2% 1.5% 2.8% 2012-13 Native American/Alaska Native 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 2012-13 White 33.3% 25.7% 59.1% 38.2% 28.2% 66.4% 2012-13 Undisclosed 1.9% 1.7% 3.6% 1.9% 1.7% 3.6% 2012-13 Total 53.6% 46.4% 100.0% 55.8% 44.2% 100.0% 2012-13 Non-URM 48.4% 40.2% 88.6% 52.5% 40.9% 93.4% 2012-13 URM 5.2% 6.1% 11.4% 3.2% 3.3% 6.6% 2011-12 Asian American 10.1% 10.0% 20.2% 9.8% 8.2% 18.0% 2011-12 Black/African American 2.0% 2.9% 4.9% 1.0% 1.5% 2.5% 2011-12 Foreign 0.9% 0.7% 1.6% 0.5% 0.5% 1.0% 2011-12 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 2011-12 Hispanic/Latino 2.8% 2.8% 5.7% 2.4% 1.8% 4.2% 2011-12 Multiple Races 1.7% 1.7% 3.4% 1.7% 1.4% 3.1% 2011-12 Native American/Alaska Native 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 2011-12 White 32.9% 26.2% 59.0% 38.3% 28.5% 66.8% 2011-12 Undisclosed 2.5% 2.4% 4.9% 2.1% 2.1% 4.2% 2011-12 Total 53.2% 46.8% 100.0% 55.9% 44.1% 100.0% 2011-12 Non-URM 48.1% 40.9% 89.1% 52.3% 40.7% 93.0% 2011-12 URM 5.0% 5.9% 10.9% 3.6% 3.4% 7.0% 10 - Tables

Academic Year Race/Ethnicity Male Female Total Male Female Total 2010-11 Asian American 9.7% 9.8% 19.5% 10.4% 9.7% 20.2% 2010-11 Black/African American 1.7% 3.1% 4.8% 0.7% 1.7% 2.4% 2010-11 Foreign 0.8% 0.6% 1.3% 0.4% 0.2% 0.6% 2010-11 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2010-11 Hispanic/Latino 2.8% 2.7% 5.5% 2.0% 1.9% 3.8% 2010-11 Multiple Races 1.5% 1.7% 3.2% 1.7% 1.6% 3.3% 2010-11 Native American/Alaska Native 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 2010-11 White 32.6% 27.0% 59.6% 37.8% 29.9% 67.7% 2010-11 Undisclosed 2.9% 2.8% 5.7% 0.9% 0.8% 1.7% 2010-11 Total 52.2% 47.7% 100.0% 54.0% 46.0% 100.0% 2010-11 Non-URM 47.5% 41.9% 89.4% 51.2% 42.3% 93.5% 2010-11 URM 4.8% 5.9% 10.6% 2.8% 3.7% 6.5% 2009-10 Asian American 9.4% 9.8% 19.2% 9.1% 8.2% 17.3% 2009-10 Black/African American 1.6% 3.3% 5.0% 0.8% 1.7% 2.6% 2009-10 Foreign 0.6% 0.6% 1.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.8% 2009-10 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 2009-10 Hispanic/Latino 2.6% 3.1% 5.7% 2.1% 2.0% 4.1% 2009-10 Multiple Races 1.3% 1.4% 2.7% 0.9% 1.3% 2.2% 2009-10 Native American/Alaska Native 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 2009-10 White 31.9% 26.4% 58.3% 35.4% 29.0% 64.4% 2009-10 Undisclosed 4.0% 3.5% 7.5% 4.2% 4.1% 8.3% 2009-10 Total 51.6% 48.4% 100.0% 53.2% 46.8% 100.0% 2009-10 Non-URM 47.2% 41.6% 88.9% 50.0% 43.0% 93.0% 2009-10 URM 4.4% 6.7% 11.1% 3.1% 3.8% 7.0% 11 - Tables

Figure 1: AACOMAS - Female and Underrepresented Minorities 48.4% 47.7% 46.8% 46.4% 46.4% 46.1% 46.5% 48.5% Percent Female Percent URM 11.1% 10.6% 10.9% 11.3% 11.7% 12.8% 13.6% 15.0% 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Figure 2: Percent AACOMAS - Underrepresented Minorities by Gender 6.7% 4.4% 6.6% 5.9% 5.9% 6.1% 5.0% 5.2% 5.3% 4.8% 8.7% 7.6% 6.7% 6.2% 6.1% 6.3% Percent Female URM Percent Male URM 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 12 - Figures

Figure 3: AACOMAS - Female and Underrepresented Minorities 47.0% 46.0% 44.1% 44.2% 44.4% 43.2% 44.4% 45.9% Percent Female Percent URM 7.0% 6.5% 6.9% 6.5% 7.3% 8.2% 8.9% 8.5% 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Figure 4: Percent AACOMAS - Underrepresented Minorities by Gender 4.5% 4.3% 4.7% 3.8% 3.1% 3.7% 3.6% 3.4% 3.3% 3.2% 3.8% 3.5% 4.0% 3.8% 2.8% Percent Female URM Percent Male URM 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 13 - Figures

Figure 5: Percent AACOMAS who Matriculated* - Race/Ethnicity Non-URM URM 40.2% 40.1% 39.8% 38.5% 39.2% 37.9% 34.5% 35.2% 24.0% 23.3% 24.0% 21.2% 23.1% 23.3% 21.3% 18.6% 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 *The graph displays the percentage of URM males and females along with non-urm males and females who applied through AACOMAS and matriculated to an osteopathic medical school, as opposed to those who applied but did not matriculate. Figure 6: Percent AACOMAS who Matriculated* - Gender Male Female 39.7% 39.6% 39.7% 37.5% 38.1% 38.6% 36.8% 38.0% 35.6% 34.9% 35.7% 33.8% 34.1% 34.4% 31.2% 30.9% 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 *The graph displays the percentage of URM males and females along with non-urm males and females who applied through AACOMAS and matriculated to an osteopathic medical school, as opposed to those who applied but did not matriculate. 14 - Figures

Figure 7: Percent AACOMAS who Matriculated* by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Male - Non-URM Female Non-URM Male - URM Female - URM 17.7% 19.9% 33.8% 36.4% 19.2% 23.9% 33.5% 35.4% 21.5% 25.2% 35.9% 39.7% 21.6% 24.8% 38.0% 40.1% 19.9% 22.6% 37.2% 39.7% 21.8% 26.7% 37.5% 41.0% 23.8% 22.7% 38.7% 41.3% 21.8% 27.3% 39.7% 40.7% 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 *The graph displays the percentage of URM males and females along with non-urm males and females who applied through AACOMAS and matriculated to an osteopathic medical school, as opposed to those who applied but did not matriculate. Figure 8: First Year Enrollment - Female and Underrepresented Minorities 46.8% 46.2% 44.9% 44.5% 44.2% 43.0% 44.3% 45.8% Percent Female Percent URM 6.9% 7.2% 7.3% 7.2% 8.1% 8.5% 9.0% 8.9% 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 15 - Figures

Figure 9: Total Enrollment - Female and Underrepresented Minorities 47.7% 47.2% 46.2% 45.6% 45.1% 44.4% 44.4% 44.7% Percent Female Percent URM 7.7% 7.8% 7.3% 7.2% 7.5% 7.8% 8.1% 8.5% 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 16 - Figures