Deliverable 4.4. Network Report

Similar documents
Interview on Quality Education

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Sharing Information on Progress. Steinbeis University Berlin - Institute Corporate Responsibility Management. Report no. 2

InTraServ. Dissemination Plan INFORMATION SOCIETY TECHNOLOGIES (IST) PROGRAMME. Intelligent Training Service for Management Training in SMEs

The European Higher Education Area in 2012:

SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

SME Academia cooperation in research projects in Research for the Benefit of SMEs within FP7 Capacities programme

Tailoring i EW-MFA (Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounting/Analysis) information and indicators

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

D.10.7 Dissemination Conference - Conference Minutes

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

WELCOME WEBBASED E-LEARNING FOR SME AND CRAFTSMEN OF MODERN EUROPE

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

ehealth Governance Initiative: Joint Action JA-EHGov & Thematic Network SEHGovIA DELIVERABLE Version: 2.4 Date:

The European Consensus on Development: the contribution of Development Education & Awareness Raising

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

WHAT IS AEGEE? AEGEE-EUROPE PRESENTATION EUROPEAN STUDENTS FORUM

CEN/ISSS ecat Workshop

CALL FOR PARTICIPANTS

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

WP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions in H2020

Summary and policy recommendations

National and Regional performance and accountability: State of the Nation/Region Program Costa Rica.

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY IN EUROPE II

Baku Regional Seminar in a nutshell

Coimisiún na Scrúduithe Stáit State Examinations Commission LEAVING CERTIFICATE 2008 MARKING SCHEME GEOGRAPHY HIGHER LEVEL

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

06-07 th September 2012, Constanta Romania th Sept 2012

Fostering learning mobility in Europe

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Content. 1. Technical workshop Marine Directive

Study on the implementation and development of an ECVET system for apprenticeship

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Contents. (1) Activities Units of learning outcomes and expert interviews... 2

Summary Report. ECVET Agent Exploration Study. Prepared by Meath Partnership February 2015

Accreditation in Europe. Zürcher Fachhochschule

Assessment and national report of Poland on the existing training provisions of professionals in the Healthcare Waste Management industry REPORT: III

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

ESTONIA. spotlight on VET. Education and training in figures. spotlight on VET

General report Student Participation in Higher Education Governance

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

Towards sustainability audits in Finnish schools Development of criteria for social and cultural sustainability

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING. Version: 14 November 2017

EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

EQE Candidate Support Project (CSP) Frequently Asked Questions - National Offices

GREAT Britain: Film Brief

international PROJECTS MOSCOW

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

Knowledge Sharing Workshop, Tiel The Netherlands, 20 September 2016

Alternative education: Filling the gap in emergency and post-conflict situations

EQF Pro 1 st Partner Meeting Lille, 28 March 2008, 9:30 16:30.

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

European Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research - COST - Brussels, 24 May 2013 COST 024/13

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying document to the

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

National Pre Analysis Report. Republic of MACEDONIA. Goce Delcev University Stip

Pharmaceutical Medicine as a Specialised Discipline of Medicine

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE

03/07/15. Research-based welfare education. A policy brief

Addressing TB in the Mines: A Multi- Sector Approach in Practice

SEDRIN School Education for Roma Integration LLP GR-COMENIUS-CMP

LIFELONG LEARNING PROGRAMME ERASMUS Academic Network

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

Annex 4 University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

THE WEB 2.0 AS A PLATFORM FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SKILLS, IMPROVE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND DESIGNER CAREER PROMOTION IN THE UNIVERSITY

Impact of Educational Reforms to International Cooperation CASE: Finland

No educational system is better than its teachers

Curriculum for the Academy Profession Degree Programme in Energy Technology

11:00 am Robotics and the Law: An American Perspective Prof. Ryan Calo, University of Washington School of Law

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

The development of ECVET in Europe

Irene Middle School. Pilot 1 MobilED Pilot 2

2 di 7 29/06/

ESSEC & MANNHEIM Executive MBA

Evidence into Practice: An International Perspective. CMHO Conference, Toronto, November 2008

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Summary results (year 1-3)

A comparative study on cost-sharing in higher education Using the case study approach to contribute to evidence-based policy

EUROPEAN STUDY & CAREER FAIR

IMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL?

