LESSONS LEARNED FORM

Similar documents
Prince2 Foundation and Practitioner Training Exam Preparation

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

Software Development Plan

Guidelines for Incorporating Publication into a Thesis. September, 2015

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

Introduction to CRC Cards

University of Toronto

M55205-Mastering Microsoft Project 2016

FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Task Types. Duration, Work and Units Prepared by

City of Roseville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Scope of Services

State Parental Involvement Plan

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

Leader s Guide: Dream Big and Plan for Success

FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Introduction to Information System

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Learning Lesson Study Course

Value Creation Through! Integration Workshop! Value Stream Analysis and Mapping for PD! January 31, 2002!

Contents. (1) Activities Units of learning outcomes and expert interviews... 2

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Exercise Format Benefits Drawbacks Desk check, audit or update

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Prepared by: Tim Boileau

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) ON THE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMME

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Program Change Proposal:

SAMPLE AFFILIATION AGREEMENT

OilSim. Talent Management and Retention in the Oil and Gas Industry. Global network of training centers and technical facilities

IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

CHARTER SCHOOL APPLICATION TIMELINE

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Secondary English-Language Arts

Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Some Basic Active Learning Strategies

Student Experience Strategy

Utilizing Soft System Methodology to Increase Productivity of Shell Fabrication Sushant Sudheer Takekar 1 Dr. D.N. Raut 2

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Appendix IX. Resume of Financial Aid Director. Professional Development Training

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

CERTIFIED PROJECT MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (CPMS) STUDY GUIDE

Operational Knowledge Management: a way to manage competence

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

UTILITY POLE ATTACHMENTS Understanding New FCC Regulations and Industry Trends

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Chamilo 2.0: A Second Generation Open Source E-learning and Collaboration Platform

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

The Site Visit: How to Prepare for It & What to Expect. STARTALK Conference Atlanta, GA May 3, 2012

ADAPTIVE PLANNING. 1 Powered by POeT Solvers Limited

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Training Pack. Kaizen Focused Improvement Teams (F.I.T.)

Nichole Davis Mentoring Program Administrator Risk Management Counsel South Carolina Bar

Expert Reference Series of White Papers. Mastering Problem Management

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

TRAINING MANUAL FOR FACILITATORS OF RADIO LISTENING GROUPS

Triple P Ontario Network Peaks and Valleys of Implementation HFCC Feb. 4, 2016

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM and the INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM

School Leadership Rubrics

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

Architecting Interaction Styles

Idsall External Examinations Policy

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Clinical Quality in EMS. Noah J. Reiter, MPA, EMT-P EMS Director Lenox Hill Hospital (Rice University 00)

Running Head: Implementing Articulate Storyline using the ADDIE Model 1. Implementing Articulate Storyline using the ADDIE Model.

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

COURSE WEBSITE:

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) FOR THE COAST GUARD'S TRAINING SYSTEM. Volume 7. Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL)

BUSINESS OPERATIONS RESEARCH EVENTS

Recognition of Prior Learning

How to Take Accurate Meeting Minutes

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

Transcription:

1.0 SCOPE This Quality Work Instruction (QWI) defines the Enterprise Project Management Office (EPMO) process to effectively collect, analyze, manage and record Lessons Learned data. Lessons Learned shall be completed throughout the project life-cycle per 0300-0300-005-B PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESS and at a minimum during Project Closeout per 0300-0350-005-C PROJECT CLOSEOUT. 2.0 OWNER 2.1 The Enterprise Project Management Office (EPMO) Manager owns this QWI. No changes, additions or alterations may be made without the owner s written approval. 3.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION EPMO RECORDS per CHAPTER 121 & 132 PMBOK 0100-0800-010-B 0300-0300-005-B 0600-0600-005-B 0700-0700-005-B 0300-0350-005-C DOCUMENT PROGRAM RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSTION SCHEDULE A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE - 5TH ED FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCESS PREVENTIVE ACTION PROCESS PROJECT CLOSEOUT 4.0 ASSOCIATED FORMS FORMS IDENTIFICATION 0300-0390-005-D 5.0 DEFINITIONS FORM FORM TEAM LEAD: Link to Glossary of Definitions and Terms CONTENT MODERATOR: Link to Glossary of Definitions and Terms 6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 The Project Manager (PM) shall determine when Lessons Learned reviews are required. The PM shall identify a Lessons Learned Team Lead for the project and encourage the capture and review of Lessons Learned throughout the project life-cycle. At a minimum, Lessons Learned shall be completed during Project Closeout per 0300-0350-005-C PROJECT CLOSEOUT. (Note: A best practice Lessons Learned Methodology is available in Appendix A.) Lessons Learned Page 1 of 7 State of North Carolina