Self-archived version. Citation:

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Meeting on the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) and Good Practices in Skills Development

This Access Agreement covers all relevant University provision delivered on-campus or in our UK partner institutions.

Transcription:

Deliverable 4.4 Network Report

AUTHOR(S) Manuela GHEOLDUS (BIO by Deloitte) Andreas Endl, Gerald Berger (Institute for Managing Sustainability, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna) Project coordination and editing provided by Institute for Managing Sustainability, Vienna University of Economics and Business. Manuscript completed in April 2015 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.cobalt-fp7.eu/ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT & DISCLAIMER The work leading to this publication has received funding from the European Union FP7 ENV.2013.6.5-2 grant agreement n 603509 Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. COBALT Network Report Page ii

COBALT Project partners Vienna University of Economics and Business, Institute for Managing Sustainability (Coordinator), Vienna, Austria Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH, Berlin, Germany BIO Intelligence Service, Paris, France Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå, Sweden TÉCNICA Y PROYECTOS SA, TYPSA Madrid, Spain National Association for Consumers' Protection and Promotion of Programs and Strategies, Bucharest, Romania Page iii COBALT Network Report

Table of Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 COBALT stakeholder database 6 2.1 Mapping the stakeholder database 6 2.1.1 Overview of COBALT stakeholders 6 2.1.2 Development of contact database 7 2.2 Stakeholder management 8 3 Stakeholder roles in sustainable raw materials management 11 3.1 EU and Regional Dialogues 11 3.2 COBALT conferences and recommendations 12 3.3 Skills shortages 13 4 EIP involvement 14 5 Conclusions 16 COBALT Network Report Page iv

1 Introduction This report explains the integrated approach to engaging stakeholders (i.e. to identifying, selecting, entering into and maintaining contact) throughout the project and, furthermore, describes the various stakeholder groups and their activities and involvement in the COBALT project. Overall, the COBALT project offered a platform for open dialogue and exchange for all concerned stakeholders to bring in their perspectives and views on challenges on the route towards a more sustainable raw materials management in Europe. Different stakeholders across the entire value chain of raw materials supply and use were identified: business and industry (e.g. industry associations and SMEs), CSOs (e.g. consumer organisations and environmental NGOs), EU and national policy makers, national geological surveys, and public and private research organisations. An overview of stakeholders and their needs is provided in Chapter 2. During the course of the project, the COBALT project team applied an integrated strategy for involving stakeholders in all of the project s Work Packages (WPs): 1) 3 EU and three Regional Dialogues were organised, allowing stakeholders to exchange on topics related to the sustainable management of raw materials along the whole value chain. The COBALT team published a series of project publications (i.e. Policy Briefs, Summaries, COBALT Dialogue event Adaptation and Synthesis Reports) on the project website (www.cobalt-fp7.eu/download), which reflect on the views and perceptions of different stakeholders.. 2) 2 conferences were organised at the beginning and end of the project, respectively, giving stakeholders the opportunity to exchange on potential solutions along the value chain from extraction to consumption and recycling at end of product life. Two reports were drafted outlining the main conclusions of the conferences. Moreover, the project team published a recommendations paper on effective stakeholder dialogue. 3) The project team tested two pilot courses targeted towards skills development on sustainable management of raw materials of students and university professionals. Chapter 3 illustrates the role of stakeholders in the different deliverables of the COBALT project mentioned above. In general, the different stakeholder groups reflected on their roles and competences during the COBALT EU and Regional Dialogues on themes such as ecodesign, urban mining, sustainable consumption and production, transparency in the supply chain etc. They also exchanged on future paths for collaboration. Moreover, academia and university professionals contributed to the development of pilot courses on sustainable management of raw materials. Finally, the COBALT project engaged with various European Innovation Partnership on Raw Materials (EIP) stakeholders in order to ensure coordination, increased EIP stakeholder outreach, and streamlining of project activities (see chapter 4). Page 5 COBALT Network Report

2 COBALT stakeholder database 2.1 Mapping the stakeholder database 2.1.1 Overview of COBALT stakeholders The COBALT project was embedded into a complex network of stakeholder relationships in the area of raw materials management in Europe. The project team identified four key stakeholder groups involved in the sustainable management of raw materials as well as their individual needs to be addressed throughout the project running time. Some of the needs identified initially by the project team are illustrated below: Stakeholder groups Type of actors Needs Civil Society Environmental and social NGOs, consumers associations, trade unions - Low awareness of product related resource impact - Low awareness of job opportunities in the sustainable management of raw materials - Need to increase awareness and capacity to engage in and support policy decision-making processes Industry SMEs, industry associations - Lacking access to best practices in eco-innovation and new business models - Need for awareness on skill shortages Policy Government ministries from different political levels (EU, national, regional, subregional), Geological surveys - Need for expertise and guidance from stakeholders on technical and process related issues in sustainable raw materials management - Data on raw materials specific issues - Need for research coordination and comanagement approaches Research University research institutes, private research organisation, think tanks, consultants - Interdisciplinary challenges in bringing together different concepts, methods, and findings from various disciplines and research projects - Interest in dissemination of research results - Need for awareness of skills shortages COBALT Network Report Page 6

2.1.2 Development of contact database The COBALT project team has built up and extended a stakeholder database during the project s whole duration. In order to target national audiences more efficiently, each COBALT project partner filled in an Excel spreadsheet with a selected number of stakeholders and multiplier networks from their own contact databases in the framework of task 4.2. The multiplier is well connected and possessed local language competencies as well as raw material experience. For example, national CSOs associations, industry federations etc. were considered network multipliers as long as they could channel information between the project team and the other stakeholders, at the EU and national level. Each project partner identified multiplier networks in the different European regions selected at the outset of the project (north, south, and east 1 ) A consolidated list of stakeholders was then complied covering all the groups identified above and representing the different European regions. The stakeholders were classified by type of actors, organisation and country. After the initial mapping of the multipliers networks, 175 stakeholders were identified by the project team covering all stakeholder groups identified above. The breakdown of the network by type of stakeholder is illustrated below: Industry Policy CSOs Academia Academia 31% Industry 28% CSOs 7% Policy 34% Figure 1: Stakeholder breakdown The multipliers network covered 23 European countries (incl. 22 EU Member States) as illustrated in the figure below. The countries which registered the highest number of identified stakeholders were Germany, France, Spain, Sweden, Romania etc. 1 North Sea: Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, The Netherlands, Sweden and the UK Iberian Peninsula: Portugal and Spain Eastern Europe: Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia Page 7 COBALT Network Report

54 31 18 16 15 14 12 9 9 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 DE BE ES UK FR SE RO AT PT FI IT NL PO BE EE HU DK SK CZ GR LV NO SL Figure 2: Countries covered by the database The multipliers network database represented by the 175 stakeholders evolved into a stakeholder contact database improved and updated throughout the project running time. At the end of the project, the stakeholder contact database counted more than 1000 stakeholders. 2.2 Stakeholder management The multipliers network database developed by the project team served as a contact stakeholder database throughout the whole project running time. The database was particularly useful for the organisation of the EU and Regional COBALT Dialogues and for the Opening and Closing conferences. Three EU Dialogues, three Regional Dialogues and two conferences (opening and closing) were organised during the project as follows: COBALT events Opening conference Topic Location Date Exploring solutions for future actions Brussels 28-29 November 2013 First EU Dialogue Ecodesign and New Business Models for a Circular Economy Brussels 27 February 2014 Second EU Dialogue First Regional Dialogue Urban Mines, Consumer Behaviour and Producer Responsibility in a Circular Economy Sustainable raw materials management and circular economy in the Iberian Peninsula: the role of industry and consumers in optimizing the raw materials value chain Brussels 6 June 2014 Madrid 12 June 2014 Second Regional Towards sustainable mineral production: the role of Copenhagen 8 October COBALT Network Report Page 8