6.2 The Lessons Learned Team Lead is typically a person with knowledge of the project but not directly involved. This encourages process objectivity and development of insightful findings. 6.3 The Lessons Learned Team Lead collaborates with the PM and Business Owner to publish an agenda and determine participants. (Note: A Sample Agenda is available in Appendix B.) 6.4 The 0300-0390-005-D FORM shall be used by the Lessons Learned Team Lead to document the Lessons Learned. Agencies may add organizationally unique information as required. 6.5 Complete the Project Information. (Section 1.0) 6.6 Enter the Lessons Learned Data for the Lessons Learned. (Section 2.0) 6.7 Submit the completed Lessons Learned Form to the Content Moderator for review and validation. (Section 3.0) Other Agency reviews may be added as necessary. 6.8 Lessons Learned Repository The EPMO shall provide an Enterprise repository to facilitate the collection, retention and query of Lessons Learned data. Agency Project Management Offices (Agency PMO s), Agency PM s, EPMO Project Management Advisors (PMA s) and other personnel will place the validated 0300-0390-005-D FORM into the EPMO Lessons Learned Repository. The repository will support flexible searches, such as: Unstructured Searches: Support natural questions: What are the issues the State faces with a mobile interface project? Structured Searches: Search by PMBOK Knowledge Area. (I.e. Scope Management) (EPMO Quality Assurance will categorize Lessons Learned based on the PMBOK Knowledge Areas listed at right.) Search by Agency name. Search by Project name. Search by Project phase. (I.e. Initiation; Planning & Design; Execution & Build; Implementation; Closeout.) Search by keyword(s). Reference: PMBOK Knowledge Areas Communication Management Cost Management HR Management Integration Management Procurement Management Quality Management Risk Management Scope Management Time Management Stakeholder Management Lessons Learned Page 2 of 7 State of North Carolina

6.9 Lessons Learned may indicate a need for Corrective Action or Preventive Action. In such cases, personnel will employ the 0600-0600-005-B CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCESS or 0700-0700-005-B PREVENTIVE ACTION PROCESS as warranted. 7.0 RECORDS 7.1 Unless otherwise specified in this Procedure/QWI, Records shall be maintained in accordance with 0100-0800-010-B FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL procedure. 8.0 REASON FOR CHANGE 8.1 Initial issue. Lessons Learned Page 3 of 7 State of North Carolina

APPENDIX A: Lessons Learned Methodology Solutions Lessons Learned Actions The format below is a best practice summarized in. This document provides guidance on how to capture Lessons Learned in a participatory manner, solicit team solutions and document action plans. Lessons Learned should be explored in an open, participatory environment where ground rules and team norms have been established by team members. Each team member s thoughts should be written on flip charts, preferably in non-edited format. Consider breaking team up into different groups as this will generate more ideas and encourage participation. Facilitator should determine grouping team. 1.0 Identify What went right? Each breakout group will have a flip chart for the questions: What went right? What went wrong? What could be improved? Take 15-30 minutes to document what worked well within the project. (Figure 1: Sample What Went Right? ) 2.0 Identify What went wrong? Great team meetings - each week - at the table built relationship Precise focus defined tasks Stayed on track - fairly concise focus Good team work - mutual respect Good and various skill sets represented from business to technology Figure 1: Sample "What Went Right?" Take 15-30 minutes to document what did not go as planned. (Figure 2: Sample What Went Wrong? ) Blame game Depend too much on luck Initial milestone dates too tight Lack of documentation Ports not open as needed and security blocks Figure 2: Sample "What Went Wrong?" Lessons Learned Page 4 of 7 State of North Carolina