Dialogue industry and civil society 2014 Third Regional Dialogue The role of civil society and industry in driving a sustainable production and consumption in Eastern Europe Bucharest 27 November 2014 Third EU Dialogue Raw material scarcity in Europe: stakeholder collaboration to achieve a transparent and accountable supply chain Brussels 11 February 2015 Closing Conference Sustainable raw materials management in Europe Fostering stakeholder dialogue to deliver on the future Brussels 23-24 March The extensive contact list compiled by all COBALT project partners, including stakeholders of all key types, was used a basis for targeting organisations and corresponding contacts for both, speakers and participants, during the preparatory stage of the COBALT Dialogues and Conferences. The stakeholder database covered all the topics addressed during the 8 events organised throughout the project. However, before each event, the list was extended via: A targeted internet search to identify key EU-level, national and regional stakeholders, particularly those attending or speaking at other relevant workshops and conference, and A targeted search for individuals with relevant expertise and responsibility for the respective Dialog and/or Conference in relevant organisations, civil society organisations, businesses and other relevant institutions The extended stakeholder selection depended on two factors: the theme of the different Dialogues and the type of Dialogue (European or Regional). For example, for the first two EU Dialogues and the first Regional Dialogue, stakeholders from different stages of the raw materials supply chain were selected, from eco-design to recycling and urban mines. The second Regional Dialogue brought together key regional stakeholders to exchange and debate on sustainable mineral production in the North Sea Region. The contact database was then extended for this particular region and on this specific topic. The third EU and Regional Dialogues allowed for the extension of the contact database on more integrated approaches such as sustainable consumption and production, transparency and accountability of the supply chain. With regards to the Opening and Closing conferences, the approaches were rather different considering the timing of the conferences. The approach of selecting stakeholders for the Opening conference was the following: a) identifying relevant European level business and CSO players along the value chain, i.e. Euromines for mining, IMA Europe and Eurometaux for processing, Umicore for refining and recycling, various other EU business associations (FEAD), environmental NGOs (Friends of the Earth), social justice NGOs (ANPED), EU level consumer associations BEUC and ANEC, and on the pragmatic approach of: b) Reviewing Partners existing project networks and contact lists to identify relevant additional institutions or individuals working in the institutions identified. The Closing conference did not require the same approach as in the Opening one as it built on the stakeholder database established and maintained through the entire duration of the COBALT project. The selection and identification process consisted in inviting all participants and invitees for each of the COBALT events mentioned above. Page 9 COBALT Network Report

The COBALT stakeholder database has been regularly updated and substantially extended before and after each event. The version excluded any stakeholders who had faulty email addresses. Similarly, stakeholders who participated in the events or who replied negatively to the COBALT invitations but have shown interest to participate in future events or activities were included in the contact database. COBALT Network Report Page 10

3 Stakeholder roles in sustainable raw materials management The COBALT project engaged with stakeholders during the whole project s running time through various activities. This chapter aims to illustrate the role of stakeholders in the different COBALT project activities and publications. 3.1 EU and Regional Dialogues The objectives of the EU and Regional Dialogues were to: to foster a targeted European dialogue between civil society and industry, on topics related to raw material efficiency and sustainable raw material use to facilitate exchange of ideas and solicit feedback on research needs to inform relevant EU policy and to recommend strategies for improved communication between civil society and industry All EU and Regional dialogues focused on topics of common EU and regional interest and engaged a variety of stakeholders involved in the sustainable raw materials management, as described in the previous chapter. COBALT team members strived to invite stakeholders from different sectors of the raw materials value chain, with a particular focus on industry/business and civil society stakeholders, to allow diverse positions and all stages of the value chain to be represented. The stakeholder exchange was characterised by an interactive format (i.e. small facilitated table group discussions), allowing participants to engage amongst each other via inter and intra-stakeholder dialogues. The intra-stakeholder dialogues allowed participants to interact with other participants from their own stakeholder group and to reflect more extensively on their roles and competencies in driving sustainable raw materials management. The roles of each stakeholder groups are illustrated below 2 : Stakeholder Roles Industry Improves process efficiency, ensuring provision of raw materials in a sustainable way; Develops new business models and designs of more sustainable products while guaranteeing traceability and transparency in the supply chain; Policy Steers more sustainable behaviour and develops a strong underlying policy framework; Steers dialogue between stakeholders by creating a regulatory and administrative framework for common playing-field; Research Facilitates cross-stakeholder collaboration, as trustworthy independent 2 Please see the COBALT Policy Briefs for more information and background: http://www.cobalt-fp7.eu/download Page 11 COBALT Network Report

institutions with technological competences on processes (mining, recycling, re-use, Life Cycle Analysis etc.); Innovates along the raw materials supply chain; CSOs Drive sustainable behaviour via awareness raising and boosts civilsociety engagement; 3.2 COBALT conferences and recommendations Opening conference Exploring solutions for future actions The Opening conference gave stakeholders the opportunity to exchange on potential solutions along the value chain from extraction to consumption and recycling at end of product life. The conference also identified how industry can be best supported to meet the challenge of changing global material demands in ways which also deliver on social and environmental needs in relation to raw material use. Two interactive working groups gathered stakeholder views during the opening conference. Representatives from CSO, industry, policy and research exchanged on topics such as: How to successfully implement the European Innovation Partnership on raw materials Learning from existing best practices along value-chains In the ensuing discussions, industry and CSOs have outlined key challenges in fostering sustainable raw materials management and recommended action areas. The metals industry has called for focusing on securing access to raw materials (primary and secondary), to allow for free and fair trade and foster product eco-design, which puts emphasis on durability and recyclability of products. This will require the involvement of all actors in the value chain. Civil society addressed the need to measure resource use in Europe as coherent policy strategy is missing in the EU. Measurement should be based on consumption, as it triggers raw materials extraction and production outside Europe. Stakeholders also reflected on drivers enabling successful frameworks for collaboration. According to them, fostering sustainable raw materials management should be a step-wise process that allows for different approaches and paces while working towards the same overall objective. Efforts should build on structures already in place (such as efforts towards improving recycling and substitution) and develop further via collaboration. Closing Conference Fostering stakeholder dialogue The Closing conference aimed to (1) raise awareness on the need to further improve multistakeholder dialogue, (2) identify thematic areas in need of enhancing dialogues, and (3) elaborate recommendations for how best to enhance dialogues among a multitude of actors from industry, business, civil society, geological surveys, policy making and academia. Amongst others, the conference also presented Lessons learnt and recommendations draft document based on the COBALT activities over the past 2 years as regards to relevant thematic areas that need further dialogue and collaboration between the different stakeholder groups. On the first conference day, three parallel working grous were held on the following themes: Stakeholder involvement and sustainable primary raw materials extraction Stakeholder involvement and circular economy Stakeholder involvement and product eco-desgin COBALT Network Report Page 12