3.0 Identify What could have been improved? Take 15-30 minutes to document what could have been improved (areas for improvement). (Figure 3: Sample What Could be Improved? ) Original focus may have been too big Business buy-in during the front-end Timelines, anticipation and accommodation of risks and unknowns Application issues - no one on board Streamline training process Improve product testing 4.0 Identify Top 3 Priorities to Work on for Future Projects Figure 3: Sample What Could be Improved? Some common themes will most likely emerge from what went right, wrong and could have been improved. Each team can determine Top 3 priorities; each team to present Top 3 from their team. Project Team to come to consensus on final Top 3 ideas to improve. Sample Top 3 Priorities 1. Acceptance criteria 2. Current skill set 3. Resource management 5.0 Generate Solutions and Ideas for Improvement The goal is to generate solutions on how to improve the Top 3 priorities. Simply identifying the Lessons Learned does not completely harness intellectual capital; probing for and capturing potential solutions provides greater value. Create an Improvement Idea flip chart for each of the Top 3 priorities, title the chart. Spread the sheets on paper around the room with several markers at each charts. Request everyone walk around to each flip chart and note an Improvement Idea in their own words. Sample Solutions for Top 3 Priorities Acceptance criteria: 1. Test plan that includes provisions for exceptions. 2. Identify measurable criteria based on requirements. 3. Document criteria and method to confirm criteria is met. Current skill set: 1. Prepare service support team via training. 2. Ensure appropriate level of documentation is available. 3. Identify resource support team roles. Resource management: 1. Defined roles and responsibilities across the whole team. 2. Maintain personal calendar and make available to team. 3. Define resource allocations and priorities; communicate in writing when interruptions or change to availability occur - and assess impact to assigned deliverables. 4. Ensure activity list/schedule is updated based on changes to resource availability. Lessons Learned Page 5 of 7 State of North Carolina

6.0 Generate and Map Top 3 Improvements on Impact Quadrant Itemize the solution ideas in a T-chart for each of the Top 3 Improvement Idea flip charts under the appropriate section. For ideas which are a Major Improvement and Difficult to do Create a plan. For ideas which are a Major or Minor Improvement and Easy to do Just do it. For ideas which are a Minor Improvement and Difficult to do Defer or Ignore. Map each Improvement Idea on quadrant chart similar to the chart below. Difficult to do Easy to do Major Improvement (Plan) (Just do it) Minor Improvement (Defer) (Just do it) 7.0 Corrective or Preventive Action Items Document corrective or preventive actions taken in response to the Lessons Learned. The template below is suggested to assign responsibility, the EPMO Lessons Learned template only requests the names of the actions items. Action Item(s) Primary Responsible Support Responsible Due Date Priority Lessons Learned Page 6 of 7 State of North Carolina

APPENDIX B: Sample Agenda Lessons Learned: <<Insert Project Name>> Date: <<Insert Date>> Time: <<Insert Time>> Location: <<Insert Location>> Please bring: Ideas, Lessons Learned Recorder: <<Insert Name of Recorder>> Memory Joggers: Project Management Technology Communication Business Process Resources Vendor Relationship Requirements Design and Build Implementation Testing Training PROJECT GOAL: <<Insert Project Goal>> Attendees <<Name of Facilitator>> Role / Responsibilities Facilitator Neutral; foster participation from all members. Project Team Contributors to Lessons Learned Set team norms, provide ideas, participate in discussions and help drive effective analysis & solutions. May serve as team scribe for flip chart discussions. MEETING GOAL: To make contributions to our organizational assets by discussing Lessons Learned in a productive, collaborative, open and participatory manner. Start - End Description Minutes <<Insert Start/End Time>> Introduction Team / Purpose <<Insert Duration>> Creation of Session Norms Discuss Rules of Engagement Team Contribution of Lessons Learned What did we do right? What went wrong? What could have been improved? Visioning - Identify 3 Priority Lessons Learned Generate and Map Solutions on Impact Quadrant Generate Corrective or Preventive Action Items Lessons Learned Page 7 of 7 State of North Carolina