The working groups had as an objective to identify key areas where fresh collaborative actions is needed in order to progress in the respective area. Stakeholders illustrated the need to better harmonize mineral policies between Member states as well as fostering mutual understanding if the technological processes, necessities and limits of extraction. With regards to stakeholder involvement in the circular economy, using incentives and economic instruments aiming to internalise external costs of products was identified as a key action area. Moreover, the implementation of EU Regulations with regards to Extended Producers Responsibility and Ecodesign shod also be a priority. Finally, stakeholders underlined that providing the skills needed of designers to meet design needs for environmentally friendly products linking different disciplines is necessary. 10 COBALT recommendations for an effective multi-stakeholder dialogue This project publication proposes recommendations on improving stakeholder collaborations via awareness, learning and dialogue and summarises the main lessons learnt during the COBALT project. The publication was drafted based on previous project input and findings from the events, and was elaborated by the project team, a working group during the closing conference and the Advisory Board. 3.3 Skills shortages Skills and knowledge issues related to raw materials have been recognised both on the European and on national levels of many EU Member states as one of the key challenges for the successful implementation of the national and EU-level raw material strategies 3. The COBALT project aimed at supporting universities, industry as well as public agencies, to tackle the problem of skills shortages related to the increasing importance of resource efficiency and sustainability issues within primary raw materials extraction and processing, but also with respect to recycling and secondary raw materials. Work package 3 of the COBALT project has been addressing skills, knowledge and competences issues related to raw materials by a tree-step approach: (i) surveying of existing educational offers and identification of skill shortages, (ii) planning of schemes for their mitigation and finally (iii) testing and evaluation. Stakeholders played an important role during the development and pilot testing of short courses, block courses and full study programmes in step two and three. Firstly, the Short course for layman persons targeted stakeholder groups with limited technological background competences, such as policy makers and civil society organisations. Secondly, the Block module extension courses for engineers with other background than mineral production, targeted either professionals already working in industry or BSc level university students. Finally, the Full study programme for specialisation on master level, was addressed to the local population of Greenland 4 and to students outside the region. 3 COBALT report on Available study programmes and existing skills shortages, March 2014 4 Greenland was identified by the COBALT project team as a country with trong geological potential that is expected to emerge as an important future mining region. Page 13 COBALT Network Report

4 EIP involvement COBALT is designed inter alia to support the objectives and activities of the European Innovation Partnership on Raw Materials (EIP) by exchange of knowledge and promoting the perspectives of SMEs and civil society in particular in relation to forming new partnerships. In order to strengthen the link between COBALT and the EIP, and to enable tailoring of COBALT s activities and topics to EIP s targets, multiple lines of communication and coordination were part of task 5.3. The major liaising and coordination instruments with different EIP bodies and stakeholders (see further below 5 ) were COBALT events (i.e. COBALT conferences and workshops) COBALT Advisory Board and EIP meetings Ad-hoc Communication via email and telephone COBALT participation at two EIP Annual Conferences (2014 and 2015) Essentially, all COBALT stakeholder exchange activities (i.e. conferences and workshops) guaranteed an extended outreach to non-eip stakeholders, who nonetheless play a crucial and supportive role for sustainable raw materials management along the whole supply chain. Moreover, non-eip stakeholders got the importunity to bring in their perspectives and expertise to EIP tailored activities and content headlines which have been elaborated during the COBALT project. In that sense, COBALT enabled EIP stakeholders to draw from the experience and knowledge from a wider community of stakeholders, in particular, civil society and industry. The purpose and benefits of interaction during the projects running time varied between the different EIP stakeholder groups (EIP DG GROW governance body, EIP High Level Steering Group, EIP Operational Group experts) and are shortly outlined below: EIP DG GROW governance body: The COBALT project made sure that most of its activities were aligned towards the major EIP content headlines by exchanging with representatives of DG GROW (i.e. Mr Mattia Pellegrini, Mr Milan Grohol, Ms Anne Auffret) during project events and internal meetings. Consequently, COBALT made sure that EIP objectives were supported through a wider stakeholder outreach and involvement in content-related areas of the EIP Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP). Vice versa, EIP DG GROW representatives have been given a platform to promote and collect major input for EIP activities at the two major COBALT events (e.g. COBALT Opening Conference: working group on fine-tuning of SIP action areas). EIP High Level Steering Group (HLSG) and SHERPA Group: COBALT involved several HLSG members or their SHERPA representatives in the COBALT events and AB/EIP meetings in order to 1) provide guidance of major topics of interest for COBALT events, 2) contribute to the development of recommendations for effective stakeholder dialogue, 3) support the project in identification of opinion leaders and keynote speakers and in better assessing the relevance of the importance of individual stakeholders 4) as well as attracting the right participants to the dialogues. The following organisations and affiliated representatives have been strongly involved in the project Advisory Board 5 For a more detailed overview on the EIP Raw Materials governance structure please see: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/raw-materials/en/content/eip-governance COBALT Network Report Page 14

(UMICORE, Eurogeosurveys, Corina Hebestreit/EUROMINES), and made a significant contribution to other major COBALT workshops and conferences (WEEE Forum, ERAMET, European Partners for the Environment, Polish Deputy-Prime Minister and Minister of Economy, Spanish Secretary of State for Science, Technology and Innovation, ETP-SMR, European Technology Platform on Sustainable mineral Resources etc.) EIP operational groups: EIP operational group representatives (i.e. provide expert advice to the Sherpa Group and HLSG) have brought in their expertise and knowledge throughout all COBALT events and activities. The have been involved through, for example, key-note and case study presenters as well as key discussants and panellists at both COBALT conferences and workshops. EIP Raw Material Commitments and affiliated organisations: Several EIP Raw Material Commitments have been provided the opportunity to present their activities at COBALT events and, consequently, acquire important feedback for future developments and networking possibilities from a wider stakeholder community. Page 15 COBALT Network Report

5 Conclusions The COBALT project established and implemented a successful integrated approach to involve stakeholders throughout its running time. After having identified key stakeholder groups across the raw materials value chain, the Project team created a multipliers network database which served as basis for targeting organisations and corresponding contacts for both speakers and participants during the preparatory stage of the Cobalt Dialogues and Conferences. The multipliers network database served was at the origins of the contact stakeholder database which was updated before each event via targeted internet search deepening on the topic discussed. Throughout the COBALT project, the project team involved stakeholders by means of three main approaches. Firstly, stakeholders were involved in an informative manner via awareness raising and capacity to build activities. Dissemination tools such as the COBALT website and social media (Twitter, LinkedIn) played an important role in communicating with stakeholders on progress, future events and deliverables developed by the project team. Secondly, stakeholders played a consultative role, especially the EIP stakeholder groups (EIP DG GROW governance body, EIP High Level Steering Group, EIP Operational Group experts) who contributed to the project in various ways throughout its running time. If the EIP DG GROW played a more important role in ensuring that that all activities were aligned towards the major EIP content headlines, the EIP High Level Steering Group contributed to the development of recommendations for effective stakeholder dialogue and the EIP Operational Group experts have brought in their expertise and knowledge throughout all COBALT events and activities. The COBALT Consortium composition has also played a key role in the stakeholder engagement. Composed of two universities, two private research companies, one private company, and one national consumer association, the consortium brought focused and complementary expertise across the following areas: raw material efficiency, replacement and substitution, raw materials exploration, mining and processing, recycling and waste management, consumer awareness issues etc. Project partners provided both the necessary content expertise as well as stakeholder contacts for 1) extending the stakeholder community on sustainable raw materials management and 2) providing a more holistic approach to the EIP. Last but not least, stakeholders were involved in a functional manner during the COBALT Dialogues and Conferences. Stakeholders had the opportunity to identify their own competences and roles, frame their own stakeholder groups understanding and find interfaces for collaboration. The COBALT project team played three key roles during the Dialogues and Conferences: 1) act as a neutral facilitator for fostering collaboration as well as mutual understanding in more contentious areas, 2) provide Dialogue formats enabling different stakeholder perspectives, 3) facilitate and moderate discussions. COBALT Network Report Page 16

The COBALT stakeholder exchange activities guaranteed an extended outreach to non-eip stakeholders, who nonetheless play a crucial and supportive role for sustainable raw materials management along the whole supply chain. Page 17 COBALT Network Report